<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Will History Remember Obama&#8217;s &#8216;Cairo Speech&#8217;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mary-grabar/how-will-history-remember-obamas-cairo-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mary-grabar/how-will-history-remember-obamas-cairo-speech/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-will-history-remember-obamas-cairo-speech</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Rogers</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mary-grabar/how-will-history-remember-obamas-cairo-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-3697189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Rogers]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 02:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=148276#comment-3697189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Might  I suggest that anyone who agrees w/ the forgoing comments ACTUALLY go to youtube and watch to the unedited video of the Cairo speech. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might  I suggest that anyone who agrees w/ the forgoing comments ACTUALLY go to youtube and watch to the unedited video of the Cairo speech. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asher</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mary-grabar/how-will-history-remember-obamas-cairo-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-3692229</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Asher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=148276#comment-3692229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Obama&#039;s Cairo speech he said, &quot;America and Islam are not exclusive and need not be in competition.  Instead they overlap, and share common principes...principles of justice and progress; tolerance and dignity of all human beings.....What principles do we share, Jihad, treating women like dogs, blowing people up, or crashing jet liners into buildings?  What kind of progress, many of the people in the Middle East live in poverty and don&#039;t even have running water or Freedom to do anything.  Talk about decpeption! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Obama&#039;s Cairo speech he said, &quot;America and Islam are not exclusive and need not be in competition.  Instead they overlap, and share common principes&#8230;principles of justice and progress; tolerance and dignity of all human beings&#8230;..What principles do we share, Jihad, treating women like dogs, blowing people up, or crashing jet liners into buildings?  What kind of progress, many of the people in the Middle East live in poverty and don&#039;t even have running water or Freedom to do anything.  Talk about decpeption! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mary-grabar/how-will-history-remember-obamas-cairo-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-3690029</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 02:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=148276#comment-3690029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;freedom and self-determination are not unique to one culture. These are not simply American values or Western values; they are universal values.&#8221; 
 
&#039;This is probably true in fact - but the meanings of freedom and slef-determination may vary.&#039; 
 
Then it&#039;s doublespeak the moment you say they are universal. If you want to make that argument, you have to start with denying objective truths exist, and then you must leave off the last phrase. Also, &quot;self&quot; refers to the individual. It&#039;s usually doublespeak to apply it to collectivist ideologies.  
 
Islam and communism are both collectivist and conflict fundamentally with the West and specifically with the US constitution. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;freedom and self-determination are not unique to one culture. These are not simply American values or Western values; they are universal values.&rdquo; </p>
<p>&#039;This is probably true in fact &#8211; but the meanings of freedom and slef-determination may vary.&#039; </p>
<p>Then it&#039;s doublespeak the moment you say they are universal. If you want to make that argument, you have to start with denying objective truths exist, and then you must leave off the last phrase. Also, &quot;self&quot; refers to the individual. It&#039;s usually doublespeak to apply it to collectivist ideologies.  </p>
<p>Islam and communism are both collectivist and conflict fundamentally with the West and specifically with the US constitution. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felsen Stark</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mary-grabar/how-will-history-remember-obamas-cairo-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-3689460</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Felsen Stark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 22:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=148276#comment-3689460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have not yet met an regular Obama supporter or a fence rider, that when I ask them, what did you think of the Cairo speech, does not display anything but a blank face. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not yet met an regular Obama supporter or a fence rider, that when I ask them, what did you think of the Cairo speech, does not display anything but a blank face. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EthanP</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mary-grabar/how-will-history-remember-obamas-cairo-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-3689438</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EthanP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 22:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=148276#comment-3689438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does it really matter what the fact, the true history, happens to be. Textbooks are mostly written by liberal left professors. They will praise Obama. If Romney wins the election, he will be condemned. If he loses, he will be ignored. History used to belong to the winners. Now it belongs to far left academicians. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it really matter what the fact, the true history, happens to be. Textbooks are mostly written by liberal left professors. They will praise Obama. If Romney wins the election, he will be condemned. If he loses, he will be ignored. History used to belong to the winners. Now it belongs to far left academicians. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PAthena</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mary-grabar/how-will-history-remember-obamas-cairo-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-3689388</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PAthena]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 22:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=148276#comment-3689388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama is, I suspect, a Mohammedan himself.  He has supported Huma Abedin, close aide of Secretary of State Hllary Clinton, whose family are members of the Muslim Brotherhood and Sisterhood, but she herself has been active on its account.  See Andrew McCarthy on this.  He has tried to remove any references to Islam, by the Pentagon, etc., but he has renamed the Fort Hood massacre by Nidal Hasan, who killed 13 people at Fort Hood, yelling Allahu Akbar, &quot;workplace violence&quot; instead of what it was, a Muslim terrorist attack. 
His reference to the &quot;prophet of Islam&quot; is itself an indication that he is Mohammedan.  Non-Mohammedans do not refer to Mohammed as a prophet. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama is, I suspect, a Mohammedan himself.  He has supported Huma Abedin, close aide of Secretary of State Hllary Clinton, whose family are members of the Muslim Brotherhood and Sisterhood, but she herself has been active on its account.  See Andrew McCarthy on this.  He has tried to remove any references to Islam, by the Pentagon, etc., but he has renamed the Fort Hood massacre by Nidal Hasan, who killed 13 people at Fort Hood, yelling Allahu Akbar, &quot;workplace violence&quot; instead of what it was, a Muslim terrorist attack.<br />
His reference to the &quot;prophet of Islam&quot; is itself an indication that he is Mohammedan.  Non-Mohammedans do not refer to Mohammed as a prophet. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LindaRivera</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mary-grabar/how-will-history-remember-obamas-cairo-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-3689178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LindaRivera]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=148276#comment-3689178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Muslim Obama sitting in the White Mosque and other Western leaders 
apologized profusely for the movie to the world&#8217;s Muslims and 
continually grovelled before Muslims. It was quite irrelevant to Obama 
and other merciless Western ruling elites that the Muslims barbarically 
murdered the U.S. ambassador and other non-Muslim innocents. 
 
Muslim Obama and Western leaders are extremely DELIGHTED to use the 
movie as an excuse to DESTROY our freedom of speech and implement 
Islamic sharia blasphemy laws. 
 
Barack Hussein Obama told the UN General Assembly: &#8220;The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.&#8221; 
One blogger stated: I consider that statement a death threat to me and all anti-Islam 
bloggers, authors, and activists by the President of the United States&#8230; 
 
When DECEIVER, Emperor Barack Hussein Obama declared: &#8220;The future 
must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.&#8221; he meant 
the future must not belong to those who tell the TRUTH about Islam.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muslim Obama sitting in the White Mosque and other Western leaders<br />
apologized profusely for the movie to the world&rsquo;s Muslims and<br />
continually grovelled before Muslims. It was quite irrelevant to Obama<br />
and other merciless Western ruling elites that the Muslims barbarically<br />
murdered the U.S. ambassador and other non-Muslim innocents. </p>
<p>Muslim Obama and Western leaders are extremely DELIGHTED to use the<br />
movie as an excuse to DESTROY our freedom of speech and implement<br />
Islamic sharia blasphemy laws. </p>
<p>Barack Hussein Obama told the UN General Assembly: &ldquo;The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.&rdquo;<br />
One blogger stated: I consider that statement a death threat to me and all anti-Islam<br />
bloggers, authors, and activists by the President of the United States&hellip; </p>
<p>When DECEIVER, Emperor Barack Hussein Obama declared: &ldquo;The future<br />
must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.&rdquo; he meant<br />
the future must not belong to those who tell the TRUTH about Islam.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mary-grabar/how-will-history-remember-obamas-cairo-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-3689140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=148276#comment-3689140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama is guilty of postulating the theoretically ideal dialectic, without any view of how the real world actually works. Therefore, his agenda and Administration are bent on this presumption, rather than paying an attention to history, the motivations of those who despise us no matter what our public pronouncements are, whilst also ignoring the economic ground game here at home. We simply cannot afford sustained military commitments including large scale occupation deployments, as we did after WWII, because we are a debtor nation now, not the largest creditor as we were in 1945.  
 
It seems that the Russians and the Chinese have learned these lessons particularly well since 1989.  
 
A pretty hard look at the nature of committing our armed forces to wars that actually promote our national security purposes is what is called for. Getting swept into a conflict, as in 1898, or 1964, may not be in our best interests until we can afford that sort of force projection again (or wish to perpetuate it).  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is guilty of postulating the theoretically ideal dialectic, without any view of how the real world actually works. Therefore, his agenda and Administration are bent on this presumption, rather than paying an attention to history, the motivations of those who despise us no matter what our public pronouncements are, whilst also ignoring the economic ground game here at home. We simply cannot afford sustained military commitments including large scale occupation deployments, as we did after WWII, because we are a debtor nation now, not the largest creditor as we were in 1945.  </p>
<p>It seems that the Russians and the Chinese have learned these lessons particularly well since 1989.  </p>
<p>A pretty hard look at the nature of committing our armed forces to wars that actually promote our national security purposes is what is called for. Getting swept into a conflict, as in 1898, or 1964, may not be in our best interests until we can afford that sort of force projection again (or wish to perpetuate it).  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PAthena</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mary-grabar/how-will-history-remember-obamas-cairo-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-3689000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PAthena]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 19:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=148276#comment-3689000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama is, at the very least, an ignoramus promoting Mohammedanism.  Why did he make a speech about it in Cairo?  He said in this speech that:  (1) Mohammedans invented the printing press (Gutenberg in Mainz did that, and the Chinese did as well); (2) Mohammedans invented the compass (the Chinese did that);  (3)  Mohammedans founded the first university (Italians in Bologna did that). 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama is, at the very least, an ignoramus promoting Mohammedanism.  Why did he make a speech about it in Cairo?  He said in this speech that:  (1) Mohammedans invented the printing press (Gutenberg in Mainz did that, and the Chinese did as well); (2) Mohammedans invented the compass (the Chinese did that);  (3)  Mohammedans founded the first university (Italians in Bologna did that). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: curmudgeon</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mary-grabar/how-will-history-remember-obamas-cairo-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-3688282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[curmudgeon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=148276#comment-3688282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the muslim in chief has a point.   the similarities between &quot;infidels&quot; and muslims are overwhelming.    muslims are willing to kill FOR  islam.    infidels are eager to be killed BY islam.    hence the tide of muslim immigration into previously islam-free nations.    nothing could have been easier than just saying no to islamic immigration.     it would be very easy, even now,  to send the invaders home.   we will see how easy the dying will be,  when we are genocided by the peaceful muslims we have intentionally clasped to our infidel busoms.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the muslim in chief has a point.   the similarities between &quot;infidels&quot; and muslims are overwhelming.    muslims are willing to kill FOR  islam.    infidels are eager to be killed BY islam.    hence the tide of muslim immigration into previously islam-free nations.    nothing could have been easier than just saying no to islamic immigration.     it would be very easy, even now,  to send the invaders home.   we will see how easy the dying will be,  when we are genocided by the peaceful muslims we have intentionally clasped to our infidel busoms.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jonmc</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mary-grabar/how-will-history-remember-obamas-cairo-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-3687991</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jonmc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 13:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=148276#comment-3687991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;freedom and self-determination are not unique to one culture.  These are not simply American values or Western values; they are universal values.&#8221; 
This is probably true in fact - but the meanings of freedom and slef-determination may vary. 
In a nutshell, &quot;freedom&quot; in Islam is defined as the freedom to fully practice Islam nicluding full Sharia implimentation etc. In other words, freedom in Islam is defined as freedom from everything EXCEPT Islam. 
I have to admit that I do not know how Islam would define &quot;self-determination&quot;, but given the above, I would expect something along the lines of &quot;to choose only Islam in everything&quot;. 
Therefore, Pres. Obama is correct, it&#039;s just that the concepts differ diametrically. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;freedom and self-determination are not unique to one culture.  These are not simply American values or Western values; they are universal values.&rdquo;<br />
This is probably true in fact &#8211; but the meanings of freedom and slef-determination may vary.<br />
In a nutshell, &quot;freedom&quot; in Islam is defined as the freedom to fully practice Islam nicluding full Sharia implimentation etc. In other words, freedom in Islam is defined as freedom from everything EXCEPT Islam.<br />
I have to admit that I do not know how Islam would define &quot;self-determination&quot;, but given the above, I would expect something along the lines of &quot;to choose only Islam in everything&quot;.<br />
Therefore, Pres. Obama is correct, it&#039;s just that the concepts differ diametrically. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mary-grabar/how-will-history-remember-obamas-cairo-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-3687539</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=148276#comment-3687539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;These are not simply American values or Western values; they are universal values.&#8221; 
 
&#039;This, of course, is patently false.&#039; 
 
To say the least. Coming from someone who claims he converted from Islam to Christianity...it&#039;s just clearly stupid to say. On the other hand, if a politician said that as part of wishful thinking to softly impose Western values as &quot;should be universal,&quot; that would be acceptable diplomacy. But based on evidence available through today, Obama really believes that Islam is either equal or superior to Western values (and probably that latter, and no I am not joking). The &quot;diplomatic statement&quot; was really an effort to fool the West! 
 
 
 
 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;These are not simply American values or Western values; they are universal values.&rdquo; </p>
<p>&#039;This, of course, is patently false.&#039; </p>
<p>To say the least. Coming from someone who claims he converted from Islam to Christianity&#8230;it&#039;s just clearly stupid to say. On the other hand, if a politician said that as part of wishful thinking to softly impose Western values as &quot;should be universal,&quot; that would be acceptable diplomacy. But based on evidence available through today, Obama really believes that Islam is either equal or superior to Western values (and probably that latter, and no I am not joking). The &quot;diplomatic statement&quot; was really an effort to fool the West! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 530/535 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 21:11:09 by W3 Total Cache -->