More Benghazi Whistleblowers Ready to Step Forward

benAccording to two former diplomats who spoke with PJ Media’s Roger Simon, more Benghazi whistleblowers will emerge and blow a giant hole in the Obama administration’s already shaky narrative regarding the deaths of four Americans. Their revelations will focus on two subjects: the real purpose of Ambassador Christopher Steven’s mission in Libya, and the pressure put on former AFRICOM commander Gen. Carter Ham to stand down from any attempt to rescue those under attack. What emerges could be devastating for both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

The whistleblowers are reportedly colleagues of the former diplomats. They have yet to come forward because they are in the process of obtaining lawyers, necessitated by their work in areas that are not completely covered by the Whistleblower Protection Act. Furthermore, Simon notes that, as of now, what the diplomats are saying is considered hearsay, “but the two diplomats sounded quite credible. One of them was in a position of responsibility in a dangerous area of Iraq in 2004,” he writes.

What the diplomats say the whistleblowers will reveal is that Christopher Stevens was in Benghazi to buy back Stinger missiles from al Qaeda, issued to them by the U.S. State Department. Selling such missiles to anyone is usually a function of the CIA, but they reportedly were against the idea of selling such advanced technology to elements of the “rebel movement” attempting to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi. Stinger missiles can endanger civilian aircraft. According to the diplomats, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton chose to move forward because she wanted “to overthrow Gaddafi on the cheap.”

When the “rebels” who were sold the missiles turned out to be al Qaeda, Stevens was tasked with the job of cleaning up the fiasco. One of the diplomats noted that it was likely the same elements of the terrorist group to whom the missiles were sold ended up attacking the consulate in Bengahzi, killing Stevens, State Department employee Sean Smith, and former Navy SEALs Glen A. Doherty and Tyrone S. Woods.

The unnamed diplomat was even more contemptuous of the Clinton-led effort, likening it to the movie “Charlie Wilson’s War,” the story of a Congressman who thought it was a good idea to supply Stinger missiles to the mujahideen in Afghanistan during their fight to overthrow the Russians. “It’s as if Hillary and the others just watched that movie and said ‘Hey, let’s do that!’” the diplomat said.

National Review’s Jim Geraghty, who reviewed several public reports regarding the movement of Stinger missiles in Libya, insists the diplomats’ account can be corroborated and contradicted. His report highlights several critical elements, noting that rebel leaders did request the missiles, including Abdul Hakim Al-Hasadi, who was detained in Pakistan as a hostile combatant by U.S. forces in 2002 “while returning from Afghanistan where I fought against foreign invasion,” according to Al-Hasadi himself.

As for the U.S. directly supplying missiles to the rebels, Geraghty cites two different New York Times reports revealing other possibilities. The first report notes that the rebels were securing such missiles from the Gaddafi regime’s captured storage bunkers. The second report was far more devastating to the Obama administration, noting that it gave its blessing to Qatar to ship arms to the insurgency, before becoming “alarmed” that the weapons were ending up in the hands of “Islamic militants.” The Times insisted there was no evidence that such missiles were linked to the Benghazi attacks. But considering there’s been no specific identification of the Qatari weapons or the specific ordnance used to attack the consulate, such claims are dubious at best. Geraghty further notes that such shipments violate UN Resolution 270 prohibiting the direct or indirect sale or transfer of weapons to any party in Libya.

Thus, who sold Stinger missiles to the rebels remains in question. However, the diplomats’ contention regarding Stevens’ real mission in Benghazi was buttressed by an Oct. 23, 2011 column in The Telegraph. Reporter Con Coughlin revealed that “teams of CIA officers, supported by other intelligence services such as Britain’s MI6, have been scouring Libya in search of the missing missiles” following the fall of Gaddafi’s regime in August. Reuters further noted that the consulate “had been a base for, among other things, collecting information on the proliferation of weaponry looted from Libyan government arsenals, including surface-to-air missiles,” a fact inadvertently revealed during a House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform hearing about security lapses in Benghazi. The day after that hearing Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank accused Republicans of “boneheaded questioning” of State Department witnesses that left little doubt that the consulate was a “CIA base.”

Geraghty sums up his investigative report with the other major, but as yet unsubstantiated, reason the CIA was in Benghazi. “During this time, a large number of weapons, including anti-aircraft missiles, were leaving Libya and arriving in Turkey en route to Syrian rebels–and the CIA had personnel in both countries assigned to monitor and assist the arms shipments.”

The diplomats contend the whistleblowers will report that Stevens was attempting to procure the Stingers. This does not negate the possibility that the effort was being done to arm Syrian rebels, absent involvement that could be directly traced back to the Obama administration. It is worth remembering that in assisting the overthrow of Gaddafi, Obama violated the War Powers Act of 1973 requiring Congressional approval of the use military force after 60 days. The president sidestepped it by asserting that no American troops were put in harm’s way. If the administration is arming Syrian rebels, it would appear that both Resolution 270 and the War Powers Act are once again irrelevant, as far as the administration is concerned.

As troubling as the first assertion made by the diplomats is, the second one is far more damning. Their contacts insist that AFRICOM had Special Ops “assets in place that could have come to the aid of the Benghazi consulate immediately” (emphasis mine). They further insist that it will be revealed the White house told Ham to stand down, and when he refused, the White House “called his deputy and had the deputy threaten to relieve Ham of his command.”

Ham retired as head of AFRICOM in April. Yet the announcement of his retirement was released by the Defense Department on Oct 31, 2012. It said that Ham would eventually step down, even as he retained “the full confidence of the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,” according to Pentagon Press Secretary George Little, who further noted Ham’s decision to retire was “entirely personal.”

It was also unusual. Ham was removed from a position with a three year rotation well short of that mark. On October 25, 2012, former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta insisted that, with regard to a rescue operation “you don’t deploy forces into harm’s way without knowing what’s going on; without having some real-time information about what’s taking place, and as a result of not having that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area, Gen. Ham, Gen. Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation.”

Yet Ham himself never referenced any discussions with Panetta or Dempsey when he told Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) he was never given the order to secure the Benghazi consulate. Chaffetz also said Ham told him forces were available and “had proximity” to the consulate.

Obviously, whistleblowers providing credible information on both topics would prove invaluable with regard to giving Americans the truth about what happened on September 11, 2012, as a well as a motive for the administration’s disinformation campaign. If Hillary Clinton gave the OK to sell missiles to “insurgents,” her judgement at the very least, would be called into question, putting her chances of securing the Democratic nomination for president in 2016 in serious jeopardy. It would also reveal the utter callousness and calculated mendacity of a woman who knows full well “what difference at this point” such a revelation would make.

Yet whistleblower testimony regarding pressure to avoid rescuing Americans–that could possibly be corroborated by the former head of AFRICOM– would deal this administration a blow from which it might never recover. Americans may countenance many things, but the idea that we would abandon Americans under fire in Benghazi to protect the Obama administration’s pre-election narrative that terror was “on the run” isn’t one of them. Nothing would make Obama’s promise to “fundamentally transform the United States of America ring any more hollow than that.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

  • AdinaK

    The skeletons re Benghazigate are rattling to fevered pitch, and no one should doubt that many from Obama Inc will become ensnared. At the tippy top lies the wayward Commander-in-Chief, and for more than meets the eye –

    PAST time to smoke it out.

    Adina Kutnicki, Israel

    • waynamal

      Interesting in a constitutional republic good servants such as General Ham are fired for doing their job. Obama and his administration put politics ahead of the safety of Americans. All Americans directly under this man's control is at risk for politics.

    • waynamal

      Adina thank you for your website link. I to have asked the question since they started to lie to us the next day. What and Where was Barack? If he was AWOL who gave the "Stand Down" order. Did Hillary cover for Barack.

    • kikorikid

      Just read your homepage statement.
      The last sentence told me you are on it!
      The RED/GREEN ALLIANCE is here….

    • catherineinpvb

      As far as Obama,Inc. – and ilk – are concerned; we are still dealing with teflon. Nonetheless; an authentic history deserves the 'light of day'. And if enough integrity in the process – perhaps; the worst of these; Obama and/or those who serve him; will actually be held accountable.

  • Americano

    More and more, the Obama Administration tries to spin this away and control the narrative, but it's not working. There is absolutely no justification for leaving those men there to die. None. And they know it. The more they've tried to spin this thing, the more information keeps coming out.
    The blood of Christopher Stevens, Glenn Doherty, Sean Smith, and Tyrone Woods (my apologies if I got any of their names wrong) screams out for justice. May justice be done.

  • Mary Sue

    Maybe there's 1/4 of a chance of this going anywhere if they manage to clean out the Senate of a bunch of idiot dems next year.

    • Guest

      Mary Sue you are right…The Senate Dems are keeping Congress from doing a lot for 'We The People'..I really hope and Pray that our W.H will be free of the lieing Liberals…People are tired of the Liberal liars.They don't like the American People…BUT they LOVE blowing our money….

  • truebearing

    And suddenly it appears that Stevens was in fact, hung out to dry. Surely, both Hillary and Obama knew of Stevens role, yet still refused him security or a rescue, though knowing he was there to deal with Al Queda, or more dangerously, prevent them from getting the shoulder fired missiles. Obviously, Hillary knew. She's the one who sent him to Benghazi … to take one for the team, apparently. Either way, Stevens should have been given a sizable security force….and a heartfelt rescue attempt…but maybe it was determined that he was too politically radioactive for the ambitions of a sitting president and a presidential hopeful. One can't take chances with ambassadors who know too much… or commerce secretaries who are about to be indicted.

    But wait…what am I saying? No Leftist would sacrifice a human life (or 150,000,000) just to acquire or hold onto power.

    • wolfeatworld

      truebearing –– excellent observations, as usual.

      • truebearing

        Thank you.

    • Jerry G

      Are you suggesting that Steven's name be added to that long list of deaths of persons related in one way or another to the Clintons' machinations who may have known too much? Vince Foster and Ron Brown are names that come to mind.

      • truebearing

        Yes, I am. Obama, Clinton, Soros, et al are so ruthless that virtually anyone is expendable if they threaten their political power.

  • pierce

    No Leftist would sacrifice 4 human lives, but that is what Hilary and Barack did. And just to become President for 4 more years, and resign from the job as Secretary of State, and lie to the American people, and so she can run for President after Barack can no longer be our glorious leader.
    Is it finally catching up to them? It is becoming more and more evident that the plan is unraveling.
    Power and greed are disgusting, and ineptness in dealing with tough problems is wrong.
    Off with their heads, as pirates might say. One gone, one to go.

  • PAthena

    Remember Vince Foster, lawyer (?) for President Clinton, dealing with the Clinton's legal problems in Arkansas, who was murdered (said falsely to have committed suicide)?

    • Viet Vet

      An interesting sidenote here: It's been awhile since I read this, and I still may have it in one of my books around here, but I well remember the jist of the information. That there were people who knew that Hillary and Vince Foster had an affair. And that Chelsea is Vince Foster and Hillary Klinton's daughter. This is corroborated by Bill Klinton himself. After he raped Juanita Broaderick, he got up, walked to the door, turned around and said two things to Juanita lying on the bed. First he told her that she should get some ice on her lip (Klinton had clamped her lip in his teeth and bit down when ever she struggled), Then he told her she didn't have to worry about getting pregnant, because he had mumps when he was a kid.

  • dougjmiller

    The only happy ending to this story would be full disclosure. Disgust and outrage from the American people would lead to impeachment of Obama. However, the media would cover for him 24/7, minimizing, excusing and sweeping it under the rug. Obama will bury the facts

    • Guest

      What does anyone think about the Obamacare? Pelosi got 51 Dems. to sign it without reading it behind closed doors…Plus we read where all of them got a big bonus from $200,000 to $ 220,000 plus we read where Pelosi got $3,000,000…That signing behind closed doors seems illegal to me….Plus we read where the bonuses came out of Social Security…..Is that treating the Senior Citizens' right????

    • Viet Vet

      The dem media will certainly do whatever they can to protect Obummer and the Hildabeast.

  • κατεργάζομαι

    THE GERMANE QUESTION: Where was Barack Obama during those seven hours?
    And WHO was in charge of the United States security decisions?

    Who is surprised by another media free pass for Obama? A fraternal kinship may be the reason why the mainstream media failed to properly vet presidential candidate Barack Obama and his illicit drug use back in 2008 and they are doubling-down in their effort to shroud him even now.

    Barack Obama boasted that he was not a lightweight like President Bill Clinton, who claimed that he "never inhaled." Obama was a proud sage — an accomplished drug user who bragged about consuming c0ca!ne and maariju@na.

    And who hasn't seen photos of him at banquets; hoisting a glass of wine where he looked more toasted than Toast Master?

    Am I the only one to suspect that our Commander in Chief was not in full executive command of himself during those seven Lost Weekend-type hours?

    ……jus sayn'………..

    We are all damaged by the lies, cover-ups, and corruption. Boehner is acting in concert with the three Scandelabras' Obfuscation. We must replace Boehner with someone more intelligent and competent.

    • WilliamJamesWard

      Ted Cruz?…………………………William

      • κατεργάζομαι

        Replying to WilliamJamesWard

        RE: a replacement for Boehner

        William, did you intend Ted Cruz as a replacement for Mitch McConnell – GOP Senate Minority Leader? I don't know that I would want Senator Cruz's focus divided at this juncture. Pray continually for Cruz's boldness, strength and continued "Godly Wisdom". Whatta leader!

        • WilliamJamesWard

          What was I thinking, somehow Ted Cruz comes to mind every time Washington
          is mentioned and the problems there without leadership surface. I am sold on him
          from what I have learned so far, is it possible I say to myself that we have a gift
          from God here and he is going to be the game changer. I would have him replace
          Obamma, prayer will move those graced with talents made for todays needs.
          Good catch, thanks! ……………………William

  • Matt Bracken

    The question of Obama's missing 8 hours is the key to understanding the lack of a Benghazi rescue attempt. Only the POTUS and no other human on earth can grant cross-border authority for an armed mission across an international border. Obama didn't need to issue a "stand down order" for the special ops forces outside Libya, all he had to do was disappear for the night. No POTUS, no CBA, no rescue. __I've been writing about this since last October. _ __So far, only Jeanine Pirro and Mark Levin have picked up the CBA theme. (I tweeted the articles to every reporter and talking head I could find. Judge Pirro thanked me and uses CBA frequently on her Fox show.)__

    • Stephen_Brady

      Matt, I was a member of the 101st Airborne in Vietnam, and a sniper. After I could no longer serve … due to wounds received … I went overseas, nonetheless, primarily on training missions, but on "other" missions, as well. The reason that there are "mercenaries"? CBA, of course. A private citizen can travel to another country and take on a mission that the government would never risk.

      Thanks for your service, Matt, and on this Memorial Day, I recall with fondness my best friend and spotter, Donald "Smitty" Smith, who died in May, 1969. Lest we forget …

      • WilliamJamesWard

        Thank you for being and American Patriot and for your service…………….William

        • Stephen_Brady

          Thank you. It was my honor.

          • truebearing

            And you deserve honor for it. Thanks.

    • truebearing

      Obama's passivity is his strategy to weaken the nation. He thinks that by not making a decision, he can't be held accountable. By not acting in the Benghazi assassination, he sentenced 4 Americans to death, but he assumed there would be no witnesses to accuse him and no media to attack him. He figured that as long things were murky enough, he couldn't be blamed, but he arrogantly forgot about people like yourself who know the drill and aren't afraid to speak up.

      Not only is Obama covering up what he authorized with regard to the Manpads, he has to cover up his depraved indifference to attacks on sovereign American soil that left 4 good Americans dead.This mkes Watergate look like a jaywalking ticket.

      Thanks for your service and continued courage. Just last night I watched several episodes of Ultimate Warfare, including the battle at Kandahar. I was asking myself all night long: "Could I do that?" I have to admit, I had my doubts. God Bless you, and all who have fought for this nation.

    • Viet Vet

      That reminds me of when Bill Klinton went and hid after getting word a call was coming for the authority of a seal team to take bin Laden out. Bill stayed hidden until the window had closed and the moment had passed. We know this because Sandy Burger, Klinton's Natl Security Advisor related the information. Sandy's name of course was later changed to Burglar after he stole documents from the National Archives and destroyed them.

    • http://facebook LauraThompson

      Glenn Beck talked about this 3 days after the attack and so this story confirms EVERYTHING he proclaimed that day. It's just that no one wants to credit Beck with the knowledge. I think he has key connections in high up places.

  • Matt Bracken

    I was a Navy SEAL officer who led a navspecwar det to Beirut in 1983, and that's how I know about CBA. It was hammered into our heads that ONLY the POTUS can grant CBA. No president wants to stumble into a war because a jet jockey or specops leader wandered across a frontier by mistake. International borders are sacrosanct. All of the specops forces in Europe would have geared up for an all-out rescue attempt the minute the emergency calls went out from Benghazi. But if Obama hid out for the night….no rescue. __Obama broke the faith: he betrayed his missing ambassador and other Americans under fire. __BTW, an ambassador is equal in rank to a four-star general. Ambassador Stevens was missing and presumed in Al Qaeda hands, and Obama's response was to literally run and hide, in order to not be put on the spot to grant CBA. He is a traitor, backstabber, liar and coward.

    • Stella

      Thank you Matt, many Americans are feeling the same way but are afraid to say so. As you mention Extortion 17 has many questions left unanswered. Sadly, by the time investigations and answers come forward damage is done and he will be out of office and probably the country.

    • reader

      Matt, thanks for the service and for the insight. Just curious, what do you think about rumors that Stevens was set up to being kidnapped and exchanged for the Blind Sheikh?

    • Asher

      The reason Benghazi has reached a fever pitch is because there are so many Americans who love our military and our country. We will not allow a traitor to get by with failure to support our military and our american personel, and allow terrorists to get away with what they did! I can only imagine the anger of the teams who were ready to go on the rescue mission and told to Stand Down…I think the Brits have had it with this politically correct crap to protect the sanctity of Islam too and not call them terorists or Jihadists.

  • Matt Bracken

    __Incidentally, the two greatest losses of life by Navy SEALs both occurred on rescue missions in A-stan, when packed helos crashed or were shot down. American specops warriors NEVER say what Panetta said, that they won't go on a rescue mission without perfect knowledge. Americans ALWAYS rescue other Americans under fire, even at tremendous risk. Until Obama, the coward and liar.

    • Asher

      Right On…This has been a code of honor, and the way things are done in this country!

  • KK

    DON’T let your congressman get distracted by the IRS scandal. They knew about that for more than a year, and timed the release of the information for now because Benghazi is so hot, and they need to find something to distract us from it. The IRS ‘scandal’ was ordered from the white house, and we can get back to that later. But for now, we need to hear these ‘whistleblowers’ before they wind up like Brietbart. People need prison time over Benghazi. The IRS has not killed anyone (yet) and their administrators can sweat it out while we deal with Benghazi, THEN abolish the IRS and institute a fair tax.

    • Viet Vet

      The IRS is poised to kill people via Obummercare.

      But I see there is at least one other person who wonders if Brietbart died a natural death.

  • thewestisbest

    "…the idea that we would abandon Americans under fire in Benghazi to protect the Obama administration’s pre-election narrative that terror was “on the run” isn’t one of them. Nothing would make Obama’s promise to “fundamentally transform the United States of America ring any more hollow than that."

    On the contrary, Mr. Ahlert._If anything, this affair makes the socialists' promise and intent to "fundamentally transform" (which, of course, means to destroy) America clearer than ever.

  • Matt Bracken

    Here is a good link to the PJ Media story on Cross-Border Authority.

  • thewestisbest

    "…the idea that we would abandon Americans under fire in Benghazi to protect the Obama administration’s pre-election narrative that terror was “on the run” isn’t one of them. Nothing would make Obama’s promise to “fundamentally transform the United States of America ring any more hollow than that."

    Actually, it is much more accurate to say that,

    "Nothing makes Obama's promise to destroy ("fundamentally transform") America any more clear than that…."

    • Asher

      Its not going to be put to rest either…no matter what we have to do to propel our representatives into action!

    • Viet Vet

      Yeah, I caught that too.

  • Volvulus

    On the Iran-Contras affair:

    Notes taken on December 7, 1985, by Weinberger record that Reagan said that “he could answer charges of illegality but he couldn’t answer charge [sic] that ‘big strong President Reagan passed up a chance to free hostages.'”. (–Contra_affair).

    • Volvulus

      2 thumbs down. Ok. But nevertheless, Reagan was a man with enough moral integrity to rather face charges of illegality in an attempt to take care of his people abroad, than doing nothing. Greatest President ever! How this compares to Benghazigate? Go figure.

    • Asher

      Slick Willie also abandoned our troops in Mogadeshu…Black Hawk Down!

      • Viet Vet

        Yep Asher, and no less an authority than bin Laden said in an interview that Klinton's retreat from Somalia was what emboldened them to begin planning the 9/11 attack.

        Of course Klinton's 8 year policy of Islamofascist terrorist appeasement led directly to the 9/11 attack and the deaths of 3000 souls. He appeased the first TC bombing, the Barracks and Embassy in Africa and the bombing of the Cole.

      • Viet Vet

        Mr Reagan actually got one Iranian Hostage released before a media reprobate got ahold of the information and blew the cover. They would have gotten them all released otherwise, and of course the munitions sold to the Iranians would have been used up in a week or two, since they were in a war with Iraq at the time. The other side of that equation, Nicaragua, Reagan was trying (and succeeded) in keeping the Contra freedom fighters viable. The democraps supported Daniel Ortega and the communist Sandinistas and sought to limit Reagan's ability to help the Contras. Thus they passed the unconstitutional Boland Amendment, which was a violation of the Separation of Powers. The dems went so far in order to help the Sandinistas that House Speaker Jim Wright (d-tx) wrote Ortega to ask him if he could hold the atrocities down somewhat as a vote on Contra Aid was coming up for a vote. And of course the good old democrap media was in full support of the communists in Nicaragua.

  • WilliamJamesWard

    Hillary Clinton will no doubt have some saying attributed to her in history books if any and I
    am wondering which of the two will be her tag……….."I don't recall" or "…….who cares".

  • D-Boy

    Impeach Obama for aid and comfort to our enemies, Treason! When do the American people start protesting this traitors' action and call for his impeachment. And he is telling us through the UN that we will not have free speech when speaking of islam. We will overcome…

  • WilliamJamesWard

    A silent troll cruises the page……………….William

  • FairWitness

    I am sickened by these latest revelations. How on God's green earth did the Obama Administration and the State Department think putting stinger missiles in the hands of Libyan rebels was a good idea? Dangerous amateurs.

    I have long thought the President was otherwise engaged on Sept. 11, 2012, because there has been no accounting of his whereabouts. It's obvious he wasn't available for decisions.

    What I don't understand is WHY didn't someone else at the White House step up? Where were James Clapper, John Brennan, James "Jim" Jones, Dennis Blair, Tom Donilon – are any of these men actually MEN? How about Vice President Biden, Secretary Panetta, Madame Secretary Clinton? Do you mean to tell us that not one of these heavyweights at the White House thought to rescue our people?

    This can all be explained by blaming the reelection campaign? It defies logic. Americans wouldn't have blamed them had they gone after the terrorists – even with a bad outcome. But doing NOTHING? There was something far more sinister going on here, something that had to be covered up to avoid prison.

    I pray the whistleblowers live to tell their stories. If this regime would sacrifice their own Ambassador Stevens, what chance do they have?

    • Viet Vet

      They are supporting and funding and arming the Syrian rebels who are al Qaeda.

  • FairWitness

    I'm reminded of the story of the frog and the scorpion.

    How can progressive ideology so cloud rational judgment? You don't put dangerous weapons into the hands of the enemy. Like giving F16s and tanks to the Muslim Brotherhood led Egypt …. or stinger missiles to rebels in Libya (who turned out to be al Qaeda).

    I know a lady from Syria who tells me that Bashar Assad is far better than the rebels. I suspected as much. Every time we topple a Middle East dictator, more brutal, more dangerous regimes take their places. Are we about to do this again?

    • watsa46

      The American factories need to produce. Therefore we need to give weapons and planes to some people. Forgot the military-industrial complex needs?

    • Viet Vet

      Absolutely, look at Jimmah Kaatah allowing the Shau in Iran to be deposed. I just posted above that this regime is also supporting, funding and arming the Syrian rebels, who are al Qaeda. It's like having rank amateurs in charge of our foreign policy. It's absolutely unbelievable.

      • WilliamJamesWard

        It may not be what we think it is, The Obama regeme has and agenda hidden and evil
        that does not include any transparancy or truth of any kind. Confusion is easy in
        the ongoing battles of who is just who but the aim is taking control and power to
        create a cohesive force with the union of Islamic States intending to subjugate
        as much of the World as is possible, thier colonists have Europe and are here.

    • anon

      The main litmus test for any leader we install is that he be completely subservient to Wash DC. Whatever he does to control his people is up to him.

  • watsa46

    Who cares about disgrace. We need all the facts and decide accordingly what to do. No biases please.

    • KornQueen

      The actual truth will never be admitted to or acknowledged. Anyone who observes and "knows" cowardly liberals, can glean the truth from their non-actions and protestations ….
      Tying the truth to obama, in the minds of his 51% moron voting block, is another big challenge….

      • Viet Vet

        Most of the low-information types, don't have a clue about Benghazi, never will, and don't care.

  • Ragnar

    Thank you Pathena, for remembering Vince Foster. Remember Craig Livingstone??? "Tainted blood" sold to the Canadians. Small caliber bullet hole behind Vince's left ear while he was sitting in his car in the White House parking lot? His office ransacked by Hillary? My old bumper sticker reads

    • Viet Vet

      Yes indeed I remember Livingstone. And Foster's body later ends up in Ft. Marcy Park. Linda Tripp was a secretary in Vince Foster's office, in fact served him his last meal, and reported the ransacking of his office files afterwards.

      • anon

        Vince appears to have been suicided. He knew too much and maybe was too close to Hillary.

        • Viet Vet

          Yep, Vince was really 'into' Hillary, and I don't think Bill liked it too much.

  • Winston

    It should not come as a great surprise to learn from "whistleblowers" that Obama and Hillary let the American Ambassador and three other Americans get murdered needlessly because the Ambassador was a CIA front man to sell/give powerful military weaponry to the Islamic Brotherhood and other radical terrorists in Libya to cover their arses from cirminal prosecution. Hillary has a history of this anyway going back to her own "Whitewater" scandal and the sudden suspicious "suicide" of White House counsel Vince Foster… I say suspicious suicide because Foster was shot in the head but a gun was never found at the death scene and his body had been moved from the site of "suicide". So, how can a suicide victim move his own dead body and shoot himself in the head without a gun?

    • Viet Vet

      I think your question is rhetorical.

    • anon

      I think only Obama could have given the "stand down" order to the general. So Obama very likely is involved. The whistleblowers in this case know the risks and might dilute their testimony to save their skin and that of their families.

    • Ellman

      In the alternate reality in which the Clintons and fellow leftists live all things 'impossible' become 'possible' and confirmed as legitimate by their sycophantic liberal media dogs.

  • Obama Guy

    More Benghazi Whistleblowers (the crowd laughs). Uh, O.K., whatever you say. Just sad people.

  • fanlad

    It must follow, that this administration using the I.R.S., justice department, labor department, the F.B.I., and the E.P.A. (to name a few) to go after their political enemies , is also using the services of the C.I.A. and other intelligence departments to intimidate and cover up, and lots more.
    Calling all patriots, that will honor their oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America, to come forward and put these false narratives to bed. America is calling.
    We must keep digging for the shining light of the truth, it must be found. There is evil in this world.
    For the patriots out there, thanks for your service.

  • Mike215

    There are a lot of retarded people on this site. They really believe that if the president is impeached, then he can be hanged. But that is not the constitution says. The House can pass a bill of impeachment, but the senate has to hold a trial. Since the senate is controlled by the Democrats, then there will be no trial or at one in the next ten years.
    When Senator Reid gets the bill of impeachment from the House, as speaker, he can take it and put into the garbage can. When they tried to get Clinton, the stupid Republicans controlled the Senate, but could not get the 2/3 vote to convict . And Clinton’s poll numbers actually went up and the Democrats won many seats in the next election.

  • Michael Cohen

    Obama will be around for the next four years because the Democrats control the senate and if there is a bill of impeachment in the House, it has to go to the senate for a trial. At that point, Senator Reid can take the bill and throw it in the trash can. So everybody on this site who hates the president better realize that no matter what you throw at him, the constitution protects him. You are wasting your time.