<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feminists for Rape</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=feminists-for-rape</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 00:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: whiskas</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-5312379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[whiskas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-5312379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone should write a book with the genders reversed. Imagine the outrage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone should write a book with the genders reversed. Imagine the outrage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghostwriter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-4054086</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghostwriter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-4054086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While there are women who are feminists who don&#039;t hate men,there are those who do and they are probably regarded by the more sane members of the movement as nutjobs. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While there are women who are feminists who don&#039;t hate men,there are those who do and they are probably regarded by the more sane members of the movement as nutjobs. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @paulvmarks</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-4053060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[@paulvmarks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-4053060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see - many thanks. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see &#8211; many thanks. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyciol</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-4051771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tyciol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-4051771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right, because we should judge the entire left based on feminism? =/ ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, because we should judge the entire left based on feminism? =/ </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyciol</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-4051766</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tyciol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-4051766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;As a libertarian, I am also, of course, a feminist&quot; 
 
Libertarians have to be feminist now? Wow. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;As a libertarian, I am also, of course, a feminist&quot; </p>
<p>Libertarians have to be feminist now? Wow. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyciol</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-4051761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tyciol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 07:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-4051761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny how feminists will endorse this woman revenge-sodomizing a guy for raping her, but if a man were to revenge-rape a woman to punish her for raping him before, they would probably protest that. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny how feminists will endorse this woman revenge-sodomizing a guy for raping her, but if a man were to revenge-rape a woman to punish her for raping him before, they would probably protest that. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-4050728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary Sue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-4050728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[except that isn&#039;t exactly what that means. 
 
The Feminist Version would punish a person that had NOTHING to do with the original wrong. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>except that isn&#039;t exactly what that means. </p>
<p>The Feminist Version would punish a person that had NOTHING to do with the original wrong. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-4050721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary Sue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 01:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-4050721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those brainwashed/braindead 18 year olds have Rachel Corrie Syndrome. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those brainwashed/braindead 18 year olds have Rachel Corrie Syndrome. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karrah</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-4050482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karrah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 23:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-4050482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[upto I looked at the bank draft of $7260, I did not believe ...that...my brother could actually receiving money part-time from there computar.. there sisters neighbour haz done this for under eight months and at present took care of the morgage on there villa and bourt a brand new Nissan GT-R:. I went here,........ BIT40.ℂOℳ ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>upto I looked at the bank draft of $7260, I did not believe &#8230;that&#8230;my brother could actually receiving money part-time from there computar.. there sisters neighbour haz done this for under eight months and at present took care of the morgage on there villa and bourt a brand new Nissan GT-R:. I went here,&#8230;&#8230;.. BIT40.ℂOℳ </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glennd1</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-4050267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glennd1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-4050267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve seen all three movies, but turned off the American re-make of the first because it was so awful. Christopher Hitchens did a very interesting review of the trilogy after Larsson&#039;s death - I think he&#039;s spot on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2009/12/hitchens-200912&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2009/1...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
My takeaway from the movies is that this is feminism run amok. It&#039;s not just the permissive morality that Lisbet is granted - vengeance equalling justice only for female victims of abuse - it&#039;s the portrayal of men in the book. The reporter, who seems modeled after Larsson who declared himself a &quot;feminist&quot; publicly, is singularly dull and overly restrained and stunted emotionally. Even the hero has to be a bum. As literature it&#039;s also not any great shakes. One has to really go along way to grant Lisbet all her super skills that she possesses.  
 
The rest of the men are truly monsters. Okay, as art fine, you want to create this warped world, okay, but then I&#039;m forced to try and take the &quot;message&quot; seriously. And the message is simple. Vengeance is good. Female vengeance against males is something to take great pleasure in. Women are tough. That&#039;s it. There is not greater societal context because Larsson doesn&#039;t deign to ground his story in any society that I recognize as real. It isn&#039;t metaphor for anyhing, it&#039;s far to direct and action packed to carry any such subtlety. 
 
I think Larsson is just one of many &quot;artists&quot; the Progressives crown based on a political-identity basis versus actual talent, like a Danish David Sedaris, who&#039;s popularity certainly cannot be based on his skills as a storyteller. Larrson was a self-hating man who played to feminist-supremacists fetishes and fantasies. He&#039;s welcome to it, but don&#039;t call it art.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve seen all three movies, but turned off the American re-make of the first because it was so awful. Christopher Hitchens did a very interesting review of the trilogy after Larsson&#039;s death &#8211; I think he&#039;s spot on <a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2009/12/hitchens-200912" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2009/1" rel="nofollow">http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2009/1</a>&#8230; </p>
<p>My takeaway from the movies is that this is feminism run amok. It&#039;s not just the permissive morality that Lisbet is granted &#8211; vengeance equalling justice only for female victims of abuse &#8211; it&#039;s the portrayal of men in the book. The reporter, who seems modeled after Larsson who declared himself a &quot;feminist&quot; publicly, is singularly dull and overly restrained and stunted emotionally. Even the hero has to be a bum. As literature it&#039;s also not any great shakes. One has to really go along way to grant Lisbet all her super skills that she possesses.  </p>
<p>The rest of the men are truly monsters. Okay, as art fine, you want to create this warped world, okay, but then I&#039;m forced to try and take the &quot;message&quot; seriously. And the message is simple. Vengeance is good. Female vengeance against males is something to take great pleasure in. Women are tough. That&#039;s it. There is not greater societal context because Larsson doesn&#039;t deign to ground his story in any society that I recognize as real. It isn&#039;t metaphor for anyhing, it&#039;s far to direct and action packed to carry any such subtlety. </p>
<p>I think Larsson is just one of many &quot;artists&quot; the Progressives crown based on a political-identity basis versus actual talent, like a Danish David Sedaris, who&#039;s popularity certainly cannot be based on his skills as a storyteller. Larrson was a self-hating man who played to feminist-supremacists fetishes and fantasies. He&#039;s welcome to it, but don&#039;t call it art.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LibertarianToo</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-4050264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LibertarianToo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-4050264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exactly. The punishment should be proportional to the crime. Or in the biblical example, exactly identical to the crime: An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a life for a life. If poking out someone&#039;s eye is wrong, then poking out someone else&#039;s eye is wrong. Ergo, two wrongs make a right --at least according to the bible. And Moses. And the Author of the Law.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. The punishment should be proportional to the crime. Or in the biblical example, exactly identical to the crime: An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a life for a life. If poking out someone&#039;s eye is wrong, then poking out someone else&#039;s eye is wrong. Ergo, two wrongs make a right &#8211;at least according to the bible. And Moses. And the Author of the Law.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-4049870</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 20:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-4049870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just commenting on your biblical reference: no, the biblical eye-for-an-eye is not an advocate of the &quot;two wrongs make a right theory&quot;. That is completely misinterpreted these days. The biblical injunction&#039;s intent is that the punishment should be in proportion to the offense. This was in the days when absolute monarchs could have your head lopped off for accidentally insulting the queen, or other such trivial offenses. People take &quot;eye for an eye&quot; for granted these days because it has been so many centuries since those times. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just commenting on your biblical reference: no, the biblical eye-for-an-eye is not an advocate of the &quot;two wrongs make a right theory&quot;. That is completely misinterpreted these days. The biblical injunction&#039;s intent is that the punishment should be in proportion to the offense. This was in the days when absolute monarchs could have your head lopped off for accidentally insulting the queen, or other such trivial offenses. People take &quot;eye for an eye&quot; for granted these days because it has been so many centuries since those times. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: garretso</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-4049531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[garretso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-4049531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lets not forget that it is all a work of fiction - one man&#039;s fantasy (of how horrible men are and how heroic women are). Let us also remember that Stieg Larsson left the fortune he earned from this violence exploitation trilogy to his brothers - not his fellow feminist female life partner.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets not forget that it is all a work of fiction &#8211; one man&#039;s fantasy (of how horrible men are and how heroic women are). Let us also remember that Stieg Larsson left the fortune he earned from this violence exploitation trilogy to his brothers &#8211; not his fellow feminist female life partner.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tagalog</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-4049392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tagalog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-4049392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bjurman is Salander&#039;s court-appointed conservator because Salander has (before the novels begin) been adjudicated to be mentally incompetent because she won&#039;t talk to anyone, and is held to be in need of someone to manage her financial affairs.  That&#039;s explained in the novels. 
 
Lots of people, including me, have some degree of sympathy with some kinds of revenge.  That&#039;s why there are so many novels and thrillers with revenge themes; people like them.  But revenge is NEVER claimed, fictionally or in reality, to be particularly moral.  It&#039;s just payback. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bjurman is Salander&#039;s court-appointed conservator because Salander has (before the novels begin) been adjudicated to be mentally incompetent because she won&#039;t talk to anyone, and is held to be in need of someone to manage her financial affairs.  That&#039;s explained in the novels. </p>
<p>Lots of people, including me, have some degree of sympathy with some kinds of revenge.  That&#039;s why there are so many novels and thrillers with revenge themes; people like them.  But revenge is NEVER claimed, fictionally or in reality, to be particularly moral.  It&#039;s just payback. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tagalog</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-4049379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tagalog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-4049379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good revenge movie, a favorite:  Payback with Mel Gibson.  Love it. 
 
&quot;Got a light?&quot;  
 
&quot;No?&quot; 
 
&quot;Then what good are you?&quot; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good revenge movie, a favorite:  Payback with Mel Gibson.  Love it. </p>
<p>&quot;Got a light?&quot;  </p>
<p>&quot;No?&quot; </p>
<p>&quot;Then what good are you?&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tagalog</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-4049361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tagalog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-4049361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the books, Salander is a computer genius, and makes money off the books, i.e., illegally and without paying taxes, doing private computer-based investigative work. That investigative work is the springboard from which she enters the action of Larsson&#039;s trilogy.  
 
As in all thriller novels, such work pays the fictional hero(ine) far more than it would in reality. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the books, Salander is a computer genius, and makes money off the books, i.e., illegally and without paying taxes, doing private computer-based investigative work. That investigative work is the springboard from which she enters the action of Larsson&#039;s trilogy.  </p>
<p>As in all thriller novels, such work pays the fictional hero(ine) far more than it would in reality. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tagalog</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-4049296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tagalog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-4049296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#039;re living at present in a time when Hollywood and novels extol violence by blacks against whites, by women against men, and vigilantism in general. 
 
When the violence is perpetrated by women against men or by blacks against whites, it&#039;s treated with tolerance.  &quot;After all, they&#039;ve experienced so much mistreatment, it&#039;s understandable.&quot; 
 
The fact that ideologically-based violence eliminates the moral legitimacy of their position vis-a-vis their mistreatment seems to have been forgotten. 
 
And, of course, black-on-white, female-on-male violence can easily be transformed into white-on-black, men-on-women violence, and the objection to such violence has no moral force. 
 
I miss the days when we lived in a civilized society.  We&#039;ve become so degraded it&#039;s no wonder we hear weekly about some lunatic shooting up his surroundings and killing a bunch of innocent people. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#039;re living at present in a time when Hollywood and novels extol violence by blacks against whites, by women against men, and vigilantism in general. </p>
<p>When the violence is perpetrated by women against men or by blacks against whites, it&#039;s treated with tolerance.  &quot;After all, they&#039;ve experienced so much mistreatment, it&#039;s understandable.&quot; </p>
<p>The fact that ideologically-based violence eliminates the moral legitimacy of their position vis-a-vis their mistreatment seems to have been forgotten. </p>
<p>And, of course, black-on-white, female-on-male violence can easily be transformed into white-on-black, men-on-women violence, and the objection to such violence has no moral force. </p>
<p>I miss the days when we lived in a civilized society.  We&#039;ve become so degraded it&#039;s no wonder we hear weekly about some lunatic shooting up his surroundings and killing a bunch of innocent people. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LibertarianToo</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-4049118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LibertarianToo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-4049118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I admit I haven&#039;t read the books. I did see the movie of the first one, and the &quot;welfare checks&quot; were nothing of the kind- they were some kind of trust fund disbursments, of which Salander&#039;s assailant was the executor or something. Maybe in the book they were &quot;welfare checks&quot;  though why Bjurman would control welfare checks escapes me. 
 
Excuse me, but I believe that there are many, many people who believe that &quot;turnaround is fair play&quot; and plenty more who believe that revenge and justice have a lot in common. I am reminded of brief interviews with family members of some victims of the Khmer Rouge, who were describing in lurid detail just what should be done to members of Pol Pot&#039;s regime (skinning alive was one suggestion.) I have also seen footage of a group of emaciated concentration camp inmates, just liberated, who proceeded to beat to death one of their former guards. Self-defense? Not exactly, but certainly understandable. I suspect victims of violent assaults often daydream of revenge. 
 
As for the contention that &quot;vigilantism does not work in fiction&quot; -Larsson&#039;s books were runaway bestsellers. Must have struck a responsive chord somewhere. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit I haven&#039;t read the books. I did see the movie of the first one, and the &quot;welfare checks&quot; were nothing of the kind- they were some kind of trust fund disbursments, of which Salander&#039;s assailant was the executor or something. Maybe in the book they were &quot;welfare checks&quot;  though why Bjurman would control welfare checks escapes me. </p>
<p>Excuse me, but I believe that there are many, many people who believe that &quot;turnaround is fair play&quot; and plenty more who believe that revenge and justice have a lot in common. I am reminded of brief interviews with family members of some victims of the Khmer Rouge, who were describing in lurid detail just what should be done to members of Pol Pot&#039;s regime (skinning alive was one suggestion.) I have also seen footage of a group of emaciated concentration camp inmates, just liberated, who proceeded to beat to death one of their former guards. Self-defense? Not exactly, but certainly understandable. I suspect victims of violent assaults often daydream of revenge. </p>
<p>As for the contention that &quot;vigilantism does not work in fiction&quot; -Larsson&#039;s books were runaway bestsellers. Must have struck a responsive chord somewhere. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LibertarianToo</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-4049038</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LibertarianToo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-4049038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a libertarian, I am also, of course, a feminist, and strongly pro-Israel. I will not be supporting Hamas et al any time soon, and I&#039;m wondering why you think a belief in equality before the law implies support for Jihadi savages. 
 
Incidentally, something else that relies on the &quot;two wrongs make a right&quot; theory is the biblical eye-for-an-eye approach to justice. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a libertarian, I am also, of course, a feminist, and strongly pro-Israel. I will not be supporting Hamas et al any time soon, and I&#039;m wondering why you think a belief in equality before the law implies support for Jihadi savages. </p>
<p>Incidentally, something else that relies on the &quot;two wrongs make a right&quot; theory is the biblical eye-for-an-eye approach to justice. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goemon</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/mike-adams/feminists-for-rape/comment-page-1/#comment-4049033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[goemon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=170112#comment-4049033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Am I the only one here who loves the satisfaction of revenge? Good for Salander I say!  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one here who loves the satisfaction of revenge? Good for Salander I say!  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 698/719 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 20:13:47 by W3 Total Cache -->