Obama: Back to the Racist Future

obama-angry1-600x350America is enduring an ever-increasing spiral of heinous black-on-white violence. Less than a week after 22-year-old Australian baseball player Christopher Lane was allegedly executed by three “bored” wannabe gang-bangers, 88-year-old World War II veteran Delbert “Shorty” Belton was allegedly beaten to death by two 16-year-old black American teens, Demetrius Glenn and Kenan D. Adams-Kinard, both of whom have histories of violent crime. In Poughkeepsie, NY, 20-year-old Javon Tyrek Rogers has been charged with first degree murder and first degree burglary in the killing of 99-year-old Fannie Gumbinger. On August 13, two black male youths and their female accomplice were charged with robbing and killing 27-year-old David Santucci in Memphis, TN. Despite these and other incidents, President Obama, Democrats, and the usual gaggle of racial arsonists remain conspicuously silent. That is no accident. All of them have a vested interest in turning back the clock on race relations and they have all played a role in where we are today.

Despite their selective caution in bringing race politics into cases such as those mentioned above, President Obama and his race agitator allies have no problem whatsoever with rushing to judgment and rashly injecting themselves into highly sensitive and controversial situations. Recall when Cambridge police arrested Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. Obama said it was self-evident that the department “acted stupidly” for arresting someone at their own house, ceding to the narrative that the police likely only arrested Gates because he was black and therefore suspicious. In fact, the police only arrested Gates because he embarked on an enraged tirade and became belligerent and disorderly.

In the Trayvon Martin case, Obama contended a son of his would look like Martin, or that he himself could have been Martin “35 years ago.” In his second speech regarding Martin, Obama did comment on the reality of runaway violence committed overwhelmingly by black American males, but then excused the behavior because “some of the violence that takes place in poor black neighborhoods around the country is born out of a very violent past in this country, and that the poverty and dysfunction that we see in those communities can be traced to a very difficult history.”

Meanwhile, the president’s solutions for stemming the violence implied that “the system” was to blame and that it needed to be fixed. Obama urged his followers to “work with law enforcement about training at the state and local levels in order to reduce the kind of mistrust in the system that sometimes currently exists” and “to examine some state and local laws to see if it–if they are designed in such a way that they may encourage the kinds of altercations and confrontations and tragedies that we saw in the Florida case, rather than diffuse potential altercations.”

Perhaps the president could explain how “mistrust in the system” caused two black 16-year-olds to douse a 13-year-old white boy with gasoline and set him on fire in Kansas City in March of 2012. Or why a group of black neighbors brutally assaulted Matthew Owen with with bats, brass knuckles, a chair, a paint can and other objects “for Trayvon” in Mobile, AL in April of 2012. Or why six “bored” black youths beat a 46-year-old white Ohio man so savagely last August that they may face additional charges in the man’s death this past July. Or why 18-year-old De’Marquise Elkins allegedly murdered 13-month-old Antonio Santiago. Or why three 15-year-old black teens brutally beat up a 13-year-old white teen on a Florida school bus earlier this month.

None of those incidents, or the disturbing phenomenon of black flash mob attacks on whites that regularly occur in cities such as Baltimore, Philadelphia, Chicago, Milwaukee, or Washington, D.C. had anything to do with the “system,” nor did they merit a single word of condemnation from the president, or any other the demagogues who usually seek to turn any incident of white on black crime into a national conversation — a one-sided conversation that is invariably an indictment of an irredeemably racist America itself.

These race agitators, however, never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity to put the blame exactly where it belongs, namely, on the legions of violent thugs who commit murder and mayhem without the slightest hint of remorse. As for the poverty and dysfunction that allegedly underpins this mayhem, it’s about time the Democratic Party owned up to the reality that no one has facilitated that history more than Democrats themselves, courtesy of Great Society programs that incentivized the destruction of the nuclear family, and an out-of-wedlock birth rate in the black American community that has now reached 73 percent.

Furthermore, Democrats can’t plead ignorance about those consequences. They were warned by Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who wrote “The Negro Family: The Case for National Action” in 1965. “There is one unmistakable lesson in American history,” Moynihan said, “a community that allows a large number of men to grow up in broken families, dominated by women, never acquiring any stable relationship to male authority, never acquiring rational expectations about the future–that community asks for and gets chaos.” Naturally, Moynihan was excoriated and his report was dismissed as “racist propaganda.”

Nearly 50 years later, nothing in that regard has changed. Even as the chaos and social disintegration occurring on a routine basis in many black American communities continues, anyone who challenges the Democratic contention that black Americans are largely victims of forces beyond their control — all of which require big-government solutions implemented by Democrats — is branded a racist. But few things are more racist, hypocritical and immoral than the political party that founded the KKK espousing a mode of governance that has robbed millions of black American youths of their dignity, integrity and, ultimately, their decency, while they themselves look the other way and lead lynch mobs against racial scapegoats.

Yet for the self-anointed “civil rights” leaders such a status quo is something to be encouraged, not disbanded. Perpetual dependency is good for the party that promotes dependency, and perpetual race conflict is good for the party that purports to be devoted to “addressing” race conflicts. Nurturing the racial divide is a core component of the Democratic Party’s political strategy. As long as the perception of white mistreatment of blacks is alive, the left’s race-hatred industry will always be relevant. The more distorted and exaggerated the fear, the more power flows to those who would exploit it. The more it is exploited, the more we are divided.

The Obama administration has been at the forefront of this exploitation. Eric Holder, who spoke out against voter ID laws and the Supreme Court decision overturning Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act at the Washington rally, continues to perpetrate the racial polarization that has become the hallmark of his tenure as head of the Justice Department. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius has compared opponents of ObamaCare to those who resisted the civil rights reforms of the 1960s. Former Assistant Attorney General and current Labor Secretary Thomas Perez has promoted hate crimes prosecution insisting, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that such crimes remain a mostly white-on-black problem.

And then there is Ayo Kimathi. The acquisitions officer for Immigration and Customs Enforcement–in charge of buying weapons and ammunition for the government–was put on paid leave by the DHS, for running a website on which he warned Americans about the coming race war. According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, the website declares, “in order for Black people to survive the 21st century, we are going to have to kill a lot of whites–more than our Christian hearts can possibly count.” One of his former supervisors was “astounded he’s employed by the federal government, let alone Homeland Security.”

Sadly, it isn’t astounding, any more than the deafening silence of a president who is in the unprecedented position of being the one leader who could speak to black America with the kind of credibility no one else can match. But as long as Obama, Democrats, the racial agitators and their media enablers can exploit the carnage, turning back the clock on race relations is a winning scenario. For the rest of the nation, it is an unmitigated tragedy.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • Paula Douglas

    The idea that we need “to examine some state and local laws to see if it–if they are designed in such a way that they may encourage the kinds of altercations and confrontations and tragedies that we saw in the Florida case, rather than diffuse potential altercations,” is transparently another attack on Stand Your Ground laws. Even a vaporing simp like Obama doesn’t believe that state and local laws are considered by the kind of sub-animal thugs who would beat an 88 year-old man to death.

  • Jared

    The questions the American people need to ask themselves is simple, How can Obama or who ever he is, continue to get away with the things he does? Why is it no one around him has said anything? Why are there more and more Black on White crimes and why is there such a media silence over them? What have the democrats got on their insipid leader or better still, what has HE got on THEM? Has Obama surrounded himself with a criminal element that he can control? and, If he goes down, who will go with him and is that why they are fawning over this criminal and his floozy? What ever the reasons behind his rise to power, you can bet he won’t want to give it up easily, in fact, just before the next Presidential election campaign he will announce that he has removed section 14 restrictions and will run again. and you know what? I bet you idiots will vote him in again. Why don’t the American people exercise their God given rights and remove this criminal, by force if necessary. Doesn’t your beloved constitution allow for that?

    • MrUniteUs1

      You mean like inheriting an economy losing 800,000 jobs month and turning it into one gaining 200,000 jobs a month, while doubling the stock market,and keeping inflation low, and saving the car industry, and wall street. Oh financing that Iron Dome project Israel.

      • Jared

        Sorry, where did you get this misinformation? If you look at the figures, America has a debt that is now 4 times higher than when he took office. Sends more cash to terrorist organisations that it spends on its own people. Has seen ONE major city, OH that’s right, DETROIT, the HOME of the AUTOMOTIVE industry you quoted as being saved FILE FOR BANKRUPTCY. I think you have got all your wires crossed and are believing the lies told to you by this foreign criminal. You see, I have the advantage of being on the outside looking in and I am NOT blinkered by leftist propaganda being touted around the states praising KING BARRAK the first. The sooner he is removed from office the quicker a country that I do love will begin to heal. Congress and Obama need to stop sending so much money to Terrorists, fawning over the Muslim Brotherhood and actually wake up and see the damage that is being done not only to the world in the Name of Islam but also to America itself. So either the info coming out of America is false or you are living under a rock.

        • MrUniteUs1

          From the conservative Cato Institute.

          “We are told, because Obama ran up $1.4 trillion of debt in his first year.

          It’s true that the White House is pushing big spending items, not least of which is his multitrillion-dollar scheme for government-run health care. But many critics, either out of ignorance or malice, are blaming Obama for deficits that are not his fault.

          Some Republicans, for instance, complain that Obama tripled the budget deficit in his first year. This assertion is understandable, since the deficit jumped from about $450 billion in 2008 to $1.4 trillion in 2009. As this chart illustrates, with the Bush years in green, it appears as if Obama’s policies have led to an explosion of debt.But there is one rather important detail that makes a big difference. The chart is based on the assumption that the current administration should be blamed for the 2009 fiscal year.

          While this might make sense to a casual observer, it is largely untrue. The 2009 fiscal year began Oct. 1, 2008, nearly four months before Obama took office. The budget for the entire fiscal year was largely set in place while President Bush was in the White House.

          So if we update the chart to show the Bush fiscal years in green, we can see that Obama is mostly right in claiming that he inherited a mess.


          • Jared

            It is now 2013 and the American debt is above 16 trillion. Who is the President? Oh that’s right Obama. If he “inherited a mess” , he has had ample opportunity to clean the mess up. My original estimate of 4 times as much was far off the mark. Since 2009 when he took office the increase is 14 times larger. It may have been 1.4 trillion then, but in four years it has risen to over 16 trillion. So once again, looking from the outside in, I am right. Obama is trying his hardest to bankrupt America so his Muslim allies can just walk in and take over. Surely you must see that by now?

          • MrUniteUs1

            Jared ask someone to explain the difference between the national debt and budget deficit before you embarass youself

          • Jared

            Yep, you got me there. The budget deficit will be around 2 trillion dollars if trends stay as they are. The deficit being around that figure for the last 5 years. However reports indicate that this year could see it drop below the one trillion mark since Obama came to office. However that has still lead to an average increase of national debt of 2 trillion dollars year on year.and still Obama like our own Prime minister gives away money we simply don’t have. Perhaps we can agree on one thing, it is better NOT to give away cash you don’t have, get well within budget and work on reducing national debt along the way. Surely by staying within budget both the US and UK can work themselves out of their horrendous debt. So me earlier point is still in some ways valid. Oh and I still don’t like nor will I ever like Obama, he just doesn’t add up.

          • ziggy zoggy

            MrDivideUs0, give it up. Your lies are exposed. You are a paid troll for Obama Bin Laden and you are incapable of telling the truth.

      • nomoretraitors

        Since the bailouts were signed into law by Bush, then it was Bush who “saved” the auto industry and Wall Street (not that that made it right)

      • Gee

        You after Odumba CUT nearly all spending on Iron Dome and Congress not only restored the cuts, but added to that financing in direct opposite to the President?

        And by the way that garnered over 80% of the House and Senate, which why he didn’t veto it

      • Quagmire

        I like your satire. 200,000 jobs a month? Hilarious!

      • CowboyUp

        That’s an odd way of saying “the weakest American recovery ever,” and “job creation that doesn’t keep up with population increase.”

      • glpage

        The most jobs lost in one month was half a million, just a wee bit short of that 800K you stated. By the way, that crappy economy was caused by the idiocy of liberals and leftists forcing banks to make mortgage loans to people who couldn’t pay them, a situation Bush and his advisers mentioned to Congress which refused to listen. Those silly Democrats didn’t want to hear that policies they inflicted on our economy were probably going to lead to its collapse.


      • truebearing

        You idiot. The 200,000 jobs per month you cited, which I don’t buy to begin with, are mostly part time jobs — 80% — at minimum, or near minimum wage. That is laughable and pathetic.
        The stock market boom, which isn’t booming now, did so because of quantitative easing, ie. flooding the banking system with more and more money that is worth less and less, and will eventually trigger mutant inflation.
        He didn’t save the car industry. He used fascist tactics to steal from secured bondholders — a crime — and gave away Chrysler to a foreign firm, even though he had no authority to do so. GM still hasn’t paid back the many billions it owes from the bailout –a bailout that wasn’t necessary if Obama had just let them declare bankruptcy. In fact, had GM and Chrysler gone through bankruptcy, they’d be far better off because many ot the ridiculous costs imposed by unions would have been eliminated by the court.
        Ford is doing the best and Obama had NOTHING to do with Ford’s bounce back. it’s far more accurate to say: “The auto industry is recovering despite Obama.
        Sorry to rain on your delusional…or is it dishonest, parade.

        • Micha_Elyi

          I laugh at the Democrat True Believers who now cheer for the part time burger-flipping dead end jobs that they once condemned.

          But it’s different now, they say. Instead of being the unskilled worker’s first rung on the ladder toward good jobs that pay a living wage, those jobs are now the pinnacle of a college grad’s lifetime career prospects in the Obamatopia. Mmm mmm mmm.

      • common sense

        There are less capable working age Americans employed now than in early the 70’s, when most women didn’t work. That point shows you don’t understand the unemployment numbers which is under 14% solely because people who have given up and living off the government in permanent destitution aren’t even counted. The stock market rebound has been facilitated by QE 1 (bush) and the much more expensive QE 2 & 3. Saving the car industry? seriously? Chrysler is a foreign company, Ford didn’t use ANY of his or Bush’s help, and GM is moving plants overseas. And not to mention, the first round of money again, was given to the auto industry by Bush. Every single thing you used to support your argument is completely false or simply a continuation of his idiot predecessor.

    • Mlm46

      Please don’t include me with “you idiots will vote him in again”! Those idiots might but not I!

      • Jared

        Since I didn’t mention any one particular person but the American electorate, only you yourself would think that you were included in that statement. Since it was a generalisation I have to conclude that you consider yourself to be an idiot otherwise you wouldn’t have fallen in to the trap of commenting. Therefore to generalise, America voted for a criminal therefore America is full of idiots. Now that I really can’t fathom since I thought only my sorry nation was full of idiots who seem to follow along like little doggies behind America in whatever she chooses to do. I rather think that the American people, who by the way I would fight for wit everything I have, have woken up and will be watching Obama and his stooges very closely. The events in Syria that everyone is blaming on Assad will blow up in our faces and WE the common people will be left with egg on our faces for NOT standing up to the morons that WE elected. We, being the PEOPLE.

        • Mlm46

          When you wrote “you Idiots” you didn’t specify the ones who voted for him the first and second time! I was agreeing with you and you think I consider myself an idiot?

          • Jared

            Sorry, I misunderstood. Either way I hope that at some point the American people will come to their collective senses and remove Obama before he does irreparable damage to your Great country. Only when he has gone and some one who has the heart of the nation as their driving force will America begin to heal. May be then the rest of the world will follow. We sadly have to put up with our leader Mr Moron as we call him for another year. Next year the flood gates open to even more criminals from Romania who will swell the numbers already here illegally. We are still trying to get ourselves out of the EU but I fear it is too late. Add that to the growing problem with radical Islam and I can see my country having a civil war before too long. May be bot Britain and America could do with our own civil wars to clean house, so to speak.

          • Mlm46

            I sure hope the American people wake up soon too!

          • ziggy zoggy

            Cool Deathlok avatar.

  • MrUniteUs1

    White on White crime outnumbers Black on White crime 10 -1
    Suicide outnumbers homicide 2-1
    White suicide outnumbers Black and Hispanic Suicide 3-1
    Arnold Ahlert columnist currently contributing to JewishWorldReview.com,
    Can we mention Jewish crime. No matter how heinous the crime is
    i.e. David Berkhowitz Son of Sam or the Colombine killers.

    • steve

      Curious omissions: whites outnumber blacks 10 to 1. Therefore, the first statement indicates….balance (if there can be such a thing in the horror of crime.) Because there are 10 times as many whites, white suicides should outnumber black suicides 10-1….therefore, blacks are committing suicide at a rate 3 times more than whites…. and….by what factor does black-on-white crime outnumber white-on-black crime? Probably about 10,000 to 1.

      • MrUniteUs1

        Here is a chart comparing suicide rates.


        • BenJabo1Machal

          Howza about your adding your own name

        • tagalog

          It’s not surprising that blacks commit suicide in larger numbers per capita; they’ve been taught that all the world must bow before them, then they get into the real world and discover that they have to get to work, get their hands dirty, and all that acting white kind of stuff along with all the rest of us.

          No wonder so many of them work in the public sector; in the private sector, they expect results.

          • MrUniteUs1

            You’re ass backwards. Take another look a the chart and you see that the suicide rates of white men are more than double that of Black, Asian, and Hispanic men.

        • Micha_Elyi

          Interesting. Your charts claim the highest suicide rates are suffered by white men. In the college Grievance Studies classes and their textbooks, it’s an article of faith that a higher suicide rate proves the group in question suffers oppression and lower rates indicate the beneficiaries of privilege.

          • MrUniteUs1

            Why do you think the suicide rates are so much higher among white men?

    • Gee

      Compared to the population of Jews – they have one of these lowest crime rates in the country and the lowest violent crime rates.

      You are an anti-semite

    • glpage

      Check into black on white violent crime versus white on black. The idiot contention that whites are hunting down and killing blacks just is not supported by the facts. Check the FBI violent crime statistics.

    • tagalog

      What do these statistics have to do with anything involving black attitudes toward white people, attitudes that are shown to result in murder and violence inflicted on white people (often aged and defenseless white people) by black people?

      While you’re citing statistics, what are the statistics for white-on-black murder and violence of the types outlined in the account of several contemporary incidents?

    • BenJabo1Machal

      There are 10 times more whites than blacks in the USA, which you failed to mention
      Meanwhile the black population is American prisons is almost 50% of the inmates

  • http://www.clarespark.com/ Clare Spark

    I suppose the strategy of the liberal foundations in the late 1960s hasn’t curtailed “racial” animosities as predicted. I showed them conspiring in public right here: http://clarespark.com/2010/07/18/white-elite-enabling-of-black-power/. “White elite enabling of Black Power.” These materials were published by reputable presses, yet they have been ignored by the guilty liberal press, not to speak of separatist “African American” studies programs. To even bring this history out into the open has subjected me to cries of “racism”.

  • John Davidson

    You just cannot keep covering crap up with more crap.

    • Gee

      The Mass Media has done a very good job of doing exactly that for a long time now

  • nomoretraitors

    The problem will not be resolved until the victims FIGHT BACK. The only reason these thugs do this is because they know we won’t stand up for ourselves

    • Gee

      Because that ‘great legal mind’ Eric Holder will persecute any non-African American that does

      • nomoretraitors

        He can’t prosecute us all

        • comdog04

          he will try his best though.

      • Aeffesstoo

        The states need to put a stop to that.

    • Dallas25305

      Your right if I lived in the States a right to carry permit is the first thing I would want. It’s not safe in racist black areas. In my case I have always been good with guns since my youth on the farm. It’s better to be tried by 12 than carried by 6.

  • nomoretraitors

    Add 2 more to the list: Autumn Pasquale and the Millburn NJ home invasion (nj.com)

  • Mlm46

    A very well written article! It will most likely be denounced by the Dems/liberals as being racist!

  • USARetired

    In the socialist/communist book of rules, It is called ‘Divide and conquer, and O’Bozo is on a roll!’!

  • JVictor

    Good day, class. Today we will be looking at the evolution of the civil rights movement in the United States of America. In 1963, a man by the name of Martin Luther King, Jr. challenged the nation and the world to judge people based upon the content of their character, not the color of their skin. He attracted a huge following and was able to peacefully change the course of history. For the better part of 40 years, his message inspired millions to break the stronghold of racism in the United States.

    However, some of MLK’s “protégés” latched on to the idea that they could profit greatly by claiming to share his “dream” while hammering away at the differences between people of “color” and people who were white. One of the leaders of this group of pseudo-civil rights leaders even went so far as to use a girl to shamelessly and falsely accuse members of law enforcement of horrific crimes just so he could garner national attention. His name is Rev. Al Sharpton.

    In 2012, a 17 year-old named Trayvon Martin, who had a documentable history of using multiple drugs and illegal substances (he posted pictures of himself on Facebook as he was smoking marijuana, toxicology results of the autopsy performed on him after he died indicated that his liver was failing due to ingesting copious quantities of a street drug called “Purple Drank”) as well as having been found with stolen jewelry in his possession in his locker at school (by the way, he had a long history of truancy and was not anywhere close to having enough high school credit to graduate), became the poster child for Rev. Sharpton and others as what was wrong with race relations in the United States. Trayvon, who celebrated and joined into what was known as the “gangsta mentality,” died as a result of his assault on a neighborhood watch commander whose neighborhood had suffered a rash of break-ins. The watch commander acted in self-defense and was acquitted of any, some would say trumped up, charge filed against him.

    So the question is, who would you want your children to grow up and be like? Trayvon Martin? The Rev. Al Sharpton? Martin Luther King, Jr.? In this day and age, it appears that MLK’s dream is dying at the hands of the Sharptons of the world.

    • glpage

      Booker T. Washington described Al Sharpton perfectly well before Sharpton was born. Unfortunately, today’s black “leaders” have not risen to the level of Washington and King.

    • http://christdesert.org/ Clear&PresentDanger

      Have always thought that James Earl Ray shot the wrong guy back in Memphis. Could have been Jack$son.

    • comdog04

      actually sharpton wasn’t a real protege, he literally just happened to be standing next to king and got his blood on him when shot. that’s it.

  • tagalog

    The list of incidents of black-on-white violence and murder set out above, a list that is by no means complete regarding contemporary incidents, signifies that black people have declared Open Season on white people.

  • Waiting

    One of the saddest aspects of this is illustrated in a comment heard on BBC last evening. While discussing the subject, scenes from a free food place were shown because, according to the report, food stamps just weren’t enough and many Blacks were having to get extra help. The reporter interviewed a lady and she said that, (wishing I could recall her exact words) the troubles for Blacks were because a Black president had been elected and since Whites had given Blacks a president, that was all they were getting. That what is happening now is “payback” for giving them a president. She said some other stuff too, but the part about Whites being attacked by Blacks is “payback” on the part of Whites. She had to have gotten these ideas because of what she heard others say.

    Lies and propaganda ruin so many lives. It all began with the first big lie and continues.

  • bluffcreek1967

    Obama’s a community agitator. It’s what he does best and the only thing he knows . . . Well, that and golf.


    • 8ball

      He sucks at golf too. He doesn’t hit the ball. He scoops it. There is no way he drives it 200 yards.

  • Richard The Common Sense Black

    Um, yeah Arnold, spiraling black on white violence. And the Jews control
    the whole world. Oh please. Get some help dude.

    • Dallas25305

      Why don’t you go and grab a brain you clueless dunce.

  • Richard The Common Sense Black

    Once you folks abandon the crazy, wacky Neoconfederate Conservatism, which
    will always hate black Americans, you will be much better off. Until then, you will

    continue to make fools out of yourselves.

    • ziggy zoggy

      There is nothing foolish about hating scum like you. I would love to see you try to flash mob me.

    • Dallas25305

      Your a typical Black Power racist. Your the one promoting hate. Why don’t you have the guts to say it you racist clown.

  • 88keyman

    My only beef here — stop saying “allegedly” when describing the violent crimes of black thugs. Some things are known to a great enough degree of certainty that it’s almost obscene to inject such doubt where there is none. This isn’t a “report”; it’s an editorial, where you’re free to express your opinion without hedging.

  • Sanford Horn

    An excellent column going into depths beyond the column I wrote. However, I would like to share the link to my column:
    Thank you and an early L’ Shanah Tovah, friends.

  • Anila Abhay

    Most criminal episodes go by different names: Flash mobs, flash robs, black on white crime, or as one social worker put it: Kids just “blowing off steam.” Anything except what they are: Racial violence. “White Girl Bleed a Lot” documents everything.. http://whitegirlbleedalot.com/

  • RLande

    It is ironic that the Democratic party is the party of slavery, segregation, the KKK, and Jim Crow laws. The Democrats filibustered the Civil Rights act signed by presidents Eisenhower (R) and Johnson (D). The Democratic Party now enslaves people by encouraging governmental dependency and a philosophy that people of color cannot raise themselves up but must rely on government to do so (which is a racist philosophy). The Democratic Party supports teachers unions so our public schools are and will remain a disaster- the biggest threat to the Democratic Party are good public schools where students are taught to think independently. Obama, Sharpton, Jackson, and others encourage racial divisiveness in the U. S. Martin Luther King Jr. would be outraged by the state of racial affairs in the country today. King wanted equality of opportunity and harmony- not discrimination against and hatred of whites. In 1911, Booker T. Washington wrote that he was concerned about those who profited from racial divisions and thereby had a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. Many of the civil rights “leaders” of today have gotten rich by promoting the idea that people of color are all victims and need government help. Meanwhile, people of color who promote education and independence and who question the liberal/progressive dogma are called uncle Toms.

    • RLande

      Maybe “outraged” is too strong a word, but I think that King would be very upset.

  • Dallas25305

    As a Canadian who watches what happens in the U.S. I am amazed that anyone is surprised at the black power racism the your supreme ruler Barack Hussein exhibits. He has been telling you all along for anyone with the brains to watch. What other President has added his voice to civil court cases like the Trayvon case. Who by the way was shot because he decided to lay a beating on someone he called a cracker. Obama got involved to start what he knew and wanted to happen, Black gangs attacking and murdering, beating and raping innocent whites. Good luck on getting any civil rights charges with his racist buddy Holder running the show. I knew what he was doing the day he got involved. I used to have many relatives who lived in Detroit, a city that black power racism has destroyed. Now those who have destroyed it and driven anyone productive out sit on their behinds and collect welfare while selling drugs with their Obama phone. Obama’s whole regime has been an attack on white Americans. He couldn’t care less about the 4 white men he abandoned to their death in Libya, he had a campaign fundraiser to attend. He dropped charges against the black panthers for stopping white people from voting in Phillie. He got what he wanted in a number of polling districts in Phillie, Romney got zero votes the next election. Obama stops WW2 White veterans from seeing their monument but allows illegal aliens visit it the next day. He wants to turn the U.S. into a Socialist 3rd world nation with Stalinist style socialist rule. The other part of his plan is to bring as many people from the 3rd world as possible into your country to make whites the minority as soon a possible. He has turned the I.R.S. into little more than the KGB to attack those with the guts to stand against him. He has used the EPA as a weapon to help destroy the U.S. economy because for marxism to grow you must destroy what existed before. Obama’s hero, Saul Alinski once said ” the white middle class must be destroyed”. Is this not what Obama and his henchmen are doing? If Obama can get control of the house he wants to take your gun rights away. He doesn’t want a white man to have a hidden gun on him when he is being attacked by 4 or 5 hood rats. He doesn’t want castle laws where you are able to protect your own home. Why?? What race is the person in the house most likely to be? What race are those invading the home most likely to be. If you know this you know what Obama, Holder, Sharpton and the sellout Liberal Social Democrap party are up to. As a Canadian don’t let this evil man destroy your country, the rest of what is left of the free world needs you.

  • David Gearhart

    Although the black on white crime rate has gone up do to Obama and his racist administration it is not new. The rights of the majority and protection of the law is for the minorities making the majorities second class citizens. Hate crimes, affirmative action and rulings of the majority having to change to the whims of the minority instead of them conforming to society. What Obama is calling social justice we call criminal behavior.