<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s MSNBC Whore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obamas-msnbc-whore</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 00:05:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc2Go</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doc2Go]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 07:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ezzzactally.


-Doc]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ezzzactally.</p>
<p>-Doc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 04:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure, I agree with that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, I agree with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516398</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 04:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My point is that whether or not I believe it can be attributed to incompetence or malice that it is beyond question; unacceptable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is that whether or not I believe it can be attributed to incompetence or malice that it is beyond question; unacceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516397</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 04:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I frequently see comments to various articles closed and the comments hidden when the discourse becomes unacceptable to those maintaining the site. Sometimes this fact is announced, and sometimes it is not.&quot;

So you&#039;re talking about global web experience and I thought you were talking about Horowitz related sites. 

&quot;So, no, I don&#039;t find the idea delusional. I think there are likelier explanations - I certainly ascribe to the aphorism &quot;never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity&quot; - but that&#039;s hardly a basis for slinging accusations of mental illness or incapacity.&quot;



Everyone must check their ideas against the possibility of delusion. Suggesting that someone is being inappropriately imaginative is not necessarily suggesting that they have some kind of chronic or serious problem. Unless of course the behavior IS chronic and or severe enough to require  intervention.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I frequently see comments to various articles closed and the comments hidden when the discourse becomes unacceptable to those maintaining the site. Sometimes this fact is announced, and sometimes it is not.&#8221;</p>
<p>So you&#8217;re talking about global web experience and I thought you were talking about Horowitz related sites. </p>
<p>&#8220;So, no, I don&#8217;t find the idea delusional. I think there are likelier explanations &#8211; I certainly ascribe to the aphorism &#8220;never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity&#8221; &#8211; but that&#8217;s hardly a basis for slinging accusations of mental illness or incapacity.&#8221;</p>
<p>Everyone must check their ideas against the possibility of delusion. Suggesting that someone is being inappropriately imaginative is not necessarily suggesting that they have some kind of chronic or serious problem. Unless of course the behavior IS chronic and or severe enough to require  intervention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 03:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516388</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 03:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I frequently see comments to various articles closed and the comments hidden when the discourse becomes unacceptable to those maintaining the site.  Sometimes this fact is announced, and sometimes it is not.   

So, no, I don&#039;t find the idea delusional.  I think there are likelier explanations - I certainly ascribe to the aphorism &quot;never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity&quot; - but that&#039;s hardly a basis for slinging accusations of mental illness or incapacity.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I frequently see comments to various articles closed and the comments hidden when the discourse becomes unacceptable to those maintaining the site.  Sometimes this fact is announced, and sometimes it is not.   </p>
<p>So, no, I don&#8217;t find the idea delusional.  I think there are likelier explanations &#8211; I certainly ascribe to the aphorism &#8220;never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity&#8221; &#8211; but that&#8217;s hardly a basis for slinging accusations of mental illness or incapacity.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 03:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;So maybe they really are that incompetent at the IRS? That&#039;s scary. Incompetent? Yes. Acting in bad faith in very serious matters? Yes.&quot;

Sure.  I have a bit of trouble buying the idea of that level of incompetence, but then, I have not worked in a non-military government bureaucracy.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So maybe they really are that incompetent at the IRS? That&#8217;s scary. Incompetent? Yes. Acting in bad faith in very serious matters? Yes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure.  I have a bit of trouble buying the idea of that level of incompetence, but then, I have not worked in a non-military government bureaucracy.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516378</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 02:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I read so far is that you think it&#039;s (paraphrasing you) &quot;interesting&quot; or &quot;noteworthy&quot; that the comments disappeared, you have no direct comments on your comrade&#039;s paranoia, and you think it&#039;s &quot;suspicious&quot; that the IRS lied and defied court orders to produce evidence for Congressional investigators.


So maybe they really are that incompetent at the IRS? That&#039;s scary. Incompetent? Yes. Acting in bad faith in very serious matters? Yes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I read so far is that you think it&#8217;s (paraphrasing you) &#8220;interesting&#8221; or &#8220;noteworthy&#8221; that the comments disappeared, you have no direct comments on your comrade&#8217;s paranoia, and you think it&#8217;s &#8220;suspicious&#8221; that the IRS lied and defied court orders to produce evidence for Congressional investigators.</p>
<p>So maybe they really are that incompetent at the IRS? That&#8217;s scary. Incompetent? Yes. Acting in bad faith in very serious matters? Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516374</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 02:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that it is delusional to think that an entire page&#039;s comments are going to be wiped out to preserve a narrative and protect it from dissent given how much dissent is already tolerated and how few comments are actually removed - usually for promoting libels via spam rather than actually challenging a given narrative in conversation (constructive or not). 


You disagree? Whatever.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it is delusional to think that an entire page&#8217;s comments are going to be wiped out to preserve a narrative and protect it from dissent given how much dissent is already tolerated and how few comments are actually removed &#8211; usually for promoting libels via spam rather than actually challenging a given narrative in conversation (constructive or not). </p>
<p>You disagree? Whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516373</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 02:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m just teasing about the comments and possibly you missed some of my references. I don&#039;t really care.


I care a ~little about what you have to say about the IRS investigation. Do any of your references attempt to paint me as paranoid or overly suspicious, as a &quot;conspiracy theorist,&quot; because of what I&#039;ve said about the IRS and the &quot;lost emails?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just teasing about the comments and possibly you missed some of my references. I don&#8217;t really care.</p>
<p>I care a ~little about what you have to say about the IRS investigation. Do any of your references attempt to paint me as paranoid or overly suspicious, as a &#8220;conspiracy theorist,&#8221; because of what I&#8217;ve said about the IRS and the &#8220;lost emails?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516371</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 02:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Try reading my posts.  I&#039;m implying that it&#039;s puzzling and a bit frustrating.  I explicitly offered some possible non-nefarious explanations, which should serve to answer your question.

You asked a direct question about the IRS scandal, and got a direct answer about the IRS scandal in response.  It must have taken some active effort to achieve your confusion.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try reading my posts.  I&#8217;m implying that it&#8217;s puzzling and a bit frustrating.  I explicitly offered some possible non-nefarious explanations, which should serve to answer your question.</p>
<p>You asked a direct question about the IRS scandal, and got a direct answer about the IRS scandal in response.  It must have taken some active effort to achieve your confusion.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516353</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2014 01:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I&#039;m confused then. Are you not implying something at least a little nefarious about the lost comments?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;m confused then. Are you not implying something at least a little nefarious about the lost comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516314</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You asked a question.  I answered it.  Then you apparently forgot what question you asked.  Glance up the page and refresh that memory of yours, and you&#039;ll understand that &quot;suspicious&quot; referred to the IRS hard drive explanation.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You asked a question.  I answered it.  Then you apparently forgot what question you asked.  Glance up the page and refresh that memory of yours, and you&#8217;ll understand that &#8220;suspicious&#8221; referred to the IRS hard drive explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516310</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 23:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The entire page lost its discussion. Why would that be suspicious? That could be a single corrupt process. IOW, it&#039;s not &quot;vanished&quot; but just not placed correctly for you to find it. It exists. It&#039;s just not worth it to build systems that are completely free from errors.  Of course what you suggest is plausible, but that doesn&#039;t make it likely. It seems like an irrational degree of pessimism.


They&#039;re not shy about removing comments. They&#039;re also OK leaving stupid comments.  The systems are more complicated than you can appreciate and they&#039;re designed to be relatively cheap and easy to operate. I got &quot;moderated&quot; yesterday talking to the Marxist dupe that&#039;s trying to sell me talking points and theories that only exist in the mind without understanding the underlying realities. But I got moderated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The entire page lost its discussion. Why would that be suspicious? That could be a single corrupt process. IOW, it&#8217;s not &#8220;vanished&#8221; but just not placed correctly for you to find it. It exists. It&#8217;s just not worth it to build systems that are completely free from errors.  Of course what you suggest is plausible, but that doesn&#8217;t make it likely. It seems like an irrational degree of pessimism.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re not shy about removing comments. They&#8217;re also OK leaving stupid comments.  The systems are more complicated than you can appreciate and they&#8217;re designed to be relatively cheap and easy to operate. I got &#8220;moderated&#8221; yesterday talking to the Marxist dupe that&#8217;s trying to sell me talking points and theories that only exist in the mind without understanding the underlying realities. But I got moderated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d say the same thing I did the last time I was asked that question:  seems pretty suspicious to me, and merits further investigation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say the same thing I did the last time I was asked that question:  seems pretty suspicious to me, and merits further investigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Americana</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Americana]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 07:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, but that&#039;s where you&#039;re completely off the charts wacko. I&#039;m not **SPAMMING** and my comments are NOT to be summarily discounted simply because I&#039;m not agreeing w/the majority of readers. To claim that having a dissenting viewpoint is spamming is wrong in every sense. It shows you&#039;re determined to reduce free speech. It&#039;s an attempt to reduce the amount of analysis that&#039;s applied to an issue. Shall I go on w/how wrong your charges are and why they&#039;d reduce the nature of the conversation? Negative hits, you outta get thousands of negative hits for such foolishness as you&#039;ve just outlined here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, but that&#8217;s where you&#8217;re completely off the charts wacko. I&#8217;m not **SPAMMING** and my comments are NOT to be summarily discounted simply because I&#8217;m not agreeing w/the majority of readers. To claim that having a dissenting viewpoint is spamming is wrong in every sense. It shows you&#8217;re determined to reduce free speech. It&#8217;s an attempt to reduce the amount of analysis that&#8217;s applied to an issue. Shall I go on w/how wrong your charges are and why they&#8217;d reduce the nature of the conversation? Negative hits, you outta get thousands of negative hits for such foolishness as you&#8217;ve just outlined here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516094</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 05:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By the way, it&#039;s a lot more common to &quot;lose&quot; an aging directory entry from a massive live  database than it is to &quot;lose&quot; a set of backup tapes that have a separate physical copy for each business day over the scope of the period in question.


Just saying.


How do you &quot;lose&quot; something like 500 of these and then come up with &quot;the hard drive crashed?&quot;


http://static.cddimensions.Com/catalog/category/4_MM_backup_tape.jpg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, it&#8217;s a lot more common to &#8220;lose&#8221; an aging directory entry from a massive live  database than it is to &#8220;lose&#8221; a set of backup tapes that have a separate physical copy for each business day over the scope of the period in question.</p>
<p>Just saying.</p>
<p>How do you &#8220;lose&#8221; something like 500 of these and then come up with &#8220;the hard drive crashed?&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://static.cddimensions.Com/catalog/category/4_MM_backup_tape.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://static.cddimensions.Com/catalog/category/4_MM_backup_tape.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516087</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 05:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a little paranoid to pivot immediately to paranoid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a little paranoid to pivot immediately to paranoid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiernonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516086</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hiernonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 05:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Paranoia can reasonably be described as &quot;thinking the worst.&quot;&quot;



If you can show that it is delusional or irrational, perhaps.  Absent such a qualifier, a better characterization of &quot;thinking the worst&quot; might be &#039;pessimism.&#039;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Paranoia can reasonably be described as &#8220;thinking the worst.&#8221;&#8221;</p>
<p>If you can show that it is delusional or irrational, perhaps.  Absent such a qualifier, a better characterization of &#8220;thinking the worst&#8221; might be &#8216;pessimism.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/obamas-msnbc-whore/comment-page-1/#comment-5516070</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 04:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=189394#comment-5516070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Americana  hiernonymous • 40 minutes ago: &quot;Yes, the inconsistency is what makes me think the worst... &quot;
Paranoia can reasonably be described as &quot;thinking the worst.&quot;
http://www.merriam-webster.Com/dictionary/paranoia


Full Definition of PARANOIA
1
:  a psychosis characterized by systematized delusions of persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations
2
:  a tendency on the part of an individual or group toward excessive or irrational suspiciousness and distrustfulness of others]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americana  hiernonymous • 40 minutes ago: &#8220;Yes, the inconsistency is what makes me think the worst&#8230; &#8221;<br />
Paranoia can reasonably be described as &#8220;thinking the worst.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.merriam-webster.Com/dictionary/paranoia" rel="nofollow">http://www.merriam-webster.Com/dictionary/paranoia</a></p>
<p>Full Definition of PARANOIA<br />
1<br />
:  a psychosis characterized by systematized delusions of persecution or grandeur usually without hallucinations<br />
2<br />
:  a tendency on the part of an individual or group toward excessive or irrational suspiciousness and distrustfulness of others</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 940/991 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 19:19:45 by W3 Total Cache -->