The Film ‘Innocence of Muslims’ — Made By Terrorists?

Pages: 1 2

We also ascertained from our contact in the Canadian Peel Police that Eiad was also involved with someone with a last name “Tanas” and Nakoula had used the name “Thomas J. Tanas.”

Both clans “Nakoula” and “Tanas” exist in Eiad’s village in Beit Sahour, Bethlehem. It is still the little town of Bethlehem as it was in biblical times.

Now let’s examine his motives.

I obtained the Sawa radio interview in Arabic of this supposed Nakoula. He was asked, “What is your position on the Jewish and the Christian faiths?” Nakoula responded, “I have no calling for these religions.” He continued to state that he was an author of several anti-Islam books (written in Arabic) refusing to give the titles of his books.

Yet, if court documents give his legal name as Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, I found no books under that name. Nothing. And neither was anyone able to produce any.

The media’s narrative has nothing, and this supposed Nakoula was proven a liar a hundred times over.

Yet the media purports that the man is a Christian activist Copt. All this man’s claims were proven lies, except this one is believed?

Even what his friend stated to the court — that Nakoula is “a God-fearing man whose first priority is his family” — contradicts what he said in Arabic; he is not interested in Christianity or Judaism and is possibly a Muslim.

So who funded the film? Nakoula claimed that he produced the film with money ($50,000 to $60,000) that came from his wife’s family in Egypt.

None of this has been proven.

What has been proven is that he embezzled millions with Eiad. The money must have come from these scandalous operations, which our government finally admitted is linked to terrorist activity.

Whoever made this film claimed Jews funded him and that he was a Copt, and obviously intended to do harm to his real enemies—Israel and the Copts.

Both Copts and Israel are Eiad’s ardent enemies.

Now to prove beyond a shadow of doubt that the feds were complicit: the Justice Department lawyers and federal agents, despite Nakoula’s two previous offenses, defended Nakoula and gave several excuses to Judge Snyder and pushed for leniency, all because he supposedly promised to help them catch Eiad:

[H]e [Nakoula] has implicated Mr. Salamay [aka Salameh] there is no question that Mr. Salamay at some point is gonna be indicted if he hasn’t already been… we all know what’s gonna happen. Salamay is gonna get arrested some day and based on the debriefing information turned over he is gonna enter a guilty plea, or if he doesn’t, then Mr. Nakoula is going to be called in to testify…” [see sentencing transcript].

If the feds were indeed looking to catch Eiad, he had in fact been doing his shenanigans for three decades, warrants were issued, his location was known and no arrests were ever made, in thirty some years.

The evidence compounds. Eiad was not, however, immune in Canada and was finally caught and locked up there in January 2011. We have emails from the Canadian Peel Police who wrote us. The Canadians wanted to keep Eiad in custody as long as it took to extradite him to the United States, yet the U.S. refused for seven months to take him and preferred to fly him to Palestine.

On July 15th, 2011, the Canadians wrote me: “He is awaiting deportation to Palestine, unless the US hurry up and indict him…” The feds never responded to the Canadian’s last appeal and within a few days, Eiad was sent to Palestine.

I realize that people might try to shoot holes in what we are saying, yet, the media has very little evidence to prove its narrative, while we present many validated facts.

The results of this entire fiasco will not be the apprehension of terrorists, but the continual chipping away at the First Amendment.

Unfortunately, many Americans still practice self-blame. The film was made in the U.S., a nation that is not used to schemes like Muhammad Al Dura or what was shown in Paliwood.

Welcome to Paliwood II.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Pages: 1 2

  • zionit

    Thank you for your article. It's this self-blame, along with constant dissembling, that is the stealth weapon in the current war of attrition against the American Constitution.

  • objectivefactsmatter

    Even before I read this Shoebat connection, my gut told me that this was orchestrated with the explicit purpose of creating a new libel. The entire result was manufactured outrage among predictable populations.

    • Lee

      I believe this film was made to cover up what was going to go down in Bengazi ahead of time. By this man a federal snith

  • http://www.facebook.com/larry.kroger.5 Larry Kroger

    I'm not sure Shoebat's theory adds up. Yes, I'll accept there are people out there manufacturing disinformation and feeding conflicts. And Nakoula's checkered past makes it easier to believe his claims aren't on the level. But even so, what purpose would creating this video serve if it's not what it seems to be, which is a zero-budget zero-talent hit piece? Is there any shortage of similarly obscure and unimportant material that would be regarded as equally offensive? Didn't this video sit around in obscurity for months, and nobody cared about it? It would seem to me that if someone wanted to create an incident, they'd just pick something randomly; no need to pay money and go through shadowy connections to create it. For this reason, I was assuming Nakoula's film gained global notoriety only through the luck of the draw. The connections Shoebat observes are odd, and I'm not dismissing what he alleges, but you see why I get the sense something isn't right.

    • Walid Shoebat

      Larry,

      I hear you, but could ask you the same question: what purpose would creating this video serve? The media narrative says it was a Copt Christian activist. Can you prove that this is the case? If so, then what is the motive? Especially that Nakoula said he was Israeli Jew? That he funded the film from Jews? Why all the deception?
      In other words, its fine to disagree with me, then you need to show why you DO agree with the other narrative–the Media. And if you reject the media's narrative, what then is this man's motive behind the film?

      As to the movie "sitting in obscurity for months" argument. Indeed, Muslims hardly pay attention to the stuff westerners post on youtube, it took Bakkar of the Salafist party and Dar Al-Hekma to execute a plan. If you read my previous work on how the M.B worked that out you might just get it. Walid

      • Schlomotion

        Maybe, like you, he was just being a sleazy opportunist. This was a pretty good expose on you, Mr. Shoebat. What do you have to say about it? Is CNN controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood?
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04yWUuoU7Lc

        • Pontotoc Bill

          SchloMo, you are the font of useless knowledge and inane comments. You are a liar about Mr. Shoebat.

          Prove what you say, instead of committing the crime of slander, mental midget.

          • Schlomotion

            I disagree. The video demonstrates that he is clearly a hustler who makes a lot of money off of our tax dollars selling fake expertise in remote parts of the US.

        • FPF

          Talking about Mr. Shoebat is making a lot of money, he probably doesn't make as much as Cooper does, nor as much as the leaders in Palestine and Egypt. 'None of your business' is a correct response, consider persecuted Infidels in the Islam country, if CNN get the detail about those information, the humanitarian operations will be exposed and many people's lives will be endangered. Just like this Administration helped Pakistan government to jail a local doctor who unknowingly helped Navy Seal to kill bin Laden and allowed Obama to claim the credit. As why there's no record for he being jailed in Israel, he probably was using a fake ID. It's very common tactic in this kind of warfare. You probably can do better than claiming CNN report is the only truth without giving any reasonable doubt.

          • Commies Lie

            Exactly. Communist News Network can't be trusted.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            "As why there's no record for he being jailed in Israel, he probably was using a fake ID."

            As I recall, they checked his alias (Shoebat) rather than the authentic name he was born with.

    • cognitionemission

      your argument can be turned on its head, so it doesn't stand up.

  • pierre

    Cherchez la femme………..
    Who benefits from crime? Cui bono?

    The rubbish film was a tripe made for useful idiots.
    Same effectiveness as in third Reich's Propaganda: same toxicity…
    our future ? rounding off Shoa !

    AMERICAN CITIZEN WAKE UP, BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE, AGAIN !!,

  • http://www.facebook.com/daniel.teeboom Daniel Teeboom

    It's a set-up!

    Take a look at this 'movie'. Does this strike you as a product that wants to inform an audience about the prophet Muhammad or Islam? I mean, it's unbearable to watch. There is not much of a story, it's very short, the characters look silly, the props are ridiculous, the acting is bad, and the dubbing horrendous.

    Who will watch it?

    Regarding that dubbing. The actors did not know what this movie was about. The script, they say, never mentioned Mohammed. All references to Islam were added in later.

    I think those actors weren't the only ones that were set-up.

    Why did the maker of this movie, Sam Becile, claim he was an Israeli Jew and why did he claim that 100 Jewish donors paid for this ridiculous little movie? What purpose does such a claim have other than to increase tensions? Antisemitism, paranoia and hatred for Israel reigns supreme in the Middle East. Everybody knows what will happen when Muslims believe Israeli Jews banded together to make a movie in order to insult their prophet Mohammed. Muslims will go berserk. Which is exactly what had happened.

    Sam Becile, also know as Nakoula Basseley, meanwhile claims he got the money from his family in Egypt. Would you pay your distant family member to make a movie from a script he wrote in prison? How likely is that? Do you think whoever paid that money made a wise investment?

    Well that really depends on the purpose of this movie, don't you think? If this movie was intended to inform and teach it is a major failure. I would want my money back. But if it was intended to inflame, if its purpose was to be a pretext for global Intifada to be launched against American interests on the anniversary of 9/11 well then it is an excellent movie and a great investment. It's not too expensive, 'Mohammed' appears as a Caucasian so you know whom to kill. It's amateurish and ridiculous which makes an ass out of whoever wants to defend it in the name of freedom of speech.

    Follow the money. Who really provided Sam Becile with the funding for this movie? Was it Iran, or some Islamist movement? Al Qaida perhaps? Remember that the pilots who committed the original 9/11 attacks also trained in the US.

    • LibertarianToo

      You ask "who will watch it?" The same people who watch blood libel dramas and think the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" is evidence of something. The muslim world is not real big on skepticism or critical thought.

      • Commies Lie

        Agreed. All the inbreeding makes critical thought an impossibility for these people.

  • http://www.facebook.com/daniel.teeboom Daniel Teeboom

    It's a set-up!

    Take a look at this 'movie'. Does this strike you as a product that wants to inform an audience about the prophet Muhammad or Islam? I mean, it's unbearable to watch. There is not much of a story, it's very short, the characters look silly, the props are ridiculous, the acting is bad, and the dubbing horrendous.

    Who will watch it?

    Regarding that dubbing. The actors did not know what this movie was about. The script, they say, never mentioned Mohammed. All references to Islam were added in later.

    I think those actors weren't the only ones that were set-up.

    Why did the maker of this movie, Sam Becile, claim he was an Israeli Jew and why did he claim that 100 Jewish donors paid for this ridiculous little movie? What purpose does such a claim have other than to increase tensions? Antisemitism, paranoia and hatred for Israel reigns supreme in the Middle East. Everybody knows what will happen when Muslims believe Israeli Jews banded together to make a movie in order to insult their prophet Mohammed. Muslims will go berserk. Which is exactly what had happened.

    Sam Becile, also know as Nakoula Basseley, meanwhile claims he got the money from his family in Egypt. Would you pay your distant family member to make a movie from a script he wrote in prison? How likely is that? Do you think whoever paid that money made a wise investment?

    Well that really depends on the purpose of this movie, don't you think? If this movie was intended to inform and teach it is a major failure. I would want my money back. But if it was intended to inflame, if its purpose was to be a pretext for global Intifada to be launched against American interests on the anniversary of 9/11 well then it is an excellent movie and a great investment. It's not too expensive, 'Mohammed' appears as a Caucasian so you know whom to kill. It's amateurish and ridiculous which makes an ass out of whoever wants to defend it in the name of freedom of speech.

    Follow the money. Who really provided Sam Becile with the funding for this movie? Was it Iran, or some Islamist movement? Al Qaida perhaps? Remember that the pilots who committed the original 9/11 attacks also trained in the US.

  • davarino

    So much subterfuge, smoke and mirrors with this president. We are in big trouble if Obama the destroyer is re-elected.

    • lee

      Hmmmmmmmm, do you think ??

  • Schlomotion

    It's all in the family.

  • Cat Kid

    Why does Judge Snyder and “the Canadians” who wrote to the author both speak ‘pigeon’ English? That’s just strange. But, I do think the author is on to something here about the background and intent of the filmmaker. However, I read a similar suggestion when the Muslim murders of the American ambassador and the muslim rioting first occurred. It is the first thing that crossed my mind. Otherwise, why would a man say he is an Israeli Jew or working with Israelis and then change that story? To blame Jews, of course. And while Copts are often as anti-Semitic as Muslims, it still made little sense.
    I can’t help but conclude that we, Americans, can never know who any Muslim truly is. Even, the author of this article.
    When lies are honorable then anyone, anyone, of that culture/faith/background may be telling lies. Be it Shoebat or the current president of the United States.
    What a world!

  • Rifleman

    It wouldn't surprise me a bit, and it reinforces my belief that hte jihadis will never lack an excuse to attack and kill us. If they ever need one, they can create the excuse themselves. After all, their fame and livelihoods depend on their waging jihad against the West.

    Our own race pimps are similar, the way they depend on racial distrust and animosity, so will help it along, every chance they get.

  • http://www.facebook.com/oliver.grant.311 Oliver Grant

    The movie poster was written in pro-Al Queda code – "Innocence of Bin laden" which promised to expose America as the true terrorist killing muslims in Palestine, Iraq and Afghanistan. The only thing on the internet which matches this ideological fingerprint is Gordon Duff's "Osama bin Laden: Closing the Case on an Innocent Man". Any American who works this hard to try to promote Bin Laden's innocence is somebody the US government should be interested in, especially if he is senior editor of Veterans Today which looks like an unofficial PR agency of iran's PressTV. Why isn't anybody asking about Iranian connections to the Ghadaffi loyalists who are now blamed by Libya's government for the well-organized killing that looks like it was done by an Islamist version of Seal Team Six? http://ninjapundit.blogspot.com/2012/09/ideologic

  • LibertarianToo

    So the Obama administration is either stupid or complicit. Even money at this point.

  • LindaRivera

    In the full text of his UN speech, Obama declared: "The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam."
    One blogger has stated about Obama's declaration: "I consider that statement a death threat to me and all anti-Islam
    bloggers, authors, and activists by the President of the United States…" End of quote.

    When DECEIVER, Barack Hussein Obama declared: “The future
    must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” he meant
    those who tell the TRUTH about Islam.

    Barbaric mass murderer and huge slave trader, founder of Islam,
    Mohammad, who married a six year old child when he was in his fifties,
    declared: WAR IS DECEPTION.

    U.S. ruling elites spit on the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights,
    our patriotism to America and on the graves of every brave hero who
    fought and died in the Second World War so that we could live in FREEDOM
    and SAFETY. And they spit on the graves of the European heroes who
    centuries ago, fought desperate battles to stop the cruel, barbaric
    Muslim invaders.

    The Obama-Clinton administration are eager to wage WAR against hated
    non-Muslim infidels, especially those who tell the TRUTH about Islam.

    • trickyblain

      "…declared: WAR IS DECEPTION. "

      Linda, that was Sun Tzu in the Art of War. And he was right.

      • objectivefactsmatter

        Mohammed also said something paraphrased to indicate the same thing.

  • http://www.facebook.com/oliver.grant.311 Oliver Grant

    This successful attack which nearly wiped out a squadron of harriers in afghanistan was blamed on rage over the video: http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/attack
    The Marines have never sustained these losses in a unit since the Japanese Imperial forces bombed Wake Island.
    These Taliban are a serious threat, no matter what Biden said:

    "Look, the Taliban per se is not our enemy. That's critical," Biden said. "There is not a single statement that the president has ever made in any of our policy assertions that the Taliban is our enemy, because it threatens U.S. interests. If, in fact, the Taliban is able to collapse the existing government, which is cooperating with us in keeping the bad guys from being able to do damage to us, then that becomes a problem for us."

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/12/19/white-

  • hologram5

    This wouldn't surprise me one bit although I do have my reservations that they would be that smart as to create something like this just to have another reason to protest, kill and destroy. It really doesn't take much for them to go off the handle these days anyways.

  • cognitionemission

    More evidence that the video was a false flag:

    The agitators in the middle east who blamed this video for the violence were placing blame on a "Coptic Conspiracy" long before the identity of Nakoula was ever known.

    Also, Nakoula lists a speech by the leader of the radical ISLAMIST Al Nour Party as his one (and only) "favorite" Youtube video.

    • http://www.facebook.com/oliver.grant.311 Oliver Grant

      Finally someone who looked at the youtube channel. His claim to be Israeli could also be seen to bogus because comments and info were written in Arabic.

      • objectivefactsmatter

        " His claim to be Israeli could also be seen to bogus because comments and info were written in Arabic."

        The comments were pro-Islam. That is the issue, not the language used.

  • scarletworm

    Agent provocateurs- go figure.This information is mind blowing. Mr. Horowitz has hinted about the role that our government has played in this Shakespearean tragedy- I look forward to his comments being more direct. I hope he can bring this story to light. Thank you for putting yourself out there.

  • fanlad

    The fires that this administration have started in this region in the name of " Arab Spring", have now become uncontrollable wild fires. What did our parents teach us? Do not play with fire, ( Radical Socialist, Communist, and Radical Jihadist ). The arsonist have started an Arab wild fire that will now consume Israel, America, Europe, and the Middle East. Where is a fire fighter when you need one?
    Time for truth and real change in November.

  • Solidspine

    It seems to obvious, and frankly the film seems way to ACCURATE To have been made by muslims,

    I do not understand

    Why the media has to focus on the specific acting style, not quality, just style,

    Is it different, yes

    Is it bad, I say no

    So the answer is arguably debatable, or the answer is simply not important.

    What is important is the films content and message.

    That Islam is a dangerous disease that needs to be irradiated and it may require that many Arab, or Ahab or other people who are now Muslims lose their life.

    Individuals that promote the violence, filth, noise, and smell of Islam Need to be severely punished immediately.

    Islam needs to be stopped. It is a murderous cult, Islam needs to be stopped every where immediately and permanently forever

  • christine

    Thank you Walid. Now, if you can get the MSM to report this.Why has this man now disappeared after all this? I knew something wasn't right about the story all along. Please follow up on the man. Thank you again.

    • http://www.facebook.com/oliver.grant.311 Oliver Grant

      Mr Shoebat was on America's Morning News Monday morning Oct 1, that's almost mainstream, but it wasn't obvious that the video was created by terrorists to justify terror. Mr. Shoebat, your people asked me to give you information that linked the video to Iran, but you said that you could not follow the leads

      Iranian public relations (PressTV, GlobalResearch.CA, Veterans Today, Alex Jones) is pointing fingers everywhere – Saudi Arabia, the Libyan government that NATO supported, Israel, and even accusing Mitt Romney and/or Israel of ordering the assasination of the ambassador. The last one smells like Charles Stuart of Boston who shot his own wife and blamed it on a non-existent African American. People/nations who create obvious conspiracy theores accusing the obviously innocent MAY be covering up something that they did.
      * Romney ordered the killing: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/09/23/press-tv-
      * Saudi Arabia did it: "Libya security forces stepped aside and watched the attack unfolded when the Saudi backed Salafi Jihadists became violent" http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2012/09/12/ambas
      What we know:
      * Bank cyber attacks blamed the video, US sources say IRAN IS USING VIDEO AS COVER FOR ATTACKS
      * Iran HATES the Libyan government, US and NATO
      * Iran morally supports the same Ghaddafi loyalists = Green Resistance http://www.globalresearch.ca/libyas-green-resista
      * Iran is the only obvious terrorist state which has the intelligence resources and logistics to assist or execute the plan which resembled an Islamist Seal Team 6 with 14.5mm gun trucks, RPG, ak-47, and accurate mortar fire attacking from 3 directions simultaneously
      * Iran supplies arms/support to Hamas, Hezbollah, Taliban, and probably KONY, and probably is behind the arms smuggling from Libya to gaza and lebanon. Stevens is rumoured to be on a mission with ex-seals to investigate and stop the arms smuggling.

  • donaldyoungsrevenge

    The entire Libya incident was a Middle East Fast and Furious CIA Gun Operation gone bad and the administration needed a cover. The cover was so pitiful that many have seen right through it. Stevens use his ambassadorship as a cover, the Navy Seals were rounding up guns for months (see ABC interview with one of the Navy Seals two weeks before the murders). The tweet from vile-rat was not a tweet to his gaming friends, only a fool would believe that. They were in the process of trading the Blind Sheikh for the weapons and it went horribly bad. End of story.

  • weroinnm

    My following blog post contains numerous articles and/or blog posts and videos that reveal the disastrous results of: 1) the Islamic and Communist infiltration inside our government and our military, to include the President's secret link to Hamas and Communists; 2) the President's connection to George Soros; and 3) the shared agendas of George Soros and the President:
    The Vetting: ‘Obama, Radical Islam and the Soros Connection’! (Part 4): http://wethepeopleusa.ning.com/profiles/blogs/the
    “Food For Thought”
    Semper Fi!

  • US Muslim

    Very interesting article for a change coming from Mr. Ibrahim, for once. It could be that he's right here…sure looks very professionally researched. Wonder why the rest of our "free press" hasn't picked this up?? Never mind…there's a lot of obvious stuff that they don't 't bother to pick up anyway. I don't expect them to carry out the equivalent of post-graduate journalistic research when they can't even seem to recite their ABCs correctly…

  • BUTSeriously

    Nae of the game is "TAQIYYAH" – an Islamic doctrine whereby Allah accepts lies with a wink and tap on the shoulder. It is a polar contradiction of the Hebrew God, which commands:

    "YOU SHALL NOT LIE TO THE STRANGER"
    "YOU SHALL NOT CHEAT THE STRANGER"

    For Jews, it is a greater crime to lie to a non-Jew than it is to lie to another Jew.

  • http://www.facebook.com/oliver.grant.311 Oliver Grant

    Mr. Shoebat, Gordon "Patriots for Iran" Duff has evidently revealed the extent of the actual operation, but has merely exchanged the name of the nation who did it with those that did not do it. The way to read disinformation is that they want to be believe the opposite of the truth, so if the message here is that the US/israel did a false flag attack, the truth would be .. that Iran executed a false flag attack. It is my belief that 95% of the bloggers and websites linked into the PressTV / VeteransToday / American Free Press 9-11truth/RonPaul Supporter/Pro-Palestine/anti-Semitic/HolocaustDenier/Islamist/White nationalist network is controlled by Iranian intelligence
    ] http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/09/22/findings-
    Now key admissions of the nature of the attack make it virtually impossible for any Libyan group to have been involved, a story now being “sold” to the press along with Libyan reprisals.