Pages: 1 2
And there had been little mention of Obama’s plans to roll out the red carpet, for the Muslim Brotherhood leader of Egypt, a terrorist organization that our President has furnished with $1,500,000,000 of our tax dollars. Yes you, hardworking tax payer, fund Islamic terrorism.
Hamas and Al Qaeda, are extensions of the Muslim Brotherhood. And somehow the White House has chosen to overlook the glaring connections between multiple “legal” Islamic organizations and Islamic terrorist groups – all of which are tentacles of the Muslim Brotherhood.
And it does command, in the Islamic scriptures, that the non-believers must pay the non-Muslim tax “with willing submission” and this is clearly something Barack Hussein Obama has chosen to do, and he has done so in our name. He and his policies continue to make Dhimmis and fools out of all of us.
Speaking of the Muslim Brotherhood, here is what Obama’s new allies have to say on their official English speaking website about the violence that is directed at Americans in response to this film:
“such acts will continue to cause devout Muslims across the world to suspect and even loathe the West, especially the USA, for allowing their citizens to violate the sanctity of what they (Muslims) hold dear and holy. Hence, we (the Muslim Brotherhood) demand that all those involved in such crimes (free speech) be urgently brought to trial”. The Muslim Brotherhood, Cairo – September 12, 2012.
So, it appears that the Muslim Brotherhood is demanding that the US government halt our right to free speech – as it pertains to their “prophet.” A shorter and more and simple way of saying this would be that, the Muslim Brotherhood demands that America become Sharia-compliant.
The Muslim Brotherhood is not the only massive Islamic organization seeking to force the free world to submit to Islam. The Organization of Islamic Cooperation (the OIC, an Islamic organization comprised of about 57 states, who use their massive petro dollars to bully the Human Rights Commission within the UN) is demanding similar international legislation, to ban our right to free speech, as it applies to “mocking the prophet.”
Mohammed Karzai, the American installed, Muslim President of Afghanistan, condemned the movie as an insult to all Muslims. In fact, as quoted in the Guardian UK, Karzai called for “efforts to prevent the release of this insulting film”, but did not call for restraint in demonstrations, or criticise the rioting, or the death of the US ambassador in Libya. Instead he said the production would fan tension, and called for the film to be banned.”
LoonWatch.com – the terrorist spin control network, disguised as an “Islamophobia watchdog site” spun the story with careful wording, making sure to indicate that an “Israeli-American” had engaged in “hate movie” which had “provoked” some “protest” on the part of offended Muslims. The next day, that same terrorist spin-control network, ran a headline which promised to tell offended Muslims, the world over, the true identity and location of the filmmaker who made the “hate movie” against the “prophet”. That sounds familiar. They kind of did something similar to me, back in February of 2012.
American newspapers, such as USA Today, Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post, have called for restrictions on freedom of speech, as it pertains to offending Muslims. The “reasoning” here goes something like this: Since we just know that Muslims have no choice but to riot, storm embassies, sodomize and kill American diplomats, rip apart our flag and burn buildings to the ground, making a film for YouTube which “mocks the prophet” is clearly intended to incite violence, and therefore is not protected under the First Amendment of the US Constitution. It would be, according to this line of thinking, the equivalent of yelling “fire” in a crowded room.
Secretary of State, Hilary Clinton, came right to the defense… of the enemy – calling the film “disgusting and reprehensible.” She says it is a cynical attempt to offend people for their religious beliefs. Does she say that every time Christianity, Judaism and other religions get lampooned? What sharp criticism did the State Department issue against the Broadway hit musical, “The Book of Mormon”? Crickets. A lone tumbleweed rolls in the breeze, while Donny and Marie Osmond peacefully go on with their lives.
The denial syndrome of the American Left, with regard to Political Islam, tragically resembles the scenario of the abusive husband, who beats his wife and then says, “Now look what you made me do!” And the wife tries to deny it even happened. Then she says, he wasn’t really being his real self. “That’s not the man I know”. And then finally, she blames herself.
Meanwhile, another Muslim Facebook group posts a picture of Ambassador Christopher Stevens. This was the American Diplomat, who was sodomized and then murdered, by offended Muslims. This picture, found on Facebook, shows his face on the body of a pig here. And once again, Facebook finds nothing wrong with this, but my account is suspended for the status update I showed you above.
Islam means “submission” and it demands that the entire world submit to Islamic Law, also known as the “Sharia.” Facebook has over 900 million members. Has the world of Political Islam forced 900 million new people to become Sharia compliant?
Here is the message I received last night, from Facebook, letting me know that my account had been suspended due to the “offensive” message I had posted on 9/11/2012:
“We removed content you posted. We removed the following content you posted because it violates Facebook’s Statement of Rights and Responsibilities.”
Make no mistake about it. The mandate of Political Islam is to force the entire world to submit to Islam. Islam is war. We are at war. And the sooner we can figure that out and accept it, the sooner we can stand up to this threat and defeat it. And we must defeat it. And we must not fail.
Eric Allen Bell
Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.
Pages: 1 2