The High Price of Telling the Truth About Islam

Pages: 1 2

As a last attempt I showed them footage of the Imam in Murfreesboro condoning stoning, admitting that Mohammed had stoned someone to death, saying that women cannot be trusted with money because they are irrational.  Then I pointed out that a board member of the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro was investigated after pictures from his MySpace page had surfaced indicating his strong sympathies for Hamas.  I was reminded that Hamas was also a political party which was voted in Democratically and that I needed to make a choice – either stick with the original blueprint or else give the money back and go find myself another backer.  So I did.  I walked.  If I can’t make an honest documentary then I’m in the wrong business.  I didn’t want to add to more of the noise that’s out there – I wanted to make something that told the truth, even if that truth is hard to swallow.

It’s funny because I run a website called Global One TV, which has had about 23 million visitors so far, and the theme of this blog is that “Inward Revolution Creates Outward Revolution”.  And here I was having to take my own medicine.  My own inward revolution – the questioning of one’s conclusions in search of a deeper truth – had led me to a very strange place.  I thought of the famous Nietzsche quote that says “When you look into the abyss, the abyss also looks into you”.  And with nothing left to lose, I used my position at Daily Kos to go about telling the truth.

In January of 2012 I wrote 3 consecutive articles for the Daily Kos.  The first was entitled “ and Radical Islam”.  Here I pointed out the how Loonwatch only deflects criticism of radical Islam.  I was also critical of Islamic theology while noting over and over that most Muslims were peaceful.  The comments section of Daily Kos made me feel like I was attending my own funeral.  It was like a public stoning.   There wasn’t much in the way of responding to any of the points laid out in my article but hundreds of comments accusing me of being “right wing” a “bigot” and an “lslamophobe”.  This was disappointing.

The next day I received an email from with an article showing my name and a photograph of my face, going out to much of the Islamic world, calling me the “Loon at Large”.  This article was picked up by and – later being repurposed by numerous Islamic blogs around the world, including in places where we all know what happens to anyone who is perceived to be the enemy of Allah or who dares to “insult” Islam.

My next article sought to further substantiate my point with regard to these wolves in sheep’s clothing calling themselves “Islamophobia Watchdog sites” and their first line of defense, that being a blogosphere of liberal lemming infidels who are pre-programmed to blurt out the word “Islamophobe” on cue.  That article was called “How and Why Loonwatch is a Terrorist Spin Control Network”.  And as you might have guessed, this piece was met with the same mob mentality of those who, rather than read the article and criticize it on its merits, instead shot the messenger with charges of “Islamophobia”.  There were also 2 Daily Kos articles written in response attacking me personally, another Loonwatch article where someone suggested I must be from TN and have no education, etc.  And once again, my name was put out on the street through a network of Islamic Blogs, including the landing page for CAIR, using a form of Islamic double speak which translated to any serious Jihadist means “enemy of Allah” and “insulting Islam”.

Given the incredible density of the popular Liberal mind, how the readers of my articles were unable to see how the beliefs of Islam were in direct conflict with human rights, gay rights, women’s rights and basic Democratic Values, I wrote a final piece called, “Are You In Favor of Human Rights?” and that one of course got me banned from Daily Kos.  It should be noted that in one of the articles the author, a person simply calling himself “Danios” demanded that DKOS silence me and provided a link for its readers to email the editors of the Daily Kos, demanding that this “Islamophobe” be censored.  And it worked – once again proving the oil and water relationship between Islam and tolerance for free speech.

Things got even stranger from there.  Robert Spencer himself wrote me an email and we had a rather interesting dialogue.  It became apparent almost immediately that there was nothing about this man that was even remotely hateful.  So when Robert Spencer asked if I minded if he reprint my email in response to his on Jihad Watch, I said “sure, why not?”  Once that surfaced, the friend count on my Facebook fan page dropped suddenly.  Friends and acquaintances told me I had become a hatemonger, a fear monger and an Islamophobe.  I pointed out that an Islamophobe is someone with an irrational fear of Islam but there was no reasoning with anyone so deeply indoctrinated into the tyranny of political correctness.

And almost right on cue the news story broke about the NYPD using as a training video a documentary narrated by a devout Muslim who opposes terrorism and jihad, someone who has advised law enforcement and served in the military and as a physician to highly placed members of the United States government.  That documentary was called “The Third Jihad” and the story surfaced that CAIR was calling this film “Islamophobic” and demanding that the NYPD pull it right away, which of course they did.  CAIR demanded the removal of the head of the NYPD and the liberal blogosphere sang backup – most notably with articles on Huffington Post calling “The Third Jihad” propaganda, hate speech and of course more “Islamophobia”.  When I posted a link to this documentary on my Facebook page I was met with more charges of being an Islamophobe by  people who had only recently told me how much they had been inspired and influenced by my writings.

After Jamie Glazov of – part of the David Horowitz Freedom Center – reached out to me to ask me to be on his radio show (which I agreed to) I surfed the web a bit trying to get a better sense of who exactly David Hororwitz was.  It became clear almost immediately that we do not share the same political views, but one thing Horowitz did say that came through with stunning clarity was an assertion that there was an unholy alliance between the Left and Islam, with radical Islam using the Liberal media to create a smoke screen for it – a place where radical can appear moderate and receive Liberal support.  He also went on to say that in many universities across America that students were being radicalized, indoctrinated into the far Left.  And I remembered something.  Nearly all of the organizers for the college aged activist group who demonstrated in favor of the new mosque in Murfreesboro were either Socialists or Communists.  These were kids and they all seemed to share one Professor in particular who was something of a mentor to them, a Socialist who always seemed to be hanging around their college parties, infiltrating into their social scene, taking the smarter and more articulate ones under his wing as their campus group called simply “Solidarity” grew in numbers – in fact recruiting quite a few students while organizing in favor of the mosque.  Yikes.

So here we are today, as news that Kuwait goes Islamist and the NYPD answers to CAIR, an arm of a terrorist organization, out of concern for political correctness.  Have I become a Conservative out of all of this?  Not really.  I still oppose the invasion of Iraq.  I still feel that all wars should be avoided unless absolutely necessary.  I still think that George W. Bush was one of the worst things to happen to America in my lifetime.  I still support marriage equality.  But I’m also still pro-life.  Do you see a trend here?  I support human rights and oppose anything which I perceive to be in violation of human rights.

Where do I stand on Islam?  Let’s look at its founder – a man who raped a 9 year old girl, a slave owner, a leader who ordered people to be tortured, for adulterers to be stoned, for countless nonbelievers to be beheaded, a killer, a warmonger who spread his “religion of peace” by the sword, a man who suffered from hallucinations of voices telling him to do violent things, a tyrant, a homicidal maniac perhaps the equivalent of 100,000 Osama Bin Ladens.  And this sadistic lunatic is considered to be the “ideal man” in Islam.  What more needs to be said about Islam than that?

So in this climate where innocent people are killed when Korans are burned, when there are riots and bomb threats and killings over cartoons that offend Muslims, when a novelist such as Salman Rushdie is advised by Indian intelligence authorities that it is unsafe for him to enter the country to attend the world’s largest literary festival, when Muslims outside the festival threaten violence such that the festival organizers decide to cancel even patching in a video of Rushdie for the conference, in a world where a man, Theo Van Gough, was shot a couple dozen times in broad daylight, then stabbed, then had a sword rammed into his heart on the sidewalk of a European street simply for making a 10 minute film about the mistreatment of Muslim women – in such a world that is constantly terrorized by Islamic militants whose insanity is co-opted by an army of Liberal bloggers who make excuses for them – who tell us that 911 was probably our fault – what will become of my documentary when I finish it?

How will “Not Welcome” be received?  Will movie theaters refuse to show it, just like those many bookstores who removed the Danish cartoons from their shelves?  Will film festivals be afraid to screen it?  Will my life be in danger?  Will some lunatic Islamic cleric issue a Fatwa ordering my death?  Will CAIR gain even more political influence and work within the system to get it banned as “hate speech”?  Will critics fear for their lives and thus refuse to review it?

Is the Liberal view that Stealth Jihad is just some whacky conspiracy theory really true?  Who will win – free speech or the savagery of a growing mob hell bent on Jihad?  I can only tell you this.  I will not back down.  I will not be bullied, threatened, coerced or terrorized by the “religion of peace”.

We each have a responsibility to the other people on this planet, and especially to those whom we will leave this planet to after we are gone.  And this sometimes means taking an unpopular stand in order to protect the rights of innocent people.  Loonwatch, CAIR and the other numerous terrorist spin control networks – you’ve not seen the end of me.  Not by a long shot.  As the saying goes, “You have a right to swing your fists, but that right ends when your fist connects with my nose”.

And by the way, I still believe that unless they break the law, the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro has a legal right to build their house of worship.  We don’t have to like it, but then again the First Amendment was designed not to protect popular ideas – as they don’t need protecting – but to protect unpopular ideas as well. This is something you won’t find in any Islamic country and it is also something worth protecting  – even when the so-called “religion of peace” tries to shut you down.


Eric Allen Bell

Eric Allen Bell is a writer and filmmaker. His directorial debut, a short film entitled “Missing Sock” was placed on Film Threat’s prestigious “Top 10 Short Films” of 2004. He went on to direct his first full length feature, “The Bondage” which premiered at the South By South West Film Festival, receiving multiple offers and securing full theatrical distribution. His current project, a documentary entitled “Not Welcome” chronicles the backlash concerning the building of a 53,000 square foot mega-mosque in the middle of America’s Bible Belt.  He can be reached at:

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here

Pages: 1 2

  • denny

    We need more intellectual honesty from both liberals and conservatives, the United States has degenerated into sound bite mentality.

  • jima9426

    D'Alexis de Tocqueville probably said it best in "Democracy in America" when he wrote, “Muhammad brought down from heaven and put into the Koran not religious doctrines only, but political maxims, criminal and civil laws, and scientific theories. The Gospels, on the other hand, deal only with the general relations between man and God and between man and man. Beyond that, they teach nothing and do not oblige people to believe anything. That alone, among a thousand reasons, is enough to show that Islam will not be able to hold its power long in ages of enlightenment and democracy, while Christianity is destined to reign in such ages, as in all others.”

  • Steph

    Well done Eric, go to it! You are on the right path.

  • Elsa_is_Elsa

    Hi Eric, Reading your story I was struck by what a familiar journey you've taken – from accepting the popular view of Islam and Islamophobes, to a radically different view of Islam, the Qu'ran, and organizations like the Muslim Brotherhood, and along with that, a different view of the liberal West. I'm glad you've had the courage to take this journey and are also doing what you can to reach through to people with what you're discovering.

  • BoSSspy

    Wow! ..can't believe I read every comment. It took until page 11 when (RandomUK) finally touched on what I was thinking. While I'm not a Liberal , I'm fully aware that the true liberal is not a great threat me, my country or my freedom. Liberals have been used by the radical left to advance a totalitarian agenda that no liberal or conservative should stand for. we are not as far apart as those with an agenda would have us believe.
    I'm a non religious conservative I'm tolerant of modern religion because I believe it does more good than harm!
    I have 0 tolerance for the radical left which only goal seems to be to control all of humanity and for them to conform to their religion (radical environmentalism)! Now that your mind is freed, I think you'll find conservatives to be far more open-minded than your soon to be ex friends on the left!

  • Mary

    Welcome to the Libertarian Party, Eric.

  • Miville

    No liberty without responsibility. No equality without reciprocity. No brotherhood without border-hood. Any cult from any country wanting to install his buildings in another religion's stronghold should not be authorized to do so until the country it stems from decides likewise to authorize the other religion to build its buildings on its own soil. If you want to open a Saudi-style mosque in the Midwest, let as many midwestern-style protestant church buildings and pews be opened for cult in Saudi Arabia, otherwise no mosque functioning as per the Saudi law or with Saudi funds should be authorized. If you want to open a Moroccan-style mosque right next door to the Vatican, let a catholic church be built in Mecca right next door the Hassan II mosque in Casablanca. The reverse is also true : if your intention is to conquer Haiti to midwestern-style protestantism, you should open voodoo peristyles in the Midwest for the Black community, but in the latter case there would be no great problem, for real voodoo, apart from its negative Hollywood image, is practically a kind of carnaval-like naive catholicism far less hateful to non-Blacks than many Black churches, and in the middle run voodoo would become a Black church like any other. If you set up communist organizations, let us be sure the communist country they stem from allows American capitalist organizations for its own people.

  • livingengine

    Eric Allen Rubbish.

  • livingengine

    Eric Allen Bell and His Cars.

    Do you remember when Eric told us he had to sell his car because he told the
    truth about Islam?

    I remember. I don’t even like the guy, and I cringed when I heard that.

    Well, consider the following time line. . . .

    Here, Eric tells us that he likes “shiny things”.

    Eric likes BMW’s, of course, he would. – [EAB Facebook 2011]

    By Dec 12, 2011 – Eric no longer owns a car. He is going to put the money
    into GlobalOne. – [EAB Facebook 2011]

    And, on February 7, 2012 he was reporting – ” I was driving in my car
    listening to a story on NPR. ”

    Let us assume this story took place earlier in 2011, before he sold the car
    he drove to Murfreeseboro.

    Then on July 4, 2012 he is selling his car again, ” I had to sell my
    car in order to pay my rent – and it’s that money is now gone.”

    So, what happened here? He sold one car in 2011, and another in July of
    2012, seven months later? Did someone give him a car after he sold in 2011?

    By SEPTEMBER 11, 2012 , He is driving again. – ” I spent the night at a
    motel and got on to the freeway for a long drive home, after the traffic had
    let up.”

    Maybe, it was a rental.

    In any event, in May of 2013 it appears people are commenting on Eric’s nice
    car. Is it a late model BMW, by any chance?

    “STRANGE DAYS INDEED: Either my freak magnet is
    working double time this past week, or something is up. This is the third time
    a stranger in a cafe has sort of awkwardly insisted on making conversation with
    me, regarding the very things we talk about here. This time the person mentions
    my car, parked outside, and makes a point to tell me they kow the color and
    model of the car. ” EAB – 5/1/2013

    Eric is sweating bullets here. He posts the following, 5 times in less than
    4 minutes.

    “If anyone tries to do anything to me it will be THE ISLAMIC CENTER OF
    MURFREESBORO and Nihad Awad of CAIR.” – EAB 5/1/2013

    Is Eric’s consternation the result of a guilty conscience? He can’t make the
    connection between his car, and his statement in July.

    Why didn’t he tell anyone “I have a car now, thank you.”

    Where did the car come from?

    ” No, the truth here is that Eric Allen Bell offers no reason for anyone
    to believe anything that comes out of his mouth (or keyboard). ” – David
    Christopher 2010

  • livingengine

    Again with the hype, and phoney death threats. There is no excuse for this.

  • livingengine

    Eric Allen Bell’s description of the exchanges between himself, and his “backers” is not true. EAB did not know about CAIR’s connections to the Holy Land Foundation until late January 2012 when I told him about it.

    This is just one example of how Eric Allen Bell does not hold up to scrutiny.

  • Rachel

    Well, Eric…you’ve got the “make excuses for Islam” and “death to Islamophobes” haters here in your comment section. LOL…what a surprise. No worries, mate….we discount everything that comes out of CAIR’s mouth as a LIE, which it is. Anyway, Eric….now you know how Conservatives feel constantly being labeled racists, homophobes, Islamophobes just for having common sense and telling the truth. I guess we are just impervious to indoctrination.

    • livingengine

      Poor Rachel has absolutely no idea what is going on.

      • Rachel

        Oh yes, Living…I’m the one who has no idea what’s going on. I was born yesterday. I haven’t read and read and read. I didn’t pass my Logic courses in college. I have zero common sense. I have NOOOOOoooo idea what’s going on. I look to geniuses like YOU for guidance…right off the cliff.

        • livingengine

          Well, despite what you say, you don’t have any idea what I am talking about. Furthermore, you are defending someone who is thoroughly discredited. I have more evidence that EAB is a fraud. What do you have?

  • sims

    Great article; very truthful. America better wake up before it is too late.

  • livingengine

    the fraud of Eric Allen Bell

  • Verum

    Very impressive! Eric Allen Bell speaks the truth regardless of the consequences to his reputation or career.