<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hollywood&#8217;s War on Heteronormativity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 04:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Lyda</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5330210</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Lyda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5330210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you agree that Bill Clinton didn&#039;t have sex with Monica Lewinsky?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you agree that Bill Clinton didn&#8217;t have sex with Monica Lewinsky?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cui Pertinebit</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5244772</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cui Pertinebit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5244772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a good point; it should be pointed out that our views do not apply only to homosexuals; we acknowledge that even straight people can be sodomites and deviants.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good point; it should be pointed out that our views do not apply only to homosexuals; we acknowledge that even straight people can be sodomites and deviants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cui Pertinebit</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5244770</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cui Pertinebit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2013 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5244770</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An honestly held view is, by definition, not bigoted. Many honestly held views are discriminatory - but, so what? There is nothing wrong with being discriminatory; in fact, rightly discriminating between things is a mark of wisdom. 

Even your views are discriminatory: do you think it is &quot;mean&quot; and &quot;bad&quot; to disapprove of homosexuality? Then you discriminate against almost everyone, since the majority of the world&#039;s population have always found it morally abhorrent. 

Your confusion, comes from misunderstanding the word &quot;honestly.&quot; I am not using &quot;honestly held view,&quot; to mean &quot;anything I happen to actually think or feel,&quot; because not every thought or feeling is honest. Many thoughts and feelings come from dark and broken places within us, which we little ken. In fact, that&#039;s my view on homosexuality: I don&#039;t doubt that people experiencing homosexual attractions &quot;honestly feel&quot; those attractions - i.e., they didn&#039;t choose them, but they actually do feel them as automatically as I feel heterosexual attraction. But, I don&#039;t think that the fact that they &quot;honestly feel&quot; them, means they are honest feelings. I &quot;honestly feel&quot; anger and irritation against people more frequently than I feel true love for them. But the anger and irritation is not an honest emotion; it is sin, dysfunction and brokenness. 


I am using &quot;honestly held opinion,&quot; to mean an opinion which is held after giving an issue due consideration, and which remains open to examination without an irrationally emotional investment in one outcome or the other. I used to be a liberal and a leftist. Even after becoming Christian, I continued to reject &quot;homophobia,&quot; as I thought of it, for a few years. But I sat down and looked at the situation objectively, finally, and have now come to a reasoned and emotionally cool position, such that even if I lost my Christian Faith tomorrow (which God forbid), I would still regard homosexuality as a psychological dysfunction which we should regard with compassion, not celebration and blanket permission.

Still, consider the viewpoint you mention. If a white man looked at blacks at that time, and did not have many examples of blacks exhibiting intellectual achievement, it would actually be fairly easy to see how he could have believed that they were a lower race. He was not necessarily bigoted; he would only be bigoted, if he was stubbornly invested in being able to continue viewing them that way, and resistant to your attempts to show him men like St. Moses the Black, St. Augustine of Hippo, Popes St. Victor and St. Gelasius, Fredrick Douglas, et al., and so demonstrate to him that his view was based on a narrow knowledge and experience. Only when he irrationally rejected evidence that blacks were capable of the same kinds of intellectual and moral life as whites, would you be able to declare his view, definitively, to be bigoted.  



And besides, as you somewhat acknowledged, the argument is not at all analogous to that regarding homosexuality: nobody believes gays are inferior as human beings; they only believe that they are engaged in an immoral behaviour, toward which they are compelled by an inner defect and wound. There is no question of them being unworthy of human respect and equality; only an insistence that this wound and sickness cannot be celebrated and normatized. It is, in my opinion, bigoted to lump all those who disapprove of homosexuality, into the category of &quot;bigots.&quot; There is plenty of room for reasoned, responsible, rational disagreement on the issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An honestly held view is, by definition, not bigoted. Many honestly held views are discriminatory &#8211; but, so what? There is nothing wrong with being discriminatory; in fact, rightly discriminating between things is a mark of wisdom. </p>
<p>Even your views are discriminatory: do you think it is &#8220;mean&#8221; and &#8220;bad&#8221; to disapprove of homosexuality? Then you discriminate against almost everyone, since the majority of the world&#8217;s population have always found it morally abhorrent. </p>
<p>Your confusion, comes from misunderstanding the word &#8220;honestly.&#8221; I am not using &#8220;honestly held view,&#8221; to mean &#8220;anything I happen to actually think or feel,&#8221; because not every thought or feeling is honest. Many thoughts and feelings come from dark and broken places within us, which we little ken. In fact, that&#8217;s my view on homosexuality: I don&#8217;t doubt that people experiencing homosexual attractions &#8220;honestly feel&#8221; those attractions &#8211; i.e., they didn&#8217;t choose them, but they actually do feel them as automatically as I feel heterosexual attraction. But, I don&#8217;t think that the fact that they &#8220;honestly feel&#8221; them, means they are honest feelings. I &#8220;honestly feel&#8221; anger and irritation against people more frequently than I feel true love for them. But the anger and irritation is not an honest emotion; it is sin, dysfunction and brokenness. </p>
<p>I am using &#8220;honestly held opinion,&#8221; to mean an opinion which is held after giving an issue due consideration, and which remains open to examination without an irrationally emotional investment in one outcome or the other. I used to be a liberal and a leftist. Even after becoming Christian, I continued to reject &#8220;homophobia,&#8221; as I thought of it, for a few years. But I sat down and looked at the situation objectively, finally, and have now come to a reasoned and emotionally cool position, such that even if I lost my Christian Faith tomorrow (which God forbid), I would still regard homosexuality as a psychological dysfunction which we should regard with compassion, not celebration and blanket permission.</p>
<p>Still, consider the viewpoint you mention. If a white man looked at blacks at that time, and did not have many examples of blacks exhibiting intellectual achievement, it would actually be fairly easy to see how he could have believed that they were a lower race. He was not necessarily bigoted; he would only be bigoted, if he was stubbornly invested in being able to continue viewing them that way, and resistant to your attempts to show him men like St. Moses the Black, St. Augustine of Hippo, Popes St. Victor and St. Gelasius, Fredrick Douglas, et al., and so demonstrate to him that his view was based on a narrow knowledge and experience. Only when he irrationally rejected evidence that blacks were capable of the same kinds of intellectual and moral life as whites, would you be able to declare his view, definitively, to be bigoted.  </p>
<p>And besides, as you somewhat acknowledged, the argument is not at all analogous to that regarding homosexuality: nobody believes gays are inferior as human beings; they only believe that they are engaged in an immoral behaviour, toward which they are compelled by an inner defect and wound. There is no question of them being unworthy of human respect and equality; only an insistence that this wound and sickness cannot be celebrated and normatized. It is, in my opinion, bigoted to lump all those who disapprove of homosexuality, into the category of &#8220;bigots.&#8221; There is plenty of room for reasoned, responsible, rational disagreement on the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infovoyeur</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5329958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Infovoyeur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5329958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I quite agree with your article that homosexuality is inferior and not to be &quot;normalized&quot; even for homosexuals, and hence that civil rights etc. approval for integration (military etc.) and sex let alone &quot;same-sex marriage&quot; (and as you said, media infiltration) are dangerous to society.  BUT the Far Left &quot;visionary&quot; stance denies all this , being harnessed to its &quot;steamroller egalitarianism&quot; plus &quot;rubber-stamp respect.&quot;   What can we do against this ignoring of human nature?  The Far Left naively accepting the prosletyzing gay &quot;lifestyle,&quot; is merely the latest &quot;wave&quot; in the left&#039;s dangerous &quot;social storm&quot; of Unlimited Licence etc.  It began by the Left&#039;s (mis-)perceiving the lesser races as equal to the Whites as against needing help....  Then believing Blacks as capable of negotiating freedom.... As seeing women as capable of managing the vote competently plus certain jobs...  As denying that interracial marriages are in fact a kind of unsavory mongelization...   Overall, the Utopian Far Left denies that if you tamper with the Natural Law Order, and innate hierarcheries, even if you are well-intentioned (albeit unrealistic), then harm occurs to both individuals and whole social groups.  But what real defense do we have against this media-splattering &quot;inundation&quot; of hyper-equalization, rubber-stamp &quot;respect,&quot; and the rest?  This exposing to impressionable children, media characters who are inverts, is alas only the latest &quot;splash&quot; in the loss of protective realism which must be a bulwark against &quot;inundation.&quot; Your article at least offers &quot;lifeboats&quot; so to speak.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite agree with your article that homosexuality is inferior and not to be &#8220;normalized&#8221; even for homosexuals, and hence that civil rights etc. approval for integration (military etc.) and sex let alone &#8220;same-sex marriage&#8221; (and as you said, media infiltration) are dangerous to society.  BUT the Far Left &#8220;visionary&#8221; stance denies all this , being harnessed to its &#8220;steamroller egalitarianism&#8221; plus &#8220;rubber-stamp respect.&#8221;   What can we do against this ignoring of human nature?  The Far Left naively accepting the prosletyzing gay &#8220;lifestyle,&#8221; is merely the latest &#8220;wave&#8221; in the left&#8217;s dangerous &#8220;social storm&#8221; of Unlimited Licence etc.  It began by the Left&#8217;s (mis-)perceiving the lesser races as equal to the Whites as against needing help&#8230;.  Then believing Blacks as capable of negotiating freedom&#8230;. As seeing women as capable of managing the vote competently plus certain jobs&#8230;  As denying that interracial marriages are in fact a kind of unsavory mongelization&#8230;   Overall, the Utopian Far Left denies that if you tamper with the Natural Law Order, and innate hierarcheries, even if you are well-intentioned (albeit unrealistic), then harm occurs to both individuals and whole social groups.  But what real defense do we have against this media-splattering &#8220;inundation&#8221; of hyper-equalization, rubber-stamp &#8220;respect,&#8221; and the rest?  This exposing to impressionable children, media characters who are inverts, is alas only the latest &#8220;splash&#8221; in the loss of protective realism which must be a bulwark against &#8220;inundation.&#8221; Your article at least offers &#8220;lifeboats&#8221; so to speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torrentprime</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5242998</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[torrentprime]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5242998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;honestly held views on nature and morality&quot; can still be bigoted and discriminatory.  Many segregation defenders truly believed that God had set whites up as superior to blacks, that nature made it that way, that it was immoral to have whites marry blacks, etc. Those opinions, no matter how &quot;honestly held&quot; do not have to be labeled as anything other than bigotry, however unconscious.
Please note: we are not discussing whether being gay is genetic. We are talking about peoples&#039; reasons for opposing another&#039;s legal and civil rights, where that opposition comes from and how it should be handled - with or without kid gloves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;honestly held views on nature and morality&#8221; can still be bigoted and discriminatory.  Many segregation defenders truly believed that God had set whites up as superior to blacks, that nature made it that way, that it was immoral to have whites marry blacks, etc. Those opinions, no matter how &#8220;honestly held&#8221; do not have to be labeled as anything other than bigotry, however unconscious.<br />
Please note: we are not discussing whether being gay is genetic. We are talking about peoples&#8217; reasons for opposing another&#8217;s legal and civil rights, where that opposition comes from and how it should be handled &#8211; with or without kid gloves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cui Pertinebit</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5329955</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cui Pertinebit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 20:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5329955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They do, however, indict recreational sex. Even if contraception slows the advance of physical disease, moral and mental diseases result en masse from the unseen damage people incur via promiscuity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They do, however, indict recreational sex. Even if contraception slows the advance of physical disease, moral and mental diseases result en masse from the unseen damage people incur via promiscuity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cui Pertinebit</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5242991</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cui Pertinebit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5242991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, your opinion is a function of bigotry and animus, since it is not based on reason, whereas - whether we agree with their arguments or not - there are people who advance their objection to homosexual behaviour on rational grounds not based fundamentally in mere opinion or emotion.  It is very clear that the left&#039;s histrionic shaming and vilifying of people with honestly held views on nature and morality, is far more emotion-based and prejudice-laden.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, your opinion is a function of bigotry and animus, since it is not based on reason, whereas &#8211; whether we agree with their arguments or not &#8211; there are people who advance their objection to homosexual behaviour on rational grounds not based fundamentally in mere opinion or emotion.  It is very clear that the left&#8217;s histrionic shaming and vilifying of people with honestly held views on nature and morality, is far more emotion-based and prejudice-laden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torrentprime</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5329951</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[torrentprime]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5329951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re incorrect. STIs affect both gay and straight people at extremely high rates IF they choose to have unsafe sex. Disease has nothing to do with orientation; it is the result of a choice not to be safe.
Far too many gays don&#039;t choose to be safe and get infected, just as far too many straight couples aren&#039;t safe and create a pregnancy they can&#039;t support. Neither set of individual (bad) choices indicts either homo or heterosexuality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re incorrect. STIs affect both gay and straight people at extremely high rates IF they choose to have unsafe sex. Disease has nothing to do with orientation; it is the result of a choice not to be safe.<br />
Far too many gays don&#8217;t choose to be safe and get infected, just as far too many straight couples aren&#8217;t safe and create a pregnancy they can&#8217;t support. Neither set of individual (bad) choices indicts either homo or heterosexuality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smoking Hamster</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5242851</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smoking Hamster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5242851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever looked up disease rates for practicing homosexuals? Search AIDS and MSM for a starter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever looked up disease rates for practicing homosexuals? Search AIDS and MSM for a starter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smoking Hamster</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5329950</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smoking Hamster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5329950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should kids even have sexual desires and be homosexual? Should they be encouraged to engage in the unhealthy gay lifestyle or encouraged by their parents to resist their desires?

If your kid said he desired alcohol all the time would you give it to him? Alcoholism and homosexuality are both unhealthy behaviors that should be discouraged by society.

Straight people do not practice sex in that way as often as gay men do by any means. And nobody is defending it for straight couples. Except in Islam where your wife[ves] is a field to be plowed however you wish.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should kids even have sexual desires and be homosexual? Should they be encouraged to engage in the unhealthy gay lifestyle or encouraged by their parents to resist their desires?</p>
<p>If your kid said he desired alcohol all the time would you give it to him? Alcoholism and homosexuality are both unhealthy behaviors that should be discouraged by society.</p>
<p>Straight people do not practice sex in that way as often as gay men do by any means. And nobody is defending it for straight couples. Except in Islam where your wife[ves] is a field to be plowed however you wish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torrentprime</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5242845</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[torrentprime]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5242845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any one can deny that. &quot;Abnormal: deviating from what is normal or usual, typically in a way that is undesirable or worrying&quot;. Homosexuality is rare, yes, only a few percentage of the population. But calling it &quot;undesirable&quot; or &quot;worrying&quot; is just a function of bigotry and animus. And fortunately fewer and fewer people every year agree with such a negative label.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any one can deny that. &#8220;Abnormal: deviating from what is normal or usual, typically in a way that is undesirable or worrying&#8221;. Homosexuality is rare, yes, only a few percentage of the population. But calling it &#8220;undesirable&#8221; or &#8220;worrying&#8221; is just a function of bigotry and animus. And fortunately fewer and fewer people every year agree with such a negative label.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ratonis</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5242815</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ratonis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5242815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not a matter of &quot;cheating.&quot; It is a matter of paying necessary dues to heterosexual normality. A lesbian getting artificial insemination is getting something from a man, whether through physical or technological injection. The simple facts: heterosexuality is normal; homosexuality is abnormal and anomalous. It is not un-natural, as it occurs in nature, but it is clearly abnormal. Who can deny that? But, today simple truth is hate speech.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a matter of &#8220;cheating.&#8221; It is a matter of paying necessary dues to heterosexual normality. A lesbian getting artificial insemination is getting something from a man, whether through physical or technological injection. The simple facts: heterosexuality is normal; homosexuality is abnormal and anomalous. It is not un-natural, as it occurs in nature, but it is clearly abnormal. Who can deny that? But, today simple truth is hate speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5242755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5242755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOL Must be why California is suffering from so much.  Many people there are tired of the homosexual agenda.  I tell you, I will NOT be sorry when the state goes under the sea]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL Must be why California is suffering from so much.  Many people there are tired of the homosexual agenda.  I tell you, I will NOT be sorry when the state goes under the sea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5242754</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5242754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s kind of stupid if you ask me.  If a lesbian doesn&#039;t like men, then why she is sleeping with a MAN?  She should just go straight, &amp; get a man.  Besides, the man+woman environment is better for the child.  Homosexuals are liars &amp; deceivers of truth &amp; logic]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s kind of stupid if you ask me.  If a lesbian doesn&#8217;t like men, then why she is sleeping with a MAN?  She should just go straight, &amp; get a man.  Besides, the man+woman environment is better for the child.  Homosexuals are liars &amp; deceivers of truth &amp; logic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torrentprime</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5242705</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[torrentprime]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5242705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The shows weren&#039;t &quot;gay-themed&quot;. They had gay characters. Lots and lots of shows that didn&#039;t have gay characters were also canceled, and no one advanced even a hint of an argument that gay characters were in any way a cause of any show&#039;s cancelation.
And Modern Family and Glee seem to be doing pretty well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The shows weren&#8217;t &#8220;gay-themed&#8221;. They had gay characters. Lots and lots of shows that didn&#8217;t have gay characters were also canceled, and no one advanced even a hint of an argument that gay characters were in any way a cause of any show&#8217;s cancelation.<br />
And Modern Family and Glee seem to be doing pretty well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torrentprime</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5242703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[torrentprime]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5242703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More people - vastly more - are straight, of course. No one is arguing otherwise. What is being successfully combatted is the idea that having a straight relationship is somehow the only way, or the right way, or the expected way to be, that those kids who are gay are somehow not as normal as straight kids (if far more rare).
The article is confusing an expectation to conform with population statistics.


And straight people (both men and women) do that thing you find so bothersome, and they alway have.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More people &#8211; vastly more &#8211; are straight, of course. No one is arguing otherwise. What is being successfully combatted is the idea that having a straight relationship is somehow the only way, or the right way, or the expected way to be, that those kids who are gay are somehow not as normal as straight kids (if far more rare).<br />
The article is confusing an expectation to conform with population statistics.</p>
<p>And straight people (both men and women) do that thing you find so bothersome, and they alway have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: torrentprime</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5242701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[torrentprime]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 08:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5242701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it &quot;cheating&quot; when infertile straight couples use the same techniques to have children?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it &#8220;cheating&#8221; when infertile straight couples use the same techniques to have children?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacobite2</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5329941</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacobite2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 04:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5329941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several surveys have shown beyond doubt that &quot;G&quot; and &quot;PG&quot; Rated movies make a lot more money that &quot;R&quot; and &quot;NR&quot; or whatever it is now. Yet Hollywood continues to treat family-friendly films like duties performed under an indenture. Well, &#039;Hollywood&#039; (if you know who I mean, and I know you do) is working to destroy this society (I refer to American/WASP society), and the shared religion of Americans is an important part of the societal foundation. With the ACLU on one side and pop culture on the other, normal life is being clobbered thoroughly. &#039;Hollywood&#039; didn&#039;t expect to earn a lot of money making &quot;Mission to Moscow&quot; either, but the fact that it was Soviet agit-prop was sufficient motivation. Just as today, the fr*kk*n&#039; &#039;Hollywood elites&#039; are still making movies with Nazi villains. Hell, a drummer boy would be almost 90, who are they tryin&#039; to kid? Of course, if you were a &#039;Hollywood elite&#039; your enemies would all be white Christians, and what&#039;s the diff between some Methodist in fly-over country and Hitler?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several surveys have shown beyond doubt that &#8220;G&#8221; and &#8220;PG&#8221; Rated movies make a lot more money that &#8220;R&#8221; and &#8220;NR&#8221; or whatever it is now. Yet Hollywood continues to treat family-friendly films like duties performed under an indenture. Well, &#8216;Hollywood&#8217; (if you know who I mean, and I know you do) is working to destroy this society (I refer to American/WASP society), and the shared religion of Americans is an important part of the societal foundation. With the ACLU on one side and pop culture on the other, normal life is being clobbered thoroughly. &#8216;Hollywood&#8217; didn&#8217;t expect to earn a lot of money making &#8220;Mission to Moscow&#8221; either, but the fact that it was Soviet agit-prop was sufficient motivation. Just as today, the fr*kk*n&#8217; &#8216;Hollywood elites&#8217; are still making movies with Nazi villains. Hell, a drummer boy would be almost 90, who are they tryin&#8217; to kid? Of course, if you were a &#8216;Hollywood elite&#8217; your enemies would all be white Christians, and what&#8217;s the diff between some Methodist in fly-over country and Hitler?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Marks</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5242531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Marks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 23:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5242531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While people keep spending their money on Hollywood propaganda it will keep getting made. Sadly the guild like nature of Hollywood (especially since the various parts of the industry were unionised) means there is little creative competition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While people keep spending their money on Hollywood propaganda it will keep getting made. Sadly the guild like nature of Hollywood (especially since the various parts of the industry were unionised) means there is little creative competition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marvin E. Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/ben-shapiro/hollywoods-battle-against-heteronormativity/comment-page-1/#comment-5329932</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marvin E. Fox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 22:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=196059#comment-5329932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is possible to legalize same sex marriage; however, same sex marriages are not possible. A marriage is only possible between one man and one woman.

Eroticism isn  not necessarily sex just because the purpose of erotic action is to have an orgasm.

The question to be asked is: are fellatio, cunnilingus, and sodomy sexual acts, or are they merely erotic acts to produce orgasm?



The left will say whatever supports their plan to normalize those acts as sex in marriage.
The Answers from the Right will be based more on the traditional view of marriage given by God, and shaped by many millennia of having babies.
Marvin Fox]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is possible to legalize same sex marriage; however, same sex marriages are not possible. A marriage is only possible between one man and one woman.</p>
<p>Eroticism isn  not necessarily sex just because the purpose of erotic action is to have an orgasm.</p>
<p>The question to be asked is: are fellatio, cunnilingus, and sodomy sexual acts, or are they merely erotic acts to produce orgasm?</p>
<p>The left will say whatever supports their plan to normalize those acts as sex in marriage.<br />
The Answers from the Right will be based more on the traditional view of marriage given by God, and shaped by many millennia of having babies.<br />
Marvin Fox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 731/762 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-31 00:13:14 by W3 Total Cache -->