Mubarak Verdict Roils Egyptian Election


Pages: 1 2

To that end, Morsi is seeking a political accommodation with two of his closest challengers in last month’s preliminary election round. Morsi will meet with fourth-place finisher Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh, the former reformist Brotherhood leader, and the socialist candidate who finished third, Hamdeen Sabahi, and attempt to forge a united front in the streets in response to the verdicts. Morsi is also hoping that joining with the two former candidates will energize his campaign, putting him over the top in what is seen as a very tight race.

“Today we are all in the squares. After this presser I will go to Tahrir directly to keep the revolution going until it realizes its aims,” he said. By trying to marry the anger and fear in the street with his campaign, Morsi has a hold of a potent combination that could very well bring him victory. The major argument against Shafiq is that he will bring back the autocracy of the Mubarak era by simply being a puppet of the military. This may not be far from the truth, although the former prime minister claims independence from all factions.

But even though the former prime minister Shafiq is closely identified with Mubarak and the military council ruling Egypt, the vast silent majority of Egyptians are tired of the protests and unrest. Seeing Tahrir Square fill up again may be playing directly into Shafiq’s hands. His major argument has been that only he is capable of restoring social peace, getting the economy moving again, while at the same time, staying true to the principles of the revolution.

Not surprisingly, this plays very well with many ordinary Egyptians. Speaking of the verdict, the owner of a small leather factory, Oudo Hassan, said that Egyptians should respect the rule of law. “We should move on, and look after our own interests,” he said. Whether this translates into support for Mr. Shafiq remains to be seen. But to help the process along, Shafiq held a news conference on Sunday where he raised the specter of the Muslim Brotherhood monopolizing power and bringing Egypt back “to the dark ages”:

“I represent the civil state,” Shafiq told a news conference. “The Brotherhood represents darkness and secrecy. No one knows who they are or what they are doing. I represent dialogue and tolerance.”

“They want to monopolize power,” he said. “They don’t want to take us 30 years back, but all the way back to the dark ages.”

Shafiq also accused Morsi and the Brotherhood of wanting to move the capital of Egypt to East Jerusalem, apparently a reference to the Islamists’ long standing goal of restoring the caliphate. Morsi, of course, has said no such thing but it is an indication of how increasingly bitter the campaign is becoming.

In fact, prior to the Mubarak verdict, a backlash of sorts had been building against the Muslim Brotherhood’s attempts to dominate politics in parliament and in the street. Shafiq’s charge that the Brotherhood would “monopolize power” falls on fertile political ground as the Islamists have been overbearing in their exercise of their parliamentary mandate. And raising the prospect of sharia law being implemented could also bear fruit at the polls. It is a reminder — if any is really needed — of the ultimate goal of the Muslim Brotherhood and its Salafist allies.

So both candidates carry a lot of baggage into the runoff election with the Mubarak verdicts stirring the political pot in ways that won’t be known until after the election. Can people put aside their distrust of Ahmed Shafiq? Or will they vote for him because they fear the Brotherhood’s political/religious agenda? And can Mohamed Morsi lay those fears to rest while tying Shafiq to the Mubarak verdicts and the ancien regime?

Both candidates have their work cut out for them between now and the election.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Pages: 1 2

  • http://apollospaeks.blogtownhall.com/ ApolloSpeaks

    EGYPT IN A DEATH SPIRAL

    15 months after being forced from office by mass protests, a mutinous military and Barack Obama withdrawing support former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak was sentenced to life imprisonment Saturday by an Egyptian court for failing to stop the killing of protestors by government security forces during the Arab Spring uprising. Reports say that the ailing Mubarak protesting his innocence and crying that he served his country collapsed on his way to a prison hospital possibly from a heart attack.

    Both Mubarak and Egypt are in a death spiral. His collapse Saturday is emblematic of Egypt's fate in the post-Mubarak era. Born in 1928 just two months after the founding of the Moslem Brotherhood by radical Islamist Hassan al-Banner Mubarak's warning that the reactionary Brotherhood was the only alternative to his rule was right. Egypt now is in a rite of passage through hell led by lunatics and madmen mentally trapped in the Dark Ages at war with freedom, progress, Israel and infidels.

  • Linda Rivera

    Barack Hussein Obama slipped up and actually told the TRUTH !!!

    Obama: "My Muslim Faith" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XKGdkqfBICw

    • mlcblog

      Priceless. Thank you, Linda.

  • Linda Rivera

    Obama invited his BIG favorites, the Muslim Brotherhood, to his speech in Cairo. Behind the scenes, America worked to oust U.S. ally, MODERATE Mubarak, in order to bring to power U.S. leaders' top FAVORITES, the Muslim Brotherhod, whose stated goal is the DESTRUCTION of civilization and global Islamic conquest.

  • g_jochnowitz

    Does anybody know that Mubarak outlawed femaled genital mutilation in Egypt? Does anybody care?
    Now that he's out of power, has the practice returned?

  • Fred Dawes

    If I was living in that part of the world I would be really out of my mind hoping that Israel would free my country, but that will never happen. The fact is the Obama boys total are in support of this new jihad is a real outrage, and yes Mubarak did support the USA And would never had a plan to attack Israel, but who knows what will happen now? will the US Arm the muslims with nukes?