<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Be a Film-Killer, by Lizz Winstead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 10:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: reader</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5133379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 03:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5133379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can&#039;t dumb down everyone, george warren buffet soros. Some people are just born with the IQ over 100, which is higher than your average government teacher&#039;s IQ. It&#039;s not going to be cool to be an imbecile forever.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#039;t dumb down everyone, george warren buffet soros. Some people are just born with the IQ over 100, which is higher than your average government teacher&#039;s IQ. It&#039;s not going to be cool to be an imbecile forever.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5128881</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5128881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I daresay that infantry is still the queen of the battlefield.&quot; 
 
Then you would be wrong.  There is no infantry on earth that can stand up to a C-130 with proper aerial cover and fighter support.  The sheer folly and waste of needlessly throwing the lives of soldiers on the battlefield was first demonstrated in WWI, and with the advent of nuclear weapons, there is no longer any need for it at all. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;I daresay that infantry is still the queen of the battlefield.&quot; </p>
<p>Then you would be wrong.  There is no infantry on earth that can stand up to a C-130 with proper aerial cover and fighter support.  The sheer folly and waste of needlessly throwing the lives of soldiers on the battlefield was first demonstrated in WWI, and with the advent of nuclear weapons, there is no longer any need for it at all. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5121891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global citizen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5121891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Who cares about the Ghassanids or the Garamantes? &quot; 
 
You study historical examples. Just because you study historical examples does not mean that you are refighting the last war. 
 
You slice &amp; dice examples in whatever field and using abstract theory you then reassemble them like you do in statistics, physics and structural science.  you learn all the way. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Who cares about the Ghassanids or the Garamantes? &quot; </p>
<p>You study historical examples. Just because you study historical examples does not mean that you are refighting the last war. </p>
<p>You slice &amp; dice examples in whatever field and using abstract theory you then reassemble them like you do in statistics, physics and structural science.  you learn all the way. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5121866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global citizen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5121866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Says the great general. 
 
you need everything,  cyber-specialist and grunts.  I daresay that infantry is still the queen of the battlefield. 
 
Just because the battle space has been enlarged does not mean that parts of it went away. 
 
Does the term strategic depth mean anything to you.  you can sometimes win without it, but it is damn useful to have. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Says the great general. </p>
<p>you need everything,  cyber-specialist and grunts.  I daresay that infantry is still the queen of the battlefield. </p>
<p>Just because the battle space has been enlarged does not mean that parts of it went away. </p>
<p>Does the term strategic depth mean anything to you.  you can sometimes win without it, but it is damn useful to have. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Questions</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5121803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Questions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5121803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have democratized the public intellect too much.  Perhaps a dash of elitism is just the ticket.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have democratized the public intellect too much.  Perhaps a dash of elitism is just the ticket.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herb Benty</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5121598</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Herb Benty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5121598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Winstead&#039;s logic then the hurricane that hit NY/NJ was only targeting Democrats. The insane godlessness of the mentally and spiritually corrupt &quot;Progressives&quot; ( marxists), is on display for all who will allow themselves to SEE. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Winstead&#039;s logic then the hurricane that hit NY/NJ was only targeting Democrats. The insane godlessness of the mentally and spiritually corrupt &quot;Progressives&quot; ( marxists), is on display for all who will allow themselves to SEE. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5121410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5121410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The wars of the future will be dominated by economic strength and superior technology, and the chessboard theories of the past are no longer relevant.  To continue as a dominant player on the world stage, it will be necessary for America to remain dominant economically and technologically.  Unless we maintain a position of superiority in those two areas, everything else we do will be a waste of time and money.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wars of the future will be dominated by economic strength and superior technology, and the chessboard theories of the past are no longer relevant.  To continue as a dominant player on the world stage, it will be necessary for America to remain dominant economically and technologically.  Unless we maintain a position of superiority in those two areas, everything else we do will be a waste of time and money.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5121363</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global citizen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5121363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot; If Americans want to remain a part of the future ourselves, we are going to have to learn to pick our fights and limit our involvement to those situations where the security of the United States or our key allies is at risk. None of those factors were present in Vietnam. &#039; 
 
The difference between South Korea and South Vietnam? 
 
South Korea has a vibrant economy?  that happened after the war not before. By your standard you could argue that South Korea was not a key ally.  Flush! 
 
The failed containment policy in south east Asia (failed at the behest of Democrats) nonetheless held long enough for Thailand to be saved.  only Laos &amp; Cambodia fell instead of Thailand also.. 
 
South Korea is next to Japan. Japan is a key ally?  What about the Phillipines? 
Is the definition of a key ally solely based on what natural resources they have? their GNP? Past behavior?  how many Phillipinos fought for the U.S. during WW2 and how many are in the Armed forces? What about sea line of communications (SLOC)? 
 
 
Every place is next to some other place.  Give them all up as to far away unless it is Mexico, Cuba or Canada? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot; If Americans want to remain a part of the future ourselves, we are going to have to learn to pick our fights and limit our involvement to those situations where the security of the United States or our key allies is at risk. None of those factors were present in Vietnam. &#039; </p>
<p>The difference between South Korea and South Vietnam? </p>
<p>South Korea has a vibrant economy?  that happened after the war not before. By your standard you could argue that South Korea was not a key ally.  Flush! </p>
<p>The failed containment policy in south east Asia (failed at the behest of Democrats) nonetheless held long enough for Thailand to be saved.  only Laos &amp; Cambodia fell instead of Thailand also.. </p>
<p>South Korea is next to Japan. Japan is a key ally?  What about the Phillipines?<br />
Is the definition of a key ally solely based on what natural resources they have? their GNP? Past behavior?  how many Phillipinos fought for the U.S. during WW2 and how many are in the Armed forces? What about sea line of communications (SLOC)? </p>
<p>Every place is next to some other place.  Give them all up as to far away unless it is Mexico, Cuba or Canada? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5121285</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5121285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wake up, Global Citizen.  You&#039;re living in a dreamworld that has no resemblance to reality.  Who cares about the Ghassanids or the Garamantes?   The Roman model was a failure, and unless you want America to walk the same path to ultimate defeat and destruction, start acting like an American Citizen, and start trying to find ways to reignite the greatest engine of economic prosperity in the history of the world.   
 
Here&#039;s a clue.  The so-called &quot;proxy wars&quot; of Korea and Vietnam were phony wars dreamed up by Harvard intellectuals who conceived the entire world as a chessboard.  They made sense only in the context of Ivy League classroom, and had nothing to do with the real world.  General Douglas MacArthur rightly advised President Kennedy that he couldn&#039;t win in Vietnam even if he had 1 million men on the ground, and before he was assassinated, John Kennedy had already decided to overrule the Harvard theorists and pull our troops out of Vietnam.  Unfortunately, he never got a chance to do that, and the rest is history.  Johnson wasn&#039;t made of quite the same stuff and promptly knuckled under to the insane global interventionists who have dominated our foreign policy and virtually bankrupted our nation with hopeless and unnecessary wars ever since, up to and including our present involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan.   
 
The truth is we couldn&#039;t save everybody from oppression and injustice even if we wanted to, and we will be doing very well if we can save ourselves and our closest allies.  Wasting money on hopeless causes is a fool&#039;s errand, and we&#039;ve already wasted more than enough.  It&#039;s time for a new day in American politics, and I encourage you to abandon the failed policies of the past and formulate new ones that will operate to put America back on top for the future.   
 
On the other hand, if you are more interested in saving others than saving Americans, you are certainly free to defect to your friends the modern-day Ghassanids or Garamantes, and I for one, will be happy to wish you bon voyage and fond adieu. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wake up, Global Citizen.  You&#039;re living in a dreamworld that has no resemblance to reality.  Who cares about the Ghassanids or the Garamantes?   The Roman model was a failure, and unless you want America to walk the same path to ultimate defeat and destruction, start acting like an American Citizen, and start trying to find ways to reignite the greatest engine of economic prosperity in the history of the world.   </p>
<p>Here&#039;s a clue.  The so-called &quot;proxy wars&quot; of Korea and Vietnam were phony wars dreamed up by Harvard intellectuals who conceived the entire world as a chessboard.  They made sense only in the context of Ivy League classroom, and had nothing to do with the real world.  General Douglas MacArthur rightly advised President Kennedy that he couldn&#039;t win in Vietnam even if he had 1 million men on the ground, and before he was assassinated, John Kennedy had already decided to overrule the Harvard theorists and pull our troops out of Vietnam.  Unfortunately, he never got a chance to do that, and the rest is history.  Johnson wasn&#039;t made of quite the same stuff and promptly knuckled under to the insane global interventionists who have dominated our foreign policy and virtually bankrupted our nation with hopeless and unnecessary wars ever since, up to and including our present involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan.   </p>
<p>The truth is we couldn&#039;t save everybody from oppression and injustice even if we wanted to, and we will be doing very well if we can save ourselves and our closest allies.  Wasting money on hopeless causes is a fool&#039;s errand, and we&#039;ve already wasted more than enough.  It&#039;s time for a new day in American politics, and I encourage you to abandon the failed policies of the past and formulate new ones that will operate to put America back on top for the future.   </p>
<p>On the other hand, if you are more interested in saving others than saving Americans, you are certainly free to defect to your friends the modern-day Ghassanids or Garamantes, and I for one, will be happy to wish you bon voyage and fond adieu. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5121058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global citizen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5121058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texas patriot 
 
South Vietnam was about the containment policy 
 
It worked in South Korea.  It did not work in South Vietnam. The difference being that the Democrat party became more pusillanimous over time.  The Democrats were in charge of the purse string for over 40 years. 
 
I destroyed you hyperbolic specific point of 1/2 of the 58,000 deaths, yet you meander on like a Swedish lemming.   
 
If you say we had no intention of winning, I agree if that means we had no intention of invading &amp; occupying North Vietnam.  How can you win when you let the enemy transgress onto your turf and yet vary sparingly  or not at all transgress onto theirs?   
 
Still we wore the Reds out in Korea &amp; we could have done the same in Vietnam. Except the Democrat party has become infected.  Look at the casualties stats for 1964 &amp; 1965.They are very low. And yet the leftist student organization were all geared up and protesting at that time having been funded and encouraged by the Soviet Union.  You can propagandize your enemy without a Tokyo Rose. 
 
216 combat deaths in 1964 is not a back breaker for a superpower.  Having college campus radicals agitate at the behest of the soviet handlers is a back breaker. 
 
 
P.S. Edmund Burke would be so proud of you. 
 
P.S. We suffered 11,000 deaths a year during the Korean War.  We won, because we did not cut And run.  Are you a cut &amp; run type?  Yellah?  We would have concluded the Vietnam War as a win if the college protesting creeps had not bucked up the enemy.  the lost the Tet offensive.  If they had not turned on the television they would have called it quits.  If the college creeps had protested the Korean War like the Vietnam War and had not the Korean War been as close to World War 2,we would have lost it as well. 
 
North Vietnam was a 3rd world country supported by the Superpower called the Soviet Union. Maybe you heard of it.  It was also supported by China.  If you are not willing to fight a proxy directly or indirectly than you do not deserve anything, neither sustenance nor security.  If you cannot engage in proxy wars that have been around since time immemorial, then wow what to say?   
 
If you and your enemy (in this case Soviet Union) both have allies/ proxies or whatever and you will not defend yours than do you deserve allies?  I say you do not.  You have failed. 
 
As Stalin or Lenin once said &quot;quantity has a quality all its own&quot;.  Or as napoleon said victory goes to the side with the largest battalions.   
 
Note that Rome had allies. lots of them If it did not it would not lasted as long as it did.  Perhaps you did not learn this in school.   
 
Roman allies Ghassanids, Garamantes, Iazyges, Marcomanni. Sometimes the allies were not trustworthy and attacked Rome.  In that case Rome punished them. but without them Rome would have not lasted until AD 476. 
 
If you want to throw allies to the wolves go ahead. We&#039;ll take note &amp; take a picture.  Do not go begging for a safe haven.  The craven have no right ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas patriot </p>
<p>South Vietnam was about the containment policy </p>
<p>It worked in South Korea.  It did not work in South Vietnam. The difference being that the Democrat party became more pusillanimous over time.  The Democrats were in charge of the purse string for over 40 years. </p>
<p>I destroyed you hyperbolic specific point of 1/2 of the 58,000 deaths, yet you meander on like a Swedish lemming.   </p>
<p>If you say we had no intention of winning, I agree if that means we had no intention of invading &amp; occupying North Vietnam.  How can you win when you let the enemy transgress onto your turf and yet vary sparingly  or not at all transgress onto theirs?   </p>
<p>Still we wore the Reds out in Korea &amp; we could have done the same in Vietnam. Except the Democrat party has become infected.  Look at the casualties stats for 1964 &amp; 1965.They are very low. And yet the leftist student organization were all geared up and protesting at that time having been funded and encouraged by the Soviet Union.  You can propagandize your enemy without a Tokyo Rose. </p>
<p>216 combat deaths in 1964 is not a back breaker for a superpower.  Having college campus radicals agitate at the behest of the soviet handlers is a back breaker. </p>
<p>P.S. Edmund Burke would be so proud of you. </p>
<p>P.S. We suffered 11,000 deaths a year during the Korean War.  We won, because we did not cut And run.  Are you a cut &amp; run type?  Yellah?  We would have concluded the Vietnam War as a win if the college protesting creeps had not bucked up the enemy.  the lost the Tet offensive.  If they had not turned on the television they would have called it quits.  If the college creeps had protested the Korean War like the Vietnam War and had not the Korean War been as close to World War 2,we would have lost it as well. </p>
<p>North Vietnam was a 3rd world country supported by the Superpower called the Soviet Union. Maybe you heard of it.  It was also supported by China.  If you are not willing to fight a proxy directly or indirectly than you do not deserve anything, neither sustenance nor security.  If you cannot engage in proxy wars that have been around since time immemorial, then wow what to say?   </p>
<p>If you and your enemy (in this case Soviet Union) both have allies/ proxies or whatever and you will not defend yours than do you deserve allies?  I say you do not.  You have failed. </p>
<p>As Stalin or Lenin once said &quot;quantity has a quality all its own&quot;.  Or as napoleon said victory goes to the side with the largest battalions.   </p>
<p>Note that Rome had allies. lots of them If it did not it would not lasted as long as it did.  Perhaps you did not learn this in school.   </p>
<p>Roman allies Ghassanids, Garamantes, Iazyges, Marcomanni. Sometimes the allies were not trustworthy and attacked Rome.  In that case Rome punished them. but without them Rome would have not lasted until AD 476. </p>
<p>If you want to throw allies to the wolves go ahead. We&#039;ll take note &amp; take a picture.  Do not go begging for a safe haven.  The craven have no right </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5120800</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5120800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;US defense contractors aren&#8217;t America&#8217;s enemy and I don&#8217;t see how they could, or why they should, operate at a loss or on meager profits. It&#8217;s not like they put out a substandard product, and it&#8217;s not like they talked the soviets into trying to take over the world, or talked Ho Chi Minh into trying to subjugate South Vietnam.&quot; 
 
No one is a bigger friend of state of the art military technology than I am.  And in order to survive in a world where our economy is no longer the biggest and the strongest, there is no question that we are going to have to do whatever it takes to make sure that our military technology remains second to none.  But not all money spent on defense serves to advance our position relative to our military competitors, and Vietnam was a classic example of wasting American &quot;blood and treasure&quot; for nothing.  Ho Chi Minh wasn&#039;t worth one American life, and as it turns out, the fall of South Vietnam didn&#039;t diminish American security in the world one iota.   What happened in Vietnam has happened all over the world since the beginning of time, and there is nothing anyone can do to stop it.  If Americans want to remain a part of the future ourselves, we are going to have to learn to pick our fights and limit our involvement to those situations where the security of the United States or our key allies is at risk.  None of those factors were present in Vietnam. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;US defense contractors aren&rsquo;t America&rsquo;s enemy and I don&rsquo;t see how they could, or why they should, operate at a loss or on meager profits. It&rsquo;s not like they put out a substandard product, and it&rsquo;s not like they talked the soviets into trying to take over the world, or talked Ho Chi Minh into trying to subjugate South Vietnam.&quot; </p>
<p>No one is a bigger friend of state of the art military technology than I am.  And in order to survive in a world where our economy is no longer the biggest and the strongest, there is no question that we are going to have to do whatever it takes to make sure that our military technology remains second to none.  But not all money spent on defense serves to advance our position relative to our military competitors, and Vietnam was a classic example of wasting American &quot;blood and treasure&quot; for nothing.  Ho Chi Minh wasn&#039;t worth one American life, and as it turns out, the fall of South Vietnam didn&#039;t diminish American security in the world one iota.   What happened in Vietnam has happened all over the world since the beginning of time, and there is nothing anyone can do to stop it.  If Americans want to remain a part of the future ourselves, we are going to have to learn to pick our fights and limit our involvement to those situations where the security of the United States or our key allies is at risk.  None of those factors were present in Vietnam. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rifleman</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5120708</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rifleman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5120708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;... the war was continued for another six years for no reason whatsoever,...&quot;  except to keep 22 million South Vietnamese free of communist rule for another six years, giving another six years of life for about three million of them, and to block soviet expansion. 
 
US defense contractors aren&#8217;t America&#8217;s enemy and I don&#8217;t see how they could, or why they should, operate at a loss or on meager profits.   It&#8217;s not like they put out a substandard product, and it&#8217;s not like they talked the soviets into trying to take over the world, or talked Ho Chi Minh into trying to subjugate South Vietnam. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;&#8230; the war was continued for another six years for no reason whatsoever,&#8230;&quot;  except to keep 22 million South Vietnamese free of communist rule for another six years, giving another six years of life for about three million of them, and to block soviet expansion. </p>
<p>US defense contractors aren&rsquo;t America&rsquo;s enemy and I don&rsquo;t see how they could, or why they should, operate at a loss or on meager profits.   It&rsquo;s not like they put out a substandard product, and it&rsquo;s not like they talked the soviets into trying to take over the world, or talked Ho Chi Minh into trying to subjugate South Vietnam. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5120631</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5120631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the other hand, there are many available political commentators to choose from.  And if you just want the news to make you &quot;feel good&quot;, you will surely be able to find one just for you. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand, there are many available political commentators to choose from.  And if you just want the news to make you &quot;feel good&quot;, you will surely be able to find one just for you. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5120571</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5120571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If growing up means taking off the blinders and dealing with reality as it is, rather than languishing in the cozy confines of your favorite political commentator, I would have the same advice for you.  See below. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If growing up means taking off the blinders and dealing with reality as it is, rather than languishing in the cozy confines of your favorite political commentator, I would have the same advice for you.  See below. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5120454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5120454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;21,257 is much less than 1/2 of 58,000&quot; 
 
And that&#039;s the basis of your argument that Nixon&#039;s failure to keep his campaign promises is not the cause of those deaths?  21,257 deaths don&#039;t matter to you?  You think it was worth it to sacrifice those Americans so it wouldn&#039;t &quot;look&quot; like a defeat? 
 
&quot;One cannot pull out over night 500,000 soldiers without it being called a defeat, a retreat or a route. But I think that is what you would like to see, a defeat.&quot; 
 
It can&#039;t be called a &quot;defeat&quot; because we never had any intention of &quot;winning&quot; it.   It was nothing more or less than a classic blunder, or as Nixon himself said, &quot;a tragic mistake&quot;.  But that was his campaign rhetoric.  His tune quickly changed once he got elected.  Then all he could talk about was &quot;peace with honor&quot;, no matter how many Americans had to die in the process and no matter how unnecessary or hopeless the war was.   There was NOTHING to lose by pulling out of that quagmire immediately and nothing to be gained by staying, unless of course you were a defense contractor with huge profits to be made or a politician on Capitol Hill with huge contributions (from political contractors of course) to be received.    
 
As Barry Goldwater said from the beginning, if we didn&#039;t have a reason to be there, we shouldn&#039;t have been there.  And if we did have a reason to be there, we should win it quickly.  Wake up, Global Citizen.  Norther Vietnam was a Third World Country, and if the United States had even the slightest intention of winning that war, we could have done it in a matter of weeks, or months at the most.   On the other hand, if you think the truth seems like &quot;sulfphur dioxide &amp; methane&quot;, you probably miss the good old days of Tricky Dick.  As Barry Goldwater said, Nixon was the only man he ever knew who could lie out of both sides of his mouth. 
 
Have a nice day. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;21,257 is much less than 1/2 of 58,000&quot; </p>
<p>And that&#039;s the basis of your argument that Nixon&#039;s failure to keep his campaign promises is not the cause of those deaths?  21,257 deaths don&#039;t matter to you?  You think it was worth it to sacrifice those Americans so it wouldn&#039;t &quot;look&quot; like a defeat? </p>
<p>&quot;One cannot pull out over night 500,000 soldiers without it being called a defeat, a retreat or a route. But I think that is what you would like to see, a defeat.&quot; </p>
<p>It can&#039;t be called a &quot;defeat&quot; because we never had any intention of &quot;winning&quot; it.   It was nothing more or less than a classic blunder, or as Nixon himself said, &quot;a tragic mistake&quot;.  But that was his campaign rhetoric.  His tune quickly changed once he got elected.  Then all he could talk about was &quot;peace with honor&quot;, no matter how many Americans had to die in the process and no matter how unnecessary or hopeless the war was.   There was NOTHING to lose by pulling out of that quagmire immediately and nothing to be gained by staying, unless of course you were a defense contractor with huge profits to be made or a politician on Capitol Hill with huge contributions (from political contractors of course) to be received.    </p>
<p>As Barry Goldwater said from the beginning, if we didn&#039;t have a reason to be there, we shouldn&#039;t have been there.  And if we did have a reason to be there, we should win it quickly.  Wake up, Global Citizen.  Norther Vietnam was a Third World Country, and if the United States had even the slightest intention of winning that war, we could have done it in a matter of weeks, or months at the most.   On the other hand, if you think the truth seems like &quot;sulfphur dioxide &amp; methane&quot;, you probably miss the good old days of Tricky Dick.  As Barry Goldwater said, Nixon was the only man he ever knew who could lie out of both sides of his mouth. </p>
<p>Have a nice day. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global citize</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5120291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global citize]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5120291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texas patriot 
 
See below. your bubble is busted sir! 
 
Grow the eff up! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas patriot </p>
<p>See below. your bubble is busted sir! </p>
<p>Grow the eff up! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5120278</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global citizen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5120278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.archives.gov/research/military/vietnam-war/casualty-statistics.html#date&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.archives.gov/research/military/vietnam...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
1969 11,780 
           6,173 
           2,414 
              759 
                68 
 1974          1 
1975         62 (these died as a result of Democrat congress cutting aid to south Vietnam) 
 
 
21,257 is much less than 1/2 of 58,000. 
 
As a reasonable &amp; moral person can see after Nixon took office the deaths of American soldiers fell rather quickly. 
 
One cannot pull out over night 500,000 soldiers without it being called a defeat, a retreat or a route.  But I think that is what you would like to see, a defeat. 
 
Mind you the Chinese had 300,000 soldiers in North Vietnam.  Look it up.  I know this without looking it up.  My spouse had a cousin who entertained (as part of Dance troop) soldiers being sent south. 
 
Person calling themselves &quot;Texas patriot&quot; pull you head out and breathe some air. Quit huffing sulfur dioxide &amp; methane. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <a href="http://www.archives.gov/research/military/vietnam-war/casualty-statistics.html#date" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.archives.gov/research/military/vietnam" rel="nofollow">http://www.archives.gov/research/military/vietnam</a>&#8230; </p>
<p>1969 11,780<br />
           6,173<br />
           2,414<br />
              759<br />
                68<br />
 1974          1<br />
1975         62 (these died as a result of Democrat congress cutting aid to south Vietnam) </p>
<p>21,257 is much less than 1/2 of 58,000. </p>
<p>As a reasonable &amp; moral person can see after Nixon took office the deaths of American soldiers fell rather quickly. </p>
<p>One cannot pull out over night 500,000 soldiers without it being called a defeat, a retreat or a route.  But I think that is what you would like to see, a defeat. </p>
<p>Mind you the Chinese had 300,000 soldiers in North Vietnam.  Look it up.  I know this without looking it up.  My spouse had a cousin who entertained (as part of Dance troop) soldiers being sent south. </p>
<p>Person calling themselves &quot;Texas patriot&quot; pull you head out and breathe some air. Quit huffing sulfur dioxide &amp; methane. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5120183</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Global Citizen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5120183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To the person who falsely calls themselves a Texas patriot, you really area piece of work.  you dissemble so well, are so oblivious and are so indoctrinated you could be a Swedish liberal who calls for more Muslim Mass immigration after last night&#039;s riots in Stockholm. 
 
If Dante was still around he would have to rewrite the 1st part of the Divine Comedy and add a circle to his description of Hell. 
 
DCAS Vietnam Conflict Extract File record counts by INCIDENT OR DEATH DATE (Year) (as of April 29, 2008 ) 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.archives.gov/research/military/vietnam-war/casualty-statistics.html#date&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.archives.gov/research/military/vietnam...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
As President Nixon did not take office until Jan 20th 1969 after the election in November 1968, a logical person (no not you) can very well see that the 29,000 deaths (1/2 of 58,000) did not occur after he was sworn in. 
 
People like you are the reason we lost the Vietnam War and so many people were massacred.  
 
You make the default choice to do nothing. There is blood on your hands. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the person who falsely calls themselves a Texas patriot, you really area piece of work.  you dissemble so well, are so oblivious and are so indoctrinated you could be a Swedish liberal who calls for more Muslim Mass immigration after last night&#039;s riots in Stockholm. </p>
<p>If Dante was still around he would have to rewrite the 1st part of the Divine Comedy and add a circle to his description of Hell. </p>
<p>DCAS Vietnam Conflict Extract File record counts by INCIDENT OR DEATH DATE (Year) (as of April 29, 2008 )<br />
  <a href="http://www.archives.gov/research/military/vietnam-war/casualty-statistics.html#date" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.archives.gov/research/military/vietnam" rel="nofollow">http://www.archives.gov/research/military/vietnam</a>&#8230; </p>
<p>As President Nixon did not take office until Jan 20th 1969 after the election in November 1968, a logical person (no not you) can very well see that the 29,000 deaths (1/2 of 58,000) did not occur after he was sworn in. </p>
<p>People like you are the reason we lost the Vietnam War and so many people were massacred.  </p>
<p>You make the default choice to do nothing. There is blood on your hands. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5119872</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5119872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry to intrude on your &quot;bubble&quot;, but if you have any contrary facts that you would like to assert please do so.  Otherwise, please return to your peaceful slumber.  If what I say, irritates you, try a game show.  Or better yet, try a talk radio program that agrees with your preconceived notions about things.  It will make you feel much better.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to intrude on your &quot;bubble&quot;, but if you have any contrary facts that you would like to assert please do so.  Otherwise, please return to your peaceful slumber.  If what I say, irritates you, try a game show.  Or better yet, try a talk radio program that agrees with your preconceived notions about things.  It will make you feel much better.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hrwolfe</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/andrew-marcus/how-to-be-a-film-killer-by-lizz-winstead-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5119657</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hrwolfe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 15:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=190150#comment-5119657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sir: 
     Your historical knowledge is hysterical to say the least. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir:<br />
     Your historical knowledge is hysterical to say the least. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 757/799 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 05:58:19 by W3 Total Cache -->