‘Nonviolence’ Explodes in Chicago

Pages: 1 2

Authorities said the activities of Senakiewicz and Neiweem were unrelated to another bombing plot involving President Obama’s Chicago-based reelection campaign headquarters.

Three self-described anarchists were arrested Saturday after traveling from Florida to Chicago and allegedly plotting to attack Obama campaign offices, the home of Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel, and police stations. Molotov cocktails were allegedly involved.

The men have been identified as Brian Church, 22, of Fort Lauderdale; Jared Chase, 27, of Keene, N.H.; and Brent Betterly, 24, address unknown.

Their lawyers claim the accused men were patsies set up by authorities. “This is just propaganda to create a climate of fear,” defense attorney Michael Duetsch huffed.

Last week demonstrators led a “F*** the Police” protest action in Chicagoland as mask-wearing activists in black clothing carried communist and anarchist flags in hopes of winning the hearts and minds of Middle America. Leftists and union goons terrorized entire neighborhoods, provoking fisticuffs, creating makeshift barricades, dragging dumpsters into the streets, and upending garbage cans.

Less than a month ago several radicals were arrested in Cleveland after plotting to blow up a busy bridge over the Cuyahoga Valley National Park. Self-described anarchists Douglas L. Wright, 26, Brandon L. Baxter, 20, and Anthony Hayne, 35, were charged with conspiracy and attempted use of explosive materials to damage physical property affecting interstate commerce. The other two plotters, Connor C. Stevens, 20, and Joshua S. Stafford, 23, were arrested and charged with similar crimes but were not identified as anarchists.

Wright and Baxter reportedly told an FBI informant that taking out a bridge would cause great financial distress. “Taking out a bridge in the business district would cost the … corporate big wigs a lot of money,” Baxter was quoted saying. The duo also talked about blowing up the NATO summit in Chicago, the upcoming Republican convention in Tampa, Florida, and a Cleveland casino, according to authorities.

Wright reportedly said previously that anarchists across the nation would eventually be “rioting and destroying” both Cleveland and Chicago. Cleveland would be reduced to “a pile of rubble and ashes” and Chicago would experience even more chaos, he was quoted saying.

None of this surprises Brandon Darby.

“On the Right we call out our crazies and marginalize them but on the Left they rally around them, attacking law enforcement and launching spin campaigns and doing everything they can to deify and humanize the perpetrator and to minimize the crime.”

“Maybe if the Left would stop defending such crazy actions … then we’d stop seeing such violent atrocities from their ranks,” Darby said.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Pages: 1 2

  • truebearing

    Gee, I guess Glenn Beck was right. I'm sure the media will line up and apologize to him any day now.

    Hmmmmm, why would the administration choose Chicago for this summit? They know Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn are there, waiting to stir up violence. They know what Occupy communists are capable of. They support them. So why Chicago? is it a gift to good, old Rahm? Or is it just a great place for political theater?

    • clarespark

      And guess what Harvard Business Review is circulating as a legitimate blog, by none other than Peter Bregman, global business consultant, to get men in touch with their feelings: See http://clarespark.com/2012/05/20/kick-me-again/,

  • H&R_ Barack

    "‘Nonviolence’ Explodes in Chicago " what wry irony. Great quip.

    Just another Saturday night in Chicago –
    " Who will march for justice for Timothy Scott? Or the ten victims of gun violence last weekend in Chicago? Or the dozens of other dead people killed around the country in random and not so random shootings? Each death every bit the monumental loss for that family as for the family of young Mr. Martin. Each killing wracking the neighborhood and community where the dead lay as the pain caused by Mr. Martin's death in Sanford, FL.

    Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/03/just_… ~ American Thinker

  • H&R_ Barack

    Occupy 99% of a bar of (Irish) "Spring" bath soap!

    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

      With this crowd that might not be safe.
      You just don't know where that bar of soap has been.

  • Rocky Mountain

    “aggravated assault to a police officer,” This is a misdemeanor? What state could this possibly be?

  • Schlomotion

    Matt Vadum has joined the ranks of Alex Jones and Bob Avakian in falsely placing tiny, inconsequential scuffles under a magnifying glass to spin them into civilization shaking rebellions.

    • Atlas_Collins

      You have a point, Schlomo. The whole "protest" thingie by these inconsequential and smelly wannabe hippies is nothing more than a great big Dud with a capital "D."

      I am laughing so hard at the leftist vermin that I can't even bother to spit on them.

    • Ghostwriter

      Imbecility,thy name is Schlomotion.

  • Mother Jones

    Such garbage! Thousands gather peacefully to protest war and austerity and Frontpage focuses on the provocateurs. Apologizing for power must be very profitable. Stop lying!

    • BS77

      OHHHHH….MOther Jones, that dreadful left wing bird cage liner from the sixties? That propaganda rag from discontented grumpy old communists and anarchists? Surely you jest………"Thousands gather peacefully"….that is funny…..Take a long walk on a short pier.

      • flyingtiger

        The only time Mother Jones magazine was good was when Michael Moore ran it. They made a point to get rid of him real fast.

    • Stephen_Brady

      I've inadvertently walked through a time portal, and it's January, 1969. Vietnam has become "Nixon's War", and Mother Jones is being used by smelly hippies as toilet paper, all over the US.

      Get a job, "Mother" …

    • Rifleman

      What austerity? Entitlement and welfare spending are at record levels. How does one peacefully douse the police with urine? Don't try to blame us for your friends.

    • Asher

      People recognize Tyranny when they see it, how utterly dispicable that the next generation is summoned to represent tyranny and violence instead of being responsible productive people!

  • mrbean

    There is nothing like the sweet sounds of the loud cracks of the CPD nightsticks on the skulls of useful idiots in the early evening on a Chicago street.

    • Iron Yank

      Might knock some sense into them…….. na just kiddin. Its times like this that A guy wishes he was a cop

      • Elmo Lewis

        Fascists celebrating violence. You always find them on Frontpage!

  • BLJ

    The should round up these anarchist losers and deport their butts out of the U.S. They serve no purpose in our society and contribute nothing of positive value. They want to live on the backs of others and even that isn't enough to satisfy them.

    • Questions

      How does one deport U.S. citizens? Much as I can't stand the "anti-racists" (read: anti-whites), they're still Americans.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

    Isn't this exactly the kind of thing Obama used to 'organize' before he became part of the system?

    • Jim_C

      Um, no.

      • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

        Wasn't he a community organizer with Ayers as his buddy?

        • BLJ

          Obama and his supporters will deny any relationship he has with Ayers and his old lady. The facts state otherwise. Obama's past is about as shady as it gets.

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            Facts are so inconvenient that way.

          • Alinsky USA HERO

            What about the fact that Reagan was a New Deal democrat in 1948, even though you lie and say he was a conservative?

            F u c k i n g liar!! You have never known a fact in your life. Nor what sex with a girl feels like.

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            Did he also fly ufo's into area 51?

          • Alinsky USA HERO

            No.

            So you are wrong and exposed as a liar.

            You are the perfect example of a conservative pathological liar that will not use facts and will use dishonest methods to support your racist agenda.

            And you made the claim that Reagan was a conservative in 1948 and refuse to show any facts supporting your claims.

            this is why I know you have neber had sex with a girl. Men who have had relationships with girlfriends growing up learn how to debate like men.

            You debate and lie like a little boy. You have arrested development.

            That the reason Cowboy Logic doesn't want you making comments on Navy's site. And it's why your older brother thinks you are a homo.

            I guess you have to work hard to pretend you are not in his eyes.

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            Make up all you want. You have not shown Reagan was proud of the new deal and enjoyed participating in it.

            Reagan was a conservative democrat in 1948 before the party swerved to the left and 'left him behind'. It was the swerve to the left that made him join the republicans.

            And in 1948 FDR was dead and so was the new deal.

            I guess you have to work hard to pretend any relevance.

          • Alinsky USA HERO

            How do you know Reagan agreed with any changes to the New Deal in 1948. WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE??? WHAT HAVE YOU READ???

            In fact, if you listen to his campaign speeches for Hubert Humphrey (one of the most liberal New Deal Democrats in history) Reagan is ANGRY with the Republican attempts to make the New Deal more conservative.

            Then Reagan fought hard for and won FREE medical care for his UNION members shortly after 1948.

            So EVERYTHING on historical record completely CONTRADICTS your opinions and conjecture about what you think Reagan believed about the New Deal in 1948.

            And you refuse to give any quotes or facts to back up your opinions.

            You are a phoney. You are lying. You are the typical conservative that refuses to tell the truth, You are intellectually dishonest. You are a child.

            You embarrass yourself and other conservatives. That is why Cowboy Logic doesn't want you commenting on Navy's site.

            If you had ever been in a relationship ,with a woman, you might have outgrown your child-like debating tactics.

            You have arrested development, and are pathologically unable to accept it, even though just about EVERYBODY tells you the same thing.

            The closest you ever had to a friend was WeeTodd, and he hated you. Now that he is gone, you only have your stuffed Rat Ralph.

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            There was no new deal in 1948. The war stopped it and with the death of FDR it was over.

          • Alinsky USA HERO

            That is a lie!!

            New Deal programs were very much in place and still working. We still have Social Security and Dwight D. Eisenhower left the New Deal largely intact. LBJ added even MORE programs to the New Deal.

            You are lying.

            You are a pathological liar.

            And EVEN if the New Deal was over in 1948, you STILL have shown that Reagan agreed with that. His quotes all contradict your claim.

            Refusing to admit you lied and are wrong, doesn't mean you don't lose. You LOST.

            Closing your eyes doesn't mean other can't see you. They can SEE you.

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            You're showing how little you know.
            During the war all industrial output went into the war effort. People padded shoes with newspaper and cardboard, cars got jacked up for a lack of tires, it all went to the troops.

            Every able bodied man went and fought. FDR was dead, and it took only months for states to pass a constitutional amendment making sure he didn't happen again.

            After the war the GI bill allowed college education and the video you showed of Reagan was during that time. The republicans got elected and squandered it, that's what Reagan was mad about.

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            You're showing how little you know.
            They passed a constitutional amendment to keep another FDR from happening.

            I have not shown that Reagan agreed with any of it. http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/r/ronal

          • Alinsky USA HERO

            Those quotes are NOT from 1948. I said it a HUNDRED times…ypu have to show he disagreed with the New Deal being in decline in 1948.

            you are lying again. you are exposed again.

            Why won't you debate honestly??

            Because you know you are lying.

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            And you can't show otherwise even in 1948.You can show that he didn't like the republicans wasting the time in office and not moving to stop inflation.You still lose. Want to rewrite some more?

          • Alinsky USA HERO

            He is making speeches for New Deal polices and didn't like Republicans wasting time with policies that were against the New Deal.

            That is proof.

            You on the other hand have not provided ANYTHING but your conjectures about what Reagan might have thought, even though there is nothing indicating he thought it.

            You are still trapped in your lie. try harder.

  • Jim_C

    You guys want SO BADLY for there to be violence and mayhem. But, awww, you're barely getting any!

    And when you do get some, it seems the perp wanted to go after Obama! Well, that just won't do! Obama's supposed to be the radical leftist puppetmaster! Why would they want to go after him? (Or, wait, that's Soros…)

    "Maybe they should protest blah blah blah…instead of blah blah blah." Who cares? I think these protests are silly enough without actually wishing things would come to harm. What the hell?

    • BLJ

      Sorry to burst your bubble there Jimbo, but no rational person wants to see any violence. I have no problem with people protesting peacefully. The anarchists who have showed up are looking for trouble and they deserve any police beat down that may come their way.

      BTW, how much is Soros paying you to post here?

      • Jim_C

        I actually agree with you.

        And…I'm stationed on Papa George's yacht right now off the shore of Lake Michigan. In between mimosas I detail marching orders to my minions.

  • mrbean

    I see we have a new version of winter soldiers marching uniform who throw their medals away in Chicago as part of the useful idiot riff raff. DoD should take their photos and if they have not completed their inactive reserve issue them all dishonorable discharges and allow the media to publish their namesunder the FOIA.

  • tagalog

    The MSM and Fox News have shown extensive film of the confrontation(s) between the Chicago PD and the demonstrators. There doesn't seem to have been a hell of a lot of violence, some sticks and stones thrown, a couple of people beaned with nightsticks, a few arrests for what seems to have been mostly obstreperous acting-out, and that seems to be it.

    I don't think the protests can exactly be called "peaceful," but I wouldn't exactly call what happened all that far out, just some kids (and some adults who should know better) being resistive to authority. The bottom line is that when the cops advanced the kids backed up. Nobody needed tear gas, no Illinois National Guard were visible, there were no rifles with fixed bayonets, no jeeps outfitted with frameworks of barbed wire, no arrest centers on public lawns, nothing like that. Mayor Daley would have called both sides a couple of pussies.

  • Ghostwriter

    Beatings,shootings,destruction of property. That was the OWS people seem to thrive on and fools like Jim_C seem to encourage such things.

    • trickyblain

      How has Jim C encouraged "such things"?

  • wctaqiyya

    From watching hours of live Ustream videos, I saw several motley groups of maybe a few dozen to perhaps a hundred mostly young people hiking aimlessly around Chicago. Sometimes they would chant about who's street it was, sometimes a few of them yelled 'no justice, no peace' at perplexed security guards. Most of the time, they were polite. Like when they hushed each other while hiking past a hospital or when asking a cop for directions. And they asked for directions a lot. Nobody had a map. Or a plan. Or a clue. No, they sort of had a plan, they were always asking each other, 'where are all the other guys?' Sure, a few were arrested, but the cops have bosses and the bosses have to justify overtime. Invariably, if they saw more than one or two cops in the street, they would immediately decide to hike in another direction. So, while the OWS children can be scary. The ones in Chicago this week-end weren't. Mr. Vadum, please take a chill pill and call me when something really exciting happens. Yawn.

  • Alinsky USA HERO

    But the question is Reagan's frame of mind in 1948.

    Why do you believe Reagan liked that the New Deal was not in existence after the war as you claim it is.

    I notice you are trying to shift the debate away from what Reagan thought of the New Deal in 1948 to an argument about whether the New Deal existed after the war.

    You must be using distraction tactic like that because you know you lied and are being exposed for it.

    Lets not let you re frame the debate just because you are trapped in a corner.

    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

      I have explained his frame of mind.
      Facts are not your friend.

      • Alinsky USA HERO

        You explained your opinion about his frame of mind, but provide nothing that back of your claim.

        So where is your proof?

        I have sited many links that say he is a liberal democrat and there is nothing on the internet that says he changed his opinion about the New Deal in 1948.

        You are a pathological liar, and a great example of the evil of conservatives. you go by emotion and opinion instead of logic and facts.

        • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

          Everything backs it.

          • Alinsky USA HERO

            No, there is nothing that backs your opinion that Reagan changed his mind about the New Deal in 1948.

            You made it up based on what you WANT to believe.

            Pathological liar, you have been exposed.

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            There is nothing to suggest there was a new deal in 1948.

          • Alinsky USA HERO

            That is not the argument. You are just avoiding the issue and trying to create a distraction by changing the argument because you have nothing to back up your lie.

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            It is the false premise of your argument.

            The new deal was dead as they shifted funding to the war effort.

          • Alinsky USA HERO

            Reagan is quoted in this conservative article that he believed in big government AFTER the war and supported New Deal big government AFTER the war.

            You still have not provided anything except what you WANT to believe. You never site anything that shows Reagan didn't believe in big government in 1948.

            http://www.firstprinciplesjournal.com/articles.as

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            You're quoting a liberal college professor?

            That's it?

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            Did the little pink ponies dancing in your head say so, or did you find another liberal college teacher that made it up for you?

          • Alinsky USA HERO

            You went to Desert College, so you have no basis to dismiss these facts.

            Rovian tactic aren't helping you.

            You can't dismiss the facts with lame insults.

            You must offer something but lies and distraction tactics. But you don't have anything. You will do anything to distract because you are caught in a lie.

            I gave you an actual Reagan quote proving you wee wrong. All you have ids your tiny dick in your hand.

            Exposed as a pathological liar.

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            This from a paid iranian hack.

            It's not rovian, it's true.

            And you should know that college professors in the US are known for their liberal elite leanings.

          • Alinsky USA HERO

            Why do you ignore the quote by Ronald Reagan that contradicts the lies you told?

            It is interesting to watch how pathological liars like yourself try to deal with being exposed.

            Your older brother must have beat the living s h i t out of you everyday when you were young.

            Desert Collage must be for head injury students.

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            Still pretending you had a quote by Reagan saying he wanted big government stealing our freedoms and opportunities?

            My big brother would mop up the floor with you, luckily for you, I just prefer to rip you to shreds verbally.

          • Alinsky USA HERO

            Ronald Reagan –

            "I thought government could solve all our postwar problems just as it had ended the Depression and won the war. I didn’t trust big business. I thought government, not private companies, should own our big public utilities; if there wasn’t enough housing to shelter the American people, I thought government should build it; if we needed better medical care, the answer was socialized medicine.”

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            The problem is that government didn't solve the depression, it didn't do any of those things.

            You're 'quote' is fictional and doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

            Let's listen to Reagan himself instead of your pretend quote.
            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fRdLpem-AAs

          • Alinsky USA HERO

            Why do you say the qoute is ficticinal. You have some proof, or are you just making up things as you go along.

            You are lying. Jesus would not have lied like you.

            I hope your lies are worth it, because you are going to hell instead of being honest.

            Your youtube link was from 1961 and doesn't adress his thought s in 1948.

            Your brother would beat the s h i t out of you for lying like this.

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            And didn't you know Reagan said this in 1947?

            "When trolls quote me on the internet and make things up don't believe them."

          • Alinsky USA HERO

            You seem mentally unstable. Your insults don't make the quote any less real. I have backed up my facts. You refuse to do so.

            What a fool you are making of yourself, and you are lying uner the watchful eyes of Jesus, aren't you?

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            You advocate violent revolution.Why should I take you seriously?You brag about smoking a lot, a lot of medical canibus. So, why should I take you seriously again?

          • Alinsky USA HERO

            Are you going to start crying and insulting just because you have nothing to stand on and have been exposed as a liar?

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            Are you going to call for more beheadings?

          • Alinsky USA HERO

            You are not facinbg the issue on purpose, because you have been exposed.

          • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

            You pretend that a fake new deal in 1948 was important.You pretend a lot of things. Why should I take anything you say seriously?Did you take both hands off your bong?

  • Schlomotion

    You're so right. That's why when Irv Rubin, the Jewish Nationalist of the Kach Party and the JDL tried to plant pipe bombs in the USA he got sent to jail.

  • Joe

    He got sent to jail or was awaiting trial. What is the problem? It is a problem when we try to send your brethren to jail for the same thing.

    then they & you squeal like a stuck pig.

  • Schlomotion

    No. I think all pipe bombers should go to jail, but this thing in Chicago still didn't add up to a big deal.

  • Schlomotion

    Everybody wants to bomb something. Let's not exaggerate all this "talking" into a leftist conspiracy.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

    No, not everyone wants to bomb anything.

  • Choi

    NO!,you $$WHOLE,
    Everybody does NOT want to bomb something,you LEFTY POS!

  • Schlomotion

    You're right I suppose. The No-Libido-Crew just wants to butt into conversations and make mother jokes. You got that covered.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

    You do realize that the threads here are designed for people to 'butt in' and make a point?

    If you can say he's wrong then explain why. If you can't' show he's wrong then you deserve to be put in your place.

  • Schlomotion

    I already said where he is wrong. He spun a non-event into a national insurrection. That's wrong.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

    By your own standard I could say you're a dodo bird and the burden of proof would be on you to prove otherwise.

  • Schlomotion

    And that might have been relevant in 1681 when there were still hungry sailors.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

    And your standards here today aren't relevant either.

  • Schlomotion

    Stop lying. You know you want to bomb some leftist infoshop.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

    Projecting much?