‘Extremist’ Jews and Christians Are Like Islamists?


Pages: 1 2

The church leaders pushing these anti-Israel resolutions believe they are doing so in the name of “justice for the Palestinians.”   They refuse, however, to consider the anti-Jewish and anti-Semitic nature of the Arab-Muslim Palestinian leadership, and its refusal to recognize the right of Israel to exist as a Jewish State and to live in true peace and security.  All the buzz words: occupation, right of return and settlements, obfuscate the real issue – that of Islamic intolerance towards any non-Muslim/non-Arab sovereign entities in the Middle East.  Had the Arab-Palestinians wished to live in peace and security with the Jews and recognize the Jewish historical rights in their ancestral home, an Arab-Palestinian State would have been established in 1937 under the Peel Commission or in 1947, under the UN Partition Plan.  Had the Arabs accepted the division of Palestine into Jewish and Arab states, there would have been no issues such as occupation, settlements, or refugees. Lest we forget – there were 850,000 Jewish refugees from Arab countries – a number far greater than the oft-quoted “Palestinian-Arab refugees.”  While Israel absorbed and re-settled the Jewish refugees at great cost when the nascent state had barely recovered a five-pronged attempt by Arab armies to obliterate it, the Arab countries turned their backs on their people and have perpetuated the homelessness of Palestinian refugees.

The unfettered malice towards the Jewish State, and the outrageous comparison to Apartheid South Africa, is strangely absent when one notes the violence and persecution of non-Muslims in the Middle East and beyond, by both Muslim states and by the Palestinians in Gaza and Ramallah. Although not all Muslims are terrorists, most terrorists in the 21st Century have been Muslims, who have killed in name of Allah.

Taking issue with the Clinton administration for pressuring Israel and not the Arabs, U.S. Representative and Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich (R-GA) had this to say on April 9, 1997, “There is extraordinary danger in treating terror and democracy equivalently.  There is extraordinary danger in placing the burden on friends, because you are scared to tell the enemy the truth.”

Jeane Kirkpatrick, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. during the Reagan Administration and author of the book “The Myth of Moral Equivalency” pointed out the following:  “Marxism incorporates, at the verbal level and the intellectual level, the values of liberal democracy in its assault on liberal democracy, and this is precisely why it entraps so many Western intellectuals who are themselves serious liberal democrats.  Thus the slightest restriction on, let’s say, the presumption of innocence of the accused is said to demonstrate the absence of the rule of law.  The slightest failure of an electoral system demonstrates contempt for political equality.  Any use of force in international affairs establishes the lawless character of the society.  Now, it is a short step from having demonstrated that a country like the U.S. is not law-abiding society to demonstrating that it is lost and that it is like any other lawless society (morally equivalent-JP).  The Soviets can always claim ‘We are no worse than you.  Even if we are a lawless society, you too are a lawless society, we are no worse than you.’ This is the logic of the doctrine of moral equivalence.”

What is true in reference to America in its confrontation with the Soviets as described by Jeane Kirkpatrick is also true about Israel in its struggle with the Palestinian Arabs, and it is just as true in distinguishing the Judeo-Christian values from that of Islamism.

It is unfortunate therefore that the mainline Protestant churches and the Unitarian churches in particular have adopted the Marxist notion of moral equivalency while abandoning the truth of a universal right and wrong as enshrined in the holy books of Jews and Christians and manifested in the Judeo-Christian ethos.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Pages: 1 2

  • Mel M

    Yes there are Christian extremists as well as Muslim extremists. But their respective conducts are polar opposites. In order to be "extreme", one must take a teaching far past its intended point. The point which the proponents of "moral equivalence" don't get is that there is no teaching on violent behavior for Christians to "take to extreme". A "Christian" who espouses violence against the innocent is simply not practicing Christianity. He is a heretic, not an extremist. Instead, a true Christian "extremist" is someone who takes a teaching from the Bible such as (for example) "pray without ceasing", then leaves society to live in a monastery where he prays for the rest of his life. Or someone who literally gives up all his possessions for the poor and lives as a homeless vagrant himself.

    On the other hand, Muslims who commit violence are simply acting on the exact teaching of their founder Muhammed, who himself was a violent man and who advocated it for his followers.

  • Juddea

    I don't care if there are actually Christians and Jewish Extremists. When they start beheading people, blowing up bombs in civilian hot spots, murdering indiscriminately on large scales, hijacking planes and crashing them into buildings, opening fire on schools, then we can talk. Until then, all you Progressive scumbags can go pound sand….

    • randy

      What about the christians that stole north america?

    • http://Frontpagemag.com Aliyu

      The christians and jews committed the worst atrocities in history and are still on it. This is not a hiden fact.

  • cjk

    Moral Equivalency is one of the Left's foundational pillars. You will see it everywhere and all the time wherever and whenever the Left operates.
    This isn't a theory, this is a law.

  • Schlomotion

    There is also the perversity of claiming to be morally equivalent to no one on the face of this earth. That is Joseph Puder's perversity. There is a further perversity of wheeling out the YPSL, Jeane Kirkpatrick.

  • Ghostwriter

    Another day,another cretinous statement from Schlobrain.

    • Western Canadian

      Be gentle with him. He would appear to be a lawyer, and we all know that the average lawyer was attracted to that field by the lack of requirement for any form of intelligence or integrity. He can’t really help himself.

  • Wint

    An excellent article. It is frightening that Christians behave in this way. They seem to be stuck in the loop of forgiving their enemies, with no thought for others' lives. What is needed is for the persecuted Christians in Arab countries to speak out on how those Christians feel about their coreligionists forgiving the people who attack them – and to send all the holier than thou Christians from the West into these situations. How many would forgive if their families were threatened with death?

    It is awful that not only do those right-thinking Christians who recognize the very real danger of Islamisation have to battle against Islamism – but they have to battle against their own people who are intent on feeding them to the Muslim crocodiles. The same is true regarding Jews – they try to make their own communities aware of what faces them when (not if) the "tipping point" leading to total Islamisation comes, and they are reviled and insulted – by people of their own faith.

    This enablement is not "progressive" – by refusing to acknowledge this Muslim elephant in the room and preventing others from doing so – they are fascists.