Muslims Stone Christians in America, Part III — on The Glazov Gang


On this week’s Glazov Gang, Tom Trento, Dwight Schultz and Josh Brewster gathered to discuss Muslims Stone Christians in Dearborn, Michigan. Below is Part III of a three part series. To watch Part I, click here. To watch Part II, click here.

You can make sure that Jamie Glazov Productions continues to take you where no other media programs dare to go. Help us by clicking here and making a tax deductible contribution today.

  • http://twitter.com/pfogel @pfogel

    Kudos for this week's shows. This truly is the "dream team" and if you will the "A Team". :) Dwight Shultz is brilliant and I for one would like to see him in every segment.

    Throwing stones at Christians is something that will become the norm with the muslims across the United States. It'll be a new form of jihad and you can say 'coming soon to an area near you'. Let me remind you how many times muslim groups marched and were yelling "Jews to the gas chambers". In a way that's even worse then stone throwing but part and parcel of the mindset of the muslims.

    I no longer believe in moderate muslims cos the problem is islam and the majority of muslims follow the koran. In order for there to be moderates they have to boldly speak against the jihad and terror. They have to speak against the stone throwing etc. None have done it yet and I doubt any will.

    Educating the American people of the inherent dangers of islam is of paramount importance and as usual the MSM is doing the exact opposite so it's up to us and compliments to you for the Glazov gang that does just that. Front Page magazine and other sites are of the utmost importance in bringing all the manifestations of islam to the awareness of the American people.

    .

  • voted against carter

    Having lived in Dearborn BEFORE it became derborn-a-stain, this does NOT surprise me.

    This IS what the PEDOPHILE DEATH CULT known as Islam has planed for ALL of America.

    WAKE up America,…

    The PEDOPHILE DEATH CULT known as Islam IS coming to YOUR town SOONER than you think.

    • jtbaumgart

      I am sure that will be a comfort to you when the Muslims are carving you up like a Ramadam Ham.

      • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

        No, but you seem to have all the hate and bigotry of a typical muslim cleric at your beck and call.

    • Ghostwriter

      Nice,Mr. Russel. Bash Christians. When you can't respond to something,you attack Christians. You're such an unbelievable idiot that not even the Flying Spaghetti Monster will want to help you.

      • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

        He's not Mr. Roger, he's just using my name to irritate.

        Evidently the moderators don't think impersonation is a bad thing.

      • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

        You are a hate filled bigot.
        How are the little goats coming along? Did you find enough toys to keep you happy again?

        • Roger Russel

          More slander <DIV style=”FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt”> <DIV style=”FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt”> <DIV dir=ltr> <DIV style=”BORDER-BOTTOM: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; LINE-HEIGHT: 0; MARGIN: 5px 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; HEIGHT: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 0px; BORDER-TOP: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-RIGHT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 0px”></DIV>

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            No, it's not. Only a hate filled bigot would say this and declare jihad on people he had never even met.

            24 minutes ago @ Breitbart.tv – Soldier Found Guilty i… · 1 reply · +1 points
            "The whole town needs locked in the church and the church set on fire. IMO"

  • RoguePatriot6

    Care to proove it? Care to proove it by scripture IN CONTEXT? Yea, that's the key isn't it? Scriptures according to what they actually intend to get accross to you. Prove that Christ actually commanded His diciples or followers to rape, burn, pillage and conquer countries by the sword force them to convert.

    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

      Wee, you have tried that one hundreds of times. The law of God was written in stone by the finger of God.
      That law still stands, so murder, lying, and the other things cherished by islam are still wrong.

      But you haven't proven that Jesus advocates any of those things. The very things you say are bad about religion are the things Jesus never taught. And we have shown by historical records Jesus did exist and did live. You simply don't want to admit it.

      Do you have any eye witnesses for evolution? See how that works? You lose every time you try it.

      • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

        No, you don't see it every day.

        In fact, that's a reason not to believe in evolution. It's all biased heresay.

        • Roger Russel

          Well you don't Monkey. You are lockedin your cage all day <DIV style=”FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt”> <DIV style=”FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt”> <DIV dir=ltr> <DIV style=”BORDER-BOTTOM: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; LINE-HEIGHT: 0; MARGIN: 5px 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; HEIGHT: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 0px; BORDER-TOP: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-RIGHT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 0px”></DIV>

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            You're the one at your work terminal. Forced to use machinery and technology so far above you, so much out of your league you can't even figure out how to stop the headers.

            Hahahaha…..

            Wee, you small little tiny man.

          • Looking4Sanity

            The funniest part of this is you posted it after he clocked out! He'll come in in the morning, see that this has been up all afternoon and night…and plotz!

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            Me? Do that?

            I just…. hmmm…. can't imagine…. you think I'd do that on purpose?

          • Looking4Sanity

            I know I do. And the best part is he can't rightfully resent us doing it. It provides him with unlimited job security. Every morning when he clocks in he's got his work cut out for him. I'm just afraid he isn't up to the task!

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            And every morning I'm right there to greet him and start in on the mockery and the ridicule any closet muslim troll deserves.

            He needs a video to help him relieve some stress. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG2d-yZKfgE

          • Looking4Sanity

            That is frickin hilarious! He won't be able to stand up until lunch!

  • RoguePatriot6

    Ooohhh….you must be "Jesusinator" with a new name. So, I know whatever explanation I give probably won't matter to someone who just DECIDES that whatever chip they have on their shoulder about Christ or his teachngs is far too important than what was actually said by Him.

    Yes, I have read the Old Testament a few times. It's good thing that Jesus was born and died for all of our sins and now we are no longer doing burnt offerings, having to worship in a tabernacle, can eat what ever we want, don't have to go through the ordeal of stoning anyone. Now, that's really cool. We can pray for them (goes a long ways) and try to talk some sense into them out of love and compassion.

    Is the earth still here? Yes it is and what would that have to do with anythng. Let me guess…uhh…..Matthew 24:35, right? If you bothered to read it in it's entirity He was speaking in the sense that all things will eventually pass away but His words and their meaning will remain the true authority.

    Can you prove Jesus ever existed? Why don't you prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that He didn't?

    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

      That's not true, and it's not true each of the dozens of times you make the claim.

      The gospels were written before the destruction of Jerusalem in 70ad.

      John claims he was there, he was a disciple and saw and heard things. John 21-24 doesn't say what you claim. 1 John 1:1 explains this. Matthew was a disciple and who cares if he wrote in third person as a narative, that's what he was telling. h

      You're just a muslim friendly bigot who attacks Christianity.

      • Roger Russel

        Of course it's true, only a liar would say otherwise Monkey. Fundamentalists justify their religious beliefs with extraordinarily poor evidence and arguments <DIV style=”FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt”> <DIV style=”FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt”> <DIV dir=ltr> <DIV style=”BORDER-BOTTOM: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; LINE-HEIGHT: 0; MARGIN: 5px 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; HEIGHT: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 0px; BORDER-TOP: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-RIGHT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 0px”></DIV>

        • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

          They were written by witnesses, admitted they were witnesses and wrote before 70AD and the destruction of Jerusalem.

          That's logic that you can't dance around. So, you'll find some lies and use them. But you're still stuck at your work terminal with that flask of mtn dew. You probably don't 'need it' but just use it to keep your nerves steady.

          There are meetings that can help you with that.

    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

      Jesus was an itinerant local, not even a Roman citizen. Why would the Romans care?

      But the Roman who judged him (Pilate) was later Governor of Egypt and was a convert. He's still a patron saint of the coptic church since he helped found it. That's all recorded.

      • Roger Russel

        Historically speaking the absolute lack of evidence for a figure of the said time period means one of two things; the figure was very insignificant or did not exist. As it stands there is absolutely no historical evidence for the figure Jesus of Nazareth, son of Joseph, thus there is no reason to suggest he ever existed. There occurs no contemporary Roman record that shows Pontius Pilate executing a man named Jesus <DIV style=”FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt”> <DIV style=”FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt”> <DIV dir=ltr> <DIV style=”BORDER-BOTTOM: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; LINE-HEIGHT: 0; MARGIN: 5px 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; HEIGHT: 0px; FONT-SIZE: 0px; BORDER-TOP: #ccc 1px solid; BORDER-RIGHT: #ccc 1px solid; PADDING-TOP: 0px”></DIV>

        • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

          There isn't a lack of evidence. You simply reject it because you reject the one all the evidence points too.

  • FPF

    Soft jihad will defame freedom fighters and will destroy the US from within, starting with the government from top down. Hard jihad will use IEDs and guns if they get hold of them. Throwing stone is just a small case.

  • jm323

    Are people signed in with IntenseDebate allowed to post comments here? Why doesn't the "Submit Comment" button work when I had something more pertinent to post? Why is there a big f____, stupid ad plastered over the guidelines thta we can't remove even if we click the stupid ad? Is there a word limit to comment posts? what is the word limit? Sheesh!

    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

      Sounds like the western world confuses you.

  • jm323

    It is sad to see Jamie Glazov still using this phony "Muslims stoning Christians in America" stuff to draw people to important discussions like this one about the Obama administration's support for the Islamist takeover of the Middle East. (Indeed this video posting is not even about the Dearborn event.) His use of this meme will only serve to undercut his and David Horowitz's credibility.

    A local Arab American Chamber of Commerce obtained a permit to use a space for three days to stage an Arab American festival (not a Muslim festival; afterall there are still Christian Arabs in Dearborn today). A group of Christian fanatics invaded the festival space with the obvious objective of provoking a reaction (which turned out to be the throwing of trash and plastic bottles at them). Go to Youtube and find "Arab International Festival" posted by 'azzahmed1'; and then look at the right side of that page to find another hour-long video posted by an insider of this Christian group ('buddyfisher1', a member of "Bible Believers?") and watch that.

    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

      It backs his credibility.
      And Obama is working hard for that islamist takeover.

  • jm323

    (Continued….) The relevant issue here is NOT the incendiary nature of these fanatics' speech and gestures (pigs heads, "You little s–ts are all going to hell!", and things like that), but rather that someone had the right to use that venue for their own event; and that right was violated by this other group. If the police had not failed to do their job and arrested this other group on the charge of disturbing the peace or disorderly conduct, the riotious behavior by the other side would have never happened.

    Free speech entails the concept of property rights: the right of the speaker to use a venue (on agreed terms) to exercise his right of speech and assembly. These Christians' claims that their free speech rights were violated by "the Muslims" are obviously bogus.

    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

      The right to free speech is the right to offend.
      If the only free speech that was allowed was the words that would never offend anyone, then it wouldn't be free speech.

      • jm323

        You see, everyone? Roger, here, agrees with me!

        (But I am a little confused about Roger's actual position because he replies to my other comment above this one by saying that Glazov's endorsement of this Christian group's legal claims HELPS Glazov's own credibility. ……….Hmmmmm….)

        • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

          The way you ramble about venues, it's hard to tell what position you are taking.

          Venue doesn't matter. If I want to eat a pork sandwich and drink a beer outside a mosque they have no right to tell me I can't.

          • jm323

            Free speech without the concept of property right is meaningless. Leftist protestors who disrupt David Horowitz when he gives speeches on university campuses are in the wrong because the are violating the rights of those who obtained a permit to use that particular venue.

            These "Bible Believers" were in the wrong because an Arab American group had obtained a permit to use that space for their activities for three days time. If this Christian group had merely brought pork sandwiches and a beer to consume, there wouldn't have been a problem. Even the signs and the pig's head could (arguably, as a point of law) be ignored by the festival goers; but, as soon as the Bible Believers turned on the loudspeaker system and began shouting through it, then that is clearly disrupting the event. Free speech does not include the right to disrupt other people's events.

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            The story here is about a stoning, on public streets.
            Colleges are public property, funded by public funding. Inside the classroom is different, but if the protesters were outside in a place with no expectation of privacy they would be well within their grounds to protest.

            And these Christians did just bring a pork sandwich, they were on a public street and the pig head set off the violence. You are just blathering. Free speech means just that, even if it means offending muslims in dearborn.

  • jm323

    (continued…) David Horowitz often goes onto university campuses to give speeches, which are often targets of intentional disruption by leftists. It doesn't matter if the university (or its auditoriums) are "public property" or "public spaces". The group that hosts the speaker has acquired the right (by permit) to use the venue to exercise its free speech & assembly rights. Anyone else who walks in with a megaphone and starts screeming anything is violating the other group's rights.

    I hope someone who personally knows either David Horowitz or Jamie Glazov will get in touch with them and get Mr. Glazov to jetison this stupid "Muslims are stoning Christians in Dearborn" meme; because it is only going to undermine the credibility of Glazov, Horowitz, and FrontPageMag. (Or …are they now going to adopt the long-time leftist tactic of the "noble lie" to advance worthy causes –causes like fighting the real threat of Jihad?)