<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White Liberals Rewrite Dems&#8217; Phony Civil Rights History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-5431437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 23:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-5431437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anything this nasty, racist witch writes is par for the course.  She looks at her Adams Apple in the mirror when she gets up, and can&#039;t decide if she wants to pee standing up or sitting down.  Ann, trust me dear, you&#039;re ugly to the bone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything this nasty, racist witch writes is par for the course.  She looks at her Adams Apple in the mirror when she gets up, and can&#8217;t decide if she wants to pee standing up or sitting down.  Ann, trust me dear, you&#8217;re ugly to the bone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-5431433</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2014 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-5431433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frankly, and this is being nice, a conservative claiming to THEY were responsible for civil rights is like a pedophile claiming he is curing childhood cancer.  In 30 years, expect to hear that they were also the party of gay rights.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, and this is being nice, a conservative claiming to THEY were responsible for civil rights is like a pedophile claiming he is curing childhood cancer.  In 30 years, expect to hear that they were also the party of gay rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: medartist01</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-5395680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[medartist01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 10:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-5395680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thoroughly enjoyed your whitewash of US history.  The fact that political parties flipped monikers after the 1964 Civil Rights Act was passed, and the South flipped from Democrat –– to Republican, is completely left out of your &quot;rewriting US history.&quot;

I know that you know history, and that&#039;s what makes you so offensive to the idea of &#039;intellectual honesty.&#039;  It&#039;s akin to saying that today&#039;s Republican Party is the &quot;Party of Lincoln.&quot;  That statement is totally false.  

Today&#039;s GOP senators and Congressmen, from the Southern states, have direct lineage to the Confederacy, and to the moniker the South had then;  Democrat.  In fact, we still see GOP Senators defending the Confederate flag and General Lee on one end... and saying they are the &quot;Party of Lincoln&quot; on the other.  HA.  It was the Confederates that fought against Lincoln, and the party (Democrats of the 1860s, [ie, Confederates] that formed the KK(k) and lynched blacks.).

Please stop sheeting on our history, or trying to re-write it.  That dog won&#039;t hunt.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thoroughly enjoyed your whitewash of US history.  The fact that political parties flipped monikers after the 1964 Civil Rights Act was passed, and the South flipped from Democrat –– to Republican, is completely left out of your &#8220;rewriting US history.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know that you know history, and that&#8217;s what makes you so offensive to the idea of &#8216;intellectual honesty.&#8217;  It&#8217;s akin to saying that today&#8217;s Republican Party is the &#8220;Party of Lincoln.&#8221;  That statement is totally false.  </p>
<p>Today&#8217;s GOP senators and Congressmen, from the Southern states, have direct lineage to the Confederacy, and to the moniker the South had then;  Democrat.  In fact, we still see GOP Senators defending the Confederate flag and General Lee on one end&#8230; and saying they are the &#8220;Party of Lincoln&#8221; on the other.  HA.  It was the Confederates that fought against Lincoln, and the party (Democrats of the 1860s, [ie, Confederates] that formed the KK(k) and lynched blacks.).</p>
<p>Please stop sheeting on our history, or trying to re-write it.  That dog won&#8217;t hunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ P.</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4295007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russ P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-4295007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s more reasonable, Jim, but I still think you&#039;re missing the big picture. First, you say that the Southern Republicans all voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act, but there were very few of them to start with -- far from representative of the Republican Party as a whole. 
 
More importantly, the idea that racist Democrats flocked to the Republican Party just makes no sense. The Republican Party was a CENTURY ahead of the Democrats on Civil Rights, and Eisenhower integrated the military and forced schools to accept black students. Eisenhower also got the first Civil Rights Act passed! Note also the Nixon started Affirmative Action -- hardly the sign of a &quot;racist.&quot; So no, it makes no sense whatsoever that racist southern Democrats would flock to the Republican Party. You need to re-evaluate your ideas. 
 
By the way, all significant parties have racists. But the notion that the Republicans have more than the Democrats is nothing more than a lie that has been repeated ad infinitim.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#039;s more reasonable, Jim, but I still think you&#039;re missing the big picture. First, you say that the Southern Republicans all voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act, but there were very few of them to start with &#8212; far from representative of the Republican Party as a whole. </p>
<p>More importantly, the idea that racist Democrats flocked to the Republican Party just makes no sense. The Republican Party was a CENTURY ahead of the Democrats on Civil Rights, and Eisenhower integrated the military and forced schools to accept black students. Eisenhower also got the first Civil Rights Act passed! Note also the Nixon started Affirmative Action &#8212; hardly the sign of a &quot;racist.&quot; So no, it makes no sense whatsoever that racist southern Democrats would flock to the Republican Party. You need to re-evaluate your ideas. </p>
<p>By the way, all significant parties have racists. But the notion that the Republicans have more than the Democrats is nothing more than a lie that has been repeated ad infinitim.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ P.</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4287050</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russ P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-4287050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And what about the Democrat&#039;s &quot;northern strategy&quot; of getting blacks as dependent on gov&#039;t as possible? Can you think your way out of a wet paper bag? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what about the Democrat&#039;s &quot;northern strategy&quot; of getting blacks as dependent on gov&#039;t as possible? Can you think your way out of a wet paper bag? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim_C</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4282759</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim_C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-4282759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A minus 2 simply for showing the facts! 
 
Typical conservatives. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A minus 2 simply for showing the facts! </p>
<p>Typical conservatives. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim_C</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4282729</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim_C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-4282729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The southern strategy &quot;nonsense&quot; in a matter of historical record. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The southern strategy &quot;nonsense&quot; in a matter of historical record. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim_C</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4282671</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim_C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-4282671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russ, aside from being able to parse through any conservative website&#039;s comments section on issues regarding race and being able to find out and out racism alive and well, I think it is you who may be smoking something.        
        
Certainly we can agree that racism is not confined to geography, but that the South had been the bastion of systematic racism and racial terror and oppression long before and long after the Civil War.        
        
We should also be able to agree that Congressional support for the CRA and VRA splt not along party lines but along clearly geographic lines, with the South in clear opposition REGARDLESS of party (NO Southern Republican voting for it, either).     
    
We can agree that the Democrats upheld white supremacy, with conservative white southerners voting Democrat against their own views on taxation and national security in order to maintain power...I would say up until Truman, when the devil&#039;s bargain started to fracture, finally splitting with LBJ.    
        
We can agree that LBJ was crass and racist, himself--but he also did the right thing.        
        
We can agree that LBJ was right and that while the Democrats gained the loyal African American vote through these acts, they &quot;lost the South.&quot; After all--these are verifiable facts.        
        
Unlike what LBJ knew would happen, you want to believe that Southerners suddenly had an epiphany of morality and began voting en masse for Republicans, ostensibly because these good Christian folks who participated in, encouraged, and accepted systemic racism wanted a party that stood for good Christian people like them.          
        
But what happened to all those racists in the South, Russ? Do you really think they remained Democrats alongside the African Americans? We know certain Northern conservatives like Bill Buckley admitted they were wrong about civil rights. So maybe some of them really did &quot;come to Jesus&quot; out of shame for their historical sins, like Strom and Byrd.      
        
Or maybe--more likely--they did what they always did historically and voted according to how they could maintain white supremacy.  Not the cute, metaphorical power in the fluffy analogy to the &quot;Democratic plantation&quot; conservatives love to use now when they&#039;re pretending to care about black people in order to score a point against a liberal. No, I&#039;m talking about the REAL, actual oppressive power Southern whites historically needed over the people they kidnapped, enslaved, raped and oppressed. Those Southern Democrats were always, demonstrably on issues of taxation and &quot;morality,&quot; conservatives.    
        
Which means conservativism--not party affiliation--is and always has been the seat of racism in America. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ, aside from being able to parse through any conservative website&#039;s comments section on issues regarding race and being able to find out and out racism alive and well, I think it is you who may be smoking something.        </p>
<p>Certainly we can agree that racism is not confined to geography, but that the South had been the bastion of systematic racism and racial terror and oppression long before and long after the Civil War.        </p>
<p>We should also be able to agree that Congressional support for the CRA and VRA splt not along party lines but along clearly geographic lines, with the South in clear opposition REGARDLESS of party (NO Southern Republican voting for it, either).     </p>
<p>We can agree that the Democrats upheld white supremacy, with conservative white southerners voting Democrat against their own views on taxation and national security in order to maintain power&#8230;I would say up until Truman, when the devil&#039;s bargain started to fracture, finally splitting with LBJ.    </p>
<p>We can agree that LBJ was crass and racist, himself&#8211;but he also did the right thing.        </p>
<p>We can agree that LBJ was right and that while the Democrats gained the loyal African American vote through these acts, they &quot;lost the South.&quot; After all&#8211;these are verifiable facts.        </p>
<p>Unlike what LBJ knew would happen, you want to believe that Southerners suddenly had an epiphany of morality and began voting en masse for Republicans, ostensibly because these good Christian folks who participated in, encouraged, and accepted systemic racism wanted a party that stood for good Christian people like them.          </p>
<p>But what happened to all those racists in the South, Russ? Do you really think they remained Democrats alongside the African Americans? We know certain Northern conservatives like Bill Buckley admitted they were wrong about civil rights. So maybe some of them really did &quot;come to Jesus&quot; out of shame for their historical sins, like Strom and Byrd.      </p>
<p>Or maybe&#8211;more likely&#8211;they did what they always did historically and voted according to how they could maintain white supremacy.  Not the cute, metaphorical power in the fluffy analogy to the &quot;Democratic plantation&quot; conservatives love to use now when they&#039;re pretending to care about black people in order to score a point against a liberal. No, I&#039;m talking about the REAL, actual oppressive power Southern whites historically needed over the people they kidnapped, enslaved, raped and oppressed. Those Southern Democrats were always, demonstrably on issues of taxation and &quot;morality,&quot; conservatives.    </p>
<p>Which means conservativism&#8211;not party affiliation&#8211;is and always has been the seat of racism in America. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim_C</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4282618</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim_C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 16:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-4282618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Non sequitur ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Non sequitur </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxie</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4281070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maxie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 05:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-4281070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wasn&#039;t Orval Faubus a Dem? btw: How about an explanation of why Barack Benghazi Obumble rescinded the Charter School program In DC? The DC system has a high AFAm student population; is at the top in terms of money and near the bottom in academic achievement. Maybe the kids were getting too well educated in the charter program and had to be put back under the dregs of the teacher&#039;s unions? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#039;t Orval Faubus a Dem? btw: How about an explanation of why Barack Benghazi Obumble rescinded the Charter School program In DC? The DC system has a high AFAm student population; is at the top in terms of money and near the bottom in academic achievement. Maybe the kids were getting too well educated in the charter program and had to be put back under the dregs of the teacher&#039;s unions? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4280641</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 03:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-4280641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stalinist revisionism at its finest.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stalinist revisionism at its finest.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glennd1</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4280092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glennd1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 22:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-4280092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you think arguing against the left on a factual basis is going to do a thing, you are all kidding yourselves. Try explaining the above to your average progressive, they&#039;ll lose interest and begin chanting &quot;Yes we can&quot; inside of 30 seconds. They really don&#039;t care what those who disagree with them have to say. They figure, &quot;Even if these troglodytes are right about some little fact here or there, they are so wrong overall it just doesn&#039;t matter.&quot; They aren&#039;t even listening to us anymore. 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think arguing against the left on a factual basis is going to do a thing, you are all kidding yourselves. Try explaining the above to your average progressive, they&#039;ll lose interest and begin chanting &quot;Yes we can&quot; inside of 30 seconds. They really don&#039;t care what those who disagree with them have to say. They figure, &quot;Even if these troglodytes are right about some little fact here or there, they are so wrong overall it just doesn&#039;t matter.&quot; They aren&#039;t even listening to us anymore. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ P.</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4279394</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russ P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 17:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-4279394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who was it who said that if you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the &quot;truth&quot;? That is precisely the strategy of liberal Democrats. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who was it who said that if you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the &quot;truth&quot;? That is precisely the strategy of liberal Democrats. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4277208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rebecca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-4277208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The dissembling that is taking place among democrats is breathtaking.  Thank goodness for people like Ann who have made sure that people learn that it was not the Republican party that had some dramatic turn around on civil rights.  It was part and parcel of being a Republican from the party&#039;s inception until today.  But rather it was the Democrats who made the dramatic pivot. And now that that reality has hit them, we get this nonsense of racist &quot;southern strategies&quot; and how the Republicans of yesteryear were actually the Demo&#039;s of today and visa versa.  Balderdash. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dissembling that is taking place among democrats is breathtaking.  Thank goodness for people like Ann who have made sure that people learn that it was not the Republican party that had some dramatic turn around on civil rights.  It was part and parcel of being a Republican from the party&#039;s inception until today.  But rather it was the Democrats who made the dramatic pivot. And now that that reality has hit them, we get this nonsense of racist &quot;southern strategies&quot; and how the Republicans of yesteryear were actually the Demo&#039;s of today and visa versa.  Balderdash. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viet Vet</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4277051</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Viet Vet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-4277051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh yes, absolutely! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, absolutely! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ P.</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4276758</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russ P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-4276758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Considering the black-on-black murder rates in big cities like Chicago, one could make the case that the modern Democratic Party has done more harm to the black community than the KKK ever did. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering the black-on-black murder rates in big cities like Chicago, one could make the case that the modern Democratic Party has done more harm to the black community than the KKK ever did. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ P.</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4275392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russ P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 06:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-4275392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So let me get this straight, Jim C. In the 1960s, the Democrats finally started recognizing the civil rights of blacks, over a CENTURY after the Republicans had been recognizing those rights. The racist southern Democrats were so upset by this that they all turned Republican. So you&#039;re saying that the racist southern Democrats preferred a party that had been in favor of black civil rights for over a century to a party that had just quit lynching blacks. What are you smoking, dude? 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://RussP.us/racism.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://RussP.us/racism.htm&lt;/a&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So let me get this straight, Jim C. In the 1960s, the Democrats finally started recognizing the civil rights of blacks, over a CENTURY after the Republicans had been recognizing those rights. The racist southern Democrats were so upset by this that they all turned Republican. So you&#039;re saying that the racist southern Democrats preferred a party that had been in favor of black civil rights for over a century to a party that had just quit lynching blacks. What are you smoking, dude?<br />
  <a href="http://RussP.us/racism.htm" rel="nofollow">http://RussP.us/racism.htm</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viet Vet</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4275367</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Viet Vet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 06:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-4275367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the heading of this piece alluded to, the left have been feverishly trying to rewrite their sordid race history. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the heading of this piece alluded to, the left have been feverishly trying to rewrite their sordid race history. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ P.</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4275296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russ P.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 05:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-4275296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wait... you&#039;re saying that Republicans aren&#039;t racist? B-B-But... liberals said they are... 100 billion times! So let me get this straight: repeating a lie 100 billion times does NOT make it true? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait&#8230; you&#039;re saying that Republicans aren&#039;t racist? B-B-But&#8230; liberals said they are&#8230; 100 billion times! So let me get this straight: repeating a lie 100 billion times does NOT make it true? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ann-coulter/white-liberals-rewrite-dems-phony-civil-rights-history/comment-page-1/#comment-4275173</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rebecca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 04:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=177611#comment-4275173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have enjoyed all of your comments very much.  You can spin it anyway you want to and it will still be the same.  The Republican party has never in its history been the party of racists.  That distinction has always and will always belong to the Democrats. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have enjoyed all of your comments very much.  You can spin it anyway you want to and it will still be the same.  The Republican party has never in its history been the party of racists.  That distinction has always and will always belong to the Democrats. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 705/742 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 13:50:23 by W3 Total Cache -->