United Nations Ignores Al-Qaeda Link to Syrian Rebels

Pages: 1 2

A day after Kofi Annan, the Joint Special Envoy for the UN and the League of Arab States for the Syrian Crisis, announced his decision to resign in frustration over the failure of the United Nations Security Council to pass a strong resolution that would enforce compliance with his six-point Syrian peace plan, Arab League members led by Saudi Arabia and Qatar went to the UN General Assembly for a symbolic vote on a resolution strongly condemning the Assad regime. The resolution said nothing about al Qaeda and other Islamist jihadists who are hijacking the armed opposition and committing their own atrocities.

The final draft resolution passed on August 3rd, with 133 in favor, 31 abstaining and 12 against. In order to secure more votes in favor of the resolution, the measure’s Arab League sponsors had to water down its text.  They agreed to remove a demand that President Assad resign. They also agreed to water down a call for other nations to impose sanctions on Syria. Without such dilution, the resolution would most likely have failed to gain a supporting majority.

Nevertheless, the final resolution text retained its focus of condemnation on the Syrian regime. It called out the “the increasing use by the Syrian authorities of heavy weapons, including indiscriminate shelling from tanks and helicopters, in population centres and the failure to withdraw its troops and the heavy weapons to their barracks…”

After reciting a long litany of “widespread and systematic gross violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms by the Syrian authorities and pro-government militias,” the resolution made only a glancing reference to possible “human rights abuses by armed opposition groups.” While condemning all violence, “irrespective of where it comes from,” the resolution said that it was up to the Syrian regime to take the “first step in the cessation of violence.”

The General Assembly resolution also took a swipe at the Security Council – and, by implication, the two permanent members Russia and China that had used their veto power in that chamber to block a Security Council resolution calling for sanctions. The General Assembly resolution deplored “the failure of the Security Council to agree on measures to ensure the compliance of Syrian authorities with its decisions.”

Unlike the Security Council, which under the UN Charter has enforcement powers to back up its resolutions, General Assembly resolutions are unenforceable. The General Assembly resolution does not change a thing on the ground in Syria. Kofi Annan’s peace plan remains dead in the water. The UN observer mission in Syria has been unable to conduct any significant monitoring, has shrunk to about half of its original size and may well be removed altogether when its mandate runs out later this month. The violence continues unabated.  Arms are being sent by Russia and Iran to the Assad regime. Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey are arming the opposition.  Atrocities committed by the Assad regime are being increasingly mirrored by atrocities committed by the armed opposition, particularly as al Qaeda and other outside jihadist groups continue to increase their presence in Syria.

Nevertheless, the spin machine was on full display after the General Assembly vote as if some kind of game-changing event had taken place.

The Saudi Arabian UN Ambassador Abdallah Y. al-Mouallimi hailed the vote as a major diplomatic victory against the Assad regime. He said that he hopes “the message will be heard in Moscow and Bejing,” in an obvious reference to the double veto of the last Security Council resolution by Russia and China. His hopes were quickly dashed when Russia and China supported Syria in voting against the resolution, along with the likes of Iran, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea. While Russia and China could not veto the General Assembly resolution, as they had in the Security Council, there was no sign of any softening of their position. Indeed, Russia’s UN Ambassador Vitaly Churkin charged that the resolution was very one-sided, evidencing “blatant support for the armed opposition.”

France, as usual, took the lead for the West in expressing vehement public support for anything that could be done to humiliate and help bring down the Assad regime.

French UN Ambassador Gérard Araud, who is also the president of the Security Council this month, praised the “colossal majority” that voted in favor of the General Assembly resolution. He said:

I think it is obvious that there is a wide consensus in the international community to say to the government of Syria: ‘You have to cease the indiscriminate violence against the civilians, the violations of the Human Rights, the violations of the Humanitarian law when you shell civilian neighbourhoods and you have to enter into a political dialogue.’

British UN Ambassador Mark Lyall Grant said his country was pleased that “an overwhelming majority” of the General Assembly had voted for “a tough resolution on Syria which condemns the brutality, the human rights abuses perpetrated by the Syrian regime.”

When I asked Ambassador Grant what he would say to critics of the resolution who complained that it was not balanced, and specifically that it did not take note of the role of al Qaeda and other Islamist jihadist groups as part of the armed opposition, he declared that the resolution was not meant to be balanced.  He painted a benign picture of the opposition, insisting that it “had to take up arms to defend itself and to defend its civilian neighbourhoods.”

Not to be outdone, however, Syrian UN Ambassador Bashar Ja’afari accused the resolution’s main sponsors, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Bahrain, of being hypocritical “despotic oligarchies.” The Syrian ambassador said of the Gulf countries providing arms to the opposition, “You cannot be a fireman and arsonist at the same time.”

Pages: 1 2

  • melvin polatnick

    Providing better equipped prayer halls for the poor will quiet the rebellion. Showers, meeting halls, gyms, and free snacks are needed in Mosques to raise the standard of living for the neglected. Each Imam must be provided with a large staff of spiritual counselors to sooth the minds of angry Wahhabi, Salafi-jihad, and Mujahedin. The more fortunate Alawite and Christians must share their wealth; it will help Allah shine his blessings on all Syrians.

  • ★FALCON★

    Anyone paying attention over the last two decades finds no surprises here. Democrats, al-Qaida and the Muslim Brotherhood have been alligned at the hip for a very long time – they are simply open about it now.

    The 9-11 Commission was an utter joke – especially when you have Richard Ben-Veniste running interference and making sure the truth never comes out.

  • Bamaguje

    Hypocrisy of the highest order… Saudi Arabia promoting "freedom & democracy" in Syria which the Islamist kingdom is more repressive than Assad's quasi-secular Syria..

    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

      When Iran threatened the kingdom, did they really think there wasn't any way for the Saudi's to strike back?

  • Toecutter

    The UN is al Qa’ida. The UN is also nothing more than a twilight home and gravy train for aging Third World fourth-rate dictators. The best thing for the world would be for the UN to be dismantled and its bureaucratic, bludging hacks to be dragged out into the street and shot and their fancy suits burned!

  • mrbean

    Let them all kill each other, kinda like culling the herd. Muslims killing thousands of Muslims. I can live with that.

  • Katharina

    The FASCIST & WAR-CRIMINAL Saudi/Qatar royals, Obama & Cameron's REGIMES are lying – this has nothing to do with democracy or a religious war betwen Sunni and Shiites (but Obama is indeed the most dangerous agent in all this dirty but most evil game since he has hijacked the White House & America!). It's about ROBBING the OIL-RICH non-Arab countries, as in Egypt, Libya, Tunisia and now Syria; whilst Arabicizing all non -Arabs especially Christians especially the Assyrians, and non-Arab Muslims like the Black Libyan Muslims, the Egyptian Muslims or the Alewite Muslim Syrians, and of course, would include sexually enslaving the women/girls in the most vile Saudi-Arabic veils. Islam is being used as a weapon through Jihadist terrorism as led by the most dangerous Muslim Brotherhood Jiahdists in Nazi-like propaganda to brainwash the Arab masses and the much ignorant world to support such unacceptable FASCISM. Ultra-nationalist Socialist Hitler mass murdered so savagely the Jews not ultimately because they were Jewish but to rob the Jewish’s massive wealth by using religion as a pretext and built a supremacist, violent, sexist and racist German Empire; where he used Christianity to brainwash the Christian German masses to religiously and racially hate the Jews (Jews is a race since ancient times as has been proven in the Bible unlike other religious followers of Christianity, Islam etc). And now the same in the Middle-East – a similar supreme, violent, sexist and racist Arabic Empire, Saudi-style is created bit by bit – just as Mohammed did through creating Islam, to rob in his first FASCIST conquest, the wealthy Jewish kingdoms, whilst mass murdering, raping, enslaving and Arabicizing them.

  • Flowerknife_us

    Failure is the only option. Obama and the demoncrats changed what side America was on. Having it blow up in their faces is Americas best hope.