Press Freedom Under Attack in Latin America

Pages: 1 2

Encouraged by that legal victory, Correa has moved to further restrict press freedom. Last month, Ecuador’s national assembly approved a media law that seriously limits what journalists can cover about political candidates during elections. The broadly worded law states that the media “will refrain from direct or indirect promotion, either through reports, specials or any other form of messaging, which would indicate a preference for or against a particular candidate, political principle, opinion, preference, electoral or political platform.” As concerned journalists have rightly pointed out, this amounts to a form of preemptive government censorship of election coverage. But with Correa set to seek reelection in 2013, it’s clear why his government would wish to be the arbiter of acceptable election coverage. Indeed, Correa has already taken on that role, regularly launching into long diatribes against “ignorant” journalists and other media “liars” on national television.

Nicaragua’s Daniel Ortega has also used his office to inveigh against the press. Journalists who dare to question his government find themselves denounced by Ortega as “devils,” “children of Goebels,” and “enemies of the Nicaraguan people.” If there were any illusions that the former Sandinista revolutionary is a reformed democrat, his attacks on the press have thoroughly dispelled them. In addition to personally berating journalists and creating a climate of intimidation against the press, Ortega has tried to silence critical media with defamation suits. Shunning all interviews, he has preferred to have pro-government media read his personal prepared statements, yet another way of silencing the independent press.

These are not isolated incidents. Determined to rule unopposed, Latin America’s new generation of autocrats have trampled on the democratic process in their countries and rigged the judiciaries to keep themselves in power. The independent media, or what remains of it, represents their last visible opposition. If they succeed in eliminating it, freedom in their countries will surely follow.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Pages: 1 2

  • Jorge

    I am from Ecuador and I am appalled at the amount of propaganda and hatred in this article. There is an unleashed disregard to portray the entire truth. I truly feel sorry for the readers that become misinformed and can take stances based on incomplete infor-mation.

    I will not stand up in defence of other states than of Ecuador (although I would like to) because I know most about my own country.

    When you affirm that "Correa [and other presidents]… have been unwilling to submit to the democratic scrutiny of the media." it really shows your level of astounding ig-norance of the latin-american and Ecuadorian political struggles and our history. I don't know how it works in the United States (where I guess you are from), but in Ec-uador the media is far from democratic. Only wealthy power groups hold in their power mass media. Far until 4 years ago more than 60% of national media was owned by the same groups that own banks. Please explain to me how you think that this case is democratic. I beg of you.

    • mrbean

      Spare me about your country's politicians and their "Esquadroes le Morte" so they can loot the private sectorand the wealthy for protection money, As for Chavez, he should do us all a favor a die – hopefully in great agony without morphine.

      • Luis

        The reality that you have in your mind is only yours.

  • Jorge

    On the other hand, we did vote in 2011 (this is democracy that you where looking for) in a referendum of 10 questions. Once of the questions asked if we want a Media Law that regulates abuses of the press. The overwhelming answer was yes with more than 62%. Would you agree that this is democratic?

    The so called "crackdowns" against the media are private lawsuits placed against spe-cific media outlets accused of libel. Public servants have been accused of several dif-ferent crimes, including the President that has been accused of "Crimes against hu-manity". I do not support this president, but I would not in my Almodovar dreams ac-cuse him of something so terrible. The journalist was asked to prove this in a court and instead fled to Miami (with hand in the air screaming freedom of speech) where he is now seeking asylum.

    • Oleg

      Well as Stalin once said "it doesn't matter how people vote it's who does the counting", elections and referendums can be rigged, in fact in the former Soviet Union they used to have elections all the time, but with only one party and one name on the ballot. Likewise with Iraq, Saddam Hussein and Kim Jong Ill winning re-election with 98-100% of the vote.

      • Jorge

        With that logic then lets take down all governments. Even the one in your country. Your arguments are riddled with an overwhelming lack of consistency. Come visit our beautiful country, you will get a feeling of the reality.

        PS: but when you come, do learn spanish. if you only speak english you will find that the lower classes will not be able to communicate with you. and then your information will be biased.

  • Jorge

    Somehow your article is a little bit incomplete when you miss to include this small part in your text "Emilio Palacio, in which he called Correa a “dictator” and implied that Correa had ordered the military to fire on the hospital, putting civilians’ lives at risk."

    Also when you say that "Suspiciously, five different judges presided over the case". You fail to mention that the defendants of El Universo where the ones who Recused (literal translation, pardon my legal ignorance) each of these judges basically saying that they where not fit to handle this case. I find it a bit suspicious that you completely missed this information.

    I can understand that most authors that choose to write about Ecuador do not speak Spanish or even know where Ecuador is. But I find it irresponsible that you publish half-truths without flinching even.

  • Steve Chavez

    Since Occupy started the Santa Fe New Mexican and the University of New Mexico Daily Lobo had multiple reports per issue. The Albuquerque Journal had an article when something important was news worthy. The SFNM and DL printed on every act but then dismissed the truth when it became against their mission. There was a death in Albuquerque and the camp was taken over by the homeless and many drunks who camped there for free food.

    The SFNM writes articles on "immigrants" but will remove any comment, or ban comments altogether, if anyone writes "illegals." "Drivers Licenses are being issued to illegals with most giving false ID and documents to attain them." That sentence would be removed. They are "Undocumented immigrants." But a long time poster wrote "Whoever becomes Senator I pray they will work for the destruction of the murderous pig state of Israel." This comment stayed even after numerous complaints but "illegal" is banned?

    This from Henry Lopez of the SFNM:

    "Henry M. Lopez Digital Dev Mgr  3 hours ago in reply to Steven Chavez

    No, nothing was removed and it wasn't due to anything that anyone wrote. The item was mis-tagged in the content-management system. It's not re-tagged and appearing.

    Please, feel free to write a letter to the editor at, which is exactly what we're encouraging folks to do. 

    That's correct, on immigration stories, we're lot leaving those open for instant comments because the tone and tenor of those discussions have just fallen through the floor in recent months and not providing a productive conversation anymore."


  • Ghostwriter

    Well,Jorge. Although we have a First Amendment in this country that basically says that we have a free press,there are many here who feel that the American press haven't been as tough on President Obama as they would have like. There are a number of media outlets that are critical of the President but mostly a lot of them support him.
    It sounds to me as though President Correa is too thin-skinned and doesn't take criticism well. He and those like him (I include Hugo Chavez among them) don't want criticism. They want their press to be lapdogs for them. It sounds like your a supporter of President Correa. Sounds like he doesn't like freedom of the press too much.

    • Jorge

      Dear Ghostwriter,
      I invite you to visit all the major newspaper outlets of Ecuador. I dare you not to find a criticism of the president on the front page of each periodical. Have a look for yourself.

      You people in the US are in the blind, I don't really blame you, but please open your eyes.

      Correa is not striking back on "critisism". He has been falsly accused of a crime, and that in this country is a crime. Like I mention, in this article Jacob somehow fails to say the most important line of what Palacio's sentence is about. He has accused Correa of commiting crimes against humanity. This is not an opinion. Why don't you take Google Translate and go to the source.

      I don't want to defend Correa, I just want you to see both sides of the coin.

      And let me just remind you that in Ecuador we do have freedom of speech. You can say whatever you want. But in this country, each citizen has also the resonsibility of what he/she says.

  • Luke Weyland

    US is trying Bradley Manning for the crime of revealing a US helicopter assault on unarmed civilians.
    US has convicted 5 Cubans for the crime of revealing a planned attack on Cuba.
    US locks up more people then any other nation – both per total incarerated and per capita
    Ortega, Chavez and Correa are not military strongmen they are democratically elected presidents. military strongmen like the Yemeni President and the former Egyptian President tend to be US allies.

    • Ghostwriter

      And Ortega,Chavez and Correa have this nasty habit of locking people up who criticize them. Come on! Who are you trying to fool?

      • Jorge

        Its easy to repeat that rhetoric. Tell the name one person who has been locked up for criticism. I dare you to.

  • WilliamJamesWard

    Drug production and export from South America into Mexico for distribution into
    the United States is the biggest money making problem for all concerned. On top
    of the drug problem Islamists are infesting the drug movement and colonizing in
    all of South America. In short whoever rules will do it under the cloud of drugs and
    Islamists who are recruiting followers into a new cartel that will blow all the others
    away and bring devistation in the end if America decides it has had enough from
    South of the border. The press in South America has become meaningless…….

  • luke Weyland

    Press freedom is thriving in latin America.
    It is threatened by the USA that holds people, like brave, Bradley Manning in solitary confinement for the 'crime' of revealing the genocide perpetrated by US and allied forces in Afghanistan, Pakistan and elsewhere.