Obama & Clinton’s Benghazi Lies Exposed

clinton-obama630A searing new Interim Progress Report released by the GOP chairmen of five House committees reveals the disturbing extent of the Obama administration’s deceit and manipulation over the Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya. As the 43-page document details, not only was gross incompetence to blame for the success of the attack that cost four Americans their lives, but a concerted effort at the highest levels of government was undertaking to cover up the debacle, deceive the public and shield officials, including then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Obama, from responsibility.

Ranking Democrats on the same five committees, who said they were not included in writing the report, dismissed it as politically motivated. “You are sacrificing accuracy in favor of partisanship,” they said in a letter to House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH).

Hardly. Dividing the timeline into three sections — before, during and after the attack — the report paints a damning picture of the Hillary Clinton-led State Department, which knew “the threat environment in Benghazi was high and that the Benghazi compound was vulnerable and unable to withstand an attack, yet the Department continued to systematically withdraw security personnel.”

The smoking gun revealed in the report — contrary to Hillary Clinton’s congressional testimony that requests for additional security in Benghazi never reached her — was that “an April 2012 State Department cable bearing Secretary Hillary Clinton’s signature acknowledged then-Ambassador Cretz’s formal request for additional security assets but ordered the withdrawal of security elements to proceed as planned.” A Senate report, “Flashing Red: A Special Report on the Terrorist Attack at Benghazi,” released on December 31, confirmed the lack of security, citing “extremely poor security in a threat environment that was ‘flashing red.’”

President Obama was blamed for the lack of security as well, in that he “failed to proactively anticipate the significance of September 11 and provide the Department of Defense with the authority to launch offensive operations beyond self-defense.” The report noted that the Intelligence Community was not to blame for anything, in that they “collected considerable information about the threats in the region, and disseminated regular assessments to senior U.S. officials warning of the deteriorating security environment in Benghazi, which included threats to American interests, facilities, and personnel.”

The 2013 report’s most scathing assessments concern the post-attack response by the Obama administration that “willfully perpetuated a deliberately misleading and incomplete narrative that the attacks evolved from a political demonstration caused by a YouTube video.” The report excoriated the administration’s so-called “talking points,” revealing that

after a White House Deputies Meeting on Saturday, September 15, 2012, the Administration altered the talking points to remove references to the likely participation of Islamic extremists in the attacks… removed references to the threat of extremists linked to al-Qa’ida in Benghazi and eastern Libya, including information about at least five other attacks against foreign interests in Benghazi.

Furthermore, the report states, “Senior State Department officials requested–and the White House approved–that the details of the threats, specifics of the previous attacks, and previous warnings be removed.”

The timeline following the attack reveals a carefully orchestrated disinformation campaign that began with the president, Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice peddling the YouTube video story, even as government emails surfacing six weeks later revealed that both the State Department and the White House were told during the attack that terror group Ansar al-Sharia took credit for it. The video charade continued until September 19, when Matt Olsen, director of the National Counterterrorism Center, became the first administration official to label Benghazi a terrorist attack, even as Obama continued to push the video lie a day later. On September 24, during a taping of “The View,” the president still refused to label Benghazi a terrorist attack. “We’re still doing an investigation,” he said.

As the facts became known, Clinton blamed “the fog of war” for her initial lies, while White House spokesman Jay Carney claimed the White House was giving out the best information it had at the time, but the information had “evolved.”

Other lies by the administration are also forcefully rebutted in the 2013 report, including claims that the talking points were altered to protect classified information of the FBI investigation, noting that the FBI itself  “approved a version of the talking points with significantly more information about the attacks and previous threats than the version that the State Department requested,” and that even “limited due diligence” of an Intelligence Committee (IC) report would have made it clear that “the situation was more complex than the narrative provided by Ambassador Susan Rice and others in the Administration.”

The final post-attack conclusions noted that the administration’s decision to conduct an FBI investigation, as opposed to one by military or other intelligence sources, “contributed to the government’s lack of candor” and “significantly delayed U.S. access to key witnesses and evidence and undermined the government’s ability to bring those responsible for the attacks to justice in a timely manner. ”

That delay was underscored by the reality that 15 days after that attack, it was reported by CNN that the FBI was still waiting to get access to the area. That would be the same CNN that found ambassador Christopher Stevens’ journal on the floor of the unsecured compound — three days after the attack.

Unsurprisingly, the White House pushed back Wednesday, accusing Republicans of creating a political distraction. White House National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden claimed that the report goes over old ground and that some of its conclusions conflict with those reached during an internal investigation conducted by the State Department itself. “The State Department’s Accountability Review Board–the independent body charged with reviewing the attacks and evaluating the interagency response–released its report which specifically found that the interagency response was ‘timely and appropriate’ and ‘helped save the lives of two severely wounded Americans,’ while also making important recommendations to improve security that we are in the process of implementing,” she said.

Hayden is, unfortunately for the Obama administration, misrepresenting reality. The thrust of the State Department’s Accountability Review Board’s report was completely different. “Systemic failures and leadership and management deficiencies at senior levels within two bureaus of the State Department … resulted in a special mission security posture that was inadequate for Benghazi and grossly inadequate to deal with the attack that took place,” it said.

Hillary Clinton supposedly took “full responsibility” for those deficiencies –responsibility best described by Clinton herself in a testy exchange with Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, when he accused her of blaming non-existent protests for the deaths of four Americans. “What difference at this point does it make?” Clinton asked.

Furthermore, the four officials ostensibly terminated because of their mistakes leading up to the attack remained on the State Department payroll. And while spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said Clinton “has accepted [Assistant Secretary of State] Eric Boswell’s decision to resign as assistant secretary for diplomatic security, effective immediately,” she neglected to mention that Boswell gave up only the presidential appointment as assistant secretary, not his other assignments. House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairwoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) illuminated reality. “State Department officials proclaimed …that heads would roll…Now we see that the discipline is a lie and all that has happened is the shuffling of the deck chairs.”

White House spokesman Jay Carney defended Clinton, contending that her signature on the damning cable mentioned above was standard procedure for all diplomatic cables, essentially meaning that any State Department cable has the head of the Department’s signature on it. “In this way, Secretary Clinton and others before her signed hundreds of thousands of cables” as secretary, he said. “Efforts to politicize this have failed in the past and they are not helpful to the broad national security interests we share.” Neither is the fact that Carney is apparently suggesting that Clinton signed something she didn’t read, despite the deadly consequences that occurred as a result.

Regardless, the Republican chairmen weren’t buying it. “An April 19, 2012, cable bearing Secretary Clinton’s signature acknowledged requests for additional security, but nevertheless ordered the withdrawal of security assets to proceed as planned,” they said in a letter to the White House. “Given the gravity of this issue, we request that you immediately make the April 19, 2012, State Department cable public.” So far the White House has not responded.

Despite the stonewalling, House Republicans will press on. On Wednesday, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee announced that the investigation into Benghazi will continue next month. This part of the investigation is likely to become compelling, because it will include testimony from whistleblowers within the administration. “Next month, the Oversight Committee will convene a hearing on the Benghazi terrorist attacks to examine evidence that Obama Administration officials have attempted to suppress information about errors and reckless misjudgments,” said Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA). “The American people still don’t have the full truth about what happened both before and after the murders of four brave Americans.”

Adding fuel to Issa’s fire are the allegations made by former special ops forces that the revelations contained in the current report don’t go far enough, especially regarding why the administration seemingly abandoned its responsibility to protect those who came under attack. “As a former soldier it pains me to think that for hours upon hours and more hours they waited in vain for someone to come to their rescue,” retired Special Forces Col. Jamie Williamson told the Washington Free Beacon. 

Williamson is the cofounder of OPSEC, a non-profit organization that protects US special ops forces and intelligence operatives from “political exploitation and policies, and the misuse of classified information, that unnecessarily exposes them and their families to greater risk and reduces their effectiveness in keeping Americans safe.” The group is asking critical questions that remain unanswered, such as “why were no U.S. military assets immediately deployed in response?” and “why did the commander of Africom tell a member of Congress that he had available assets but was never given order to deploy them?”

In testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee on February 7, then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Army Gen. Martin Dempsey insisted assets could not have reached the scene in time. Yet Panetta and Dempsey were not alerted about the attack until almost an hour after it began, and they didn’t raise the issue with Obama until their previously scheduled 5 p.m meeting, one hour and 18 minutes after the attack began. Moreover, Africom commander Carter Ham told Rep. Jason Chaffetz he was never given the order to secure the consulate in Benghazi. And according to Fox News, neither was a Special Operations team in Sigonella, Italy, despite being only two hours from Benghazi.

OPSEC also illuminated another potential hazard for the administration, claiming that the 20-30 survivors of the attack have been intimidated into remaining silent. “They’re afraid and reasonably so,” said Williamson, who says his group has had direct contact with them. “It appears there has been overt or subtle intimidation and they’re afraid to come forward with their stories.”

A March 1 letter sent to Secretary of State John Kerry by Reps. Frank Wolf (R-VA) and Jim Gerlach (R-PA) demanded the names and contact information for “as many as 30” Americans that were injured in the attack “so that we can make appropriate arrangements.”

OPSEC and other like-minded organizations are calling for a Watergate-like select committee to investigate. Rep. Wolf has been the primary advocate for such a committee, and has garnered the support of 120 lawmakers who believe that such a committee, which would have the power to issue subpoenas compelling key officials to testify, is vitally necessary.

Four dead Americans, 20-30 survivors, and every other American frustrated with the media-abetted lying perpetrated by the Obama administration deserve nothing less. Those on the left who deride the effort to get to the bottom of this scandal have certainly demanded much more for far less serious transgressions. That they would reject the same effort here reveals a level of ideological bankruptcy and hypocrisy that is nothing short of appalling.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • truebearing

    The amount of treachery Obama and Hillary are desparately trying to obscure is directly proportionate to the efforts they have put forth to keep the truth hidden. I believe both know that what they secretly did is, dare I say, an impeachable moment.

    Everything that Hillary and Obama did, or didn't do — both before and during the attack that killed Stevens and the 3 other Americans — was a perfect plan for hanging someone out to dry. For whatever reason, Stevens may well have been seen as a threat to their retaining power. Obviously, Obama wanted to get reelected. Hillary wants to win in 2016. So what did Stevens know that initiated this treacherous abandonment of an ambassador? Shakespeare would love this Macbethian plot.

    • Richard Wagener

      I do not trust anything Obama and his bunch put out. He has an unbroken track record of lying through his teeth and always puts his personal gain above the good of the Country.

    • RebeccaPonder

      Obama was going to have Stevens kidnapped in order to exchange him for the Blind Shiek. He would have looked like a hero for saving Stevens, and would have like his terrorist friends have a very important leader back. When the two seals that didn't stand down started killing them, they thought Obama had betrayed them and tortured and raped Stevens for 5 hours. This is why Obama didn't do anything to save them. Those are HIS buddies, he can't betray them. That's also why he never gives any kind of ANYTHING to American soldiers..he can't stand any of us. This is all coming out. Watch Glenn Beck. He broke this story in the first place..risking everything he has. His news is NOT funded by the government, but ALL the others are. If they are told not to report something, they don't or they will lose money.

  • http://www.adinakutnicki.com AdinaK

    Lies and more lies…cover ups galore – http://adinakutnicki.com/2013/04/08/benghazigates

    Guilty as charged!

    Adina Kutnicki, Israel http://adinakutnicki.com/about/

  • charlotte

    Hillary perjured herself twice:
    1. She Didn’t See or Approve Cables Requesting Support In Libya

    But a new congressional report shows that Clinton did indeed sign an April, 2012 State Department cable acknowledging formal requests for help. So, she DID know of various cables requesting assistance in Libya. Reporter @SharylAtkisson tweeted that while Clinton knew of these requests for aid, she “ordered the withdrawal of elements to proceed as planned.” Worse yet, the report indicates that Obama’s White House and State Department literally changed their talking points in order to cover for Clinton. Specifically: “…. to remove references to likely participation of Islamic extremists in attacks, references to threat of extremists linked to al Qaeda…,” according to the report.

    2. She ‘Did Not Know’ About Gun Trafficking That Armed al-Qaida
    WND reports that the gun-tracking “escalate[d] before the Sept. 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. facilities in Benghazi” and that Sen. Lindsay Graham has testified that Stevens’ role was to “keep weapons caches from falling into the hands of the enemies.”

    So Clinton most likely launched the gun program, expected Stevens to oversee it and then her weapons likely landed in the hands of al-Qaida affiliates who killed Stevens and three other Americans. And she is denying any knowledge of this program.

  • el cuco

    IMPEACH OBAMA.

    • Dallas

      IMPEACH OBAMA!!

    • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLNn2YflwNs Roger

      That would require leadership on Boehner's part.

      I don't expect it's possible or likely Boehner could even pretend to be a leader.

  • Cassandra

    That's right .impeach Obama and Clinton. SHE signs diplomatic cables and she does not READ them? Unbelievable. She approves of sending weapons to Syrian rebels and when things go wrong and Al Qaeda gets them she lets her people get killed instead of helping them. ?Both her and Obama should be considered criminals in this matter, tried and sent to jail.

    • DeeDee

      Sorry, Casandra, we need to find someone in our government honest enough to impeach these folks…ain't gonna happen. Except for a select few, they all appear to be turning into whores (male); thieves, and big time liars only out to fatten their own pockets. They are beginning to believe they are better than anyone else and actually "know it all". What else are we to think when they continually make new laws and never have them enforced.

    • DeeDee

      Sorry, Cassandra, you gotta find someone honest enough to impeach these folks!

    • Arlene coleman

      If the real truth comes out about this operation, handcuffs will be in order. http://www.homelandsecurityus.com chocked full of information, started following this site Oct. 2012, they had reported things well b4 the media, and was right on all info in their reports. If u do go on the site go to where they first started their reporting, that is what made a believer out of me.

    • Brad

      Darn right! I am ashamed of what politicians will say and do. If mistakes
      Were made or overseen than own up to them and relay the issues
      At hand to the American people. Mistakes can be made. However
      This was no mistake and one big cover up by our leaders. I'm disgusted
      And feel Clinton, Obama and any others involved should be fully
      Prosecuted and jailed. Justice will be done wether here on earth or
      In the afterlife. I prefer lock these scumbags up asap!!!!

  • Softly Bob

    Impeach Obama immediately

    • NAHALKIDES

      Unfortunately, there's no point in impeaching Obama because no matter what he's done, Senate Democrats will vote to acquit him. We gain nothing from such a trial. The correct procedure is to continue to hold committee hearings, perhaps with a select committee to investigate the cover-up. We need the public testimony of Gen. Ham and those who have been kept hidden by the administration.

      A public hearing which finally exposes the facts of Benghasi could cripple Obama's Presidency, an enormous boon to the country in itself – much better than an impeachment which would go nowhere.

      • Maxie

        Your idea to continue with committee hearings is good except for the fact that the criminally corrupt MSM will ignore it all. No TV coverage and what print coverage they give will be in the nature of fawning defense of these two losers and non-stop villification of the GOP for participating. The GOP knows this only too well so any hearings will be perfunctory with no intent to go beyond embarrassing the 'Crats — as if that's even possible. The precedent for such a sham event was set by the faux Senate impeachement trial of Bill Clinton. Little evidence was presented 'live' to the assembled Senate — it was all just 'made available' to observe voluntarily which virtually no one did. Few witnesses were called for testimony. The GOP just "punted" for fear of Media backlash.and the damage it might do the party in the then-upcoming (FY 2000) Congressional election. The same circumstances exist in the current situation. Some sort of "censure" is the worst that might possibly befall these two incompetents. This GOP political cowardice is par for the course and is a big reason why America is going down the B0l$hevik drain.

  • Beth

    "….and shield officials, including then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and President Obama, from responsibility."

    Hillary (along with that wesley clarke) was very much a part of attacking Yugoslavia (no longer a nation) – Serbians – who were fighting back against muslims who were attacking them. The media refused to report the truth at that time (nothing new). Yugoslavia did not do anything that should have provoked an attack from the U.S.. I believe the Serbs should sue Hillary (and company) – personally.

    • thomas_h

      I believe the Serbs should sue Hillary (and company) – personally.</l>

      And so do I. Absolutely!
      The problem is where will they find the court willing to take their case.

  • Fred

    Nothing will be done as the enemy have taken over the govt., courts, media and education. Republicans and Democrats are together but put on a good show. Goodby America.

    Ask Orly Taitz. Our courts are really corrupted or threatened.

    • Looking4Sanity

      There is no doubt that we are in dire straits.

    • Bert

      Obama and his supporters in congress and the media are criminal, brazen and treasonous. The critical question now is whether there is enough honesty and courage remaining in this country to hold all these criminals to account. So for I fear that Obama and his dirty gang may yet prevail and then woe to America.

      • Maxie

        It all depends on the GOP and history tells us, sadly, that it will go limp and do nothing. Impeachment? Not a chance. The MarxStreamMinistryofPropaganda will crucify the GOP on an hourly basis until the whole Benghazigate affair becomes the Republicans fault. All this just in time to torpedo the GOP's chances to gain Congressional seats in 2014. I've seen this happen too many times in the past. The most recent was the Clinton impeachment "trial" which was aborted for fear that Media-generated "blowback" would hurt the GOP's fortunes in the up-coming 2000 election. You can, and should, 'look it up".

  • RAS

    America's great 250 year run is about to end at the "Great Abyss of Dead Empires." As with the others the end was the result of internal corruption. God and Judea-Christian morality are gone replaced by deceit, greed, lies, lust, and death. Having grown up during the greatest generation, it is hard for me to watch the curtain fall. We had a final chance to switch tracks, but selfish stupid greed and lazy apathy prevailed; the abyss is just ahead.

    • DeeDee

      well put, RAS.

  • winston7

    Constitution Article III Section 3 delineates treason as follows:_Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court._ The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted._ However, Congress has, at times, passed statutes creating related offenses that punish conduct which undermines the government or the national security, such as sedition in the 1798 Alien and Sedition Acts, or espionage and sedition in the 1917 Espionage Act, which do not require the testimony of two witnesses and have a much broader definition than Article Three treason. For example, some well-known spies have been convicted of espionage rather than treason._ The Constitution does not itself create the offense

    • gee59

      Funding terrorists that murder Americans qualifies then. The US is funding the PLO and Hamas – both of whom have murdered US diplomats, and other Americans. Al Quida – only other Americans.

      So the charges of treason by President and the former Secretary of State would in fact fit the facts

  • Elliott Alhadeff

    … Therefore, …. No matter what comes from any investigation – NOTHING – I say again – NOTHING result in anyone being held accountable – i.e., as in the private sector, either being demoted, fired and/or facing criminal charges and/or civil complaints.
    THE PEOPLE ARE IMPOTENT!!!
    We're still waiting for something to happen to someone in the "Fast and Furious" debacle.
    No one is charged with election law fraud
    No one is charged with Solindra corruption or incompetence
    No one is charged with Keystone pipeline corruption or incompetence
    SOLUTION!!! Give any citizen a cause of action against any public official for malfeasance or misfeasance in office – and let the trial lawyers' get paid by the government to represent his claim. Corruption solved!!!

  • impeach

    itthe

  • labillyboy

    Just more of the sheer incompetence of the Obama Administration, filled with academics who are driven by far left ideologies with zero real world experience. The complete lack of any moderating viewpoints and practical experience will continue to lead to more failures. Even Clinton has no real world context, unless you count her Rose law firm days where she likely broke the law in several matter she was involved in. Ironic that her husband also was convicted of lying under oath, she hasn't been yet, but if the Republicans do well in 2014 she is toast. All this means the Demokrats will pull all the stops in the next election, better get ready.

    • gee59

      I do not believe that the Administration is incompetent – they are succeeding in what they have announced that they want to accomplish. This is far scarier than mere incompetence.

  • Knucklehead

    This is outrageous, but not surprising. This administration is the most corrupt, secretive and dishonest in the history of the country.

    Richard Nixon was forced to resign from office over his coverup of the Watergate scandal.
    This president is guilty of the coverup of the Bengazhi scandal.
    The only difference is that nobody died from Watergate.

  • marios

    where is American "Margaret Thatcher"?
    If Obama & Co were just incompetent it would be half of problem but if judge him and Dem's party establishment by their deeds/actions it is TREASON!

    • Rich

      American Maggy Thatcher is dead. His name was Ronald Reagan

  • jerome

    if a republican was president impeachment would have been swift and damning -the left shills would have been in full action mode , but because it a democrat in the form of rock star barack obama , nothing will occur and the press will downplay it as usual.
    pretty sad that this fatal blindness has overtaken common sense in the west.

  • http://www.appsta.com/toolboxes/mac-starter-kit-essential-apps-for-your-mac Mac starter kit

    Thakns

  • BLJ

    These two should be wearing matching orange jumpsuits for this. I hate both of their guts.

    • bill

      no, it should be ten first, Hillary, Obama, Eric the Red Holder, V. Jarrett, Napolitano, Axlerod, Bill ayres and his scumbag bag of crap wife, Van Jones, Kass Sunstein, and the rest of the collective Marxist whore murderers.

  • geoffreybritain

    If Congress can't even pass a 'contempt of congress' resolution and with the MSM covering up the deceit, nothing will come of this. A slim majority of the American public is being led by the nose and either don't even know it or could care less. They don't want to know the truth because they can't handle the truth.

  • BILL

    this is all fine AND GOOD, BUT WHO IS GOING TO JAIL HERE, I WANT TO SEE THESE PEOPLE HANDCUFFED IN DISGRACED AND SENT TO A FEDERAL PRISON FOR THEIR MURDERS.

  • pierce

    And Hilary wants to run for President in 2016. Does any one think she can outlive this debacle.
    Well maybe some of our citizens, the ones that can't read, and have no TVs, and don''t care what is going on will vote for her. And even funnier is the fact that they are the same ones who voted for O'Bummer last November. And our MSM will have forgotten about this by then, intensionally.

    • Horace

      You betcha. She will be "elected" no problem (low information voters). The electorate is just not aware of the facts, since the Saudi buyout media is out to lunch (the circumcised units of Islam's finest)

  • harridan

    i want to know…. what does the chicago/obama machine have on all of these seemingly reasonable people… at least the people who we thought we knew to be rational, reasonable, and represent OUR best interests??

  • Ellman

    "That they would reject the same effort here reveals a level of ideological bankruptcy and hypocrisy that is nothing short of appalling."

    This characterization of the Left has been true for many decades and will continue to be true for many more. The relevant question to ask is 'What are we going to do about it?' The answer, as always, is NOTHING! We don't have George Soros, the mainstream media, academia and Hollywood on our side so the Left will continue to lie, distort, fabricate, control the dialogue, etc., complaints to the contrary notwithstanding. We're losing the war folks and the Left is winning it.

  • blkbart

    Blah, Blah, Blah. They lie that ass off EVERY time. More coming down the line.

  • Alvaro

    Thanks for writiing this. Very informative and high quality.

  • CurmudgyOneJr

    Congress is powerless because it's spinless. Obama and his gang aren't afraid of it because they are imperialists, they are in power, and they have the media on their side. It is the media that is the real problem; with their support, Obama would not be coddled as he is.

  • michael netz

    Their is no justice none at all

  • Bimbam

    This is getting trite already.

    Look, we all know liberals lie, cheat and are deceitful. That is well-known. What we need to do is DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. THE CORRECT THING! Not vote them in office over and over and over. And even reward them with the highest powers we can laud on someone so ungrateful and a menace to America.

    I would like to see the next title; Barry Saetoro and Hillary Clinton impeached and indicted for war crimes and murder. Trial to start immediately.

  • Bimbam

    Well, when are you going to do something about it? As I said before you deleted my previous comment this is a trite matter already.

    We need to do something about it. Sick of the lame talk. I want to see; Barry Saetoro an Hillary indicted on murder charges!

  • burkasrugly

    Only God – the REAL God – Not Allah can save us now. I am very saddened to see our great country led by liars, communists, Marxists, etc, etc. I can't stand to even HEAR Obama or much less see him on tv. I have to change the channel because I KNOW and many other Americans KNOW he is a LIAR and FRAUD. The thing that hurts, more, though, is that idiotic Americans voted for him. I am upset and frustrated that American people are SOOOOO STUPID!!! If Obama beheaded a baby on live tv, there would be people – mostly liberals – who would shrug their shoulders and say the baby 'must have deserved it.' This is how far our morality has fallen.

  • Rich

    Damn good article. Learned a few new things about the event. it confirmed something we've all known a long time: Obama is a total coward. Typical of elitists.

  • R.Young

    The Government (REGIME) will always thell their SUBJECTS the TRUTH. If the Former Secretary of State did not know what was happening then she may be speaking the truth for who is really to say that the Regime did not withold information from her. I am not standing up for the Regime here. If the Regime wants someone to know something no matter how High Up in the Regime they are, then they will tell them, if not then of course they will not!
    The Great Blck Father and the Regime from day one have always told the Truth, the whole Truth and nothing but the TRUTH. It is their version of the TRUTH!

  • SodiumPen

    As soon as the hearings start you can count on the well-worn "race card" to be dealt. .

  • Horace

    The bottom line of all of these Democrat party flubs/boondoggles/treasonous aids to the enemy is simply that these morons or Saudi buyouts (like Bush ) think that Islam is good, (religion of peace) and can do no wrong. Obama says that his job as president is to prevent negative stereotypes of Islam. He is trying his damnedest. It's obvious that Obama's effect on the Islamic Jihad is one of assistance rather than obstruction or prevention. I doubt that his drone strikes actually kill any Jihadis of value. Anwar Awlaki is probably hooting it up in Dubai with 72 clap infested "virgins" The pictures of Awlaki's corpse are just as numerous as Osama Bin Laden's (0). Bemocrats just loved Awlaki- see the schmooze the Imam piece at Huffpo- http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-shaw/anwar-

  • spark777

    Charlotte. you think Kimberly`s blurb is terrific… last week I bought a new volvo when I got my cheque for $9234 this-last/month an would you believe ten thousand this past month. this is really the coolest work Ive ever had. I actually started 9-months ago and almost straight away began to bring in more than $76… per-hour. I work through this website, kep2.com

  • Danny C

    This is an informative article and an enraging one. The last paragraph says it all.

  • Stephen5970

    At either 4 AM or 5 AM EDT the day of the attack I was watching the BBC news. The taped report had a reporter was being shown around by the terrorist in charge and shown where the RPGs, machine guns, and attackers would be when the attack came. A few hours later on all news channels I was hearing about the Benghazi attack. Where did that report original BBC report disappear to? Talk about a smoking gun!

    Since my news sources aren’t always US network news, I was watching reports from all over the world, so I was pretty much shocked by the White House response.

    That same day I heard reports that a rapid response group (I believe in Crete or Italy) had offered to go in. Three times it was told to stand down. Where did that tidbit vanish to? Oh yes, and since the attack was being monitored by a live feed video from a drone to the White House and the Pentagon, how could ANYONE suggest that it was a riot or that they didn’t know exactly what was going on?

  • george

    time to start impeachment procedure's .

  • Willy Rho

    20. Why did the plan stick with the plan's excuse of the Sham "Mohammed is an Idiot" Movie Trailer?
    21. Why did the Ansar al-Sharia try to save Ambassador Stevens by taking him to a Hospital/Emergency Room?
    22. Why did Ansar al-Sharia surround the Hospital where Ambassador Steven's body was taken and not let anyone in or out?
    23. Why was a Libyan Military person photographing the Consulate before the Attack?
    24. Why could the President not get an interview with a participating Terrorist for weeks when Senator Lindsey Graham got Tunisia to permit the FBI interview him within 24 hours of the request?
    25. Why was the Terrorist that was held by Tunisia never interviewed by the FBI or the CIA.
    26. Why was the Terrorist in Tunisia released and got totally Free without the USA stopping his release or questioning him?
    27. Why were Senior counter terrorism personnel cut out of the Loop, the Foreign Emergency Security Team was not called?
    28. The Embassy in Egypt was attacked by a Mob Action and the motive was the Film Trailer. This was part of the Plan and does not make sense, except if it was a part of the Kidnapping Plan with the joint actions in Egypt and Benghazi?
    29. Why did the Idiots in the White House stick with the Planned Motive of the Film Trailer, claiming that it started the attack?
    30. What are the Names of the 25 people saved by the Navy Seals?
    31. Where are the Sworn Statements, describing the details of the attack, made by the 25 witnesses who were saved by the Seals?
    32. The President seems to have not been around, physically or mentally, not even knowing what happened at Benghazi, or he was stoned on his favorite candy, Crack Cocaine.
    33. Larry Sinclair says Barack Obama is a Crack Addict. Check out Sinclair's You Tube Video in which he claims he has hard evidence of his two Homosexual Trysts with Obama and Drugs. Or just buy Larry Sinclair's book he wrote about Obama and his sexual Trysts, dealing Cocaine and Murders.
    It is named: "Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & murder". The Amazon online book store has it: use this web URL: http://www.amazon.com/Barack-Obama-Larry-Sinclair
    34. The Fly in Obama's Treasonous Plans; Two Brave American Heroes, Navy Seals. They should both receive, posthumously, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, after Obama's Conviction for: High Crimes, Misdemeanors, Murders and High Treason.
    BOTH OR EITHER OF THESE PLANS AND ACTIONS ARE ABSOLUTELY TREASON. Barack Obama is guilty of High Treason and Murder and should be IMPEACHED NOW.

  • Willy Rho

    .I sent this to my Senators and Rep, but they are complicit in the Illegal Aliens Muslim Communist's Coup d'etat. So, I don't expect anything to come of this except more Cool Aid Drinking by the Masses and Leaders.
    Quoting retired Four-Star Admiral James Lyons, writes: “[T]he attack on the American Consulate in Benghazi… was the result of a bungled abduction attempt….the first stage of an international prisoner exchange… [that] would have ensured the release of Omar Abdel Rahman, the ‘Blind Sheik’…”
    <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.
    Was Obama's SECRET PLANS to: RUN GUNS AND MISSILES TO AL QAEDA and TRADE THE BLIND SHEIK FOR AMBASSADOR STEVENS, after ENABLING his KIDNAPPING.
    The Mob Action, introduced in Egypt and other embassies and its claimed cause was to be an Anti Muslim movie trailer. That was the planned cover for the Kidnapping in Benghazi. The action at Benghazi was supposed to be blamed on the same mob action as in Egypt.
    Question: Does anything done by "Any Actor" make any sense, except in the context of "The Secret Plans"?
    A few questions that can be completely explained by the "Secret Plans".
    1. Why did Amb Stevens have dinner with the Turkish General Council?
    2. Why did the terrorist attack on the Consulate begin immediately after the Turkish General Council left?
    3. What happened to the 15,000 SA-7 Grail/Strela-2 missiles that Muammar Qaddafi had acquired and the USA Stinger missiles provided by Barack Obama to overthrow Qaddafi?
    4. Was Amb Stevens running guns and missiles to the Al Qaeda in Syria through Turkey?
    5. Because Al Qaeda has been at war with the USA, openly attacking the USA for about 20 years, since 1993; would Running Guns and Missiles and other War Material to Al Qaeda be Treason?
    6. Did Obama want to release the Blind Sheik, but had no justifiable reason to do so?
    7. Why were 3 MST and 1 SST security details removed from Libya?
    8. Why did Hillary request/demand more security, but Obama denied more security, several times?
    9. Why were ex-Seals, Doherty and Woods, told to stand down 3 times?
    10. Why did Obama tell the CIA to NOT help defend the Consulate?
    11. Why did Obama and his minions watch live video of the attack and not act?
    12. Why was an American Drone flying over the consulate recording video BEFORE the attack began?
    13. Predator Drones carry Hell Fire Missiles, why were none fired?
    14. Why were the Seals Lazing a Target, giving away their position and no Hell Fire missiles were fired?
    15. Why did Obama blame it on a video that no one (only 17 views on YouTube) had ever seen?
    16. Why did Obama fire General Ham for moving to assist the Consulate?
    17. Why was an AC-130 Gunship, 90 minutes away, not sent to aid the Consulate?
    18. Why were the F-16's only 20 minutes away not sent to help the consulate?
    19. Was the reason that the Aircraft were not sent, because Obama was afraid that USA A/C would be shot down with the anti-Aircraft missiles (Stingers) that Obama supplied to the Terrorists?

  • Willy Rho

    20. Why did the plan stick with the plan's excuse of the Sham "Mohammed is an Idiot" Movie Trailer?
    21. Why did the Ansar al-Sharia try to save Ambassador Stevens by taking him to a Hospital/Emergency Room?
    22. Why did Ansar al-Sharia surround the Hospital where Ambassador Steven's body was taken and not let anyone in or out?
    23. Why was a Libyan Military person photographing the Consulate before the Attack?
    24. Why could the President not get an interview with a participating Terrorist for weeks when Senator Lindsey Graham got Tunisia to permit the FBI interview him within 24 hours of the request?
    25. Why was the Terrorist that was held by Tunisia never interviewed by the FBI or the CIA.
    26. Why was the Terrorist in Tunisia released and got totally Free without the USA stopping his release or questioning him?
    27. Why were Senior counter terrorism personnel cut out of the Loop, the Foreign Emergency Security Team was not called?
    28. The Embassy in Egypt was attacked by a Mob Action and the motive was the Film Trailer. This was part of the Plan and does not make sense, except if it was a part of the Kidnapping Plan with the joint actions in Egypt and Benghazi?
    29. Why did the Idiots in the White House stick with the Planned Motive of the Film Trailer, claiming that it started the attack?
    30. What are the Names of the 25 people saved by the Navy Seals?
    31. Where are the Sworn Statements, describing the details of the attack, made by the 25 witnesses who were saved by the Seals?
    32. The President seems to have not been around, physically or mentally, not even knowing what happened at Benghazi, or he was stoned on his favorite candy, Crack Cocaine.
    33. Larry Sinclair says Barack Obama is a Crack Addict. Check out Sinclair's You Tube Video in which he claims he has hard evidence of his two Homosexual Trysts with Obama and Drugs. Or just buy Larry Sinclair's book he wrote about Obama and his sexual Trysts, dealing Cocaine and Murders.
    It is named: "Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & murder". The Amazon online book store has it: use this web URL: http://www.amazon.com/Barack-Obama-Larry-Sinclair
    34. The Fly in Obama's Treasonous Plans; Two Brave American Heroes, Navy Seals. They should both receive, posthumously, the Presidential Medal of Freedom, after Obama's Conviction for: High Crimes, Misdemeanors, Murders and High Treason.
    BOTH OR EITHER OF THESE PLANS AND ACTIONS ARE ABSOLUTELY TREASON. Barack Obama is guilty of High Treason and Murder and should be IMPEACHED NOW.

  • Joe

    Disgusting scumbags !

  • Bill

    This is typical Chicago corruption and politics. A third grade moron, who actually can think clearly for a moment, should be able to smell the junk coming out of this administration. This is really no surprise considering the then upcoming election and the knowledge that Clinton was leaving and the speculation of her run for 16, When will the mainstream(lamestream?) media and democrats see thru these crooks. We need to get all professional politicians out of OUR government.

  • Mike

    It's pretty simple. The bimbo and the closet Muslim lied and then lied about lying. Next topic…

  • g

    Obama needs to be forced to face the American people on open television and admit his wrongdoings and should resign as President of these United States.