Obama’s Foreign Policy: Theatre of the Absurd


barack-obama-is-too-wary-of-taking-sides-in-the-middle-east“President” Bashar Assad of Syria has responded to President Obama’s demand for WMD disarmament with some demands of his own.  First, he demands that the US drop its threats of use of force. Second, he demands that the US cease “arms deliveries to terrorists,” a euphemism for anyone wishing to overthrow Syria’s murderous warlord. Assad noted that once those demands are satisfied, he would be willing to provide “information” on his chemical weapons arsenal but only one month after becoming a signatory to an anti-chemical weapons convention.

Any analyst with the most basic rudimentary knowledge of Syria and Bashar Assad could have anticipated that Assad would not comply with any request for disarmament. Entertaining that notion demonstrates with utmost clarity how far removed from reality this administration has become. It comes as no surprise, therefore, that the administration’s failed policies have drawn support from none other than  former president  Jimmy Carter, the man who introduced us to hyperinflation, who allowed 52 Americans to languish in a foreign prison for 444 days and whose answer to the energy crisis was to wear a sweater.

The President’s Middle Eastern follies commenced with his 2009 apology tour when he visited those democracy stalwarts of Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Iraq while ignoring America’s one and only true ally in the region, Israel. Then he coddled up to the Mid-East’s petty autocrats (who can forget the image of our president kneeling before King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia?) and assorted Islamists in a misguided effort to forge relationships with nations lacking in basic morality and who have as much in common with us as Adolph Hitler had with Winston Churchill.

The President’s mishandling of the so-called Arab Spring has had devastating regional consequences and has sewn mistrust among allies. Israel watches as America and the EU vacillate between threats of “measured” strikes and diplomatic malaise. Israelis see an administration paralyzed with fear and indecision, a characteristic that has been the hallmark of this administration since taking office five years ago.

There is now no doubt among Israel’s decision makers that it is alone when it comes to the Islamic Republic of Iran, much the same way as it was alone when Egypt blockaded the Straits of Tiran in 1967. No one can doubt that Israel’s formidable military is up to the task. The Israelis bought the world a few years of peace when they destroyed Iraqi and Syrian atom bomb facilities, and Israel’s resolve was further underscored by a series of devastating military strikes against Syria this year.

After years of pursuing a failed foreign policy, one characterized by appeasement to autocrats, the administration has belatedly come to realize that other than Israel, it has no reliable ally in the region. Egypt has been wracked by a surge of violence, Iraq and Afghanistan are unraveling, Jordan’s little king is impotent and is due to be next in line in the Arab Spring’s domino effect and Turkey’s Islamist leaders are mired in conspiracy theories involving Jews and the “interest rate lobby.” Despite this, the Palestinian-obsessed administration still appears to be hell-bent on pressuring Israel to negotiate with Palestinian Holocaust deniers and those who propagate ancient Passover blood libels.

The President’s amateurish foreign policies have become a source of derision and amusement in domestic as well as foreign circles. The Russians have out-maneuvered us. The Chinese are ignoring us. Our enemies are mocking us and our traditional allies have grown to become suspicious of us.

The President’s continued waffling on critical issues involving national security as well as his penchant for alienating bedrock allies will have devastating international repercussions and will only serve to embolden our enemies.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • davarino

    If I were an allie of the US right now, I would be very scepticle of any promises this administration made to me, and I would be very careful in what information I shared with them. What a joke, and this guy was supposed to be mister nice guy and the world would love us. Obviously he never had to deal with bullies when he was a kid.

    • aileen22

      my Aunty Sienna just got a fantastic white Audi A3 by working part-time off of a pc online. view it now

      w­w­w.Y­a­d­7.c­o­m

  • SoCalMike

    Ari nails it.
    Not only is Obama’s foreign policy a sham and a bad joke, we have no genuine foreign policy commentariat.
    The Republicans are debarked and spineless while the media now participate in promoting bad policy and covering up mistakes and bad choices.

    • lori

      my Aunty Mila just got Kia Optima Hybrid only from working off a macbook… important link

      w­w­w.Y­a­d­7.c­o­m

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Of course, Obama’s foreign policy is unhinged, which I fully expected. But to be fair, so was GWB’s foreign policy as well, which I initially didn’t expect. Indeed, they are both leftwing morons. Finally though, after reading this writer’s article, it’s very clear that he is also more than a little unhinged as well.

    Then he coddled up to the Mid-East’s petty autocrats (who can forget the image of our president kneeling before King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia?)

    Oh…you mean this one?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0R6QFwKWFpA

    • Erudite Mavin

      Attempting to divert away from Obama and his disastrous
      administration to what Bush did or did not do is desperation
      on your part.
      Bush was handed Clinton’s ineptness.
      During Bill Clinton, the World Trade Center was bombed in 1993,
      Americans killed, barracks and embassy bombed by terrorist,
      Americans killed, USS Cole bombed 2000 and Americans killed and the
      list goes on. Sudan attempted to turn over bin laden at least 4 times and Clinton not interested.
      in 1998, Clinton giving speeches that Saddam Hussein must go
      along with his WMD.
      Clinton had 8 years to take care of business but was busy with
      his own personal agenda.
      Obama’s disasters have cost 100s of thousands of lives and counting and trillions of dollars and a Middle East and Africa in wars.
      Our allies treated like enemies by Obama and our enemies treated like allies by Obama.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Hey Mr. NotSoErudite Mavin,

        I’m not trying to deflect attention away from your obsession. I’m just pointing out the reality that Obama, along with Bush II, Bush I, and Clinton were all incredibly unhinged and incompetent. Indeed, if we want to learn from our past mistakes, then we must also learn to put partisanship aside, especially when you consider the fact that Bush I and Bush II were both leftwing loons posing as being conservatives. Apparently, you missed that part right Mr. NotSoErudite Mavin.

        Moreover, some of your claptrap is gross over exaggerations intended to appeal to people’s emotions as opposed to their minds. Apparently, that’s the ones that suckered you in moron.

        • Erudite Mavin

          Still hanging on to your 12 years old mentality
          as your response demonstrates.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Mr. NotSoErudite Mavin,

            You must face up to the reality that you give me an opportunity to expose your stupidity almost every time you post.

          • Libsuckbigtime

            No, you prove him right. You are almost there with honesty and a clear mind, then your schizophrenia kicks in.

            Marvin is right, not you.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Dude, not only are you more than just a little unhinged, but you apparently can’t read either, as it’s Mavin not Marvin. Now get loss and layoff the Kool-Aid before your hair falls out.

          • Libsuckbigtime

            I am a female Dude! Former military intelligence. And you know I am wrong how????? You get lost you POS.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            You’re a moonbat and I’m the man in the moon. So what? Moreover, I never said you were wrong????? I said you couldn’t read. Like I said, lay off the Kool-Aid!

        • Libsuckbigtime

          I was agreeing with you until you called his post “claptrap over exaggerations”. There isn’t a single lie or exaggeration in his summary. In fact, as former intelligence officer, I can tell you first hand he is not only right about Clinton, there is so much more Clinton did in ignoring OBL and AQ.

          Fact: Clinton wanted that Nobel Peace Prize so bad, he kept ignoring and/or down playing the nearly decade of attacks from AQ. He didn’t want to have to be dragged into war or wage even small attacks. He was forced into a couple of “bomb lobbing” events that amounted to nothing, but he DID TURN DOWN OBL A FEW TIMES AND THAT IS EASILY PROVED BY JUST DOING A LITTLE READING. THOSE ARTICLES AND BOOKS YOU WILL FIND WERE WRITTEN BEFORE OBAMA, SO IT ISN’T MADE UP BECAUSE WE ARE RACIST LIKE YOU ALL LIKE TO RETORT WITH.

          Answer this….. Did you even hear the name Osama Bin Laden or Al Qaeda before 9/11. THOUGHT NOT!!!! Being in intel, I did and it drove us in the military and intelligence nuts that Clinton ignored them and down played these serious attacks and threats.

          CLINTON WAS DESPISED BY MILITARY AND MOST HONEST INTELLIGENCE PROS WHO WERE NOT IN THE PRESIDENTS POCKET. IT IS ALSO WHY WE LOVED BUSH AS HE WAS A MAN AND FOUGHT BACK. WAS IT ALL GREAT… NO, BUT HE ACTED UNLIKE SLICK WILLY (WHO I VOTED FOR BTW BEFORE I REALIZED WHAT A CRIMINAL HE WAS AND STILL IS ALONG WITH HIS HAG OF A WIFE) THEY ALL SUCK… WE NEED A REAL MAN WITH BALLS NOW… TOO BAD THE ONLY ONE WHO HAS THEM IS FORMER KGB. DAMN IT!

          • ObamaYoMoma

            I was agreeing with you until you called his post “claptrap over exaggerations”. There isn’t a single lie or exaggeration in his summary.

            Really? Well then, what about this one: Obama’s disasters have cost 100s of thousands of lives and counting and trillions of dollars and a Middle East and Africa in wars.

            Uhm…while Obama is a certified moron; he is hardly responsible for the resurrection and reemergence of Islam. Indeed, by all means, please explain how you believe that Obama is responsible for jihads that have resulted in the deaths of 100s of thousands of jihadists in the Middle East and in North Africa, and while you are at it, please also provide an accounting of the “trillions of dollars” blown in the Middle East and Africa as a direct result of Obama as well. Now, of course, GWB blew trillions of dollars in his ill named so-called “War on Terror”, that was so fantasy-based that it was destined to turn into the biggest strategic blunder ever in American history even before it was ever launched, but that’s not what his claptrap was referring to.

            I can tell you first hand he is not only right about Clinton, there is so much more Clinton did

            Oh okay, all right then, now please show me where I disagreed with Clinton’s incompetence you moonbat? I don’t know what you guys are smoking, but whatever it is, please send me some.

            P. S. If I hear one more time about how dumb Bush is I will scream.

            I could care less where that moronic loon graduated! He was and still is one of the biggest and most inept morons to ever serve the office of President, Republican or Democrat. Indeed, his presidency is one of the most disgraceful and incompetent ever in American history. Islam, a so-called “religion of peace”…are you out of your fricking-unhinged mind!

            Dude, you need to ease off on the Kool-Aid as it is making you more than just a little unhinged.

          • ziggy zoggy

            George Bush is a good man. You are full of $hit.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            The road to perdition was paved in good intentions. He was
            and still is a moron!

            Not to mention, you can’t deny anything I’ve said, and I could say a whole lot more. And if you agree with him, then you too are also incredibly misguided.

          • ziggy zoggy

            Bush is not stupid. He is overly fond of the Christian doctrine of forgiveness. That’s why he was soft on Islam.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Like his Dad and also his brother, Bush was/is a stealth leftists. Indeed, it was the Bushes, Karl Rove, and their ilk that hijacked the Republican Party and morphed it into the second coming of the Dhimmicrat Party. Indeed, they are clueless Wilsonian Dhimmicrats.

    • Drakken

      To be fair, Bush was greeted as an equal by King Abullah, while Obummer bowed like a good little abed that he is.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Actually, if you watch the entire video, there are also pictures of Bush bowing down to his Highness too.

        • ziggy zoggy

          I didn’t see any bow.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Oh there is a bow in there too, you just missed it. Moreover, to me smooching and in public is far worse that any bow.

          • Drakken

            There is no bow, and kissing on the cheek is as equals and not subservience. If you had ever been to the ME you would know that.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            There is no bow, and kissing on the cheek is as equals and not subservience. If you had ever been to the ME you would know that.

            Come on man….I don’t see what this infatuation with the bow is. There are plenty of pictures on the Internet of Bush bowing to that same damn Saudi King, but because I don’t share you guy’s infatuation with the bow, I won’t bother to look them up again to post them. Not to mention that smooching in my book, but maybe not in you all’s book is far worse! The point of the post, nevertheless, is to show that the Republicans are almost but not quite as incompetent as the Left and Obama. Heck, both political parties today are really just two sides of the same leftwing coin. Hence, it’s time to take your partisan hats off fellows and accept reality!

            Damn…who would have thought that a bow was so damn important!

          • Libsuckbigtime

            IT’S BOZO’S BIG “THANK YOU” FOR THE HARVARD FUNDING HE GOT TO GO TO HARVARD REQUESTED BY KHALID AL MONSOUR AND PERCY SUTTON.

            LOOK IT UP.

            THE WANTING TO ATTACK ASSAD IS ALSO PAYBACK AS SAUDI’S BACK MB AND NOW AQ REBELS…. WHY??? TO BLOCK THE PLANNED RUSSIAN OIL PIPELINE THAT ASSAD IS CONSIDERING. THIS WILL HURT THE SAUDI’S. ALSO, THEY ARE SUNNI AND ASSAD’S GANG IS SHIITE BACKED.

            THE BLOCKING OF DRILLING, FRACKING, PIPELINE, AND COAL IS ALSO A THANK YOU TO SAUDI’S… IF WE BECOME ENERGY INDEPENDENT SAUDI’S LOSE.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Hey moonbat, just so you know. I never ever read posts typed in all upper case characters. Sorry.

          • Libsuckbigtime

            HEY BUFU:

            GOOD EXCUSE TO NOT HAVE TO ADMIT DEFEAT!!!!!!!!!

            ROFLMFAO

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Did anyone ever point out to you that you are more than just a little unhinged?

          • Libsuckbigtime

            No, but I bet you get it all the time. Quit repeating yourself.

          • Libsuckbigtime

            Like usual…. we are wasting our time on this either OFA employee or a dude with a crush on Obama

          • Libsuckbigtime

            There is no bow…. he is mentally deranged.

    • Libsuckbigtime

      That is a greeting…. not a full blown kneel down and bow like Obama did. I understand though as this is the king of the family and country who got him into Harvard and funds his new Jihad.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        That is a greeting…. not a full blown kneel down and bow like Obama did. I understand though as this is the king of the family and country who got him into Harvard and funds his new Jihad.

        Talk about bend over backwards to let Bush off the hook. Well…at least Obama didn’t smooch with him like Bush. So do you low information Republican voters feel like Bush’s so-called “War on Terror”, even though terrorism is a Western manifestation only, was a success and if you do, please explain how? And did you agree with Bush when he used the fear of terrorist attacks, even though again terrorism isn’t even an Islamic manifestation, as justification to undertake the greatest expansion in the size, scope, and power of the federal government since the FDR administration and why?

        • Libsuckbigtime

          Blow me you animal……. I’d say eat my vag, but you don’t deserve that treat. You may be gay anyway….

          • ObamaYoMoma

            If anything is gay you hard leg, it’s your unhinged responses!

          • Libsuckbigtime

            See above.

          • PalladiumDrive

            Wow, considering what you just said here and what you said before (We don;t have a gun problem…. we have a MANIAC, LUNATIC, MENTALLY DERANGED PROBLEM), one can only hope you don’t own a gun!

          • Libsuckbigtime

            Blow me…

          • PalladiumDrive

            ^ When the conversation gets too intelligent for the morbidly stupid, you get this

          • Drakken

            Then what are you doing here? Leftist and intelligence in the same sentence is an oxymoron.

          • Libsuckbigtime

            I gave in depth posts and all I got was OFA talking points back and insults, so blow me!!!!!

          • Drakken

            That gal has more balls than you do obviously.

  • PalladiumDrive

    I like Obama and most of what he stands for. Still, I think you can support Obama but not support everything he does or every decision he makes. That’s blind faith which is just idiotic. I agree with everything Ari says.

    However, it is very hard to see this article as unbiased in and of itself when there is an ad for the book “Black Skin Privilege” a completely one-sided and racist diatribe. Seriously!!!!

    • Gee

      So what does he stand for? The only things I have seen is that he wants the Federal government to control every aspect of American life and disarm the law-abiding Americans.

      What else does he stand for exactly?

      • PalladiumDrive

        Before engaging further into this conversation with you, I should clarify out of respect to you that I am Canadian and therefore and not as affected (although still affected to an extent) by American domestic policy. So I don’t have the same “skin in the game” as you do.

        Still, to address your comment, I think you over generalize when yo say he wants the Federal government to control every aspect of Amercian life. I think that’s a very knee-jerk republican response that has no merit. Obviously, being a democrat, he’s going to stand for bigger government than many republicans are going to be comfortable with.

        As for gun-control, I can tell you as an outsider looking in, the United States has a serious gun problem. You can be for the right to bear arms but also have a common sense approach to it that does put some restrictions in place. We all have the right to mobility, that doesn’t mean we should just let anyone drive a car at whatever speed they want under any conditions of impairment. If your position on that is “way over there” without seeing the logic behind some restrictions to curtail the mass shootings that happen on average every 2 weeks in America, you are part of the problem.

        • Drakken

          Spoken like a true socialist, sorry us Americans aren’t buying what you useful idiots of the left are selling. Common sense solutions coming from the left/regressives is an oxymoron, we will no longer go quietly into the night while you socialist chip at our God given rights.

          • PalladiumDrive

            I wouldn’t characterize myself as a socialist. At the same time, I wouldn’t say that I don’t have some socialist ideals. Certainly not even close to the degree in which you may think I do however.

            Treating the word socialist as some sort of blasphemy is funny to me. You seem to view it as right up there with fascism. The truth of the matter is, all this economic strife your country faces right now is because of uncontrolled capitalism. A little does of socialism, some governmental regulations on those things which people only looking out for themselves are controlling themselves, is exactly what your country needs. In my humble opinion.

        • Libsuckbigtime

          We don;t have a gun problem…. we have a MANIAC, LUNATIC, MENTALLY DERANGED PROBLEM. Good people with legal guns don’t do this. It is not every two weeks, but it has increased since 2009. Each and every time it is a mentally deranged individual who wants to go out with a bang (usually a lefty or from a lefty family). I blame copy cats and video games.

          Also, the background check process can’t improve without honest medical information being shared. I am all about privacy, but if you are having violent attacks, then your family, doctor, law enforcement needs to know and your name needs to go on a DO NOT PERMIT LIST. They may still steal someone else’s guns though like many have. A lunatic who wants to go out with a bang, will find something to do it… maybe a bomb.

          • PalladiumDrive

            Don’t disagree. Problem is there are those that say a DO NOT PERMIT LIST is unconstitutional.

          • Libsuckbigtime

            I do not know a soul who is against putting people who are dangerous and deranged on a list. I have a problem with trying to put EVERYBODY with a slight mental disorder that isn’t dangerous.. but this dude and almost all of those mass murder types have been shown to be totally bonkers and violent.

        • Gee

          I am a dual national American-Israeli veteran of both armies.

          Republican – no sorry wrong answer.

          I do not generalize. He has violated the First, Second, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, and Tenth Amendments to the US Constitution. He has illegally imposed taxes and regulations as well as started 3 wars without Congressional approval, legally spied on US citizens, used the IRS and EPA as he attack dog. The list is endless.

          The United States’ murder rate is about average with the world. Less than some, more than others. One of the highest is Costa Rica and nobody can have a gun there – over 10 times the US murder rate. So the claim of guns is false. You had better get some more information on mass shootings – over the past 5 years there have been a total of 23. Yet if it was every 2 weeks that number would be over 120. So you are off by merely 500%. The rate of violate crime in the UK is only 5 times higher than the United States.

          Try some fact next time

          • PalladiumDrive

            How’s this for facts:

            Over on Reddit, the Guns Are Cool community has compiled a list of every mass shooting in the United States this year. The moderators of the subreddit, which doesn’t actually appear to be of the belief that guns are cool, use an expanded definition of mass shooting, listing every event in which “four or more people [including the shooter] are shot in a spree.” Under the Reddit definition, a shooting spree that wounds at least four people, but doesn’t kill them, is still a mass shooting.

            Including Monday’s mass shooting, the Reddit list for 2013 is nearing 250 incidents. That’s an average of one mass shooting almost every day.

            So as you can see, I was being conservative.

          • PalladiumDrive

            By the way Gee, this is just a discussion. I have great respect and deep gratitude for your service in both countries.

    • Libsuckbigtime

      Do you get your panties in a wad about the so-called WHITE PRIVILEGE BS running thru lib books, education, politics, etc.??? My family and the families of most white people I know didn’t get that memo I guess as all our families come from extremely poor to blue collar and anyone in our families who have even a dime left over, worked hard and paid for anything they got.

      My kids and family NEVER qualify for any aid for food, shelter, medical, school… but my black friends do. In fact, almost every single one of them not only grew up with aid in every form, but got college degrees and jobs through Affirmative Action programs.

      THIS WHITE PRIVILEGE SHIITE IS BS. ONLY EXTREMELY RICH AND CONNECTED FAMILIES WHO ARE WHITE GET PRIVILEGE. ACTUALLY, ANY FRIEND I HAVE WHO IS A MINORITY WHO CAME FROM A WEALTHY FAMILY ALSO GET THOSE SAME PRIVILEGES THROUGH FAMILY CONNECTIONS, ETC.

      If you are one of those libs or OWS dorks who shout this BS, you guys are nuts… They all call the top 1% filthy rich greedy thugs weather they earned their money or not which is just a sign of extreme jealousy and very very petty and immature. If they spent as much time working as they do sitting around bitching, they may get rich. Who knows.

      What drives me insane about this hypocrisy is that the rest of the 99% are all colors and mainly white. So WTF is all this privilege??? Let’s just realize that there are as many white people as people of color who are at or below the poverty line, especially since The Big Eared One took over. The percentages are that more black and other minorities are poorer, but the only reason is that more white people come from families who do value hard work. It may not be PC, but it is the truth. Nothing holds back blacks except BLACKs and their irresponsible behavior and culture. I am very proud of the black friends I have who did work hard and became middle class or better. Wish it was contagious.

      If your parents don’t raise you right and you are a slacker, your gonna be a loser at life. Same with the losers of all colors who don’t act, including white. However, more aid and education is free for the minorities than white. FACT.

      JUST TELL ME I AM LYING. BTW… I APPRECIATE YOUR BEING REASONABLE AND OPEN MINDED HERE AND NOT JUST FOLLOWING THE CROWD, BUT DENYING THAT BLACKS DO GET PRIVILEGES WE DON’T IS CRAP.

      • PalladiumDrive

        By putting the first black president on the cover, it demeans everything you are saying. This black man apparently only got to power out of some sort of privilege rather than earning it. This doesn’t bother you but ” They all call the top 1% filthy rich greedy thugs weather they earned their money or not…” does bother you.

        Where you and I are different is the BOTH bother me. You make mass generalizations based on race and then you make assumptions based on race. This makes you a racist.

        • Libsuckbigtime

          I am mixed race… but nice try.

        • ziggy zoggy

          Obama is an incompetent queerbait who never earned anything in his life and Blacks Americans are the worst failures and savages that humanity has ever produced. Sorry if it bothers you but I really don’t give a fuck.

        • Omar

          He is a mixed-race president. his father was black and his mother was white. Why do you and other of your ilk only focus on his father, considering the fact that his father wasn’t even American. You and your leftist friends have demonized conservative minorities like Herman Cain as “Uncle Toms” and “race-traitors”. Where’s your apology over that?

        • Drakken

          Ah yes the last refuge of a scoundrel, the race card.

        • Libsuckbigtime

          Obama didn’t earn shiite in his life…. the life long communist, marxist, islamlic ties are where he got support and why….. He went to college as Foreign Student for free by using his Indonesian citizenship while my whole family (and most non minorities) either worked 2 jobs to get thru college, or military GI bill, or they didn’t get to go.

          That IS the reason for the sealing of ALL records. Saudis paid his way to Harvard. ALL THIS IS FACT. I know you will deny it even though at least the Harvard part is actually recorded on video by Percy Sutton who was Malcolm X’s attorney. He was approached by Islamic Radical from Chicago named Khalid al Monsour who is a friend of Frank Marshall Davis a communist who lived in Hawaii and was Bozo’s mentor. Read his book. Khalid and Percy got Saudi funding for Obama and guess why Obama wants to attack Assad in Syria??? Saudi’s back the rebels (AQ & MB). Also the bow to the Saudi King a while back was a big thank you for helping his criminal assssss.

          Why I am wasting my time, I don’t know.

        • ziggy zoggy

          Generalizations are the only way to define an entire group of individuals. It’s stupid to believe otherwise. I’m sure most every group has outstanding members but not all groups are equal. Some outperform others.

    • Omar

      “Black Skin Privilege” is not a racist diatribe. It is a booklet which discusses about the double standards the left has in this country when discussing about race. The term “Black Skin Privilege” is based on the term “White Skin Privilege”, which was used by the Weather Underground terrorist group to try and denounce America as a racist country despite the fact that key civil rights reform was passed in Congress a handful of years before Bill Ayers and others of his ilk came up with the “White Skin Privilege” term. The Freedom Center is simply trying to inform the American people about the true agenda of the left.

      • Libsuckbigtime

        In a liberal’s world, that is racist diatribe as it hurts their agenda of screwwing America’s white folks… and white hispanics… lol

    • MLCBLOG

      I think it’s a racist practice that is really happening. What should we say then? Are we not to talk about it?

  • LindaRivera

    Christians and other innocents in Syria are being savagely attacked by Obama’s U.S. armed and trained Muslim terrorists FSA-Al Qaeda. Please sign!

    ARMENIAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE OF AMERICA
    SAY NO! to U.S. Strikes Against Syria

    Send a Free ANCA Webmail to Your Legislators

    Send a free ANCA WebMail to your Senators and Representative NOW!
    Simply type in your name, address and email below and click “Send
    Message.”

    Then, take a moment to ask all your friends and family to contact their elected officials using the handy “Tell-a-Friend” feature. You can also share this action alert on your Facebook and Twitter pages.
    http://www.anca.org/action_alerts/action_disp.php?aaid=62908811

  • Rubin Valery

    President Obama himself has created a theater of the absurd

  • bob e

    3+ more years of this phony chicago street hustler pimp & then hillary…what’s not ta’ like..

  • USARetired

    The only foreign policy O’Bozo is interested in is the secret preservation and support of his Muslim Brotherhood, with the intent of controlling the entire Middle East. He failed in Egypt, but is determined to succeed in Syria by supporting the terrorists, and anti-Christians, which is entirely the wrong side to support.
    If Washington does not remove this Muslim, illegal immigrant, fraudster, and criminal soon, there will be no recovery!

    • Libsuckbigtime

      Obama is just trying to give a big THANK YOU to the Saudi’s who funded his Harvard education and who knows what else. Saudi’s back MB and now AQ as they don’t want Syria to give Russia the permission to run a pipeline thru Syria to make it easier to ship to the world especially Europe.

      Saudis don’t want this, nor do they want AMerica to become energy independent. THIS IS WHY OBAMA IS BLOCKING ALL ENERGY PROGRESS IN AMERICA INCLUDING ADDITIONAL DRILLING, FRACKING, AND COAL.

      OBAMA’S LIPS ARE SECURELY WRAPPED AROUND THE SAUDI’S *****.

      CAN’T WAIT FOR THE LIV’S TO CHIME IN. OFA EMPLOYEES I MEAN.

  • Drakken

    This country was not founded on socialist principles but rugged American individualism period! The problem with giving govt power is that if you give them an inch, they will take a mile, I do not apologize one bloody bit about keeping my God given rights enshrined in our Constitution and Bill of Rights. The problem with socialist like you are that you don’t mind being a slave to the state while I object to it. It is because of socialist policies that are driving this country into the ground.

  • Jeff Ludwig

    For me, the key word in the article is “waffling.” Plus, the Pres. has an underlying attraction to the Muslim Brotherhood types, mistakenly believing they are “moderates,” but, at the same time, I don’t think he really cares if he is wrong and they turn out to be extremists. Perhaps he does not fully support the Iranians, but at the same time he appears to have a deep aversion to wanting to offend them. When the Iranians were rioting against the regime, he was cautious in his remarks. When Ahkmedenijab spewed forth his venom, the President couldn’t be bothered reprimanding him or ridiculing him. He does not seem to worry much about offending folks in the U.S. but when it comes to the Arab world, he is more careful…too careful. How can you not make remarks that the Iranians find to be offensive? They deserve to be offended. They are an ignorant and superstitious people. They are devious. Their government stands for values belonging to the Middle Ages. They are an existential threat to Israel. They have not contributed anything to the well being of the people of the world in terms of inventiveness or literature or philosophy (just a smattering of Sufi poets). They drive recklessly even going onto the sidewalks of Teheran. They do not clear the wrecks from the sides of their roads. Western books are excluded from their schools so they are becoming dumber everyday. No kissing scenes are permitted in movies shown there — normal human affection is denied. There are gross offenses to womankind. Why doesn’t the President condemn some of the more manifest cultural deficiencies of Iran? Why does he pretend they are merely different but acceptable? If one may be critical of his or her own culture, why may one not be critical of someone else’s culture? Tolerance does not require that one agree with every practice that one does not wish to destroy.
    You might say the President is politically correct to the Nth degree, but this inability to reprimand bad leaders and bad cultural practices shows, I believe, a deep-seated confusion.

    • MLCBLOG

      ,,, Pres. has an underlying attraction to the Muslim Brotherhood types, mistakenly believing they are “moderates,”…No, he does not believe this. He/ they act like they believe it, trying to convince others (us). This has been a ploy by Muslims for centuries. Oh, we are just so peaceful. It’s those other Muslims who are so violent, when their whole religion is based on them subduing every other belief and not by winning their hearts, either.

    • Chuck Stamford

      “You might say the President is politically correct to the Nth degree,
      but this inability to reprimand bad leaders and bad cultural practices
      shows, I believe, a deep-seated confusion.”

      I don’t think you appreciate the depths of Obama’s anti-colonialism. He is not particularly “for” backward countries or their cultures, but rather against those Western countries (yes, including America!) that opened trade with the Middle East, Africa, and India 150 years ago. His guiding “principle” is that these Western countries raped what is now the “Third World” for over a century, and now they need to pay the piper. Obama HAS to include Israel as one of these countries he sees as historically oppressing these “colonial” nations, if only because to him they represent the Western powers that divided up the world after WWI and WWII.

      In short, Obama isn’t a secret advocate of Islam. What he is is a not so secret supporter of the anti-colonialism political movement sweeping through the Third World since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the movement demanding reparations from Europe and America.