The Great Debate: David Goldman vs. Robert Spencer — on The Jamie Glazov Show


Join the Jamie Glazov Show that aired on Tuesday, January 17, 2012 at 8-9 pm Pacific (11-12 pm EST) on Blog Talk Radio. This week we featured: The Great Debate: Was communism a greater threat than Islam?

Two titans went toe-to-toe:

David P. Goldman, the author of the new book, How Civilizations Die (and Why Islam is Dying, Too). After 9/11, he began writing weekly essays at Asia Times Online under the byline “Spengler.” After joining the masthead of First Things magazine early in 2009, he revealed his identity and devoted himself to writing, mainly on politics and strategy, but also publishing essays on religion, classical music, literature and mathematics.

and

Robert Spencer, the director of Jihad Watch, a program of the David Horowitz Freedom Center, and the author of ten books, including two New York Times bestsellers, The Truth About Muhammad and The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) (both Regnery).

To listen to the program, click here.

Or go to: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/radio-jihad/2012/01/18/the-jamie-glazov-show

See you next Tuesday night!

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle. Click here.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    In my opinion the greatest threat to the West emanating from Islam today comes from mass Muslim immigration from the Islamic world to the West, as mass Muslim immigration to the West is really non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme, and it occurs today throughout the West completely unopposed.

    Thus, because mass Muslim immigration to the West, which is non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad and by design isn't violent, it isn't construed as being terrorism, and if it isn't construed as being terrorism, then it isn't opposed. As jihad, which in stark contrast to terrorism can be both violent and non-violent, is always conflated with terrorism, which as its name implies is always only violent. Hence, because non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad by design isn't violent, it isn't opposed.

    Nevertheless, the threat emanating from non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad, i.e., mass Muslim immigration to the West for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest, relative to violent jihad is astronomically far greater. Yet, thanks to PC multiculturalism, because non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad isn't construed as being terrorism, since it isn't violent, it isn't opposed.

    • crackerjack

      Apparently the "Elders of Zion" have mutated into "The Elders of Islam". ;-)

  • Harihar

    Comminism was dead within a generation, islam has grown from strength to strength over a millennium and a half. Communism was a product of an economic experiment in the face face of newly established industrial society. islam has nothing to do with this. It is all about the cult of Mohammad and,,as Robert has said, has deployed the stealth mode that is almost invisible to our politicians, media and acedemia.

    US only came to know the violence and hate of islam after 9/11, look beyoud 9/11, try to see what islam has done to the ancient cultures of the Indian civilisation, its destruction and conversion and you begin, if you're luck, to get to see what you've got in store for yourselves in the West.

    • Glennd1

      You are so ignorant, it's hard to know where to start. Marx wrote his work in the mid 19th cengury – certainly longer than a generation ago. And the moral superiority of collectivism that he asserted is accepted as truth by many of the world's intellectual elite – including the folks who kept India in poverty for 50 yrs after winning its freedom.

      As for us not knowing the history of Islam – what, do you think Americans don't study history? Some do – some don't but here's what I'm certain of. We are in no need of a lecture from the likes of you.