<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Cowards Are Pushing Women into Combat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: ADM64</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5409084</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ADM64]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5409084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The combat exclusion was lifted in 1994.  The separate Women&#039;s Corps (WACs, WAVEs etc) were disbanded in 1976, I believe.  So, yes, it is more like 38 years since we started the coed experiment.  I am dubious that even the 2% could keep up once they got out of their 20&#039;s.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The combat exclusion was lifted in 1994.  The separate Women&#8217;s Corps (WACs, WAVEs etc) were disbanded in 1976, I believe.  So, yes, it is more like 38 years since we started the coed experiment.  I am dubious that even the 2% could keep up once they got out of their 20&#8242;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herb benty</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5408840</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[herb benty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5408840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hollywood has played a huge part in this fiasco. Remember &quot;Threes Company&quot; with John Ritter playing the cool wimp. Many other examples.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hollywood has played a huge part in this fiasco. Remember &#8220;Threes Company&#8221; with John Ritter playing the cool wimp. Many other examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5408835</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john walsh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5408835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good quote. Romans chapter one explains the issue of homsexuality. But how does this explain the issue with feminism????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good quote. Romans chapter one explains the issue of homsexuality. But how does this explain the issue with feminism????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5408834</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john walsh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5408834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[20 years ago?? More like 38. Those 2 % women you&#039;re talking about will suffer heart attacts a lot quicker than their male counterr parts, and most likely get breast cancer, sooner than any other women would.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20 years ago?? More like 38. Those 2 % women you&#8217;re talking about will suffer heart attacts a lot quicker than their male counterr parts, and most likely get breast cancer, sooner than any other women would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5408828</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john walsh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 15:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5408828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many of the beta men, who were the small minority, back in the day. Like Bobby Riggs. He sold us out, by deliberitly throwing that tennis match with Billy Jean King.  Booby Riggs was a closet case feminits male. just putting on an act portraying he was a male chauvinist.  But he had an aganda.  An the ends always justifies the means. Since then, many alpha men for some reason decided, to join the band wagon, and turned into beta man. And they to sold us out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of the beta men, who were the small minority, back in the day. Like Bobby Riggs. He sold us out, by deliberitly throwing that tennis match with Billy Jean King.  Booby Riggs was a closet case feminits male. just putting on an act portraying he was a male chauvinist.  But he had an aganda.  An the ends always justifies the means. Since then, many alpha men for some reason decided, to join the band wagon, and turned into beta man. And they to sold us out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5408829</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john walsh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 15:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5408829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would say 35 % to 45 %.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say 35 % to 45 %.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5408810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john walsh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5408810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They did it for womens lib, not for god and country.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They did it for womens lib, not for god and country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5408809</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john walsh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5408809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes. Medical, food service, administartion, communications. Meaning the trational ( natrual ) feminum occupations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Medical, food service, administartion, communications. Meaning the trational ( natrual ) feminum occupations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5408808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john walsh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5408808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NOW I call that Nasty Oders of Witches. YEAH. They would say that is a good idea, but they know in reality it wouldn&#039;t work. They would have a chance with an all female enemy element , but not against an all male. The NOWs talk the talk, but not walk the walk.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOW I call that Nasty Oders of Witches. YEAH. They would say that is a good idea, but they know in reality it wouldn&#8217;t work. They would have a chance with an all female enemy element , but not against an all male. The NOWs talk the talk, but not walk the walk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5408805</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john walsh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5408805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Either way, they would be wiped-out. That&#039;s if they came across an all male enemy unit, of the same size.  Tell the me the odds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either way, they would be wiped-out. That&#8217;s if they came across an all male enemy unit, of the same size.  Tell the me the odds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5408802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john walsh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5408802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to many Alpha men. I agree. Now we have to many beta men, or DUDTUSERS. They rather have a girl play football , than their son. They rather have  their daughter fly , than their son. Our soceity is very corupt, in the 21 st century.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to many Alpha men. I agree. Now we have to many beta men, or DUDTUSERS. They rather have a girl play football , than their son. They rather have  their daughter fly , than their son. Our soceity is very corupt, in the 21 st century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5408800</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john walsh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 15:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5408800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting not even the Nazis put women in combat during WW II. But the Soveits did. Which is why again Germany penitrted deep into Russian land.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting not even the Nazis put women in combat during WW II. But the Soveits did. Which is why again Germany penitrted deep into Russian land.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5408799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john walsh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5408799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[or beta males. Also known as this one I made-up. DUDTUSERS( Dads Using Daughters To Undermine Sons Empowerment Role)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or beta males. Also known as this one I made-up. DUDTUSERS( Dads Using Daughters To Undermine Sons Empowerment Role)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5408797</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john walsh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5408797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with your post. However, the bulk of the phyiscall issue is the burden with females.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your post. However, the bulk of the phyiscall issue is the burden with females.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5408795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[john walsh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5408795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Mr. Horred for bringing this to light. Especailly about when the Soveit Union using women in combat. I think they were better-off, not having females in the military combat in the first place. They wouldn&#039;t have suffered as many casulities, and the Gereman Forces wouldn&#039;t have penatrated as far as they did, eastward into Russian land.  Intesresting too, that we have been in Afganistan for about 13 years, and still no victory in sight???? And now Al qida occupies many cities in Iraq???? HHHHMMMMM.  Also don&#039;t read anything military dot com and yahoo news reports. It&#039;s just more feminist propaganda.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Mr. Horred for bringing this to light. Especailly about when the Soveit Union using women in combat. I think they were better-off, not having females in the military combat in the first place. They wouldn&#8217;t have suffered as many casulities, and the Gereman Forces wouldn&#8217;t have penatrated as far as they did, eastward into Russian land.  Intesresting too, that we have been in Afganistan for about 13 years, and still no victory in sight???? And now Al qida occupies many cities in Iraq???? HHHHMMMMM.  Also don&#8217;t read anything military dot com and yahoo news reports. It&#8217;s just more feminist propaganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blade</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5273205</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5273205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Readers, only having been part of conflicts since Panama to the present, I am sure that my comments may not rank with many of the more senior veterans who have something to say.  However, what I can say is that, our biggest issue begins with a current lack of knowlegde about history. Remember when leaders would meet with past Presidents, Cabinet members, etc, from past war eras to get there opinions? This information provided in this article and the daily actions by this administration, shows that its interest is in capturing the minds of the youth who have no idea what we are talking about. Remember the President&#039;s goal is to &quot;Fundamentally change the US&quot;.
Based on my military and edcuational training, there have been thousands of years, thousands of conflicts, and the acient books written on warfare, strategy, tactics, (none, which cover the long term use of women in combat) these have not been seen as important books today.  
Finally, the one thing we all see, know, and most are afraid to admit, is that this is another addition to our decaying moral fabric.  When we forsake our belief in Christ (or for some a set of moral values)  to for the sake of inclusion we are bound to suffer or perish.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Readers, only having been part of conflicts since Panama to the present, I am sure that my comments may not rank with many of the more senior veterans who have something to say.  However, what I can say is that, our biggest issue begins with a current lack of knowlegde about history. Remember when leaders would meet with past Presidents, Cabinet members, etc, from past war eras to get there opinions? This information provided in this article and the daily actions by this administration, shows that its interest is in capturing the minds of the youth who have no idea what we are talking about. Remember the President&#8217;s goal is to &#8220;Fundamentally change the US&#8221;.<br />
Based on my military and edcuational training, there have been thousands of years, thousands of conflicts, and the acient books written on warfare, strategy, tactics, (none, which cover the long term use of women in combat) these have not been seen as important books today.<br />
Finally, the one thing we all see, know, and most are afraid to admit, is that this is another addition to our decaying moral fabric.  When we forsake our belief in Christ (or for some a set of moral values)  to for the sake of inclusion we are bound to suffer or perish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADM64</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5273198</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ADM64]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5273198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As with an earlier article on this subject a few days ago, the problem is that ever since most of the jobs in the armed forces were opened to women in 1993, everyone has proclaimed the result a success and now trots out the same arguements used against those changes back then.  It is not a strategy that will convince anyone.  Rather, one has to recognize that all of the problems predicted 20 years ago - problems of lowered standards, of fraternization, pregnancy and sexual harassment - have come to pass.  We have simply not taken the consequences because neither the Navy nor the Air Force have engaged a competitive enemy during this time (neither has the Army or the Marines but they are still fighting at a more intense level than their two more technology-oriented sister services).  To the extent that there have been problems, they have been swept under the rug, mostly because no one wants to be accused of sexism nor to trash our servicewomen.  Well, I applaud the willingness to serve of those women who want to do so, but I condemn their acceptance of &quot;opportunity&quot; at the expense of performance, particularly amongst the officers.  In the final analysis, no matter how willing, patriotic or enthusiastic a woman, if she can&#039;t meet all of the same standards as a man, she has no business in the military.  And, if the only reason she can&#039;t meet the standards is because she is a woman, and men and women are different, than too bad.

To my mind, the simple test of the current policies should be the claims made for them on behalf of their advocates.  Twenty years ago - indeed twenty years before that when the Womens&#039; Auxiliaries were rolled into the regular forces and the service academies went coed - two claims were made:  first there would be no adjustment to standard and second that all of the problems of fraternization, pregnancy and sexual harassement could be dealt with by proper &quot;leadership,&quot;  &quot;discipline&quot; and &quot;training.&quot;  Neither claim has panned out.  There is no evidence at all that more than 2% of American women could perform physically to the standard of an average male; so standards were adjusted to achieve a critical mass of women in the forces.  Every time we increase the roles in which women can serve, fraternization, pregnancy and other sexual problems increase in number, despite also ever increasing amounts of &quot;training.&quot;  Only the political left, pro-government types, and the fairness-blinded &quot;white knight&quot; sort of man
thinks this constitutes &quot;success.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with an earlier article on this subject a few days ago, the problem is that ever since most of the jobs in the armed forces were opened to women in 1993, everyone has proclaimed the result a success and now trots out the same arguements used against those changes back then.  It is not a strategy that will convince anyone.  Rather, one has to recognize that all of the problems predicted 20 years ago &#8211; problems of lowered standards, of fraternization, pregnancy and sexual harassment &#8211; have come to pass.  We have simply not taken the consequences because neither the Navy nor the Air Force have engaged a competitive enemy during this time (neither has the Army or the Marines but they are still fighting at a more intense level than their two more technology-oriented sister services).  To the extent that there have been problems, they have been swept under the rug, mostly because no one wants to be accused of sexism nor to trash our servicewomen.  Well, I applaud the willingness to serve of those women who want to do so, but I condemn their acceptance of &#8220;opportunity&#8221; at the expense of performance, particularly amongst the officers.  In the final analysis, no matter how willing, patriotic or enthusiastic a woman, if she can&#8217;t meet all of the same standards as a man, she has no business in the military.  And, if the only reason she can&#8217;t meet the standards is because she is a woman, and men and women are different, than too bad.</p>
<p>To my mind, the simple test of the current policies should be the claims made for them on behalf of their advocates.  Twenty years ago &#8211; indeed twenty years before that when the Womens&#8217; Auxiliaries were rolled into the regular forces and the service academies went coed &#8211; two claims were made:  first there would be no adjustment to standard and second that all of the problems of fraternization, pregnancy and sexual harassement could be dealt with by proper &#8220;leadership,&#8221;  &#8220;discipline&#8221; and &#8220;training.&#8221;  Neither claim has panned out.  There is no evidence at all that more than 2% of American women could perform physically to the standard of an average male; so standards were adjusted to achieve a critical mass of women in the forces.  Every time we increase the roles in which women can serve, fraternization, pregnancy and other sexual problems increase in number, despite also ever increasing amounts of &#8220;training.&#8221;  Only the political left, pro-government types, and the fairness-blinded &#8220;white knight&#8221; sort of man<br />
thinks this constitutes &#8220;success.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A woman</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5272989</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A woman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5272989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am thankful for such men as Mr. Harrod presents who still represent real men and protector of true women. Thank you Mr. Harrod for this article.

Romans chapter 1
21 For even though they knew God, they did not [n]honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. . . .24 Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them. 25 For they exchanged the truth of God for [p]a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed [q]forever. Amen. 26 For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is [r]unnatural, 27 and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing [s]indecent acts and receiving in [t]their own persons the due penalty of their error.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am thankful for such men as Mr. Harrod presents who still represent real men and protector of true women. Thank you Mr. Harrod for this article.</p>
<p>Romans chapter 1<br />
21 For even though they knew God, they did not [n]honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations, and their foolish heart was darkened. . . .24 Therefore God gave them over in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, so that their bodies would be dishonored among them. 25 For they exchanged the truth of God for [p]a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed [q]forever. Amen. 26 For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is [r]unnatural, 27 and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing [s]indecent acts and receiving in [t]their own persons the due penalty of their error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrontPgSubscr</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5272781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FrontPgSubscr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5272781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EXACTLY as stated ... only COWARDS hide behind women!! (What 
brought us to this point?????)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EXACTLY as stated &#8230; only COWARDS hide behind women!! (What<br />
brought us to this point?????)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herb benty</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/how-cowards-are-pushing-women-into-combat/comment-page-1/#comment-5272763</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[herb benty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203592#comment-5272763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Men are BORN with 30% more muscles than women...for starters. Our enemies will certainly adore the idea!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Men are BORN with 30% more muscles than women&#8230;for starters. Our enemies will certainly adore the idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 693/729 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 13:00:22 by W3 Total Cache -->