Muslim ‘Offenses’ Are About Power, Not Words

Pages: 1 2

The historian Nils Rune Langeland, a Professor at the University of Stavanger in Norway, dared to make some statements about possible future conflicts caused by Multiculturalism and mass immigration that the establishment, self-appointed guardians of Goodness, did not like. Frithjof Jacobsen, formerly the vocalist in a hard rock band and currently the leader of newspaper VG’s regular columnists, toyed in a column with the idea that maybe the security services should quietly search the flat of Mr. Langeland. He even suggested that the good Professor perhaps deserved to be “tarred and feathered” for his views.

This full-length essay was published in the country’s arguably most powerful newspaper and was illustrated by a drawing made by respected illustrator Roar Hagen, showing the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) spying on a brain filled with ideas about an Islamic threat to Europe and the Western world. Columnist Jacobsen furthermore wrote that Anders Behring Breivik’s mass murder was simply the “natural product” of mudslingers on the Internet who tirelessly keep repeating the same otherworldly tales about a supposed Islamic threat to our societies. In his opinion, using Breivik’s atrocities to confront people harboring such opinions is “completely natural,” since their criticism of Islamic aggression and terrorism means that they “share opinions with terrorists and murderers.”

Frithjof Jacobsen suggested that one of these dangerous and extremist ideas that should be confronted and possibly lead to closer personal surveillance by the country’s security services is the use of the term “dhimmi.” Yet this is a perfectly acceptable Arabic word that has been part and parcel of Islamic vocabulary and mentality for over a thousand years. Mr. Jacobsen thus first and foremost betrayed his own profound ignorance and mistook this for tolerance, which is a fairly common flaw for his kind of people.

Dhimmis are non-Muslims under Islamic rule who are not just second-rate citizens in their own country but could almost be described as non-citizens, lacking basic rights and protection for themselves and their families in many situations. Dhimmis are supposed to be subservient and obedient to Muslims at all times and are required to forever pay them substantial amounts of protection money, jizya, in “willing submission” to Islamic rule.

Muslims love to portray themselves as innocent, blameless victims and predictably complain after nearly every Jihadist terror attack that all Muslims should not be punished for the actions of a few individuals. However, they carefully leave out the fact that this is precisely what their own Islamic law and logic dictates for non-Muslims.

If even one non-Muslim dhimmi says or does something that displeases a Muslim, this can and sometimes does trigger violent retribution against his entire community. In practice, a mere rumor falsely planted by a Muslim who holds a personal grudge against a specific non-Muslim can be enough to trigger riots, murder and mayhem. This means that non-Muslims in countries harboring sizable Muslim populations live under a constant shadow of fear of Muslim violence and abuse. If one of them at any given time says something critical of Islam or its founder, this can trigger violent attacks and murder against his entire clan, tribe or nation based on the flimsiest excuse.

What Western mass media have nearly universally failed to point out is that Muslims have now advanced to the point where they treat the entire Western world as dhimmis, hostages to Muslim abuse and threats of violence. On September 11th 2012, the anniversary of the 9/11 Jihadist attacks against the USA, Muslim mobs attacked several American embassies in the Middle East and killed the US Ambassador in Libya, Christopher Stevens. Evidence indicates that this attack had been planned in advance.

In multiple Middle Eastern cities, crowds shouted slogans in praise of Osama bin Laden, whose terror network al-Qaida killed thousands of Americans on September 11th 2001. The date was no doubt chosen to mock the USA and show continued support for Jihad against the West, yet the pretext for these attacks was an obscure movie made under unclear circumstances in the USA that was considered offensive to Muslims. Western media who present this movie, Innocence of Muslims, as the “cause” or direct trigger of these attacks fail to note that Muslims will pick up any pretext to riot. They have been known to make complaints and threats to hamburger stores or coffee shops because they claimed to have seen hidden references to the words Allah or Muhammed in their products. Muslims are skinless people in a sandpaper world, as one observer once put it. Their feelings would always be “hurt” by something even if we removed all offensive cartoons and movies on the planet. This is about power, fear, dominance and Islamic aggression.

Pages: 1 2

  • Anthony

    This is a well reasoned, articulate response to the reality of western media complicancy in the Islsmification of Norway, et, al.

    I’ve been thinking lately that like the Borg in Star Trek, resistance is futile against global Islam. When one considers the degree of brainwashing, evil indoctrination, political back stabbing and collusion with subversive forces that empower Islam in our western nations, it appears an orchestrated effort to wreck the West is afoot. So how does one fight against such nefarious forces of evlil whose votaries appear more than willing to marry off their 9 year old daughter to Moslem men in the near future?

    I don’t know. A campaign of information awareness cannot work as the brainwashed liberals are Gestapo like overseers of the information highway. Peaceful protests as has been seen with the EDL and SIOE have garnered a heavy handed treatment by authorities. Public option on the surface seems to desire Halal food and burkas and ritual Ramadan slaughter in the open streets. So what can be done?

    The only option is rebellion against the empty suits in Brussels and Oslo and Berlin and Paris and London. But even if millions took to the streets and sought new government representation , the EU superstate would likely take military action against its own citizens seeking to break the shackles of dhimmitude. If the evil EU failed in this regard, the United Stated might take action by equating resistance to the massive power of Islam to he allies storming the beaches of Hitler’s Festung Europa to free hateful minorities from “Hatred”.

    Yes, the puppet masters orchestrating the slavery of the once noble and dignified people of he West latched onto an army of darkness that at his point in time seems unstoppable. But what can be done against this terrible tragedy and why are the elites inboard with the traitorous enslavement of their own children, families, friends, faith , traditions and culture?


    • JoJoJams

      Because the wh0re of babylon is riding the ten-headed beast, thinking she can control it, never understanding that the beast will turn on her and destroy her – and the rest of civilization, too. And, because of our unbelief, mass delusion will be allowed in the world, "so that they shall believe a great lie".
      Interesting how some stuff written a few thousand years ago actually applies to today, and is coming to fruition right in front of our own eyes.

    • Cynic

      But even if millions took to the streets and sought new government representation , the EU superstate would likely take military action against its own citizens seeking to break the shackles of dhimmitude.

      Do you think the citizens would have the courage to stand firm against military action and would the European Union behave like Assad’s regime in Syria?
      If the people are really that concerned they will have to take to the streets before the Muslim population becomes so big and aligns itself with the Brussels, because to break free from that would need a civil war of Europe.

    • Drakken

      Europe as a whole is on the brink of civil war, all it is going to take is one egregious incident to push the whole thing over. Brievek was just the beginning, what are the govts going to do when they have 1,000's of folks like him? When the media are afraid of us as they are afraid of the muslims, things will start to change.

      • Kufar Dawg

        Personally, a military overthrow of the corrupt buffoons who run Europe/Eurabia might be a better option, that is before they are also subverted and infiltrated by islamofascism, maybe something like what happened in the USSR.

  • Asher

    These people in the muslim world have proved they can’t get along with other peoples. They run on dictatorships and oppression. The film that was supposed to have caused the deaths of Christopher Stevens and 3 other Americans was just an excuse for Jihad….They will use any trick in the book!

  • MikeWood

    The responses of the elite and mass media are extremely confused and in some respects understandable (though, I would dearly love to see them grow a backbone). The threat, the sense of growing menace, is so great that they resort to that most primitive of mental defences: denial. They don't look at the evidence and weigh things in the balance of reason, they just block it out and ridicule and demonise those who do face the threat. We are witnessing the hyper-effectiveness of the Muslim use of terror. Take terror to extremes, even for the tiniest things; make it indiscriminate so that any kaffir will pay the highest price for the "misbehaviour" of any other kaffir. This ensures that all kaffirs are heavily invested in preventing any one of them causing offence to Muslims or rebelling against Sharia. This response is leading to the suppression of opposition to dhimmitude and jihad. I can imagine non-Muslim community leaders in Muslim states behaving in a very similar way – throughout history.

  • BLJ

    Islam sucks. Is that good enough?

  • Advocatus

    The funny thing about Islam is that the more you learn about its tenets, the more you end up despising it — unless, of course, you are a lamentably chauvinistic and insufferably self-righteous soul who finds a benighted creed of supernatural nonsense, inherent misogyny, intellectual obscurantism and religious supremacism to be highly appealing. Yet quote the Koran chapter and verse, point out obvious facts about Muslim societies, cite well-attested Islamic acts of aggression, oppression and violence from throughout the religion's long and bloody history, and you'll be instantly branded an "ignorant" bigot and a hateful (Islamophobe), whatever that term is supposed to mean. Like I said: funny, that.

    • Kufar Dawg

      I've had the same experience from pig ignorant idiots, some of whom I used to call friend.

  • Tim

    This aggressive encroachment on the West by Islam puts the actions of Charles Martel, the Crusaders, and the Spanish Reconquista in a whole new light, doesn't it? They managed to evict Islam from large swaths of the West in their time and enabled the West to flourish.

    • 1389AD


    • Drakken

      As history as my guide, those days are going to come back with a vengeance and when they do, the leftist will know what true fear is, for they are allies of the very muslims who wish to take us back to the dark ages.

  • Ricky Michael

    Moderate Muslims are a myth. Most have merely not decided yet to be fervent in their beliefs yet.

    This is a religion that thrives on the "Mob" mentality. All it takes is one very minor issue, and poof, you get roits in the streets, along with various sundries like beheadings and hanging bodies from bridges. Call it for what it is, a terroristic, you will convert or else, abusive doctrine.

    • 1389AD


      And sometimes these "very minor issues" or sometimes not-so-minor issues are manufactured by the Muslims themselves. (Pallywood and the Mohammad al-Dura hoax).

  • @OceanGram

    Dear powers of the invisible. Please help us from this
    Religion that is a front for power politics an evil

    If we could abduct all the women the mean
    Angry men would devour each other

  • Schlomotion

    What Peder Jensen leaves out of his article here is that he is almost the sole provider of Anders Breivik's self-justification. Jacobsen sounds like the rational one for saying "Anders Behring Breivik’s mass murder was simply the 'natural product' of mudslingers on the Internet who tirelessly keep repeating the same otherworldly tales about a supposed Islamic threat to our societies." Those mudslingers mostly narrow down to Peder Jensen.

    Jensen really does transpose a sixth century minority paranoia into western civilizations that have a Muslim minority. Citing 9/11 as an example of global "dhimmitude" to the 22% of the world who believe in Islam is definitely delusional paranoia.

    • Hidden Author

      In other words, it is not important to refute any facts Fjordman might bring up. Instead you have to say (and repeat) Fjordman is Paranoid! Racist! Paranoid! Racist! … etc.

      • Schlomotion

        That works well, especially since it is true. But more importantly, Fjordman is the "brains" behind Breivik. Breivik is merely the brawn and the crazy willingness to put words into action. There were lots of facts in Mein Kampf. Pol Pot was in possession of all sorts of facts. That doesn't mean he was worth having tea, biscuits, and a forum with.

        • Georgina

          Breivik got lots of ideas from people like JFK and the Koran. The idea of visiting retribution to anyone within the group you despise is inherently islamic.
          Killing all those socialists for the sins of their parents was almost biblical!

          Much as Germany's legal system is still harping on about 10 'new-Germans' killed by 3 racists over a decade, while ignoring the hundreds of women, children and old men who have been beaten, robbed, raped, killed and mutilated by adherents of the Mohammedan ideology – or the thousands of muslims who riot and destroy whenever a muslim is arrested – you ignore the amount of anger which can be channeled within a "one is guilty – all are guilty" mentality.

          This mentality is what caused Breivik to do what he did, and it is what fuels the islamic fires.

        • Drakken

          Continue to side with the very savages who imperil us all makes you a traitor, period. Nothing you say refutes the very facts that you deny. You and folks who act and think as you do are in for the rudest of awakings. At this point, I am fresh out of sympathy or empathy for you and your kind because your actions in words and deeds will be met with western civilizations greatest strengths, it's ability to self correct by warfare.

          • Kufar Dawg

            I'd propose that Scholomotion is one of the them. His defense of islamofascism is very subtle, but his bias is clear enough — especially WRT Judaism and Jews.

    • UCSPanther

      Brevik is no longer relevant, and as usual, you are shooting your mouth off.

    • Billy Hill

      Mister Breivik formed his opinion of Islam years before he ever heard of "Fjordman" . Mister Breivik is responsible for his own acts. Your kind of logic would dictate that Dr. King and Malcolm X are responsible for the deaths of the civil rights workers in Mississippi.

    • KathleenP

      FYI, Schlomotion is a Jew-hating troll; like all trolls feeding it just makes it come back for more.

  • Ghostwriter

    Earlier,someone compared Islamists to the Borg. That's accurate,but a case could be made that they're also like the Daleks from the "Doctor Who" series. To those who don't know,they're a race of aliens who look like R2-D2's bigger,nastier brothers. They also hate everyone and everything that IS NOT like them. That also sounds like the Islamists as well.

  • Sunbeam

    Wherever they go, their intention was to plant their hateful ideology there. They never seek to belong in the land that they adopted, but seek to supersede its way life.

  • 1389AD
  • 1389AD
  • Drakken

    What I find interesting is that the more govts and media try to suppress and prosecute people who openly question the status quo, the more likely that people will respond to it by resistance by any and all means. There will be civil war and the people that brought us to this point will have to pay the fiddler for dancing to his tune.

    • Kufar Dawg

      I'm beginning to think what you propose is the best possible outcome, because the only alternative I see is a submission to islamofascism, whether willing or not.