<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Anti-Democratic Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-anti-democratic-party-2</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 03:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3971694</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 01:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3971694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I come to express my views, and do it with respect and less certainty that those who differ are delusional.&quot; 
 
 
That&#039;s the problem with liberals. You think you can have your own views even when the facts aren&#039;t on your side. That&#039;s precisely why I replied to you, whether or not I like to argue, I hate lies. 
 
You&#039;re less certain because you have no practice in searching for objective facts and reason. Thank you for completing my case for me. 
 
Please don&#039;t take it personally, it&#039;s not. You seem nice enough. Your ideas however, are deadly. It leads to the circumstances we have today, and I&#039;m not talking about the state of medical research, I&#039;m talking about the state of politics in medicine as just one example. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;I come to express my views, and do it with respect and less certainty that those who differ are delusional.&quot; </p>
<p>That&#039;s the problem with liberals. You think you can have your own views even when the facts aren&#039;t on your side. That&#039;s precisely why I replied to you, whether or not I like to argue, I hate lies. </p>
<p>You&#039;re less certain because you have no practice in searching for objective facts and reason. Thank you for completing my case for me. </p>
<p>Please don&#039;t take it personally, it&#039;s not. You seem nice enough. Your ideas however, are deadly. It leads to the circumstances we have today, and I&#039;m not talking about the state of medical research, I&#039;m talking about the state of politics in medicine as just one example. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldschooltwentysix</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3970567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[oldschooltwentysix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3970567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not required to make a case, particularly in the face of your insults, to support my view. You may come here looking for an argument, but I come to express my views, and do it with respect and less certainty that those who differ are delusional.    ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not required to make a case, particularly in the face of your insults, to support my view. You may come here looking for an argument, but I come to express my views, and do it with respect and less certainty that those who differ are delusional.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3969054</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3969054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;anyway with all Rep&#039;s gaffes and faults they are Americans who are for Funding Fathers America incomparably with Dem&#039;s who are socialists who thristy for Power for ever and don&#039;t care about our country at all. We cannot equat them.&quot; 
 
The mainstream media got you to buy in to the supposed moral equivalence of the two parties. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;anyway with all Rep&#039;s gaffes and faults they are Americans who are for Funding Fathers America incomparably with Dem&#039;s who are socialists who thristy for Power for ever and don&#039;t care about our country at all. We cannot equat them.&quot; </p>
<p>The mainstream media got you to buy in to the supposed moral equivalence of the two parties. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3969048</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3969048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EXACTLY, even the worst ones! That is my point. Not just this, having higher expectations from them means we get more effective leaders on a more frequent basis. The Democratic Party is anti-American and must be destroyed and replaced with a true opposition party that respects rule of law, the constitution, things like that. Is that too much to ask? 
 
Is it?! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EXACTLY, even the worst ones! That is my point. Not just this, having higher expectations from them means we get more effective leaders on a more frequent basis. The Democratic Party is anti-American and must be destroyed and replaced with a true opposition party that respects rule of law, the constitution, things like that. Is that too much to ask? </p>
<p>Is it?! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3969037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3969037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right, I am arguing with myself because you never presented a case in the first place. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#039;re right, I am arguing with myself because you never presented a case in the first place. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldschooltwentysix</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3968819</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[oldschooltwentysix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 09:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3968819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the insults fly, that is when I get off. Have a good time arguing with yourself. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the insults fly, that is when I get off. Have a good time arguing with yourself. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3968469</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 07:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3968469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;That is your view. I said nothing about ideas, but since you mention it, I think they are both unrealistic and unhelpful to the nation&quot; 
 
 
I know you do. It was implied. 
 
 &quot;I am particularly wary when someone claims others are delusional.&quot; 
 
Should anyone care when you&#039;re the one who&#039;s delusional? 
 
To continue with my case, let&#039;s look at Obama&#039;s execution of his policies. He wants to encourage  fossil fuel independence, and he has some other ideas that are fine as visions, but his execution is not just flawed, but corrupt. Any Republican who did this would be jailed if he wasn&#039;t lynched before trial. I just can&#039;t imagine any Republican getting away with such a thing. Why? Because everyone knows that it&#039;s corrupt, except for liberals, who are so delusional that we can only expect their grand visions to work out through intense sincerity. Incompetence is never held against them. Even other liberals don&#039;t expect liberal politicians to have any business savvy so when Al Gore accidentally becomes rich from his advocacy, who will see that as corrupt? But George Bush has friendly relations with the Saudis and a family history in the oil business. This is seen as far more controversial than anything Gore ever did, and we know how much Gore made directly from his explicit political positions. Not only this, but Obama was part of ensuring he made truckloads of cash. Corruption? Of course not. What do you think, these are Republicans? No, they&#039;re just Democrats trying to help the world and things fell their way. Whatever. 
 
That&#039;s just ranting off the top of my head. Get a grip. Refusing to see important real facts is one definition of delusion. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;That is your view. I said nothing about ideas, but since you mention it, I think they are both unrealistic and unhelpful to the nation&quot; </p>
<p>I know you do. It was implied. </p>
<p> &quot;I am particularly wary when someone claims others are delusional.&quot; </p>
<p>Should anyone care when you&#039;re the one who&#039;s delusional? </p>
<p>To continue with my case, let&#039;s look at Obama&#039;s execution of his policies. He wants to encourage  fossil fuel independence, and he has some other ideas that are fine as visions, but his execution is not just flawed, but corrupt. Any Republican who did this would be jailed if he wasn&#039;t lynched before trial. I just can&#039;t imagine any Republican getting away with such a thing. Why? Because everyone knows that it&#039;s corrupt, except for liberals, who are so delusional that we can only expect their grand visions to work out through intense sincerity. Incompetence is never held against them. Even other liberals don&#039;t expect liberal politicians to have any business savvy so when Al Gore accidentally becomes rich from his advocacy, who will see that as corrupt? But George Bush has friendly relations with the Saudis and a family history in the oil business. This is seen as far more controversial than anything Gore ever did, and we know how much Gore made directly from his explicit political positions. Not only this, but Obama was part of ensuring he made truckloads of cash. Corruption? Of course not. What do you think, these are Republicans? No, they&#039;re just Democrats trying to help the world and things fell their way. Whatever. </p>
<p>That&#039;s just ranting off the top of my head. Get a grip. Refusing to see important real facts is one definition of delusion. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldschooltwentysix</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3967993</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[oldschooltwentysix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3967993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That is your view. I said nothing about ideas, but since you mention it, I think they are both unrealistic and unhelpful to the nation. Neither has a monopoly on values either, in theory or practice. I am particularly wary when someone claims others are delusional. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is your view. I said nothing about ideas, but since you mention it, I think they are both unrealistic and unhelpful to the nation. Neither has a monopoly on values either, in theory or practice. I am particularly wary when someone claims others are delusional. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3967970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3967970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Usually these days, they say, &quot;&#039;The man&#039; is stopping &#039;the one&#039; because he&#039;s black.&quot; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually these days, they say, &quot;&#039;The man&#039; is stopping &#039;the one&#039; because he&#039;s black.&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3967966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3967966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;and add that Republicans share in these problems we face and have their own capacity to be no less incompetent or malicious when it comes to running the country and ingratiating their constituencies.&quot; 
 
Wrong. As people, Republicans are just as flawed, but their ideas are usually closer to realistic and helpful to the nation and it&#039;s values. That makes all of the difference in the world. Obama is the epitome of the delusional idiot who&#039;s breaking things whether intentionally or not. Comparing him to Bush for example as though there are relevant parallels is just stupid and simple-minded, but you hear this all the time. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;and add that Republicans share in these problems we face and have their own capacity to be no less incompetent or malicious when it comes to running the country and ingratiating their constituencies.&quot; </p>
<p>Wrong. As people, Republicans are just as flawed, but their ideas are usually closer to realistic and helpful to the nation and it&#039;s values. That makes all of the difference in the world. Obama is the epitome of the delusional idiot who&#039;s breaking things whether intentionally or not. Comparing him to Bush for example as though there are relevant parallels is just stupid and simple-minded, but you hear this all the time. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3963937</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 03:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3963937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Let&#039;s see if I understand. The Democratic party is anti-democratic and anti-majority rule because it was voted into power by the majority of the voters which is actually just a coalition of minorities that slyly pose as a majority by being greater in numbers than the real majority.&quot; 
 
You&#039;re missing the fact that bribery, fraud and deception was used. That is what falsifies it as a true democracy in the Western sense. There are definitely facts not stated explicitly in order to come to this conclusion. That&#039;s why I offered to help. 
 
&quot;Not only that but the representatives of this bogus majority that&#039;s really a minority want to work within the system so they can later blow it up&quot; 
 
Correct. 
 
&quot;and then collect a pension from the system they just blew up.&quot; 
 
No. They expect to collect as part of the process of destroying it, and furthermore they are deluded in thinking that economics and energy theory are the parallel. They believe that wealth exists the way that energy exists. It can&#039;t be created or destroyed, but it can be managed. They&#039;ll collect more from the &quot;replacement&quot; of capitalism. 
 
Where have you been? 
 
&quot;OK, I get it now. Just had to rearrange the furniture upstairs.&quot; 
 
Well, OK. Don&#039;t forget the biggest fallacy that is applied to this criticism is thinking it is invalid because the theories are bad. We know the theories are bad, that is a major reason for the criticism. It won&#039;t work, but they believe they will come out meeting their objectives. If they added it all up logically before trying to sell it, we wouldn&#039;t have any problems with these radicals. If it did have any chance to work, we wouldn&#039;t be so upset. 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Let&#039;s see if I understand. The Democratic party is anti-democratic and anti-majority rule because it was voted into power by the majority of the voters which is actually just a coalition of minorities that slyly pose as a majority by being greater in numbers than the real majority.&quot; </p>
<p>You&#039;re missing the fact that bribery, fraud and deception was used. That is what falsifies it as a true democracy in the Western sense. There are definitely facts not stated explicitly in order to come to this conclusion. That&#039;s why I offered to help. </p>
<p>&quot;Not only that but the representatives of this bogus majority that&#039;s really a minority want to work within the system so they can later blow it up&quot; </p>
<p>Correct. </p>
<p>&quot;and then collect a pension from the system they just blew up.&quot; </p>
<p>No. They expect to collect as part of the process of destroying it, and furthermore they are deluded in thinking that economics and energy theory are the parallel. They believe that wealth exists the way that energy exists. It can&#039;t be created or destroyed, but it can be managed. They&#039;ll collect more from the &quot;replacement&quot; of capitalism. </p>
<p>Where have you been? </p>
<p>&quot;OK, I get it now. Just had to rearrange the furniture upstairs.&quot; </p>
<p>Well, OK. Don&#039;t forget the biggest fallacy that is applied to this criticism is thinking it is invalid because the theories are bad. We know the theories are bad, that is a major reason for the criticism. It won&#039;t work, but they believe they will come out meeting their objectives. If they added it all up logically before trying to sell it, we wouldn&#039;t have any problems with these radicals. If it did have any chance to work, we wouldn&#039;t be so upset. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3963781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 02:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3963781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s see if I understand.  The Democratic party is anti-democratic and anti-majority rule because it was voted into power by the majority of the voters which is actually just a coalition of minorities that slyly pose as a majority by being greater in numbers than the real majority.  Not only that but the representatives of this bogus majority that&#039;s really a minority want to work within the system so they can later blow it up and then collect a pension from the system they just blew up. 
 
OK, I get it now.  Just had to rearrange the furniture upstairs. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#039;s see if I understand.  The Democratic party is anti-democratic and anti-majority rule because it was voted into power by the majority of the voters which is actually just a coalition of minorities that slyly pose as a majority by being greater in numbers than the real majority.  Not only that but the representatives of this bogus majority that&#039;s really a minority want to work within the system so they can later blow it up and then collect a pension from the system they just blew up. </p>
<p>OK, I get it now.  Just had to rearrange the furniture upstairs. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Greenfield</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3963582</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Greenfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 01:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3963582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s the common story in any case. It&#039;s not 100 percent clear if it&#039;s true or just a great story.  
 
But in any case that line was a reference to a Spanish policeman reportedly believing Tweed was a kidnapper or child abuser based on the Nast cartoon. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s the common story in any case. It&#039;s not 100 percent clear if it&#039;s true or just a great story.  </p>
<p>But in any case that line was a reference to a Spanish policeman reportedly believing Tweed was a kidnapper or child abuser based on the Nast cartoon. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3963425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3963425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s go paragraph by paragraph. Did you understand the first one? If yes, tell me where your confusion started. If not, I&#039;ll &quot;translate&quot; the first one in English you can likely understand. We&#039;ll go as slowly as you need to. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#039;s go paragraph by paragraph. Did you understand the first one? If yes, tell me where your confusion started. If not, I&#039;ll &quot;translate&quot; the first one in English you can likely understand. We&#039;ll go as slowly as you need to. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3963418</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3963418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Democratic democracy these days is defined by mob rule, as long as they control the mob. See the &quot;Occupy &lt;this&gt;&quot; movement. It&#039;s why they love jihadis, because they think they control the &quot;grievance resolution&quot; process. It&#039;s why they create class victims. They want to create angry mobs who see them as the solution. 
 
Democracy? Not by any Western tradition or standard. Only the most cynical definition of democracy can be used. Yet they do, and they apply it to sharia too, so what does that tell you? I&#039;m not joking that Saudi Arabia has been described on PBS as a &quot;kind of democracy&quot; because on occasion, the men sit around together in one room and beg the king for favors. 
 
I&#039;m not joking. They are so dim. All of them. You can&#039;t be bright and also go along with this stuff. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democratic democracy these days is defined by mob rule, as long as they control the mob. See the &quot;Occupy &lt;this&gt;&quot; movement. It&#039;s why they love jihadis, because they think they control the &quot;grievance resolution&quot; process. It&#039;s why they create class victims. They want to create angry mobs who see them as the solution. </p>
<p>Democracy? Not by any Western tradition or standard. Only the most cynical definition of democracy can be used. Yet they do, and they apply it to sharia too, so what does that tell you? I&#039;m not joking that Saudi Arabia has been described on PBS as a &quot;kind of democracy&quot; because on occasion, the men sit around together in one room and beg the king for favors. </p>
<p>I&#039;m not joking. They are so dim. All of them. You can&#039;t be bright and also go along with this stuff. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghostwriter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3962934</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghostwriter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3962934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d like to correct one bit of misinformation in the article. I read about this when I was in junior high and high school. Boss Tweed wasn&#039;t brought back because he was a child molester. He was brought back because the Spanish authorities thought that he kidnapped two children from the U.S. One of the main reasons that Tweed and his pals were brought down was because of the cartoons of Thomas Nast,the German-born cartoonist who often attacked Tweed and his activities. One of his cartoons aided in the aforementioned return of Tweed to America. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;d like to correct one bit of misinformation in the article. I read about this when I was in junior high and high school. Boss Tweed wasn&#039;t brought back because he was a child molester. He was brought back because the Spanish authorities thought that he kidnapped two children from the U.S. One of the main reasons that Tweed and his pals were brought down was because of the cartoons of Thomas Nast,the German-born cartoonist who often attacked Tweed and his activities. One of his cartoons aided in the aforementioned return of Tweed to America. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3962885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3962885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[10 bucks to anyone who can translate this incredibly incoherent rant into English. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10 bucks to anyone who can translate this incredibly incoherent rant into English. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3962711</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary Sue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3962711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[don&#039;t worry, those decrepit major cities are still run by White Men, and that&#039;s good enough for Jay-Z. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#039;t worry, those decrepit major cities are still run by White Men, and that&#039;s good enough for Jay-Z. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marios</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3962480</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marios]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 19:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3962480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[anyway with all Rep&#039;s gaffes and faults they are  Americans who are for Funding Fathers America incomparably with  Dem&#039;s who are socialists who thristy for Power for ever and don&#039;t care about  our country  at all.  We cannot equat  them. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anyway with all Rep&#039;s gaffes and faults they are  Americans who are for Funding Fathers America incomparably with  Dem&#039;s who are socialists who thristy for Power for ever and don&#039;t care about  our country  at all.  We cannot equat  them. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JakeTobias</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/the-anti-democratic-party-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3962370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JakeTobias]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=166840#comment-3962370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beautiful summation. But I would change one line: &quot;...a dissolute upper class of Republican opposition and a working class population that hates BOTH their guts, but has no idea how to get rid of them.&quot;   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful summation. But I would change one line: &quot;&#8230;a dissolute upper class of Republican opposition and a working class population that hates BOTH their guts, but has no idea how to get rid of them.&quot;   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 712/748 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 22:19:34 by W3 Total Cache -->