Obama’s Foreign Policy Incompetence

Pages: 1 2

Editor’s note: The following talk by Congressman Ed Royce (R-CA) was delivered at the David Horowitz Freedom Center’s 2012 West Coast Retreat, held March 30th-April 1st at the Terranea Resort in Palos Verdes, California. Video of congressman’s speech can also be seen below.

Congressman Ed Royce:  Thank you very much.  Michael and I were just talking about the fact that yes, yes we did run Barney Frank out.  That is true.  But he said, “Well, who’s in line to be chairman if the Democrats take the House in Financial Services?”  Well, Maxine Waters has been given the nod.  So, you know, one step forward, two back.

I did want to share with you a few thoughts this morning, just about some of the ways in which the President has been working to fundamentally transform America with respect to his policies on debt, with respect to the policies as it relates to energy, as it relates to foreign policy.  And I think I’ll just start with the healthcare bill because a few of you noticed the estimate that just came out of the Congressional Budget Office that the President’s original estimates of $900 billion cost over the next 10 years was a little shy.  It’s actually going to be double that.  Now, that’s the bad news for President Obama.  The good news, I guess, is that we’re now 30th in math, so nobody will notice the fact that we now have doubled the cost of a new entitlement, a new entitlement.

And this is what I think is most stunning to me, because as one of the deficit hawks who used to go to the floor and press the President and, yes, Karl Rove, on the $161 billion deficit that we had reached, wow, those were the good old days.  Because within one year, one year later with all the stimulus spending, President Obama had that at tenfold, the worst deficit that we had seen.  We were at $161 billion; all of a sudden we go to $1.6 trillion.

And guess what?  The President has no plan to ratchet this back down.  Every year we’re at $1.5 trillion in new deficit spending under this president for as far as the eye can see.  And the consequences of this is the $5 trillion addition to the debt under this administration.  And not one — when you look at it, I mean, we’ve gone through four St. Patrick’s Days now and we haven’t had one green job, one net green job created here.  The unemployment rate is the same as it was four years ago, but the number of people out of work, the number of people in the workforce is dramatically higher.

And the other concept here is the fact that as you’ve got young people graduating from high school or college into the workforce, you’ve got to grow that economy at 2%.  So if you have more people out of work that have left the labor force than four years ago, where are you going with this economic plan?

And what is this plan?  With respect to energy, what is the vision here?  And I want to just speak to an issue that I’ve held a number of hearings on and that is our energy policy, which seems to be to drive up the price of gas.  I think it was $1.83 a gallon when the President came into office and now it’s $4 a gallon.  Drive up the price by driving down the amount that can be produced on public lands.  Occasionally you’ll hear, well, there’s some more gas production that’s going on on private lands.  Yes, that’s the production they haven’t figured out a way to stop yet.

And still the number of permits that are actually given out are a fraction of what they were historically.  And at the same time you have on these major projects — and let’s just look at one of them, the attempt by Canada to create a market for its reserves out of Alberta, which are the third largest in the world.  And so you have a situation with the Keystone Pipeline where there was an attempt to use gravity and connect that pipeline up with our refineries here in the United States.

Now, as you know, the Canadian Prime Minister, Harper, after the President turned down this proposal, has met with Hu Jintao, the head of state for China, and they have now discussed China, which already has vast energy holdings, by the way, in British Columbia.  China has been preparing for this day.  And just as across Africa and across Latin America they have been able to make these major investments, now they’re in British Columbia.  And the requirement that the Canadians have in order to find a source for their oil now that it has been blocked will produce a pipeline, but it will go west instead of south.

We had an opportunity to be less reliant on Middle Eastern oil.  We had an opportunity to buy our oil from our ally instead of our adversaries and to send those dollars north to an ally in which 85% of the money, according to economists, would be regenerated back into our economy.  But we decided rather than to do that, we would take an alternative option, foreclose that pipeline, and create a circumstance where, instead of today where oil prices, energy prices are 20% higher in Asia than in the United States — our economic competitors pay 20% higher for their energy costs with respect to their manufacturing than we do.  And we are now going to inverse that relationship.  We are going to do what we can do to make certain that China has possession for the next 30 years of what comes out of Alberta and so that its energy costs for production and its competition against the United States can now be lower than ours.

This is really astounding, that the President in the face of opposition from labor, in the face of opposition from the Chamber, who estimates that it’s a quarter million jobs — the President will te- — well, it’s only 20,000 direct jobs in terms of the pipe manufacture.  Right, but what about the Caterpillar tractors and all the rest of it?  What about the indirect impact of this kind of activity?  And what about what it would mean in terms of generating or rebooting the economy if you were to further bring down the cost of energy long term in the United States?

Well, you’ve got to hand it to this administration.  I mean, they are committed to fundamentally transforming this economy and they have their vision in terms of what they’re going to do in terms of higher energy prices.  They’ve said they want to double it.  They have indicated they want to go the route that Europe is on in this.  But, you know, our labor costs are higher here.  The way we always competed economically was that our energy costs were lower.  And we are now giving that up.

And I also had some observations just in terms of the Administration’s policies with respect to foreign policy.  Michael Oren, Israel’s ambassador to the United States, and a great author, by the way, was in my office a few weeks ago.  And we reviewed the map surrounding Israel.

And of course on one border you’ve got an imploding Syria.  On another border you have Lebanon rearming, rearming with Hezbollah basically now getting an inventory of longer-range missiles than the ones that I saw in 2006.  I went there during the Hezbollah war.  And at that time I watched that port in Haifa that was closed for almost 30 days.  Now, that’s the artery in which, you know, Israel’s survival is dependent upon that.  I watched that come in under attack every day, every day, from those missiles.  This is the kind of environment that we see there.

We see Fatah and Hamas come up with this unity pact.  Now I remember when we pressed the Administration on this what was — about making the statements that would make it clear that we would not countenance such an arrangement.  But instead of bold statements, instead of the statement that the United States would not support a terrorist government, we just heard talk out of the Administration.  And finally, when it’s done, when it’s a done deal, the spokesman from the State Department says it’s an internal matter for the Palestinians.

Egypt used to be Israel’s stable neighbor and now the Muslim Brotherhood and the Salafists are the dominant parties.  The cops are fleeing.  We didn’t use the influence that we had between our Pentagon and the military in Egypt to force the kind of constitution and changes that moderate forces were demanding.  And so now they’re not in a position to influence the outcomes.

And the Sinai’s the Wild West.  And Israel is, understandably, rushing to build a fence there now.

And these are just the threats on Israel’s immediate borders.  These are just — this is just small potatoes compared to the big threat.  Because you and I know, I mean, Iran might be struggling under sanctions, but the Iranian enrichment continues day after day.  And the IAEA now gives us the results every month in terms of the ability to build and deliver a nuclear weapon.  So this is the time more than ever when Israel needs friends.

And so I thought I would just look at some of the statements coming out of the Administration in terms of this fundamental transformation of our foreign policy.  You’ve got the Defense Secretary, Leon Panetta, saying, asking this question to reporters — “Is it enough to maintain a military edge?”  He’s speaking of Israel.   “Is it enough if you’re isolating yourself in a diplomatic arena?”

Then we’ve got the President’s stern lecture to Israeli leaders in front of the United Nations, and in Egypt, and in Turkey.

And then, speaking again of Mr. Panetta’s remarks, well, he’s got backup for those remarks.  President Erdogan of Turkey said, “Oh,” he said, “Mr. Panetta’s correct in his assumptions.”

Mr. Obama had that meeting with the President of France, with Nicholas Sarkozy.  And we heard about the exchange.  The President of France says, “I can’t stand Netanyahu.”  Now, this is an opportunity — well, you could respond if you’re the President of the United States, “We’ve got to understand all of the pressure that he’s un-…”  I mean, there are ways to diplomatically respond to a comment like that, other than this quote from the President, where rather than defend Israel’s back, rather than counter, he says, “You’re tired of him?  What about me?  I have to deal with him every day.”  Those are the words of the President when he didn’t know the microphone was on.  That’s not the first time, by the way.

So they asked the President of the United States and he says, “Oh, Prime Minister Erdogan of Turkey is one of the five world leaders with whom I’ve developed a bond of trust.”  This is not said before, it is said after that flotilla is sent with six ships from Turkey in order to try to bust the arms embargo off the coast of Gaza.  All right?

And then last month you had the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, she was asked about Mr. Obama pandering to Zionist lobbies, was the question.  And she acknowledges that that’s a fair question, “a fair question,” in her words.  And then says that during an election season, again in her words, “There are comments made that certainly don’t reflect our foreign policy.”

Pages: 1 2

  • Phillip Ley

    It's my contention that we have reached a critical mass within the electorate that actually may want what Obama seeks. Maybe they don't amount to half, maybe a lot of them are simply voting to maintain their benefit stream, certainly a substantial portion of them are functionally illiterate, products of an educational system dominated by Leftists, This tide may not be turnable. I am not suggesting to give up the fight. On the contrary, we have to be smarter, more aggressive, and more willing to push the envelope, The Progressives never hesitate to attack and to vilify conservatives if they do so. We have to ignore their indignation if we go on the offensive. Granted, the media is helping them to blunt the conservative message, and the idea to use the internet to counter that is already happening. God help us if it does not happen fast enough.

  • Dispozadaburka

    See "Free Speech/Protesting is Now a Felony Punishable By Jail" Fox News
    Bill signed by Obama HR347 in secret last week.
    ". Law the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011
    This law permits Secret Service agents to designate any place they wish as a place where free speech, association and petition of the government are prohibited. And it permits the Secret Service to make these determinations based on the content of speech."
    Geert Wilder will love that one!

  • Steve Chavez

    Obama does have foreign policy experience. In the 80's he was a Soviet KGB dupe and apologist for every Soviet initiative. He was not alone. Leon Panetta was also in a CPUSA FRONT. Hillary and many Democrats in Congress aided in the Soviet takeover of Central America! Our CPUSA recruited students from every university and NOW THOSE SOVIET KGB/CPUSA DUPES RUN THE WHITE HOUSE, STATE DEPARTMENT, CIA, DEFENSE, AND ARE IN HIGH RANKING POSITIONS IN EVERY DEPARTMENT.

    JUST FOR FUN, GOOGLE "OBAMA'S CZARS" and read their bios and you will see their SOVIET FOREIGN POLICY EXPERIENCE that they learned in the 80's while they were in college!

    "WHEN THE WALL FELL, WE CHEERED, THEY CRIED. WHEN THE TWINS FELL, WE CRIED, THEY CHEERED." Who are "they?" OUR AMERICANS WHO LOVED THE SOVIET UNION MORE THAN THEIR OWN COUNTRY!

    WHEN OBAMA WON THE PRESIDENCY, KGB Putin and all the die-hard Communists said, "Ha! We won the Cold War after all! Our dupe is President of the United States and our other dupes are in Cabinet positions! HAHAHAHA!"

    • cali59

      You are exactly right; Hillary has the same mindset;she'screating trouble around the world. Has anyone ever found out why obama was arrested because of his passport, upon arriving in Russia in 2007, accompanied by his protege Lugar?
      Yes, they are all Communist, incl pelosi, reid etc…
      We are in a heep of trouble, while the public is asleep and, busy watching basketball, reality shows etc..we are being sold piece by piece.

  • babyanng

    Age ain't nothing but a number for these loved-up A-Listers. My BF and I both think so! He is almost 10 years older than I. We met via ~~Agelessmeet . COM~~ a nice place for younger women and older men, or older women and younger men, to interact with each other! Maybe you wanna check it out or tell your friends: )

  • AgentRose

    THERE IS NO INCOMPETENCE!!! And we should all stop using that language. This is all deliberate. Obama is anti-American. Keep repeating that and see if it fits the explanation for everything he has and is doing with foreign policy—from open mikes to Egypt and Syria. The Communists have never been able to win except through violence. How clever to just hypnotize Americans over several decades and infiltrate Congress, higher education and the media. Don't know if the addiction to lies can wear off over the next six months to save this country.

    • mrbean

      Don't let Hillary Clinton off, she was the one who is one the first to be pushing the Egyptian, Libyan, and Syrian regime changes and it looks like we will eventually have three new Islamic theocracies run under Sharia law by the Musmlim Brotherhood. She is also the one who started the Palestinians must have a state of their own with terrorist baby killer Yassar Arafat. The Palestinians in their own words and by their actions for decades are openly committed to the genocide of the Jewish people and the destruction of Israel, therefore, have foreited their rights to even exist at all let alone be given their own UN and US sanctioned terrorist state. The woman fails at whatever she does.

  • dougjmiller

    Au contraire mon frere. There is nothing incompetent about Obama's foreign policy. He means to ruin America and destroy Israel. And so far he's been doing a damn good job. His bosses in the oil rich Arabian Peninsula would like the Shi-ite regime in Iran to disappear and they desire the elimination of the Jewish people. A short nuclear exchange between Iran and Israel would accomplish the mission. Obama is doing everything he can to see that this nuclear Holocaust occurs. After all, making the oil sheiks happy is what's it's all about.

  • BLJ

    Obama as POTUS is the worst nightmare of all time. This "man" is not fit to be a crossing guard let alone leader of the free world. He could care less about the security of this nation.

    He is closer to his friends in the Muslim Brotherhood and the Kremlin than anything else. He is a disgrace to the office and if re-elected his second term will make the first one look like a garden party. Anyone who votes for him should be held responsible as well.

  • Ronald Johnston

    What most of the American people don't understand is that osama obama is a spy!!! He has been planted here by our enemies to destroy our country. He is a known druggie, a suspected homosexual, an illegal alien, and most likely a muslim!!!! Our representatives, senators and supreme court should all be impeached for not vetting this evil man!!!!

  • Kimber

    i think his actions are deliberate. It is not a form of incompetence. He deliberately torched the ME forcing Israel into a corner surrounding Israel by the MB and more enemies than ever. He knows exactly what he is doing. He hates Israel and he will use the Muslims to bring them down.

  • danseagull

    OBAMA WILL BE OUT ORGANIZING IN THE COMMUNITY AFTER THE NOVEMBER ELECTIONS …. BS IS WHAT OBAMA HAS BEEN SHOVELING HIS WHOLE LIFE …AS A COMMUNITY ORGANIZER AND THEN AS PRESIDENT …. NOTHING BUT BS !!!! WELL , IN A FEW MORE MONTHS YOU CAN RETIRE , HAVING ONLY MADE THINGS MUCH , MUCH WORSE IN THIS COUNTRY !!!! GOOD RIDDANCE , AND DON'T LET THE DOOR HIT YOU IN THE ASS !!!

  • ponyboy99

    'Sorry. I couldn't stand but about five minutes of this guy's complaining. Had he been doing his job (working to have the usurper arrested and prosecuted) for the last four years most of what he's yammering about might not have come to pass. I think the world of DH, but not so some of the people he touts here.

  • SoCalMike

    I like Ed but I am sick and tired of Rupubes complaining about Obamas LEAST offensive things while avoiding his most important assumptions and most MALIGNANT tumors.

  • http://www.maghrebchristians.com Youssef

    Tunisia’s government is marking the 10th anniversary of the al-Qaida bombing attack that killed 21 people at the synagogue on the island of Djerba.

    Read more: http://www.maghrebchristians.com/2012/04/11/tunis

    Youssef