<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stealth Anti-Israelism from the British Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 17:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Chezwick</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5280709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chezwick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5280709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, the gentleman in question raised 2 points, not 1.


On the issue of the equipment sent, his take is clearly at odds with the documentation of Dupuy and the AMCM. Was he a foot-soldier or a tank commander? Was he in the &#039;pit&#039; and privy to the macro-picture, or out in the field, oblivious to all except his immediate circumstances? Did he actually see any action? Was he even in the IDF?  I&#039;m sorry, but in the absence of more info, the fact that he was &quot;there&quot; hardly makes him the final authority.


The second question - did the airlift effect the outcome of the war - is more subjective. A case could readily be made that the war was won with weaponry already in the Israeli arsenal. A counter-case could be made that without the airlift, the Israelis would have been forced to be much more judicious in their expenditure of ordinance and equipment and - ultimately - in their strategy and tactics. I would certainly concede that the repulsion of the Syrian tank offensive on the Golan was achieved exclusively on the guile and courage of the Israeli 7th Armored Brigade. 


One further point.....you seem to lay all the blame for Israel being caught unprepared on the shoulders of Golda Meir. Might I remind you that she was only as enlightened as the intelligence she was being fed. And right up until the day before the war, the IDF, the Mossad, Dayan, Dado Elazar, all insisted an attack was unlikely and that the enemy build-up in the Sinai and Golan were defensive in nature.. 


Lt. Col. Shabtai Brill was the one intelligence officer who connected all the dots....but his immediate superior, Col. Yoel Ben Porat, repeatedly rejected his pleas that an attack was imminent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the gentleman in question raised 2 points, not 1.</p>
<p>On the issue of the equipment sent, his take is clearly at odds with the documentation of Dupuy and the AMCM. Was he a foot-soldier or a tank commander? Was he in the &#8216;pit&#8217; and privy to the macro-picture, or out in the field, oblivious to all except his immediate circumstances? Did he actually see any action? Was he even in the IDF?  I&#8217;m sorry, but in the absence of more info, the fact that he was &#8220;there&#8221; hardly makes him the final authority.</p>
<p>The second question &#8211; did the airlift effect the outcome of the war &#8211; is more subjective. A case could readily be made that the war was won with weaponry already in the Israeli arsenal. A counter-case could be made that without the airlift, the Israelis would have been forced to be much more judicious in their expenditure of ordinance and equipment and &#8211; ultimately &#8211; in their strategy and tactics. I would certainly concede that the repulsion of the Syrian tank offensive on the Golan was achieved exclusively on the guile and courage of the Israeli 7th Armored Brigade. </p>
<p>One further point&#8230;..you seem to lay all the blame for Israel being caught unprepared on the shoulders of Golda Meir. Might I remind you that she was only as enlightened as the intelligence she was being fed. And right up until the day before the war, the IDF, the Mossad, Dayan, Dado Elazar, all insisted an attack was unlikely and that the enemy build-up in the Sinai and Golan were defensive in nature.. </p>
<p>Lt. Col. Shabtai Brill was the one intelligence officer who connected all the dots&#8230;.but his immediate superior, Col. Yoel Ben Porat, repeatedly rejected his pleas that an attack was imminent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: defcon 4</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5279654</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[defcon 4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 05:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5279654</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why was Kissinger such an a-hole? Does he admire George Soros?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why was Kissinger such an a-hole? Does he admire George Soros?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: defcon 4</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5279653</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[defcon 4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 05:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5279653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Israel denied Meyer Lansky the right of return, an avid zionist, I hope they extend the same courtesy to Kissinger.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Israel denied Meyer Lansky the right of return, an avid zionist, I hope they extend the same courtesy to Kissinger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tickletik</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5279289</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tickletik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5279289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s at issue isn&#039;t the amount of material delivered.    What&#039;s at issue is whether they could have won that war without it.  


The claims by Sharon, a front line general who won the Southern front was that they did NOT need that equipment to win.  He wasn&#039;t saying it to dismiss the actual value of those supplies, they were obviously valuable and necessary on many levels, and who is to say that war would have been won so fast, or that the enemy would not have brought in more allies had the US not shown it&#039;s commitment to the fight?  What he was saying is simply the truth.  They succeeded without the ammo.  That&#039;s a good thing.  It means you have strong allies.


My pointing out that Col Dupuy was an American military officer was not that he was some &quot;random military officer&quot;, but that he is BIASED in favor of his country he loves.  


Sharon was probably also biased in favor of HIS country which he loved.


Golda Meir, being the despicable incompetent leftist political hack whose arrogance, cowardice, stupidity and bumbling led to a surprise attack, would probably be biased in favor of her reputation.


People are human and a sensible man takes everything outside of mathematics with a grain of salt.


My problem with you isn&#039;t your take on the situation, and it isn&#039;t your sources, the reason I have a real problem with you is how casually you dismiss the writing of a soldier who was there in favor of &quot;experts&quot;.   


I think YOU ARE RIGHT that he was probably wrong to tell us that the materials sent were negligible.  I think he should tell us what he knows and how he knows it, and we can judge for ourselves how seriously to take it.  But I think you dismiss him WAY TOO FAST.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s at issue isn&#8217;t the amount of material delivered.    What&#8217;s at issue is whether they could have won that war without it.  </p>
<p>The claims by Sharon, a front line general who won the Southern front was that they did NOT need that equipment to win.  He wasn&#8217;t saying it to dismiss the actual value of those supplies, they were obviously valuable and necessary on many levels, and who is to say that war would have been won so fast, or that the enemy would not have brought in more allies had the US not shown it&#8217;s commitment to the fight?  What he was saying is simply the truth.  They succeeded without the ammo.  That&#8217;s a good thing.  It means you have strong allies.</p>
<p>My pointing out that Col Dupuy was an American military officer was not that he was some &#8220;random military officer&#8221;, but that he is BIASED in favor of his country he loves.  </p>
<p>Sharon was probably also biased in favor of HIS country which he loved.</p>
<p>Golda Meir, being the despicable incompetent leftist political hack whose arrogance, cowardice, stupidity and bumbling led to a surprise attack, would probably be biased in favor of her reputation.</p>
<p>People are human and a sensible man takes everything outside of mathematics with a grain of salt.</p>
<p>My problem with you isn&#8217;t your take on the situation, and it isn&#8217;t your sources, the reason I have a real problem with you is how casually you dismiss the writing of a soldier who was there in favor of &#8220;experts&#8221;.   </p>
<p>I think YOU ARE RIGHT that he was probably wrong to tell us that the materials sent were negligible.  I think he should tell us what he knows and how he knows it, and we can judge for ourselves how seriously to take it.  But I think you dismiss him WAY TOO FAST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Kelso</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5279197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ken Kelso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5279197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes thats totally true. 
Kissenger held up the resupply and it was Haig who told Nixon to urgently help Israel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes thats totally true.<br />
Kissenger held up the resupply and it was Haig who told Nixon to urgently help Israel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aizino Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5279191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aizino Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5279191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sadat increased in popularity after the war..

But otherwise I do not disagree with your post.  My 1st post to Early bird was sarcastic.

For some reason he believes it is feasible to go thru this life with only allies as clean as the wind driven snow.  There ain&#039;t no such allies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadat increased in popularity after the war..</p>
<p>But otherwise I do not disagree with your post.  My 1st post to Early bird was sarcastic.</p>
<p>For some reason he believes it is feasible to go thru this life with only allies as clean as the wind driven snow.  There ain&#8217;t no such allies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5279158</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5279158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t really speak for him beyond what I have, but I understand his position and I think that I understand that it was stated with a bit of hyperbole.


It makes for interesting research. There was a l lot going on. It was a major event in the cold war with the Soviets, that&#039;s for sure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t really speak for him beyond what I have, but I understand his position and I think that I understand that it was stated with a bit of hyperbole.</p>
<p>It makes for interesting research. There was a l lot going on. It was a major event in the cold war with the Soviets, that&#8217;s for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chezwick</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5279147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chezwick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5279147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know, friend....I think the differences are explicit. Gee insists that &quot;nearly NO equipment was included in the airlift&quot;....Dupuy writes that &quot;56 combat aircraft&quot; were included...and the AMCM specifies that tanks, artillery, helicopters, etc., were included.


The respective positions are irreconcilable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, friend&#8230;.I think the differences are explicit. Gee insists that &#8220;nearly NO equipment was included in the airlift&#8221;&#8230;.Dupuy writes that &#8220;56 combat aircraft&#8221; were included&#8230;and the AMCM specifies that tanks, artillery, helicopters, etc., were included.</p>
<p>The respective positions are irreconcilable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5279138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5279138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GEE...&quot;the airlift provided nearly NO equipment during the war&quot;


Obviously there&#039;s subjectivity involved in how it&#039;s characterized but I&#039;m sure he&#039;s aware of the airlift but trying to point out that is was a supply line management issue for the most part. Which is not trivial, but it&#039;s not the same as having the USA drop stuff directly on the front lines to resupply troops who otherwise are in immediate mortal danger due to lack. Which is not what you said either, but a fuller truth is a reconciliation of both positions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GEE&#8230;&#8221;the airlift provided nearly NO equipment during the war&#8221;</p>
<p>Obviously there&#8217;s subjectivity involved in how it&#8217;s characterized but I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;s aware of the airlift but trying to point out that is was a supply line management issue for the most part. Which is not trivial, but it&#8217;s not the same as having the USA drop stuff directly on the front lines to resupply troops who otherwise are in immediate mortal danger due to lack. Which is not what you said either, but a fuller truth is a reconciliation of both positions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chezwick</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5279132</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chezwick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 09:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5279132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;That&#039;s not what he said. He didn&#039;t actually contradict you.&quot;


On the contrary...He is explicitly supporting Gee&#039;s position, which included this statement...

GEE...&quot;the airlift provided nearly NO equipment during the war&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s not what he said. He didn&#8217;t actually contradict you.&#8221;</p>
<p>On the contrary&#8230;He is explicitly supporting Gee&#8217;s position, which included this statement&#8230;</p>
<p>GEE&#8230;&#8221;the airlift provided nearly NO equipment during the war&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5279109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 07:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5279109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Yes, Yes we should have backed the Soviet client state of Egypt.&quot;


We did, after they were well-humbled. We played that part just right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yes, Yes we should have backed the Soviet client state of Egypt.&#8221;</p>
<p>We did, after they were well-humbled. We played that part just right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5279108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 07:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5279108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Is Kissinger entirely amoral?&quot;


The understatement of our age. 


&#039;Because it seems like he couldn&#039;t care less about Israel?&quot;



Does a chess player care about his pieces on the board?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is Kissinger entirely amoral?&#8221;</p>
<p>The understatement of our age. </p>
<p>&#8216;Because it seems like he couldn&#8217;t care less about Israel?&#8221;</p>
<p>Does a chess player care about his pieces on the board?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5279106</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 06:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5279106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Are you claiming the 56 combat aircraft he claims were delivered were NOT?&quot;

That&#039;s not what he said. He didn&#039;t actually contradict you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Are you claiming the 56 combat aircraft he claims were delivered were NOT?&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what he said. He didn&#8217;t actually contradict you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5279105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 06:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5279105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re both right. The Israelis were smart about replenishment. They were able to use stores already on site once they knew the replenishment shipments were secure.


Most smart leaders don&#039;t risk running on empty before curtailing activities. So yes it was pivotal but no, they didn&#039;t need it &quot;right away,&quot; generally speaking except strategically, but not tactically as far as I know.


Precisely how critical we won&#039;t know because we don&#039;t know what would have happened without the replenishment. Some suppose they would have been forced on a do or die offensive, possibly including nuclear weapons.


Yes pivotal and the right thing to do for the USA. No, not really a secret conspiracy. The US responded to the situation defensively in reaction to many offensive moves on the part of the Soviets and their secular-jihadi allies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re both right. The Israelis were smart about replenishment. They were able to use stores already on site once they knew the replenishment shipments were secure.</p>
<p>Most smart leaders don&#8217;t risk running on empty before curtailing activities. So yes it was pivotal but no, they didn&#8217;t need it &#8220;right away,&#8221; generally speaking except strategically, but not tactically as far as I know.</p>
<p>Precisely how critical we won&#8217;t know because we don&#8217;t know what would have happened without the replenishment. Some suppose they would have been forced on a do or die offensive, possibly including nuclear weapons.</p>
<p>Yes pivotal and the right thing to do for the USA. No, not really a secret conspiracy. The US responded to the situation defensively in reaction to many offensive moves on the part of the Soviets and their secular-jihadi allies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: defcon 4</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5279073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[defcon 4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 04:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5279073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wasn&#039;t it in &#039;73&#039; that when Nixon wanted to re-supply Israel, Kissinger expressed his desire for the Israelis to bleed a little more?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t it in &#8217;73&#8242; that when Nixon wanted to re-supply Israel, Kissinger expressed his desire for the Israelis to bleed a little more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quousque</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5279061</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[quousque]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 03:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5279061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are correct with one caveat. The &#039;beeb&#039; led the charge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct with one caveat. The &#8216;beeb&#8217; led the charge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chezwick</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5279031</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chezwick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2013 23:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5279031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trevor Dupuy is not just &quot;an American military officer&quot;...he is one of the nation&#039;s foremost military historians, an author of dozens of books on military history. Are you claiming the 56 combat aircraft he claims were delivered were NOT?


The &#039;Air Mobility Command Museum&#039; is even more comprehensive in its documentation of the armaments shipped in the historic airlift. Are you claiming that all its information is incorrect?


As for Gee &quot;being there&quot;, I suspect that Golda Meir was ever-so-slightly more up to speed on what was actually transpiring in those critical days then he.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trevor Dupuy is not just &#8220;an American military officer&#8221;&#8230;he is one of the nation&#8217;s foremost military historians, an author of dozens of books on military history. Are you claiming the 56 combat aircraft he claims were delivered were NOT?</p>
<p>The &#8216;Air Mobility Command Museum&#8217; is even more comprehensive in its documentation of the armaments shipped in the historic airlift. Are you claiming that all its information is incorrect?</p>
<p>As for Gee &#8220;being there&#8221;, I suspect that Golda Meir was ever-so-slightly more up to speed on what was actually transpiring in those critical days then he.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tickletik</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5278905</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tickletik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2013 05:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5278905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ariel Sharon in his memoir &quot;warrior&quot; backs up the claim Gee made.

And you are arguing with his personal experience by quoting, in order:

1. An American military officer

2. A politician from Israel whose bungling led to the war in the first place

3. An Americanhistorian with a reputation for slanting events.

Just sayin.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ariel Sharon in his memoir &#8220;warrior&#8221; backs up the claim Gee made.</p>
<p>And you are arguing with his personal experience by quoting, in order:</p>
<p>1. An American military officer</p>
<p>2. A politician from Israel whose bungling led to the war in the first place</p>
<p>3. An Americanhistorian with a reputation for slanting events.</p>
<p>Just sayin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elpi Nini</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5278901</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elpi Nini]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2013 04:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5278901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Lieberman,
Thank you for a nice article.
I would like to correct you on the matter off the reputation of Mr. Benny Morris, as an historian.
He is included in a bunch of  historians called &quot;the new historians&quot; which are knwon to be fabricate the Israeli History. I would like to efr you to a book by a real reputable historian by the name of Efraim Karsh, Fabricating Israeli History, The &quot;New Historian&quot;.
Israel will not have a second chance if she falls. In my humble opinion Chomsky,Fisk and Morrs are traitors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Lieberman,<br />
Thank you for a nice article.<br />
I would like to correct you on the matter off the reputation of Mr. Benny Morris, as an historian.<br />
He is included in a bunch of  historians called &#8220;the new historians&#8221; which are knwon to be fabricate the Israeli History. I would like to efr you to a book by a real reputable historian by the name of Efraim Karsh, Fabricating Israeli History, The &#8220;New Historian&#8221;.<br />
Israel will not have a second chance if she falls. In my humble opinion Chomsky,Fisk and Morrs are traitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: defcon 4</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ari-lieberman/stealth-anti-israelism-from-the-british-media/comment-page-1/#comment-5278883</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[defcon 4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2013 03:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=204764#comment-5278883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your description would apply to most all of the MSM (whether print, radio or television) in the USA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your description would apply to most all of the MSM (whether print, radio or television) in the USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 750/797 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 12:44:23 by W3 Total Cache -->