Town Hall on Terror in Los Angeles, May 1, 2012


Town Hall on Terror

In its own words, the Muslim Brotherhood is engaged in a “grand Jihad” with the intention of “eliminating and destroying Western civilization from within.” Like it or not, we are in a showdown with evil. But what exactly is the nature of the threat we face and how can we best confront it?

We want YOU to join the discussion. “Town Hall on Terror” is the first in a series of Town Hall meetings sponsored by Children of Jewish Holocaust Survivors and the David Horowitz Freedom Center, to allow your voice to be heard.

Your host is Jamie Glazov, editor of Frontpagemag.com and author of United in Hate and Showdown with Evil.

The four panelists who will kick off the discussion are:

Nonie Darwish, author of the new book The Devil We Don’t Know.

Mark Tapson, Shillman Journalism Fellow at David Horowitz Freedom Center.

Bosch Fawstin, creator of the superhero Pigman, the jihadist’s worst nightmare.

and

Dwight Schultz, Hollywood actor and expert on Hollywood and media bias.

Tuesday, May 1, 2012
6:30 p.m. Sign in
7p.m. Start of program

Sherman Oaks Woman’s Club
4808 Kester Ave.
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403

For purposes of meaningful discussion, there will be limited seating, so RSVP NOW!
It’s your turn to come and be heard!

 $20 per person – cash or check at the door
Register by email at RSVP@cjhsla.org
For more information call 818-704-0523

A Jamie Glazov Production (Assisted by Doris Wise Montrose).

For more information, click here.

  • Schlomotion

    I have a grand suggestion. Why don't Jews just stop holding racist roadshows about Muslims? Isn't that a novel idea? It's easy: If you're Jewish, just don't sponsor a show that's about Muslims. When the little light bulb goes on over your skullcap and you go "ah," just turn the little lightbulb off and don't do what you were just about to do. Non-Jews will like you better. Muslims will like you better. Your fellow Jews will like you better.

    • catmann

      Probably because there is a concerted effort of Muslims spreading lies about the Jews, the Jewish State and the fetid Muslim terrorist agenda which has been written and expressed by such luminares as Adjem Coundray and his fuzzy faced friends (among others)

      • Schlomotion

        Maybe one day The Jewish State and its propagandists might be able to speak as if they are the masters of their own actions instead of the poor, sad victims of Muslims in every matter from book publication to finding a parking space.

        • Amaroq

          They are the masters of their own actions. Which is why the world gets so pissed off whenever they defend themselves against the violent Palestinians.

          Israel is a free country, and since its people have been free to create in a free market, their economy is prosperous and thus their country is powerful. The surrounding Muslim countries are not free, so they’re basically third world countries armed with missile launchers. When the child kicks the gorilla in the shin and gets squashed for it, the world demonizes the gorilla because in their eyes, the weak is always good and the strong is always evil.

          • Schlomotion

            Good point about Israel being a gorilla.

    • Amaroq

      Here’s a grand suggestion. Why don’t the Muslim apologists stop propping up violent religions on pedestals. Isn’t that a novel idea? It’s easy: If you’re a Muslim apologist, just don’t give moral support to people who blow themselves up in order to kill infidels. When the little light bulb refuses to turn on over your head and you go “ah”, don’t do what you were just about to do. Rational people will like you better.

      • Schlomotion

        I agree with that too.

  • SCREW SOCIALISM

    Schlockmoron,

    Happy Eternal Nakba to you and osama bin ladens camp followers of jihadis, terrorsits, useful dhimmis and socialists!

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Someone needs to inform Jamie Glasov that Muslims never ever fight terrorism in the cause of Allah. That Muslims fight jihad in the cause of Allah instead, which constitutes both violent and non-violent means of jihad in stark contrast to terrorism that only employs violence. Indeed, only jihad is holy fighting in the cause of Allah, while terrorism, on the other hand, can be for any number of various political causes and is always perpetrated by political extremists that are non-Muslims.

    Hence Jamie stop spreading misinformation about Islam and please start spreading the truth instead. There is too much misinformation out there already.

    • southwood

      Where are you getting this nonsense from ? Jihad INCLUDES terrorism. Their prophet exhorts them to "strike terror" into the hearts of infidels. Your distinction between violent jihad and terrorism is absurd. They are one and the same.

      "…while terrorism, on the other hand, can be for any number of various political causes and is always perpetrated by political extremists that are non-Muslims."

      This is just rubbish.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Where are you getting this nonsense from ? Jihad INCLUDES terrorism.

        Nonsense? What nonsense? PC multiculturalism and morally equating all cultures and their idiosyncrasies together to make all civilizations, cultures, and societies appear to be equal is pure utter nonsense. Jihad does not include terrorism, as jihad and terrorism are two mutually exclusive manifestations and two entirely distinct and very different things altogether. Moreover, it's not my fault that you are apparently too blinded by PC multiculturalism to see the not very nuanced distinctions between them.

        Their prophet exhorts them to "strike terror" into the hearts of infidels.

        Uhm….despite the fact the above is a translation of classical Arabic into English, which doesn't have comparable matching words, why can't violent jihad as opposed to terrorism strike terror into the hearts?

        Indeed, jihad is holy fighting in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme and constitutes total warfare that employs both violent and non-violent means of jihad. Whereas terrorism, on the other hand, as its name implies is always only violent, is perpetrated for any number of political causes, and is the product of non-Muslim extremists.

        Only people that are blinded by PC multiculturalism make the idiotic mistake of conflating and morally equating terrorism with violent jihad, while ignoring at the same time covert and deceptive non-violent jihad, as the only similarity between the two entirely mutually exclusive manifestations is the violence and the terror it creates.

        Moreover, this PC multicultural practice of always conflating and morally equating jihad, which is total warfare that employs both violent and non-violent means of jihad, with terrorism, which can only be violent, causes the West today to totally ignore covert and deceptive non-violent jihad, such as mass Muslim immigration to the West for the purpose of mass Muslim infiltration and stealth demographic conquest, since if it isn't violent, it is construed as being terrorism, and if it isn't construed as being terrorism, then it isn't contested or opposed, and never mind the fact that covert and deceptive non-violent jihad is employed by the Islamic world against the West astronomically far more prevalently and constitutes an exponentially far greater threat to the peace and security of the West relative to violent jihad. Which, per the dictates of PC multiculturalism, you apparently naively conflate and morally equate as being terrorism. Indeed, while in appearance violent jihad and terrorism may appear to be identical, the truth is they are both motivated and perpetrated for entirely different reasons altogether.

        As a matter of fact, covert and deceptive non-violent jihad is the primary threat that emanates from Islam today and not violent jihad in which you conflate and morally equate as being terrorism per the dictates of PC multiculturalism, and as most people naively believe. Indeed, outlaw Islam and ban and reverse mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage and the threat of violent jihad on the homeland will be virtually eliminated altogether, and at the same time the far greater threat emanating from mass Muslim infiltration and stealth demographic conquest will also be eliminated as well.

        Your distinction between violent jihad and terrorism is absurd. They are one and the same.

        Conflating and morally equating jihad with terrorism per the dictates of PC multiculturalism is what is absurd and they most certainly are not one and the same. Indeed, just like non-Muslims never perpetrate jihad, Muslims never perpetrate terrorism, as that would be blasphemy, which is a capital offense under Islam. Hence, when Muslims publicly denounce terrorism they are being truthful, but then again terrorism and jihad are two entirely distinct and very different manifestations altogether.

        This is just rubbish.

        What is rubbish is PC multiculturalism and conflating and morally equating jihad with terrorism per the dictates of PC multiculturalism so that all civilizations, cultures, and societies appear to be equal and the same. Indeed, I can promise you that Islamic civilization isn't remotely equal or the same as Western civilization.

        • southwood

          Sir,

          If Boko Haram attack Christians in Nigeria ask the Christians whether it's jihad or terrorism because they won't deny it's terrorism. And the Christians there know all about jihad. They are not PC. The motive for the terrorism might be in the doctrine of jihad but it is still terrorism. It has nothing to do with being PC. It is like one of those groups who who claim they are not terrorists but really freedom fighters. Just because they claim it is jihad does not stop it being terrorism just as blowing oneself up in the cause of jihad is still suicide. You are playing about with words. Show me where Islam calls terrorism blasphemy. It propagates, it blesses, terrorism.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            If Boko Haram attack Christians in Nigeria ask the Christians whether it's jihad or terrorism because they won't deny it's terrorism.

            I don't deny the reality that most people in the world have been blinded by PC multiculturalism exactly like you, as that is exceedingly obvious. Nevertheless, Boko Haram is a violent jihadists group as their aim in intimidating and attacking Christians is to make Islam supreme, and whether you are too unhinged to realize it or not, it is nevertheless jihad, i.e., holy fighting in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme, as opposed to terrorism.

            Meanwhile, show me a definition of terrorism where it says that terrorism is holy fighting in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme. Terrorism, on the other hand, is indiscriminate violence perpetrated by political extremists for various political causes. Jihad, on the other hand, is always only in the cause of Allah and it is never indiscriminate, as it is always perpetrated against non-Muslim unbelievers.

            Moreover, jihadists are not extremists like terrorists. Instead, jihadists are mainstream orthodox Muslims. As a matter of fact, all mainstream orthodox Muslims on earth are jihadists. A tiny minority of them are violent jihadists, while the vast overwhelming majority of them are covert and deceptive non-violent jihadists, and the few that are not jihadists are not Muslims at all, but instead blasphemous apostates that per the dictates of mainstream orthodox Islam must be executed.

            Apparently, not only are you blinded to the hilt by PC multiculturalism, but you are also obviously incredibly ignorant of Islam as well.

            And the Christians there know all about jihad.

            Yeah right, they know about Jihad about as much as you know about jihad, which isn't saying much since you are nearly oblivious of Islam.

            They are not PC.

            Maybe not, I don't know, but I do know that you, on the other hand, are blinded to the hilt by PC multiculturalism.

            The motive for the terrorism might be in the doctrine of jihad but it is still terrorism.

            See what I mean…you have been so blinded by PC multiculturalism that you can't stop conflating and morally equating jihad, which is total warfare that employs both violent and non-violent means, but primarily non-violent means, with terrorism, which as its name implies is always only violent, even after the obvious distinguishing characteristics between the two entirely distinct and mutually exclusive manifestations have been thoroughly explained to you. In other words, not only are you blinded to the hilt by PC multiculturalism, but you are also incredibly hard headed and narrow-minded as well.

            It has nothing to do with being PC.

            No one ever said or suggested that terrorism has anything to do with political correctness other than you. Nonetheless, conflating and morally equating jihad with being terrorism, per the dictates of PC multiculturalism, is not only insane and but at the same time it is suicidal as well. Indeed, are you sure you are not John Brennan, Obama's chief of terrorism, since you and him seem to be addicted to the same idiotic circular logic, as both you loons love to call jihadists terrorists, while both being blinded to the hilt by PC multiculturalism at the same time.

            –continued below

          • ObamaYoMoma

            It is like one of those groups who who claim they are not terrorists but really freedom fighters.

            Man…what does terrorists claiming to be freedom fighters have to do with jihad, or otherwise what does countries mislabeling freedom fighters as being being terrorists have to do with jihad? Jihad is holy fighting in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme and constitutes total warfare that employs both violent and non-violent means of jihad, but primarily non-violent means. By the way, jihad is also the sixth and most important pillar of Islam and is an obligatory duty incumbent upon all Muslims on earth.

            While terrorism, on the other hand, which unlike jihad indiscriminately targets civilian non-combatants and is always only violent, in stark contrast to jihad, can be for any number of political causes, whereas jihad is strictly always only in the cause of Allah to make Islam supreme. Not to mention that because terrorism is a blasphemous act in Islam, it is also a capital offense. Which is also why Muslims readily denounce terrorism.

            Indeed, the only similarity between what is violent jihad, which is employed by the Islamic world against the West astronomically far less relative to covert and deceptive non-violent jihad, and terrorism, is they are both violent. However, they are both perpetrated for entirely different reasons and motivations altogether.

            Just because they claim it is jihad does not stop it being terrorism just as blowing oneself up in the cause of jihad is still suicide.

            In the cause of jihad? That's hilarious! Don't lose your day job in this economy, because you definitely won't get another.

            You are playing about with words. Show me where Islam calls terrorism blasphemy. It propagates, it blesses, terrorism.

            Study the sixth and most important pillar of Islam, which is holy fighting in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme and is an obligatory duty incumbent upon all Muslims. In stark contrast, terrorism, which isn't an obligatory duty, is perpetrated by political extremists that are non-Muslims, and can be for any number of political causes, is un-Islamic and therefore a blasphemous offense.

            Again, Jihad is holy fighting in the cause of Allah to make Islam supreme. Jihad is also an obligatory duty incumbent upon all Muslims on earth. No exceptions! Meanwhile, terrorism, on the other hand, is not an obligatory duty, is perpetrated by political extremists only that are non-Muslims for all sorts of different political reasons, and terrorism unlike jihad indiscriminately targets civilian non-combatants. While jihad, on the other hand, specifically and only targets either non-Muslim civilian non-combatants as in the Madrid Train Bombing or military combatants as US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. In other words, in stark contrast to terrorism, it doesn't indiscriminately target civilian non-combatants as in the case of terrorism.

            Moreover, jihadists are not extremists, i.e., Islamists or radical Muslims, as the doctrine of PC multiculturalism also erroneously alleges as well. As all jihadists are mainstream orthodox Muslims. You probably believe also like GWB that Islam is a so-called Religion of Peace™ being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists too. Indeed, you are probably that gullible!

            In fact, it couldn't be more obvious, you evidently don't have the first clue! Go fly a kite and stop challenging me with your utterly absurd nonsense.

          • southwood

            All of your statements are absolute garbage. Absolute idiotic nonsense. Be off with you, you time waster !

          • ObamaYoMoma

            All of your statements are absolute garbage. Absolute idiotic nonsense. Be off with you, you time waster !

            You are not only incredibly mentally incompetent, but you are also hilarious as well!

          • southwood

            You are just simply silly.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            If you want to see silly, read your own lame posts. Indeed, had I known you were that mentally incompetent, that blinded by PC multiculturalism, and that ignorant of Islam I never would have wasted my time responding. Indeed, you are as mentally handicapped as leftwing Republicans like John McCain and Lindsey Graham. In fact, moonbats like you that have infiltrated the Republican Party is the reason I'm no longer a Republican.

          • southwood

            Haha ! you're a riot. Wrong about everything.

            A RIOT !

  • http://www.maghrebchristians.com Youssef

    Morocco’s justice minister said he would not stop the trial of an outspoken rapper charged with insulting the authorities in one of his songs, despite an outcry from rights campaigners who say the case is an attack on freedom of expression.

    Read more: http://www.maghrebchristians.com/2012/04/30/moroc

    Youssef