Jimmy Carter All Over Again

Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and author of the New York Times bestsellers The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) and The Truth About Muhammad. His latest book, Arab Winter Comes to America: The Truth About the War We're In, is now available.


Pages: 1 2

The Egyptian Government has released the names of nineteen American citizens that it intends to prosecute for their role in fomenting anti-government protests – a charge they deny. Protests from the American Government have so far been futile, met with sneers of contempt.

The echoes are unmistakable. On November 4, 1979, Iranian thugs stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and took 52 Americans hostage. Jimmy Carter’s government wrung its hands in futility for the next fourteen months, until finally the Islamic Republic released the hostages on January 20, 1981, the day Ronald Reagan took office as President of the United States.

The bitter irony in all that was that Carter had betrayed the Shah of Iran, a longtime U.S. ally, and thereby paved the way for the ascent to power of the Ayatollah Khomeini and the Iranian mullahcracy that has ruled Iran ever since. Rather than feel gratitude toward Carter, however, Khomeini viewed his abandonment of the Shah as a sign of weakness, and pressed forward with his jihad against the Great Satan.

Iran has maintained a hostile posture toward the United States ever since then, including gleeful predictions of our nation’s imminent demise. Just days ago, Iran’s Supreme Leader, the Ayatollah Khamenei, declared to an enthusiastic Tehran crowd that “in light of the realization of the divine promise by almighty God, the Zionists and the Great Satan (America) will soon be defeated….Allah’s promises will be delivered and Islam will be victorious.”

As the Iranian regime inches ever closer toward constructing nuclear weapons, as even Hillary Clinton has acknowledged it is trying to do, these words become more than just empty braggadocio and saber-rattling. The U.S. and Israel have one man to thank for the advent of a genocide-minded regime that considers them both the most implacable of enemies, is not deterred by the prospect of millions of its own people dead, and is racing toward completion of a nuclear weapon.

That man, of course, is Jimmy Carter. And from the looks of recent events, he is back in the White House.

In June 2009, when Barack Obama made his notorious appeal to the Muslim world from Cairo, he specifically stipulated that leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood be allowed to attend – despite the fact that at that time the Brotherhood was still an outlawed group. Last March, as the “Arab Spring” uprisings toppled the sclerotic and brutal regime of Hosni Mubarak, Obama hailed “the peaceful transition to democracy in both Tunisia and in Egypt.” As the regime fell, Obama exulted: “We’ve borne witness to the beginning of new chapter in the history of a great country and a longtime partner of the United States.”

At the same time, Obama signaled his willingness to open talks with the Muslim Brotherhood, and gave every indication that he would not oppose the establishment of an Islamic state in Egypt.

Now, as Egypt rushes headlong toward becoming a Sharia state and adopts a posture of increasing hostility toward the United States, Obama is scrambling to hold at bay the forces he is largely responsible for unleashing.

Pages: 1 2

  • stevefraser

    Worse.

  • Lady_Dr

    True – we really need a Ronald Reagan. But we must deal with the hand we have. SO before you vote – ask yourself 'which candidate truely understans the dangers of Islam, and which one has the courage to 'deal effectively' but means other than diplomacy, sanctions and boycotts with our enemies in Iran?

    • WildJew

      So far as I can tell, the Republican front runner hasn't a clue. Like former President George W. Bush, he believes "Islam is one of the world's great religions and the great majority of people in Islam want peace…."

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Meanwhile, the the front runner's closest competitor always carefully prefaces the word Islam with the word “radical” when talking about violent jihadists, which in deference to political correctness, he routinely mislabels as being terrorists. Thus, obviously he believes so-called terrorists are radical Islamist (another false PC multicultural term) and extremists, as just like GWB and the frontrunner, he also believes Islam is a Religion of Peace™ being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists.

        Indeed, the other night on Greta, when asked what he would do about the doctor that helped the US locate OBL being arrested by Pakistani authorities, he replied to the effect that there is a struggle between moderates and radicals over there and the US should make sure that they back the moderates. In other words, he is a bona fide loon.

        Indeed, all the Republican Party candidates for president are loons when it comes to Islam because they all get their information from the same exact source, the halls of academia of our elite colleges and universities and specifically the MESA Nostra controlled Middle East Studies Departments that have all been hijacked and co-opted by Leftists and Wahhabi Lobby petro-dollars since in the 70s.

        Thus, if knowledge of the Islamic threat is your first criteria, then be aware that all candidates are loons.

        In fact, the news medias, the political elites on both sides of the political spectrum, and the federal government are all chronically incompetent when it comes to Islam, and it is because they all get their information from the same exact source, the MESA Nostra controlled Middle East Studies Departments of our elite colleges and universities that have all been hijacked and co-opted by Leftists and Wahhabi Lobby petro-dollars since in the 70s.

        Until that monopoly is exposed for being the farce that it is and broken, don't expect anything to change in the near future.

        Now, if a politician suddenly came along and started speaking the truth about Islam publicly, he'd quickly be labeled an Islamophobe and relentlessly and ruthlessly attacked and marginalized by CAIR and their acolytes, the Left, and the media. In fact, their candidacy would probably be destroyed.

        Indeed, we need a grass roots movement similar to the Tea Party movement to marginalize Muslim Brotherhood front groups like CAIR, the Left, and the leftwing media.

        • Stephen_Brady

          OYM, I thought I would give you a link which you might find interesting, concerning the word "terrorism" :
          http://www.history.navy.mil/library/guides/terror

          We completely agree about the nature and threat posed by Islam. We still disagree about the nature and/or the definition of terrorism. I see it as a tactic in an ongoing war used to push an enemy … especially, the enemy's civilian population … towards political goals that they've set. I've seen acts of terrorism since my days in Vietnam, and politics was always the goal of terrorism.

          From Title 22 of the US Code: "The term "terrorism" means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant (1) targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience."

          Take a look at the link, at your leisure, and perhaps we can get closer to each other's views on this. We should support each other, instead of sniping …

          • WildJew

            "Why had the U.S. intelligence services not been able to prevent the (9/11) disaster? For one thing, they operated independently and competitively. For another, they relied mostly on technology and rarely collaborated with terrorists. Those tactics may have been fine in the Cold War, but it’s pretty tough to combat fanatical ideals with technology. Israeli intelligence, on the other hand, relied mostly on human resources; had countless spies in mosques, Islamic organizations, and leadership roles; and had no problem recruiting even the most dangerous terrorists. They knew they had to have eyes and ears on the inside, along with minds that understood motives and emotions and that could connect the dots.

            "AMERICA UNDERSTOOD NEITHER ISLAMIC CULTURE NOR ITS IDEOLOGY. That, combined with open borders and lax security, made it a much softer target than Israel. Even so, although my role as a spy enabled Israel to take hundreds of terrorists off the streets, our work couldn’t begin to put an end to terrorism—even in a tiny country like Israel.

            Yousef, Mosab Hassan, author: "Son of Hamas" (p. 174)

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Uhm….I don't care how much we expand the government, ostensibly to protect the homeland, but in reality to create the false sense of security necessary so that the US can continue accommodating mass Muslim immigration with all if its excess baggage, as long as we continue to allow mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage, mega rogue violent jihad attacks like 9/11 will always be possible.

            As a matter of fact, even though GWB doubled the size, scope, and power of the federal government and usurped our heretofore constitutionally protected rights and freedoms in the process like a Dhimmicrat on steroids under the guise of protecting the homeland in response to 9/11, the reality is the homeland is more vulnerable today to mega rogue jihad attacks like 9/11 or smaller jihad attacks like the Fort Hood Massacre by virtue of the fact that we have even more stealth jihadists living in America today as a fifth column than we had prior 9/11/2001.

            In fact, GWB never should have proclaimed Islam to be a “Religion of Peace™” being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists. Instead, he should have used common sense to outlaw Islam and ban and reverse mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage ASAP, which is really covert non-violent jihad for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest. Which immediately following 9/11 would have very easy to do.

            Indeed, zero Muslim living in America as a fifth column would eliminate altogether the risk of violent jihad attacks on the homeland and at the same time end the much greater threat of stealth demographic conquest. On top of that, the trillions of dollars wasted for nothing, never would have been wasted, those murdered in domestic violent jihad attacks, such as the Fort Hood Massacre, would still be alive and well today, and the national debt that inevitably exploded through the roof the instant the economy headed south in 2008 thanks to GWB's massive expansion in the size, scope, and power of the federal government for nothing, never would have exploded through the roof.

            Thus, today we wouldn't be on the fast track to becoming the next Greece and gutting our military so that we can continue accommodating mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage. Indeed, growing and expanding government is never the answer to anything, much less protecting the homeland from jihad, and if GWB hadn't been a damn liberal he would have known that.

          • WildJew

            You wrote: "In fact, GWB never should have proclaimed Islam to be a “Religion of Peace™” being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists. Instead, he should have used common sense to outlaw Islam and ban and reverse mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage ASAP, which is really covert non-violent jihad for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest. Which immediately following 9/11 would have very easy to do….."

            It was only days after the 9/11 atrocities that Bush began parroting this nonsense. What did you say or do about it? Did you write anything on this site? Did you call any talk radio stations condemning Bush? Did you write any letters to your editorial page editor repudiating your president. Given the fact you are outspoken in your strong support for a like-minded appeaser who employs similar deceptive language to describe the enemy, how can you be trusted by any right-thinking citizen?

          • WildJew

            I cannot accept this definition. Can you? Why do we have what we call "state sponsors" of international terrorism, if terrorism is confined to sub-national groups or clandestine agents? Former President Bush said: "And we will pursue nations that provide aid or safe haven to terrorism. Every nation in every region now has a decision to make: Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists."

            Nation-states that provide aid or safe haven to these killers, aren't they state sponsors of terrorism?

            What about the "terror bombings" of German cities during the second world war. Wasn't it justified terrorism? Allied terror in response to Nazi terror. Or was it only the Nazis who perpetrated acts of terrorism? If Iran or one of her proxies (Hezbollah for example) detonated a nuclear bomb in an American city, wouldn't the U.S. retaliate in kind and then some? And shouldn't she? Terrorism for terrorism.

            Consequently, shouldn't we broaden the meaning of terrorism? What of the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Weren't those acts of terrorism? Those were largely civilian targets.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            OYM, I thought I would give you a link which you might find interesting, concerning the word "terrorism" : http://www.history.navy.mil/library/guides/terror….

            Same old PC multicultural crap. Like I said above, they all get their information from the same exact source.

            From Title 22 of the US Code: "The term "terrorism" means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant (1) targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience."

            Uhm terror is not an Islamic manifestation, as Muslims instead fight jihad in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme, which, in stark contrast to terrorism, involves both violent means, such as the 9/11 violent jihad attacks, and non-violent means, such as CAIR using misinformation to dupe gullible useful idiots and to smear those telling the truth about Islam as Islamophobes and bigots.

            Terrorism, on the other hand, only involves violence. Thus, when jihad gets conflated and morally equated with being terrorism, per the dictates of PC multiculturalism, the covert non-violent means of jihad as a result inadvertently get overlooked, uncontested, and unopposed.

            In fact, mass Muslim immigration for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme that is occurring today throughout the West totally uncontested and unopposed is in reality covert non-violent jihad. Indeed, Muslims never ever migrate to the West or anywhere else for that matter to assimilate and integrate, but instead to eventually subjugate and dominate for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme.

            Indeed, in country after country and anywhere and everywhere mass Muslim immigration is occurring today in the West, just like clockwork the vast overwhelming majority of Muslim immigrants flat out refuse to assimilate and integrate, and instead form segregated Muslim only enclaves that in time morph into Muslim no-go zones ruled by Sharia as fifth columns and in direct contravention to the laws of the states in which they reside.

            Thus, it is imperative and critically important that our government stop conflating and morally equating jihad with terrorism, so that the various manifestation of covert non-violent jihad can be recognized, contested, and opposed.

            Indeed, it is not hard to do. In fact, if an act of violence wasn't perpetrated in the cause of Allah by Muslims, then it is an act of terrorism. On the other hand, if an act of violence was perpetrated in the cause of Allah by Muslims, then it is an act of violent jihad.

            Furthermore, mass Muslim immigration to the West for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme is also jihad, but it is covert non-violent jihad. CAIR proliferating misinformation and smearing people telling the truth about Islam is also covert non-violent jihad. The hijacking and co-opting of the Middle East Studies Departments of our elite colleges and universities is also covert non-violent jihad. Sharia finance is also covert non-violent jihad. Muslims giving Zakat is covert non-violent jihad. Dawa is covert non-violent jihad.

            However, because jihad is always conflated and morally equated as being terrorism, which is always violent, these covert non-violent means of jihad as a result inadvertently get overlooked, uncontested, and unopposed since they aren't violent, and this current state affairs is extremely detrimental to our national security.

            Indeed, jihad and terrorism are two very unique, distinct, and mutually exclusive manifestations: one is un-Islamic and the other is Islamic, and it is imperative that our government's security forces be trained on how to distinguish between the two different and separate manifestations in order so that they can be contested and opposed to better protect the homeland.

            We completely agree about the nature and threat posed by Islam.

            Not really…you are blinded to the hilt by PC multiculturalism relative to me and as a result suffer some gigantic deficits in knowledge.

          • Stephen_Brady

            "Uhm terror is not an Islamic manifestation …"

            Let's take your points one-by-one, rather than the chapter-length convoluted sentences that you seem to enjoy.

            I never said it was. Terror is a TACTIC, son. It can be used by anyone. That's the point that I and at least half a dozen other people have been trying to beat into your head. It's a TACTIC, used primarily to cause fear among civilian populations, so that they will force what those engaging in the terrorists want. Can't you understand something as simple as that?

          • ObamaYoMoma

            I never said it was. Terror is a TACTIC, son.

            In the West, terror is a tactic, son. In the Islamic world, however, since it isn't an Islamic manifestation, it is blasphemy, which is a capital offense. Indeed, any Muslim that perpetrates a terrorist attack isn't a Muslim. Instead, that perpetrator is a blasphemous apostate that per the dictates of MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX ISLAM must be executed.

            On the other hand, jihad, which is an obligatory duty incumbent upon all Muslims, is holy fighting in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme and is violent, such as in the 9/11 violent jihad attacks, and non-violent, such as in mass Muslim immigration to the West for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme.

            Today, mass Muslim immigration to the West for the purpose stealth demographic conquest takes place throughout the West completely uncontested and unopposed, even though it is covert non-violent jihad. However, because you are blinded to the hilt by PC multiculturalism, your problem is you don't believe mass Muslim immigration to the West is covert non-violent jihad for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest. Instead, you believe those Muslim immigrants are actually moderate Muslims, and that is also what is behind your inability to construe the differences between jihad and terrorism, again because you are blinded to the hilt by PC multiculturalism. Indeed, in your mind if a Muslim isn't caught in the act of violence, then that Muslim is a so-called moderate Muslim.

            It can be used by anyone.

            Not really. It can't be used by Muslims, since it is un-Islamic, and if it is used by Muslims, then the Muslim perpetrator reveals at the same time that he or she isn't a Muslim, but instead a blasphemous apostate that per the dictates of MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX ISLAM must be executed. Meanwhile, jihad, on the other hand, which is holy fighting in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme and involves both violent and non-violent means, is an obligatory duty per the sixth and most important pillar of Islam incumbent upon all Muslims. Indeed, so-called moderate Muslims don't get an exemption and free pass from the obligatory duty to fight jihad in the cause of Allah.

            That's the point that I and at least half a dozen other people have been trying to beat into your head.

            Nah, not really. Just you and some other Canadian moonbat. I think your former liberal partner in crime and fellow stalker got banned for stalking.

            It's a TACTIC, used primarily to cause fear among civilian populations, so that they will force what those engaging in the terrorists want.

            While violent jihad and terrorism share many similarities, there are also some glaring differences as well, as I previously explained ad nauseum in previous posts. In addition, in stark contrast to terrorism, jihad also comprises non-violent means as well. In fact, jihad can involve just about anything and everything violent or non-violent if it is in the cause of Allah. Indeed, it must be in the cause of Allah or it isn't jihad.

            Can't you understand something as simple as that?

            Yeah, I understand the simple fact that you are blinded to the hilt by PC multiculturalism and that when it comes to understanding Islam and the threat that emanates from Islam, you are incompetent.

          • NorthStar

            Terror is a tactic everywhere, Just like hammers are a tool everywhere,____Playing word games won't change that,

          • ObamaYoMoma

            So mass Muslim immigration to the West for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest is covert non-violent terrorism according to you? Or am I just being paranoid because Muslim immigrants are moderate Muslims?

          • NorthStar

            It's another tactic.

            If a Muslim sets your house on fire, it's arson. If a Muslim steals your car, it's car theft. They're different tactics, both made permissible by the Koran.

            Screaming that there's no such thing as arson because Islam forbids arson and that anyone who calls it arson instead of Jihad is a PC multiculturalist just makes you look like a loon and contributes nothing to the struggle.

          • Western Canadian

            Nice effort, but don’t waste your time. Obym is an ill informed idiot, with an profoundly oversized ego. Jihadis from mo himself (I have been made successful through terror) to a current small time clone of mo, General SK Malik of the Pakistani army who wrote a book, The Quranic Concept of War, quote “Whatever the form or type of strategy directed against the enemy, it must, in order to be effective, be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy.”, have happily and joyfully embraced terrorism. You could say terrorism is as islamic as slavery….

            Actually, terrorism was taught to the west by islam…. Brutality in warfare we had achieved on our own, but outright terrorism? No, that came from the criminal and sick mind of mo himself.

            The only two things islam has given the west: the arab-african slave trade, and terrorism.

            This loons blather about terrorism being a ‘western construct’ while he ignores the history of terrorism, says a lot about his poor grade of mind.

            Again, don’t waste your time.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            n order to be effective, be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy.”

            You don't think that the 9/11 violent jihad attack struck terror in the hearts of America? Not to mention that in the eyes of Muslims the perpetrators were jihadists, while in the minds of Westerners blinded by PC multiculturalism like you, they were terrorists.

            Your problem is according to you terrorism constitutes the entirety of the threat. Meanwhile, you welcome mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage even though it is really covert non-violent jihad for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme, because you believe Muslim immigrants are so-called moderate Muslims. Good luck with that.

            Actually, terrorism was taught to the west by islam.

            Give me a break. Terrorism predates Islam by a few thousand years.

            Brutality in warfare we had achieved on our own, but outright terrorism? No, that came from the criminal and sick mind of mo himself.

            I don't know what you are smoking, but whatever it is, email me some of that bad stuff.

          • Western Canadian

            Again, you confirm your status as an idiot, or a plant.

            My quote was “The Quranic Concept of War, quote “Whatever the form or type of strategy directed against the enemy, it must, in order to be effective, be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy.”,

            You did a sloppy, even for you, cut and paste into:
            ‘n order to be effective, be capable of striking terror into the hears of the enemy’

            Drop the reference to the unholy koran, and proceed to make an ass of yourself by:

            ‘You don’t think that the 9/11 violent jihad attack struck terror in the hearts of America?’

            You have just admitted that the victims of this terrorist act were terrified, but you oddly (for sane people, but not for you) suggest that i didn’t think they were terrified. You are truly weird.

            ‘ Not to mention that in the eyes of Muslims the perpetrators were jihadists, while in the minds of Westerners blinded by PC multiculturalism like you, they were terrorists.’

            No pc contamination here. Just your mental illness (NPD) making itself very obvious. Again.

            My comment:
            Actually, terrorism was taught to the west by islam…. Brutality in warfare we had achieved on our own, but outright terrorism? No, that came from the criminal and sick mind of mo himself.

            Your weird reply:

            ‘Give me a break. Terrorism predates Islam by a few thousand years.’

            You didn’t read the line before commenting ‘west’.

            And again, you avoided commenting on mo’s own comment on terror.

            Jihadis from mo himself (I have been made successful through terror) to a current small time clone of mo, General SK Malik of the Pakistani army who wrote a book, The Quranic Concept of War, quote “Whatever the form or type of strategy directed against the enemy, it must, in order to be effective, be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy.”, have happily and joyfully embraced terrorism. You could say terrorism is as islamic as slavery….

            That one paragraph blows you and your ignorance out of the water, quite beautifully.

        • WildJew

          OYM, you wrote: "INDEED, the other night on Greta, when asked what he would do about the doctor that helped the US locate OBL being arrested by Pakistani authorities, he replied to the effect that there is a struggle between moderates and radicals over there and the US should make sure that they back the moderates. Thus, obviously he believes so-called terrorists are radical Islamist (another false PC multicultural term) and extremists, as just like GWB and the frontrunner, he also believes Islam is a Religion of Peace™ being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists…. "

          "Indeed," I just did a quick Google search. I could not find this exchange or this viewpoint. I'm not saying his did not say it. Can you provide a source or a link?

          OYM: "INDEED, all the Republican Party candidates for president are loons…"

          "Indeed," are you saying your favored candidate is a loon when it comes to Islam?

          Lebanese Christian – Act For America founder – Brigitte Gabriel (do you know her?), both she and her activists use the politically correct, charged term "radical Islam" to describe the jihadists, much to my chagrin and protestations.

          ACT for America <a href="http://www.actforamerica.org/” target=”_blank”>www.actforamerica.org/
          "Provides American citizens with a means to be a collective voice for the democratic values of Western Civilization, and against the threat of radical Islam."

          Do you also consider Gabriel, Act For America, and her activists "loons?"

          Last night, in response to your statement that I am "incompetent with respect to Islam," I wrote the following:

          "I've got a few / several books and authors on Islam, Islamic history and law, here in my library and on audio; Audible.com. What have you read about Islam OYM? What authors? What scholars? Name them. Whose books do you have on your shelf?

          "I've not seen this name ObamaYoMama on jihadwatch, have I? What name to you go under on the site? If you posted as an apologist for Romney on Jihadwatch, as you have here, I cannot say I've seen you. Then what name do you post under?"

          Since you've invoked Spencer and his Jihadwatch site, will you be so kind as to address my questions?

          Speaking of Spencer, it looks like he disagrees (at least in part) with your evaluation of Gingrich:

          Good for Gingrich, who dares to disavow Sharia
          by Robert Spencer01/24/2012
          130
          Comments
          Just before his stunning victory in the South Carolina primary, Newt Gingrich drew the ire of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the deceptive Islamic supremacist group that bamboozles many with its pose as a neutral civil rights organization. Gingrich, fumed a CAIR spokesman, was "one of the nation's worst promoters of anti-Muslim bigotry." How did Gingrich earn this dubious honor? By telling the truth about Islamic law, and making clear his determination to resist it……

          http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=49010

          Mitt Romney on Sharia Law in US Courts

          June 13, 2011

          "Well, first of all, of course, we're not going to have Sharia law applied in U.S. courts. That's never going to happen. We have a Constitution and we follow the law."

          http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1106/13/se

          Romney: "Don't worry, be happy…." (?)

        • WildJew

          Question OYM. I'm just asking for clarification purposes. Do you believe there are some Muslims who for whatever reason are moderate or peaceful Muslims or is the only good Muslim a dead Muslim?

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Look dude…some of us got to work for a living. Anyway, per the sixth and most important pillar of Islam, it is an obligatory duty in Islam for EVERY MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MULSIM ON EARTH to fight jihad in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme. Indeed, the sixth and most important pillar of Islam doesn't make it an obligatory duty for only so-called extremist Muslims to fight jihad in the cause of Allah, and the sixth and most important pillar of Islam doesn't make it an obligatory duty for only so-called radical Muslims to fight jihad in the cause of Allah, and the sixth and most important pillar of Islam doesn't make it an obligatory duty for only so-called Islamist Muslims to fight jihad in the cause of Allah, while at the same time issuing an exemption and giving a free pass to so-called moderate Muslims on fighting jihad in the cause of Allah. Instead, the sixth and most important pillar of Islam makes it an obligatory duty for ALL MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLINS ON EARTH to fight jihad in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme. No exceptions!

            Therefore, ALL MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS ON EARTH are jihadists. A tiny minority of them are violent jihadists, while the vast overwhelming majority of them are covert non-violent jihadists, and the few that are not jihadist are not Muslim at all, but instead blasphemous apostates that per the dictates of MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX ISLAM must be executed.

          • WildJew

            I work for a living. My profession is agriculture. My business is based on my property. Given what you profess or pretend to believe, why then do you so strongly support an apologist for Islam like Mitt Romney?

          • ObamaYoMoma

            For the same reason that you support an apologist for Islam like Newt Gingrich! Indeed, like I keep telling you, they are all loons. In fact, if they weren't all loons, they would be being ravaged by CAIR, the Left, and the media. It isn't happening, demonstrating again that they are all loons. As a matter of fact, if Obama wasn't president, I wouldn't vote for any of them. However, I never would vote for an amnesty supporter and a leftwing anti-capitalist like Gingrich under any circumstances.

          • WildJew

            "Amnesty-supporter and a left-wing anti-capitalist." This is a recurrent theme with you. Apparently the global jihad, Islam, the Islamic threat, etc., is not a priority issue for you after all. You simply feign that it is. Illegal Mexican immigration is your issue. Maybe, like some of my self-professed conservative neighbors, immediately after 9/11 you used the atrocities as a justification (a pretext) to demand authorities deal with the Mexican immigration problem as though 19 Mexicans (Catholics) flew those planes into the World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Apparently the kind of agriculture you are doing is growing pot. Careful, don't smoke all the profits, Obama may get reelected.

          • Stephen_Brady

            "Therefore, ALL MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS ON EARTH are jihadists. A tiny minority of them are violent jihadists, while the vast overwhelming majority of them are covert non-violent jihadists, and the few that are not jihadist are not Muslim at all, but instead blasphemous apostates that per the dictates of MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX ISLAM must be executed."

            Do the Obamas eat fried chicken and watermelon every night at the White House?

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Do the Obamas eat fried chicken and watermelon every night at the White House?

            Of course, you think that I'm a racist because you are blinded to the hilt by PC multiculturalism, and never mind the fact that Islam is a supremacist theo-political totalitarian ideology and not a race. Well that's par for the course for you and a typical leftists response. Why am I not surprised?

            And let's hear you again claiming to be a conservative so that I can debunk your false claims over and over again by throwing out this stupid emotional response over and over again every time you make that same stupid and idiotic assertion.

            By the way, instead of acting emotionally by insinuating that I'm a racist, why didn't you try to debunk me and prove me wrong like a normal rational conservative would do? Because you are a leftist that's why! You don't rationalize, you emote exactly like your former fake conservative leftwing partner in crime. You moonbats may fool some people, but you sure in the hell didn't fool me.

            In any event, it really doesn't matter, because you can't prove me wrong since I can document fully everything I said in the post you are responding to.

            The Sixth Pillar of Islam is Jihad or holy fighting and this is an obligation for every Muslim on earth! No exceptions.

            The Noble Koran published in Saudi Arabia by the “King Fahd Complex for the Printing of the Holy Qur’an, Madinah, K.S.A,” and you can’t get any more official than that, says the following about surah 2, verse 190:

            “Al-Jihad (holy fighting) in Allah’s Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry) is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of its pillars (on which it stands). Allah’s Word is made superior, (His Word being Lailaha illallah which means none has the right to be worshipped but Allah), and His Religion (Islam) is propagated. By abandoning Jihad (may Allah protect us from that) Islam is destroyed and the Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honour is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihad is an obligatory duty in Islam on every Muslim, and he who tries to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to fulfil this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.”

            You will probably respond by saying I'm taking that passage out of context or something stupid like that.

          • Stephen_Brady

            You're taking the passage out of context …

            I wouldn't want to disappoint you!

            Note that I didn't call you a racist. I called you an absolutist. Absolutism is an intellectual absurdity, and is one of the last refuges left to an intellectual tyrant.

            By the way, did you enjoy the primaries, yesterday?

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Note that I didn't call you a racist.

            I didn't say that you called me a racist. Instead, I said that like a typical leftists you emoted by insinuating that I was a racist. Indeed, you wrote the following:

            “Secondarily, his purpse may be to get people to "agree" with his positions and show their "racism".

            Absolutism is an intellectual absurdity, and is one of the last refuges left to an intellectual tyrant.

            Absolutism is only an intellectual absurdity if you are adherent to moral relativism, which is another dead give away that you and your unhinged stalking buddies in crime are leftist plants.

            Not to mention moonbat, but Islam is not a faith-based religion, as the first and foremost requirement of Islam is that all Muslims must totally, completely, and unconditionally submit to the will of Allah where the freedom of conscience is forbidden and where blasphemy and apostasy are capital offenses. Indeed, the word Islam in Arabic means”submission” and the word Muslim in Arabic means “one who submits.”

            Hence, what faith-based religions similarly forbids the freedom of conscience and likewise makes blasphemy and apostasy capital offenses? Let me help you out, the answer is none of them. Irrefutably proving at the same time that Islam is not a faith-based religion, and since Islam is not a faith-based religion, exactly what is Islam? It is a supremacist theo-political totalitarian ideology that masquerades as being a religion in order to dupe the gullible societies it intends to eventually subjugate into a very draconian form of Islamic totalitarianism via the imposition of Sharia for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme.

            Thus, again ALL MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS ON EARTH are jihadists. A tiny minority of them are violent jihadists, while the vast overwhelming majority of them are covert non-violent jihadists, and the few that are not jihadist are not Muslim at all, but instead blasphemous apostates that per the dictates of MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX ISLAM must be executed.

            By the way, point to just one non-Muslim country anywhere in the world where mass Muslim immigration has been occurring for decades and where the vast overwhelming majority of Muslim immigrants actually assimilated and integrated and matriculated into becoming productive and contributing loyal citizens of their newly adoptive countries. There is no such place on the planet as mass Muslim immigration has turned into an unmitigated disaster in every case.

            In fact, the longer mass Muslim immigration manifest and the greater the percentage of Muslims relative to the native populations gets, the more and more aggressive and demanding those Muslim immigrants will inevitably become, until eventually everything we see happening in Nigeria today is happening there as well. As Muslims only migrate for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme. Indeed, demographic conquest is the most prevalent form of covert non-violent jihad employed by the Islamic world against the West today. As a matter of fact, it is forbidden for Muslims to live outside the Dar al Islam (domain of submission) and in the Dar al Harb (domain of unbelief) unless it is for the purpose of jihad in the cause of Allah.

            Indeed, mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage to the West for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest has turned into an unmitigated disaster in every case without exception, and you don't have to be an Islamic authority to see it. All you have to do is be able to connect the dots. Apparently, you are not only incredibly ignorant of Islam and blinded to the hilt by PC multiculturalism at the same time, but you are also unable to connect simple dots. Not surprised, as you are a typical leftist addicted to group think. Oh well.

            By the way, did you enjoy the primaries, yesterday?

            Yeah….I'm a little disappointed, but it is because Fox News took something Mitt said out of context earlier in the week and turned into the biggest news story of the week. Just like it turned Mitt not releasing his taxes returns according to a Gingrich's demand into a week long story the week of the South Carolina primary. Unfortunately, Fox News can impact just about any race it wants to.

            In any event, Santorum's victories last night were more cosmetic than substantive and will cause him to remain in the race, which will continue to dilute Gingrich's support. So that's the bright side.

            Nevertheless, I don't believe you are a real Gingrich supporter. Instead, I believe you are an Obama supporter and plant.

          • NorthStar

            "Hence, what faith-based religions similarly forbids the freedom of conscience and likewise makes blasphemy and apostasy capital offenses?"

            Learn some history. Start with the Inquisition. That will help stop you from humiliating yourself in public.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Learn some history. Start with the Inquisition. That will help stop you from humiliating yourself in public.

            Okay, so you couldn't answer the question. The Inquisition ah? Yeah right, the only people that I know that instantly make moral equivalences between Christianity and Islam is leftwing moonbats. Thanks for giving yourself away.

          • NorthStar

            You claimed that Islam was the only religion to punish apostasy and blasphemy with the death penalty.

            That's not true.

            You can scream MORAL EQUIVALENCE or PC MULTICULTURALISM or anything you want. We're not here to discuss your fantasies. We're here to discuss facts.

            Islam can be proven to be a threat based on facts. When you try to silence people into going along with your ignorant theories and false claims that any educated person can take apart, you endanger the war against Islam.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            You claimed that Islam was the only religion to punish apostasy and blasphemy with the death penalty.

            That's not true.

            Islam not only forbids the freedom of conscience, but blasphemy and apostasy are also capital offenses. You claim that's not true. Okay, why don't you put your money where your unhinged mouth is and name other faith-based religions that also forbid the freedom of conscience and that also make blasphemy and apostasy capital offenses?

            We're not here to discuss your fantasies. We're here to discuss facts.

            We're? You mean you, Stephen_Brady, and Western Canadian, aka: the leftist cyberstalkers are here to have fun by harassing some of the conservatives on FPM, especially the ones exposing the truth about Islam.

            With respect to the rest of your garbage, it is becoming more and more obvious that you guys are deliberately cyberstalking me. Indeed, on the very first day you showed up here, you replied to five of my posts in four different article threads spaced about a minute apart, and all of them were insulting. Obviously, it was very coordinated.

            Then subsequently ever since then you have been seeking out and replying to my posts and my post alone on a daily basis with nothing but insults in a feeble attempt to harass me. This is obviously being coordinated with your other partners in crime and fellow leftist cyberstalkers Stephen_Brady and Western Canadian. Apparently, Stephen_Brady hasn't learned his lesson from his previous campaign in cyberstalking me.

            Obviously, you, Stephen_Brady, and Western Canadian are all delusional leftist afflicted with group think who for whatever reason decided to have a little fun by posing as conservatives on FPM in order to hassle some of the true conservatives that are exposing the truth about Islam. In fact, collectively just today, you cyberstalkers have already posted 13 coordinated replies to me so for and all of them were deliberately insulting and derogatory.

          • NorthStar

            All three monotheistic religions have punished apostasy and blasphemy with death.

            Your paranoia about being cyberstalked is another manifestation of your mental state. The only thing you do here is post deliberately insulting and derogatory comments and then cry that the people arguing are stalking you.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            All three monotheistic religions have punished apostasy and blasphemy with death.

            There are only two monotheistic religions? Thus, specifically which monotheistic religions have and when?

            The other one you allege to be a monotheistic religion is really a supremacist theo-political totalitarian ideology that masquerades as being a monotheistic religion to dupe gullible useful idiots. Indeed, out of the 57 Islamic states in the world, how many aren't totalitarian?

            Your paranoia about being cyberstalked is another manifestation of your mental state. The only thing you do here is post deliberately insulting and derogatory comments and then cry that the people arguing are stalking you.

            You mean just like you? By the way, I've checked, you haven't replied to anyone else's posts. Just my posts. Do you have a crush on me or something? Or are you just a cyberstalker with your fellow leftwing cohorts in crime? Indeed, who put you moonbats up to this?

          • NorthStar

            All three monotheistic religions have punished apostasy and blasphemy with death.

            Islam is a mortal threat, but that doesn't mean it's not a religion. If theocracies weren't considered religions, then there were no religions for most of human history.

            Playing with definitions to avoid dealing with the facts is a bad leftist you have.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Please excuse me, but you are way, way too mentally incompetent to warrant a response.

          • NorthStar

            You never respond to anyone because you can't defend your ridiculous arguments.

            You must be the mentally incompetent one.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            More cyberstalking.

          • NorthStar

            Troll and whine just like a leftist.

          • NorthStar

            Funny how you're incapable of defending the same argument that you spam non-stop.

            Just like a leftist.

          • NorthStar

            Looks your cyberstalking needs work. I reply to other people.

            It's amazing what a leftist you are. Cyberstalking the people you're accusing of cyberstalking you. And doing a poor job of it. Then going on a paranoid rant because you're so sloppy.

            Have you thought about a job with the White House?

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Yeah right…it's pretty easy to establish that you were always the first to respond to one of my posts, as I never ever responded to you unless you responded to me first and always in a derogatory fashion. In fact, I never ever saw you on this site until you suddenly popped up cyberstalking me in cahoots with your fellow cyberstalker friends and partners in crime.

          • NorthStar

            So you can't actually back up your arguments, but you can develop a whole conspiracy theory to explain why people don't like you.

            What a leftist tool.

          • gobot

            The inquistion was used against muslims and jews about 500 years ago, give or take a century. Not relevant to the discussion.

          • NorthStar

            It wouldn't be relevant except that Moma was too dumb not to phrase his claim in a way that makes it relevant.

            Which is why people like that should not be representing our side in the debate.

          • Stephen_Brady

            "Nevertheless, I don't believe you are a real Gingrich supporter. Instead, I believe you are an Obama supporter and plant."

            And I believe you are an Obama supporter and plant. One of us is right, and it's not you …

            … did you catch that? Someone said, "You are not right." Now, it's time for your NPD to kick in and cause you a night or two in the psych ward ..

          • ObamaYoMoma

            … did you catch that? Someone said, "You are not right." Now, it's time for your NPD to kick in and cause you a night or two in the psych ward ..

            More emoting….another dead give away.

          • NorthStar

            You're the only one emoting here.

          • Western Canadian

            You are wasting your time. This low grade idiot is incapable of interaction, supplying sources, asking questions…. His only tools are an ignorance based and pathetic bluster, and childish name calling… He does not know the subject (either islam, terrorism or terrorisms roots in islam….) but his profoundly oversized ego, requires that he continue to run off at the mouth, and offer up his poorly conceived notions, in a manner that only a high school student (flunking each and every course) would consider to be of merit.

            Several other posters have tried to get through to him, and have given up. Sadly severl excellent posters seem to have faded, after becoming disgusted with his chronic blather.

      • http://frontpagemag.com Francisco Bravo

        Newt is no Saint and perfect but,at least he understands the ongoing genocide on Christians being perpetrated by mohamedans worldwide. Obromney and Santorum stood against Newt when he used the “invented People ” to call the Palestinians.

        • WildJew

          That's been my point in addition to the fact that both Romney and Santorum – Romney led the charge – essentially took the side of the Palestinian jihadists by repudiating Gingrich for telling the truth about these killers. OYM says all that (what I have posted re: Romney condemning Gingrich and taking the side of the jihadists) is irrelevant "spam." I see little difference between Romney and former President George W. Bush on Islam. For that matter I see little difference between OYM, Bush and Romney. All are willing to mislead the public about Islam.

  • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

    You are still weeping over the Shah of Iran. Still wishing for the old dictator. Still wishing a BP figurehead was bleeding the country dry. The Shahmust have been one of the most fantastic leaders of all time the way you, Barbara Walters, and half of Israel still weep over him. It reminds me how on the news here in America, the networks fixate on the British royal family, fauning over their children’s exploits, cooing over Fergie’s clothes. Did you want to want to be the Shah’s exchequer if something? Want to have a tryst with Ahmed Chalabi? Maybe you can wear the embroidered Nehru jacket for a day. The world sees you pining for dictators and slandering US presidents.

    • WildJew

      "The Shah of Iran was no champion of human rights, and neither was Hosni Mubarak….. Both the Shah and Mubarak then ran afoul of leftist Democrat presidents who positioned their betrayal of these undeniably less-than-perfect allies as a responsibility necessitated by their commitment to human rights.

      "Jimmy Carter praised the Ayatollah Khomeini as a fellow “man of faith,” and Barack Obama’s Muslim upbringing (quite aside from the ever-swirling rumors about his actual religious affiliation) appear to have given him a warmly positive view of Islam and Sharia."

    • Maher

      Don’t worry Floppy, you’ll get what you are asking for. More and more obscurantism. Arab/Muslim world is a huge cloaca.

    • WilliamJamesWard

      Flippie don't be so jealous, you can have a Nehru jacket if you want……….William

      • Big Irish

        problem is William we wont be able to see his nehru jacket – he will be one of the first ones to be buried up to their necks before getting stoned…..

    • ObamaYoMoma

      The Shahmust have been one of the most fantastic leaders of all time the way you,

      Well relative to most other Middle East thug rulers that you so admire, the Shah was very progressive. As he gave females equal rights so that they could be educated, learn to drive, and join the workforce. He also broke the feudal system that had existed for centuries by taking the land away from the Islamic Waqf and redistributing it to the people. In fact, the Shah made hundred of Westernized reforms in an effort to rapidly modernize his country and transform it from a draconian 7th century society to 20th century modernity.

      Indeed, all of these blasphemous reforms garnered the ire of the Mullahs and their conservative devout followers, which ignited an insurgent jihad against the Shah and his regime. Of course, the Left always the opportunists, joined the jihad against the Shah as useful idiots. Eventually, after the Shah was ousted – thanks to the stupidity of Jimmy Carter – they were massacred in mass by their Islamic allies as soon as their usefulness ran out as usual. Same old story.

      Now was the Shah ruthless against his enemies and did he employ a lot of tactics that cut against the grain of human rights? You bet he was and you bet he did, otherwise his enemies would have simply obliterated him and his regime. Indeed, the Shah did what he had to do to hold onto power.

      However, the Shah wasn't any more ruthless in defense of his regime than any other Middle East dictatorial thug rulers back then or today. In fact, by those standards, the Shah was a saint. Nevertheless, Jimmy Carter in his infinite wisdom and without having a clue about the intricacies of Islamic society or an understanding of what the Shah was trying to accomplish, pulled the Persian rug out from under the terminally ill Shah, and Iran has been an Islamic totalitarian hellhole and pariah ever since.

      I challenge anyone to modernize an Islamic country today and to adhere to human rights at the same time. I doubt that they will last a week.

    • reader

      "The world sees you pining for dictators and slandering US presidents."

      flipside thinks of self as the world, no less. Gives ego-maniacs a bad name.

  • WilliamJamesWard

    Who can know the depths of hate in the core of these two men that they would take
    actions bringing about the deaths of countless innocent individuals in power
    wars alien to America and with or without understanding the significance for the
    future peace. Obama leans heavily towards totalitarian Islam while paying lip
    service to American values and culture. Change he promised and for many
    change means impoverishment and death through war that was not inevitable
    except for acquiescence. Maybe a million of the Shah's followers were
    murdered after he was deposed, the Muslim Brotherhood must have it's list
    for the gallows ready and are licking their lips at the opportunity to cleans the
    Caliphate of all but Sharia followers in a river of blood.That Americans will be
    made to suffer insult and injury is par for the course………………..William

  • StephenD

    So far, only Gingrich has called it what it is in public. Regardless of his history, on this and other important issues, he is the best.
    As to Egypt; STOP all aid immediately. Tell the MB or whomever is actually in command to release the Americans or this will be considered an act of war. Respond accordingly to Egypt’s answer. The only thing that works with thugs is force.

    • NorthStar

      Agreed

  • Leland

    In spite of Obama's heroism while personally leading the Bin Laden and Somali hostage rescue, he appears to lack the will, the courage, to face down radical Islam. Assuming good intentions, the President does not seem to grasp the fact you cannot negotiate with true believers. Islamic areas/states will never adopt any thing similar to western style democracy. Aside from Israel, there are no representative democracies within this festering sea of Islam.

    • LoveFreedom

      "you cannot negotiate with true believers" [esp. Moohamedans].
      As all you informed people on this site know, this is the problem, the challenge of our times. War IS coming to the world, probably later this year, and starting in the MidEast. Prepare yourselves spiritually, mentally, and with whatever supplies you deem wise. We love Freedom and we WILL survive the coming trouble!

    • Jimmy

      Obama personally led those missions? What a joke! Please wake up.

      • Chris C

        I think he/she was being sarcastic…

  • Attila The Hun

    Unfortunately in 2008 American electorate gave Jimmy the second term he desperately wanted . The question 2012 is , that The American people are stupid enough to award
    Jimmy Obama a third term.? I'm afraid they might.

  • Western Spirit

    Heavens, I hope Obama isn't going to be another Jimmy Carter! One was enough and we've still got the original Carter dispensing the "wisdom" that made him such a great president.

    • Stephen_Brady

      He already is …

  • Wee Willie

    In the mid 19th century,empirical evidence showed that by placing the physicians hands in a lime solution the spread of "child bed fever" was slowed. However, the was only empirical evidence for this. Haughty physicians refused to clean their hands leading to the deaths of thousands of new mothers.

    American both of the left and right seem to have an allergy to the Monarchy. Instead of a vague "democracy" the restoration of Monarch in the Muslim world (and the rest of the world) would lead to far greater freedoms for the subjects. Note, a Jew was in the cabinet of the Egyptian King in the 1920's. The horror in the nodern Muslim world followed the overthrow of the Monarch.

    In fact are there any instances in which the overthrow of the Monarch lead to better government? (China Perhaps?)

  • BLJ

    Carter was a horrible President and is a major league boob these days, but he was and is no where near as bad or dangerous as Comrade O.

    I believe at one time Jimbo loved his country. I don't think the Chosen One has ever loved the U.S. Giving this creature another term is a death sentence for our liberty and way of life.

    I am praying that there are not enough of the "Flipside's" and "Amused's" to vote this Marxist back into office. It is a shame that being stupid does not disqualify people from voting.

  • KKKK

    "rather than being grateful to Carter, Khomeini simply viewed (Carter's) abandomnet of the Shah as a sign fo weaknes…and presed on with his jihad agansit the Great Satan."
    jsut like today, osama-obama is trying to reach out to the theocrachy-thugarchy in tehrna, but they are o nthe verge of having the mreans to destory us.
    what goes around comes around.

  • slide

    The leftists always want to brand their 'destablizing' propanda as 'foundamental change'.

    Now they have done some successful changes around the world.

    Maybe when there's no stable regime in the world, they might want to try 'stablize' it again? Or maybe not, chaos is their ultimate goal.

  • mrbean

    Jimmy Carter is an anti semitic southern white trash collectivist and Brack Obama is the bastard marxist offspring of a registered communist wigger and foreign registered communist muslim. Both Carter and Obama are colossal failures as President.

  • kafir4life

    Obama makes Carter look like Reagan by comparison. It didn't take good ol' Stinky (BO) long to surpass the other terrorist pal as the worst. Let's get him started on being the worst ex-president in history (Carter's the leader there too) within the next year.

  • Yetwave

    Just as Carter was the anti-Nixon, so is Obama the anti-Bush. Among the Dems, there was so much hatred for Nixon and Bush that in their view, the perverse world views of Carter and Obama were preferable alternatives. Voters wised up after a single term and sent Carter back to peanut farming. I can only hope that the US voter has enough sense to give Obama a ticket for a quick ride back to Chicago in November.

  • maria

    Leftists/Dem's controled 90% Media. Propaganda made from Pres. Bush a monster. In reality he was in many sense a good Pres, not perfect of course, but good one. Unemployee rate was 4.6%, economy rised more than in any Eroupean country. Most important he react adequately to 9/11 tragedy. If that time was Carter, Clinton ( whos foreign policy led to 09/11 as Muslims decided that we are weak), or G-d forbid BHO probably we would have 10th or more such terracts. Any Republicans better than our Hussein. But media still makes their dirty and very dangerous for country job.

  • http://%BLOGTITLE%-justgreat! world clock

    Jimmy Carter All Over Again | FrontPage Magazine – just great!

  • http://%BLOGTITLE%-justgreat! worldclock

    Jimmy Carter All Over Again | FrontPage Magazine – just great!

  • jacko

    Obama has undermined America from his first taking office. He also has managed to install fanatical Islam in the ME

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Believe me when I tell you that I am done with him. It is quite possible that he is a plant, on this website, whose purpose is to stir up trouble between us. Secondarily, his purpse may be to get people to "agree" with his positions and show their "racism". After all, what he really wants from us is to agree to his absolutist view that "all Muslims are evil" (a paraphrase). I believe that Islam if fundamentally evil, but humans cannot be categorized with absolutes, as he does.

    Yep…if anyone is a plant on this site pretending to be something they are not, it is you, your leftwing Canadian buddy, and your former fellow leftwing partner in crime and Internet stalker.

    This is a site dedicated to conservative values and principles and not leftwing values and principles, and the fact that you are trying to marginalize me as being a racist for telling the truth about Islam is so typical of the left, which indicates that all you moonbats are really leftwing plants. No wonder you guys collectively were stalking me and harassing me for exposing the truth about Islam.

    • Stephen_Brady

      "This is a site dedicated to conservative values and principles …"

      Yes, it is. And you bring disrepute upon those principles when you make the absolutist's assumption that ALL of 1.3 billion people are exactly alike.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Yes, it is. And you bring disrepute upon those principles when you make the absolutist's assumption that ALL of 1.3 billion people are exactly alike.

        Moral relativism is a dead give away of leftism and I never said they were all alike. I said that per the dictates of Islam they are all jihadists, either violent jihadists or otherwise covert non-violent jihadists. Otherwise, if they are not jihadists, then they are not Muslims at all, but blasphemous apostates instead that per the dictates of MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX ISLAM as opposed to so-called radical Islam, which is a PC multicultural myth, they must be executed. Now that doesn't mean they are all alike, but nevertheless Islam does enforce its totalitarian text and tenets via the pain of death, which irrefutably proves that Islam is not a true religion. Figure it out.

        You are little more than a gullible useful idiot, you are blinded to the hilt by PC multiculturalism, and you are a suicidal unhinged loon.

        Indeed, why don't you explain to us how for a fact you know that most non-violent Muslim immigrants are moderates? In other words, instead of emoting like a leftists, support your argument with facts.

        Point to a single country in the world where mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage has been a resounding success. Of course, you'll have to find one where mass Muslim immigration has been occurring for long enough? For instance, is it a success in France? How about in Cote D'Ivoire, Nigeria, Kashmir, Thailand, the Philippines, Bosnia, Sweden, etc. Indeed, backup what you claim like me.

        • Western Canadian

          In the off chance that the reference to a ‘left wing canadian’ was a reference to me, i offer you a heartfelt invitation to remove your head from where it is firmly ensconced, where the sun don’t shine. If you had actually read anyone else’s posts, rather than scanned them so you could reply thinking you were not making a fool out of yourself, you wouldn’t be anywhere near as much of a sickening blowhard and half-wit. But that will never change.

          Your only reply is to stamp you feet, cry, and name call like the true moron you are (no, not an example of irony, just the truth). True conservatives have nothing to do with asinine dolts like you. You are so utterly pathetic, you think screaming ‘pc’ or ‘left wing’ is an argument, rather than an endless revelation of your intellectual weakness.

          None of the people wasting their time with you are pc. Most of us loath pc, as much as we do ignorant fools and loudmouths like you. Your pathetic, childishly overblown writing style is without exception adopted by people with no argument, no facts, no logic, and in your case, no understanding of grammar.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            True conservatives have nothing to do with asinine dolts like you

            How would you know? True conservatives aren't Muslim apologist. By the way, read your last twenty posts responding to me, they're all full of nothing but name calling and invectives like this one indicating that you emote instead of rationalize just like delusional leftists.

            And all of this vitriol because you want to defend Muslim immigrants posing as moderate Muslims. Yeah….I almost believe you are a conservative. Get lost you loser before you bore me to death.

        • Stephen_Brady

          You know, we have no argument over Muslim immigration, or the nature of Islam, itself, or anything else. The one unforgiveable sin that I committed … in your eyes … was to disagree with you on what terrorism consists of.

          Secondarily, we now disagree on your stereotyping of 1.3 billion people as having the SAME view on everything.

          Disagreeing with you causes a flareup of your NPD. If I were you, I would talk to my doctor about increasing or changing my meds …

          • ObamaYoMoma

            The one unforgiveable sin that I committed … in your eyes … was to disagree with you on what terrorism consists of

            It's not a sin to disagree with me on anything. However, it is pure utter stupidity not to be able to comprehend the very significant differences between jihad and terrorism and why it is very important that the proper un-politically correct terms be used. Again, if jihad is called terrorism, it is automatically not associated with Islam, and also because it enables the countless means of covert non-violent jihad to manifest throughout the West totally uncontested and unopposed.

            Secondarily, we now disagree on your stereotyping of 1.3 billion people as having the SAME view on everything.

            First, whose we? You and your fellow leftwing cyberstalker buddies, like those unhinged loons North Star and Western Canadian, who in coordination with you have been stalking and harassing me for weeks, while replying to no one else at the same time but only me. Okay, I understand. By the way, what happened to your last leftwing cyberstalker buddy?

            Anyway, I never stereotyped or said that all Muslims are alike. However, since ALL MAINSTEAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS first and foremost submit totally, completely, and unconditionally to the will of Allah, and because the freedom of conscience in Islam is forbidden and blasphemy and apostasy are capital offenses, when it comes to Islam they are all alike, otherwise they are blasphemous apostates that per the dictates of MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX ISLAM must be executed. I would wager staying a live is a pretty compelling reason for Muslims to stay true to their submission to the will of Allah.

            Not to mention, that Muslims that have no inclination for violence, can migrate to the West to become covert non-violent jihadists for the cause of Allah. Hence, they can live a perfectly violence free life and appear to be perfectly moderate Muslims for all intents and purposes and still fulfill their obligatory duty for jihad. Hell, they can remain in the Islamic world and give zakat for jihad and at the same time fulfill their obligatory duty for jihad. Or if they prefer to become a martyr, then they can strap own a suicide belt and blow up non-Muslim unbelievers and not only fulfill their obligatory duty to fight jihad, but also at the same time get a one way ticket to Allah's version of carnal paradise. Indeed, Allah didn't specify how individual Muslims must fulfill their obligatory duty for jihad. He just made it an obligatory duty. Thus, you see that Muslims are not all alike and also no one is stereotyping them except for you, as you stereotype all Muslims as being moderate Muslims unless and until they get caught or killed perpetrating a violent jihad attack, or otherwise until they get caught with a suicide belt strapped on.

            Disagreeing with you causes a flareup of your NPD. If I were you, I would talk to my doctor about increasing or changing my meds …

            Cyberstalking and masquerading as a conservative in order to stalk, harass, and try to intimidate true conservatives in my book isn't too sane buddy. It also isn't too smart either. By the way, for obvious reasons I don't believe you are a glorified teacher and I also don't believe in your sob story with respect to your two sons either. Don't like it? Sue me.

          • NorthStar

            Where were we?

            You pick fights, insult people, spam the comments and then cry that you're being attacked.

            You cyberstalk others and collect information about their personal lives. Then you accuse them of stalking you.

            You never provide proof for any of your arguments and you can't argue the facts, so you accuse them of thought crimes and using politically incorrect terms.

            If you're not actually a leftist, you have the personality of one.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            More cyberstalking!

          • NorthStar

            Come on now. Don't troll and whine.

          • NorthStar

            Why don't you stop your leftist victim games and respond to the point.

          • NorthStar

            "it is very important that the proper un-politically correct terms be used"

            Skip the Un. These are your own politically correct terms that you're trying to force on everyone else for your own reasons.

            Forcing people to use specific terms for political reasons is the definition of political correctness.

  • NorthStar

    ObamaYoMoma may be a plant or just mentally ill. Doesn't make a difference because the results are the same.

    He's not worth arguing with in depth because he can't back up his arguments and just turns to insults, But ignoring him is dangerous because it makes him seem credible.

    A one two sentence takedown of the nonsense he spams works best.

    • Stephen_Brady

      I agree with you. I will not debate with him, at length, because he either dosn't know the rules of debate, or does not care about them.