A Terrorist’s Canadian Homecoming

Jerry Gordon is the Sr. Vice President of the World Encounter Institute and Sr. Editor for the New English Review. 


Ezra Levant in an op-ed in a Wall Street Journal, “Out of Guantanamo and Into a Canadian Prison,” raises some unanswered  questions about  who and why a deal was cut between the Obama Administration and the Harper Government in Ottawa.

Two years ago this month, a Guantanamo Bay military jury sentenced a Canadian-born al Qaeda terrorist to 40 years in prison. Omar Khadr was convicted of war crimes in Afghanistan, including the killing, during an ambush, of a 28-year-old U.S. Special Forces medic named Christopher Speer, the father of two young children.

But what the jury didn’t know was that, even as they were deliberating the charges of “murder in violation of the law of war, attempted murder in violation of the law of war, conspiracy, providing material support for terrorism, and spying,” Pentagon prosecutors had already struck a plea-bargain deal with Khadr, at the direction of Obama administration officials.

No public explanation for the deal has ever been given.

In an Iconoclast blog post on the US flight that delivered Khadr to a Federal Canadian prison last Saturday, we noted Canadian counterterrorism expert David B. Harris’ comments on the reasons behind Khadr’s release by the Obama administration in an August New English Review interview:

However, one of the disturbing considerations in this particular situation, especially given the animus reserved by a great many Canadians for the currently imprisoned Omar Khadr, is the suggestion that the Canadian government may be bowing to pressure from the Obama White House to repatriate Khadr. According to various reports, the White House is desperately interested in reducing the number of people currently being held at Guantanamo. It is supposed that this pressure from the Obama Administration is politically motivated and stems from Mr. Obama’s preoccupation with the approaching November elections. It remains to be seen what the details of any transfer agreement might amount to.

We noted at the conclusion of Iconoclast post:

Harris’s comments about President Obama’s desire to close the GITMO detention facility are prescient, given the  recently published list of   55 detainees, many of whom will likely return to terrorist activities, 31 others would be sent to third countries, leaving 167 detainees.

All of which brings us back to what happened during the GITMO military tribunal during the summer and fall of 2010.

Many forget that Khadr’s trial was underway in August 2010, at a time that he and his advocates were claiming his innocence. Prosecutors, contrary to Levant’s WSJ article, had no interest in pleading the case, and were most confident in their case.

At the opening of proceedings, the defense made the dramatic gesture of putting up a photo of an allegedly grievously wounded Khadr to make the point that Khadr was too wounded to have killed Sgt. Christopher Speer. Minutes later, the Special Forces soldier who wounded Khadr after he killed Speer, pointed out in precise and irrefutable detail how that seemingly compelling photo represented not Khadr, but killed al-Qaeda fighters on the scene. It was a decisive moment as the air was literally sucked out of the room of Omar Khadr’s defense. Yet this was virtually unreported by Khadr apologist Canadian media such as the Globe and Mail, Toronto Star, CBC, Al Jazeera, The New York Times and Miami Herald. That testimony effectively crushed the Khadr defense. Just as Military Tribunal Judge Parrish’s earlier ruling that Khadr’s confessions to interrogators would be admitted.

Minutes later, while the Special Forces soldier witness was still on the witness stand, defense counsel, Lt. Col. Jon Jackson literally collapsed in the middle of the courtroom. (In a bizarre scene, an emergency tech refused to administer to the stricken Lt. Col. Jackson because he was under specific orders to be at the courtroom only if something were to happen to Mr. Khadr). Jackson, an otherwise picture of strapping health who had been vigorous all day up to the point of his apparent collapse, then underwent “tests.” In the meantime, Judge Parrish suspended the proceedings until Jackson “returned to full health.” Over a month later, Jackson was still undergoing “tests’ for what turned out to be a gall bladder’ operation.

In the interim, a confident prosecution, determined to prosecute Khadr for the murder of an American soldier, astonishingly agreed to a plea agreement with the Khadr defense team. This happenstance came from nowhere, and considering the escalating momentum of the Khadr prosecution, in a trial underway, it was, as Levant wrote, as if the United States had thrown the fight.

After all of the spin and misinformation about Khadr being brainwashed by his terrorist father, and allegedly  tortured by the Americans (who had saved his life and restored his health), Khadr pleaded guilty in great detail to being far more than a killer but an active adherent of al-Qaeda.

Dr. Michael Welner’s, detailed and comprehensive forensic psychiatric expert testimony was fully transparent and his video interview of Khadr supplemented an array of numerous collateral sources.  That materially rebutted Khadr’s defense and press apologists’ efforts to rebrand him, as a child warrior victim.

The same sentencing proceeding also featured a Khadr “apology” from the stand that was so unconvincing  that  defense counsel Jackson was compelled the next day, in court, to read another “apology,” in the Lt. Col’s own words.  The jury‘s verdict of a 40 year sentence was a rebuke of the defense effort and confirmation of Khadr’s admission of guilt as a jihadist terrorist.

Which returns us to the question: with a runaway verdict, why did the talented United States military prosecutors basically quit on a trial for Khadr – only to show the same determination at a sentencing proceeding? The answer is, because they answer to higher authorities in the Pentagon.

Clearly, someone in the Pentagon or in the Obama Administration intervened during the August suspension of the Khadr GITMO tribunal to force the shocking plea that included Khadr’s return to Canada.

So the mystery remains as to whom in the Pentagon hierarchy or Oval Office overrode the Military Tribunal and prosecution of the killer of an American soldier. Was it President Obama? Secretary Gates? Whoever it was, Sgt. Christopher Speer’s family as was Layne Morris, who had been wounded in a firefight, was denied justice.

Was the U.S. State Department so invested in forcing Canada to take Khadr back, knowing Canadian courts will likely parole him? All of this was agreed before anyone learned of the renowned Dr. Welner’s findings, which prompted Canada to react like any buyer of an erroneous bargain.

Was the intrusion into the military proceedings an abuse of executive powers aiding and abetting release of confirmed Jihadist terrorists, and contravening authorized military justice?

Given the answers to these and other fundamental questions, it would seem that this is grist for a Congressional oversight investigation and hearing.

Levant revealed the writings of one of Canadian Foreign Ministry staff who shed tears of joy for the arrival in Canada of this former al Qaeda Jihadist. This was eerily similar to accounts of the U.S. State Department “observers” of the Khadr proceedings who essentially acted as Khadr defense cheerleaders. The Khadr legacy has been now trumped, perhaps fittingly.  The divide apparently remains between our military that defends this country against foreign Jihadis, and diplomatic  and  other government officials that all too frequently give aid and comfort to our enemies.

Our thoughts are with the Speer and Morris families, because the thoughts of Khadr and his benefactors in the Obama Administration are not.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • Andy

    Any child born into a Muslim family can be categorized as a victim since all Muslims are victims of a lunatic ideology masquerading as a religion – with no way out since apostasy brings the death sentence. Sadly, any child brainwashed in this ideology before its teens is lost and cannot be trusted. Obama's early schooling in Muslim schools provides a fair example.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      "Any child born into a Muslim family can be categorized as a victim since all Muslims are victims of a lunatic ideology masquerading as a religion – with no way out since apostasy brings the death sentence."

      Sure, but let's place that in the correct context. He was a victim of birth circumstances (family, etc.) He was not a victim of his own later actions. He is a criminal fifth columnist responsible for his actions, regardless of previous circumstantial victim-hood. Having the label "victim" is meaningless without context, or placed in the wrong context as you have done.

      "Sadly, any child brainwashed in this ideology before its teens is lost and cannot be trusted."

      This is wise counsel with the provision that you have overstated the problems. No person's destiny is fixed. Ironically, you've bought in to Islam-consistent fatalism. Certainly one needs to know the ideology of anyone before they can be trusted.

      "Obama's early schooling in Muslim schools provides a fair example."

      Sort of true…but Obama is not from the same school (school of thinking) as this terrorist. His childhood Indonesian gave him a false idea about Islam's ability to be integrated in a modern society. It is only the ancient traditions of the Indonesians that allows them to intuitively reject a lot of Islamic theology without realizing what they've done.

      My observation is that taqiyya works in reverse at times. Politicians needs Western support and feign moderation, which allows the less-than hardcore believers to fall back on tradition rather than adhering to Sharia. It allows Western cultural values to seep in too. The Indonesian jihadis understand the need for taqiyya and bide their time, picking their fights carefully.

      All the while, children are allowed a lot more freedom than anyone else. Any child spending the time in Indonesia that Obama did could easily miss the blatant oppression of women, and general chaos. Hawaii and Indonesia would be very similar if not for the Islamic influence. Indonesia is like one huge garbage dump because of Islamic fatalism, lack of tolerance for dissent, and all the other evils we know of from Islam. It is slightly more moderate because of the difficulty in enforcing Sharia among so many diverse ethnic traditions. For example, there is no way that a woman can expect to raise her child without public breastfeeding unless she is rich. Imagine the Saudi-style Sharia police killing so many mothers to make their point. In Indonesia, it would defy common sense. Islamic hegemony never took root in a consistent way.

      That is why first the colonial rulers and then Western aid saved the nation from a worse fate. That is why you have an apparently moderate Islamic government. They have no choice really. Plus this gives room to maneuver to truly moderate politicians, but nobody really knows which ones those are.

      It's a mess, but not the worst. I'm only offering this much detail because it leaves open the possibility that Obama is a dupe of Islam. He's still a treasonous, anti-American dupe of Soviet Communism too, so it's not like I'm defending him. If we want to be heard by skeptics, we need to be honest and accurate.

      Obama's an idiot when it comes to Islam, and he's a communist radical that believes in the lies of the "new historians" like Howard Zinn and all who quote Zinn or that absurd book, or any of its deceptive predecessors.

  • Shandrill

    Ezra Levent wrote an op-ed piece for the Wall Street Journal? I have lost faith in the WSJ now. To allow this radical right wing hate and fear mongering, factless individual – who is neither a journalist or a writer but the Canadian version of Glenn Beck – to sully the pages of a (once) reputable newspaper is a dark day indeed for print media and a mistake I hope will never be made again.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      "To allow this radical right wing hate and fear mongering, factless individual"

      Straighten us out, oh great, wise one.

      "to sully the pages of a (once) reputable newspaper is a dark day indeed for print media "

      This isn't a tryout for some reality show. Save the drama for venues with people who care about it.

  • Ghostwriter

    I wouldn't mind if the Canadians never let Khadir out of prison. This lunatic shouldn't be running around loose.