U.N. Me: New Documentary Not to Be Missed

Pages: 1 2

Horowitz proceeds to relate a number of UN debacles, from allowing Rwandan massacres in the ’90s to the UN’s “oil for food” scandal, “the biggest scam in the history of humanitarian relief,” as journalist Claudia Rosett says in the film. U.N. Me reserves special condemnation for Boutros Boutros-Ghali, the UN Secretary-General in the early ’90s, who enabled or ignored both those atrocities.

When asked what the UN does to stamp out international terrorism, Javier Ruperez, who identifies himself as the Executive Director of the Counter-Terrorism Executive Directorate of the Counter-Terrorism Committee of the UN Security Council, assures Horowitz that his people collect reports from countries about their anti-terrorism efforts, and if a country refuses to comply, “we go there and we talk to them, and stay in the country quite a long time – around a week.” Asked who the biggest terrorist offenders are, Ruperez replies, “For obvious reasons, I shouldn’t name names. This is not the practice of the United Nations, this is not the practice of the Counter-Terrorism Committee.”

It certainly isn’t. Horowitz points out that the UN has not named a single country as having connections to terrorism. He goes on to challenge Ruperez and Duarte about the UN’s inability to even define terrorism. He shows Duarte the entry for “terrorism” in a Webster’s Dictionary – why not just run with that one? Duarte counters that the problem is to find a definition “that everyone can agree on.” One shouldn’t have to be an Executive Director of an Executive Directorate to see that state sponsors of terrorism have a vested interest in not agreeing with the Webster’s definition. But no matter – for Ruperez, the Counter-Terrorism Committee’s practice is all about “dialogue.”

The UN has an “institutional difficulty with determining that one side is the aggressor and one side isn’t,” says one critic. It also has difficulty actually judging member countries that violate the principles of its own charter. As for the organization’s appointments of the world’s biggest human rights abusers (Syria, North Korea, Iran, etc.) to its Human Rights Council, a UN guide shrugs to Horowitz, “No country is perfect.”

Horowitz closes the film by engaging a member of Ahmadinejad’s staff in a discussion of human rights. The Iranian openly asserts that there shouldn’t be one standard of human rights. Naturally not, since if standards vary according to cultural differences, governments that execute homosexuals, stone women to death, and covertly pursue a nuclear arsenal can’t be held accountable – not that the UN ever holds anyone, itself included, accountable.

If anyone ever needed further evidence that the United Nations has disastrously perverted its original mission, the very compelling U.N. Me is it.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Pages: 1 2

  • Ken

    U.N. – Useless Nutjobs!!

    • robertpinkerton

      Useless Nut-jobs who inhabit a fancy-dress little boys' masturbating club.

  • http://www.invisibleserfscollar.com Robin

    Now that the UN is tageting human happiness and wellbeing as their goals, I don't think there is anywhere there intrusions do not aspire to reach.

  • clarespark

    There is a great deal to be ashamed of in the UN's record. Having done archival research in the Ralph Bunche papers at UCLA (regarding his career as a UN employee), I can vouch for that. I gave a hint of what is to be found in this essay: http://clarespark.com/2009/09/11/oil-politics-and…. Title: Oil politics and Obama's view of Israeli history. Anti-Zionists are currently alleging that Israel's founding was based on terrorism. This blog addresses that obliquely.

  • guest

    Its a Muslin controlled agency. What more needs to be said? Perhaps O should send the black panthers there to take senior positions? Acorn at the UN

  • Yustin

    Biggest circle jerk the world has seen