Chris Stevens’ Last Words

Obama administration emails leaked to news organizations about last month’s terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya, paint a shocking picture of the administration’s incompetence and callousness.

During the military-style assault on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi on Sept. 11, the eleventh anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, four American officials died, including U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens. On the day of the attack, a few hours before he was raped and murdered by adherents of the so-called religion of peace, Stevens wrote in an email that a local Libyan commander in Benghazi “expressed growing frustration with police and security forces (who were too weak to keep the country secure) …”

It was a sad, prescient understatement.

For two weeks after the attack the Obama administration said over and over and over again that the incident in Benghazi was inspired by a low-quality anti-Islam video on YouTube. Eventually the administration acknowledged it was a terrorist attack.

But those who have been following the disturbing developments in Libya with an open mind know the Obama administration has been lying about what happened there from the start.

The most charitable conclusion one can draw is that during the attack the Obama White House froze under pressure, unable or unwilling to act, as the president geared up for a fundraising event in fabulous Las Vegas, Nevada.

The less charitable, but more likely conclusion, is that the White House made a conscious, calculated decision to let American officials perish overseas, fully expecting the incurious pro-Obama media to ignore what really happened.

We now know that U.S. officials monitored an audio feed of the Benghazi attack in real time, as CBS News reported. During the attack, U.S. forces were in place in nearby Sicily, an hour or so away, but the order to fly to Benghazi in an attempt to rescue the besieged staff at the consulate never came.

That order was never issued by President Obama, probably because he knew it would reveal his policy of appeasement towards Islamic totalitarians to be in shambles as the Middle East and North Africa fell into the hands of America’s enemies.

Former CIA officer Clare M. Lopez, now a senior fellow at the Center for Security Policy, said Stevens knew al-Qaeda was targeting him but he lacked adequate security.

The Benghazi saga is a massive scandal, Lopez told Glenn Beck. “It’s huge, first of all, because we’ve got four dead Americans,” she said. “That’s the worst part of it all and nobody went to their assistance.”

Intelligence chief James Clapper, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and David Petraeus all know what really happened in Benghazi, Lopez opined.

“This has to be brought out. This has to be made known to the public. That this is going on and that our administration was not only working with the bad guys, was working with al-Qaeda linked militias and jihadis to overthrow [President Bashar Hafez] Assad in Syria, but that they let our mission go down. They let our ambassador and others die. In real time, watching it happen, and they didn’t do anything about it,” Lopez said.

The Benghazi post-mortem cover-up appears to have been orchestrated by Obama adviser Valerie Jarrett, investigative journalist Ed Klein told Andrew Wilkow on TheBlaze TV on Wednesday.

“In addition to Valerie Jarrett, the CIA got cables, the Department of Defense got cables, the NSA got cables during the attack on Benghazi, in addition to the emails that have since been made public. We know that there are cables that we haven’t seen yet confirming the State Department cable that this was an al-Qaeda linked attack.”

Klein said Clinton has documentary evidence that she previously asked for more security in Benghazi but that she won’t release it because it would torpedo Obama’s reelection bid and infuriate Democrats she might want to call upon should she run for president herself in 2016.

The late ambassador was painfully aware that Benghazi had been on the verge of exploding for some time. In a diplomatic cable in June, Stevens noted that “Islamic extremism” was on the rise and that “the Al-Qaeda flag” was flying over buildings outside Benghazi.

As the Washington Times reports, Stevens also wrote that attacks in Libya “targeting international organizations and foreign interests” were on the rise. An attack in June on the Benghazi mission blew a hole in a security wall, he indicated.

“Libyan security officials purport to have launched investigations,” Stevens wrote. One of those officials “shared his private opinion that the attacks were the work of extremists who are opposed to Western influence in Libya.”

“A number of local contacts agreed, noting that Islamic extremism appears to be on the rise in eastern Libya and that the Al-Qaeda flag has been spotted several times flying over government buildings and training facilities” approximately 100 miles east of Benghazi, the ambassador wrote.

In a cable dated Aug. 8, Stevens expressed concern that the “absence of significant deterrence” had “contributed to a security vacuum.”

As ABC News reported, a State Department email dated May 3, 2012, showed the department turned down a request from officials in Libya to retain a DC-3 airplane to help with security. Stevens was copied on the email.

A spokesman for the House Oversight Committee said the “State Department’s naive determination to follow rigid bureaucratic policies, instead of making common sense decisions that took the serious threat of terrorism conveyed by those on the ground into account, appears to have been a significant factor in the Benghazi Consulate’s lack of preparedness.”

As previously reported, leaked State Department emails dated Sept. 11, 2012, that were published this week show officials knew soon after the attack that Ansar al-Sharia, a Libyan terrorist group linked to al-Qaeda, had claimed responsibility for the assault on the consulate.

The emails found their way to as many as 400 U.S. national security, military, and diplomatic officials during the attack. The electronic missives were time-stamped in Eastern time and often bore the subheading SBU, which stands for “Sensitive But Unclassified.”

The initial email from 4:05 p.m. contains the subject header: “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack (SBU).”

“The Regional Security Officer reports the diplomatic mission is under attack,” read the email. “Embassy Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well. Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four COM personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17th of February militia is providing security support … The operations Center will provide updates as available.”

A second email stamped 4:54 p.m. contains “Update 1: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi (SBU)” as a subject line. “Embassy Tripoli reports the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi has stopped and the compound has been cleared. A response team is on site attempting to locate COM personnel.”

A third email stamped 6:07 p.m. features a subject line reading “Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack (SBU).”

“Embassy Tripoli reports the group claimed responsibility on Facebook and Twitter and has called for an attack on Embassy Tripoli,” it indicates.

Strangely, or perhaps not so strangely in the Age of Obama, America’s mainstream media has shown little interest in the atrocities in Libya as it focuses on silly distractions like what Mitt Romney really, secretly, truly, in his little capitalist heart made of coal, may have meant when he used the incomplete phrase “binders full of women” in the heat of an intense presidential debate.

Not much media attention has focused on the fact that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s handpicked chairman of the Department of State’s investigation of the Benghazi atrocities is an apologist for Islamic terrorism who has a cozy relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran, the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism.

As Frontpage Magazine was first to report this week, the chairman, former Ambassador Thomas R. Pickering, participated in a panel discussion Tuesday night in Washington, D.C. on “what role the faith community can play in fighting Islamophobia,” a make-believe mental illness. The term is used the same way American leftists use the word “racist” to shut down debate.

Many of those few journalists who are following the Benghazi story are in full-on damage control mode in order to help their hero, President Obama, win reelection.

For example, confirmation bias-afflicted Mother Jones reporter Adam Serwer, long a reliably useful idiot in the service of Obama, argued yesterday that a single Middle East analyst’s newly discovered skepticism about one of the State Department emails sent during the attack invalidated all criticism of the administration’s handling of the Benghazi saga.

Because no record could be found on social media websites of al-Qaeda linked terrorist group Ansar al-Sharia claiming responsibility for the massacre, the group couldn’t possibly be tied to the attack, Serwer wrote in a piece containing the in-your-face headline, “GOP’s Benghazi Smoking Gun Goes Up in Smoke.”

Nothing to see here. Move along.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

  • Sarah

    "Nothing to see here. Move along."

    Please refrain, force yourself if you have to, from using this phrase again. It is just so…common. It devalues the rest of the excellent article that preceded it. And for this reason, I have nothing to comment on the article itself.

    • Marilyn

      But you just did!

    • John

      So there's one stylistic mistake – or two or ten – learn to spit out that stuff and just get the point – grow up .

    • Michael Schneider

      Well, shut up then! Sorry to be so coarse and common!

    • Matthew Vadum

      Ouch. That seems unduly harsh.

      It's kind of glib perhaps but not that common really, unless you read Breitbart.com a lot.

      I don't think it has quite crossed over into cliche territory yet.

      Besides, it's hard to come up with a good ending at 4 a.m.

      How would you have ended it?

      • Carbondioxide

        Answer: "Nothing to see here. Move along."
        It is a good way to express the left's dismissive attitude to the ghastly threat of Islam. Thanks Matthew.
        It reminds me that in the spiritual blindness all find themselves in outside of faith in Christ alone, Islam is thought of as the Baptist church down the street from my Lutheran church except that it is more deserving of First Amendment protection and defamation of religion laws. In my South Dakota farm country town of 2000, the local ministerial association refused a member's suggestion to insert "Christian" in their title out of fear of being of being seen as less than welcoming. The Gospel of Tolerance has displaced the historic Gospel of Christ (to the extent the true gospel was at one time central in those churches).
        It is not foreign policy but it hints at what religious left churchgoing US policy makers hear each week: "Nothing to see here. Move along-Forward" and why heresy in the churches is is dangerous for all in the eternal as well as temporal.

    • Don Watson

      This article and articles like it are beginning to show what I suspected from the start of this. That is Clinton and Obama have been making a calculated risk in Libya, trying to incur street support by withholding military security. It fits right in with their approach to the middle east diplomacy. Stories about locals rising up against the Islamist radicals did follow. The implication is very serious: Stevens and the Navy Seals were sacrificed. This story won't go away.

      BTW – Dumb comment Sarah

    • mlcblog

      Tacky.

      It is so much easier to criticize. Why don't you see if you can write articles for FP?

    • Ann

      sorry sarah, you are “NOTHING TO SEE HERE…MOVE ON” we all know your not common…right, you are the phrase police, correct…get a life…

    • OldAce

      Okay I’ll say it if no one else will. Sarah, why don’t you STFU and move along. Nothing to see here!

    • objectivefactsmatter

      "Please refrain, force yourself if you have to, from using this phrase again. It is just so…common."

      Please refrain from using this phrase again: "It is just so…common." And get a thesaurus to make sure you never use any single word more than once. It's how we keep entertained. The message doesn't matter, it's only pleasing you about writing style that matters.

    • Fauxahontis

      It sucks when your lady parts are under duress once a month and you become intolerable and say stupid things.

    • atthebeach

      'Me thinks' Sarah has other issues. . Her comment is a 'poke' in her own eye. Hopefully; she will 'move along'

    • Mary Sue

      You are aware, are you not, that this is a commonly used phrase by Police when something horrific has happened? (or at least, TV cops)

  • R.C.

    He shouldn't have gotten involved with the Obama administration!

    • objectivefactsmatter

      "He shouldn't have gotten involved with the Obama administration!"

      That advice applies to the whole nation…the USA.

  • PaulRevereNow

    There's a video on http://www.westernjournalism.com, dated 10/25, posted by Kris Zane, that goes further than Mr. Vadum's article. This video says that Obama orchestrated the Behghazi attack, as part of a deal with Egyptian President Muhammad Morsi; whereby Chris Stevens was to be kidnapped, then exchanged for Omar Abdel Rahman, "The Blind Sheik." The video gives a source in the White House, close to Obama.
    There you go–Treason. Doesn't sound far fetched to me.

    • Glennd1

      Lol, "Doesn't sound far fetched to me" – you have left reality and you don't even know it. You do realize all the people who would be involved in such a scandal, yes? All those loyal Americans in State and DoD that would just have to go along with your absurd assertion. Do you think they would? Do you think the non-political types woudln't blow the whistle in a minute over something like that? Get some help, you are delusional.

      • Kufar Dawg

        Unless they're afraid, like the alleged film maker of Innocence of Muslims.

      • PaulRevereNow

        No, it is you who are afraid. The theory that Obama orchestrated these attacks, which I don't quite believe(and nowhere do I say I believe this theory), was actually discussed on the Rush Limbaugh show today. YOU are afraid of the fact that it might be true; and you are afraid of what we have already–that Obama deliberately failed to provide adequate security for the Embassy compound; that Obama and his military chiefs(Dempsey et. al) stood around with their hands in their pockets; when they could have easily ordered air strikes, with F-16's flying from Sicily. Face it, moron, we have a President who is, at best, criminally negligent. You tell me what he is, at worst.

      • Glennd1

        Do you have some kind of cognitive deficit? What about what I said would make you think I'm afraid? I'm not afraid – I'm disgusted by you. You are a hysterical partisan of the worst kind – closely followed by Rush Limbaugh apparently. You cite him as though he's an authority, as though if he says it that gives it any weight whatsoever. Lol, what an absurd useful idiot for the right you are.

        Now, did you notice that your last comment changed your premise? I"m quite ready to believe that Obama's admin pursued "normalization" and cut back security as a result. I can also believe that in the fog of that battle that the weak kneed political types held off on approving a DOD response, or other assets, in the interest of trying to "keep a lid on it". I despise them for it. But what you haven't presented any evidence for is your assertion that Obama made a deal with the MB for the Blind Sheik, and thought the best way to do so would be to have a terrorist attack be undertaken to facilitate Stephens kidnapping. You do realize that, yes? That you haven't presented (nor has any other article or source) a single fact that supports this accusation? That does matter to you, I mean, facts count, don't they?

        Incompetence and political correctness are all we need to explain what happened – we don't need truly baseless and wild conspiracy theories. And you lecture me as though you have something to say to me or others that is worth listening to, like you are going to straighten me out or something. Who do you think you are? I wonder if you realize how poorly you come off, first making wild accusations, then calling me names and lecturing – when you don't have a single fact to support the conspiracy part of your accusations. None. Nothing. Bupkus. Nada. What a joke you are, I can only imagine what a boor you must be, how tedious it must be to have to listen to your ranting and idiocy. I pity your co-workers, family members and what few friends a brutish dope like you might have for having to just deal with you.

        Go back to masturbating to Glenn Beck reruns or whatever it is you do when you aren't posting your partisan, paranoid and delusional fantasies.

        • PaulRevereNow

          Truthfully, I don't care what you're ready to believe. "Doesn't sound far fetched" does NOT mean I believe it. You obviously either don't understand that, or more likely you don't care. In your rush to humiliate and shut me up, you've ignored the meaning of this phrase, and showered me with name-calling and other garbage. The evidence for Obama's orchestrating the Benghazi attack is, at this point, circumstantial; however, since you've chosen to respond in a nasty, less-than-gentlemanly way, I'm not required to prove anything. I merely said that there's a video at a certain location, and it gives an explanation that might be true. And no thanks to you, I have the right to say that. You're a bully, sir.

          • aspacia

            PaulRevere, circumstantial is the most reliable evidence. Eye witness accounts are notoriously fallible.

          • Glennd1

            Go eff yourself, you moronic fool. You made a wild accusation about Obama plotting the attack with the MB and Al Qaeda to then swap Stephens for the Bllind Sheik. You are the one who made that claim, not me. But you have no facts – and don't try and say there is an actual circumstantial case for this. There isn't. There are better explanations, but you are a partisan a-hole, so you jump on anything – which makes you a fool

            I berate you and bully you because people like you misuse our liberty. You say wild things with no basis, and accuse the POTUS of the worst crime I can imagine without any evidence – circumstantial or other. Do you think your mindless babble here earns treatment as a gentelman? I would never give you that respect – because you are a joke of a human being. Do the world a favor and don't reproduce or vote, okay?

          • PaulRevereNow

            So Glennie, why aren't you berating people on the Huffington Post or the Daily Kos? (If
            you're as impartial as you claim.) What do you care if I accuse the POTUS of something? The columnists on this site do it all the time. And just who in the H-ll are you, to tell me I'm
            "misusing our liberty?" You must be some sort of union agitator. Go to my post about "Benghazigate," on this web site. I've accused the POTUS of something again! And if you don't like it, you can shove it. You're not going to shut me up.

        • Monique

          Up until you wrote “Who do you think you are?”, I actually thought you might have some constructive criticism which would benefit us all. While everyone flies off the handle on occasion, being able to put forth comments in a fashion so as to persuade, not belittle is the better path, don’t you think?

          • Glennd1

            Please, now you lecture me? Who do you think you are? Do you realize what this a-hole accused Obama of? Do you realize how wild and baseless his claims are? Are there no boundaries to you, of acceptable political behavior? When people do what this idiot did, I rip them apart. He's what's wrong with our politics and country – whether it comes from the left or right. It's the mindless partisan insanity that is the core of the problem. Thomas Jefferson said on many occasions that partisanship was the biggest danger to our republic. He believed that we had to use our reason and not give into the passion of the moment or of party. You may not understand how damaging this is on the right, but I bet you can see it on the left. To me, it's obvious it comes from both sides. So really, go lecture someone else – I'm in no need of your counsel. And be clear – I'm not trying to convince the moron above of anything, i'm out to give him a rhetorical butt kicking. Maybe if he's a big ashamed and cut down to his right and very small size, he'll keep his goddamned mouth shut in the future. Just a thought…

          • objectivefactsmatter

            "Do you realize what this a-hole accused Obama of? Do you realize how wild and baseless his claims are?"

            Baseless? Why, because it would be unprecedented? Not. Because Obama has earned our trust? Not.

            "Are there no boundaries to you, of acceptable political behavior?"

            Yes there are, and you've crossed the threshold in to petty abuse.

      • What’sInaPhrase

        PaulRevere, what you are saying sounds perfectly plausible. I would not put it past Obama, Jarrett and even Hillary. These people are really sick and anyone else like Petraeus (read “Betray Us”) would keep their mouths shut because 1) they’d be ruined politically or 2) they’d wind up dead.

        To Glennd1: You are incredibly naive. In fact, you are so naive, you are dangerous.

        • objectivefactsmatter

          "To Glennd1: You are incredibly naive. In fact, you are so naive, you are dangerous."

          His ideas are dangerous because he's echoing sentiments from his herd.

      • JohnInFlorida

        "Do you think they would?" … No.
        Do I think they COULD? … Yes.

        But the purpose of my reply is this:
        If you don't believe EVIL people can do evil things and their acolytes will turn away or close their eyes, they you REALLY need to re-examine your view of reality.

      • aspacia

        Glennd1,

        I also believe Zero is seditious for many reasons including this one. Additionally, he and his DOJ appointee are racist. Remember how he said the police acted stupidly when they arrested his friend and how if he had a son he would look like Trayvon?

        Nope, Zero is seditious and is attempting to ruin my land and destroy my hard won freedoms.

      • objectivefactsmatter

        "You do realize all the people who would be involved in such a scandal, yes? All those loyal Americans in State and DoD that would just have to go along with your absurd assertion"

        No, please tell us how many people in the US government would be involved in a kidnapping where Jihadis are already in charge of security in the Libyan embassy. I'm not saying I accept the accusations at face value, but your objection is not convincing.

      • Grayeagle

        Ever heard of intimidation? The Obama Thug Machine is scary, and don't think for a moment the Machine would not cut the heart out of anyone who crossed it!

    • 11bravo

      You are out of your cotton picking mind!! The Cairo demonstration was about freeing the blind sheik-not the video. Please stop with the nonsense!!!

    • Mrs. Rene O'Riordan

      I saw a video that was translated by an arab speaking guy which showed during all the chaos a guy saying "don't shoot them Morsi sent them" – can't find the video now but I think it was on http://landing.newsinc.com/shared/video.html?free… – I00% sure where I saw it but I am 100% sure I did see it. – Rene

      • objectivefactsmatter

        Shoebat has a link

    • johnsnare

      Obama's reelection has always been in trouble, and this amplifies, his exit out of the Oval Office. Four years was a little too long for our Muslim in Chief.

    • atthebeach

      Indeed; and providing 'arms'/weaponry to al Qaeda; ranks as well; as a 'Treason'. Seems Obama, should already have had; the 'knock on the door'. If only. . .

    • ehl2828

      I agree. This sure explains a lot of things about how Obama handled this and I read that Obama met with several Militant Muslims a few days before Sept. 11. This was according to someone's nephew who is a secret serviceman. I just hope this all comes out this week. I also read that people know about this are are trying to decide how to proceed. I hope this is true and it comes out soon.

  • Gene W 1938

    Obama is absolutely Satanically driven … his staff is currupt and evil.
    Chris Stevens knew too much about why Libya [and Egypt] was attacked in the first place, who ordered the arms to be moved to Syria via Turkey, and the planed demise of non Muslim Cleric approved leaders in the Middle East. Jordon is next !

    • mlcblog

      I think Chris Stevens was a sitting duck, falling victim to the radical left he loved to hang out with.

      • http://www.facebook.com/dennishabern Dennis Habern

        In regards to my reply to Gene W 1938, why was my comments, denied?

      • mlcblog

        On further review and after clicking on the web site offered here by someone who was watching Glenn Beck http://www.freedomrings1776.com/2012/10/benghazi-… it seems obvious that there's more here than meets the eye.

        Dennis H, I think you're in the wrong pew.

    • Eric J Young

      B. Hussein O. surely does suck $h1t from the bottom, I do agree. Please do not sink Satanists to his $h1t sucking level though. :)

  • Anthony

    Chris Stevens was part of the Obama team. He was Hilliary Clinton’s stooge. He was buddie-buddie with Moslem killers helping them kill other killers. In the end, his Liberalism got him dead and now the liberal media who should love Chris Stevens be aide of his leftism want nothing to do with his corpse. The liberal, scum media only has one goal-OBAMA/ “FOREWARD”!!!

    The sad thing is that two former SEALS died while Obams prepared to partying Vegas. Was it “Hip Hop”?, Big-Ass Beyonce? Rapper 50 Cent, or Jay Z at that fund raiser?

    This man, Obama, is beneath contempt. He is incredibly disgusting as a human, and slimy and incompetent as a leader of the good ole US of A.

    • DogWithoutSlippers

      If anyone insults the "Pervert" man Obama is quick to comment in this misfit's defense.

  • SHmuel HaLevi

    I truly hate having to refer to some thoughts people have been asking about. I rejected the subject but it has been nagging to may people.
    Would it have been a different response if the Ambassador was ……………………………………………?

    • JoJoJams

      …..A Republican? Eh, interesting thought, but I really don't think a higher melanin content (if that's what you were alluding to) would have made any difference. Anyone, regardless their "color", is expendable to the ideology of radical neo-liberalism. ;-)

  • PhillipGaley

    "The Benghazi saga is a massive scandal. It’s huge, first of all, because we’ve got four dead Americans,”?

    ". . . . atrocities in Libya"?

    Come now, . . . let's get real: I would say, on a scale of 1 – 10 with "Operation Fast and Furious", while the Benghazi saga is worth say, a good strong 2, "Operation Fast and Furious" is worth a good solid 10: with "Operation Fast and Furious", there are very many more innocent dead; most of the munitions are still out there, loose; "Operation Fast and Furious" was conducted against a neighboring nation state and trading partner; some of our people are the perps, . . . and remain as not yet having been through arraignment—would this be enough said?

    • JoJoJams

      Well, considering that an attack on a nations embassy used to be considered an act of war, your only rating it a 2 isn't correct, in my book. I'd give Benghazi the 10, and F&F an 8. but that's just my humble opinion.

    • Goldbug36

      This is a duplication of Fast and Furious .. we will soon learn that this was about gun running to al Qaeda in Syria via Turkey and Dubai. How many thousands have died in Syria? Stevens knew too much; he didn't like it; he was in over his head; and he had to be silenced. What about the "collateral damage?" To these evil people, we are all expendable.

  • Anthony

    Chris Stevens was part of the Obama team. He was Hilliary Clinton’s stooge. He was buddie-buddie with Moslem killers helping them kill other killers. In the end, his liberalism got him dead and now the liberal media who should love Chris Stevens because of his leftism want nothing to do with his corpse. The liberal, scum media only has one goal-OBAMA/ “FORWARD”!!!

    The sad thing is that two former SEALS died while Obams prepared to party in Vegas.

    Was it “Hip Hop”?, Big-Ass Beyonce? Rapper 50 Cent, or Jay Z at that fund raiser?

    This man, Obama, is beneath contempt. He is incredibly disgusting as a human, and slimy and incompetent as a leader of the good ole US of A.

    • http://twitter.com/undefined @undefined

      You are dead on with your comment with one exception… 50 cent is a Republican. True.

    • mlcblog

      http://www.freedomrings1776.com/2012/10/benghazi-

      as above, interesting theory at least

    • posse101

      Anthony,

      excellent post!

  • Steve Chavez

    J. CHRISTopher STEVENs versus Karl Marx Obama.

    Word next to M-A-R-X in the dictionary? M-A-R-Y, the mother of J. CHRIST.

    There is a war between Jesus and Marx. Look at everything Obama, and his "Circle" are doing to Christians, Jews, and to God and his policies towards Communism, atheism, and Islam/Allah. When Egyptians murdered Christians after the fall of Mubarak, Obama was silent. Make a video on Mohammad, he's in an uproar. CONNECT THE DOTS PEOPLE!

    FOR ANY JEW OR CHRISTIAN TO VOTE FOR OBAMA IS BEYOND REASON!

    • posse101

      Steve,

      perfect and compelling post!

  • Quiet on the O front

    The funerals of these four have been invisible. No media coverage, no photos. Quiet. Like it never happened. Ups, the corpses were met at the airport. The end of the story.

    • Geet Faar Ked Ded

      Interesting. Well said.

      The innocent often die in deafening silence. Obama is America's worst nightmare. Indeed, he is the world's worst nightmare. The silver-tongued assassin is your own president.

      Vote his bent arse out of office!

  • John

    Let's say the Mo Video was the straw that broke the camels back — the issue is not the video , the issue was and is THE REQUESTS FOR SECURITY WENT UNANSWERED FOR WEEKS .On top of that OBAMA IS COVERING IT UP .As some one else said NO ONE GOT KILLED AT WATERGATE AND NIXON WAS DESTROYED BY IT [THANKS IN LARGE 2 A LEFT MEDIA]

    • Annie

      Yes…and tortured and raped before he was killed. Have you looked at the photos of him as he's being dragged along…cut with ripped clothes, barely alive. It's so heartbreaking! So very heartbreaking for these men's families and friends! And then to be ignored! It makes me physically and spiritually sick!

    • Jane Biggers

      Nixon was not using the presidency to slaughter America but to create a better America. He was investigating communistic donations at the Watergate building. No one ever mentions why he did it. He did not have Americans murdered. I look for many more to die before it is over with and mass murders are coming. We will live to see the elderly murdered to cease more and more SS from being taken out of Social Security. Jews and Christians will be put into camps towards the end and suffer the deaths Hitler orchestrated in Germany during WW2. Hillary Clinton is wise and I think she is on to him. She looks worried doesn't she? George W. Bush is so quiet till he is too quiet…How many of them are onto him? How many know who he is ? How many are going to just let him keep on doing us in and sending our tax paying dollars to Iraq to rebuild their Country. Why is he so in love with the Muslims? Why is he in more defense of muslims rights then American rights? People we are in trouble, and we need to see who he is……………..

  • Atikva

    "Clinton has documentary evidence that she previously asked for more security in Benghazi but that she won’t release it because it would torpedo Obama’s reelection bid and infuriate Democrats she might want to call upon should she run for president herself in 2016"

    Mrs. Clinton shouldn't worry about this eventuality. After disgracing herself and her party, there is no chance whatsoever that she could run for president in the future, or even hold any official position anywhere. She will be lucky if she doesn't end in jail, without the comforting ministrations of her future ex-deputy chief of staff.

    • Mary Sue

      in which case she should damn well listen to BILL, because Bill knows more than anyone how to get out of a spot like this. She'd salvage at least something in the eyes of the American Public if she came clean, maybe a small tiny shard of dignity and honor.

      She'd still be completely unelectable of course, but still. Taking the bullet for Obama is NOT in her best interest.

  • Schlomotion

    I don't know what's more obscene, that one of our Ambassadors was raped or that Hasbarists have been relishing trotting that out every five minutes for the past month and a half. They seem to be savoring the fact and waving it like a Blutfahne.

    • tagalog

      Don't you mean "bloody shirt" or "bloody flag?" I don't thing there IS such a thing as A "blutfahne." Isn't THE "Blutfahne" a Nazi relic from the Beer Hall Putsch?

    • Kufar Dawg

      The only flags I saw waving in the Bengazi attack weren't Blutfahnes, but the rather the black flag of jihad. But then again, maybe it IS the same thing.

    • Drakken

      Nice to see you raising tha hammer and sickle scumbag.

    • Matthew Vadum

      I think Schlomo is being anti-Semitic here but the words he uses are so obscure it all gets lost.

      • Western Canadian

        He tends to hide behind obscurity…. of either thought or terminology.

      • Choi

        No guesswork needed,Matthew,he IS an Anti-Semite PAID TROLL

    • JoJoJams

      Well, considering the main-stream media isn't "trotting that out" – AT ALL – what used to be considered an act of war (attacking a nations embassy), I don't care who "trots" it out. It NEEDS to be trotted out and brought in to the light, so the American people can see! Most don't really know much about it! Bear in mind the main-stream media treatment of Abu Grahb (sp?) non-stop, ad nauseum for weeks on end, and compare that to this act of war on the United States, and your sophomoric comment turn to the vacuous pronouncement of an anti-semite, at best.

    • Shmuckmotion

      This piece of crap Shmuckmotion second in “crappinnes” only to obama has diversified and is now spilling his wisdom in other websites as well. People will be served if told to completely ignore this idiot’s rants, as he thinks very highly of himself and gets his ego more inflated each time someome responds to his moronic, biased, uniformed “contributions”. When you see his trade-mark name in the comments, just mark it thumbs down and move along, “nothing to read here”.

    • Ghostwriter

      Well,I know something EVEN more obscene,your disgusting posts,Schmuckmotion. You never miss a chance to bash Jews,don't you. I don't know why you continue to use the word "Hasbara" or "Hasbarist" but it's a safe bet it has something to do with Jews. You're a piece of garbage,Slugmotion. You have no humanity or decency. I long for the time when you're banned from this site.

      • Toa

        Ghost: I just searched "hasbara"; it means the act of "propogandizing" on Israel's behalf.
        Leave it to Schlomotion and his kind to use such a term quite freely.

    • Omar

      Flipside, quit it with your nonsense. Obviously, the Islamists have done this on purpose because they hate democracy and want to impose Sharia-style totalitarianism on the world. Do us a favor and keep your ignorance to yourself.

  • tagalog

    Leon Panetta is on TV the last couple of days saying that the administration wouldn't "deploy troops" until they had knowledge of what was happening on the ground. I guess they gave up on Hillary Clinton carrying their water for them. Who knows, she might have told the truth. Not that the press would have reported it if she actually by some miracle did.

    I guess that's why they didn't even bother to send a company of Marines to the embassy grounds to defend it, or send aircraft on flyovers of Libya. Just not enough knowledge.

    Of course, the Obama administration didn't have any problem precipitously sending our aircraft on overflights during the Libyan revolt days a few weeks ago, when they knew even less than they knew this time. But let's not get all bogged down in previous events; it's so un-progressive to do that.

    I guess this was a hands-on example of "leading from behind." Maybe too hands-on for the four people who were murdered.

    • mlcblog

      Troops? a few well placed special forces and more like that could have averted this slaughter, had the admin been willing and/or able.

  • guest

    Obama: Who cares. It wasn't a muslim that died, so I am OK with it not being optimal.

    In any case its muslim brotherhood setting foreign policy now.

    (The dpt of state is jammed full of muslim brotherhood members )

    The new deal is they want the UN to oversee the voting now. I suppose he can "executive order" it.

    • Theresa

      So is the white House does the name Valerie Jarrett the Iranian come to mind? This whole sordid affair was masterminded by her!

    • Mary Sue

      More like, I wish I had a tape recorder there because I'm positive I'd get a clip of something like "*^%$ this *&^%, I'm going to bed," from Obama's mouth, while he's watching this unfold.

  • libertygirl

    When the obscure video had been viewed only 17 times up to the day of the attacks, one must ask how it is that this particular video was selected to be the blame, when there are so many such videos on u-tube.
    How is it the government put on the dog and pony show of the continual blaming the video and arresting the man who made it… and the actors, who, one by one, claimed to have been tricked into acting in it?
    The culmination was Obama at the U.N. stating that, "The future must not belong to those who would slander the Prophet", just at the time, the muslim members were calling for Global Blasphamy Laws. Hillary co-sponsored a bill (#16/18) at the U.N. that would, if signed, have the Republic under Sharia Blasphamy Laws. The entire event seems entirely too well orchestrated to be some kind of coincidence or being blindsided or inept (these people are in no way inept, to think so is completely underestimating them) …. the left continues to use it's format of "Create the Problem, Be the Solution"….. which makes a whole lot more sense than anything else I have heard.

    • tagalog

      On the other hand, how did the Administration fasten on a video that was only viewed 17 times? Maybe it was 17 of the Obamaites who watched it, eh?

      • Jean

        They must have been digging like terriers.

      • libertygirl

        it would be interesting to know would it not?

    • mlcblog

      What are you talking about? Which Republic is she trying to bring under Sharia law at the UN?

      • libertygirl

        Read U.N. document 16/18 … to implement blasphamy laws, is implementing Sharia Law….

    • Bet

      I have thought this very thing! I believe they knew/coordinated the demonstrations and were all ready to use the events to further the speach/Internet restrictions. They were taken completely by surprise when al quada used the opportunity to attack Chris Stevens. Then they were scrambling, trying to reconcile what was actually happening with what they were expecting to happen. They did nothing and then used their planned video excuse to blame the American film maker. Only problem is the "spontaneous" narrative did not fit for anyone but the msm. Now those who were saved against orders are alive and singing like birds! This is not going away!

    • Mary Sue

      Walid Shoebat had an interesting theory. He said that one of the people involved in making it was a cousin of his who is also a terrorist.

  • John

    NOTHING…NOTHING could be worse than the thought of the potential circumstances of an emboldened Obama freed for another four years to carry out his plans for the destruction of our great country.

    • tagalog

      After the election he'll be more flexible, whatever happens.

      • Kufar Dawg

        After his statement about "The future must not belong to those who would slander the Prophet of Islam" that is what has me worried.

  • Paul of Alexandria

    Larry Johnson, at http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/, and interviewed

    by John Batchelor last night on WMAL, Washington DC, makes a good case

    that

    1) the “consulate” was, in fact a CIA cover operation training Libyan fighters for Syria and

    2) the attack was organized not by Al Qaeda but by Iran.

    There’s a lot going on here that we’re not aware of.

    • libertygirl

      again, the entire situation clearly was planned… however, the suggestion that it was a CIA cover op does not explain the continual requests for additional security nor the removal of security prior to the attack….nor the prepared blame game on the video and dog and pony show arrest of a man who was on probation not the kind he should have been arrested for, according to Kimberly Newsom…

      one can only imagine what it was to realize your imminent death because your government had foresaken you …

      • mlcblog

        You are saying that they coldly calculated that Chris Stevens would die. I am sorry. I cannot go that far. He was one of their own.

        I just think they are children of hippies and other dysfunctionals who do not have a clue about life in the real world as grownups who have to send reinforcements to protect our people sometimes.

    • Kufar Dawg

      LOL, the CIA. Did the CIA also bring down the WTC on 9-11-2001? Or was that Mossad?

  • Asher

    Christopher Stevens chose the wrong path to serve. It is fatalistic to think you can be united with Islamic radicals and be a friend..They will not allow that, and are forbidden to befriend Infidels and Jews. However the biggest image in people's minds are a President who gets the facts in the Situation Room, knows the truth of what actually happened about the deaths, and then goes to bed without trying to get some kind of a counter force or distraction in there…Then goes to Vegas the next day to campaign. It is obvious that the President's greater priorities are rooted in enabling the Radicals in the Middle East…who he deems as Freedom Fighters. An image people are not likely to forget!

    • libertygirl

      the notion that one could sleep with that knowlege or carry on with campaigning defies all rational thought… obama and his ilk are cold hearted humans, if one can call them human.

    • mlcblog

      Yup. They keep going to bed with their pet snakes and then being surprised as they die from the bite.

  • http://www.freedomrings1776.com/ Danny Jeffrey

    Glenn Beck asked “Why” about so many things regarding Benghazi and the death of Ambassador Stevens. Here is why!
    http://www.freedomrings1776.com/2012/10/benghazi-

  • http://weroinnm.wordpress.com/ weroinnm

    ‘TREASON’ AND POSSIBLE ‘PRISON’: BECK BREAKS DOWN OBAMA’S ‘LYING’ ON LIBYA IN FIERY SEGMENT!
    http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/tre
    “Food For Thought”

    Semper Fi!

    Jake

  • pierce

    Every body is blaming BO, but no one mentions Hilary. After all she is in BO's back pocket, and therefore takes some of the heat.

    • http://www.facebook.com/dennishabern Dennis Habern

      What does Bill Clinton say about this entire mess.

      How would he have handled it? Would he have called in the jet fighters to at least observe what

      was transpiring at the Benghazi Consulate, even tough the intelligence was not quite clear?

      Or did the Moron that currently resides in the White House, maintain other ideas to cover-up his

      gun-running, if you follow.

  • lizaz

    The blood of these men is on the incumbent……he likes to call himself "commander in chief"…..the buck stops with him!!

    • http://www.facebook.com/dennishabern Dennis Habern

      How can this Moron call himself the "COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF," when he has never worn the

      uniform and knowing how he detests everything that our American Military stands for. According to

      this Muslim hypocrite, it is so un-Muslim, or is it?

  • Robert A. Hall

    I don’t think it was “incompetence.” I think it was a cold political calculation that the political risks of a few dead Americans were less than the risks of a rescue that might fail and a firefight that might kill innocent locals and create protests against Obama and America. I will link to this from my Old Jarhead blog. (www.tartanmarine.blogspot.com)

    Robert A. Hall
    USMC 1964-68
    USMCR, 1977-83
    Massachusetts Senate, 1973-83
    Author: The Coming Collapse of the American Republic
    All royalties go to help wounded veterans
    For a free PDF of my 80-page book, write tartanmarine(at)gmail.com

  • ObamaYoMoma

    It's almost as if Obama and Clinton in coordination with the OIC purposely invited the attack to use the event as a medium in which to condition the American people into accepting the supremacy of Sharia over the American constitution that guarantees all Americans the freedom of speech.

    • JoJoJams

      That's certainly one possible explanation ~ Entirely plausible, given the players involved and their belief systems.

      • Mach1Duck

        With the lack of response and subsequence cover up it would look as if it were intentions of this administration to use this crisis for some other purpose.

    • Mary Sue

      Well, that makes sense, given Obama's EXTREMELY CREEPY declaration: "The future does not belong to those who insult Islam."

  • http://FrontPageMag Michael Canzano

    Stevens died because he wasn’t black .

    • JoJoJams

      Meh, melanin content doesn't matter. Anyone is expendable for the advancement of the neo-lib agenda.

    • Mary Sue

      I think one of the others that died was black, if I'm not mistaken? I could be misremembering, I am not sure.

      In any case, racism among Islamists is rife and insane. Just look at Omar Khadr, the canadian al quaida guy. He called his black female prison guard at guantanamo a slave and a whore.

  • American

    How Long Are The Sheeple Gonna Sit Hypnotized By What Is Happening With This Administration, The ONLY Thing That Matters To Our Government Right Now Is Reelection, Peoples Lives Are Just An Inconvenience.

  • BLJ

    Who is responsible for this?

    Barack HUSSEIN Obama.

    • Mary Sue

      mm-mm-mm!

      [/sarcasm]

  • Drakken

    If Stevens was meeting jihadists to send them and arms to Syria, and it is a big if, but what in the hell was this guy thinking? The jihadist will kill you before they go after the wrong type of muslim. I would also like to know what Huma Abedin was whispering in Clintons ear while this was going on.

    • WilliamJamesWard

      Maybe…………."we're missing sessamie street sweetie"?……………..William

    • Kufar Dawg

      Huma of the umma has all the appeal of wormtongue in the LoR.

  • Chezwick

    The handling of this tragedy absolutely wreaks of negligence and cover-up by Obama's Administration. That said, we conservatives have an obligation to police ourselves if we're ever to avoid descending down the liberal-worn path of lies and misinformation.

    My problem is with the following sentence by Mr Vadum…

    "On the day of the attack, a few hours before he was raped and murdered by adherents of the so-called religion of peace…"

    There is absolutely no evidence that Mr Stevens was raped, at least none I'm aware of. The assertion that he was photographed without his pants while being carried by Libyans was patently false.

    Imagine being the loved-ones of Mr Stevens….dealing with your grief, infuriated by all the stone-walling of the Administration, and then coming across Mr Vadum's article and this horrific, unproven assertion. Whatever antipathy they might have been feeling towards liberals in general for their unconscionable defense of this Administration…would likely be matched by the scurrilous assertion by Mr Vadum and other conservatives that the Ambassador was raped.

    Integrity….this is one quality that is supposed to distinguish conservatives from liberals. Unless someone has proof the Ambassador was indeed raped, let us STOP with the assertion.

    • atthebeach

      /There is absolutely no evidence that Mr Stevens was raped, at least none I'm aware of. The assertion that he was photographed without his pants while being carried by Libyans was patently false/

      Evidence? So there is an autopsy report for all to read?

      As for the picture – not, by your claim – of Ambassador Stevens ; this is absolutely, NOT, an 'assertion' . That photo; of Stevens being naked; as he was carried – as in 'thrown' over – someones' shoulders; like a sack of flour – WAS 'online'; early on; in this reporting. And it is a horrible picture to behold. Have not had reason to 'search' it; or 'revisit'; but saw it and more than once; and by more than one reporting. Perhaps now; this pic is no longer 'on line'; but no doubt; it is as 'alive' as Ambassador Stevens, is not. (This was NOT; a photo shop picture; by any stretch).

      Am wondering, how it is; by your, simply – not having seen it' – is enough to warrant, YOUR declaration, that Steven's being raped; is patently false? (For jihadists; this is considered a 'just desert' MO; sanctioned by Allah; as by their own hypocrisy; they disavow and condemn, homosexuality). And it is what they do to 'enemy' homosexuals. And by any and all, means; available.

  • mlcblog

    In a cable dated Aug. 8, Stevens expressed concern that the “absence of significant deterrence” had “contributed to a security vacuum.”

    I think it was both. They froze (didn't want it to be happening) and ignored it (hoping like children caught in the act of doing something wrong) that they could fool everybody into some other belief than what was real.

    August 8 would have been a good time to send help. I am disgusted with the so-called Pentagon (what noodle-brained liberal general is making the press announcements — who asked for "troops?!!" anything would have been helpful!! Anything at all. Even a gesture would have gone a long ways.) and then with my formerly admired Petraeus. Disappointing doesn't express my sorrow.

    What a fiasco this administration is.

    • WilliamJamesWard

      Obama and his thugish administration has brought down shame on our Nation. I can not
      think of a time a call for help was met by indifference by a commander in Chief who had
      to make it to a party and left Americans to die. Military leaders past and present must
      be doing a lot of soul searching, those who are the ambitious and cold hearted status
      climbers aside our leaders must be sick to death and as furious as every American
      Patriot can get. This will not end well for the cowards and malfeasant enablers of our
      sworn enemies………………………………………William

      • mlcblog

        I am just hoping and praying that there are enough people with the true American spirit who will vote against O's regime. We'll need a landslide of sorts to overcome the dead people and all the other tricks on the voter rolls right now. I just hope we can pull this out. Otherwise, we may be cooked.

    • WilliamJamesWard

      Obama and his thugish administration has brought down shame on our Nation. I can not
      think of a time a call for help was met by indifference by a commander in Chief who had
      to make it to a party and left Americans to die. Military leaders past and present must
      be doing a lot of soul searching, those who are the ambitious and cold hearted status
      climbers aside our leaders must be sick to death and as furious as every American
      Patriot can get. This will not end well for the cowards and malfeasant enablers of our
      sworn enemies………………………………………William

  • libertygirl

    Leon Panetta remarked, " You don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on"
    Please explain Mr. Panetta, why were 31 Americans, mosty Seal team 6, put on a Chanook Helicopter and sent into a "Hot Zone"????? You seemed to take no issue with that one! Who deployed them???

  • Marco Gilliam

    Tea Party and other patriots should be demonstrating on the National Mall, on the Capitol steps, in front of the White House, and in front of every major newspaper in America with signs that read: "Obama Treachery" and "CIA Manslaughter" and "Corrupt Media Aid Al-Qaeda."

  • Anthony

    Chris Stevens' last words, "But I thought that we were friends!".

  • fiddler

    What I find eerie is how Hillary said their loved one's over the caskets that she would make sure they "got" the guy who made the video. This is beyond bizarre. These heroes deserve better, just as the ones killed at Fort Hood do.

    • ObamaYoMoma

      It unequivocally proves Hillary's culpability. I hope she rots in jail for the rest of her miserable life. Her and her husband were always sleaze bags!

    • BS77

      Imagine that, outright lying to the families of the murdered Americans as the coffins came off the jet.
      This is bad.

    • atthebeach

      Shows by their own arrogance; just 'what' they think/imagine is the 'who'; that lives outside their
      'power bubble'. It is what these people who could not serve coffee/ or just hold a 'real job'; in the real world; think of those who do. (It is the 'God/guns' in slightly different context. But the 'core contempt' is the same.)

  • WilliamJamesWard

    Chris Stevens last words……….."Vote for Mitt Romney"………………..William

  • Sunbeam

    The present Obama Administration should be tried and prosecuted for working with America's enemies. If this were found to be true, the President and its staffs involved should be brought to justice. Those who are holding high positions or being elected to hold high profile positions must not take things into their own stride as to put America in a callous dangerous position as to allow its enemies to manipulate or influence its policy in regards to the present day problem facing the Middle East and globally as well. The probe must be done and action carried out to justify the caused, leaving no rooms of doubt to the deserving citizens of the land.

  • https://www.facebook.com/kender Kender Breitbart MacGowan

    Here's a plausible explanation of why the events unfolded as they did: http://tavernkeepers.com/benghazi-murder-wasnt-th

  • carlito

    Matt, I think you should retitle your website as Wingnut City. Just sayin'!

    Also, was he raped before or after he died of smoke inhalation?

    • carlote

      Both before and after. Muslims don't care either way. Rape is rape, donkey, camel, corpse or human.

  • fanlad

    Arming the enemies of the United States of America, and enemies of Israel is treason at best.

  • objectivefactsmatter

    "For two weeks after the attack the Obama administration said over and over and over again that the incident in Benghazi was inspired by a low-quality anti-Islam video on YouTube. Eventually the administration acknowledged it was a terrorist attack."

    I watched "Four Lions" again and wondered why nobody protested that film? I think they don't get the joke and they love the way Jihadis are depicted in it.

  • manymanyao

    You have to develop your own judgement, not swayed by mainstream media says, or government says. Mainstream media is gone more than 5 years ago, and act like the communist medias: They only report what government order. By the way before you vote for this guy, from now on, check all the magazines, and TV stations, and listen to whenever every media say about something in one voice. then one or two others say something different than the rest, listen both and research and try to figure out what is their hidden intentions and motivation. Weight carefully each other. That's what smart people do. If anyone carefully do that, sooner or later they will start to see who is lying and who is truthful or neutral. As an example, CNN, FOX, MSNBC always watch all three and compare how they report about any same incident. Then you will start to see who are more neutral and who are more indoctrinated.
I was shocked how Americans were turned out to be stupid 4 years ago!.I love this nation and from bottom of my heart I wish the best for next four years. By the way, communist always say they share equally? look at the history carefully. Usually poor, radical people deceive people to turn into communist killing educated, riches _( Soviet killed 80million. Chinese killed 90 million), then only the few party members have wealth and power , The rest have no freedom of speech, wealth,religion, but living in dirt poor, worse than before. They never share equally America!. It's just shift of power form have to have-not, but to the few party members only. America Wake! Learn the history, don't be deceived. Socialist's philosophy are same as communist. Coran teaches" If infidels ( Christians and Jews) refuse to be a islam, kill them and deceive them with lies as tactics. If you don't believe me, read Coran-English. Communist and Islams' common tacts: Lies to the enemy!. America Wake up!
    by the way do you know we can't post in the internet without revealing who we are? where is the freedom? what happened to the constitutional rights for individual privacy?
    Several liberal bosses are controlling the whole media opinions, that why every media say the same thing except just few. Do you know mr O systematically hires net bloggers & using Facebook & twitters to control public opinion? Who will open their eyes and wake up before too late? my comments are disappearing from the most web site. How about yours? website dealing "Bengazy: bengjazi, bengazi attack…." all related websites are disappearing from this afternoon.
    Also mainstream media drops my comments.

  • atthebeach

    Meantime; has anyone 'heard/seen/read per the 'who' of the survivors and exact number? (Read different estimates; but 'thirty' is most oft quoted. Or 'around' thirty?) Have googled; but only a few comments disclosed by 'Staff'; and appears nothing substantial forthcoming; with regard to 'on scene' accounts. (A detailed 'report' from a Guard; whose account certainly appears to accurately, share the terror; but beyond that; have doubts about the accuracy of 'full details'. For all we know, of course; Leon could have written it.)

    Have these survivors/witnesses, been 'silenced' until 'the Investigation(not) plays out – or what? That could take a very long time. . . One might reasonably think; these people are 'free to speak' and that by now; at least someone, might be ready to share their experience; openly; honestly; offcially; legally. . .and totally.

  • Jessica

    All you idiots need to stop arguing with each other. It is very off-putting. Get a life and start discussing issues calmly and rationally you bunch of liberals.

    • nothankyou

      LOL the Administrator of free speech huh? what a joke this sight is

      FLY high little eagle.

      Anybody that reads this sites stuff is a fool! If you don't get the meaning of my words……….who cares I neither have the time or the patience to spell it out for you.

      To who wrote this story……..simple you're a sellout just another person selling out his country.

  • bible thumper

    Obama had for knowledge of the entire event. That is a fact. Lets not sugar coat this.

  • Bash Brannigan

    This administration lies like a 5-year-old. That’s the transparency. And Mommy and Daddy electorate just says, “Uh-huh, okay, but we know the truth…” The problem is that Obama and Jarrett can do far more damage the average kindergatener.