Passing the ̶B̶u̶c̶k-̶ Cuts

While trying to blame Republicans, Obama is threatening that the sequestration cuts will be allocated in order to hit average Americans, including Obama voters, where they will most feel it.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

  • Mary Sue

    He did his best impersonation of John Kerry by being for it before he was against it ;)

    • JacksonPearson

      I gotta say, it's a good thing that I'm not allowed to have Obama's knife to do the cutting, because I'd carve away half of government. Moreover, I'd bet, our government would still function at half the price, and maybe even more efficient.

  • Tammy

    Very offensive. I'm sorry I opened this link and saw a cartoon with a very bad mental image. Bad enough it makes me cancel my subscription to Front Page.

    • Spider

      Good riddence

    • NextVoiceUHear

      I agree. Seeing that negrobazztardusurper is enuff to upset anyone.

    • johnnywoods

      Don`t let the door hit your butt on the way out.

    • Barakus abomidas

      Tammy, you know thats a false depiction, id never be so bold.

    • JacksonPearson

      Sssolong, don't forget to put the cat out, shut the lights off…Sweet dreams!

    • Tammy Inverse

      Tammy you are false & tricksy!

      1.) Obama came up with the ideal of the sequester.

      2.) Obama is the one as the Executive of deciding where the cuts will be. He is purposely cutting muscle & bone instead of fat.

      That makes him immoral & guilty. You have a problem with a political cartoon that makes this point. that makes you immoral& guilty.

      Chris Christie balanced the New Jersey state budget in part by cutting fat like show up once a year commission for a a big paycheck

      I am going thru all the dross oif a web search to find evidence of government largesse created by the political class for their benefit Here is an example.

      "Christie slow to eliminate part-time employees from troubled retirement system"

      You can cut fat & not go straight for the police & fire like politicians always do.

      President Obama deserves scorn. Obama is keeping a carrier battle group in port instead of cutting somewhere else in the military budget like Green energy programs. Obama is willing to weaken the U.S. to get his way.

      Go join Obama. You deserve each other.

  • Loyal Achates

    But I thought less government spending was gooooood. Now we're told that cuts in federal funding will hurt the economy??? So confuuusssssed!!!

    • JoJoJams

      "While trying to blame Republicans, Obama is threatening that the sequestration cuts will be allocated in order to hit average Americans, including Obama voters, where they will most feel it."

      L.A., the caption states that it's Obama threatening these things. Nowhere in the caption does it state what you somehow construed from it. Yes, less government is good – And the only one stating that "cuts in federal funding will hurt the economy" is the Obama scare machine – and you, with your statement that really only shows your own lack of reading comprehension and critical thinking skills, in your zeal to somehow score sophomoric "points" against those you deem your adversaries.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      "But I thought less government spending was gooooood."

      It is good.

      "Now we're told that cuts in federal funding will hurt the economy???"

      Please quote what you're referring to. Generally cuts in government spending help the economy. That assumes it's done honestly. Cutting spending without restoring the funds is worse.

      "So confuuusssssed!!!"

      You sure are. It's difficult to take you seriously.

    • Get Real

      - Any many the government spends comes from taxes
      -Those taxes come from people.
      – They now have less money to spend.

      So those people have less money to spend which depresses aggregate demand. The government has more money to spend which increases aggregate demand.

      But taking too much money from people disincentivizes them from working earning & thus their future spending.

      Case in point my spouse. They come from communist China. A mere 9 years after arriving here they made the comment (I'll paraphrase "Why work more than 40 hours a week. the more you make the more they take?"

      My spouse has lived more Communism than you have ever dreamed. My spouse is a harder worker & believes in some communist tenets to this day. Yet they see the problem with a progressive government that takes because it can, enables loafers & the political class & disincentivizes others.

      Join Tammy (see above).

  • NextVoiceUHear

    Mmmmm Mmmmmm mmmmm

  • bryane

    Strange that “sequester” seems to mean “Ian claiming to cut 10 times what I need to cut”, at least based on all the scary stories being reported. If it all *really* happens, we may be in much better shape financially.

    Very good graphic of what’s happening here.

  • BLJ

    Obama is the biggest con man since the Wizard of Oz. He only cares about his Statist Islamic agenda. The fools that voted for him (as well as those who helped him steal the election) are of no concern to him.