Alger Hiss: Why He Chose Treason

Pages: 1 2

Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Christina Shelton, a retired US intelligence analyst; she spent the major part of her thirty-two year career (twenty two years) working as a Soviet analyst and a Counterintelligence Branch Chief at the Defense Intelligence Agency. She is the author of the new book, Alger Hiss: Why He Chose Treason.

FP: Christina Shelton, welcome to Frontpage Interview.

Shelton: Thank you, Mr. Glazov.

FP: Let’s begin with you telling us what inspired you to write this book.

Shelton: I have always had an abiding interest in both the Soviet Union and the intriguing world of espionage.  For the first major paper I wrote in high school a very long time ago, I chose the subject: “Stalin’s Forced Labor Camps.”  My interest continued at George Washington University where I studied at the Sino-Soviet Institute.  This led to a career in the Intelligence Community that covered counterintelligence in general and Soviet military and intelligence services in particular.  For a couple of years before I retired from the government in 2009, I thought about writing a book, despite the fact that I had spent thirty-two years writing intelligence assessments.  And the subject of Hiss “came to me” in a very natural way.  Except for the Rosenbergs, Alger Hiss is probably the most famous American spy of the 20th century.  The case has all the trappings of a great story–a struggle between two titans (Hiss and Whittaker Chambers), a fallen idol, a divided nation over Hiss’s innocence or guilt, all occurring against the background of the important years in American history during the Great Depression and World War II. This story has drama – unlike the current cases where an individual spies for money.

FP: Share with us some of the evidence that has surfaced over the recent years that confirms Hiss was a spy.

Shelton: The most important evidence in recent years on Hiss’s role as a Soviet spy was revealed in KGB files and Hungarian state security records. The KGB archival material represents a significant breakthrough in shedding light on the KGB’s extensive penetration of the US government during the 1930s and 1940s.  In 1993, former KGB official Alexander Vassiliev was given access to KGB files.  After he defected, he had a friend send his notebooks of transcribed KGB documents to him.  Based on this material, John Earl Haynes, Harvey Klehr, and Vassiliev wrote Spies: the Rise and Fall of the KGB in America (2009).  Even though the material was from KGB files, there was some information on the GRU’s asset, Hiss.  In some cables, Hiss’s cover name was used, in others his name was cited in clear text. (Hiss had several cover names, among them ‘Jurist,’ ‘Leonard,’ and ‘Ales.’) One of the most damning KGB cables included a March 1950 document that noted  “the trial of the GRU agent ‘Leonard’ (Hiss) a division chief at the State Department and member of ‘Karl’s group’ (Chambers), had ended in his conviction at the beginning of 1950.”   Hiss was convicted in January 1950. It doesn’t get clearer than that!

Noel Field, a Communist, and former State Department colleague and friend of Hiss during the 1930s was arrested in Eastern Europe after the war and charged with being an American spy. Stalin had falsely accused him as part of his overall campaign to purge Eastern Europe’s Communist leaders. In 1992, Hungarian archivist, Maria Schmidt found the original transcripts of Field’s interrogation by Soviet and Hungarian state security.  In it, Field acknowledged that Hiss tried to recruit him in the 1930s in Washington DC.  Field said he told Hiss – in a moment of poor tradecraft – that he already worked for the Soviets as part of a KGB network (run by Hede Massing). This story of the attempted recruitment of Field by Hiss was corroborated by Chambers, Massing, and was in the KGB archival material.

FP: What does your book do that no book has done before?

Shelton: Most other books on Hiss focus on “the case.” In this book, I attempt to provide a strategic perspective, unique in the body of Hiss literature, by examining the case in the context of ideology. To understand Hiss and his actions, they must be seen from the perspective of what motivated his behavior – that is, his ideology.  I also emphasize the historical significance of the story based on Hiss’s role in foreign policy, specifically his importance in the founding of the UN and at the Yalta Conference.  Conventional wisdom is that Hiss was peripheral at Yalta; a low-level note taker.  In fact, evidence points to the centrality of his role at Yalta, as manifested in Secretary of State Stettinius’s diaries and personal papers.  In addition, I was able to portray the personal side and human dimension of Hiss with regard to his relationship with his first wife Priscilla and especially his son Tony. This caring, affectionate person is reflected in the hundreds of personal letters given to the NYU Tamiment Library by Tony Hiss.   His father was an inveterate letter writer and the library folders contain hundreds of letters written in the 1930s and during his 44 months in Lewisburg Federal prison.  As far as I know, this material, recently turned over to NYU, is not included in any other book on Hiss. And finally, although the most recent material from the KGB archives was covered in a book on overall espionage in the US in the 1930s and 1940s, for the first time all available evidence on Hiss is in a book specifically about Hiss.  This book contains the recent KGB information with regard to Hiss as well as material from the Hungarian archives.

FP: What damage did Hiss do to America?

Shelton:  Alger Hiss spied for the GRU (Soviet military intelligence).  Because GRU operational files never have been made available, the extent of Hiss’s damage is difficult to measure.  A damage assessment can be made directly only on a very small body of documentary evidence — documents of confidential military, State Department, and Navy cables Hiss gave to Chambers in the early months of 1938 (i.e. the so-called Pumpkin papers). These included, among others, summaries of cables by Ambassador Bullitt detailing pre-war events in Europe; activities of members of the anti-Comintern Pact, particularly in Asia, and detailed developments in China.  Therefore, because only a small amount of the many documents Hiss passed during several years are available a damage assessment also must be based on deductive reasoning. We know Hiss was a spy and we know he had access to highly classified material.  He had means, motive, and opportunity.  From his post at the State Department, Hiss had access to classified material on many issues, including US-China policy.  One specific example of deductive reasoning involves a State Department document relevant at the Yalta Conference.  Secretary of State Stettinius placed Hiss in charge of the “black books” – all the position papers for FDR on US strategy on issues to be discussed at Yalta. All this State Department material was to go directly to Hiss. One position paper noted that the State Department strongly opposed turning over to the USSR the southern Kurile and Sakhalin islands.  This memo never made it into the Yalta briefing books; Roosevelt thus was not aware of it, and therefore of State’s position.  Roosevelt conceded these territorial demands by Stalin.  But Stalin knew this position from his spy networks; a copy of this State Department memo was found in the Russian archives after the fall of the USSR.  So it was not only what Hiss gave to Moscow, but in this instance what he withheld from the US side that allowed him to influence plans and policy.

From Moscow’s assessment of Hiss, one could also deduce his value as an asset and the significance of the information he turned over to the Soviets. The GRU considered Hiss to be one of Moscow’s most important spies; evidence indicates he presumably was among the 5 GRU assets from the Washington DC apparatus that, according to Red Star, received Soviet decorations following the Yalta Conference in February 1945.  Moreover, following GRU defections and Stalin’s purges in his intelligence services in the late 1930s, GRU networks were in chaos and spies were being transferred to the KGB.  But not Hiss.  Indeed, a Soviet official in the KGB archives noted that if the KGB had ‘Jurist’ (Hiss) “no one else would really be needed.” Clearly, the GRU wanted to retain their high value asset.  This judgment of Hiss would have been based on the quality of his information and his ability to influence US policy toward Moscow from his post at the State Department.

Moreover, it was of great value to Moscow that it was able to use the documents Hiss had turned over to his GRU contact to break the State Department codes and tap into American diplomatic traffic.  This access, alone, to State Department plans and intentions prior to the onset of war would be invaluable to the Soviets. Sumner Welles, undersecretary of State (1937-1943) testified that the documents Hiss turned over to Chambers were critical to US security and specifically valuable to Moscow’s efforts to break US diplomatic codes.

Pages: 1 2

  • scotsirish

    ….."Despite Stalin's mass murders, Moscow had seduced many Americans………to support The Solviet Union, to
    place internationalism above national loyality."

    This says it all. Treason is treason and the veil has been lifted……but again the denial is so deep.

  • clarespark

    A very concise interview. There was good reason to suspect the New Deal progressives for collectivist propaganda. I recommend this summary of mine of their appropriation of Nazi or German techniques of mind-management in the late 1930s-early 1940s by the most respectable progressive leaders. See http://clarespark.com/2010/04/18/links-to-nazi-sy…. Read all four segments. It is shocking material.

  • AntiSharia

    Hiss will always have supporters, it's sad but true that there are people that prefer their fantasy to reality. But as John Adams said it best "facts are stubborn things" Hiss was a spy and FDR's administration was crammed full of Marxists. Roosevelt knew and didn't care. He couldn't admit that he allowed communists into the government, and besides they wanted to expand the power of the state as much as he did so what did FDR care?

    • Tom

      FDR was just as much of a communist as the rest…he was just better at disguising it. Worthless destroyer of all that America stood for. If one looks at his blatant effort to "pack" the supreme court in order to get around the constitution's limited government philosophy of the times, it is clear that the rule of law meant nothing to him. That, alone, is the key mark of a pure communist. The ends justify the means. We have another in that office today! We need to rid our country of all of them, Til we do, there will be constant turmoil and too many setbacks.

  • tagalog

    It becomes increasingly clearer year after year that Whitaker Chambers had his finger on the truth of collectivism and republican democracy. Whitaker Chambers, who was so roundly excoriated for all his shortcomings up to and including the state of his teeth.

  • Western Spirit

    Some people like being a collectivist, a borg, because in this way they escape being alone, which is what we all are essentially, an individual and alone in life and death.

    original people, though, can't stand being confined to being a robot in a collective and rebel. that's why the creative are the first to go under the blade in a collective,

  • Indioviejo

    Very good interview, and I will buy this book. Alger Hiss' has puppils through out govenment today. The spying against our nation, the entrenched hatred, the seeding of communist goverment workers is evident. The culmination of ereding our nation's values came with the election of the Manchurian POTUS. His real work of destruction is happening before our eyes and most applaud it.

  • Ghostwriter

    His family called him a "nice,caring man." I wonder what they would have said of him if the Soviets took over this country and they'd be on the first trains to the new gulags.

  • Larry

    Hiss and his fellow communists in the SD were the ones who so carefully gave the advice to Marshall that saw him sell out the Nationalists in China just when they were in the process of destroying the PLA. Their actions were backed up by H.D. White at Treasury who screwed the Kuomingtang on funding.

  • Gloria Stewart

    I am very much looking forward to reading Ms Shelton's book. May I suggest another book to readers of Front Page? Whittaker Chambers' book Witness is the best book to read to understand the appeal that Marxism has to people – the siren song that its devotees such as Alger Hiss hear when they study it. Chambers called Communism the second oldest religion in the world. It tells what happens when you hear the whispered words "You can be like God".

    Shortly before Hiss' death his attorney wrote to General Dmitry Volkogonov, the then curator of the recently opened Soviet archives. He said that his client was blind and near death and wanted exoneration. What Volkogonov said was widely misinterpreted. He said in effect that he could find nothing in his archives that tied Alger Hiss to spying for the Soviet Union. The truth was – and Volkogonov almost immediately clarified this – that the archives contained KGB files, and Hiss worked with the GRU and the Comintern.

    Actually the US broke the Soviet code during World War II and knew of Hiss' activities. We could not let on as this would cause the Soviets to change the code. We called the decoded papers the Venona Transcripts. Despite what President Truman said during the Hiss-Chambers controversy, he knew the truth and feared that spy revelations would harm the Democratic party. At the time of Chambers' testimony Hiss was the head of the Carnegie Foundation where he could do no harm. He escaped a trial for espionage because the statute of limitations had expired for espionage during a time when the US was not at war. He suffered a relatively mild penalty for perjury for one who altered history to the detriment of the West.

    • Maxie

      "Despite what President Truman said during the Hiss-Chambers controversy, he knew the truth and feared that spy revelations would harm the Democratic party."

      Thus validating the old assertion that, for Democrats, it has always been party before country. Very much in evidence in the current regime. For the Left, hatred for the conservative worldview is all-consuming.

  • joy52

    Interesting the influence of the Státe Dept.

  • http://www.moneytime.com.au/blog/?p=1 Johnnie

    Hey there! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a team of volunteers and starting a new initiative in a community in the same niche.
    Your blog provided us useful information to work on.
    You have done a outstanding job!