<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Romney Winning Latinos in Florida 46-44</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/romney-winning-latinos-in-florida-46-44/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/romney-winning-latinos-in-florida-46-44/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=romney-winning-latinos-in-florida-46-44</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 19:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Questions</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/romney-winning-latinos-in-florida-46-44/comment-page-1/#comment-3673821</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Questions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=148012#comment-3673821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Florida &quot;Latino&quot; vote, more accurately, is the Cuban vote.  Its slight Republican leanings are entirely the product of strong (and obviously justifiable) anti-Castro sentiment.  But the notion that Hispanics as a whole are &quot;natural conservatives,&quot; and that Republican candidates should court them while avoiding &quot;harsh rhetoric&quot; on immigration, is a delusion.  Every poll of Hispanics, especially Mexicans, reveals the same thing:  They are overwhelmingly Democratic on every issue.  And they drive the welfare state.   
 
Perhaps Mitt Romney can focus his energies on courting the nation&#039;s largest bloc:  whites.  Why not?  We&#039;re natural Republicans.  And we vote.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Florida &quot;Latino&quot; vote, more accurately, is the Cuban vote.  Its slight Republican leanings are entirely the product of strong (and obviously justifiable) anti-Castro sentiment.  But the notion that Hispanics as a whole are &quot;natural conservatives,&quot; and that Republican candidates should court them while avoiding &quot;harsh rhetoric&quot; on immigration, is a delusion.  Every poll of Hispanics, especially Mexicans, reveals the same thing:  They are overwhelmingly Democratic on every issue.  And they drive the welfare state.   </p>
<p>Perhaps Mitt Romney can focus his energies on courting the nation&#039;s largest bloc:  whites.  Why not?  We&#039;re natural Republicans.  And we vote.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toddcourt1</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/romney-winning-latinos-in-florida-46-44/comment-page-1/#comment-3671420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[toddcourt1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 01:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=148012#comment-3671420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I used to be a Democratic Senatorial District Delegate and this trickle up poverty isn&#039;t what I signed on for. Hillary would have done a much better job getting the US back on it&#039;s feet and back to work. Obama is no Clinton. What Bill Clinton had Barack Obama couldn&#039;t even borrow to get. Clinton had true bi-partisanship, Obama couldn&#039;t bribe a vote from legislators, even in the Democratic Senate! We don&#039;t need another 4 years of this BS. We don&#039;t need a do-over president, we need a do-er. Obama couldn&#039;t make a profit in a lemonade stand, he&#039;d give away all the product and earnings and have too much overhead. I want a real businessman to turn our suffering economy into a surplus economy. I want someone who has proven success, and can demonstrate it in his own life. I want the same opportunities for my kids that my folks had for me, I want my kid to be able to find work when he graduates in four years. That&#039;s not going to happen under Obama. Anyone who says it will is full of it, just look at his record. Are college graduates able to find work? Hell no. Obama&#039;s gotta go. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to be a Democratic Senatorial District Delegate and this trickle up poverty isn&#039;t what I signed on for. Hillary would have done a much better job getting the US back on it&#039;s feet and back to work. Obama is no Clinton. What Bill Clinton had Barack Obama couldn&#039;t even borrow to get. Clinton had true bi-partisanship, Obama couldn&#039;t bribe a vote from legislators, even in the Democratic Senate! We don&#039;t need another 4 years of this BS. We don&#039;t need a do-over president, we need a do-er. Obama couldn&#039;t make a profit in a lemonade stand, he&#039;d give away all the product and earnings and have too much overhead. I want a real businessman to turn our suffering economy into a surplus economy. I want someone who has proven success, and can demonstrate it in his own life. I want the same opportunities for my kids that my folks had for me, I want my kid to be able to find work when he graduates in four years. That&#039;s not going to happen under Obama. Anyone who says it will is full of it, just look at his record. Are college graduates able to find work? Hell no. Obama&#039;s gotta go. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 327/335 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 14:39:06 by W3 Total Cache -->