<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fighting for Religious Freedom in the Obama Era</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/volpe/fighting-for-religious-freedom-in-the-obama-era/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/volpe/fighting-for-religious-freedom-in-the-obama-era/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fighting-for-religious-freedom-in-the-obama-era</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 06:41:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Lsc</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/volpe/fighting-for-religious-freedom-in-the-obama-era/comment-page-1/#comment-3755658</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lsc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=159877#comment-3755658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow Mark, you don&#039;t make any sense at all and clearly could use a lesson in the difference between the Taliban and pro-life Christians. First, no one is forcing anyone to carry a child. That was a choice (in by far most cases), made by consenting adults. If they were irresponsible then they need to make another adult decision as to how they choose to handle it. Personally, I don&#039;t want to pay for their lack of responsibility. That being said, Christians heavily support adoptions, adoption agencies, fostering and hundreds of other related programs and charities, by choice. They should not be forced to go against their conscience and pay for murder. Your buddies who insist that we pick up their tab are the ones living in the past...way ack when birth control options were few and far between. Instead of picking on people of conscience, why don&#039;t suggest o your buddies that they look into birth control? Taliban like....lol. That&#039;s a foolish statement on so many levels.  
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Mark, you don&#039;t make any sense at all and clearly could use a lesson in the difference between the Taliban and pro-life Christians. First, no one is forcing anyone to carry a child. That was a choice (in by far most cases), made by consenting adults. If they were irresponsible then they need to make another adult decision as to how they choose to handle it. Personally, I don&#039;t want to pay for their lack of responsibility. That being said, Christians heavily support adoptions, adoption agencies, fostering and hundreds of other related programs and charities, by choice. They should not be forced to go against their conscience and pay for murder. Your buddies who insist that we pick up their tab are the ones living in the past&#8230;way ack when birth control options were few and far between. Instead of picking on people of conscience, why don&#039;t suggest o your buddies that they look into birth control? Taliban like&#8230;.lol. That&#039;s a foolish statement on so many levels.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martha Benton</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/volpe/fighting-for-religious-freedom-in-the-obama-era/comment-page-1/#comment-3754972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martha Benton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 16:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=159877#comment-3754972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spoken like a true dumbed down liberal. YOU should be ashamed you didn&#039;t take advantage of your education and actually learn to READ. THEN you could read the ObamaCare takeover law for YOURSELF and not rely on Obama and the liberal media to &#039;tell you what they want you to believe&#039;. ANYBODY voting for Obama after the 3 1/2 years he has flushed America down the toilet, do not deserve to live in America. Why? Because it&#039;s people like YOU that have put us in this mess. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spoken like a true dumbed down liberal. YOU should be ashamed you didn&#039;t take advantage of your education and actually learn to READ. THEN you could read the ObamaCare takeover law for YOURSELF and not rely on Obama and the liberal media to &#039;tell you what they want you to believe&#039;. ANYBODY voting for Obama after the 3 1/2 years he has flushed America down the toilet, do not deserve to live in America. Why? Because it&#039;s people like YOU that have put us in this mess. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mkat68</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/volpe/fighting-for-religious-freedom-in-the-obama-era/comment-page-1/#comment-3733711</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mkat68]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 05:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=159877#comment-3733711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Section 2713 of the Public Health Service Act, enacted by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148) (the &#8220;Obamacare&#8221; statute), provides that &#8220;A group health plan and a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall, at a minimum provide coverage for and shall not impose any cost sharing requirements for&#8212; . . . (4) with respect to women, such additional preventive care and screenings . . . as provided for in comprehensive guidelines supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration . . . .&#8221; 
 
Those HRSA guidelines currently provide for &#8220;All Food and Drug Administration approved contraceptive methods, sterilization procedures, and patient education and counseling for all women with reproductive capacity.&#8221;  Thus, the Obamacare statute mandates that employer group health plans cover all FDA-approved contraceptive methods, including contraception, sterilization procedures, and &#8220;emergency contraception&#8221; (as the FDA calls the Plan B, Plan B One-Step, Next Choice, and Ella &#8220;morning-after&#8221; pills). 
 
It doesn&#039;t exist in law? It already does.  
 
These people are not forcing anyone to carry a child because of their religious beliefs. They are not trying to have contraceptives banned for anyone, they are protesting being forced to pay for contraception for others (with contraception being a violation of their religious beliefs). Being forced to do anything that violates their religious beliefs is therefore a  violation of religious freedom. The only infantile backwards notion here is that they are trying to force their viewpoint on anyone, when in fact they are defending it. It is liberals like you who have been trying to use the law to force their viewpoints on people for the past 50 years - project much, do we? 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Section 2713 of the Public Health Service Act, enacted by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148) (the &ldquo;Obamacare&rdquo; statute), provides that &ldquo;A group health plan and a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage shall, at a minimum provide coverage for and shall not impose any cost sharing requirements for&mdash; . . . (4) with respect to women, such additional preventive care and screenings . . . as provided for in comprehensive guidelines supported by the Health Resources and Services Administration . . . .&rdquo; </p>
<p>Those HRSA guidelines currently provide for &ldquo;All Food and Drug Administration approved contraceptive methods, sterilization procedures, and patient education and counseling for all women with reproductive capacity.&rdquo;  Thus, the Obamacare statute mandates that employer group health plans cover all FDA-approved contraceptive methods, including contraception, sterilization procedures, and &ldquo;emergency contraception&rdquo; (as the FDA calls the Plan B, Plan B One-Step, Next Choice, and Ella &ldquo;morning-after&rdquo; pills). </p>
<p>It doesn&#039;t exist in law? It already does.  </p>
<p>These people are not forcing anyone to carry a child because of their religious beliefs. They are not trying to have contraceptives banned for anyone, they are protesting being forced to pay for contraception for others (with contraception being a violation of their religious beliefs). Being forced to do anything that violates their religious beliefs is therefore a  violation of religious freedom. The only infantile backwards notion here is that they are trying to force their viewpoint on anyone, when in fact they are defending it. It is liberals like you who have been trying to use the law to force their viewpoints on people for the past 50 years &#8211; project much, do we? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Kendrick</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/volpe/fighting-for-religious-freedom-in-the-obama-era/comment-page-1/#comment-3730598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Kendrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 22:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=159877#comment-3730598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know what to say.  The mandate say no such thing.  The people protesting &#039;religious freedom&#039; are protesting an illusion.  What they&#039;re protesting doesn&#039;t exist and will not exist in law.  In addition, what the protesters are advocating is called pro-pregnancy.  Forcing someone unrelated to you to carry a child because of your personal religious beliefs is Taliban-like in it&#039;s origin and nature.  It has absolutely nothing to do with religious freedom.  It has everything to do with forcing your personal religious viewpoint onto everyone in this nation.   
 
Please give up your infantile Bronze Age tribal mindset and enter the 21st century.  The contraception issue has been settled for 50 years.  You all are living in the past.  50 YEARS IN THE PAST.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what to say.  The mandate say no such thing.  The people protesting &#039;religious freedom&#039; are protesting an illusion.  What they&#039;re protesting doesn&#039;t exist and will not exist in law.  In addition, what the protesters are advocating is called pro-pregnancy.  Forcing someone unrelated to you to carry a child because of your personal religious beliefs is Taliban-like in it&#039;s origin and nature.  It has absolutely nothing to do with religious freedom.  It has everything to do with forcing your personal religious viewpoint onto everyone in this nation.   </p>
<p>Please give up your infantile Bronze Age tribal mindset and enter the 21st century.  The contraception issue has been settled for 50 years.  You all are living in the past.  50 YEARS IN THE PAST.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghostwriter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/volpe/fighting-for-religious-freedom-in-the-obama-era/comment-page-1/#comment-3729642</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghostwriter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 20:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=159877#comment-3729642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure what to say. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m not sure what to say. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 391/396 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 01:53:17 by W3 Total Cache -->