<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democrats&#8217; Peculiar Definition of &#8216;Settled Law&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/democrats-peculiar-definition-of-settled-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/democrats-peculiar-definition-of-settled-law/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=democrats-peculiar-definition-of-settled-law</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 05:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: mtnhikerdude</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/democrats-peculiar-definition-of-settled-law/comment-page-1/#comment-5295930</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mtnhikerdude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2013 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207643#comment-5295930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is &quot;Settled&quot; this administration is Detroiting America !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is &#8220;Settled&#8221; this administration is Detroiting America !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smoking Hamster</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/democrats-peculiar-definition-of-settled-law/comment-page-1/#comment-5295662</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smoking Hamster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2013 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207643#comment-5295662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Basically everything except for the bill number originated in the Senate. They started with a totally unrelated bill and struck the entire bill and did healthcare reform by amendment. There are tons of revenue raising parts. I&#039;m not sure if that is unconstitutional but it is definitely outside the original intention of the origination clause.

Here is the source. What the original bill was designed to do.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr3590#summary/houserepublicans]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically everything except for the bill number originated in the Senate. They started with a totally unrelated bill and struck the entire bill and did healthcare reform by amendment. There are tons of revenue raising parts. I&#8217;m not sure if that is unconstitutional but it is definitely outside the original intention of the origination clause.</p>
<p>Here is the source. What the original bill was designed to do.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr3590#summary/houserepublicans" rel="nofollow">https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr3590#summary/houserepublicans</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tagalog</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/democrats-peculiar-definition-of-settled-law/comment-page-1/#comment-5295286</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tagalog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207643#comment-5295286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most &quot;settled&quot; law I can think of is the constellation of laws (including the U.S. Constitution) in many lands that recognize the right of one person to own another person as his slave.  Slavery was a legally recognized phenomenon for millennia all over the world.  So the effort by the federal government of the United States to put an end to it in the United States, ending of course in the mass slaughter of the Civil War, must, by Democrat Party standards, be deemed to be a terrible overturning of the lawfully existing status quo.

Black Americans, take note.  Maybe joining the Republicans is the best thing for you to do for your own preservation as a race of free people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most &#8220;settled&#8221; law I can think of is the constellation of laws (including the U.S. Constitution) in many lands that recognize the right of one person to own another person as his slave.  Slavery was a legally recognized phenomenon for millennia all over the world.  So the effort by the federal government of the United States to put an end to it in the United States, ending of course in the mass slaughter of the Civil War, must, by Democrat Party standards, be deemed to be a terrible overturning of the lawfully existing status quo.</p>
<p>Black Americans, take note.  Maybe joining the Republicans is the best thing for you to do for your own preservation as a race of free people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Well Done</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/democrats-peculiar-definition-of-settled-law/comment-page-1/#comment-5295030</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Well Done]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 02:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207643#comment-5295030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, the word &quot;settled&quot; is being recycled from the &quot;Climate Change Science is Settled&quot; routine, since it has become useless there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the word &#8220;settled&#8221; is being recycled from the &#8220;Climate Change Science is Settled&#8221; routine, since it has become useless there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patriotliz</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/democrats-peculiar-definition-of-settled-law/comment-page-1/#comment-5295010</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patriotliz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 01:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207643#comment-5295010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Obamacare really Constitutional? There are lawsuits pending concerning the violation of the Origination Clause of the Constitution. Obamacare really originated in the Senate and not the House.
http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/26/franks-repealing-obamacare-by-defending-the-consti/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Obamacare really Constitutional? There are lawsuits pending concerning the violation of the Origination Clause of the Constitution. Obamacare really originated in the Senate and not the House.<br />
<a href="http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/26/franks-repealing-obamacare-by-defending-the-consti/" rel="nofollow">http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/26/franks-repealing-obamacare-by-defending-the-consti/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boots</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/democrats-peculiar-definition-of-settled-law/comment-page-1/#comment-5294935</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boots]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207643#comment-5294935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ann is a lawyer and a wonkette and I figure she understands this stuff better than I do.  Were the Republicans damaged?  Maybe in the beltway where they live and breathe this stuff but very few of our employees or friends even cared because they saw no effect from the &quot;shutdown&quot;.  All I know is when there isn&#039;t gridlock they&#039;re usually passing bills costing us more money so I personally love gridlock.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ann is a lawyer and a wonkette and I figure she understands this stuff better than I do.  Were the Republicans damaged?  Maybe in the beltway where they live and breathe this stuff but very few of our employees or friends even cared because they saw no effect from the &#8220;shutdown&#8221;.  All I know is when there isn&#8217;t gridlock they&#8217;re usually passing bills costing us more money so I personally love gridlock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SFLBIB</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/democrats-peculiar-definition-of-settled-law/comment-page-1/#comment-5294906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SFLBIB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207643#comment-5294906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t think there was any such thing a settled law.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t think there was any such thing a settled law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frosty_The_No_Man</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/democrats-peculiar-definition-of-settled-law/comment-page-1/#comment-5294849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frosty_The_No_Man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207643#comment-5294849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t object to Cruz acting within the rules per se but I&#039;m just observing that his using the rules correctly enabled him to have some pretty drastic effects which is kind of ironic especially if Ann is correct about the ACA being passed unconstitutionally which means, somehow, that the rules were bypassed. In Texas and Wisconsin state legislators fled the state when faced with a legislative loss and the Dems mostly thought this was ok.  Maybe the Republicans should&#039;ve stayed out as well except maybe a quorum would&#039;ve been in effect anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t object to Cruz acting within the rules per se but I&#8217;m just observing that his using the rules correctly enabled him to have some pretty drastic effects which is kind of ironic especially if Ann is correct about the ACA being passed unconstitutionally which means, somehow, that the rules were bypassed. In Texas and Wisconsin state legislators fled the state when faced with a legislative loss and the Dems mostly thought this was ok.  Maybe the Republicans should&#8217;ve stayed out as well except maybe a quorum would&#8217;ve been in effect anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boots</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/democrats-peculiar-definition-of-settled-law/comment-page-1/#comment-5294748</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boots]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207643#comment-5294748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I admit what I don&#039;t know... which is a lot and why I requested correction if someone has a better understanding of the events four years ago... but I wasn&#039;t particularly political until 2009.  We moved our business out of California a little over six years ago for tax and regulatory purposes.  I feel your frustration because they don&#039;t make this easy for us.  With the ACA, they changed rules when Scott Brown won the &quot;Kennedy seat&quot; in Massachusetts.  This is where I lose the nuts and bolts of the process but I think the Senate wrote the bill, sent it to the House before the Senate voted on it, the House passed it and reconciled it which can&#039;t be filibustered by the Senate... thus it passed without the 60 votes needed.  Normally a filibuster requires 60 votes to be broken and without a single Republican vote they couldn&#039;t break it.  I can&#039;t remember exactly how they changed the rules.  That said... I read blogs like this for education and sometimes entertainment and since I pretty much do what I want when my wife isn&#039;t looking (just kidding about that) I do these discussions when I pass through the office, during lunch or when I check email in the morning.



And just a BTW... I don&#039;t object to Cruz going to the floor to make a statement for 21 hours.  He&#039;s within his rights by the rules and I&#039;d feel the same if a Democrat did the same about something they feel passionate about.  Kind of like the state legislator Wendy Davis from Texas who did the same thing regarding abortion at the state level.  In any case take good care of that yard.  My turn will come.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit what I don&#8217;t know&#8230; which is a lot and why I requested correction if someone has a better understanding of the events four years ago&#8230; but I wasn&#8217;t particularly political until 2009.  We moved our business out of California a little over six years ago for tax and regulatory purposes.  I feel your frustration because they don&#8217;t make this easy for us.  With the ACA, they changed rules when Scott Brown won the &#8220;Kennedy seat&#8221; in Massachusetts.  This is where I lose the nuts and bolts of the process but I think the Senate wrote the bill, sent it to the House before the Senate voted on it, the House passed it and reconciled it which can&#8217;t be filibustered by the Senate&#8230; thus it passed without the 60 votes needed.  Normally a filibuster requires 60 votes to be broken and without a single Republican vote they couldn&#8217;t break it.  I can&#8217;t remember exactly how they changed the rules.  That said&#8230; I read blogs like this for education and sometimes entertainment and since I pretty much do what I want when my wife isn&#8217;t looking (just kidding about that) I do these discussions when I pass through the office, during lunch or when I check email in the morning.</p>
<p>And just a BTW&#8230; I don&#8217;t object to Cruz going to the floor to make a statement for 21 hours.  He&#8217;s within his rights by the rules and I&#8217;d feel the same if a Democrat did the same about something they feel passionate about.  Kind of like the state legislator Wendy Davis from Texas who did the same thing regarding abortion at the state level.  In any case take good care of that yard.  My turn will come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frosty_The_No_Man</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/democrats-peculiar-definition-of-settled-law/comment-page-1/#comment-5294710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frosty_The_No_Man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207643#comment-5294710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But it always seems as though there are so many rules and procedures which can be brought to bear to try and keep things on the &#039;up and up&#039; or at least try to stir things as a true Democracy should; i.e. take into account a variety of viewpoints.  If Ted Cruz can practically shut the country down using parliamentary rules then why were some rules circumvented to pass the ACA?  However, you may be right.  I only have so much time in the day to figure everything out and I still have yard work to do before the weather turns really bad!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it always seems as though there are so many rules and procedures which can be brought to bear to try and keep things on the &#8216;up and up&#8217; or at least try to stir things as a true Democracy should; i.e. take into account a variety of viewpoints.  If Ted Cruz can practically shut the country down using parliamentary rules then why were some rules circumvented to pass the ACA?  However, you may be right.  I only have so much time in the day to figure everything out and I still have yard work to do before the weather turns really bad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boots</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/democrats-peculiar-definition-of-settled-law/comment-page-1/#comment-5294696</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boots]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207643#comment-5294696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only rational argument I&#039;ve heard is that funding bills are required to originate in the House and the ACA originated in the Senate.  They bypassed reconciliation rules and the House voted on the Senate bill.  At least that&#039;s the basis of the newest court challenge.  I don&#039;t know if it will fly or not.  If someone has more accurate info I&#039;d be interested.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only rational argument I&#8217;ve heard is that funding bills are required to originate in the House and the ACA originated in the Senate.  They bypassed reconciliation rules and the House voted on the Senate bill.  At least that&#8217;s the basis of the newest court challenge.  I don&#8217;t know if it will fly or not.  If someone has more accurate info I&#8217;d be interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frosty_The_No_Man</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/democrats-peculiar-definition-of-settled-law/comment-page-1/#comment-5294663</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frosty_The_No_Man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207643#comment-5294663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Ann may be absolutely right I still want to know in precise, clear terms how the law was passed &#039;unconstitutionally&#039; and I don&#039;t ask this question as an Obama supporter.  However, this claim is made over and over by both commenters (who, in general, have no credibility as far as I am concerned) and people who are actually qualified to provide such an opinion and analysis such as Ann.  BTW, I like her and one of the her books which I read had an absolutely riveting chapter on the French Revolution, but I still would like an answer to my question.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Ann may be absolutely right I still want to know in precise, clear terms how the law was passed &#8216;unconstitutionally&#8217; and I don&#8217;t ask this question as an Obama supporter.  However, this claim is made over and over by both commenters (who, in general, have no credibility as far as I am concerned) and people who are actually qualified to provide such an opinion and analysis such as Ann.  BTW, I like her and one of the her books which I read had an absolutely riveting chapter on the French Revolution, but I still would like an answer to my question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ConcernedCitizen999</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/democrats-peculiar-definition-of-settled-law/comment-page-1/#comment-5294660</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ConcernedCitizen999]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207643#comment-5294660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Settled Law&quot; is just one dishonest trick from a whole bag of dirty tricks beloved of the Left.
In the study of Mechanics, the ratchet is one of the fundamental machines, like the screw and the wheel and the lever and fulcrum.
&quot;Settled Law&quot; is a political ratchet, when Republicans pass laws the Left doesn&#039;t like, those laws are in dispute, when the Left passes laws they want, they become &quot;Settled Law&quot; and can never be changed.

&quot;Selective Enforcement&quot; and &quot;Universal Illegality&quot; are tactics of the Left, just like &quot;Settled Law&quot;.
When the Left passes laws that make everything illegal, or more often, when they pass laws like the tax laws that are so complicated that no one can comprehend them, (universal illegality), then basically everything is illegal and then when the government has the option to pick and choose, (selective enforcement), which rule law or regulation they will be enforcing that day, then they are basically operating as an arbitrary Dictatorship.

&quot;Political Jujitsu&quot;, using the basically Christian charity and sympathy of &quot;traditional America&quot; to gin up support for a tidal wave of poor suffering illegal aliens and oppressed Muslim refugees that the Left is deliberately using to destroy &quot;traditional America&quot; is another favored tactic of the Left, one straight out of Saul Alinsky&#039;s &quot;Rules for Radicals&quot;.

The list is long, but it helps to see a pattern, that the tactics of the Left are not fundamentally based on honesty and sincerity, but on deception and immorality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Settled Law&#8221; is just one dishonest trick from a whole bag of dirty tricks beloved of the Left.<br />
In the study of Mechanics, the ratchet is one of the fundamental machines, like the screw and the wheel and the lever and fulcrum.<br />
&#8220;Settled Law&#8221; is a political ratchet, when Republicans pass laws the Left doesn&#8217;t like, those laws are in dispute, when the Left passes laws they want, they become &#8220;Settled Law&#8221; and can never be changed.</p>
<p>&#8220;Selective Enforcement&#8221; and &#8220;Universal Illegality&#8221; are tactics of the Left, just like &#8220;Settled Law&#8221;.<br />
When the Left passes laws that make everything illegal, or more often, when they pass laws like the tax laws that are so complicated that no one can comprehend them, (universal illegality), then basically everything is illegal and then when the government has the option to pick and choose, (selective enforcement), which rule law or regulation they will be enforcing that day, then they are basically operating as an arbitrary Dictatorship.</p>
<p>&#8220;Political Jujitsu&#8221;, using the basically Christian charity and sympathy of &#8220;traditional America&#8221; to gin up support for a tidal wave of poor suffering illegal aliens and oppressed Muslim refugees that the Left is deliberately using to destroy &#8220;traditional America&#8221; is another favored tactic of the Left, one straight out of Saul Alinsky&#8217;s &#8220;Rules for Radicals&#8221;.</p>
<p>The list is long, but it helps to see a pattern, that the tactics of the Left are not fundamentally based on honesty and sincerity, but on deception and immorality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/democrats-peculiar-definition-of-settled-law/comment-page-1/#comment-5294622</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Les]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207643#comment-5294622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In paragraphs 3, 4 &amp; 5 Coulter just hammers liars with what a bill with bipartisan support really means.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In paragraphs 3, 4 &amp; 5 Coulter just hammers liars with what a bill with bipartisan support really means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 581/596 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 00:39:47 by W3 Total Cache -->