Islam’s War of Annihilation Against Hindus

mumbai_india_01071A thought-provoking essay written by Narain Kataria, president of the Indian American Intellectuals Forum, sounds a familiar alarm. “Hinduism Faces Eclipse” reveals that “the anti-Hindu forces within and without India are working in tandem on an insidious mission to destroy our civilization and culture, and obliterate Hinduism from the Indian soil.” Kataria further contends that Indians are not facing terrorism, but worldwide jihad, which he calls a “fully globalized franchise…working overtime to destroy all non-Muslim nations.”

Muslims currently comprise 20 percent of India’s 1.2 billion population, the rest of which is overwhelmingly Hindu. But as Narain points out, Indian Muslims have engaged in a series of attacks on Hindu citizens, temples, religious festivals and unarmed pilgrims. He reminds us that a month after the 9/11 attacks in the United States, a proclamation was issued on Al Jazeera television promising that “Hindu India” would also be targeted for jihad. Two months after that, a suicide squad assaulted India’s Parliament House in New Delhi on December 13, 2001, killing 9 and wounding 18.

Since then thousands of terror attacks have besieged India. The city of Mumbai alone has been terrorized on four separate occasions. On March 12, 1993, 13 separate explosions in various parts of the city killed 257 and wounded more than 700. Most of the terrorists involved received arms and training in Pakistan, and Indian authorities contend the Pakistani intelligence agency, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), was actively involved as well. On July 11, 2006, a series of pressure-cooker bombs exploded on commuter trains, killing 209 and wounding over 700. Once again, the ISI was involved, along with the Pakistani Islamist militant group Lashkar-e-Toiba, and the Students’ Islamic Movement of India, according to Mumbai police. On November 26, 2008, another wave of terror attacks perpetrated by Muslims targeted two luxury hotels, a Jewish center, a tourist restaurant and a crowded train station. Another 166 people were killed and more than 300 were wounded. And on July 13, 2011 three separate bomb blasts killed 26 and injured 130.

As recently as July 2012, riots in the state of Assam initiated by Muslim infiltrators from Bangladesh resulted in at least 74 deaths. Several Hindu women were raped and then chopped into pieces during the attacks.

Kataria blames these and other atrocities on “India’s decadent culture of political correctness and pock-marked ‘taqaiyah’ of ‘paid news,’ when no national leader dare muster the courage to speak truth.” The New York Times echoed that assertion when they covered India’s 2008 election campaign, noting that the nation’s fight against terror is “complicated by a political landscape in which parties vie for Hindu and Muslim voters’ loyalty.” Kataria told FrontPage that the Indian government “doesn’t understand Sharia,” and that the “politicians are afraid of Muslims” because they have organized highly effective political blocs, capable of removing anyone who would even suggest India is under Islamic siege.

The blocs’ ultimate purpose? “Muslims want to finish India as soon as possible,” contends Kataria.

Incrementalism is one of the key strategies employed by the Islamists. Thus it is no surprise Sharia courts have been successfully established in various parts of the country, including Hyderabad, Patna and Malegaon. As recently as two weeks ago, a Sharia court was set up in terror-scarred Mumbai by the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB). Sounding familiar rhetoric, AIMPLB secretary Maulana Wali Rahmani contended that Sharia courts do not complete with India’s civil courts. “On the contrary, Shariah courts will lower the burden of the civil courts where thousands of cases are pending and the judges are overworked,” he said.

Incrementalism is further explained by Times of India senior journalist Ramesh Khazanchi, who cites a series of events, including the banning of “Vishwaroopam,” a film critical of Islam, in Tamil Nadu theaters; the blacklisting of author Salman Rushdie at various literary festivals; and the war-mongering of the Owaisi brothers, leaders of  the Muslim group Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (MIM), who have threatened Hindus with annihilation, as more evidence that the “aggressive Indian Muslim has thus been emboldened by the state.”

Kataria notes that Hindus have ignored previous warning signs of such aggression, citing a 1986 court case involving the arrest and prosecution of two Hindus, who published and circulated a poster containing 24 Quranic “ayats” under the heading, “Why Riots Take Place in the Country.” The 24 ayats commanded Muslims to fight against the followers of other religions. The prosecutors submitted that they were distorted versions of what was said in the Quran. Yet the judge ruled in favor of the two men, noting that the ayats were accurate. Kataria explained that neither the Muslim community nor the Delhi government ever filed an appeal against the ruling. “It is high time that the partisan members of the NAC (National Advisory Council) read the aforesaid historical judgment and the relevant ayats of the Quran to understand the growing cult of communal violence, even after partition of the country,” Kataria contends.

The partition to which Kataria refers is the division of India in 1947 into Pakistan and India, after the nation gained independence from Britain. The division was along sectarian lines and, as the official break-up grew closer, a religious civil war ensued. The “Great Calcutta Killing,” during which 5,000-10,000 people were killed and some 15,000 wounded, was precipitated by the Muslim League, which sponsored a “Direct Action” program containing 23 points promoting jihad against Hindus.

In 2011, Kataria addressed that part of his nation’s history. “India was partitioned in 1947 on the basis of two-nation theory as propounded by the Muslim League Party,” he explained. “Pakistan was immediately declared as an Islamic state. The corollary of that action was that India should have been declared a Hindu state. But that did not happen. It was a monumental blunder committed by India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and his Congress Party.” He then explained why such a solution was necessary. “Secularism, as practiced in India, has become synonymous with the Hindu-bashing, while Hinduism has become a dirty word in the lexicon of country’s ‘secular’ fundamentalists.”

Speaking with FrontPage, Kataria reveals that his feelings about Islam remain unchanged. He spoke of being born in Pakistan, “where I was threatened with death if I did not leave.” He claims he has seen “Muslims rape and kill with my own eyes,” even as he “watches Islam capturing countries one by one.” Although he has made America his home for the last 45 years, he remains highly concerned about his country, which he fears is heading towards a religious-based civil war. In his essay, he explains that such a war is “likely to be powered by the twin factors of fast growing jihadi attacks and galloping increase in the proportion of the Muslim population.” Regarding the latter reality, he believes that the combined Muslim population of the Indian sub-continent will be greater than that of Hindus within the next thirty to forty years.

Kataria is highly critical of those in positions of power. “Unfortunately despite centuries-old violent encounters with jihadi Islam neither the Indian government, nor the comatose Hindu leadership, have learnt any strategic lesson,” he writes. “Time has come for Hindu leaders and masses to remember Arnold Toynbee’s famous quote: ‘Civilizations die from suicide, not murder.’ Time has come to face the jihad courageously and stop sleep walking towards [the] suicide cliff.”

Kataria worries that the United States is walking towards the same cliff, for the same politically correct reasons. “I do not want the US to be destroyed by Islam,” he told FrontPage. When asked if so-called moderate Muslims were equally worrisome, he scoffed at the notion. “There is no such thing as a moderate Muslim,” he contended. “That means you don’t follow the Koran.” He believes all true Muslims are “soldiers,” and that the Koran “teaches violence.”

There is no question that Kataria’s views conflict with the prevailing ethos promoted by the Obama administration. One is left to wonder how long Americans will countenance Obama and company’s polar opposite approach, one that consists of such realities as labeling the slaughter of American GIs by Nidal Hasan at Fort Hood as “workplace violence,” the grim determination to keep the word “Islamic” from being attached to the terror perpetrated at the Boston Marathon, or the scrubbing of law-enforcement training manuals of language that accurately depicts the threat we face from global jihadism.

Those who might find some of Kataria’s views offensive might consider how they would feel if terrorist attacks were being perpetrated in America at the same rate they are being perpetrated in India. Kataria worries that someday America will also be subjected to semi-regular terrorist attacks perpetrated by an increasing population of home-grown Islamic terrorists. We ignore his warnings at our own peril.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • swamijyoti

    Conversion Mafia, Jihadi terrorists, Italian Mafia and dynasty, and phony secular Hindus in India….

    From: Gulati
    Date: Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:03 PM

    Slavery was officially abolished from the world. It still exists in different forms and different disguises every where. One such form is highlighted herebelow.

    Can the Hindu Masters, who preach unthinkingly and unaware of the political reality, go to any Mohammedan country, any where in the world, and state: “Hinduism is eternal and it will survive” and “It has survived”.

    Of course the majority of India are still Hindus. But can we, Hindus, at least go without any let or hindrance to Kashmir, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Missoram and Kerala, the land of Snakaracharya?

    Abstract ideas can still float in air. But we have to live in dignity, freedom, and should be able to practice our Dharma, promote our culture and protect our women and children.

    We lost Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Kashmir, Nagaland and northern Kerala (Malappuram).

    Conversion Mafia is very active in Ranchi, Kanyakumari, Rameswarm, Mehalaya, Missoram, and Assam.

    Jihadi terrorists and Maoists are speeding their mayhem at will.

    Italian Mafia and the dynasty are seeking phony secular Hindus and turning them into human zombies and slaves. They work for long hours as slaves to keep the dynasty rule. Our foreign ministers are Muslims, defense Minister is a Catholic, and India a Hindu country is ruled by Mohammedans and Christians. Unless Hindus wake up, come out and participate in politics and democracy such whimsical and wanton and meaningless utterance will continue in India and India will continue to be under the slave masters.

  • arishsahani

    No one understand the game plan of saudis .They use local uneducated and poor converts to destroy a nation with in.USA in next few years will face like INdia faced.

  • Rodrigo

    As an Indian Christian, I’m not exactly sympathetic to the Hindus who persecute Christians in India over allegations of ‘forced’ conversion.

    I recommend everyone do more research before painting Hindus as victims. Very often, they are the aggressors. Please research anti-minority violence in India.

    Why do the Hindus have a problem with every minority ? They’ve killed and engineered genocides against Christians, Muslims and Sikhs. Please educate yourselves. Hindus aren’t as peaceful as they’re making themselves out to be.

    • OfficialPro

      Oh I have no illusions about Hindu aggression, but when it comes to Muslims, I can’t really blame them. Perhaps they learned the aggression from the Islamic Oppressors.

    • Nationalist

      who needs your sympathy…India without Hinduism is like a skeleton stripped of its flesh skin and blood. just because Indira Gandhi inserted the word secular during the emergency does not change this fact. So learn to live with it…
      in lieu of your recommendations i too recommend you do more research on the cheap conversion activities of your brethren..and as far as aggression is concerned the colonialist christains destroyers of whole civilizations have no right to point fingers at the about the geat bengal famine which drove people to cannibalism and numerous others man made famines created by your christian brothers in india and the number of people killed in them…and to think these peace time deaths were just a small fraction of the people Christians killed world wide…

  • Messiyamar

    As a Hindu, I know how you Christians operate with reference to your evangelical activities and proseltyzing. Heard of the Goa Inquisition? The Hindus are now in the re-active mode. “Forced” conversions by way of deception, voluptuous Christian women offering themselves as bait and evangelists offering bribes and gifts will not carry much currency in this day and age. The proverbial docile Hindu will soon be a thing of the past – you will feel the full force of his backlash if you persist with your mission of trying to bring more Hindus, Buddhists and Sikhs into your fold.

    Respect others and you too will be respected….provoke someone, then be prepared to be taken to task!

  • ansh

    Religion always divide:

    Na mei moman vich masetan Neither I am a believer (who stays) in a mosque
    Na main vich kufar dian reetan Nor do I indulge in actions of disbelief
    Na main pakan vich paleetan Nor am I the pure one amongst the impure

    Na main andar bed kitaban Neither I exist in books of Vedh
    Na main rehnda phaang sharaban Nor do I stay drunk
    Na main rehnda mast kharaban Nor do I remain stoned, rotting

    Na main shadi na ghamnaki Neither I am happy nor sad
    Na mei vich paletan pakeen Nor am I in the (argument of) Purity and Impurity
    Na main aaabi na main khaki Neither I am (made) of water nor of earth

    Na main aatish na main paun Nor am I fire nor air
    Bulla ki jana main kaun Bulla, who knows who I am?
    Bulla ki jana main kaun Bulla, who knows who I am?
    Bulla ki jana main kaun Bulla, who knows who I am?
    Bulla ki jana main kaun Bulla, who knows who I am?

    Na main arabi na lahori Neither I am Arabic nor Lahori
    Na main hindi shehar Nagaori Nor am I (resident of) the Indian City Nagaori
    Na hindu na turk pashauri Nor Hindu nor Turk Peshaweri

    Na main bhet mazhab de paya Neither I found the secret of religion
    Na main aadam hawwa jaya Nor did understand Adam and Eve
    Na koi apna naam dharaya Nor did I create a name for myself

    Avval aakhar aap nu jana From beginning to end, I tried to understand myself
    Na koi dooja hor pacchana I did not come to know of anyone else
    Mai ton na koi hor syana I am not just another wise one

    Bulle shah kharha hai kaun Bulla Shah, who is this standing?
    Bulla ki jaana main kaun Bulla, who knows who I am?
    Bulla ki jaana main kaun Bulla, who knows who I am?
    Bulla ki jaana main kaun Bulla, who knows who I am?
    Bulla ki jaana main kaun Bulla, who knows who I am?

    Na main moosa na pharon Neither I am Moses nor Pharoah
    Na main jagan na vich saun Neither I am awake nor asleep
    Na main aatish na main paun Neither I am fire nor Air
    Na main rahnda vich Nadaun Nor do I live among fools
    Na main baitthan na vich bhaun Neither I am sitting nor am I in a tornado

    Bulle shah kharha hai kaun Bulla Shah, who is this standing?
    Bulla ki jana main kaun Bulla, who knows who I am?
    Bulla ki jana main kaun Bulla, who knows who I am?
    Bulla ki jana main kaun Bulla, who knows who I am?
    Bulla ki jana main kaun Bulla, who knows who I am?

  • Lord Vikrant

    You have to shed blood to establish “Dharma” even if that blood is of your own brothers. Lord Krishna said this to Yudhistir immediately after Draupadi Vastra haran. Dushasana instructed by Duryodhana carried out this shamelful act. Tough they claim they won Draupadi legally but her vastraharan led to Mahabharat. Now whether mahabharat is real or mythology is debatable but what we can learn from it is certainly not debatable.

    In modern era Draupadi represents “Hindu or Arya Dharma” which is disrobed everyday by “Secularism” (Dushasana) supported by “Constitution” ( Duryodhana).

    1947,Britishers left India,Hindus never got their independence,Hindus will get Independence only if they wipe out secularism from India.

    Now is the time to react and Hindus dont have to do much,just vote for Modi and give him confidence that entire Hindu population is behind him.

    I dont understand why Hindus vote for seculars even after knowing how Hindus are treated in Muslim dominated countries like Pakistan,Bangladesh,Malaysia,Indonesia and even in our country in states of Kashmir,Kerela,West Bengal,Assam,Hyderabad.

    We dont even have to shed blood of our brothers,we just have to ensure a Hindu Nationalist becomes PM. If Modi becomes PM then surely most issues related to Hindu security can be addressed.

    But to ensure complete Hindu rule,I am afraid even Modi lacks guts.