The Mullahs’ History of Assassination

Pages: 1 2

The deaths of the Iranian defence scientists have allowed the regime in Tehran to weep copious tears and sputter outrage about the inequity of assassination as a political tool.  One might think the more natural reaction there might be envy.  Assassination has been one of the outreach tools of the ayatollahs and their regime in Iran since the early days of the Revolution. When the Islamic Republic of Iran was established in 1979, it had two strategies to eliminate its opponents.  At home, it killed its internal opponents – killing 7,900 of them in its first five years alone using techniques many totalitarian regimes have employed, such as, mass executions, tortures, disappearances, and “accidents”. Abroad, it used its embassies and cultural offices to host killers and sent them out after prominent critics.  Many of these critics living overseas were Iranian intellectuals and activists who had escaped from Iran after the establishment of the regime.  In addition to employing terror against its own citizens and émigrés, the Iranian government has also claimed victims from other nationalities.  The Islamic Republic of Iran is one of the world’s most significant sponsors of terrorism.  During its 33 years of existence, it has continually instigated violence elsewhere and pursued indirect war through the use of terrorism throughout the Middle East, Africa, and both North and South America.

Although the Islamic Republic of Iran officials claim that terrorism is strange to them, an immense weight of evidence shows that orchestrated terrorism outside Iran is a major factor in practice of the regime.  The first victims of the Iranian government terrorism were Shahriar Shafigh, the Shah of Iran’s nephew who was assassinated in 1979 in Paris and Ali Akbar Tabatabai, the former press attaché of the Iranian embassy in the United States under the Shah of Iran who was assassinated in 1980 in Washington.  The assassination of Ali Akbar Tabatabai was committed by David Belfield or Dawud Salahuddin, an African-American who converted to Islam and after the assassination fled to Iran.  In 2001, Dawud Salahuddin acted as the major character of the movie Kandahar, directed by one of the Iranian regime’s filmmakers Mohsen Makhmalbaf.  After the first assassinations, many other Iranian dissidents were killed in different parts of the world.

Among the dead are, Dr. Shahpour Bakhtiar (the last Prime Minister of the Shah of Iran), Dr. Abdol Rahman Ghassemlou (the Leader of the Kurdistan Democratic Party of Iran), General Gholam Ali Oveisi (Tehran military governor), Fereydoun Farrokhzad (the famous Iranian showman, singer, and poet), and many other.  One of the more notorious attacks by the agents of the Iranian government against its dissidents occurred in Mykonos restaurant in Berlin, Germany in 1992 that caused the murder of Sadegh Sharafkandi (the Secretary General of the Kurdistan Democratic Party of Iran) and his representatives and translator, Fattah Abdoli, Homayoun Ardalan, and Nouri Dehkordi.  In April 10, 1997, the Berlin court announced that this assassination was plotted by Ali Khamenei (Iran Supreme Leader), Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani (Iran former President), and Ali Fallahian (Iran former Minister of Intelligence).  Two of the terrorists were Kazem Darabi, an Iranian who lived in Berlin and Abbas Rhayel, a Lebanese terrorist and a member of the Hezballah organization.  Other Iranian and Lebanese terrorists were able to escape to Iran and Lebanon.

One of the most significant examples of the terrorist activities of the Iranian government against non-Iranians was the truck bombing of the Argentine Israelite Mutual Association in Buenos Aires on July 18, 1994.  The Iranian government directed this terrorist activity through the terrorist group Hezballah.  This was one of the deadliest bombings to have ever occurred in Argentina, killing 85 people and injuring 300.  A major motive behind this atrocity seems to have been the suspension of a nuclear technology transfer agreement between Iran and Argentina.  According to Argentine judge Rodolfo Canicoba Corral, the terrorists who were involved in this act were six Iranians (including Ahmad Reza Asghari, the third Secretary of the Islamic Republic of Iran Embassy in Buenos Aires, who used to work for Iran’s Revolutionary Guard before being posted to Argentina) and one Lebanese man.  Evidence suggests that the terrorist attack was planned in 1993, when Ahmad Reza Asghari attended a meeting with the former President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and his deputies.

Pages: 1 2

  • Guest

    If you live by the sword, you die by the sword.

  • Marty

    A good poinjt. Shouldn't the mullahs be assassinated? They are social parasites who advocate and sponsor murder, pedophilia, terrorism, and genocide. They certainly and richly deserve the death penalty as war criminals for crimes against humanity. Their acolytes are currently busy slaughtering thousands of defenseless civilians in syria. They have funded and trained sociopaths who have killed Americans in iraq. Seizing the American Embassy in 1979 was an act of war against the United States. That makes the mullahs legitimate and very attractive targets for elimination.

  • mrbean

    Dhimmi "Useful Idiots" of Islam don't realize that the Muslims don't want to be tolerant, they don't want allies, they don't want to assimilate, they want to change America to conform to Islam and Sharia law. Useful idiot Dhimmis just want no conflict and the alligator to eat them last. Muck the Fuzzlims! Kill 'em all, wrap 'em in their prayer rugs and put 'em all in piles, burn 'em all using pork grease for a starter, and let Allah sort 'em out. Oh deaaaarrr, I am just sooooo awful aren't I.

  • Ghostwriter

    I agree with just about everything in this article. The Iranian Mullahs deserve whatever bad things that happen to them. They are a group of diseased psychopaths who deserve to be shot.

  • BLJ

    The only good mullah is a dead mullah. I think it would be funny to see them scatter after throwing a can of Right Guard near them.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Athough the Islamic Republic of Iran officials claim that terrorism is strange to them, an immense weight of evidence shows that orchestrated terrorism outside Iran is a major factor in practice of the regime. 

    Uhm…that is because it is strange to them and to all Muslims as a matter of fact, as Muslims never ever perpetrate terrorism since it is an un-Islamic manifestation that is considered to be blasphemous in Islam and therefore punished under the penalty of death.

    However, jihad, on the other hand, which is holy fighting in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme and in which involves both violent and non-violent means is not strange to them as it is an obligatory duty for every Muslim on earth, per the sixth and most important pillar of Islam.

    The first victims of the Iranian government terrorism were Shahriar Shafigh, the Shah of Iran’s nephew who was assassinated in 1979 in Paris and Ali Akbar Tabatabai, the former press attaché of the Iranian embassy in the United States under the Shah of Iran who was assassinated in 1980 in Washington.

    You mean the first victims of Iranian government violent jihad. A jihadist killed fighting in the cause of Allah gets an automatic one-way ticket to Allah's version of carnal paradise. Meanwhile, a Muslim resorting to terrorism, isn't a Muslim but instead a blasphemous apostate that gets a one-way ticket to Allah's version of fiery hell.

    One of the most significant examples of the terrorist activities of the Iranian government against non-Iranians was the truck bombing of the Argentine Israelite Mutual Association in Buenos Aires on July 18, 1994. 

    You really mean one of the most significant examples of the violent jihadist activities of the Iranian government against non-Muslim unbelievers was the truck bombing of the Argentine Israelite Mutual Association in Buenos Aires on July 18, 1994.

    The Iranian government directed this terrorist activity through the terrorist group Hezballah

    The Iranian government directed this violent jihad activity through the jihad group Hezballah

    This was one of the deadliest bombings to have ever occurred in Argentina, killing 85 people and injuring 300.

    This was one of the deadliest bombings to have ever occurred in Argentina, killing 85 Jewish unbelievers and injuring 300.

    According to Argentine judge Rodolfo Canicoba Corral, the terrorists who were involved in this act were six Iranians (including Ahmad Reza Asghari, the third Secretary of the Islamic Republic of Iran Embassy in Buenos Aires, who used to work for Iran’s Revolutionary Guard before being posted to Argentina) and one Lebanese man. 

    According to Argentine judge Rodolfo Canicoba Corral, the jihadists who were involved in this act were six Iranians (including Ahmad Reza Asghari, the third Secretary of the Islamic Republic of Iran Embassy in Buenos Aires, who used to work for Iran’s Revolutionary Guard before being posted to Argentina) and one Lebanese jihadist.

    Evidence suggests that the terrorist attack was planned in 1993, when Ahmad Reza Asghari attended a meeting with the former President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and his deputies.

    Evidence suggests that the violent jihad attack was planned in 1993, when Ahmad Reza Asghari attended a meeting with the former President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and his deputies.

    It's simple really, if the violent act was perpetrated by non-Muslims and if the motivation wasn't in the cause of Allah to make Islam supreme, then it is terrorism.

    On the other hand, if the violent act was perpetrated by Muslims in the cause of Allah to make Islam supreme, then it is jihad.

    Why is it so important to distinguish between jihad and terrorism, because jihad in stark contrast to terrorism, can be non-violent as well as violent. In fact, non-violent jihad relative to violent jihad is employed by the Islamic world against the West astronomically far more prevalently and thus constitutes an exponentially far greater threat to the West.

    However, per the dictates of PC multiculturalism, because jihad always get conflated and morally equated as being terrorism, which as its name implies is always only violent, non-violent jihad, such as mass Muslim immigration to the West for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme, on the other hand, gets totally ignored, which means it is manifesting today throughout the West totally uncontested and unopposed.

    Indeed, if anyone believes that Muslims migrate to the West or anywhere else for that matter to assimilate and integrate, then by all means please cite as many examples of you can where Muslims have readily assimilated and integrated and matriculated into becoming productive and contributing citizens of their newly adoptive countries. Good luck!

    • Western Canadian

      “Uhm…that is because it is strange to them and to all Muslims as a matter of fact, as Muslims never ever perpetrate terrorism since it is an un-Islamic manifestation that is considered to be blasphemous in Islam and therefore punished under the penalty of death.”

      Just in case you haven’t noticed, you are the only one on this website who actually believes that incredible display of ignorance and stupidity. That you insist on repeating it over and over, just proves you are insane.

      ‘I have been made successful through terror’ Mo.

      Who would you believe, this mentaly deficient and defective loon, or mo himself??

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Just in case you haven't noticed, you are the only one on this website who actually believes that incredible display of ignorance and stupidity. That you insist on repeating it over and over, just proves you are insane.

        According to who? An unhinged Muslim apologizing moonbat like you? Yeah right.

        Look if you want to encourage mass Muslim immigration to Canada that is really covert non-violent jihad for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme because you are an unhinged loon, that's fine, but don't try to tell us Americans what to do ignoramus.

        Furthermore, if you don't believe that mass Muslim immigration to the West for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme is covert non-violent jihad and is real, then by all means point to all the countries in the world that have had successful outcomes from mass Muslim immigration as it has been occurring for decades now.

        'I have been made successful through terror' Mo.

        Yeah right…and that is an incompetent English translation you moron. There isn't an Arabic word for terror, since terrorism doesn't exist in the Islamic world. The word should be jihad, which in stark contrast to terror, is both violent and non-violent. In fact, in the original Arabic versions of the Koran, the word is jihad moron.

        • Dunadan

          Um, i speak Arabic and there most definitely IS a word for "terror": "Al rohb", which is also the root word for terrorism, "Al Irhab". You can now go back to being at each-other's throats over semantics, as if it mattered whether Islam calls its bloodthirsty violence "Terror", "Jihad", or "Rumpelstilskin".

        • NorthStar

          You're the only Muslim apologizing moonbat here. Why don't you learn Arabic and read the Koran before spouting off your nonsense. Terrorism is what the Koran is about.

    • Western Canadian

      “However, per the dictates of PC multiculturalism, because jihad always get conflated and morally equated as being terrorism, which as its name implies is always only violent, non-violent jihad, such as mass Muslim immigration to the West for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme, on the other hand, gets totally ignored, which means it is manifesting today throughout the West totally uncontested and unopposed. ”

      As another example of how ignorant you are, due to your living in a fantasy world where you are actually of even average intelligence, this one is outstanding…..

      Anti-jihadis have been drawing attention to, and fighting, stealth jihad for years…. there are even a number of excellent books on the subject.

      You are truly weird.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        As another example of how ignorant you are, due to your living in a fantasy world where you are actually of even average intelligence, this one is outstanding…..

        Anti-jihadis have been drawing attention to, and fighting, stealth jihad for years…. there are even a number of excellent books on the subject.

        You are truly weird.

        Wait a minute, first you claim ad nauseum that it doesn't exist and that I'm the only one that claims it exist, and now you claim that anti-jihadists like me “have been drawing attention to” it for years. Seek mental help for your severe mental issues.

        Yes, certain courageous anti-jihadists like me have been attempting to draw attention to covert non-violent jihad, while being relentlessly attacked by loons like you for years, and until it is finally recognized and accepted by our elites, we will continue relentlessly attempting to draw attention to it while being relentlessly attacked by unhinged loons like yourself.

      • NorthStar

        ObamaYoMoma isn't wierd. He's probably a leftist who's picking fights to undermine the debate.

        Or maybe a Muslim playing his little Fitna games, undermining us so we fight each other.

  • Anamah

    Repugnant evil regime. All those cowards in power in Iran are perverted psychopaths . Each and everyone of them. Sick despicable beasts. I have the sensation they are going to suffer a lethal final experience. Is time!

  • zak

    The article makes some good points. I agree with what the authors have written, and commend them for a job well done. Great examples to reinstate your argument. For anyone to argue, in this day and age that is, that the Islamic Republic of Iran is anything better than what this article portrays is similar to kicking in an open door. Yet, with respect to the remarks made by ObamaYoMoma, The sharp contrast between what the religion preaches and what is in actuality must not be equated, or rather put into the same box. I do not like to assume, but it is readily noticeable that you are leaning towards a phobia of Islam, if you haven't already reached that stage. Even more, a phobia of immigrants or Middle Easterners. For you to conclude that if Muslims do not assimilate with the wider culture they are attempting to take over the region (the West) is beyond absurd. The reason being due to the widely accepted FACT that the majority of immigrants, or Muslims, who immigrated to Canada, the United States or the West in general did not do so for religious reasons, rather for political ends. Now, I am not religious, but to put all your eggs in one basket is self-defeating one's argument. Also, the wider culture has forcefully assimilated the native population of the lands they now occupy. The Aboriginal peoples are the only ones who have legitimate claims on these lands. Middle Easterners and Europeans (majority of Canadians and Americans, etc) are the ones who should assimilate to the culture of the Aboriginals, as it is the true identity of these lands, if we are to take that route. At the same time, I do not want to be here defending Islam or Muslims, but as MLK beautifully put it: "An injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere". I believe such remarks, which are too often made nowadays, can and will provoke clashes, or skirmishes that are irrelevant. I am a Kurd, my nation has suffered enough for centuries. Yet, for me to want my own freedom, I must want the same for my neighbour. For me to paint all Muslims with the same brush would be similar to blaming all Iranians for the crimes carried out by the Islamic Republic of Iran, or for Iranians to blame all Americans or Westerners for the crimes carried out against them by the West. For we must not forget it was the West who brought this regime into power. I do not want to confuse anyone… In sum, we are in a day and age where such remarks, as those mentioned by my counterpart ObamaYoMoma, would not be mentioned by children, let alone for us to bring them forth. You are doing the same thing as the totalitarian regime in Iran is doing, which is contextualizing what Islam preaches, into something totality different and utilizing it for your own ends. Islam does not promote hate speech, nor does it tell these terrorists to go out and kill innocent civilians or even the guilty. Again, I must emphasize that I am not a follower. Yet, the religion states that God is the ultimate judge and to kill one human being is similar to killing all of humankind (to be politically correct). Even more, the actual definition of Jihad is a battle or struggle within. It involves making yourself a better person for religious reasons. This religion has become a tool for both extremists like the Islamic Republic of Iran and its opponents alike- both failing tragically to portray the religion as it should be. Similar to how many, if not all of the other monotheist religions, including Christianity, Judaism and so forth have been utilized for political and other ends. It is tragic to see how ignorant the masses are today. As a race, we fought for the establishment of the Universal Declaration upon Human Rights, amongst other such declarations, accords, etc., to have such accomplishments diminished by the redundant usage of religion to divide people instead of bringing them together… The actions taken out by this regime have no attachment to the religion or the people. In all honesty, I am really saddened by such thoughts. But, at the end of the day, I am Kurd, and I like to learn, to prosper and I am hopeful for a prosperous and united Kurdistan. I hope I did not offend anyone by my remarks- that is my disclaimer… Her bji Kurdo Kurdistan (Long live Kurds and Kurdistan). Yan Kurdistan, Yan Naman (Either Kurdistan or no existence)…

    • ObamaYoMoma

      For you to conclude that if Muslims do not assimilate with the wider culture they are attempting to take over the region (the West) is beyond absurd.

      Uhm…paragraphs are your friend dude. What is absurd is that someone is this day and age can still be as dumb as you are when it comes to Islam. Hell, no wonder you are so dumb about Islam, you don't even know how to use paragraphs.

      Now, I am not religious, but to put all your eggs in one basket is self-defeating one's argument.

      First of all moonbat, I hate to be the first one to inform you, but Islam is not a religion. It is a supremacist theo-political totalitarian ideology that masquerades as being a religion to dupe the gullible societies it intends to subjugate into a very draconian form of Islamic totalitarianism via imposition of Islamic Law (Sharia) for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme.

      Indeed, look inside every Islamic country in the world today and what do you see? You see nothing but totalitarianism and you also see that all Christians and other non-Muslim unbelievers living inside those Islamic totalitarian hellholes as less than second-class dhimmi citizens being violently oppressed and systematically persecuted when not outright slaughtered altogether.

      Why don't you remove your PC multicultural fairy tale glasses for once and take a look at the real world. Indeed, how narrow-minded, myopic, and ignorant can you be?

      Also, the wider culture has forcefully assimilated the native population of the lands they now occupy. The Aboriginal peoples are the only ones who have legitimate claims on these lands. Middle Easterners and Europeans (majority of Canadians and Americans, etc) are the ones who should assimilate to the culture of the Aboriginals, as it is the true identity of these lands,

      Seek mental help for your severe mental issues you flake.

      For me to paint all Muslims with the same brush would be similar to blaming all Iranians for the crimes carried out by the Islamic Republic of Iran, or for Iranians to blame all Americans or Westerners for the crimes carried out against them by the West.

      Uhm…the sixth and most important pillar of Islam makes it an obligatory duty in Islam for every Muslim on earth to fight jihad in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme. Indeed, the sixth and most important pillar of Islam doesn't make it an obligatory duty only for so-called radicals to fight jihad, and the sixth and most important pillar of Islam doesn't make it an obligatory duty only for so-called extremists to fight jihad, and the sixth and most important pillar of Islam doesn't make it an obligatory duty only for so-called Islamists to fight jihad, while at the same time giving a free pass and exemption to so-called moderates to fight jihad in the cause of Allah. Instead, the sixth and most important pillar of Islam makes it an obligatory duty for ALL MUSLIMS ON EARTH to fight jihad against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme. No Exceptions!

      Therefore, per the dictates of Islam, ALL MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS ON EARTH are jihadists. A tiny minority of them are violent jihadists, while the vast overwhelming majority of them are covert non-violent jihadists, and the few of them that are not jihadists are not Muslims at all, but blasphemous apostates instead that per the dictates of MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX ISLAM must be executed.

      For we must not forget it was the West who brought this regime into power

      You are a self hating loon too. Hence, also don't forget to mention that to the psychologist as well.

      In sum, we are in a day and age where such remarks, as those mentioned by my counterpart ObamaYoMoma, would not be mentioned by children, let alone for us to bring them forth.

      That's hilarious…you are one severely unhinged moonbat!

      –continued below

    • ObamaYoMoma

      You are doing the same thing as the totalitarian regime in Iran is doing, which is contextualizing what Islam preaches, into something totality different and utilizing it for your own ends.

      Really…can you demonstrate that? Please excuse me if I won't hold my breath.

      So, according to you the Ayatollahs of Iran together with all the most respected authorities in both Shi'a and Sunni Islam including Al Azhar university in Cairo Egypt and all major schools of Islamic jurisprudence in both Shi'a and Sunni Islam are contextualizing, instead of interpreting the Koran, the Hadith, and the Sira as it always has been strictly interpreted in only its most literal sense since Islam first came into existence almost 1400 years ago and despite its long history of Islamic conquest, subjugation of non-Muslims, and cultural genocide, and on what or whose authority did you acquire such ridiculous and absurd information from?

      Islam does not promote hate speech, nor does it tell these terrorists to go out and kill innocent civilians or even the guilty.

      Really? Have you not been paying attention to the non-stop constant drumbeat of hate speech and incitement to violence that constantly is emanating from the Islamic world against non-Muslim unbelievers?

      Per the dictates of Islam, Muslims are required to maintain nothing but enmity in their hearts for non-Muslim unbelievers, which is impossible to do unless there is a constant drumbeat of hate speech and incitement to violence maintained incessantly against non-Muslim unbelievers. Indeed, mentally handicapped and delusional leftists like you notice this constant and incessant drumbeat of hate speech and incitement to violence constantly emanating from the Islamic world and then stupidly blame either Israel or America for it, when it is a normal manifestation of Islam.

      Yet, the religion states that God is the ultimate judge and to kill one human being is similar to killing all of humankind (to be politically correct).

      What religion? Islam is not even a religion. It may have originally started out as a poor attempt at being a religion, but subsequent to the Hijra, Islam was morphed into something else entirely different from religion altogether, i.e., a supremacist theo-political totalitarian ideology with the main goal of subjugating the entire the world under the suzerainty of Islam.

      In addition, all the peaceful verses of the Koran that originate from the time when Islam was still trying to be a peaceful religion have all been abrogated, i.e., superseded and replaced, by the latter issued verses of the Koran that were issued shortly before Muhammad died and that obligate ALL MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS to fight jihad in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme.

      Even more, the actual definition of Jihad is a battle or struggle within. It involves making yourself a better person for religious reasons

      Go fly a kite you useful idiot loon or incompetent taqiyya spewing Muslim.

      It is tragic to see how ignorant the masses are today.

      You being one of the most naïve, gullible, and ignorant of those masses. But, of course, if you are a Muslim Kurd, you are one of the most incompetent taqiyya artists in the Islamic community.

      As a race, we fought for the establishment of the Universal Declaration upon Human Rights, amongst other such declarations, accords, etc., to have such accomplishments diminished by the redundant usage of religion to divide people instead of bringing them together..

      Excuse me, but the Islamic world didn't sign the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Instead, they signed the competing Cairo Universal Declaration on Human Rights in Islam you moonbat, which bows to Sharia on all matter of human rights. Thus, all Christians and other non-Muslim unbelievers living in the totalitarian Islamic hellholes as less than second-class dhimmi citizens today are violently oppressed and systematically persecuted when not outright slaughtered altogether.

  • Zak

    Universal Declaration of Human Rights* (wrote Universal Declaration upon Human Rights- it was in the context…Minor correction-Plus it is 2am so yeah..)

  • Zak

    “Uhm…paragraphs (capital on Paragraphs) are your friend dude. What is absurd is that someone is (“in” is the word you are looking for “dude”) this day and age can still be…”

    Paragraphs are my friend? You crack me up… This is a severe case of the pot calling the kettle black. I concede to your point, with respect to paragraphs, but in my defense it was 2am and I simply just wrote in the dialogue box. Yet, you are telling me about my punctuation, when in fact you, yourself lack in that field as well. Case in point: (see above). Also, instead of rebutting my arguments in a rational and intellectual manner, you attack my character and slander me. You do not know me, nor do I know you. For you to jump to conclusions and attack my character and person instead of my argument(s) shows your true colours. As I will display further on in the response. Further, on such a forum, punctuality is not the end goal-the argument is. I am not speaking gibberish to you, you understand and comprehend what I am saying. Thus, contend what I say, now how it is put in front of you, i.e., criticizing my paragraph structure, etc.

    Even more, you criticize my knowledge of the religion; yet, you are making remarks without having any scholarly evidence to back up your claims. I, on the hand am more than happy to provide you with source after source to reinforce whatever I say. Scholarly and unbiased sources that is, Wikipedia does not count bud. Oh, and don’t forget Fox News either ☺.

    “First of all moonbat, I hate to be the first one to inform you, but Islam is not a religion. It is a supremacist theo-political totalitarian ideology that masquerades as being a religion to dupe the gullible societies it intends to subjugate into a very draconian form of Islamic totalitarianism via imposition of Islamic Law (Sharia) for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme.”

    You call me a moonbat? Are you kidding me? Yeah, I am progressive. I want change. If not for progressives, our legal system would be in shambles, let alone non-existent, the class system would still exist (Aristocracy, nobals, etc…)and we would be moving backwards through time instead of forwards. We would still believe that the world is Euro-centric or Ceno-centric… It seems you still do, either way… It is because of conservative, right wing agendas that we are in this mess in the first place. Starting from the situation of the Kurds, to the political, social and economic downs historically and contemporarily.

    “ … I hate to be the first one to inform you, but Islam is not a religion. It is a supremacist theo-political totalitarian ideology that masquerades as being a religion to dupe the gullible societies it intends to subjugate into a very draconian form of Islamic totalitarianism via imposition of Islamic Law (Sharia) for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme.”

    ^ Did you just say that? Not a religion? Give me a moment to laugh… So what you are telling me is that a faith that nearly a quarter of the globe’s population follows, one that is accepted as a RELIGION not only by its proponents (needless to say), but also by its opponents (i.e. Christians, Jews and so on) as a religion, is not a religion? Also, if what you preach is correct (hypothetical) then the utilization of the Judo-Christian faiths go in the same boat. The Vatican, amongst states, has utilized religion to control the masses. This is both prevalent historically and contemporarily. Also, what would you say with respect to missionary’s? You would know if you have read European history, let alone any other history…

    Do not forget to cite your source(s). Again, remember, Fox News and Wikipedia and .com sites, etc., are not credible sources… How old are you? 10? Do you even hold a degree of any kind? Have you ever finished a book?

  • Zak

    “Indeed, look inside every Islamic country in the world today and what do you see? You see nothing but totalitarianism and you also see that all Christians and other non-Muslim unbelievers living inside those Islamic totalitarian hellholes as less than second-class dhimmi citizens being violently oppressed and systematically persecuted when not outright slaughtered altogether.”

    I do not disagree full-heartedly with the fact that most “Islamic” countries of the world today are ruled by such regimes. Yet, their rule is not legitimate. In that they are not recognized by the masses. Their power was consolidated with the help of the West. Iran’s resources were taken for barely a profit by Western states in return for aid to that country (consolidating their power). Egypt similarly, has had its oil and natural recourses pawned by Israel in return for its security- So that Israel does not attack it. At the same time, Mubarak’s reign was reinforced. Another example, of the many is Saudi Arabia, which has been coined in academia as a rentier-state. Power is consolidated through the cooptation of natural resources by Western states. Hence, the reason behind the Arab spring, as it has been termed. People do not agree with those in power. Those in power (the minority) do not represent the views and perspectives of those being ruled (the majority). Yet, the world still see’s them as the same. So would it be fair for me to put Christian Arabs, Kurds and so on in the same boat as these Jihadists you speak of? I mean, that is essentially what your argument puts forth.

    If you want proof for anything that I say, I have sources to reinforce my arguments. Yet, you must present arguments in a rational and well-mannered fashion. Not irrationally and ill mannered. That will never gain you any points with opponents. I am here to educate myself not to become dumber. Instead teaching me something, and everyone else for that matter, your remarks have made us that much more ignorant than we were…

    “Why don't you remove your PC multicultural fairy tale glasses for once and take a look at the real world. Indeed, how narrow-minded, myopic, and ignorant can you be? “

    My PC multicultural fairy tale glasses… I am narrow-minded, myopic, and ignorant? So you are racist the more? You are here preaching that if I am not with you, I must be against you? It seems like you are the one who needs a reality check bud. Racism, Euro-centrism and backward ideologies are being trampled by progressive, forward-thinking personalities today. Wake up. Racism will get you nowhere. Don’t preach you racist, idle conservative agenda here. This is not the place for such dogmatic speeches. Such remarks are irrelevant here. Go to the Mullahs and preach it to them. They will surely buy it.

    “Seek mental help for your severe mental issues you flake.” In response to my statement: “Also, the wider culture has forcefully assimilated the native population of the lands they now occupy. The Aboriginal peoples are the only ones who have legitimate claims on these lands. Middle Easterners and Europeans (majority of Canadians and Americans, etc) are the ones, who should assimilate to the culture of the Aboriginals, as it is the true identity of these lands”

    I should seek mental help for my severe mental issues? Why you getting personal again? Also, why did you totally ignore my point? Too incompetent to concede to it, or just avoiding it, as you have nothing to say in response, than “seek mental help for your severe mental issues you flake”? You are pretending to have a debate with me, yet you attack me like a ten year old who did not get his way, so he gets personal. Grow up and accept the facts. Either concede to a point or shut your trap.

  • Zak

    “Uhm…the sixth and most important pillar of Islam makes it an obligatory duty in Islam for every Muslim on earth to fight jihad in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme. Indeed, the sixth and most important pillar of Islam doesn't make it an obligatory duty only for so-called radicals to fight jihad, and the sixth and most important pillar of Islam doesn't make it an obligatory duty only for so-called extremists to fight jihad, and the sixth and most important pillar of Islam doesn't make it an obligatory duty only for so-called Islamists to fight jihad, while at the same time giving a free pass and exemption to so-called moderates to fight jihad in the cause of Allah. Instead, the sixth and most important pillar of Islam makes it an obligatory duty for ALL MUSLIMS ON EARTH to fight jihad against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme. No Exceptions!”

    “Therefore, per the dictates of Islam, ALL MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS ON EARTH are jihadists. A tiny minority of them are violent jihadists, while the vast overwhelming majority of them are covert non-violent jihadists, and the few of them that are not jihadists are not Muslims at all, but blasphemous apostates instead that per the dictates of MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX ISLAM must be executed.”

    The sixth pillar of Islam? Are you kidding me? The religion was set in stone over 1400 years ago, and you saying now that there is a sixth pillar? Whoever preached this garbage to you is dumber than you first and foremost. Second, the main sects, if not all of them (as I haven’t seen all their perspectives) reject any such pillar. WOW! “Sixth and most important pillar”? It is non-existent, as it is not recognized. You have bought in to the propaganda promoted by Islamic Extremists (i.e. the Taliban, Al-qaeda, etc) utilizing the religion for their own ends. You do know that the Taliban for example has created its own version of the Koran/Quran? Again, you put all your eggs in one basket. Hopeless, simply hopeless. What you just stated, is a loud of bull. Retarded conservative buffoon- how does it feel to be attacked personally? I have come down to your level- just to prove a point.

    “You are a self hating loon too. Hence, also don't forget to mention that to the psychologist as well.”- In response to my statement: “For we must not forget it was the West who brought this regime into power.”

    I am a self hating loon? How am I a self hating loon? Why, did you shock you with the news that your forefathers put my country into jeopardy and natural resources. Or the fact that millions of my people have been victims of genocide, mass execution, etc., because of your country, or rather government. I can go on for days. Yet, when you cannot rebuttal an argument you curse at me. Why is that? Are you angered that you cannot say anything in response? Or are you just plain stupid? Which one is it? Ill go with both.

    “That's hilarious…you are one severely unhinged moonbat!” In response to: “In sum, we are in a day and age where such remarks, as those mentioned by my counterpart ObamaYoMoma, would not be mentioned by children, let alone for us to bring them forth.”

    What is truly hilarious is the bemoaned fact of your intellect. You curse at me like a little baby when you have nothing better to say. Go read a book man, you might learn something and be able to come to grips with reality.

    “Really…can you demonstrate that? Please excuse me if I won't hold my breath.”

    Yeah, I already have, above and below. Don’t choke.

    “So, according to you the Ayatollahs of Iran together with all the most respected authorities in both Shi'a and Sunni Islam including Al Azhar university in Cairo Egypt and all major schools of Islamic jurisprudence in both Shi'a and Sunni Islam are contextualizing, instead of interpreting the Koran, the Hadith, and the Sira as it always has been strictly interpreted in only its most literal sense since Islam first came into existence almost 1400 years ago and despite its long history of Islamic conquest, subjugation of non-Muslims, and cultural genocide, and on what or whose authority did you acquire such ridiculous and absurd information from? “

    No! Next to watching Fox News and getting your daily dose from there, you are referencing what you are debating against. That defeats your argument smarty. You are here telling me that the Ayatollahs of Iran, et,. Al. are to not be trusted, they are a threat and so on, yet you hold them to their credibility? News flash, the Ayatollahs are not held in high regard by the majority of those in Iran, let alone the free world. Even more, the main sects are against the adaptation of the sixth pillar. It is not widely accepted. I got my information from Fox News. WOW! My information comes from scholastic sources. Not Wikipedia (although, it agrees too), or Fox News. It comes from the source. Your statement is counter-productive, like your argument.

  • Zak

    “Really? Have you not been paying attention to the non-stop constant drumbeat of hate speech and incitement to violence that constantly is emanating from the Islamic world against non-Muslim unbelievers?”

    Who? From where? The Taliban? Al-Qaeda? From where? Such terrorist organizations are not recognized in the Muslim world… If you going to quote them then please spare me…

    “Per the dictates of Islam, Muslims are required to maintain nothing but enmity in their hearts for non-Muslim unbelievers, which is impossible to do unless there is a constant drumbeat of hate speech and incitement to violence maintained incessantly against non-Muslim unbelievers. Indeed, mentally handicapped and delusional leftists like you notice this constant and incessant drumbeat of hate speech and incitement to violence constantly emanating from the Islamic world and then stupidly blame either Israel or America for it, when it is a normal manifestation of Islam.”

    Are you serious? Islam says that? Give me a quote in the Koran/Quran that states such BS. See how you word something completely different to fit your backward conservative ideology. Mentally handicapped? Delusional? I blame others for it? Israel? Who is talking about Israel? That is a totally different discussion; don’t bring something totally different into it. Evidence is clear as to how we reached today. I have proved my point with respect to the West’s connection with the issues revolving the Middle East, etc.

    “What religion? Islam is not even a religion. It may have originally started out as a poor attempt at being a religion, but subsequent to the Hijra, Islam was morphed into something else entirely different from religion altogether, i.e., a supremacist theo-political totalitarian ideology with the main goal of subjugating the entire the world under the suzerainty of Islam.”

    Haha, I am dying of laughter. I have already put this argument into the garbage. No need to waste more time on this childish remark.

    “In addition, all the peaceful verses of the Koran that originate from the time when Islam was still trying to be a peaceful religion have all been abrogated, i.e., superseded and replaced, by the latter issued verses of the Koran that were issued shortly before Muhammad died and that obligate ALL MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS to fight jihad in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme.”

    Agreeable to an extent. It has been changed to promote state agenda’s (i.e. the Islamic Republic of Iran, etc.). Yet, your latter statement is loaded with inconsistencies that I have already rebutted…

    Go fly a kite you useful idiot loon or incompetent taqiyya spewing Muslim.

    See, there you go again. First, your sentence is fragmented- idiot and loon mean the same thing numbskull. Second, I have already iterated to you that I am not some brainwashed fool like yourself. I don’t allow for the Pope or Sheikh to brainwash me into believing some made up BS to promote their own agenda’s. We can see clearly that you are on that bandwagon. Knowing what I am talking about does not make me as such. Although, that is one tactic debaters use in instances when they are not able to rebuttal what has been thrown at them. That tactic being painting their opponent with the same brush as what they are arguing about. To not confuse you, you are painting me with the same brush as Muslims and so forth to fit your argument. Rather, to reinforce it. If it helps you sleep at night, you can believe I am the tooth fairy for all I care.

  • Zak

    “You being one of the most naïve, gullible, and ignorant of those masses. But, of course, if you are a Muslim Kurd, you are one of the most incompetent taqiyya artists in the Islamic community.”

    Oh dear, this is truly a case of the pot calling the kettle black. A Muslim Kurd? I am a Kurd, indeed. Say it again, I love reading it. If you got a problem with me being a Kurd say so. I would love to discuss that too. Ill put you in your place in that debate the same as now. But, by no means call me a Muslim. If being Kurdish was a religion, I would be the first on that bandwagon. I am a human. I fight for what is right. I don’t cower in the face of any injustice. That is what it means to be a Kurd. My nation still is millions strong. Through genocide, mass executions, assimilations and other atrocities we still stand stronger than any nationality on the face of this earth. I will put my life on the line for that statement. I take the greatest of pride in being Kurdish. Say it again and again. You sit here calling me such a name (Muslim) because you cannot argue against me. So you decide to paint me with that brush.

    Excuse me, but the Islamic world didn't sign the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Instead, they signed the competing Cairo Universal Declaration on Human Rights in Islam you moonbat, which bows to Sharia on all matter of human rights. Thus, all Christians and other non-Muslim unbelievers living in the totalitarian Islamic hellholes as less than second-class dhimmi citizens today are violently oppressed and systematically persecuted when not outright slaughtered altogether.

    Goodness, you are really stupid. Those countries didn’t sign? Afghanistan, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon and the list of MUSLIM countries that have signed and adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights goes on, you retard. Although, I agree that those are hellholes, as not only the majority is not cared to, the minority is in the same boat. But, that is not news.

    On another note, you are truly retarded. Make legitimate claims numbskull. I got dumber reading your response instead of learning something. I responded to you initially thinking you were an intellectual, that I could inform you of the actual situation, or you could teach me something. Yet, I see that this was a complete and utter waste of time on my part. Also, it seems you are not even pro-Kurdish. Rather, you are here promoting your conservative, right wing ideology. FYI, this is not the place for it. What do you have to say about the Kurds? Are they trying to take over the world too? Or rather, anyone who disagrees with you is trying to over run you? Nonetheless, I cannot change backwardness, nor can I open you eyes. Thus, I want to conclude with by saying that Aristophanes once wrote that ignorance can be educated, drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever. And you my “friend” are the prime definition of stupidity.

  • Lkay

    May I suggest the following booK;

    How Early Muslim Scholars Assimilated Aristotle and Made Iran the Intellectual Center of the Islamic World: A Study of Falsafah

    Author: Farshad Sadri