Christian Slaughter in Nigeria

Pages: 1 2

Are they terrorists yet? Boko Haram, an Islamist sect seeking to impose Sharia throughout Nigeria, attacked three church services on Sunday, April 29, 2012. The latest slaughters added twenty-seven more dead to 900+ victims of the past two years’ efforts by Boko Haram to kill all the Christians in northern Nigeria. In recent months, the sect has also been marking the houses of Christians in the north, targeting them for killing, forcing thousands to flee from their homes.

On the morning of April 29, Boko Haram struck Catholic and Protestant worship services simultaneously at Bayero University in Kano. Twenty-two so farhave been confirmed dead, and twenty-three wounded. In the evening they attacked a church service in Jere, near Maiduguri, Borno State, killing another five people.

U.S. Congressmen Peter King (R-NY), Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, and Patrick Meehan (R-PA) recently wrote to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, urging that she designate the group as a terrorist organization. Meehan’s Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence released an extensive, bi-partisan report on Boko Haram as an “emerging threat to the U.S. Homeland.” But the State Department continues to downplay Boko Haram’s Islamist nature, preferring to see the terrorist murderers – of whom even the Nigerian police are afraid – as victims of poverty and marginalization.

One survivor of the April 29 attack on the Catholic Mass was a geography professor, Emmanuel Olofin. Olofin reported that Mass had just gotten underway in the university indoor sports complex at 8:10 AM when the worshippers heard the sound of “gunshots and pellets falling on the roof of the building.” According to reports, the attackers arrived in a car and two motorcycles. They threw explosives into the building and sent people into a panic. They fled from the building, straight into the attackers’ line of fire.

Professor Olofin, age 71, leaped over an eight-foot fence instead of using the actual exit in the gate. “I believe that most of the people that died were those who took the pedestrian exit because it seemed as if the attackers used the pedestrian gate to gain entrance,” said Olofin, who found refuge under a tree. Among the dead were two of Olofin’s university colleagues, Professors Jerome Ayodele, Department of Chemistry, and Andrew Leo Ogbonyomi, Library Science.

At the same time the attack on the Catholics was taking place, other members of the sect attacked the Chapel of Victory Protestant church service, meeting outdoors near the Faculty of Medicine. Professor Julius Falola, who was preaching when the Islamists arrived, recounted a horrific scene similar to that described by Professor Olofin. Explosions and gunshots were followed by fleeing church members who provided easy targets for Boko Haram killers.Falola said that some of the Christians “jumped over the fence while others ran deeper into the campus.” Falola hid in the university clinic. Falola and Olofin, as well as other witnesses, said that the police did not arrive until 10 AM. “The shooting went on for 45 minutes,” said Falola.

Boko Haram topped off their killing spree later that night, by opening fire on the Church of Christ in Nigeria parish in Jere. Because of a state of emergency in the town, worshippers had foregone meeting in the morning in favor of what they assumed would be an unnoticed and therefore less dangerous evening worship. Halfway through the service, witnesses reported that the Islamists came “in their trademark car, Volkswagen Golf, dressed in flowing gowns.” After “their routine shout of ‘Allah akbar,’ they . . .  headed straight for the altar” where they shot and killed the pastor, Reverend Albert Naga. Four others died from the attack, as well.

In response to Sunday’s targeted killing of Christians by Boko Haram, Secretary Clinton put out a paragraph on May 1, saying that the United States “strongly condemns the recent attacks on innocent civilians in Nigeria, including yesterday’s disgraceful assault during church services at Bayero University in Kano.” Clinton said that they are “concerned about attacks on churches, news media, and government installations that increasingly target innocent civilians across Northern Nigeria.” She condemned “attempts by those in Nigeria who seek to inflame Christian-Muslim tensions, and support those who recognize Nigeria’s ethnic and religious diversity as one of the country’s greatest strengths.” She concluded by saying that “Our thoughts and prayers are with the families and loved ones of those who were killed and injured.”

Pages: 1 2

  • Chezwick

    Of all the many sins of the Obama Administration, this is perhaps the most indefensible. Nigeria's Christians have suffered more than 10,000 killed in the last 12 years, far more than the Palestinians. And the motive has been singularly consistent all along…Jihad and its political corollary, the imposition of Sharia. The plainly obvious continues to be denied by Obama-Clinton in this grotesque example of foreign policy negligence.

    One hopes the Romney camp is aware of the staggering incongruity between Obama's Nigeria policy and the realities on the ground in that tortured country. Perhaps this on-going tragedy may serve at least some good in the greater scheme of things…and become an albatross around the sinking presidency of our disgrace of a Commander-in-Chief.

    • Frank E

      The POTUS is commander in chief of the military services, NOT the civilian population who he is answerable to.

      • Western Canadian

        Actually, based on his behaviour, obumer seems to think he is the commander of both…. A very dangerous failure of a man.

    • Guest

      Obama has been totally silent about the killing campaign all year long in Egypt, where tons of Coptic Christians have been slaughtered, while their army turns a blind eye. Egypt is now a cesspool. Obama abandoned Mubarak early on, a HORRIBLE decision–Mubarak prevented the Muslim Brotherhood, a GENOCIDAL group that poses as "moderate" for the suckers of the West, from gaining power. Obama was either nuts or a great supporter of radical Islam and invited the Muslim Brotherhood to run in Egypt's election, which it basically won. Now they are supporting Strict Islam. As I write, some of the most vicious and bizarre laws are facing the Egyptian Parliament. I kid you not–ONE OF THEM will allow a husband to have sex with his DEAD WIFE IF it occurs within 6 hours of death. Go figure. Sick. Another with enshrine mandatory Female Circumcision. Another bill will rescind most of the previous legislation that was enacted to protect women. Basically, Egypt: You Are Screwed! The Sex with your Dead Wife bill definitely brings the concept of "Cool" to mind, literally…

      • johnnywoods

        And where did the idea of sex with your wife`s copse come from? Of course it came from that pervert of a Prophet Mohamhead. Islam is a religion for perverts and evil beasts.

  • oldtimer

    Where is the UN council on atrocities(or what ever it's called)? This is not only religious, it's racist.

    • SCREW SOCIALISM

      It's called the UN Human Rights Council.
      http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/Pages/Curren

      The council has exemplary Human Rights members such as:
      - saudi arabia
      - china
      - malaysia
      - russia
      - cuba
      -

      • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

        Obama probably had them to several dinners with a group like that.

      • johnnywoods

        Well I feel better already after seeing who made up that august body.

  • dispozadaburka

    Obama is a psychopathic narcissist and his ideology is Islam. Funded by Muslims as was Hitler.

    Americans dont understand that the Day of Prayer that he lead for 50,000 Muslim men
    to Pray For The Soul of America was actually a surrender to Islam
    and understand that everything Holder and Hillary and all the rest of his democratic tribe
    Are acomplishing this via smoke and mirrors. Gradually as in Europe.

    As Bill Clinton said. “Obama needs four more years to complete is vision”
    If Obama completes his mission for the King of Saudi Arabia , it will be the end of all
    Christians and Jews and non-believers, everywhere.
    Those FEMA camps are starting to look very ominous.

  • BS77

    Nigeria, Somalia, Sudan, Rwanda, Zaire, Algeria, Sierra Leon…….The horror. Africa , after decades of aid and trillions in relief…remains a nightmare of corruption, primitive ignorance, violence, hatred and slaughter.

  • Marty

    africa has become a killing field where muslims can slaughter non-muslims with the support and encouragement of their governments. Interestingly, many christians, particularly from sudan, have risked their lives (and occasionally lost them) to try to get to Israel, the only place in the middle east where the christian population is increasing and prospering in a democracy. The Israelis are hated throughout the middle east and most of africa and europe because they've created the only viable democracy in their region. Israelis are the perfect target for muslims: despised because they are modern, pluralist, peaceful, middle class, secular, and Jewish.

    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

      When Al Qaida was given Libya with all it's oil revenue, who didn't see this happening?

      And why are those muslim militant cowards hiding their faces? If they're proud of their work they ought to be posing for the cameras with pride. I want a 'face of murder' sharia style.

  • Forfaka

    That the US Assisatant Secretary of State for Africa , Mr. Jonnie Carson is openly supporting Islamic terrorists
    in Nigeria calls to question the state of his faculties.He is either a facist,an anit -Christ , a Judas or he is
    quite ignorant of Islam and about the situation in Nigeria to begin with.
    The sophistication of the weaponry and the modus oparendi of Nigerian Boko Haram terrorists bears the
    hallmarks of Al Qaeda and shows that the terrorist group are not fighting for butter and bread. Ther Boko Haram
    terrorists are richly supplied and well trained.
    That the America Authorities are being circumspect at enlisting the Boko Haram as a terrorist group because
    of fears of offending Nigerian oil moguls who are of course are Northermn muslims, potrays Jonnie Carson
    as an anti-Christ.The victims of Boko Haram cold blooded mass murder are Christians and the oil in question
    comers from Christian South.Is it not possible that the Americans are in deed sponsoring islamic terrorism
    in Nigeria.?
    The arguement that terrorism in Northern Nigeria is because of poverty and marginalizaion of muslim North
    is false.The muslim North has held the sway of governance of Nigeria for about 40 years of Nigerian 52 years
    of Indepence from Great Britain.The Northern muslim leaders looted the nation and impoverished the entire
    nation.There is a granding poverty all over Nigeria.
    And besides being poor and a beggar is one of the tenets of Islam in Nigeria.Begging is a profession
    amongst muslims in Nigerian.The muslim beggars marry many wives and produce many children to beg
    and support their families. Here Mr. Jonnie Carson will agree that family planning programme will be be a
    better solution than arming the terrorists.

    • johnnywoods

      Forfaka, Don`t you know that being mentally deficient is a requirement for working in the State Department? This organization has never been noted for intelligence or even plain old common sense.

  • jacob

    Seems like Congressional subpoenas are to be ignored by OBAMA's sidekicks.
    I wonder what is Congress waiting to impeach HOLDER although I believe that under THIS Speaker of the
    House, it is just wishful thinking and that FOGGY BOTTOM's disregard for Congress request to label
    TERRORISTS genocidal Muslims in Nigeria is par for the course with anything and everything concerning
    this "Administration".

    How about subpoeaning HILLARY to respond why hasn't her abide by this request or is her Master who
    told her not to but perhaps at the most call them "INSURGENTS" as he commanded his servile media ??

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Are they terrorists yet? Are they terrorists yet? Boko Haram, an Islamist sect seeking to impose Sharia throughout Nigeria, attacked three church services on Sunday, April 29, 2012.

    No…they are not terrorists yet, because terrorism isn't an Islamic manifestation at all. Muslims instead fight jihad, which is total warfare that employs both violent and non-violent means, but primarily far more non-violent means than violent means of jihad

    Moreover, jihad is holy fighting in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme and is only waged and perpetrated by mainstream orthodox Muslims as opposed to political extremists as is the case with terrorism. Meanwhile terrorism, on the other hand, can be for any number of political causes unlike jihad and as its name implies always involves only violence in stark contrast to jihad.

    Additionally, terrorism indiscriminately targets civilian non-combatants, while jihad, on the other hand, targets specifically non-Muslim unbelievers, either civilian non-combatants that are non-Muslim unbelievers, as in the Madrid Train Bombings, or military combatants, as US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan that are also non-Muslim unbelievers, but it never ever targets civilian non-combatants indiscriminately as is the case with terrorism.

    Hence, jihad and terrorism are two mutually exclusive and very separate and distinct manifestations altogether that the writer is naively conflating together per the dictates of PC multiculturalism.

    In fact, it's only people that have been blinded by the cult of PC multiculturalism that naively believe the problem with Islamic oriented violence stems from Islamic extremists, i.e., so-called Islamists or radical Muslims, instead of mainstream orthodox Islam and mainstream orthodox Muslims. Indeed, Boko Haram isn't a terrorist group per se, as terrorism isn't even an Islamic manifestation at all. Instead, Boko Haram is a violent jihadist group, and their aim is to ethnically cleanse and subjugate the non-Muslim Christian dhimmis per the dictates of mainstream orthodox Islam to make Islam supreme.

    Hence, Boko Haram isn't an Islamist sect, i.e., a so-called radical Muslim sect, at all. Instead, it's a violent jihadists group comprised of mainstream orthodox Muslims that all strictly adhere to mainstream orthodox Islam, as opposed to so-called radical Islam, which is a PC multicultural myth as the texts and tenets of mainstream orthodox Islam are immutable.

    U.S. Congressmen Peter King (R-NY), Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, and Patrick Meehan (R-PA) recently wrote to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, urging that she designate the group as a terrorist organization

    U.S. Congressmen Peter King and Patrick Meehan are typical of America's political elites on both sides of the political aisle in that they all naively blame the problem of Islamic oriented violence on Islamic extremists, i.e., so-called Islamists and radical Muslims, that in reality are just a false PC multicultural myth. Of course, if they didn't strictly adhere to the cult of PC multiculturalism, both Congressmen would inevitably be hounded and ostracized out of office by their fellow political elites and the lamestream media.

    Meehan’s Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence released an extensive, bi-partisan report on Boko Haram as an “emerging threat to the U.S. Homeland.”

    Again, jihad and terrorism are two mutually exclusive and very separate and distinct manifestations altogether. Hence, if Meehan's subcommittee wasn't blinded to the hilt by PC multiculturalism, his subcommittee would be on counterjihad and intelligence instead.

    Further, the only reason that Boko Haram could possibly be a threat to the U.S. Homeland is because of the presence of millions of covert and deceptive jihadists already living in America as a convenient fifth column. Remove those millions of covert and deceptive jihadists from America, and Boko Haram, AQ, or any other violent jihadist group couldn't mount a threat to the U.S. Homeland. In other words, the only reason that violent jihad is even possible to be perpetrated on American soil is because of incompetent political elites like U.S. Congressmen Peter King and Patrick Meehan that are blinded to the hilt by the cult of PC multiculturalism.

    As for as the US State Department and indeed the entire federal government goes, it has been totally infiltrated by Muslim covert and deceptive non-violent jihadists and rendered more than incompetent for decades. Moreover, of course, the Obama administration is totally incompetent when it comes to protecting and defending America from the scourge of Islam, but the Bush administration was just as incompetent as the Obama administration currently is. Not to mention that the political elites on both sides of the political aisle are all equally as incompetent as well. In other words, if something doesn't drastically change in America, we are all screwed.

    • southwood

      How does it feel to be towing the PC / Obama line on them not being terrorists ? Insane.

      • Western Canadian

        No, not likely to be insane, but definitely NPD. This lout posts the same cut and paste drivel several times a week, seeming to think that a lunatic theory told a thousand times becomes the truth. You can point out Mo himself disagreeing with him, portions of the bloody and unholy koran, muslim behaviour throughout history, current military muslims all of whom/which disagree with his drivel, but he carries on anyway. As for him taking the same line as the obummer admin, it wouldn’t be suprising that he is working for them. His endless repetition of drivel, so obviously wrong (about terrorism NOT be islamic) is the same distorted lie told by obummer and company, but he can’t see it, or his paycheck relies on him not seeing it. He is sick and/or dishonest.

        • Western Canadian

          Actually, while reading this article, I wondered of the loon would show up and make his usual ass of himself. No suprise.

          • Chezwick

            Nope…he's not an Obamaton….and it's not cut-and-paste. He's just a very troubled soul who laboriously re-writes the same meme over and over, presuming – just as you suggest – that shear repetition is somehow validating.

            And what is his theorem? It's the bizarre premise that terrorism – the use of indiscriminate murder to achieve political ends – cannot apply to Muslims. His ideological world-view is so rigid, narrow and convoluted that he somehow can't conceptualize a simple reality, that terrorism is just one of many tactical expressions of Jihad. In his twisted mind, terrorism and Jihad are distinctive and irreconcilable phenomenon.

            In such a world view, when an infidel murders non-combatants, it is terrorism, but when Muslims do so, it is something entirely different. This is exactly the premise of Jihadis themselves. He's not even aware that what he is actually advocating is our own incorporation of Islamic mores and even an Islamic nomenclature. It is tantamount to saying that since Muslims view apostasy as treason, they therefore don't execute apostates, they only execute traitors. We all know otherwise because, unlike Yomama, we have retained the language of our own value-system.

            It's one thing to 'know thy enemy', it's quite another to adopt the enemy's interpretative narrative. Terrorism is – once again – the use of indiscriminate murder for political purposes. Muslims engage in it almost daily. It is just one of many forms and expressions of Jihad.

          • Western Canadian

            What really amuses(?) me about him is not just his self-induced blindness, but his writing style is so stilted and screamingly juvinile. Painful to read, regardless of content. Actually applying the concept of the meme to him is appropriate…. Scary.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Dang…you guys are having another Internet stalking party again and I wasn't even invited!

            According to Chestnut here my soul is troubled, but at least I'm not obsessed with Internet stalking fellow posters like him and his crew of merry fellow Internet stalkers have been in order to harass and pressure me because for some reason I just won't and don't conform to their group dynamics like a good little Leftwing soldier.

            Moreover, excuse me if I flat out refuse to conflate and morally equate jihad, which is total warfare that employs both violent and non-violent means, but far more covert and deceptive non-violent means of jihad relative to violent means of jihad, to terrorism, which as its name implies can only be violent, in order to morally equate all civilizations, cultures, and societies neatly together as somehow all being equal and the same per the dictates of PC multiculturalism like Chestnut here and his merry band of fellow Internet stalkers that are all addicted to emoting as opposed to rationalizing and like they have all been conditioned to do.

            Hence, if you unhinged morons prefer to remain transfixed only on violent jihad that you conflate as being terrorism and at the same time totally ignore the exponentially far greater threat to the peace and security of the West that stems from covert and deceptive non-violent jihad, such as mass Muslim immigration to the West that is really covert and deceptive non-violent jihad for the purpose of mass Muslim infiltration and stealth demographic conquest, then by all means be my guess. As I could care less what you Leftwing loons believe, as I'm a true conservative that believes first and foremost in the freedom and liberty of the individual as opposed to the collective greater good. Hence, as hard as it is for you moonbats to understand because you have all been conditioned per group-think to emote as opposed to rationalize, I'm impervious to group dynamics unlike you Leftwing schmucks. Therefore, Internet stalk away and have fun!

            His ideological world-view is so rigid, narrow and convoluted

            Why? Because I won't conform to you and your fellow Leftwing Internet stalker group's dynamics like a typical leftwing loon? Yeah right.

            In such a world view, when an infidel murders non-combatants, it is terrorism, but when Muslims do so, it is something entirely different. This is exactly the premise of Jihadis themselves.

            1) Terrorism can be for any number of political causes;

            2) As its name implies, terrorism is always only violent;

            3) Terrorism targets civilian noncombatants indiscriminately;

            4) Terrorism is perpetrated by terrorists that are political extremists only.

            1) Jihad is holy fighting in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme only, as opposed to any number of political causes like terrorism. In other words, motivation matters.

            2) Unlike terrorism, which as its name implies is always only violent, jihad is total warfare that employs both violent and non-violent means, but primarily astronomically far more covert and deceptive non-violent means of jihad relative to violent means of jihad. Hence, jihad as opposed to terrorism is much more calculated, tactical, and strategic relative to terrorism because it is in fact total warfare.

            3) Jihad specifically targets non-Muslim unbelievers, either non-Muslim unbelievers that are civilian non-combatants as in the Madrid Train Bombings or otherwise non-Muslim combatants, as in US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, in stark contrast to terrorism, which targets civilian non-combatants indiscriminately.

            4) Finally, per the dictates of Islam, i.e., the sixth and most important pillar of Islam, Sharia, and the infamous sword verses, all mainstream orthodox Muslims on earth are jihadists, otherwise they are blasphemous apostates that per the dictates of mainstream orthodox Islam must be executed. Thus, jihad is fought by mainstream orthodox Muslims only as opposed to terrorism, which is perpetrated by terrorists that are political extremists only. Of course, most people today are oblivious to covert and deceptive non-violent jihad because they have been conditioned by our news media and political elites to fear only terrorism and extremists, which as it name implies is always only violent and perpetrated by extremists.

            Unlike you moonbats I know that motivation matters and I also don't automatically conflate jihadists as being extremists, per the dictates of PC multiculturalism, because all terrorists happen to be extremists. As that inevitably misleads most people to misunderstand the true nature of the threat that emanates from Islam. Which is not from extremism as most people have been conditioned to believe and like all our political elites on both sides of the political aisle today will cluelessly affirm, but instead from mainstream orthodox Islam and mainstream orthodox Muslims and not from so-called radical Islam and so-called radical Muslim extremists, as the texts and tenets of Islam are immutable.

            Indeed, jihad is total warfare and it is not random extremism and terrorism perpetrated by Muslims for various imagined political causes, as Islamic civilization is in effect in a state of perpetual war with the non-Islamic world per the dictates of mainstream orthodox Islam to make Islam supreme. Indeed, it's the main goal, fundamental mission, and sole purpose of Islam.

            –continued below

          • ObamaYoMoma

            He's not even aware that what he is actually advocating is our own incorporation of Islamic mores and even an Islamic nomenclature.

            More delusions and emoting.

            It is tantamount to saying that since Muslims view apostasy as treason, they therefore don't execute apostates, they only execute traitors. We all know otherwise because, unlike Yomama, we have retained the language of our own value-system.

            Your analogy derived from emoting as opposed to rationalizing. Not mine.

            Terrorism is – once again – the use of indiscriminate murder for political purposes. Muslims engage in it almost daily. It is just one of many forms and expressions of Jihad.

            Almost daily…give me a break, and Muslims as opposed to Muslim extremists? Really? Not to mention that terrorism for various political motives is un-Islamic and blasphemous, which is a capital offense under Islam.

            Once a Leftwing loon, always a Leftwing loon. Not to mention that Muslims always readily denounce terrorism, but then again jihad, which is strategic and tactical total warfare as opposed to random acts of terrorism, are two mutually exclusive and very different and distinct manifestations altogether. Very apparently you are even far more delusional than I had previously already recognized.

          • Chezwick

            Who is stalking you, Skippy? Your paranoia is showing. We are just commenting on your interminably-repeated and absurd hypothesis.

            I can't be bothered scrutinizing most of your nonsense, but I will respond to two statements which stand out…

            ————————————————————————————–

            CHEZWICK: "It is tantamount to saying that since Muslims view apostasy as treason, they therefore don't execute apostates, they only execute traitors. We all know otherwise because, unlike Yomama, we have retained the language of our own value-system."

            SKIPPY: "Your analogy derived from emoting as opposed to rationalizing. Not mine."

            RESPONSE: The analogy was very appropriate. Dismissing it as "emoting" is a total cop-put, derived from an inability to address the substance of the issue.

            Muslims view apostasy as treason, just as Muslims view the deliberate targeting of non-combatants as Jihad. Rational Westerners view apostasy as an expression of conscience, just as we view the deliberate murder of non-combatants as terrorism. You on the other hand, have incorporated their language and – apparently – their ethos. On a bizarre level, you have become an Islamic apologist..

            —————————————————————————————–

            SKIPPY: "Not to mention that terrorism for various political motives is un-Islamic and blasphemous, which is a capital offense under Islam."

            RESPONSE: And here our resident guru-in-his-own-mind makes his fatal error: "…terrorism for various POLITICAL MOTIVES is un-Islamic and blasphemous".

            We all agree Sharia is a POLITICAL project. You yourself insist that Islam isn't a faith, but rather a totalitarian ideology. Mass murdering non-combatants (including POWs) to impose Sharia is therefore a POLITICAL MOTIVE and has been a signature of Islam since its inception.

            SKIPPY: "Not to mention that Muslims always readily denounce terrorism, but then again jihad, which is strategic and tactical total warfare as opposed to random acts of terrorism, are two mutually exclusive and very different and distinct manifestations altogether. Very apparently you are even far more delusional than I had previously already recognized. "

            RESPONSE: Wrong again. Notice how Skippy inserted "random" to "acts of terror". There is nothing "random" about the terror of Al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah….it is a tactic orchestrated in the service of their Jihad. Anyone familiar with the issue comprehends as much. It is only you – so bizarrely consumed with semantics – who doesn't get it.

            Check mate Skippy….just like every other time.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Who is stalking you, Skippy? Your paranoia is showing.

            Really? Then why is it always and only in response to one of my posts? Are we not supposed to notice that?

            Meanwhile, you gullible unhinged Leftwing moonbats have been stalking me intermittently and attempting to berate me for months to conform to your insane leftwing group's dynamics. Meanwhile, I'm a conservative and I don't conform to group dynamics.

            We are just commenting on your interminably-repeated and absurd hypothesis.

            Of course, any hypothesis that doesn't strictly adhere to your PC multicultural view of the world is seen as being absurd by you. However, not everyone is blinded by PC multiculturalism and Leftism the same way you are. You will just have to accept that fact.

            I can't be bothered scrutinizing most of your nonsense, but I will respond to two statements which stand out…

            Then why do you have an obsession with stalking me in order to attempt to force me into conforming to your silly, asinine, and idiotic Leftwing notions?

            The analogy was very appropriate. Dismissing it as "emoting" is a total cop-put, derived from an inability to address the substance of the issue.

            Appropriate? Only according to your leftwing worldview, which yes is derived from your conditioning to always emote as opposed to rationalizing. Meanwhile, you wouldn't know the substance of the issue even if it jumped on your lap and humped you, because you have been rendered blind via the cult of PC multiculturalism.

            Muslims view apostasy as treason, just as Muslims view the deliberate targeting of non-combatants as Jihad.

            Not really, the first and foremost tenet of Islam is that all Muslims must submit totally, completely, and unconditionally to the will of Allah where the freedom of conscience is forbidden, and Islam enforces that first and foremost tenet by making blasphemy and apostasy capital offenses. Hence, any Muslim that betrays that first and foremost tenet of Islam, per the dictates of mainstream orthodox Islam, must be executed. Indeed, if they aren't executed, the entire premise of Islam is destroyed.

            Moreover, Muslims don't indiscriminately and deliberately target civilian non-combatants, as that would constitute terrorism. Now, because jihad is in reality total warfare, in a lot of situations but not all of them, Muslims don't distinguish between non-Muslim civilian non-combatants and combatants. However, unlike terrorism, Muslims never indiscriminately target civilian non-combatants, as Muslims instead specifically target only non-Muslim unbelievers, either non-Muslim civilian non-combatants as in the Madrid Train Bombings or non-Muslin combatants as in US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. Apparently, these nuances are too minute for you to grasp.

            Rational Westerners view apostasy as an expression of conscience,

            There is no freedom of conscience in Islam, as unlike in faith-based religions there is no faith in Islam since it is 100 percent totalitarian. Indeed, see above the first and foremost tenet of Islam.

            Indeed, that's another one of your problems, in that you naively also conflate Islam with being a faith-based religion. While Islam incorporates some features of faith-based religion, primarily as a form of mind control, the reality is that Islam is really a supremacist theo-political totalitarian ideology that masquerades as being a religion to dupe gullible useful idiots like you and the gullible societies it intends to subjugate into a very draconian form of Islamic totalitarianism via mass Muslim infiltration and the eventual imposition of Sharia.

            Meanwhile, jihad is total strategic warfare as opposed to random violent acts of terrorism for various political grievances, in order to facilitate that process of making Islam supreme. In fact, jihad has been ongoing and perpetual since Islam morphed into what it is today, which is a supremacist theo-political totalitarian ideology, when Muhammad abandoned religion and turned to jihad and politics shortly after the Hijra in 622 C.E.

            –continued below

          • ObamaYoMoma

            just as we view the deliberate murder of non-combatants as terrorism.

            Indiscriminate and deliberate murder of non-combatants is terrorism you moonbat, but again jihad, in stark contrast to terrorism, specifically and only targets non-Muslim non-combatants as in the Madrid Train Bombings or non-Muslim combatants such as US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. Again, you remain totally confused because you have been rendered blind by the cult of PC multiculturalism.

            You on the other hand, have incorporated their language and – apparently – their ethos. On a bizarre level, you have become an Islamic apologist..

            Well if anyone is an Islamic apologist, read your own posts! Indeed, unlike you I don't accept or believe in the existence of so-called moderate Muslims, as you have acknowledged and disclosed you believe in on numerous occasions, because that is a very false PC multicultural myth as for as I'm concerned. I also don't believe, promote, and facilitate false PC multicultural myths the same way you do, such as Islamic violence is caused by Islamic extremists that resort to terrorism as opposed to mainstream orthodox Islam.

            In addition, you have also stated on numerous occasions that you are against mass Muslim immigration, not because it is really covert and deceptive non-violent jihad for the purpose of mass Muslim infiltration and stealth demographic conquest, but instead because you said there is no way to distinguish the so-called moderate Muslims from the so-called radical Muslims, which is ludicrous to say the least.

            Meanwhile, at the same time you are also against reversing mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage. In other words, you believe in a very false, very fantasy based, and very PC multicultural notion of Islam and as a result, you don't have the first clue.

            Moreover, to top it off because you are a stealth Leftists afflicted with group-think, you feel that it is your duty and responsibility along with your Internet buddies and fellow stalkers to stalk, berate, and harass me into conforming to your unhinged group's PC multicultural dynamics.

            And here our resident guru-in-his-own-mind makes his fatal error: "…terrorism for various POLITICAL MOTIVES is un-Islamic and blasphemous".

            We all agree Sharia is a POLITICAL project. You yourself insist that Islam isn't a faith, but rather a totalitarian ideology. Mass murdering non-combatants (including POWs) to impose Sharia is therefore a POLITICAL MOTIVE and has been a signature of Islam since its inception.

            Fatal? Wishful thinking on your part.

            Actually, Sharia, like Jihad, is intrinsic to Islam, as it is the will of Allah and the heart and soul of Islam. Meanwhile, jihad is the sixth and most important pillar of Islam. Indeed, without Sharia and Jihad Islam is destroyed. In fact, Muslims can't be imported into our country without also importing Sharia and Jihad at the same time.

            –continued below

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Meanwhile, according to your incorrect PC multicultural worldview, while Sharia is political, it is in the purview of only Islamic extremists, i.e., so-called Islamists or radical Muslims, while so-called moderate Muslims, on the other hand, reject it, or otherwise they couldn't be considered as being so-called moderate Muslims.

            With respect to jihad, it is specifically and only in the cause of Allah to make Islam supreme, which, of course, is a political motive, but unlike terrorism, which is a generic term used to classify various isolated political extremists of all stripes that resort to terrorism for various political motives, jihad, on the other hand, is specific and exclusive only to the worldwide Islamic nation, i.e., the ummah, as opposed to isolated political extremists motivated by various political motives, and is in reality total warfare that involves both violent and non-violent means, in stark contrast to terrorism, that as its name implies is always only violent. Jihad also constitutes perpetual total warfare as opposed to isolated events of terrorism motivated by various political causes.

            In addition, far more covert and deceptive non-violent jihad is employed by the Islamic world against the West relative to violent jihad, and indeed covert and deceptive non-violent jihad actually constitutes an exponentially far greater threat to the peace and security of the West relative to violent jihad, even though you are oblivious of it and even though, per the dictates of PC multiculturalism, you always conflate violent jihad as being terrorism.

            Moreover, jihad as opposed to terrorism also involves every mainstream orthodox Muslim on earth as opposed to only a few isolated political extremists here and there perpetrating terrorism for various political motives.

            Wrong again. Notice how Skippy inserted "random" to "acts of terror". There is nothing "random" about the terror of Al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah….it is a tactic orchestrated in the service of their Jihad. Anyone familiar with the issue comprehends as much. It is only you – so bizarrely consumed with semantics – who doesn't get it.

            Actually, the violent attacks perpetrated by AQ, Hamas, Hezbollah and other various organized violent jihadist groups are acts of violent jihad as opposed to random acts of terrorism perpetrated by isolated political extremists for various political motives, and just because, per the dictates of PC multiculturalism, you stupidly conflate jihad as being terrorism, doesn't make jihad terrorism. It just means that you are stupid instead.

            Now self-hating and delusional hard Leftists and anarcho kook Ron Paul acolytes also like you perceive those violent acts of jihad to be terrorist acts that are motivated in response to American interventionism stemming from capitalism and imperialism, but that's because like you they are unhinged loons. In any event, those violent acts perpetrated by the aforementioned jihadists groups are not random acts of terrorism motivated by various political causes, but instead violent acts of jihad perpetrated specifically and only in the cause of Allah to make Islam supreme.

            You see, moonbat, again jihad is total warfare that employs both violent and non-violent means of jihad fought in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme, and although it employs astronomically far more covert and deceptive non-violent jihad relative to violent jihad, it still to a much lesser extent also employs violent jihad on occasion. Moreover, the 1.6 billion strong worldwide Islamic nation, i.e., Islamic ummah, is a far cry from isolated political extremists perpetrating random terrorist acts for isolated political causes.

            Check mate Skippy….just like every other time.

            Indeed, you are a glutton for punishment. You ought to hire a whore to chain you up to a bed of nails and whip you. It would be cheaper and far less humiliating. Of course, the humiliation is what you crave and enjoy in a very sick and perverted way.

          • Chezwick

            You think by restating the same argument over and over, you are actually advancing it. This is part of your illness, Skip….

            Fallacy #1: "Not to mention that Muslims always readily denounce terrorism"

            Truth: Muslims denounce terrorism in generic rems, but refuse to denounce specific acts of terror from groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah.

            Fallacy #2: Stalking: "Then why is it always and only in response to one of my posts? Are we not supposed to notice that?"

            Truth: You make a ridiculous argument and I put in my two cents, which is certainly my right. I usually ignore your posts, but on this occasion, someone else pointed out how absurd you are, but then mistook you for an Obamaton, so I tried to set him straight. You may be ill, but you're not an Obamaton.

            Fallacy #3: "Meanwhile, you wouldn't know the substance of the issue even if it jumped on your lap and humped you, because you have been rendered blind via the cult of PC multiculturalism."

            Truth: The analogy used was spot on. If Muslims perceive apostasy as treason, then it could be readily argued – if one adopts their language and ethos – that they only execute traitors, not apostates. This is identical to your position on Jihad and terrorism. Your perceiving the world through an Islamic lens.

            Meanwhile, the above is one of two sexual references in your response today. I think we're all seeing a very revealing insight into your frustrated psyche.

            Fallacy #4: "Moreover, Muslims don't indiscriminately and deliberately target civilian non-combatants, as that would constitute terrorism."

            Truth: The ignorance expressed in the above sentence is monumental. The Taliban recently blew up a bunch of Afghan children. Al Qaeda habitually slaughters civilians in Iraq and around the world. Hezbollah and Hamas are infamous for murdering non-combatants. Only someone with a very confused set of morals could miss this.

            Fallacy #5: "Indeed, that's another one of your problems, in that you naively also conflate Islam with being a faith-based religion."

            Truth: On the contrary, I was distinguishing faith-based religion from Islam. WE see apostasy as a matter of conscience; THEY see it as treason. But your analytical capabilities are so limited, that obvious point escaped you.

            Fallacy #6:" Indiscriminate and deliberate murder of non-combatants is terrorism you moonbat, but again jihad, in stark contrast to terrorism, specifically and only targets non-Muslim non-combatants as in the Madrid Train Bombings or non-Muslim combatants such as US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan."

            Truth: Sunni groups in Iraq regularly slaughtered other Sunnis when it suited their purposes. Sunni groups in Afghanistan have regularly slaughtered other Sunnis when it suited their purposes. Your assertion that Muslims target only infidels is patently false…and an example of your afflicted myopia.

            Fallacy #7: The entirety of your final argument.

            Truth: Let me present you with a hypothesis and see if you can wrap your little mind around it…

            An anarchist group bombs a cafe in the service of their larger goal of spreading anarchy throughout the world. A Muslim group bombs a cafe in the service of their larger goal of spreading Islam throughout the world. The actions are IDENTICAL, though they are serving entirely DIFFERENT goals. BOTH are employing terrorism as a tactic.

            SKIPPY: "You ought to hire a whore to chain you up to a bed of nails and whip you. It would be cheaper and far less humiliating. Of course, the humiliation is what you crave and enjoy in a very sick and perverted way."

            RESPONSE: Very disturbing and revealing how you've sexualized the discourse. Better get some psychological counseling Skip.

          • Chezwick

            Well. I shredded your arguments, but it appears the censors here at FPM are at it again and my post might not go through. I want to re-post on two of your comments…

            OBAMAYOMMA: "Meanwhile, you wouldn't know the substance of the issue even if it jumped on your lap and humped you"

            OBAMAYOMAMA: "You ought to hire a whore to chain you up to a bed of nails and whip you. It would be cheaper and far less humiliating. Of course, the humiliation is what you crave and enjoy in a very sick and perverted way."

            I was banned a couple of months ago here at FPM for arguments I was having with Skippy. Now today I've had a post held up by the moderator. Meanwhile, I have NEVER sexualized the argument the way Skippy has done here. These words of his are very bizarre and disturbing.

            If FPM wants to ban me again, so be it. But why does Skippy have cart blanch to say whatever he wants? What are the standards?

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Well. I shredded your arguments,

            On top of an unquenchable and insatiable desire to be humiliated, you are also more than just a little delusional as well.

          • Chezwick

            To the site Administrator:

            The poster who calls himself 'Obamayomama' has resorted to some bizarre and disturbing sexual language above and yet, you ended up censoring MY comment, which contained no such language. What is the policy here at FPM regarding acceptable and unacceptable discourse? I was temporarily banned a couple of months ago for language that was nowhere near as offensive as the language referred to above. There seems to be an arbitrariness and even capriciousness in whom you decide to censor and/or ban and whom you don't. Consistency in this regard would be greatly appreciated.

          • Chezwick

            Addendum to site Administrator:

            In the interests of fairness, would you please consider re-posting my responses that were removed yesterday?

        • southwood

          The PC line on this is insane in terms of reality but it serves their devious purpose. This guy and I crossed swords before. You are right, of course, it's as if he is trying to create a truth. The koran even uses the word "terror". I saw AG Holder a few years back try to deny that the terrorism was being perpetrated by Muslims.It was sickening to watch his twisted face and listen to the garbage but it looks like he is in trouble over Fast and Furious. Good.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            The koran even uses the word "terror".

            Only in the context of fear. Indeed, please explain why violent jihad, which appears to be identical and as ruthless as terrorism, can't strike fear in the hearts of its victims?

            Not to mention that the word terror is an imprecise translation of the classic Arabic language to the English language. Meanwhile, the English language doesn't contain similar and comparable words necessary to adequately translate from classic Arabic. Indeed, talk to anyone that has studied classic Arabic and that has also read the Koran in classic Arabic, and they will all tell you that the Koran as read in classic Arabic as opposed to in English translations reads far more malevolent, violent, cruel, ruthless, and brutal in comparison.

            Moreover, you unhinged moonbat, you really mean that I'm antithetical to political correctness, not the other way around, as I can promise you that Obama's worldview and my worldview are diametrically opposed. Very apparently you aren't even astute enough to pick that up.

          • intrcptr2

            "…the Koran as read in classic Arabic as opposed to in English translations reads far more malevolent, violent, cruel, ruthless, and brutal in comparison. …"

            So you're admitting that Muslims who study and obey the "proper" Quran are fed a diet far uglier (And manically bloodthirsty) than those who do not know Arabic?

            Great
            Now how does this jibe with your earlier diatribe?

  • Linda Rivera

    In refusing to designate these barbaric savages, as a terrorist organization, our government is obviously far more concerned about protecting the REPUTATION of these savage Muslim killers, than they are concerned about PROTECTING non-Muslim innocents.

    America and other nations have a moral responsibility to provide Nigeria's non-Muslims with weapons and hand grenades and whatever else is required to protect these defenseless innocents from these vicious, Muslim terrorist predators.

    One the Muslim populations have increased enough in Western countries, how long will it be before the same barbaric attacks happen in our nations?

  • Linda Rivera

    "The government of President Goodluck Jonathan has been asking the United States for help in dealing with Boko Haram and other terrorists, but so far the U.S. State Department has talked of providing financial aid to impoverished and marginalized youth, like Boko Haram."

    God help Nigeria's non-Muslims! The wicked goal of our government is to FINANCE MUSLIM TERRORISM against non-Muslim innocents.

  • wctaqiyya

    Somebody please send those Nigerian Christians a memo. In the memo, gently suggest that they arm themselves, train themselves in the use of weapons and START DEFENDING THEMSELVES! Enough already with that passive, victim mentality everybody except the Muslims seem to be laboring under. It's real simple, shoot back.

    • ynot

      When virtue is lost, benevolence appears, when benevolence is lost right conduct appears, when right conduct is lost, expedience appears. Expediency is the mere shadow of right and truth; it is the beginning of disorder.
      Lao Tzu

    • WilliamJamesWard

      Missionary friends in Africa understand that the National government must be who fights
      back and this means slow or no change in the dangers. What the indigenous Chritian peoples
      do to protect themselves is flee and live in perpetual suffering and loss. To fight back they
      would need training and equipment but who is going to give this to them considering those
      who could are more than likely on the side of the Islamists or simply do not care. Evil is
      spreading over the World like a thick toxic cloud and the need is going to take Divine
      intercession, miracles do happen. Looking at Israel one must believe in miracles……William

      • wctaqiyya

        WJW, that is exactly the kind of passive victim mentality I spoke of. Who will give them? Who will train them? Only the government can protect them? Deep breath. If those long suffering fools can't purchase guns in that country, where weapons proliferation is the understatement of the century, maybe they deserve to die for complete stupidity. Even the Nigerian government claims that small arms weapons and ammo grow on trees in that country. And yes WJW, evil will continue to spread, especially when nobody offers any resistance to it. BTW, Israel is not a miracle, they just understand the concept of self-defense better than your Nigerian missionary friends. Finally, weapon sellers sell weapons for money, not for political expediency.

        • WilliamJamesWard

          Sorry to hear you interpret what I am saying as if those people there are cowards and
          unwilling to stand up for themselves. The list of dead and maimed is in the thousands
          and they fight without modern weapons, in some places where there is some funding
          weapons can be bought, but my Mission is with people so poor they have absolutely
          nothing but the rags on their starving backs and the orphans so traumatized and
          maimed they may never know hope or peace. You need to understand, there is not
          here…………take a trip to Congo or Nigeria or Sudan and find out for yourself up front
          and personal and you may have a different take on the situation…………If I could I
          would hunt the murdering fiends and send them all to hell…………..William

          • wctaqiyya

            Approximately 15,000 dead since 1999. But, among others, the Archbishop of Abuja is unwilling to call it a religiously motivated civil war. It seems that leaders in Nigeria suffer the same delusions many Americans still labor under. Islam is a religion of peace and some Muslims act violently because they are poor and downtrodden and misunderstood. They have a point actually, 75% of the people in the north of the country live below the poverty line, while only 25% of the folks in the south do. I wonder how the Muslims get the money for guns since they have less? Unless maybe they have support from their richer cousins in Saudi Arabia? Yes WJW, even though you only implied it, you are correct to say that Christians in Nigeria are not getting the material support they need from their richer cousins in the U.S., Canada and elsewhere. On that note, I hope to see your missionary friends do some fund raising in the near future. At the least, maybe you and your friends can help the religious hierarchy in Nigeria see the Muslim threat for what it really is, rather than the ubiquitous isolated criminal acts of a few, they now pretend to hope it is. Finally, since this is not rocket science, a trip up the Congo or into Angola, while unpleasant, would not enhance my understanding about passivity, denial, fighting, calling a fact a fact and other simple concepts. I have a firm hand on those, thanks anyway.

          • WilliamJamesWard

            I think the people are appreciative of how dire the threat posed by Muslims is and
            will with a proper leadership take on the task of self preservation. It may be that
            we will see happen there what will happen here if we let it. Having traveled the
            World I understand that there are differences in peoples and some are much more
            agressive than others, luckily for America we have enough of the latter to make
            agressors sorry they were ever born, we just need to adjust our political thinking
            or it is America that will become history and of course over my dead body.
            William

  • PhillipGaley

    "She [Hillary] concluded by saying: “Our thoughts and prayers are with the families and loved ones of those who were killed and injured.”?

    Gosh, what a creep, . . . for, as the Apostle left for us, if to the one who is cold, or hungry, or injured, you say: "Sorry about your tough luck, but I hope you have a nice day.", how is the love of G0D in you?

    • intrcptr2

      Guess the stress from taking sniper fire in Bosnia has made her forget all that.

  • Michael

    In Nigeria, the presence and activity of a Muslim comminity has become objectively dangerous to the life and property of non-Muslims, no matter that Muslims may be in good faith and well-intentioned.

    The profession and practice of Islam in Nigeria is outside the due limits of the right to religious liberty as expounded by the Second Vatican Council.

    Pope Leo XIII taught that, the further a state is driven to tolerate evil, the further it ir from perfection. Where the case for toleration loses its foundation in considerations of public welfare, the state must repress public manifestations of false religion.

    Accordingly, it is time the Muslims of Nigeria were given a short period of time to change their religion and convert their mosques into churches. If not, the non-Muslims will do it for them, and they might shed a little blood in doing so.

  • Noah

    American government's stand that Boko Haram is not a terrorist organization does not come as a surprise. Christians in America are also passing through a season of being trampled upon. Persecution has helped Christians being persecuted by forces of evil on each continent to look up with hope. Help is surely on the way.

  • Ghostwriter

    One label Boko Haram certainly deserves are savages. Calling them terrorists isn't saying enough about those monsters.

  • WilliamJamesWard

    Obama will do nothing that impedes the imposition of Sharia Law, the deaths of innocents at the
    hands of Islamist butchers is of no concern to him, it is regular with the overlords at Muslim
    Brotherhood and he is their guy. African slaughter is in the millions yearly and who is behind it ,
    Islamists and criminal thuggery. The vaunted UN troops in Africa have been partakers in rape,
    robbery and if not partakers, witnesses to murder with smiles on their faces. Islam is a world wide
    curse and it is directing the actions of our State Department and President to do it's bidding while
    hiding behind transparent and vacuous excuses the worst of which is in ignoring the suffering and death……………………..William

  • dougjmiller

    The atrocities inflicted by Moslems on non-Moslems in Nigeria is to ethnic cleanse non-Moslems from Nigeria. Moslems are more than eager to perpetrate genocide. Radical Islamic terrorists are waging wars of aggression on many fronts around the globe. The goal of Islamic extremists is world domination and an end to all religions other than their perverted version of Islam. They will kill every man, woman and child they can get their filthy hands on in order to frighten the rest of the population into submission. In their war against civilization Islamic extremists will kill every Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, Confuscist, Jew, Atheist and non radical Moslem they can. The decent nations and the good people of the world must defeat radical Islam if we want to preserve civilization.

  • D S Dunlap

    I may be wrong, but what I think ObamaYoMama is saying is that what we are terming "terrorism" is part and parcel of the Mohammedan (I try NOT to use "Islam" or "Muslims" to describe Mohammedanism and Mohammedans) concept of jihad. Which is, in fact, war to further the spread of Mohammedanism and the "rule of Allah" over the entire world.

    I call terrorism "part and parcel" because jihad is TOTAL WAR. It involves violent actions against non-MMohammedans, usually targetting civilians (also known as terrorism); it involves actual invasion by Mohammedan armies and nation-states against non-Mohammedan armies and nation-states; it involves convincing non-Mohammedans in places where there are FEW Mohammedans to convert to Mohammedanism by promises and bribery; it involves undermining the will of non-Mohammedan societies to stand up for their own cultures, laws, and mores; it involves subsuming governmental organizations into giving Mohammedanism privileges said governmental organizations do not extend to others (like the right to have their OWN laws enforcable for them, rather than having to abide by the laws of the places in which they are inhabiting); it involves deception of said peoples into believing that the "extremists" are few and that most are "moderate," when in fact the "moderates" secretly support the "extremists" with funds, supplies, and moral support. All of these are facets of Mohammedan jihad.

    As for the U.S. Government's seeming reticence to call Boko Haram a "terrorist" organization, or to give aid to the Nigerian government in its fight against Boko Haram and other Mohammedanist groups, well, I have come to believe that it is, at best, an idiotic lack of understanding of what Mohammedanism is really about; at worst, it is aiding and abetting Mohammedanism's attempts to overtake and enslave the entire planet.

    “The Nigerian government must effectively engage communities vulnerable to extremist violence by addressing the underlying political and socio-economic problems in the North,” Mr Carson says. I say that the Nigerian Government should engage in the violent, unrelenting, thoroughgoing destruction of Boko Haram and any other group in Nigeria that wants to force Nigeria to become a Mohammedanist state. If the US government won't help the Nigerians, then perhaps the Israelis can. After all, I hear they've been assisting the animist and Christian South Sudan in the recent troubles with Arab Mohammedanist Sudan.

  • Pault

    These are the children of Ishmael, the first son of Abraham born to his handmaid, Hagar. It was prophesied of them that they would be against every man and every man's hand would be against them. Nothing can change them. They have been like this for centuries and will continue to be. Before Mohammad, they were of the same nature. Islam is simply a vehicle througth which their venom finds vent.
    One reason they now have such world noteriety is because of American and European stupidity in allowing them into their countries with the fool notion that they will assimilate and become like them. The nation that forgets God will be turned into hell – it looks like it will the hell of domination by Islam. Could Islam be God's judgment on nations that have turned their backs on Him, and have given themselves over to their own notions – full of sin and debauchery?

    • Nashr

      Couldn't have said it better!!!!

  • janet

    I LOVE ISLAM.MUSLIM ARE PEACEFUL AND GOOD.TRY LEARNING ABOUT THEM.GOO ISLAM

    • Nashr

      I am curious to know what attracts you to your religion? What attracts me to mine is LOVE. The bible teaches us to love everyone and to pray for everyone ….even our enemies…so that they may understand that God is Love and change their evil ways. I am sure these terrorists love God in their own way. They may think that they are doing what God wants. Unfortunately, they have been mislead to think that God wants all INFIDELS to die. This is a well known rule in Islam. SO be true to yourself and your relationship with God. Yes, there are many peaceful Muslims….but the truth is that Islam is not a peaceful religion. If you want to test that. …ask youself what would happen to you if you decided to start going to church or to read the bible….how would your community see that? How would they treat you? God created us all free. He doesn't even force us to love him or obey him ….does your religion teach the same?

  • Faith Irikefe

    We are not helpless. We believe in Christ Jesus who died for the sins of the world including the sins of America. Our help comes from God who can use anybody to help us in the northern part of my country Nigeria. Islam is the anti Christ, ther are other groups also. They have one goal to fight God. Nobody has succeeded at that. To be absent from the body is to be present with God. Mohamed is dead but Jesus Christ rose from the dead . How can we that believes fear?

  • johnnywoods

    JESUS said, "a strong man armed keepeth his house".

  • intrcptr2

    My kneejerk is to simply tell you that you're wrong (Because you are).

    But I think I'd rather ask you to provide chapter and verse…