The Future of Freedom of Speech in America

As the Death to America riots continue to unfold, four approaches are evolving toward the future of freedom of speech in America.

1. Accept that we are part of a global society and that a billion Muslims get a vote on what we can and cannot say. Laws can no longer be adapted to individual nations, but must reflect global concerns and a global consensus. Freedom of speech may be an American approach, but it is no longer feasible in a global connected society.

2. Apologize for freedom of speech without actually outlawing it, but while still asking people to avoid speech that may cause violent offense. This is the middle ground that integrates the first option without outright violating the Bill of Rights. This is also the current Obama approach.

3. Treat freedom of speech, regardless of how offensive, as hallowed and worth dying for. Americans killed in speech riots are martyrs to that freedom of speech and their deaths will one day convince the entire world of the value of freedom of speech and the open marketplace of ideas.

4. Stop treating provocations as a legitimate reason to debate free speech. When countries or groups want to begin a war, they will choose a provocation to justify the attack. Muslims routinely choose some form of religious blasphemy which they pick out and promote and then riot over. The issue in those cases is not freedom of speech, just as Saddam Hussein did not invade Kuwait because some Kuwaiti leader said something about his mother.

Attacks on Americans should be treated as attacks, not as reactions to something else, as the left would like us to do. It doesn’t really matter what the violence is motivated by, a brief review of the Muslim world shows that it is always violent and that mobs will fight over anything from a teddy bear to beards. Sunnis and Shiites have spent over a thousand years killing each other over a right of succession that stopped mattering thousands of years ago.

Debates over the cause of the violence play into the hands of the violent by allowing them to define the terms on which the violence happens and then to demand appeasement. This is a loser’s game and if we play it, then we lose.

  • pagegl

    Those in our country who would attempt to limit our freedom of speech to mollify Muslims are traitors.

  • Mullah be Damned


  • Mullah be Damned

    There will be no more deaths over free speech when we completely abandon and isolate the countries in question.

  • YLEM

    It's like this… It doesn't matter if Obama and Gang are completely incompetent or whether they're smart and know exactly what they're doing. What matters is that America's outcome is the same.

  • YLEM

    It's like this.. It doesn't matter if Obama is destroying America because of incompetence or on purpose — the outcome for America is the same. IMPEACH OBAMA NOW. WE CANNOT WAIT.

  • JakeTobias


  • AKH

    The pornography is still acceptable, it is any criticism of Islam that no longer appears to be so.

  • @The_Hiking_Guy

    It will be a great Tragedy when America invokes its 2nd Amendment Right to save the Republic from Liberals …

  • granba

    Freedom of Speech is not a Right or Left or Middle issue. It is American. When it comes to something as fundamental to the continuance of America, Freedom of Speech must not be claimed as belonging to one party or another. It belongs to all. It makes America strong.

    And the same holds true for all of our Freedoms.

  • Our site

    I learned more new stuff on this weight-loss issue.
    One issue is that good nutrition is extremely vital whenever dieting.
    A massive reduction in bad foods, sugary
    ingredients, fried foods, sweet foods, pork, and bright flour products may be necessary.
    Keeping wastes parasites, and toxic compounds may prevent desired goals for fat-loss.
    While specified drugs briefly solve the situation, the horrible side effects are usually
    not worth it, and they also never give more than a short-lived solution.
    It’s a known fact that 95% of diet plans fail. Many thanks sharing your notions on this blog site.

  • thinkfirst

    “Debates over the cause of the violence play into the hands of the
    violent by allowing them to define the terms on which the violence
    happens and then to demand appeasement. This is a loser’s game and if we
    play it, then we lose”

    1. If we want to control effects, discovering their causes is generally indispensable. That is a matter of pure logic.

    2. Failure to consider the causes amounts an unwillingness to consider the possibility that defects in your mode of conduct have precipitated events.

    3. Recognizing that you have acted in ways that precipitated violence does not amount to admitting that the violence was justified. It does, however, consider a real possibility. After all, ignoring it does not make it go away. Finding causes is usually the best ways to control effects.

    The idea that causes do not matter is completely crazy!