<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hating Jews: A Global Study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hating-jews-a-global-study</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: TALIA</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5258141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TALIA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5258141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it is spiritual.
 It doesnt matter where we are or what are, our life conditions what we do or dont do....even in nations that have no jews at all....jews always get blamed for the worlds problems.
So it is supernatural. It is something that is engraved in the psyche of all nations-and all nations get the chance in their turn .....
The real question is why??
What is humanity waiting for from the Jews that they are not getting?
Besides monotheism which was giving by the Jews there are also numerous contributions to all fields and walks of life and still it is not enough or not what the world needs from us.
So for me the real question as a jew and israeli is what is it? what is it that we are supposed to do? what exactly it means? chosen people...chosen to do what?
 Personally i think we are maybe supposed to have the answer , the way to help the world..how do we as humanity succeed in living together ? 
The world is coming undone everywhere and i think the turning point -what ever it might be- will include if not start even in Israel.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is spiritual.<br />
 It doesnt matter where we are or what are, our life conditions what we do or dont do&#8230;.even in nations that have no jews at all&#8230;.jews always get blamed for the worlds problems.<br />
So it is supernatural. It is something that is engraved in the psyche of all nations-and all nations get the chance in their turn &#8230;..<br />
The real question is why??<br />
What is humanity waiting for from the Jews that they are not getting?<br />
Besides monotheism which was giving by the Jews there are also numerous contributions to all fields and walks of life and still it is not enough or not what the world needs from us.<br />
So for me the real question as a jew and israeli is what is it? what is it that we are supposed to do? what exactly it means? chosen people&#8230;chosen to do what?<br />
 Personally i think we are maybe supposed to have the answer , the way to help the world..how do we as humanity succeed in living together ?<br />
The world is coming undone everywhere and i think the turning point -what ever it might be- will include if not start even in Israel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KT Shamim</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5258056</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KT Shamim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5258056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, actually I don&#039;t believe that at all. There is no abrogation between the Qur&#039;anic verses.

Here is the verse that is used to support the abrogation argument:

[Qur&#039;an 2:107] &quot;Whatever Sign We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, We bring one better than that or the like thereof. Dost thou not know that Allah has the power to do all that He wills?&quot;

Some scholars say this refers to the Quranic verses. But that is not true simply by looking at the verse before:

[Qur&#039;an 2:106] &quot;They who disbelieve from among the People of the Book, or from among those who associate gods with Allah, desire not that any good should be sent down to you from your Lord; but Allah chooses for His mercy whomsoever He pleases; and Allah is of exceeding bounty.&quot;

Clearly then the verse 107 refers to the earlier books and how Quranic verses abrogate the earlier books. On the other hand it is clearly written:

[Qur&#039;an 15:10] &quot;Verily, We Ourself have sent down this Exhortation, and most surely We will be its Guardian.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, actually I don&#8217;t believe that at all. There is no abrogation between the Qur&#8217;anic verses.</p>
<p>Here is the verse that is used to support the abrogation argument:</p>
<p>[Qur'an 2:107] &#8220;Whatever Sign We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, We bring one better than that or the like thereof. Dost thou not know that Allah has the power to do all that He wills?&#8221;</p>
<p>Some scholars say this refers to the Quranic verses. But that is not true simply by looking at the verse before:</p>
<p>[Qur'an 2:106] &#8220;They who disbelieve from among the People of the Book, or from among those who associate gods with Allah, desire not that any good should be sent down to you from your Lord; but Allah chooses for His mercy whomsoever He pleases; and Allah is of exceeding bounty.&#8221;</p>
<p>Clearly then the verse 107 refers to the earlier books and how Quranic verses abrogate the earlier books. On the other hand it is clearly written:</p>
<p>[Qur'an 15:10] &#8220;Verily, We Ourself have sent down this Exhortation, and most surely We will be its Guardian.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aquataine</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5257996</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aquataine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5257996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not registered with any party, am a Deist and Zionist.  We are not controlled by Jews.  I am so sick of this foolish bs. Read the VALID facts about who owns what in the USA!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not registered with any party, am a Deist and Zionist.  We are not controlled by Jews.  I am so sick of this foolish bs. Read the VALID facts about who owns what in the USA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aquataine</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5257994</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aquataine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5257994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Again, the later verses of the Sword supercede these earlier verses and you know it.  This is a simple fact supported by all renown Islamic scholars.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, the later verses of the Sword supercede these earlier verses and you know it.  This is a simple fact supported by all renown Islamic scholars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aquataine</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5257992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aquataine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5257992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The later verses supersede the earlier ones; your claim is bogus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The later verses supersede the earlier ones; your claim is bogus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Eboch</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5257368</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Eboch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 06:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5257368</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is hard to ignore that Zionism is a threat to the possible destruction of the entire world. Especially the way they control the US army. All it will take is for the Americans to make a mistake and vote in a NEOCON and the world can be destroyed in WW3. All the republicans are controlled by the Israel lobby to. I hope that countries like Russia are keeping an eye on this. I believe the only leader in the world who can stand up to the Zionist in America and Israel is  Vladmir Putin.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is hard to ignore that Zionism is a threat to the possible destruction of the entire world. Especially the way they control the US army. All it will take is for the Americans to make a mistake and vote in a NEOCON and the world can be destroyed in WW3. All the republicans are controlled by the Israel lobby to. I hope that countries like Russia are keeping an eye on this. I believe the only leader in the world who can stand up to the Zionist in America and Israel is  Vladmir Putin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Eboch</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5257363</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Eboch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 06:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5257363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Jews were treated poorly in WW2 but so were poles, gypsies, Catholics, many people but it just seems Jews profited off of it. Why didn&#039;t all the victims? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Jews were treated poorly in WW2 but so were poles, gypsies, Catholics, many people but it just seems Jews profited off of it. Why didn&#8217;t all the victims? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Eboch</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5257362</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Eboch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Aug 2013 06:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5257362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Muslims really are the victims.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muslims really are the victims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herb benty</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5256808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[herb benty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5256808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Gary! Ya......just had Enough of &quot;anti-semitism&quot;, want the world to be  &quot;anti-&quot; something that is actually a threat. Anti-muslim fanatic, anti- murderer, anti- marxist professor. Will look into the video, Luv in Jesus.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gary! Ya&#8230;&#8230;just had Enough of &#8220;anti-semitism&#8221;, want the world to be  &#8220;anti-&#8221; something that is actually a threat. Anti-muslim fanatic, anti- murderer, anti- marxist professor. Will look into the video, Luv in Jesus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Dickson</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5256652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Dickson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2013 01:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5256652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Herb, I agree with your conclusion. If you haven&#039;t already seen this, here&#039;s a commentary by Dr. Michael L. Brown (a Messianic Jew) that provides exactly the same conclusion:
http://www.realmessiah.com/watch/anti-semitism 



As for myself, a Messianic Gentile, I conclude that the most hated people in the world are Messianic Jews.


I bless them daily and plead with God for their safety and effectiveness in bringing God&#039;s blessings and righteousness to the world.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Herb, I agree with your conclusion. If you haven&#8217;t already seen this, here&#8217;s a commentary by Dr. Michael L. Brown (a Messianic Jew) that provides exactly the same conclusion:<br />
<a href="http://www.realmessiah.com/watch/anti-semitism" rel="nofollow">http://www.realmessiah.com/watch/anti-semitism</a> </p>
<p>As for myself, a Messianic Gentile, I conclude that the most hated people in the world are Messianic Jews.</p>
<p>I bless them daily and plead with God for their safety and effectiveness in bringing God&#8217;s blessings and righteousness to the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KT Shamim</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5256098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KT Shamim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 06:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5256098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Qur&#039;an 109:1-7]
In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful.
Say, ‘O ye disbelievers!
‘I worship not that which you worship;
‘Nor worship you what I worship.
‘And I am not going to worship that which you worship;
‘Nor will you worship what I worship.
‘For you your religion, and for me my religion.’



I&#039;ll keep responding to you as far as Discus is concerned. Your choice not to respond is your choice. And yes, still no answer to my pinpoint queries.


Thank you for your time.


&quot;Love for All; Hatred for None&quot; - Official Motto of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Qur'an 109:1-7]<br />
In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful.<br />
Say, ‘O ye disbelievers!<br />
‘I worship not that which you worship;<br />
‘Nor worship you what I worship.<br />
‘And I am not going to worship that which you worship;<br />
‘Nor will you worship what I worship.<br />
‘For you your religion, and for me my religion.’</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll keep responding to you as far as Discus is concerned. Your choice not to respond is your choice. And yes, still no answer to my pinpoint queries.</p>
<p>Thank you for your time.</p>
<p>&#8220;Love for All; Hatred for None&#8221; &#8211; Official Motto of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackdiamond</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5256052</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jackdiamond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 03:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5256052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Listen, you delusional little stalker.  I&#039;m not here to be dictated to by you what I&#039;ll discuss.  Your routine that nothing I say is Islam because you, little you with an Islam of your own invention, say so, has worn out its welcome.   You have nothing, nothing to refute what I have presented concerning either the mission of Islam, it&#039;s view of Jews and Christians, its view of apostasy, it&#039;s notion of warfare, it&#039;s principle of loyalty and enmity, its inherent cruelty and hatred.  The hate that burns at the core of your Qur&#039;an and your prophet. With 15 centuries of experience to back that up and all the headlines of today to add an exclamation point. Your dismissal of Islam&#039;s most revered scholars is like your extremely poor knowledge of history. You don&#039;t own up to anything, not the history of Islam, the rivers of blood, the tyranny, the destruction--no you just go on and on that there is no compulsion and Islam spread with love, you have no response to its vile conquest by the sword, you just go on about Indonesia, as if you win the argument. I prove that Hijra (migration) is just another form of Jihad initiated by Muhammad, and you have no response. You don&#039;t own up to the genocidal Jihad (hundreds of millions of lives taken), to the despotism of Shari&#039;a, to the apartheid of the Islamic State, to the status and treatment of non-Muslims in Muslim lands (the human misery engendered by Islam), to the centuries of punishment for apostasy and blasphemy which originate with your prophet and his &quot;rightly guided companions.&quot; To the abrogation by Islam of Judaism and and Christianity, of the Bible by the Qur&#039;an, of Jesus and the Jewish patriarchs by Muhammad, to the very claim of Jews or Christians to the holy land itself or their own scriptures.  Muhammad began his career as a thief and only continued it.  Islam is a thief.

You&#039;re a knave.  All you can do is repeat dumbly, this is not Islam, this is not Islam. &quot;Look at this verse from the Qur&#039;an!&quot; ignoring a hundred others that say something different.  After ignoring 90% of what I&#039;ve written on these threads you dare accuse me of ignoring some point you think you&#039;ve made.  Let me sum it up:  Muhammad initiated the hostilities with the Meccans and the Jews.  They rejected him as the prophet he thought he was.  For the Meccans he began raiding their caravans, like a brigand. They depended on the caravans for their lives, attacking them was a serious matter. The Jews rejected his (absurd) claim to be their prophet.  They even mocked him. For this they earned his (and therefore all Muslims&#039;) eternal hatred.  His record with the Jews is one of murder, treachery, rape, and stolen plunder.  There is even a chapter of the Qur&#039;an called &quot;Spoils of War.&quot;  Booty, raids, and dealing in slaves, that&#039;s how the prophet of God funded his army.  These are cold hard facts.
Consider yourself ignored from here on out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen, you delusional little stalker.  I&#8217;m not here to be dictated to by you what I&#8217;ll discuss.  Your routine that nothing I say is Islam because you, little you with an Islam of your own invention, say so, has worn out its welcome.   You have nothing, nothing to refute what I have presented concerning either the mission of Islam, it&#8217;s view of Jews and Christians, its view of apostasy, it&#8217;s notion of warfare, it&#8217;s principle of loyalty and enmity, its inherent cruelty and hatred.  The hate that burns at the core of your Qur&#8217;an and your prophet. With 15 centuries of experience to back that up and all the headlines of today to add an exclamation point. Your dismissal of Islam&#8217;s most revered scholars is like your extremely poor knowledge of history. You don&#8217;t own up to anything, not the history of Islam, the rivers of blood, the tyranny, the destruction&#8211;no you just go on and on that there is no compulsion and Islam spread with love, you have no response to its vile conquest by the sword, you just go on about Indonesia, as if you win the argument. I prove that Hijra (migration) is just another form of Jihad initiated by Muhammad, and you have no response. You don&#8217;t own up to the genocidal Jihad (hundreds of millions of lives taken), to the despotism of Shari&#8217;a, to the apartheid of the Islamic State, to the status and treatment of non-Muslims in Muslim lands (the human misery engendered by Islam), to the centuries of punishment for apostasy and blasphemy which originate with your prophet and his &#8220;rightly guided companions.&#8221; To the abrogation by Islam of Judaism and and Christianity, of the Bible by the Qur&#8217;an, of Jesus and the Jewish patriarchs by Muhammad, to the very claim of Jews or Christians to the holy land itself or their own scriptures.  Muhammad began his career as a thief and only continued it.  Islam is a thief.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re a knave.  All you can do is repeat dumbly, this is not Islam, this is not Islam. &#8220;Look at this verse from the Qur&#8217;an!&#8221; ignoring a hundred others that say something different.  After ignoring 90% of what I&#8217;ve written on these threads you dare accuse me of ignoring some point you think you&#8217;ve made.  Let me sum it up:  Muhammad initiated the hostilities with the Meccans and the Jews.  They rejected him as the prophet he thought he was.  For the Meccans he began raiding their caravans, like a brigand. They depended on the caravans for their lives, attacking them was a serious matter. The Jews rejected his (absurd) claim to be their prophet.  They even mocked him. For this they earned his (and therefore all Muslims&#8217;) eternal hatred.  His record with the Jews is one of murder, treachery, rape, and stolen plunder.  There is even a chapter of the Qur&#8217;an called &#8220;Spoils of War.&#8221;  Booty, raids, and dealing in slaves, that&#8217;s how the prophet of God funded his army.  These are cold hard facts.<br />
Consider yourself ignored from here on out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackdiamond</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5256050</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jackdiamond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 03:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5256050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Listen, you delusional little stalker.  I&#039;m not here to be dictated to by you what I&#039;ll discuss.  Your routine that nothing I say is Islam because you, little you with an Islam of your own invention, say so, has worn out its welcome.   You have nothing, nothing to refute what I have presented concerning either the mission of Islam, it&#039;s view of Jews and Christians, its view of apostasy, it&#039;s notion of warfare, it&#039;s principle of loyalty and enmity, its inherent cruelty and hatred.  The hate that burns at the core of your Qur&#039;an and your prophet. With 15 centuries of experience to back that up and all the headlines of today to add an exclamation point. Your dismissal of Islam&#039;s most revered scholars is like your extremely poor knowledge of history. You don&#039;t own up to anything, not the history of Islam, the rivers of blood, the tyranny, the destruction--no you just go on and on that there is no compulsion and Islam spread with love, you have no response to vile conquest by the sword, you just went on about Indonesia, as if you win the argument. I prove that Hijra (migration) is just another form of Jihad initiated by Muhammad, and you have no response. You don&#039;t own up to the genocidal Jihad, to the despotism of Shari&#039;a, to the apartheid of the Islamic State, to the status and treatment of non-Muslims in Muslim lands, to the centuries of punishment for apostasy and blasphemy which originate with your prophet and his &quot;rightly guided companions.&quot; To the abrogation by Islam of Judaism and Christianity, of the Bible by the Qur&#039;an, of Jesus and the Jewish patriarchs by Muhammad, to the claim of Jews or Christians to the holy land or even their own scriptures.  Muhammad began his career as a thief and only continued it.  Islam is a theft.
You&#039;re a knave.  All you can do is repeat dumbly, this is not Islam, this is not Islam. Look at my verse from the Qur&#039;an. Ignore a hundred others that say something different.  After ignoring 90% of what I&#039;ve written on these threads you dare accuse me of ignoring some point you think you&#039;ve made.  Let me sum it up:  Muhammad initiated the hostilities with the Meccans and the Jews.  They rejected him as the prophet he thought he was.  For the Meccans he began raiding their caravans, like a brigand. They depended on the caravans for their lives, attacking them was a serious matter. The Jews rejected his (absurd) claim to be their prophet.  They even mocked him. For this they earned his (and therefore all Muslims&#039;) eternal hatred.  His record with the Jews is one of murder, treachery, rape, and stolen plunder.  There is even a chapter of the Qur&#039;an called &quot;Spoils of War.&quot;  Booty, raids, and dealing in slaves, that&#039;s how the prophet of God funded his army.  These are cold hard facts.  
Consider yourself ignored from here on out.,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listen, you delusional little stalker.  I&#8217;m not here to be dictated to by you what I&#8217;ll discuss.  Your routine that nothing I say is Islam because you, little you with an Islam of your own invention, say so, has worn out its welcome.   You have nothing, nothing to refute what I have presented concerning either the mission of Islam, it&#8217;s view of Jews and Christians, its view of apostasy, it&#8217;s notion of warfare, it&#8217;s principle of loyalty and enmity, its inherent cruelty and hatred.  The hate that burns at the core of your Qur&#8217;an and your prophet. With 15 centuries of experience to back that up and all the headlines of today to add an exclamation point. Your dismissal of Islam&#8217;s most revered scholars is like your extremely poor knowledge of history. You don&#8217;t own up to anything, not the history of Islam, the rivers of blood, the tyranny, the destruction&#8211;no you just go on and on that there is no compulsion and Islam spread with love, you have no response to vile conquest by the sword, you just went on about Indonesia, as if you win the argument. I prove that Hijra (migration) is just another form of Jihad initiated by Muhammad, and you have no response. You don&#8217;t own up to the genocidal Jihad, to the despotism of Shari&#8217;a, to the apartheid of the Islamic State, to the status and treatment of non-Muslims in Muslim lands, to the centuries of punishment for apostasy and blasphemy which originate with your prophet and his &#8220;rightly guided companions.&#8221; To the abrogation by Islam of Judaism and Christianity, of the Bible by the Qur&#8217;an, of Jesus and the Jewish patriarchs by Muhammad, to the claim of Jews or Christians to the holy land or even their own scriptures.  Muhammad began his career as a thief and only continued it.  Islam is a theft.<br />
You&#8217;re a knave.  All you can do is repeat dumbly, this is not Islam, this is not Islam. Look at my verse from the Qur&#8217;an. Ignore a hundred others that say something different.  After ignoring 90% of what I&#8217;ve written on these threads you dare accuse me of ignoring some point you think you&#8217;ve made.  Let me sum it up:  Muhammad initiated the hostilities with the Meccans and the Jews.  They rejected him as the prophet he thought he was.  For the Meccans he began raiding their caravans, like a brigand. They depended on the caravans for their lives, attacking them was a serious matter. The Jews rejected his (absurd) claim to be their prophet.  They even mocked him. For this they earned his (and therefore all Muslims&#8217;) eternal hatred.  His record with the Jews is one of murder, treachery, rape, and stolen plunder.  There is even a chapter of the Qur&#8217;an called &#8220;Spoils of War.&#8221;  Booty, raids, and dealing in slaves, that&#8217;s how the prophet of God funded his army.  These are cold hard facts.<br />
Consider yourself ignored from here on out.,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KT Shamim</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5256035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KT Shamim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 02:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5256035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meccan general amnesty argument - no comments from you

Why you give so much importance to non-unanimous medieval interpretations that were written decades if not centuries after Islam was revealed - no comments from you

Why you forgot to quote &quot;disorder in the land&quot; - weak comment from you that you mistranslated it based also, again, on medieval interpretations

And not to mention your repeated out-of-context-ualization of Qur&#039;anic verses. For example:

I can&#039;t believe you quoted 22:39 and again forgot to quote 22:40 which clearly outlines all those conditions that I have repeatedly stated and makes it completely clear that &quot;war&quot; means not any physical aggression but very harsh physical aggression:

[Qur&#039;an 22:40-41] &quot;Permission to fight is given to those against whom war is made, because they have been wronged — and Allah indeed has power to help them —

Those who have been driven out from their homes unjustly only because they said, ‘Our Lord is Allah’ — And if Allah did not repel some men by means of others, there would surely have been pulled down cloisters and churches and synagogues and mosques, wherein the name of Allah is oft commemorated. And Allah will surely help one who helps Him. Allah is indeed Powerful, Mighty —&quot;

Condition 1: Wronged
Condition 2: Driven out from homes
Condition 3: Because they said &#039;Our Lord is Allah&#039;

How many questions will you ignore?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meccan general amnesty argument &#8211; no comments from you</p>
<p>Why you give so much importance to non-unanimous medieval interpretations that were written decades if not centuries after Islam was revealed &#8211; no comments from you</p>
<p>Why you forgot to quote &#8220;disorder in the land&#8221; &#8211; weak comment from you that you mistranslated it based also, again, on medieval interpretations</p>
<p>And not to mention your repeated out-of-context-ualization of Qur&#8217;anic verses. For example:</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe you quoted 22:39 and again forgot to quote 22:40 which clearly outlines all those conditions that I have repeatedly stated and makes it completely clear that &#8220;war&#8221; means not any physical aggression but very harsh physical aggression:</p>
<p>[Qur'an 22:40-41] &#8220;Permission to fight is given to those against whom war is made, because they have been wronged — and Allah indeed has power to help them —</p>
<p>Those who have been driven out from their homes unjustly only because they said, ‘Our Lord is Allah’ — And if Allah did not repel some men by means of others, there would surely have been pulled down cloisters and churches and synagogues and mosques, wherein the name of Allah is oft commemorated. And Allah will surely help one who helps Him. Allah is indeed Powerful, Mighty —&#8221;</p>
<p>Condition 1: Wronged<br />
Condition 2: Driven out from homes<br />
Condition 3: Because they said &#8216;Our Lord is Allah&#8217;</p>
<p>How many questions will you ignore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackdiamond</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5256006</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jackdiamond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 01:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5256006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are the punishments for &quot;disorder in the land&quot;...&quot;they should be murdered or crucified or their hands &amp; feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned.&quot;  No I don&#039;t think &quot;striving to create disorder&quot; calls for death and dismemberment.  Now, what does the Qur&#039;an mean?  &quot;who slays a soul not to retaliate for a soul slain, nor for corruption in the land...&quot; is also translated as &quot;manslaughter or mischief in the 
land.&quot;  It is also used synonymously with &quot;waging war against Allah&quot; as in Ibn Kathir&#039;s tafsir on 5:33:  &quot;the punishment of those who wage war against Allah &amp; His Apostle &amp; strive to make mischief (fasadan)* in the 
land&quot;  and the scholar Aga Mahdi Puya &quot;Waging war against Allah and his Prophet means hostility against his chosen representatives, or deviation from his laws
 by overstepping the boundaries laid down by Him... or attempts to undermine the cause of Islam and the overall interests of the Muslims.&quot;   He does not say physical attack.

Just as in 8:39  &quot;Fight them until there is no more fitna (disbelief, persecution) and religion will be for Allah alone (in the whole world).&quot;   Ibn Kathir, comments: &quot;(it is) the order to eradicate Shirk &amp; Kufr. Fight them until there is no more fitna (trial in religion) &amp;  the religion will be for Allah alone (so that there is no more &quot;Kufr&quot;, disbelief)...Rebellion against God&#039;s will is termed as &#039;fitna&quot;. . Fitna refers us to misconduct on the part of a man who establishes his own norms &amp; expects obedience from others, thereby usurping God&#039;s authority, who alone is sovereign.&quot;   This is not talking about physical aggression against Muslims.  It is about beliefs which Islam considers causing disorder, making mischief, spreading corruption. This constitutes war against Islam and merits the cruelest punishments.

The real aggressors are always the unbelievers who reject Allah &amp; his apostle (a rejection led foremost by the Jews, who require ultimate elimination). The rejection itself constitutes fitna, a crime. 8:39: fight until there is no more fitna. 9:29: Fight (qital--kill, slaughter) 
those who believe not in Allah, the Last Day, his Messenger, the Religion of Truth.
Fight against them for their beliefs.  No compulsion in religion? What a joke.

The Muslims who left Arabia to conquer their neighbors  gave them 3 choices only, based on the example of Muhammad. The invitation to Islam, convert.  The choice to live as subjugated people, humbled and subdued.  Or the sword without mercy.  To reject the invitation to Islam was regarded as in itself an act of war against Islam. Therefore, Islam is never the aggressor and always acts in self-defense!  It is opposing, it is rejecting the Call, the invitation to Islam Muslims make before attacking, that is war and  22:39 &quot;to those against whom war is made, 
permission is given to fight.&quot;  This does not mean physical aggression. It means any opposition or criticism, perceived insults, or influence of  non-Muslims in a Muslim society. Muhammad dealt brutally with his 
mockers and critics and declared Jihad on disbelieving mankind.  His followers look to his example.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are the punishments for &#8220;disorder in the land&#8221;&#8230;&#8221;they should be murdered or crucified or their hands &amp; feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned.&#8221;  No I don&#8217;t think &#8220;striving to create disorder&#8221; calls for death and dismemberment.  Now, what does the Qur&#8217;an mean?  &#8220;who slays a soul not to retaliate for a soul slain, nor for corruption in the land&#8230;&#8221; is also translated as &#8220;manslaughter or mischief in the<br />
land.&#8221;  It is also used synonymously with &#8220;waging war against Allah&#8221; as in Ibn Kathir&#8217;s tafsir on 5:33:  &#8220;the punishment of those who wage war against Allah &amp; His Apostle &amp; strive to make mischief (fasadan)* in the<br />
land&#8221;  and the scholar Aga Mahdi Puya &#8220;Waging war against Allah and his Prophet means hostility against his chosen representatives, or deviation from his laws<br />
 by overstepping the boundaries laid down by Him&#8230; or attempts to undermine the cause of Islam and the overall interests of the Muslims.&#8221;   He does not say physical attack.</p>
<p>Just as in 8:39  &#8220;Fight them until there is no more fitna (disbelief, persecution) and religion will be for Allah alone (in the whole world).&#8221;   Ibn Kathir, comments: &#8220;(it is) the order to eradicate Shirk &amp; Kufr. Fight them until there is no more fitna (trial in religion) &amp;  the religion will be for Allah alone (so that there is no more &#8220;Kufr&#8221;, disbelief)&#8230;Rebellion against God&#8217;s will is termed as &#8216;fitna&#8221;. . Fitna refers us to misconduct on the part of a man who establishes his own norms &amp; expects obedience from others, thereby usurping God&#8217;s authority, who alone is sovereign.&#8221;   This is not talking about physical aggression against Muslims.  It is about beliefs which Islam considers causing disorder, making mischief, spreading corruption. This constitutes war against Islam and merits the cruelest punishments.</p>
<p>The real aggressors are always the unbelievers who reject Allah &amp; his apostle (a rejection led foremost by the Jews, who require ultimate elimination). The rejection itself constitutes fitna, a crime. 8:39: fight until there is no more fitna. 9:29: Fight (qital&#8211;kill, slaughter)<br />
those who believe not in Allah, the Last Day, his Messenger, the Religion of Truth.<br />
Fight against them for their beliefs.  No compulsion in religion? What a joke.</p>
<p>The Muslims who left Arabia to conquer their neighbors  gave them 3 choices only, based on the example of Muhammad. The invitation to Islam, convert.  The choice to live as subjugated people, humbled and subdued.  Or the sword without mercy.  To reject the invitation to Islam was regarded as in itself an act of war against Islam. Therefore, Islam is never the aggressor and always acts in self-defense!  It is opposing, it is rejecting the Call, the invitation to Islam Muslims make before attacking, that is war and  22:39 &#8220;to those against whom war is made,<br />
permission is given to fight.&#8221;  This does not mean physical aggression. It means any opposition or criticism, perceived insults, or influence of  non-Muslims in a Muslim society. Muhammad dealt brutally with his<br />
mockers and critics and declared Jihad on disbelieving mankind.  His followers look to his example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KT Shamim</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5255989</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KT Shamim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5255989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[5:33] explicitly states this for those who &quot;strive to create disorder in the land&quot; ... how can you just forget to include that part of the verse in your comment? You really don&#039;t think under a secular government &quot;strive to create disorder in the land&quot; doesn&#039;t deserve punishment? Or expulsion? Really, please tell me how did you miss that crucial part? Or did i miss that part in your post?


Rest of your comments are either medieval scholarly interpretations (which I have shown were certainly not unanimous and which I have explained were only interpretations of the original) or Hadith (which, for the n-teenth time suffer from the weakness of Chinese whispers).


Your complaints and condemnation of current-day orthodox Muslim stances are all valid and well-founded.


After 20 years of mockery and persecution and killing the Meccans put Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) and his companions through he granted them general amnesty. Isn&#039;t that enough anti-blasphemy-law?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[5:33] explicitly states this for those who &#8220;strive to create disorder in the land&#8221; &#8230; how can you just forget to include that part of the verse in your comment? You really don&#8217;t think under a secular government &#8220;strive to create disorder in the land&#8221; doesn&#8217;t deserve punishment? Or expulsion? Really, please tell me how did you miss that crucial part? Or did i miss that part in your post?</p>
<p>Rest of your comments are either medieval scholarly interpretations (which I have shown were certainly not unanimous and which I have explained were only interpretations of the original) or Hadith (which, for the n-teenth time suffer from the weakness of Chinese whispers).</p>
<p>Your complaints and condemnation of current-day orthodox Muslim stances are all valid and well-founded.</p>
<p>After 20 years of mockery and persecution and killing the Meccans put Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) and his companions through he granted them general amnesty. Isn&#8217;t that enough anti-blasphemy-law?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackdiamond</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5255948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jackdiamond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 22:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5255948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I must tell those folks awaiting death for blasphemy, like Asia Bibi, that there is no punishment for blasphemy in Islam.  It will be a big relief.  There certainly is a penalty for Muslims, as in the Shaf&#039;i legal manual Umdat al-Salik &#039;Acts that entail Leaving Islam&#039; --to revile Allah or His Messenger; to be sarcastic about Allah&#039;s name&quot;  There blasphemy is the same as apostasy.  There certainly was a penalty for non-Muslim dhimmis who could lose their &quot;protected&quot; status by offending Muslims or insulting Allah, the Qur&#039;an or Muhammad.  33:57 :those who abuse Allah &amp; His Messenger--Allah has cursed them.&quot;  5:33 describes the penalty for &quot;waging war&quot; against Allah &amp; His Messenger.  Waging war is not primarily physical aggression, it is opposition, criticism, fitnah, mischief, or just rejecting the invitation to Islam.  That&#039;s how Islam looks at criticism and &quot;blasphemy.&quot;  

Did Muhammad shrug off mockery and criticism?  
When he heard of the poetry of the woman Asma bint Marwan which called him a murdering bandit, he called for her murder (&quot;Will no one rid me of this woman?&quot;)  The woman was knifed in her sleep surrounded by her young children. Muhammad&#039;s response? &quot;Killing her was as meaningless as two goats butting heads.&quot;
The poet Ka&#039;b bin Ashraf was murdered for his anti-Islamic poems, he was decapitated to the prophet&#039;s delight. This might be the reason fatwas are everywhere in our times calling for death of those who criticize, belittle, mock Muhammad.  Salman Rushdie, Danish cartoonists, Molly Norris, Theo Van Gogh.  Why the OIC at the UN wants to criminalize free speech that &quot;defames&quot; religion.  Because there is punishment for blasphemy.  Lethal threats of punishment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must tell those folks awaiting death for blasphemy, like Asia Bibi, that there is no punishment for blasphemy in Islam.  It will be a big relief.  There certainly is a penalty for Muslims, as in the Shaf&#8217;i legal manual Umdat al-Salik &#8216;Acts that entail Leaving Islam&#8217; &#8211;to revile Allah or His Messenger; to be sarcastic about Allah&#8217;s name&#8221;  There blasphemy is the same as apostasy.  There certainly was a penalty for non-Muslim dhimmis who could lose their &#8220;protected&#8221; status by offending Muslims or insulting Allah, the Qur&#8217;an or Muhammad.  33:57 :those who abuse Allah &amp; His Messenger&#8211;Allah has cursed them.&#8221;  5:33 describes the penalty for &#8220;waging war&#8221; against Allah &amp; His Messenger.  Waging war is not primarily physical aggression, it is opposition, criticism, fitnah, mischief, or just rejecting the invitation to Islam.  That&#8217;s how Islam looks at criticism and &#8220;blasphemy.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Did Muhammad shrug off mockery and criticism?<br />
When he heard of the poetry of the woman Asma bint Marwan which called him a murdering bandit, he called for her murder (&#8220;Will no one rid me of this woman?&#8221;)  The woman was knifed in her sleep surrounded by her young children. Muhammad&#8217;s response? &#8220;Killing her was as meaningless as two goats butting heads.&#8221;<br />
The poet Ka&#8217;b bin Ashraf was murdered for his anti-Islamic poems, he was decapitated to the prophet&#8217;s delight. This might be the reason fatwas are everywhere in our times calling for death of those who criticize, belittle, mock Muhammad.  Salman Rushdie, Danish cartoonists, Molly Norris, Theo Van Gogh.  Why the OIC at the UN wants to criminalize free speech that &#8220;defames&#8221; religion.  Because there is punishment for blasphemy.  Lethal threats of punishment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KT Shamim</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5255893</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KT Shamim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5255893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People like you give people like jackdiamond ammunition to insult Islam. There is no punishment for blasphemy. In fact Qur&#039;an says:

[Qur&#039;an 3:187] &quot;... you shall surely hear many hurtful things from those who were given the Book before you and from those who set up equals to God. But if you show fortitude and act righteously, that indeed is a matter of strong determination.&quot;



Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) was insulted verbally during all his Prophethood. How can you think he retaliated physically to verbal abuse on his own self?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People like you give people like jackdiamond ammunition to insult Islam. There is no punishment for blasphemy. In fact Qur&#8217;an says:</p>
<p>[Qur'an 3:187] &#8220;&#8230; you shall surely hear many hurtful things from those who were given the Book before you and from those who set up equals to God. But if you show fortitude and act righteously, that indeed is a matter of strong determination.&#8221;</p>
<p>Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) was insulted verbally during all his Prophethood. How can you think he retaliated physically to verbal abuse on his own self?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KT Shamim</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5255888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KT Shamim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 21:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5255888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FYI, yeah. I think I acknowledged it before but it is fact that the last two paths of Surah Fatihah refer to Jews (on whom wrath was bestowed) and Christians (those who went astray). Though as stated God&#039;s curse on a people who went astray does not translate to command to kill them ... that inference is a huge longshot. Christians believe disbelievers in Christ are cursed but don&#039;t go killing them as a result (Crusades had nothing to do with Christianity).

And yeah nothing to hide about. Surah Kahf and Surah Maryum which are about Jews and Christians were both revealed in Mecca. So would you but stop with the &quot;code&quot;?

As for punishment of blasphemy:

[Qur&#039;an 3:187] &quot;... you shall surely hear many hurtful things from those who were given the Book before you and from those who set up equals to God. But if you show fortitude and act righteously, that indeed is a matter of strong determination.&quot;



i.e. no punishment. (Chapter 3 is a Medinite chapter in case you were gonna point out the abrogation argument).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, yeah. I think I acknowledged it before but it is fact that the last two paths of Surah Fatihah refer to Jews (on whom wrath was bestowed) and Christians (those who went astray). Though as stated God&#8217;s curse on a people who went astray does not translate to command to kill them &#8230; that inference is a huge longshot. Christians believe disbelievers in Christ are cursed but don&#8217;t go killing them as a result (Crusades had nothing to do with Christianity).</p>
<p>And yeah nothing to hide about. Surah Kahf and Surah Maryum which are about Jews and Christians were both revealed in Mecca. So would you but stop with the &#8220;code&#8221;?</p>
<p>As for punishment of blasphemy:</p>
<p>[Qur'an 3:187] &#8220;&#8230; you shall surely hear many hurtful things from those who were given the Book before you and from those who set up equals to God. But if you show fortitude and act righteously, that indeed is a matter of strong determination.&#8221;</p>
<p>i.e. no punishment. (Chapter 3 is a Medinite chapter in case you were gonna point out the abrogation argument).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackdiamond</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-bawer/hating-jews-a-global-study/comment-page-1/#comment-5255313</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jackdiamond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=198810#comment-5255313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You don&#039;t find the Qur&#039;anic verses above insulting and hateful to Jews? Have you ever even seen anything like it, the venom and hate, for the very character of all Jews?


 You think it is okay to kill someone for writing poetry.  You think it is okay to kill someone for insulting Muhammad.  That&#039;s all we need to know about you.  Jews are named by most every Islamic scholar as being those who earned the wrath and Christians as having gone astray.  That&#039;s not my opinion. Tafsir Ibn Kathir (one of many many scholars who say the same thing) &quot;These two paths are the paths of the Christians and the Jews, a fact that the believer should be aware of so that he avoids them...the Jews abandoned practicing the true religion, while the Christians lost the true knowledge. This is why &#039;anger&#039; descended upon the Jews, while being described as &#039;led astray&#039; is more appropriate of the Christians.  Allah said about the Jews (those Jews) who incurred the curse of Allah and His wrath (5:60) just as Allah said about Christians who went stray and who misled many and strayed from the right path (5:77)&quot;


 The verse was written in &quot;code&quot; to conceal it&#039;s intention during the Hijra to Medina.  Since the Qur&#039;an absolutely confirms this judgment on both in numerous places, I don&#039;t see why it&#039;s a problem for you to acknowledge the obvious.  


The ultimate source of this enmity is Muhammad and Muhammad only.  Muhammad made the claim to the source of Monotheism and claimed the roots of Judeo Christian monotheism for himself and Islam.  His enmity comes from that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t find the Qur&#8217;anic verses above insulting and hateful to Jews? Have you ever even seen anything like it, the venom and hate, for the very character of all Jews?</p>
<p> You think it is okay to kill someone for writing poetry.  You think it is okay to kill someone for insulting Muhammad.  That&#8217;s all we need to know about you.  Jews are named by most every Islamic scholar as being those who earned the wrath and Christians as having gone astray.  That&#8217;s not my opinion. Tafsir Ibn Kathir (one of many many scholars who say the same thing) &#8220;These two paths are the paths of the Christians and the Jews, a fact that the believer should be aware of so that he avoids them&#8230;the Jews abandoned practicing the true religion, while the Christians lost the true knowledge. This is why &#8216;anger&#8217; descended upon the Jews, while being described as &#8216;led astray&#8217; is more appropriate of the Christians.  Allah said about the Jews (those Jews) who incurred the curse of Allah and His wrath (5:60) just as Allah said about Christians who went stray and who misled many and strayed from the right path (5:77)&#8221;</p>
<p> The verse was written in &#8220;code&#8221; to conceal it&#8217;s intention during the Hijra to Medina.  Since the Qur&#8217;an absolutely confirms this judgment on both in numerous places, I don&#8217;t see why it&#8217;s a problem for you to acknowledge the obvious.  </p>
<p>The ultimate source of this enmity is Muhammad and Muhammad only.  Muhammad made the claim to the source of Monotheism and claimed the roots of Judeo Christian monotheism for himself and Islam.  His enmity comes from that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 755/787 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 11:33:22 by W3 Total Cache -->