Another Obama Power Grab

Pages: 1 2

In short, with its executive order in hand, the anti-fossil fuel Obama administration will have unfettered powers to manage “all forms of energy,” including its “production, conservation, use, control, and distribution.” Energy Secretary Steven Chu will be able to direct the allocation of private resources to the Obama administration’s green energy projects and clamp down further on fossil fuel production without having to worry about Congress getting in the way.

Chu can decide, for example, that the current level of carbon fuel production and usage in this country is creating a risk of global climate change, resulting severe storm damage that could conceivably imperil our national defense. He has the authority to make such a determination and issue regulations on his own initiative under the executive order. Forget about the Environmental Protection Agency.  The Obama administration has found a better shortcut to impose cap and trade type restrictions through “allocation” of “energy resources” so long as the Energy Secretary determines in writing that it is an “appropriate” means to “promote “national defense” (which, don’t forget, includes “energy production” as part of its definition).

The executive order grants to the president’s executive branch agency heads the authority to manage much of the rest of the economy as well, if deemed “appropriate” to “promote” national defense under programs approved by the secretary of defense, secretary of energy or secretary of homeland security. This includes health care (or, as the executive order refers to it, “health resources”). The term “health resources,” by the way, means “drugs, biological products, medical devices, materials, facilities, health supplies, services and equipment required to diagnose, mitigate or prevent the impairment of, improve, treat, cure, or restore the physical or mental health conditions of the population.”

Thus, Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius will have even more power than Obamacare provides her to prioritize and allocate all the nation’s “health resources” as she sees fit, including under “non-emergency conditions,” as long as it can be justified as “appropriate” to “promote” the broadly defined “national defense.”

In addition to citing the Defense Production Act, the Obama administration also bases its far-reaching grab for power over the American economy on the president’s constitutional powers as commander-in-chief. The problem for Obama is that another Democratic president, Harry Truman, tried such an assertion of power during wartime and was slapped down by the Supreme Court. In a 1952 case, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952) – decided two years after the original Defense Production Act and while the Korean War was still underway – the Supreme Court held that the president did not have inherent constitutional powers to direct the secretary of commerce to take possession of and operate most of the nation’s steel mills. “The order cannot properly be sustained as an exercise of the President’s military power as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces,” the Supreme Court concluded.

President Obama has once again grossly overstepped the bounds of his authority. While not yet posing a threat of all-out martial law, as some have suggested, Obama’s latest executive order represents another blatant move of his toward centralized government control of the American economy.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Pages: 1 2

  • Anamah

    What do you think is the goal? I ask of all you! Also to you David, where are you, and what is going on in this country? I find very disturbing every thing this man does. Where are the Congress people, the honest, the patriots, where are our experts… What is happening here. Why is everybody silent? Are we going to became a tyranny? Do I put off the lights… and simply leave?

    • Ken

      Obama wants a "benevolent dictatorship". Watch out America, your freedom just took another big hit!!

      • Roger


    • Cuban Refugee

      Anamah: The goal should be obvious by now: state communism on a global scale. Why is everybody silent? Because they are ruled by fear, or struck mute by the weight of the many coins in their pockets. Are we going to become a tyranny? We entered tyranny when our sovereignty was sold out years ago; Obama is simply "the closer" in the end game. The lights are becoming dim in the entire world; and, there is nowhere to go.

  • Gunner57

    Why do we have this new executive order? In effect, this new EO allows the federal government, directed by the President, to commandeer and control all aspects of the economy and the lives of all Americans. It centralizes control to an astonishing and frightening degree. If Bill Clinton or QWB or for that matter if Jimmy Carter were president, I still wouldn't like it, but with this guy, it scares me. Beware. Be on guard. Throw this bum out in November.

    • JoJoJams

      If we even can, by November……

      • ymarsakar

        The Left used 10 decades to bring their Totalitarian Regime into fruition, in the land known as America's Utopia.

        One election is not going to stop them, whatever comes.

  • Anthony

    It’s a conspiracy! Let’s see, Oh, verbatim from Executive Order #12919 written June 6, 1994? Almost identical language was originally part of The Defense Production Act of 1950? Oh, never mind! Fear mongers don't mention the fact that this order has been passed by every president since then.
    Fear mongers don't mention the fact that this order has been passed by every president since then.

    • Phillip Ley

      And it was wrong, by every President since 1950, if that is indeed the case. No matter who gave the order.

    • Joseph Klein

      From the 1994 Order – Sec. 203. Maximizing Domestic Energy Supplies. The
      authority of the President to perform the functions provided
      by subsection 101(c) of the Act is delegated to the Secretary
      of Commerce, who shall redelegate to the Secretary of Energy
      the authority to make the findings described in subsection
      101(c)(2)(A) that the materials (including equipment), services,
      and facilities are critical and essential.

      Where does the "critical and essential" language appear in Obama's new Executive Order? It doesn't, so far as I can tell. If it does, please link to it.

      • Joseph Klein

        Correction – The "critical and essential' language is buried in Obama's Executive Order but the Obama power grab in today's climate of other Obama power grabs is clear.

    • Bert

      What is dramatically different now is Obama himself. This man with an agenda that combines the radical leftist ideology of Saul Alinsky combined with Islamic supremicism plus hostility toward America and its allies.
      Unfortunately you can still fool some of the people all the time and the Obama fanatics will stick with him to the bitter end.

    • Texas Mom

      Anthony, we never had a Marxist radical as President before. Know what, Americans are stupid and deserve this monster if we let this go unchallenged.

    • ymarsakar

      Fast and Furious was under Bush as well. It was just a surveillance program until evil Totalitarian bureaucrats got a hold of it. Then it started getting really "good". But logic was never a thing designed to be given to the Left's cannon fodder. They are designed to overwhelm the defenders of Light, not to live on the ambrosia harvested from the corpses of the slain later at the victory party.

  • oldtimer

    And which president signed this order….. No other than William Clinton, Democratic socialist..

  • Mach1Duck

    Get out and vote, so we can get a congress that will stop this madness in its tracks.

    • jaydee007

      That's a Great Idea;
      But who do we vote for who's going to do that?
      Enabling Democrats?
      Spineless Republicans?

      • Roger

        Tea party challengers to both.

    • fiddler

      And get ready for shenanigans from unions, and other leftists "inventing" voters. Look how Wisconsin got enough signatures to put recalling Scott Walker on the ballot.

  • SoCalMike

    We are supposed to believe Obama cares about National Defense.
    That's why he's in bed with the MB and has empowered them at every step.
    He despises the US Military and has done everything in his power to gut them and diminish their ability to project force.
    And of course he cares so much about the economy. That's why he positions the government to "manage" as many sectors and aspects of it as he can conceive.
    This facilitates the PLUNDER at the heart of his economic vision.
    This arrogant boy with big ears has never produced a dime of wealth in his life nor run a lemonade stand much less a 7/11 or super market. Yet he and his statist coreligionists assure us they know what they are doing when at this point, it's clear to any freshman econ student they haven't the slightest clue.
    When he opens his lying semi-literate mouth at this point, I just puke!
    And those of you who still applaud and insist on praising him at this point are simply government-worshiping cultists.

    • Rifleman

      Unfortunately, his idea of national defense is to subjugate and fundamentally change the American people.

    • eric

      So what if Obama is a muslim from indonesia , went to college at our expense . At least he has a good education in the most important field of all , { constitutional law } . I think he is way out and far the best president we have had since mabey John Kennedy or Harry Truman . I don't care if he is not even a American citizen and has only a false birth certificate . He at least tries to help the poor .. The fact that Obama can get by with keeping all his information secret , should tell you all you need to know about the kind of country you live in . And just who all these important consitutional laws have been for , all these many yrs . Its time you right wing ding bats shutup and adsjust like us poor people have all these many yrs .

  • pierce

    It is funny. BO used to stand for Body Odor, now it stands for Barack Obama. Is this just coincidence?

    • Cuban Refugee

      They are synonymous … and the stench has permeated our entire country.

  • Rifleman

    If one remembers, this was their basic response to 9/11. Right off, they spoke of using the kind of control, mobilization, and national effort we used to fight WWII, not to go after terrorists, but to “…wean us of our addiction to oil,” and our, ”consumption based economy.” They were drooling over wartime government control over resources and the economy, without ‘wasting’ it on weapons production or sustained large scale military operations. That’s basically what the hussein administration has been doing, to the extent it could, since it began its’ occupation of the WH.

    The only real question left for me is whether the next GOP president defends this expansion of executive powers or rolls it back.

  • jklein6234

    Defense Production Act: the president's authority "may not be used to require priority performance of contracts or orders, or to control the distribution of any supplies of materials, services, and facilities in the marketplace, unless the President finds that—

    (A) such materials, services, and facilities are scarce, critical, and essential—
    (i) to maintain or expand exploration, production, refining, transportation;
    (ii) to conserve energy supplies; or
    (iii) to construct or maintain energy facilities; and

    (B) maintenance or expansion of exploration, production, refining, transportation, or conservation of energy supplies or the construction and maintenance of energy facilities cannot reasonably be accomplished without exercising the authority specified in paragraph (1) of this subsection."

    Clinton's 1994 Executive Order:

    "Sec. 203. Maximizing Domestic Energy Supplies. The
    authority of the President to perform the functions provided
    by subsection 101(c) of the Act is delegated to the Secretary
    of Commerce, who shall redelegate to the Secretary of Energy
    the authority to make the findings described in subsection
    101(c)(2)(A) that the materials (including equipment), services,
    and facilities are critical and essential. The Secretary of
    Commerce shall make the finding described in subsection
    101(c)(2)(A) of the Act that the materials (including equipment),
    services, or facilities are scarce, and the finding described in
    subsection 101(c)(2)(B) that it is necessary to use the authority
    provided by subsection 101(c)(1)."

    Obama's Executive Order:

    "Sec. 203. Maximizing Domestic Energy Supplies. The authorities of the President under section 101(c)(1) (2) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071(c)(1) (2), are delegated to the Secretary of Commerce, with the exception that the authority to make findings that materials (including equipment), services, and facilities are critical and essential, as described in section 101(c)(2)(A) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071(c)(2)(A), is delegated to the Secretary of Energy."

    That's hardly verbatim – some key findings required by the statute and cited in Clinton's order are deliberately left out of Obama's order such as the finding of scarcity and that it is necessary to use the authority provided by subsection 101(c)(1) of the Defense Production Act

    • Stephen_Brady

      Excellent post!

  • Stephen_Brady

    Why can I only find stories like this on the internet? What has happened to our news media (even though I know the answer … They're in bed with Obama)? I find this story here. At Breitbart, I find a story about how Eric Holder … the current AG … told an audience in 1995 that he was in favor of brainwashing the American people, just as they did with tobacco (they provided the video).

    I don't even trust FOX, anymore …

    When the news media becomes compliant with the government, we cannot expect to hear the truth. Keep your powder dry …

    • ymarsakar

      Now a days we use explosives and nukes. Which may be what it comes to, in the end.

  • maria

    Some time ago I came accross Muslims cite and one of comment was " Thank you Barak for doing a good job for us". He continue doing that job.
    If November will not change situataion…

    • aspacia

      maria, it is site. Cite means citation.

  • dray

    democrates go pitching tents and republicans blog huh .remember that when rome became an empire it was agreat general that took that power and his family became emperors for several generations after the civil war to free the people of tyranny is histiry repeating its self,if so you are saying obama is a great man of power.may be his great nephew will call himself nero and burn some jews and christians at the stake.paranoia creates these scenarios.becareful of hatemongering on both sides america can not be divided or we all suffer.

  • alexander

    can we make plastics out of wind or sunlight?
    Oil is the answer.
    Ops, missed that, FuBar Ack O.?
    And "dirty coal" feeds that electric outlet on the wall…..Really!
    Didn't know that either?

  • Jim_C

    Yes, Obama's "tyranny" is "breathtaking," isn't it? This oppression is killing me over here! Why, I certainly hope whomever Obama's opponent may be brings up all his "abuses" on the campaign trail.

    Taste test: get yourself a whole bunch of executive orders from the last 50 years. Mix them up. See if you can separate out the "good" Republican ones from the "bad" Democrat ones.

    • Joseph Klein

      Rather than "mix them up," how about reading the orders side by side and comparing them? Here are a few to get started. Clinton's and Obama's orders are very similar but, as I pointed out above, Obama's order leaves out some crucial limitatoins on his power that were in the Clinton order.

      The Reagan and Nixon orders are nowhere close to the Obama order.

      Executive Order — National Defense Resources Preparedness March 2012 Barack Obama


      Executive Order 12656–Assignment of emergency preparedness responsibilities November 1988 Ronald Reagan

      Executive Order 11490 – Assigning Emergency Preparedness Functions to Federal Departments and Agencies Oct 1969 Richard Nixon

    • ymarsakar

      Fast and Furious under Bush

      Fast and Furious under Obama

      Yeah, they were pretty much the same. Obama killed people to make confiscating guns from Americans legal. Bush was spying on drug lords in Mexico.

      Yeah they were pretty much the same, right.

    • Stephen_Brady

      Simple …

      The good ones are those that do away with all the DEM excecutive orders.

  • Jim_C

    As of 1:15, a -6 for this post.

    I wonder if they even know what you've said that they're objecting to?

    Methinks they just don't like the cut of your jib!