<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Undaunted: Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff’s Fight for Free Speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 11:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5248238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5248238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has religious and political elements. We can&#039;t say that it&#039;s not a religion, but we can say that Islam is totalitarian and not limited to individual religious activities. In the USA we protect individual liberties. We should not protect people from engaging in conspiracies to break our laws. There seems to be a lot of people are are deceived.

Considering mosques as equally deserving of sanctity as a &quot;place of worship&quot; is the perfect example to show the problems. Sure, people lawfully worship there in a sense. But by Islamic law and custom these are also war rooms. They habitually store arms there and plan conspiracies against sovereigns. They&#039;re obligated to do this.

They should be treated as embassies, not churches. They should have the same privileges and limits of any embassy. That means we should not let them spring up as if they are mere places of worship. Because Islam is not merely a religion.

Let them have a mosque in each of the major cities and restrict who can enter and so forth. In terms of having sanctuary, there&#039;s no reason we should extend that concept to any group that is known to want to attack our sovereignty. Whether &quot;religion&quot; or not.



What we&#039;re doing now is equal to letting Japanese soldiers immigrate and build Shinto temples while WWII was still raging. Argue that we should not have interned them if you want, but for sure letting them build Shinto temples at the time would have been insanity. I&#039;m sorry but I don&#039;t think anyone would have thought for even a moment that that would be acceptable.


We must be insane because we&#039;re doing that now for a far more dangerous enemy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has religious and political elements. We can&#8217;t say that it&#8217;s not a religion, but we can say that Islam is totalitarian and not limited to individual religious activities. In the USA we protect individual liberties. We should not protect people from engaging in conspiracies to break our laws. There seems to be a lot of people are are deceived.</p>
<p>Considering mosques as equally deserving of sanctity as a &#8220;place of worship&#8221; is the perfect example to show the problems. Sure, people lawfully worship there in a sense. But by Islamic law and custom these are also war rooms. They habitually store arms there and plan conspiracies against sovereigns. They&#8217;re obligated to do this.</p>
<p>They should be treated as embassies, not churches. They should have the same privileges and limits of any embassy. That means we should not let them spring up as if they are mere places of worship. Because Islam is not merely a religion.</p>
<p>Let them have a mosque in each of the major cities and restrict who can enter and so forth. In terms of having sanctuary, there&#8217;s no reason we should extend that concept to any group that is known to want to attack our sovereignty. Whether &#8220;religion&#8221; or not.</p>
<p>What we&#8217;re doing now is equal to letting Japanese soldiers immigrate and build Shinto temples while WWII was still raging. Argue that we should not have interned them if you want, but for sure letting them build Shinto temples at the time would have been insanity. I&#8217;m sorry but I don&#8217;t think anyone would have thought for even a moment that that would be acceptable.</p>
<p>We must be insane because we&#8217;re doing that now for a far more dangerous enemy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5248235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5248235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The 1st amendment protects political speech aside from protecting freedom of conscience. Thus, even advocates of totalitarianism, such as communists were, are protected.&quot;

Their speech is generally protected, but they must still adhere to the law. If there is conflict with other laws, those protections are moot. People seem to think that agitating against the USA and inciting violence or lawbreaking is protected speech if you have a religious conviction.

Maybe you&#039;re aware of the distinctions, but not everyone is. Especially these days.

&quot;Article Six makes the constitution the supreme law of the land. Neither the Pope, the Bible, the United Nations, Justinian code, nor Sharia, can be appealed to as a basis of legal ruling.&quot;

Not directly. Obviously we&#039;re not talking about worry that some jihadi is going to take a case to the supreme court and argue for changes to the constitution. The problem is they&#039;re trying to break our laws, not work within them in good faith. They&#039;re looking for loopholes and political end-runs.

The future must not belong to those who attack US citizens and property because they don&#039;t like our speech laws. Who said that? Nobody recently.

&quot;The future must not belong to those who slander prophet of Islam.&quot; Who said that aside from the usual jihadis?

Was 0&#039;Bama free to say that? Yes. Was it treasonous? Probably, but not according to any strict interpretation of the law. Does it encourage jihadis to look for ways in?

Is the US working with the UN on blasphemy laws? Yes they are.

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/09/25/muslims-blasphemy-law-uk-un-mohammed-youtube_n_1912004.html



What they probably think will work best is to get the UN to vote their way as they have in the past, and then argue that the UN has sovereignty over certain international matters, like international communications.


It&#039;s ridiculous, but it&#039;s still something we must fight early before more people are deceived.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The 1st amendment protects political speech aside from protecting freedom of conscience. Thus, even advocates of totalitarianism, such as communists were, are protected.&#8221;</p>
<p>Their speech is generally protected, but they must still adhere to the law. If there is conflict with other laws, those protections are moot. People seem to think that agitating against the USA and inciting violence or lawbreaking is protected speech if you have a religious conviction.</p>
<p>Maybe you&#8217;re aware of the distinctions, but not everyone is. Especially these days.</p>
<p>&#8220;Article Six makes the constitution the supreme law of the land. Neither the Pope, the Bible, the United Nations, Justinian code, nor Sharia, can be appealed to as a basis of legal ruling.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not directly. Obviously we&#8217;re not talking about worry that some jihadi is going to take a case to the supreme court and argue for changes to the constitution. The problem is they&#8217;re trying to break our laws, not work within them in good faith. They&#8217;re looking for loopholes and political end-runs.</p>
<p>The future must not belong to those who attack US citizens and property because they don&#8217;t like our speech laws. Who said that? Nobody recently.</p>
<p>&#8220;The future must not belong to those who slander prophet of Islam.&#8221; Who said that aside from the usual jihadis?</p>
<p>Was 0&#8242;Bama free to say that? Yes. Was it treasonous? Probably, but not according to any strict interpretation of the law. Does it encourage jihadis to look for ways in?</p>
<p>Is the US working with the UN on blasphemy laws? Yes they are.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/09/25/muslims-blasphemy-law-uk-un-mohammed-youtube_n_1912004.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/09/25/muslims-blasphemy-law-uk-un-mohammed-youtube_n_1912004.html</a></p>
<p>What they probably think will work best is to get the UN to vote their way as they have in the past, and then argue that the UN has sovereignty over certain international matters, like international communications.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s ridiculous, but it&#8217;s still something we must fight early before more people are deceived.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5248233</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 08:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5248233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Antisemitism is virtually non-existent in Europe.&quot;

Ah, you&#039;ve got that Islamic definition of Antisemitism.

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=anti-Semitism

&quot;However, anti-white and anti-European sentiments prevail throughout the Jewish community, most noticeably on this Jew-run website, where Europeans are constantly slandered with terms such as &quot;antisemites&quot; and &quot;Islam-supporters&quot; and even &quot;racists&quot;.&quot;



I&#039;m going to have to ask you for a citation. At least one. Otherwise I&#039;m assuming you just repeat the jihadi lies like so many other Jew-haters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Antisemitism is virtually non-existent in Europe.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, you&#8217;ve got that Islamic definition of Antisemitism.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=anti-Semitism" rel="nofollow">http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=anti-Semitism</a></p>
<p>&#8220;However, anti-white and anti-European sentiments prevail throughout the Jewish community, most noticeably on this Jew-run website, where Europeans are constantly slandered with terms such as &#8220;antisemites&#8221; and &#8220;Islam-supporters&#8221; and even &#8220;racists&#8221;.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to have to ask you for a citation. At least one. Otherwise I&#8217;m assuming you just repeat the jihadi lies like so many other Jew-haters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5248232</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 08:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5248232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Incitement is not always considered protected speech. It would depend on what she said. A lot of losers use lies about the holocaust to incite anger and violence against Jews.


I&#039;m not generally supporting of hate speech laws because we already have established that incitement is not protected. The standards for &quot;hate speech&quot; are too arbitrary and tend to favored the supposed &quot;class victims&quot; as defined by the crypto-communists and their partners.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incitement is not always considered protected speech. It would depend on what she said. A lot of losers use lies about the holocaust to incite anger and violence against Jews.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not generally supporting of hate speech laws because we already have established that incitement is not protected. The standards for &#8220;hate speech&#8221; are too arbitrary and tend to favored the supposed &#8220;class victims&#8221; as defined by the crypto-communists and their partners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5248231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2013 08:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5248231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;In Europe you can also be jailed for denying the Holocaust.&quot;

In theory yes, but it&#039;s BS. In reality Muslims can say anything they want.

Thanks for pointing out that disgusting state of affairs. And the law is unwise. There should be laws against incitement with reliable courts to process. But in reality you can&#039;t get justice in Europe now that the barbarians are gathered. Not till there is a change in leadership.

&quot;If she was as brave as she says she should try saying anything bad about Jews and see how far that&#039;ll get her&quot;



Meaning what? You&#039;re full of bullshirt? Or do you mean that when righteous people get angry at liars, that upsets you as a jihadi? Seeing as how fundamental it is to lie as a jihadi, I understand your objections. Hopefully you also understand mine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In Europe you can also be jailed for denying the Holocaust.&#8221;</p>
<p>In theory yes, but it&#8217;s BS. In reality Muslims can say anything they want.</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing out that disgusting state of affairs. And the law is unwise. There should be laws against incitement with reliable courts to process. But in reality you can&#8217;t get justice in Europe now that the barbarians are gathered. Not till there is a change in leadership.</p>
<p>&#8220;If she was as brave as she says she should try saying anything bad about Jews and see how far that&#8217;ll get her&#8221;</p>
<p>Meaning what? You&#8217;re full of bullshirt? Or do you mean that when righteous people get angry at liars, that upsets you as a jihadi? Seeing as how fundamental it is to lie as a jihadi, I understand your objections. Hopefully you also understand mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doger Trader</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5241714</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doger Trader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 06:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5241714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[please correct me if i am wrong...:

i can see lately many signs that parts of  western society is awakening to the fact that euroarabia scenario is real. there is an influx of web sites that arousing public opinion against the threat of radical islam.

one thing i wonder - if i am not hanging out  too much in sites that reflect my views

-&quot;convince the already  convinced ones&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please correct me if i am wrong&#8230;:</p>
<p>i can see lately many signs that parts of  western society is awakening to the fact that euroarabia scenario is real. there is an influx of web sites that arousing public opinion against the threat of radical islam.</p>
<p>one thing i wonder &#8211; if i am not hanging out  too much in sites that reflect my views</p>
<p>-&#8221;convince the already  convinced ones&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manaphy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5241681</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manaphy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5241681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Antisemitism is virtually non-existent in Europe. Most Europeans have no problem with Judaism. However, anti-white and anti-European sentiments prevail throughout the Jewish community, most noticeably on this Jew-run website, where Europeans are constantly slandered with terms such as &quot;antisemites&quot; and &quot;Islam-supporters&quot; and even &quot;racists&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antisemitism is virtually non-existent in Europe. Most Europeans have no problem with Judaism. However, anti-white and anti-European sentiments prevail throughout the Jewish community, most noticeably on this Jew-run website, where Europeans are constantly slandered with terms such as &#8220;antisemites&#8221; and &#8220;Islam-supporters&#8221; and even &#8220;racists&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manaphy</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5241679</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manaphy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 03:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5241679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hat doesn&#039;t respond to Samuel&#039;s statement. I don&#039;t know if criticizing Europe&#039;s holocaust denial policy would get her anywhere, but if sdid that then I am sure that FrontPageMag wouldn&#039;t have said that she &quot;fought for free speech&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hat doesn&#8217;t respond to Samuel&#8217;s statement. I don&#8217;t know if criticizing Europe&#8217;s holocaust denial policy would get her anywhere, but if sdid that then I am sure that FrontPageMag wouldn&#8217;t have said that she &#8220;fought for free speech&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5241678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 03:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5241678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One by one the voices of truth are beginning to overcome the fear of reprisal by angry Muslims the pathetically impotent, incompetent, and irrational Western governments who host and support them, and to speak out against the 7th Century form of barbarism, theocracy, and thuggery that is rapidly sweeping across Europe and America.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One by one the voices of truth are beginning to overcome the fear of reprisal by angry Muslims the pathetically impotent, incompetent, and irrational Western governments who host and support them, and to speak out against the 7th Century form of barbarism, theocracy, and thuggery that is rapidly sweeping across Europe and America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason P</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5241671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason P]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 03:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5241671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good points, 8ball.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points, 8ball.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FalkoBaumgartner</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5241656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FalkoBaumgartner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 01:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5241656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the Muslim lobbyists were really serious about banning hate speech, they would be obliged to prohibit the Quran which is full of hateful speech against Christians, Jews, &quot;infidels&quot; and women. The first thing when dealing with Islamic lobbyists is to be not intimidated by their bullying tactics. The more they try to appear offended, the more one has hit the nail on the head and the more one should work these points.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Muslim lobbyists were really serious about banning hate speech, they would be obliged to prohibit the Quran which is full of hateful speech against Christians, Jews, &#8220;infidels&#8221; and women. The first thing when dealing with Islamic lobbyists is to be not intimidated by their bullying tactics. The more they try to appear offended, the more one has hit the nail on the head and the more one should work these points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8ball</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5241601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[8ball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2013 23:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5241601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with you but I would argue more prosaically that no set of beliefs - whether it be Christianity, atheism, Islam, paternalism, feminism or, gawd forbid, Anthropogenic Global Warming  - should be beyond intellectual attack and even ridicule.


Muslims want to make it a crime to blaspheme Mohammed, yet Mohammed (and all Muslims) blasphemed Christ by claiming that He was merely a prophet. As a set of beliefs Islam is risible. Mohammed, their perfect man, wasn&#039;t even a good man.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you but I would argue more prosaically that no set of beliefs &#8211; whether it be Christianity, atheism, Islam, paternalism, feminism or, gawd forbid, Anthropogenic Global Warming  &#8211; should be beyond intellectual attack and even ridicule.</p>
<p>Muslims want to make it a crime to blaspheme Mohammed, yet Mohammed (and all Muslims) blasphemed Christ by claiming that He was merely a prophet. As a set of beliefs Islam is risible. Mohammed, their perfect man, wasn&#8217;t even a good man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason P</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5241465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason P]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jul 2013 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5241465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A religion is a philosophy that takes the supernatural as a plank of its metaphysics and faith as a central component of its epistemology. Islam is clearly a religion but its more than that: it is first and foremost a political philosophy. Obviously a 7th century political philosophy and 7th century social thought would be faith-based and supernatural.


The 1st amendment protects political speech aside from protecting freedom of conscience. Thus, even advocates of totalitarianism, such as communists were, are protected. They must be opposed with argument. We must be free to criticize any and all philosophies both secular and religious. This is especially true if the religion is appealed to as a basis of social and political actions. 

Article Six makes the constitution the supreme law of the land. Neither the Pope, the Bible, the United Nations, Justinian code, nor Sharia, can be appealed to as a basis of legal ruling.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A religion is a philosophy that takes the supernatural as a plank of its metaphysics and faith as a central component of its epistemology. Islam is clearly a religion but its more than that: it is first and foremost a political philosophy. Obviously a 7th century political philosophy and 7th century social thought would be faith-based and supernatural.</p>
<p>The 1st amendment protects political speech aside from protecting freedom of conscience. Thus, even advocates of totalitarianism, such as communists were, are protected. They must be opposed with argument. We must be free to criticize any and all philosophies both secular and religious. This is especially true if the religion is appealed to as a basis of social and political actions. </p>
<p>Article Six makes the constitution the supreme law of the land. Neither the Pope, the Bible, the United Nations, Justinian code, nor Sharia, can be appealed to as a basis of legal ruling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deltamike67</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5240945</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deltamike67]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2013 02:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5240945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, anti-Semitism is rife in Europe, especially Sweden. In the UK, they actually denied entry to a student because  he was Jewish!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, anti-Semitism is rife in Europe, especially Sweden. In the UK, they actually denied entry to a student because  he was Jewish!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deltamike67</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5240944</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[deltamike67]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2013 02:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5240944</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if you start from the premise that Islam is a &quot;religion&quot; you lose! For us, it&#039;s a matter of Article 6 of the Constitution, NOT the 1st Amendment and freedom of religion. Will we allow the Muslims to abrogate our Constitution with &quot;hate speech&quot; laws, or maintain our Freedom of Speech?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you start from the premise that Islam is a &#8220;religion&#8221; you lose! For us, it&#8217;s a matter of Article 6 of the Constitution, NOT the 1st Amendment and freedom of religion. Will we allow the Muslims to abrogate our Constitution with &#8220;hate speech&#8221; laws, or maintain our Freedom of Speech?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tanstaafl</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5240940</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tanstaafl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2013 02:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5240940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Try being a Shia Muslim in Saudi Arabia.  Or an Ahmadhi Muslim in Pakistan.  Or, if you are brave, tell a group of your Muslim &quot;friends&quot; that the Prophet was a pedophile.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try being a Shia Muslim in Saudi Arabia.  Or an Ahmadhi Muslim in Pakistan.  Or, if you are brave, tell a group of your Muslim &#8220;friends&#8221; that the Prophet was a pedophile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.L. Winslow</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5240591</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T.L. Winslow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5240591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s almost funny to see once-proud Europe disintegrating under the invasion of the Muslim World, and people who once called themselves the superior master race stuck on nincompoop on such an easy subject with so much easily available educational material on the Internet. But it&#039;s not funny, it&#039;s tragic. I just hope it doesn&#039;t turn into a nightmare with hordes of Allah Akbar-shouting white Euro Muslims attacking the U.S. and Israel one day. Maybe the U.S. is the New Constantinople, and Europe the New Ancient Rome, a geographical mirror image of what happened in the past, played out on the opposite side of the world. At least we have the comfort of knowing that Constantinople held out a thousand years, long enough for Western civilization to find a new home. Next time maybe it will be in space. Let me get started on the novel and I&#039;ll check back with ya later :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s almost funny to see once-proud Europe disintegrating under the invasion of the Muslim World, and people who once called themselves the superior master race stuck on nincompoop on such an easy subject with so much easily available educational material on the Internet. But it&#8217;s not funny, it&#8217;s tragic. I just hope it doesn&#8217;t turn into a nightmare with hordes of Allah Akbar-shouting white Euro Muslims attacking the U.S. and Israel one day. Maybe the U.S. is the New Constantinople, and Europe the New Ancient Rome, a geographical mirror image of what happened in the past, played out on the opposite side of the world. At least we have the comfort of knowing that Constantinople held out a thousand years, long enough for Western civilization to find a new home. Next time maybe it will be in space. Let me get started on the novel and I&#8217;ll check back with ya later <img src="http://cdn.frontpagemag.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bribri</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5240580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bribri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 12:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5240580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is criticising Jews &quot;brave&quot;? Isn&#039;t it rather random and silly, like criticising dentists, or Belgians, etc, UNLESS there&#039;s an epidemic of terrorist Belgian dentists...?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is criticising Jews &#8220;brave&#8221;? Isn&#8217;t it rather random and silly, like criticising dentists, or Belgians, etc, UNLESS there&#8217;s an epidemic of terrorist Belgian dentists&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason P</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5240567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason P]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 11:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5240567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today&#039;s intellectual fads in Europe often become tomorrows reality in America. Let&#039;s support the brave woman in the fight for freedom of speech and conscience. No religion should be exempt from criticism. However, to exempt a political religion from criticism strikes at the root of the process necessary for a functioning democracy: free and open debate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today&#8217;s intellectual fads in Europe often become tomorrows reality in America. Let&#8217;s support the brave woman in the fight for freedom of speech and conscience. No religion should be exempt from criticism. However, to exempt a political religion from criticism strikes at the root of the process necessary for a functioning democracy: free and open debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-harrod/undaunted-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolffs-fight-for-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-5240536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samuel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 08:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=195601#comment-5240536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Europe you can also be jailed for denying the Holocaust. If she was as brave as she says she should try saying anything bad about Jews and see how far that&#039;ll get her]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Europe you can also be jailed for denying the Holocaust. If she was as brave as she says she should try saying anything bad about Jews and see how far that&#8217;ll get her</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 713/734 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 07:05:44 by W3 Total Cache -->