New Study Says Global Warming is Good for Polar Bears


Polar Bears are the only known creatures who can actually make it on the streets of Detroit

The easiest way to take in this study is to take every one of those global warming propaganda posters of sad polar bears and draw a smile on that bear.

A new study indicates that global warming may actually benefit Arctic animals and ecosystem, by expanding their ranges and increasing biodiversity in the area as warmer-climate species move north.

They found that warming will actually bring in more species from further south, increasing biodiversity in the region. And, even in their worst-case scenario, they expect at most one species to go extinct: the Arctic fox. But, they suspect that this worst-case scenario is just that, a nightmare scenario unlikely to unfold.

The researchers, from Umea University in Sweden, note that these cold-weather loving species that live in the Arctic are used to having to cope with a wide range of climactic conditions — they are relatively hearty creatures.

The amusing thing about this is that, like most global warming research, the new political orthodoxy is necessary to explain the thriving polar bear population.

Global Warming is the First Cause of the cult of the Flying Al Gore Monster and all things are explained in terms of the existence of it. Thus no matter what happens, it’s proof that Global Warming lets no sparrow or polar bear fall.

If polar bears are thriving… that is proof that Global Warming causes polar bears to thrive.

  • Thomas Wells

    The loony lefties are becoming unbearable.

  • Mary Sue

    I wonder what would happen if they transplanted a few polar bears to Antarctica.

  • Monoxide

    Maybe the polar bears can bring some Rock n Rye back to their family from Detroit.

    Maybe can can call them Solar bears now..

  • JacksonPearson

    The Ten Best Things about Global Warming

    1. Why pay for tattoos when melanoma's free;

    2. No more pesky weeds. In fact, no more pesky plants;

    3. Nile Encephalitis: not just for Egyptians any morel.

    4. Furnaces convert easily into tornado shelters;

    5. Helsinki: the new Riviera;

    6. Middle East oil producers feel right at home— everywhere;

    7. Golfers only need a putter and a sand wedge;

    8. For those who can't get enough of global warming. One word: Venus;

    9. Steaks, medium rare, on the hoof;

    10. Three thongs and you're dressed!

  • FPF

    Since they also believe in evolution, why not let polar bear evolve into a new species because of "global warming"? Isn't it animal cruelty not letting them evolve?

    • figment newton

      those purporting to believe in evolution, never actually WANT a species to evolve or go extinct – survival of the fittest. they can't waste buckets of money on bureacracy and air lifting sea turtles if they actually let nature play out .. well . naturally. interference is a must. Human activitiy is blamed on all extinctions, even if the species died out long before the industrial revolution.

  • PAthena

    Those touting "global warming" as a catastrophe are scientific ignoramuses. Check out how much the self-designated "environmentalists" actually know about science. The climate of the earth is continually changing, as it always has done. 10, 000 years ago was an Ice Age, and from around 1400 to the mid-19th century was another mini-Ice Age – thank goodness the climate has warmed up!

  • Jason Webber

    I guess nobody bothered to look at the paper. First, it is about “subarctic” European species – there no polar bears on the European mainland. Second, the paper is about “non-specialist mammals” and polar bears are as specialized as mammals get. Silly article that apparently fails the most basic sniff test.

  • Treedweller

    Not to mention polar bears are threatened by shrinking polar ice because they have to swim farther and often drown. http://www.nwf.org/Wildlife/Threats-to-Wildlife/G

  • Panipak

    If you can number the years of polar bears in the Arctic and number the summers when the ice has gone for the season. That is how many times the polar bear has survived no ice season. If you look at the scientist and researchers, they are talking indirectly to the source of global warming. Trying to get them to quit what they are doing by making them guilty enought to stop using fossil fuel. That includes us who use the source of energy to have a comfortable life. Scientist and the researchers also can not go without these commodities either.

  • BeenThereDoneThat

    How off can one be Mr. Daniel Greenfield? – That’s like saying that if Radical Islam is thriving, then America causes Global Radicalism to thrive – Same smart logic, same smart conclusion… ;)

  • dresslerus

    To Been there done that, the left wackos do say that America causes Global Radical Islam to thrive. Good article Mr. Greenfield it is right on.