Denial About Stockholm


hedstrom20130524132542140Why are leading conservative magazines buying into the lie that the Swedish riots have nothing to do with Islam?

The June 4 issue of National Review contained a piece entitled “Torching Utopia” and subtitled “Sweden’s problem is not Islam, it’s multiculturalism.” Its author, Tino Sanandaji, an Iranian Kurd who has lived in Sweden for many years and who studied economics in the U.S., had one principal point to make: that there does exist a “fierce hostility toward Swedish culture” in Sweden, but that it originates not with Muslim immigrants but with Swedish elites. To support this claim, he cited one Swedish politician’s declaration, some years ago, that “Swedes are jealous of immigrants” because the latter “have a culture, an identity, a history, something that binds you together,” while Swedes have only “Midsummer’s Eve and other lame things.” What Sanandaji chose not to point out was that the politician who made that statement, Mona Sahlin, made it while addressing an audience of Muslims in a mosque; and she didn’t say that Swedes were jealous of immigrants generally – she said that they were jealous of Muslims, because Islamic culture is wonderful and manifestly superior to Swedish culture.

Yes, Swedish elites hold Swedish culture in contempt. But so do Muslim immigrants – in the same way that they hold the local culture in contempt in every non-Muslim country in which they reside. Yes, the Swedish elites’ contempt for their own culture has made it easier for Muslims to express their contempt – but the Muslims would feel that contempt anyway. And it’s the palpable contempt of Muslims in Sweden for Swedish culture that has motivated the Swedish elite – in a perverse, pathetic, and increasingly desperate attempt to please and pacify the Muslims among them – to express their own contempt for Swedish society so openly.

Many of Sanandaji’s points were splendid, as far as they went. “Cultural self-confidence is essential for integration,” he wrote. He complained that there’s no established “social contract wherein Swedes accept immigrants as one of their own once certain obligations are fulfilled”; that Sweden isn’t an easy country to integrate into, because “Swedes tend to be reticent, solitary, and reserved,” with “a complex culture, full of subtle rules and opaque codes of conduct”; and that “Swedes are conformist and quite intolerant of deviation from group norms….Icy Scandinavia was never a particularly well-chosen testing ground for the multiculturalist experiment.”

I’ve made each of these points myself about the Scandinavian countries. Yes, they’re small and insular, almost more like large families than small countries, where a little dissent or diversity traditionally went a long way. And yes, this makes it especially tough to be the kind of immigrant who actually wants to work hard and fit in. And yet, despite these challenges, immigrants to Sweden from East Asian nations, such as China and Vietnam, aren’t rioting. Neither are Christians from South America and sub-Saharan Africa or Hindus from India. If people from these places don’t find good jobs in Sweden, they take whatever they can get, and work their butts off and keep their noses clean. And if they can’t even find a crummy job, they’ll come up with some other way to get by – they’ll start a restaurant or some other small business.

Yes, Sanandaji is right in arguing that the current nightmare in Sweden wouldn’t be happening if not for multiculturalism. But it wouldn’t be happening, either, if Sweden had chosen, three or four decades ago, to limit its intake of non-Western immigrants to non-Muslims.

On to Johan Norberg’s “Why Sweden has riots,” published in the Spectator, the venerable British Tory weekly, on June 8. Norberg, a well-known historian who, like Sanandaji, is a champion of “liberal” (i.e. non-socialist) economics, started off by explaining just why leftist “explanations” of the Stockholm riots didn’t hold water. Citing the claim that “youths” had rioted because authorities had closed “the health care centre, the post office, the midwives’ centre and the youth centre,” Norberg pointed out that “there are three youth centres in Husby,” that the neighborhood’s “old health care centre” had in fact been replaced by a new one, and so on. He argued that “if poverty is the cause of riots, almost every city on the continent should have been burned down before Stockholm’s turn came.” Economic inequality? “My country is the most equal in Europe save for Slovenia.”

What, then, was Norberg’s explanation for the riots? In a phrase, Sweden’s “strong employment protection” – for example, laws requiring that “the last person to be hired must be the first person to be sacked” and that “if you employ someone longer than six months, the contract is automatically made permanent.” Thanks to such policies, he argued, “Sweden has the fewest low-wage, entry-level jobs in Europe.” Indeed, for those “with poor education, experience or language skills,” Sweden “is not such a utopia after all.” The result? A generation of young men “with nothing to do and nothing to lose, standing on the outside, looking in, with a sense of worthlessness, humiliation and boredom.”

As with Sanandaji, everything Norberg said was true – as far as it went. Yes, as I’ve said, Scandinavian countries are rough are on non-Scandinavians (not just non-Westerners or Muslims) wanting to break into the job market. In competing for a good job, a mediocre ethnic Scandinavian will routinely win out over a much more gifted foreigner, whether from Pakistan, China, the U.S., or wherever. The difference – again – is that immigrants from non-Muslim countries who are frustrated by this obvious injustice don’t start riots; they find some way to make it, just as resourceful and resilient immigrants to Western countries always have. It’s only the immigrants who’ve been brought up to believe in jihadist ideology –  and thus in their own innate superiority to their host country’s natives – who start these riots. But people like Norberg (who, in fact, is so deeply into denial about his country’s real problems that he actually supports an open-border policy) don’t want to face up to this obvious truth.

Last but not least, the June 10 issue of the Weekly Standard contained an article entitled “How to Explain the Swedish Riots: The standard answers of the left are wrong.”

Despite that subtitle, the author, Paula Neuding – yet another “liberal” Swedish economist – didn’t start off criticizing left-wing “answers” but, instead, dismissing conservative claims, namely the idea, spread through “the American blogosphere,” that the riots “are related to Islam.” This, she declared flatly, “is not the case.” Her evidence? Well, first of all, “Muslim leaders…have denounced the violence and urged calm.” Second, the man whose shooting purportedly triggered the riots was Portuguese. And third, the rioters “have not appealed to Islam or otherwise indicated that their violence is religiously motivated,” but instead “cite police brutality and social injustice to justify their actions.”

Never mind the riots began in an overwhelmingly Muslim neighborhood and that participants were heard shouting “Allah akbar.” Yes, Neuding went on to reject the left’s uncritical acceptance of the “social injustice” line. But she also chose, just as firmly, to dismiss the obvious role of Islam.

How then, did Neuding explain the riots? Well, that’s where her piece got puzzling. She pointed out, truthfully enough, that Sweden is “among the world’s least racist countries,” that it now has the highest immigration rates of any Western nation, that the average Swede “pays more than half his salary in taxes to fund welfare services” (mostly for immigrants), and that “Sweden has shown its minorities a generosity that is probably unparalleled in the world.”

All true. But what was her point? Simply this: that “the Swedish riots pose a real challenge to the standard progressive theory, which tends to explain social problems with reference to a lack of resources, inadequate public investments, and uneven distribution of wealth. If not even egalitarian Sweden is spared riots and violence, and if the progressive theory is the answer, to what lengths must we go in order to persuade unruly youths to channel their grievances through the democratic process?” In other words, Neuding didn’t offer any explanation whatsoever as to why the riots happened; all she had to give us was a comprehensive refutation of the left-wing claim that it was all about “social injustice” – and a feeble denial of the centrality of Islam to the whole nightmare.

It’s not surprising that Sanandaji, Norberg, and Neuding would proffer such nonsense by way of “explaining” the Stockholm riots. Despite certain philosophical differences, they’re all in the business of promoting non-socialist economic ideas in an exceedingly socialist country. When they see something like the tumult in the streets of Stockholm, then, their reflexive response is to blame it on problems with the socialist economy. In short, they’re so preoccupied with economic systems, economic problems, and economic solutions that cultural phenomena such as the Islamic doctrine of jihad simply have no place on their radar screen. That such people would have such a major blind spot is, I suppose, understandable. Less understandable is why ordinarily sensible journals such as the National Review, Weekly Standard, and Spectator would choose to publish such patently misguided “explanations” of Stockholm’s recent unpleasantness.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

  • Hktony

    Muslims are always victims. Liberals will make sure we all remember that. They are not interested in the truth. And quite frankly I’ve stopped listening to all left-wing and muslim speakers. There needs to be a real pushback not an analysis of what they say, that is pointless- marxist never listen and Muslims never listen. The real democrats should simply state their story and not entangle themselves in a dialogue with these people.

  • Chez

    Prescient as usual, Bruce. I would only add that it wasn’t JUST a preoccupation with economics that resulted in these three overlooking the 800 pound gorilla in the room. It was also the result of the psychological triumph of dhimmitude. These three were either frightened, brainwashed, or both, into contorting reality sufficient enough to repudiate a patently obvious cause-and-effect.

    Orwell warned us of the possibility of a day when otherwise intelligent people might concede that 2+2=5. That day has surely come, manifest every time a non-Muslim proclaims that Islam is a peaceful, tolerant religion.

  • Brigitte

    The West = perfectionist. We look back➔feel lacking➔analyse, improve➔through trial and error, end up being quite extraordinary and leading the way.
    The Ummah = arrogant, profoundly dishonest, shameless➔believes itself perfect, never allows self-criticism, worsens rather than improves; stupid➔takes our “self-disgust” literally (let’s not do the same); hateful➔destructs us, themselves, everything that is good.
    The West and the Ummah don’t mix. It should be our way or the highway.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    The problem is the West stupidly conflates what is really jihad as being terrorism, but terrorism is not holy fighting in the cause of Allah for the establishment of Islam, as that’s jihad instead. Thus, this opens the door for all kinds of leftwing loons and Ron Paul kooks to blame everything else and the kitchen sink but Islam for the creation of terrorism. Nevertheless, if jihad were called what it really is: jihad, which is holy fighting in the cause of Allah to establish Islam, there wouldn’t be any question as to what caused the violence in Stockholm.

    Furthermore, if jihad wasn’t conflated as being terrorism, it would be understood that jihad, in stark contrast to terrorism, is both violent and non-violent but astronomically far more non-violent relative to violent. For instance, mass Muslim immigration to the West is one of the most ubiquitous forms of non-violent jihad, but it goes unopposed because jihad is conflated as being terrorism, which is always and only violent. Hence, because mass Muslim immigration to the West isn’t violent, then it isn’t understood and construed as being terrorism, but, of course, jihad and terrorism are two completely different manifestations altogether. Terrorism is perpetrated for all kinds of different reasons by all kinds of people, while jihad is always and only holy fighting in the cause of Allah for the establishment of Islam, can be either violent or non-violent, but mostly is non-violent, and is always only waged by Muslims.

    • Edohiguma

      Erdogan said it a few years ago: “What the ottoman empire failed to do with its armies at the gates of Vienna, we will now achieve with our fertile women.”

      It’s war.

      • http://tundratabloids.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/three-types-of-totalitarian-ideologies.jpg Illwill

        No, it’s not war. Without going into semantics to prove my point, I will simply state that a war is a struggle/fight between two parties. Since we’re not defending ourselves, it’s not war.

        Genocide, invasion…there are other words that better describe what’s happening in the (soon formely) civilized world.

        But Inshallah, we will survive…as slaves to the muslim Übermensch.

        • Drakken

          War nevertheless is coming and once the European DNA of conquer and kill kicks in, the untermensch muslims will be a very endangered species. Make no mistake it is coming.

          • http://tundratabloids.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/three-types-of-totalitarian-ideologies.jpg Illwill

            I don’t believe that you’re right…but I really hope so.

  • Jane Larson

    so sad there can’t be an ultra-white reservation anymore

  • Larry

    THE EVIL INSANITY OF MOHAMMEDANISM.

    There is no Islamic fundamentalism, Islamo – fascism, political Islam, Islamic
    terrorists, Islamic militants, jihadists, Wahhabism, radical Islam, Islamists who
    have hijacked the religion. There has been no hijacking. These demented souls are following exactly the teachings of the Quran – they are following in the footsteps of their founder – the man of evil – Muhammad. The reality is that Radical Muslims are true Muslims – who are following exactly the teachings of Islam as recorded in the Quran. In the end

    – IT’S ALL ABOUT ISLAM STUPID INFIDEL.

    Islam is a barbaric, sexist, violent ideology (not a religion) that worships a pevert god (Allah) and women are oppressed under Islam. How could any reasonable person be ‘proud’ to follow a man who was a pedophile,
    endorser of clitoridectomy, slave trader, rapist, polygamist, punched his
    child bride and endorsed whipping/beating women and ploughing them
    like fields, stoned women to death, flogged his slave women for fornication
    while he had sex with slaves himself, raped his slaves, propositioned women and passed them round to friends, denied women equal inheritance, or equality under the law etc forever and abused and denigrated them in every way–not to
    mention his general sadism to others, mass murder, beheading captives, massacres, terror, assassinations, owning slaves and raping them, looting and pillaging, amputations, flogging, thievery, lying, hate, megalomania— unending horror.

    All Muslims believe the Quran is the Eternal divine word of God – the Eternal laws of God – that God authored the Koran and a copy of the Quran is in heaven. The Quran remains for all Muslims, not just “fundamentalists,” the uncreated word of God Himself. It is valid for all times and places forever; its ideas are absolutely true and beyond all criticism. To question it is to question the very word of God, and hence blasphemous. A Muslim’s duty is to believe it and obey its divine commands without question.

    A Muslim has the full right granted by God to do the following to infidels:

    Infidels can be murdered by Muslims as an ETERNAL LAW OF GOD. Not only can they all be murdered but the wives and daughters of the murdered infidels can be taken as booty, raped, and then sold as slaves. That’s right – God permits the raping of female slaves. Indeed in Islam – rape is not a only
    a sexual weapon – it is a weapon of war. Having murdered the woman’s
    man, Muslims can now – sanctioned by the law of God complete their final
    humiliation and domination of her body. Her sons can be sold into slavery. If there is any doubt as to the boy’s age of puberty – Muslims can pull down their pants and inspect their genital area for hairs. Even the slightest sign of hair growth means that these young men can be taken and beheaded. These
    infidel women can then be bred like cattle and their off spring sold for profit. As an ETERNAL LAW OF GOD, Muslims can then loot and pillage the property of the murdered infidels, and must share 1/5 of the booty obtained from the sale of boys and women and the proceeds of looting with God. Muslims can own slaves as an ETERNAL LAW OF GOD. Slavery has been an integral
    institutionalized part of Islam since it’s creation by Muhammad.

    The Names of Muhammad’s Slaves

    The Prophet owned some male and female slaves, among whom were the following:

    Ibn al-Qayyim said:

    Zayd ibn Haarithah
    ibn Shuraaheel, the beloved of the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). He freed him and arranged his marriage to his freed slave woman Umm Ayman, and she bore him Usaamah. His other slaves include Aslam, Abu Raafi’, Thawbaan, Abu Kabshah Sulaym, Shaqraan (whose name was Saalih), Rabaah (who was Nubian), Yassaar (who was also Nubian and was killed by the ‘Arniyeen); Mid’am and Kirkirah (another Nubian) – these two were killed at Khaybar. They also included Anjashah al-Haadi and Safeenah ibn Farookh, whose real name was Mihraan, but the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) called him Safeenah (= “ship”) because they used to make him carry their luggage when they traveled, so he said, “You are a ship (anta safeenah).” Abu Haatim said that the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) freed him; someone else said that Umm Salamah freed him.
    The Prophet’s slaves also included Anasah, whose nickname was Abu Mashrah; Aflah; ‘Ubayd; Tahmaan – also known as Keesaan; Dhakwaan; Mihraan; Marwaan – although it was said that this was another name of Tahmaan, and Allaah knows best; Hunayn; Sandar; Fudaalah (who was Yemeni); Maaboor (who was a eunuch); Waaqid; Abu Waaqid; Qassaam; Abu ‘Usayb and Abu Muwayhabah.

    His female slaves included: Salma (Umm Raafi’); Maymoonah bint Sa’d; Khadrah; Radwa; Razeenah; Umm Dameerah; Maymoonah bint Abi ‘Usayb; Maariyah and Rayhaanah.

    Zaad al-Ma’aad,
    1/114-116

    (A) Male Slaves:

    Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya relies always on the prophet’s biographies written by great ancient scholars. Therefore, he is regarded by Muslims as an authority, a primary source and a leader among the students of the Islamic religion. This scholar tells us in his book, “Zad al-Ma’ad” (part 1, pp. 114, 115, and 116), the following,

    “These are the names of Muhammad’s male slaves:

    Yakan Abu Sharh, Aflah, ‘Ubayd, Dhakwan, Tahman, Mirwan, Hunayn, Sanad, Fadala Yamamin, Anjasha al-Hadi, Mad’am, Karkara, Abu Rafi’, Thawban, Ab Kabsha, Salih, Rabah, Yara Nubyan, Fadila, Waqid, Mabur, Abu Waqid, Kasam, Abu ‘Ayb, Abu Muwayhiba, Zayd Ibn Haritha, and also a black slave called Mahran, who was re-named (by Muhammad) Safina
    (`ship’).

    He himself relates his own story; he says:

    “The apostle of God and his companions went on a trip. (When) their belongings became too heavy for them to carry, Muhammad told me, `Spread your garment.’ They filled it with their belongings, and then they put it on me. The apostle of God told me, `Carry (it), for you are a ship.’

    ‘ Even if I was carrying the load of six or seven donkeys while we were on a journey, anyone who felt weak would throw his clothes or his shield or his sword on me so I would carry that, a heavy load.
    The prophet told me, `You are a ship”‘ (refer to Ibn Qayyim, pp. 115-116;
    al-Hulya, Vol. 1, p. 369, quoted from Ahmad 5:222).

    Muhammad owned 40 slaves. Muhammad was allowed by a ETERNAL LAW OF God to rape his slaves ALLTHIS EVIL ARE THE LAWS OF GOD AS SET DOWN IN THE KORAN. Not only that but righteous Muslims who slay and are slain in the service of God can ascend as martyrs to the evil sexually depraved Islamic Paradise of eternal erections and virgins who re – generate as virgins after each sex act. THIS IS THEIR ETERNAL REWARD FOR OBEYING THESE EVIL
    LAWS OF GOD.

    What I have described are not sins or crimes against the Laws of God -THEY ARE THE LAWS OF GOD.

    Ask yourself the following questions:

    How can any Normal, rational, reasonable person read the Quran with it’s language of pure hate, terror, violence – a blue print of murder, war, slaughter and not immediately realize that these are not the words/teachings of any God – not the teachings of any God – The Creator of the Universe – a God of Peace and Goodness but the words and teachings of a 7th century Arab chieftain –
    Muhammad.

    Slavery is one of the most evil and vile institutions ever created by humanity. Slavery is an integral institution central to Islam. As a Muslim you can kill non – Muslims, take their wives and daughters as sex slaves, rape them at will, loot and pillage, sell the sons and women and daughters into slavery and then MUST share the immoral proceeds with God. Can you imagine such evil
    insanity?

    To any rational, normal person reading these Qurnic verses (and these are
    just a small sample of the 1000’s and 1000.s of the total teachings of hate,
    terror, cruelty, depravity etc that are Islam.) the claim by Muslims that they
    are reading the words, teachings, laws of God is insanity.

    How can you be a normal person and believe in a religion that preaches a Paradise of big breasted, big eyed sexual nymphs called Houris that you can molest with eternal erections for all eternity, in the presence of God who teaches you how to engage in orgies, group sex etc.

    How can you be normal and believe that by fulfilling Qurnic teaching
    9:111- “Lo! Allah hath bought from the believers their lives and their wealth
    because the Garden will be theirs: they shall fight in the way of Allah and
    shall slay and be slain” you will go to this demented sexual whorehouse of God
    and not directly to hell and damnation.

    9:111 is the teaching that has been used by Muhammad and his lieutenants to mobilize the suicide bombers, the beheaders, the jihadists to kill and slaughter millions. An estimated 270,000,000 people have been murdered by Islam because of 9:111 over the past 1400 years.

  • rbskillin

    I believe the definitive answer of why there are riots in Sweden can be found at: http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/savages-of-stockholm/

  • AmericaFirst

    Why are savage Muslims flooding into Europe in the first place? Who opened the floodgates? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ

    • UCSPanther

      When in doubt, blame the Jews, never mind that Hitler gave you European antisemites your wish…

      • AmericaFirst

        Hey, if it’s “anti-Semitic” to point out the fact that jews have lead the charge in opening America and Europe to third-world immigration and facilitating our gradual decline into third-world sh*tholes, I gladly admit to being an anti-Semite. Check it out for yourselves: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/01/the-jewish-origins-of-multiculturalism-in-sweden/

        • UCSPanther

          Translation: Gas all the Jews because of a few idiots.

          Yeah. Like that helped your long-dead fuhrer…

          • http://tundratabloids.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/three-types-of-totalitarian-ideologies.jpg Illwill

            Yes, of course. Criticizing jews is the same as wanting to murder them all. Hmm, with that logic: muslims follow a very disgusting and totalitarian ideology-religion hybrid that makes even judaism and christianity seem somewhat normal (well, not really).

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “Yes, of course. Criticizing jews is the same as wanting to murder them all.”

            Criticize anyone or anything you want, but when you use the same lies that historically led to efforts to exterminate your target, it’s not a difficult leap to make.

            Who is the caliph of the Jews? Who’s organizing all of these conspiracies? What’s your rational theory? You don’t need one. In your mind.

          • http://tundratabloids.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/three-types-of-totalitarian-ideologies.jpg Illwill

            Oh, MY mind? So because I thought the Panther read a tad too much into the statement AmericaFirst made, I am a nazi that wants to murder all jews? I guess I should be glad not all people are as “objective” as you.

            You’re not a commie by any chance? Those tend to use the same “logic” as you are, which is funny in a way…since communism and national socialism are extremely similar ideologies. But no, sñr objective, I am not from the extreme left (either of the two)…if anything I am from the opposite side of the political spectrum – capitalism, the “right”. But I am also a fan of logic/intelligence/knowledge and freedom of speech. I detest every single religion, yet I strongly feel that people should have the right to both criticize and defend christianity, judaism…even the pure evil totalitarian ideology that is islam.

            But apparently you and the Panther feel differently and your rational theory is that anyone that criticizes jews must want to murder them all. Oh sorry, of course you were ok with that…it’s when people use the “same lies” that you react. So, tell me, when exactly did Hitler et al. claim that the jews “lead the charge in opening America and Europe to third-world immigration”?

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “Oh, MY mind? So because I thought the Panther read a tad too much into the statement AmericaFirst made, I am a nazi that wants to murder all jews? I guess I should be glad not all people are as “objective” as you.”

            Please quote me. I have no idea how you would infer that. Maybe I got lost in the thread. Where did I say that?

            “You’re not a commie by any chance?”

            You must be new around here.

            “Those tend to use the same “logic” as you are, which is funny in a way…since communism and national socialism are extremely similar ideologies.”

            Anyone who conflates my ideas with the ideas that come from the left has serious problems with adult-level reading comprehension and discernment.

            “But no, sñr objective, I am not from the extreme left (either of the two)…if anything I am from the opposite side of the political spectrum – capitalism, the “right”. But I am also a fan of logic/intelligence/knowledge and freedom of speech. I detest every single religion, yet I strongly feel that people should have the right to both criticize and defend christianity, judaism…even the pure evil totalitarian ideology that is islam.”

            If you were born Chinese and made it to a leadership position, you’d be one of the happiest men on the planet. They’re not conservative. They use capitalism to control their populations and then hope to eventually rule the world under the banner of communism. And they generally think they’re genetically superior.

            Criticize anything you want. You’ll be judged by what you say. That’s how America works. The Internet is largely run on those values.

            “But apparently you and the Panther feel differently and your rational theory is that anyone that criticizes jews must want to murder them all.”

            Apparently you need a lot more work on reading comprehension.

            “Oh sorry, of course you were ok with that…it’s when people use the “same lies” that you react. So, tell me, when exactly did Hitler et al. claim that the jews “lead the charge in opening America and Europe to third-world immigration”?”

            The lie that “world Jewry” is working to rule others around the world, has been around a long time. Hitler used it too.

        • Omar

          The jews are over-represented in the “smartest guy in class” category. And it’s this group that usually falls for the latest brilliant, new idea, whether its communism, EU utopianism, globalism, multi-culturalism, etc. and then ends up in a position to do something about it. (I think Sowel has written a bit about this group – which obviously includes a lot of jews, but is not exclusively jewish). . . .Remember, correlation is not causation.

          • http://tundratabloids.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/three-types-of-totalitarian-ideologies.jpg Illwill

            They don’t fall for it as much as they create it to control others. Now, don’t get me wrong, I don’t dislike the jews…but fact remains that they own most of the media in the western countries (including Sweden) and that the only developed country on the planet that they don’t want to be multiculti is…Israel.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “They don’t fall for it as much as they create it to control others.”

            That’s only a little bit subjective, eh? I guess we won’t call you an insane bigot because after all, so many people at stormfront agree with you.

            “I don’t dislike the jews…but fact remains that they own most of the media in the western countries (including Sweden) and that the only developed country on the planet that they don’t want to be multiculti is…Israel.”

            You’ve conflated and confused leftists with “Jews.” This is what bigots and morons do to find a scapegoat to shift attention away from their own impotence and weakness. Rather than finding ways to succeed personally, people often look for conspiracies to explain their own failures.

            This explains the left almost entirely. And it explains fiscally conservative leftists who see themselves as sitting on the right. Losers love to find scapegoats. And the most successful target historically has been to attack the Jews. That’s not proof that the theories are valid. It just shows a pattern that people believe in from generation to generation. Jew hatred is a religion for envious, weak losers.

          • http://tundratabloids.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/three-types-of-totalitarian-ideologies.jpg Illwill

            That’s only a little bit subjective, eh? I guess we won’t call you an insane bigot because after all, so many people at stormfront agree with you.

            So, I am the bigot? I claim the jews are intelligent, you claim they are easily manipulated…and I am the bigot? Wow, you’re a dumbass.

            You’ve conflated and confused leftists with “Jews.” This is what bigots and morons do to find a scapegoat to shift attention away from their own impotence and weakness. Rather than finding ways to succeed
            personally, people often look for conspiracies to explain their own failures.

            Oh, building straw men to win an argument, are we? Well, since you claim that pedophiles are better people than the rest of us, I think you’re a very bad person!

            This explains the left almost entirely. And it explains fiscally conservative leftists who see themselves as sitting on the right. Losers love to find scapegoats. And the most successful target historically has been to attack the Jews. That’s not proof that the theories are
            valid. It just shows a pattern that people believe in from generation to generation. Jew hatred is a religion for envious, weak losers.

            You do realize that I am not a leftist in any way, right? I am not national socialist, socialist or communist. I don’t dislike jews, I don’t believe in fairy tales and I just happened to be a scientist (natural science) that work with jews on a daily basis. What I stated were facts, jews in Sweden own most of our media…it is just retarded to argue against that, since it’s public information. Bonnier and Stampen own a clear majority of the papers and TV-channels and the people behind are of jewish decent. You may not like that, but that’s just the way it is.

            FYI, I dislike all religious people and even though judaism and islam has a lot in common (same as national socialism and communism), islam is by far the worst religion/totalitarian ideology human kind has ever invented. But still, the jews own the media in Sweden and our media makes Fox News seem objective (real, not what you pretend to be) and competent.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “So, I am the bigot? I claim the jews are intelligent, you claim they are easily manipulated…and I am the bigot?”

            Yes.

            Illwill:”They don’t fall for it as much as they create it to control others.”

          • http://tundratabloids.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/three-types-of-totalitarian-ideologies.jpg Illwill

            Yes, I know what I wrote. That’s not the problem. The problem is that you don’t understand what I wrote. But then again, a person that claims that jews are less intelligent and more easily manipulated/fooled than the rest, is hardly someone anyone should listen to…you racist b*stard!

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “The problem is that you don’t understand what I wrote.”

            I understand your collectivism and false racial theories.

            “But then again, a person that claims that jews are less intelligent and more easily manipulated/fooled than the rest, is hardly someone anyone should listen to…you racist b*stard!”

            You’re confused because I never said anything like that. I’m not a racist. I have never said any “genetic group” is superior or inferior to any other because I think it’s nonsense. Some times bogus statistical analysis leads collectivists to develop these bogus racial theories when the comprehensive evidences shows that it’s all about culture.

          • http://tundratabloids.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/three-types-of-totalitarian-ideologies.jpg Illwill

            So, the comprehensive evidences show that, eh? I guess average IQ is purely based on culture? If that is the case, how come Mongolia (dirt poor) has an average IQ on the level of China and Europe while countries with a similar population (but very different countries otherwise) like Bangladesh, Pakistan and India have the same average IQ? How come countries outside of Africa, but with an African population (Jamaica, Haiti etc) have average IQ:s on the level of the African countries?

            You claim that behaviour is a result of culture, I claim that culture is a result of behaviour. If you put a million somalis in a secluded area, they will behave like somalis. If you do the same with chinese, swedes or kurds, their societies will become identical to that of the chinese, swedes or kurds. How can you not know this?

            Every single western country (without exception) has the same exact problem with the same group of people. Arabs, afghans, gypsies, africans…they all behave exactly the same when they come to a western country. Their children behave exactly the same, their cousins behave exactly the same and the reason is quite simple: because that’s what they are. Of course you can train a somali child to behave like a human being, but it will never happen naturally and its IQ will not increase just because it’s treated like a normal human child.

            Is this racism? Yes, absolutely. Is it reality? Yes, absolutely. So, you need to decide whether you plan to live in reality or if you’re going to try to stick to the PC-dream that never has worked and never will work.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “I guess average IQ is purely based on culture?”

            Not “purely” but it is the biggest factor. Genes were thought to be major factors because of the correlation between genetics and culture. People generally raise their kids in the same or similar culture they were raised in themselves.

            “If that is the case, how come Mongolia (dirt poor) has an average IQ on the level of China and Europe while countries with a similar population (but very different countries otherwise) like Bangladesh”

            Because some “dirt poor” cultures are better at raising intelligent kids.

            “How come countries outside of Africa, but with an African population (Jamaica, Haiti etc) have average IQ:s on the level of the African countries?”

            Because most indigenous African cultures rank at the bottom in terms of preparing kids for success in terms of Western IQ test results, and related successes.

            “You claim that behaviour is a result of culture, I claim that culture is a result of behaviour.”

            Culture is partly behavior. Behavior is learned. Culture is what people have learned collectively. I’m sorry if that is too complicated. Don’t bother with quantum physics.

            “If you put a million somalis in a secluded area, they will behave like somalis.”

            Of course, if they get parenting from Somali parents. It’s not geography. It’s culture.

            If you place a million Somali babies in any other culture and break them from Somali culture, they will always behave as the new host culture teaches them to behave. I appreciate you setting me up for such an obvious answer to your challenges.

            “Every single western country (without exception) has the same exact problem with the same group of people. Arabs, afghans, gypsies, africans…they all behave exactly the same when they come to a

            western country.”

            Right: the failure to integrate culturally. Because the parasite culture comes to the host and expects absurd benefits while bringing their destructive cultural baggage with them.

            “Is this racism? Yes, absolutely. Is it reality? Yes, absolutely. So, you need to decide whether you plan to live in reality or if you’re going to try to stick to the PC-dream that never has worked and never will work.”

            I am not suggesting the typical PC dream. I’m just smart enough due to my education to understand the false evidence presented by racists. It’s about culture, not genes. In fact my statements and positions are considered much more controversial to the PC crowd because I claim we can fix it, and we can keep our Western standards. If I’m correct, it’s only logical to ask people to leave their destructive cultures behind if they want to immigrate to the West, and especially to the USA. You think that’s “PC.” LOL.

            I say you are delusional because you want to imagine that the behavior of certain people is somehow evidence that you are genetically superior.

            Dream on.

          • http://tundratabloids.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/three-types-of-totalitarian-ideologies.jpg Illwill

            Now, there have already been reports that the IQ-tests aren’t optimized for white children so I won’t even touch that part. It’s too early to dig up the article, but you can find it at ncbi. I will therefor not discuss that, you simply have no clue what you’re talking about (as usual).

            Gypsies have been in Western Europe for hundreds of years, it doesn’t take that long to drop a culture, even if not by choice. African children in the U.S are far below the curve, and although that can be blamed on how they are treated in the U.S…well, in the U.K it’s different and they are below the curve there as well.

            Culture is partly behavior. Behavior is learned. Culture is what people
            have learned collectively. I’m sorry if that is too complicated. Don’t
            bother with quantum physics.

            Why not? I managed quite well in advanced quantum chemistry, which is essentially the exact same thing. Too complicated? Don’t mistake me for yourself, kid, I have quite a few years at the top schools here…studying both life sciences and technology. Unlike yourself, I know I am better than the rest. ;)

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “Now, there have already been reports that the IQ-tests aren’t optimized for white children so I won’t even touch that part. It’s too early to dig up the article, but you can find it at ncbi. I will therefor not discuss that, you simply have no clue what you’re talking about (as usual).”

            If we assume you know what I’m talking about. That would be foolish. You seem to be making too many assumptions about, well everything here. For example, if we find that on average a certain group tests higher in intelligence, that doesn’t prove culture is not a factor. Even if they “really are” more intelligent. The brain performs better when it’s used. It’s like comparing athletes and deciding that the losers are genetically inferior when it’s almost always a difference in their training regimes. There are maybe correlations between athletic success and genetics, but not to the degree that most people assume. We simply don’t have the data to know how much of your life experiences will prepare you for physical tasks.

            The brain has even less diversity among the people you are testing. Practice may not make perfect, but practice does make for better results physically and mentally, You can’t control for that in your IQ tests so you can’t use them the way that you think you can.

            “Gypsies have been in Western Europe for hundreds of years, it doesn’t take that long to drop a culture, even if not by choice.”

            Your understanding of the topic is way too simple. Even individual families carry and live in subcultures that are carriers of ideas, behaviors and so forth. The fact that some immigrants cling to their ancestral culture to greater degrees than other immigrant groups does nothing to show that it’s truly genetic rather than just culture.

            “Why not? I managed quite well in advanced quantum chemistry, which is essentially the exact same thing. Too complicated? Don’t mistake me for yourself, kid, I have quite a few years at the top schools here…studying both life sciences and technology. Unlike yourself, I know I am better than the rest. ;)”

            Bluffs aside, I know that you are delusional. Culture (and its effects even more so) is far more complicated than what we currently know about anything physical. And you don’t seem to be following this conversation well enough to even understand what I’ve said. Or you’re not trying since after all, you know you’re the best.

            But that’s impossible given what we read already just on this page.

            I hope your elbow heals some day.

          • http://tundratabloids.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/three-types-of-totalitarian-ideologies.jpg Illwill

            It doesn’t prove that culture isn’t a factor, but it doesn’t prove that culture is a factor either…all it proves is that the tests aren’t made to benefit whites (or east asians). Did I, in that part, claim anything different?

            As for genetic differences, well…if you think that all the best sprinters/runners in the world look exactly the same (no matter what country they come from) is pure chance (or “culture”), well…heh…ok then. We know about some of the differences, but of course not all. The way the muscles are built up differ between certain blacks and whites for example, and this is of course genetic. To believe that intelligence isn’t genetic…well, it’s an absurd view since we know it is. Stupid people usually get stupid children, and this is the case even if the kid is adopted. Adopted black children score lower on IQ-tests than adopted east asian children and so on…I guess you already know this.

            Your view on the gypsies isn’t about you understanding the subject better (or at all), it’s just you being certain of your badly supported point and you refusing to listen to reason. That’s fine, it’s your right…but you’re still wrong.

            Bluff aside? Ah, right, you don’t understand what quantum mechanics/physics/chemistry is and just threw the term out to seem intelligent? Well, I guess I should have known that. Too bad for you that some of us actually ARE educated.

            I understand what you’re trying to say, it’s not really difficult to understand the one and only point you have…I am not disagreeing with you because I don’t get what you’re saying, I am disagreeing with you because you’re wrong. Culture is a factor in many things, but when it comes to intelligence it’s not…as long as you understand what intelligence is (i.e. the ability to reason, use logic to solve problems and so on). I guess you’re one of those that think a person is smart if he/she can memorize a lot of things? Americans tend to be like that (“he’s so smart, he was on Jeopardy!).

            As for the elbow-thing…I didn’t get that one. I am not a native English speaker, so please explain, unless it was something incredibly stupid (as I expect, heh). :)

          • objectivefactsmatter

            “Remember, correlation is not causation.”

            But weak superficial correlation is enough for bigots. If only they understood how transparent it is to those who can see the patterns clearly.

        • objectivefactsmatter

          “Hey, if it’s “anti-Semitic” to point out the fact that jews have lead the charge in opening America and Europe to third-world immigration”

          Don’t you mean “whites?” Basically it’s been white leftists doing this. Jews and Christians.

          So you hate whites eh? Who founded the USA? Christians and Jews.

    • Bulan Sabriel

      Stop lying your POS Nazi Swine.
      This video comes from a Israeli piece on Muslim-Socialist persecuation of Malmo Jews. Barabara Erenreich Lerner is the Leftist court Jew plant trotted out to suppress Swedish Jews and silence them. She is not even a Swedish Jew. She is an American leftist, who considered Israel too nationalist and betrayed her own people by being a spokeswoman for the anti-Zionist left in Sweden.

      You Nazis ignore the facts and trot out an edited clip.

      Show yourself to bea man and not an untermensch. Stop hiding behind lies. Debate me like a man, and not a troll saddled with a lower IQ and defective inbred genes.

    • ObamaYoMoma

      That lady is a loon. Multiculturalism and Diversity are junk science, just like Global Warming.

  • DK

    The cultural problems in Sweden and other European countries is really part of the spiritual warfare. Humanism and mohamidism are both satanic movements, that are philosophically diametrically opposed but still have a common enemy Jesus Christ. Europeans are blind to mohamidisms faults as long as they are against Christianity. Mohamidists are not blind, but are willing to accept one dhimmi to battle against another, temporarily. Now that mos are gaining strength they are willing to challenge the current governments using false victim extortion and intimidation. This is the pattern in much of Europe and since those methods are working, their application will increase. The reticence of the press and the governments to recognize they are under attack and actually aid the attackers
    will only encourage and increase those attacks. It is interesting that the liberal press is so pro-despot philosophy aiding the anti-liberal (progressive?) invasion just to battle against the remnants of Christians who have already been defeated. That remnant being smaller than the invading momanidists. The reason still being they serve the same god.

    • Drakken

      You haven’t seen the Euros stand up and fight yet, but they will by necessity. The govts there are so fearful of backlash by the natives they are doing everything in their power to stop it. The muzzys will continue to push because they can and there are no repercussions, but those days are about to end once a group or an individual protects his/her place of business, house, car with deadly force. Once one person protects themselves, others will follow. Welcome to the new Balkans Europe, your natives are not going to forget the treachery inflicted upon them by govt bureaucrats.

    • Edohiguma

      What the leftwing “elites” in Europe throw around is NOT humanism. Absolutely not.

      It’s anti-humanism.

      They cater not only to immigrants who refuse to follow the rules and rather lock themselves away into ghettos than learn the local languages.

      They also cater to criminals.

      In Germany, a pedophile gets 5 years max, no matter how many children he violates. There a murderer is free after 25 years, locking him up longer (into a special high security lockup which some other countries have as well), can’t be done, because according to the EU human rights court that violates the criminal’s human rights (legal precedence exists, a German murderer went to that kangaroo court and won.)

      Oh, that Breivik fellow? He will be out after 20 years for exactly that reason and I’ve seen some Norwegian politicians pointing fingers at Japan (they have the death penalty still) and playing moral high ground.

      In Austria criminals, if they’re making progress with therapy, can get leave from prison. That includes rapists and pedos. So happened in Vienna a few years ago. A guy who was on leave from prison (he was in for raping a 7 year old girl) raped another 6 year old girl. What did he get? 6 years in a special facility for criminals with mental health problems. The victims? Uh… who cares about them? The elites hate victims and love criminals.

      None of that has anything to do with a humanist approach. It’s deeply anti-humane.

      Also don’t confuse the elites with the people. The natives in Europe are getting restless. Groups like the EDL have been springing up in many countries. The EDL is no real solution, of course, but it shows how pissed off people are by now.

  • herb benty

    Islam is Evil. Leftism, socialism, communism/marxism, Liberalism is the sponsor of this evil in our country and the Right has to take over our country again to purify our nation from this evil. LOOK what happens to the Evolutionary/Atheistic lefties who abandon God (who loves them), and embrace Islam ( who hates them). They are like a ship with no rudder. THAT is what is “leading” America today.

    • Nulle_utan_prickar

      You argue just like an fanatic islamist, or a mirror of it on the other side of the fence. The same contempt for the natural sciences, evolution and reason.The same blind faith and the same preferences: a silly and stupid old book over empirism, logic and reason.

      • herb benty

        Nulle! I come from such Bible beleivers as Newton, Mendel, Pasteur, etc., etc. Circular reasoning is evolution, such as..the age of the rock is determined by the type of fossils in it and the age of the fossils are determined by the type of rock its found in.. now that is circular! If you really want to look at the creationist side, http://www.icr.org is full of facts from Nobel Prize winning and other Ph.Ds who show in laymans terms that evolution is not new or truthful.

      • objectivefactsmatter

        “The same blind faith in an arbitrary old book full of self-contradictive and circular “reasoning”.”

        Is that your scientific conclusion about the Bible? Go find your own mirror to see the hypocrite. You have no clue till now.

        The dictionary is fully of contradictory words too. Throw yours away and go live in a cave. Then you can rant all you want about how superior you are because you play for the smart team of elite scientists. You got a B+ once on a science quiz so you can’t be wrong about anything.

  • http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/ Jason P

    Bruce: “why ordinarily sensible journals such as the National Review, Weekly Standard, and Spectator would choose to publish such patently misguided “explanations” of Stockholm’s recent unpleasantness …”

    Bruce, the answer is simple. It is because they are conservatives. Conservatives have a soft spot for religion–any religion. They just don’t get Islam.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      “”In other words, our form of government has no sense unless it is founded in a deeply felt religious faith, and I don’t care what it is.” Eisenhower, 1952″

      Contemporary conservatives can be very superficial about things. The “I don’t care what it is…” sentiment probably grew out of a sense of guilt about what happened to so many Jews. Basically the efforts to tone down religious contention allowed the jihadis to sneak in as victims while some even on the right were asleep about what was happening. I guess many still are.

  • thetaftscholar

    SCATHING! Read the last paragraph, at minimum. Brilliant!

  • William James Ward

    Strange isn’t it that the destructive forces of Islam are portrayed as
    unknown forces in a world of imbiciles, makes one wonder what has
    the minds of the idiots of denial so clouded, could it be thier evil
    hearts, forsaking true God and true Faith for falsehood………..William

  • Edohiguma

    Sweden has a long history and culture. But for the “elites” loving your country, your history or your culture is equivalent to eating babies. It’s not just in Sweden, it’s like that across Europe.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      “Sweden has a long history and culture. But for the “elites” loving your country, your history or your culture is equivalent to eating babies. It’s not just in Sweden, it’s like that across Europe, and, from what I’ve seen, the natives are getting restless. They’re beginning to tire of lies such as this article. Let’s hope it’s not too late.”

      Many countries and cultures responded to the revelations about the Nazis by downplaying nationalist sentiments and pride in culture.

      Then what happens? Jihad. While the watchman on the wall was crying about their own collective past crimes, the bigger criminal (who conspired with the most recent historical criminals: Nazis) got past.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      “PS. Why do you think Japan or South Korea don’t have such problems? Because they don’t let every goat herder into the country and then give him a lot of money for doing nothing. There you have to earn it. It’s sink or swim, unlike in Europe where the unwilling are catered to and defended and those who work hard get shafted by the “elites”.”

      The difference between diversity and “multiculturalism” in practice is what led Westerners to think they have to adapt to the foreigners. No matter what.

      Wrong. The melting pot works, Multiculturalism as it’s defined and practiced today is suicidal.

      By the way, many Westerners live in Japan after successfully adopting enough of the Japanese culture to get along. I’m sure anyone else willing to do that would be fine. Just don’t expect to be coddled when you arrive the way Western governments do today.

      I’ve heard the same about Korea but don’t know enough to comment.

  • Kukye

    This article is a joke, quoting from liars with sub-culture beliefs anyone can smell a mile away. Soldiers say the people stink in the ME.

  • http://www.multiurl.com/l/elb Neevropských Kukačky

    I’m on Bawers side, but this is not true:

    “What Sanandaji chose not to point out was that the politician who made that statement, Mona Sahlin, made it while addressing an audience of Muslims in a mosque; and she didn’t say that Swedes were jealous of immigrants generally – she said that they were jealous of Muslims, because Islamic culture is wonderful and manifestly superior to Swedish culture.”

    She said it in an interview with Euroturk, as it seems, in her own office.

    http://ligator.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/intervju_3.pdf

    • knowshistory

      there it is! the solution to the problem. islamic culture is wonderful and superior to swedish culture. so stop torturing those poor muslims by exposing them to inferior swedish culture, and stop inciting jealousy in those inferior swedes. just send the superior muslims back to their superior country of origin, and let those inferior swedes languish in their inferior country. a win-win situation.

      • http://www.multiurl.com/l/elb Neevropských Kukačky

        Did you misintepret me?

        I don’t want massimmigration, and especially not of muslims, i was just pointing out a factual error.

        And i know, cause its me who has documented Mona Sahlins antiswedish hate on Wikiquote, when all PC idiots were denying she ever said it.

  • Willy Rho

    Allowing Muslims into ones country that is not Muslim is
    like drinking Poison. It will kill the Host, and the Morons that allow it
    will cause Western Civilization to be overthrown by the Antithesis of Liberty
    and Justice; a Muerduering 7th Century Satanic Religion.

  • Anti Islam

    SWEDISH ELITES NEED TO WAKE THE HELL UP ALREADY!!!! The assimilation of Muslims into a peaceful, harmonious existence with non-Muslims will NEVER WORK!!! 99% of all Muslims that come to Sweden as a gracious gift of Asylum for a chance at a better life don’t even make attempts at learning the Swedish language, culture, customs, peaceful way of life etc. They don’t work and most of them don’t even make any attempts to find any work or learn the language -even after many years of living there they still just freeload off the Welfare system. This is SO Wrong and such a tragedy and disgrace for the Native Swedes. Swedes all throughout the country are getting EXTREMELY angered by the enormous influx of Muslim Immigrants over the past 25 years or so. Muslims come from a violent, non-peaceful, hateful, oppressive culture/background and bring it with them wherever they go -it is “ingrained’ into their very genes to be violent criminals, rapists, and murderers with no regard for others or for authority. Muslims do not like to play by the rules of Law that ensure a peaceful society.

    Muslims are like a cancer that will kill something from the inside-out. For all the great and wonderful achievements, successes, and victories Sweden has had throughout it’s history as a glorious nation, the ONLY ONE fault that will bring it’s total demise sooner than later is the one of opening up the “floodgates” to Muslims. This is the horrible consequence of allowing huge numbers of Muslims to flood into the country year after year, and the number grows exponentially.
    Our Swedish forefathers would be so ashamed and disappointed in how our current Swedish beurocrats have allowed this to happen. Our very country is at severe risk of becoming the Islamic Republic of Sweden unless Muslim immigration comes to an abrupt halt VERY soon. This is quickly becoming such a terrible tragedy and travesty. It’s time to shut the gates to all Muslims. Jimmie Akesson needs to be in charge of Sweden now!!!!! VOTE AKESSON in upcoming elections to ensure your Sweden will remain Sweden as the way it was always intended to be. No more Muslim immigration. Enough is enough.

  • sunnyman6

    I totally agree. The situation is absurd, muslim “refugees” keep pouring in, but more than 90 % of them are fakes. They are not refugees in the proper sense at all, they present fake stories to the authorities, the don’t show any proofs of identity — and yet they DO get permanent residency! THis is all due to the Leftists, who have infiltrated the country and especially dominate the media. If you challenge this state of affairs, you get branded by these leftists as “islamophobic” or even “racist”. Therefore, many people don’t even dare to speak up about this madness. It is like a Communist country, like old DDR or North Korea.

  • ddayperspective

    The old parties in the Swedish Parliament behaves as traitors against the citizens of Sweden. The case against ethnic Swedes and people with other roots that have Swedish citizenship or permanent residence. Almost all Swedish journalists controlled by leftist ideology and political correctness. Those of them who would like to respond truthfully to the riots in Sweden (which we have only seen the beginning of) is too scared to show more than loyalty with media editorial lines and the prevailing policy. What freedom men and women who are committed to the truth of reality comes back and that Sweden is rescued from destruction by continued mass importation of people dependent on benefits from outside Europe, the Sweden Democrats reach an unlikely landslide victory by a growing number of “wake up” to the elections in September 2014 , which has already proven to be the case with both ethnic Swedes among immigrants, including Muslims. The old parties are trying to hide their huge mistake and betrayal of the people of Sweden by pointing out the Sweden Democrats as “xenophobic”, “racists” even as “Nazis”, which is absolutely no match with the truth! They are simply terrified of the people’s harsh judgment in choosing who will and in the future.

    What they did not expect is that neither journalists, officials of various government agencies or even MPs used as a “button pusher”, and that secrecy will be used to protest vote for SD or conviction. Already under a significant “pivot” from both the Conservatives and the Social Democrats, also one or two Left Party (Communist) wakes up … Every sound thinking person realizes what is happening and understand that unless future and the lives of our children and grandchildren to become veritable hell and totally devastated, MUST madness policies expire! Sweden Democrats is that the Social Democrats were formerly under Prime Minister Tage Erlander’s time and before, ie conservative value! We hope that the democratic world prays for Sweden in September 2014 … If the Sweden Democrats succeed then, will our country go under, and forever changing … Islam is the threat from within that must be fought by all means in all countries whose citizens want democracy and an elected parliamentary government and the media understands its role and responsibility to the people!

  • $3924879

    That’s easy. Opposing Islam is something the Sweden Democrats are known to do, and since the SD are ostracized by the Swedish establishment as the epitome of evil, you can’t utter anything that can even be remotely in agreement with SD ideology, or you’ll risk being publicly branded as an SD supporter and thus an evil islamophobic racist fascist, which for people in the media, politics or government will most likely result in you losing your job, being expelled from your labor union, as well as being ostracized by most of your friends. And that’s on a good day, on a bad day you might be subject of threats to your life, violent street attacks, vandalism of your home, and/or someone setting your home on fire.

    The Swedish elites have all been imperative in creating this climate of ostracism. The SD and their supporters are branded as pure evil, and thus fair game to attack in any way possible, while the media and the police look the other way. In Sweden, if you do not support unlimited immigration to the Swedish welfare state, paid for by hard-working native swedes, or if you do not support multiculturalism (or even worse, that some cultures are actually superior to others), or if you do not wholeheartedly support Islam to take its “rightful place” in Swedish society e.g. by building mosques and yelling out their battle cry (sorry, I meant the call to prayer) from every minaret, you are branded an evil Islamophobic racist fascist nazi, and most people in your social environment will simply cut their ties to you and tell you never to speak to them again.

    This is splintering society and even families, where family members who admit to voting for the wrong party might very well be ostracized by their own parents or children. I even recall one instance where a mother went to the tabloid press to cry out how her evil son had admitted to voting for the Sweden Democrats, which the tabloids jumped on like pigs on truffles.

    Sweden is a sick country today.

  • http://www.multiurl.com/l/elb Neevropských Kukačky

    I know nothing about her, but i think her name is Barbara Spectre.

    • Bulan Sabriel

      Barbar Lerner Spectre. Sorry. I got her mixed up with another commie.

  • Resignerad

    “the Islamic doctrine of jihad simply have no place on their radar screen” True, and the reason for this is mainly that connecting the riots with islam would – in Sweden – be heresy. For some reason, you can not publicly critisize political islam in Sweden. It is as impossible as it would have been to blame economic problems on the communist system in the Soviet Union. You would soon find yourself out of job, out of friends and subject to public slander.

  • http://www.aktualia.wordpress.com/julia-caesar Cavatus

    I am Swedish and I can testify that this is exactly how it is in Sweden. Sweden is actually a stealth fascist country since not all views are accepted anylonger and those who hold this other opinion (that immigration must be restricted now) are free targets for attacks of any kind, both verbal and other.