‘Last Hope’ for Peace Fading in Syria


Pages: 1 2

The tone of the Friends of Syria meeting was decidedly grim. Sarkozy, in likening the situation in Syria to the Libyan situation before the fall of Gaddafi, accused Assad of lying. “He wants to wipe Homs off the map just like Gaddafi wanted to destroy Benghazi,” he said. “The solution,” he added, “is the establishment of humanitarian corridors so that an opposition can exist in Syria.” French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe, in lobbying for the corridors, said that the peace plan was the “last hope” before civil war broke out — a war that could spill over into neighboring countries and precipitate a regional conflict.

It is widely believed in Western military circles that any kind of a “humanitarian corridor” would require a sizable number of combat troops as well as a substantial number of aircraft to protect civilians, as well as guard the mission itself. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said that “all options are on the table,” but warned against American military involvement during a congressional hearing on Thursday saying that Washington would need “a clear legal basis” and regional support to act. That will almost certainly not be forthcoming from the UN Security Council as Russia has been adamantly opposed to a repeat of the Libyan mission and would almost certainly veto any resolution that allowed foreign troops on Syrian soil.

The Free Syrian Army has been agitating for foreign intervention for months — even without UN approval, but the civilian Syrian National Council has opposed intervention. The SNC is calling for foreign powers to arm the rebels, however, and if the peace plan falls through, more nations could potentially join some of the Gulf states who are already supplying small arms to the FSA.

What is spurring the Friends of Syria to threaten more drastic action is not just the continued shelling of cities by the Syrian army, but also the growing humanitarian crisis that now includes at least 230,000 refugees who have been forced to flee their homes, and another million Syrians who are desperately in need of food, medicine, and other aid. Part of the Annan cease fire plan called for a two hour respite in the shelling and fighting every day so that relief could be delivered. Assad’s soldiers have ignored this part of the agreement and the situation is deteriorating rapidly. Thus, there have been calls by both France and Turkey for the humanitarian corridors to allow refugees safe passage to one of the border countries — Lebanon, Turkey, or Jordan — and for supplies to alleviate the escalating suffering.

Panetta told the congressional hearing that the Pentagon was supplying $25 million in humanitarian aid and “non-lethal” assistance to the rebels. Arab League members have pledged more than $100 million in aid — much of that to pay FSA fighters — while Great Britain has pledged another 4 million pounds, bringing their contribution to over 10 million pounds.

It isn’t that there isn’t enough money to aid the Syrian people. The problem is President Assad refuses to allow the aid to reach those who most need it. With the economy in a state of near collapse, unemployment skyrocketing, high inflation, and a dearth of goods on the shelves, people are leaving their homes by the thousands and heading for refugee camps outside the country. This has put Turkey directly in Assad’s line of fire as there have been several incidents in recent days of the Syrian army firing across the border hitting Syrian civilians on Turkish soil.

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan took the extraordinary step of issuing a statement warning that he might invoke Article 5 of the NATO Charter that calls for the alliance to come to the aid of a member state if they are under attack. Invoking the article would allow NATO forces to take action against Syria without UN authorization. The chances of him doing so following a relatively insignificant border skirmish are low, but his words may alarm President Assad who believes himself invulnerable as a result of Russia and China’s veto power at the UN.

Erdogan has been an early and vociferous supporter of the corridor idea and he may act unilaterally to set up a conduit to the rebels using Turkish troops so the opposition can be supplied while helping to alleviate some of the humanitarian problems near the border.

But Turkey alone cannot address the humanitarian crisis, nor can the Friends of Syria do much at this point to stop the slaughter. If — and that’s a big if — President Assad allows hundreds of monitors into Syria, and if he begins to abide by the Annan peace plan, the UN will hold off on attempting to add additional sanctions on his regime. But realistically, no one expects Assad to comply beyond the empty promises he has already made. And once the fig leaf of a peace plan has been removed, the world community will find itself in exactly the same position it was prior to Kofi Annan’s efforts, with the same limited options, the same intransigence from Russia and China, and the same ruthless actions by Assad and his criminal military directed against the innocent as well as the growing armed insurgency against his rule.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Pages: 1 2

  • truebearing

    This is the very definition of a morass.

  • wctaqiyya

    All the hand wringing and blathering about peace-keepers and safe zones is nonsense. At best, the UN and the so-called 'Friends of Syria' are just delaying the inevitable overthrow of Bashar Assad. Turkey may be trolling for financial support now but in the end, it will continue to support the rebels with arms and supplies and safe zones. Let's just get on with the rebellion so it will finish sooner rather than later. If people want to contribute, let them. I don't want any of my tax dollars or soldiers anywhere near Syria. The Turks are close by and have the power to determine how quickly this ends. Give them diplomatic cover and get out of their way.

  • Whatsinaname

    Why are we caring about this? Another day, another war, another "humanitarian crisis" in Islamoland. Everytime the Arabs hand us an ace in the hole in the form of Arabs spending their money, ammo and manpower to kill each other off, we get all hot and bothered and jump in and save them. For what? In this case, both sides are bad: Assad and the Muslim Brotherhood which is the FSA. Let's just let them duke it out and hope that after they are all too tired and broke to cause the world trouble for a LONG time.

  • kendrick1

    The scenario is: We help the rebels with food and munitions. The rebels win! We aid them in reconstruction, and training their troops. The trained troops start killing our soldiers! They tell us to get out! We try to buy them off! We leave Rebels in power mistreating citizens! We put on our Santa Claus suit, grab a sack of taxpayer money, and head out to help the new rebels!! Me and every taxi-driver in Alabama can see that!!!

    The A-rabs have their con down to perfection!!

    This would be a good time to start pulling out of all the countries in which we have our noses and U.S. taxpayer money. Cut off the funds we give them, reinforce our defenses here at home, get busy drilling for oil and natural gas, produce more coal, and strive for more renewable energy(with no taxpayer subsidies)! To a man, all countries of the world hate us!! So I say, let them go on their own and let's take care of our own people. We are now being held hostage by the Islamists!! The following link can give you an idea of what can happen when other nations are left to their own devices!!
    http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,171

  • http://thereisnosantaclaus.blogspot.com TINSC

    Syria will survive with or without Assad. Whether it will be a better friend to the United States is all but assured. Syria will continue to be a hostile nation.

    Given that, there is no sense in the use of American military assets to assist the Syrian opposition. We've done this before in other Muslim countries only to have the same results time-after-time.

    Regardless of how much we loath the Assad regime, there is little long-term benefit to the United States of seeing the Assad regime fall.

    Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.