In Love With Easeful Death

“I have been half in love with easeful Death…”
– John Keats, “Ode to a Nightingale”

Easeful death: that, in a nutshell, is the topic of Samuel Gregg’s new book, Becoming Europe: Economic Decline, Culture, and How America Can Avoid a European Future. Gregg, who is the director of research at the Acton Institute, reminds us that when Alexis de Tocqueville traveled to America in 1831, he encountered a nation of people who startled and impressed him with their robustness, energy, ambition, and entrepreneurial spirit – in a word, their life. The America of today, or at least the America of not very long ago, was still recognizably, at heart, the same America that Tocqueville wrote about in Democracy in America: a country of hard-working, optimistic people who believed ardently in self-reliance, individual enterprise, and – above all – freedom.

Gregg contrasts this intensely vital America with the nations of Europe that, since World War II, have rejected U.S.-style liberal democracy in favor of social democracy, subordinating individual liberty to cradle-to-grave communal security and allowing their economic vigor to be smothered by, as Gregg puts it, the “dead hand of the state.” If indeed what Europeans enjoy today is a kind of “easeful death,” it is a death that many of them would die rather than give up. Frenchmen who can’t bring themselves to get up in the morning and go to work – preferring instead to live on generous government benefits – are nonetheless able to spend days on end marching in the streets, stopping traffic, ranting at gendermes, and mounting the barricades, Les Miz-style, in protest against even the slightest proposed rollback in those handouts.

Never mind the economic logic of the situation – the fact that something’s eventually got to give. We’re talking about multiple generations of Europeans who have been brought up on the idea that they’re entitled. The idea that a society, to be truly humane, must temper the harshness of capitalism through the multifarious efforts of a benign state. The idea that today’s European social-democratic welfare state represents the very culmination of the millennia-long progress of human civilization. And, of course, the idea that even the slightest compromise with realism would amount to an inexcusable step back toward American-style barbarism. As Jacques Chirac put it (disgracefully) in 2005, liberalism – meaning an economy more like America’s – “would be as disastrous as communism” to his country. Or how about this dumb line, which Gregg credits to former European Commission president Jacques Delors: “Cinema explains American society. It’s like a Western, with good guys and bad guys, where the weak don’t have a place.” (Yes, and in France all the conversations are in song, just like in The Umbrellas of Cherbourg.) The America-as-Wild-West meme is a moribund cliché, of course, but it’s alive and well in the Land of the Dead.

The other day Michael Moore’s 2007 health-care “documentary,” Sicko, happened to be on TV where I live, and I caught a scene in which Moore sat around a table with a half-dozen or so American expatriates who live in Paris – and who, to his obvious delight, couldn’t stop singing the praises of the Gallic system, which they all exultantly described, in essence, as a bottomless Christmas stocking stuffed with goodies. It wasn’t just free medical care – it was free everything. How shameful, they all concurred, that America can’t be the same way! Who other than mean, hateful people would be against that? Even the Brits (can these be the same folks who made Margaret Thatcher the longest-serving PM of the century?) have drunk the Kool-Aid. A new poll says that 72% of them think their National Health System embodies “what is great about Britain” and that “we must do everything we can to maintain it.” That’s what’s great about Britain? Really? A government bureaucracy? Drop for a moment the question of whether socialized medicine is a blessing or a curse – think what it says about Britain that three-quarters of its citizens now apparently conceive of national greatness in this fashion. What percentage of them, I wonder, would identify their nation’s greatness with, say, Magna Carta, Shakespeare, the Book of Common Prayer, Isaac Newton’s scientific legacy, Christopher Wren’s architecture, J.M.W. Turner’s paintings, Edward Elgar’s music, Churchill’s speeches, Olivier’s films? What about Stephen Hawking? Or, for that matter, Keats?

It’s thanks to such blinkered thinking that some of Europe’s welfare states are already as good as dead and others living on borrowed time. And yet it’s not just Michael Moore’s clueless expatriate pals in Paris who’d like to see the U.S. (which, needless to say, has meandered too far down that road already) embrace an even more highly regulated economic system, one that obsessively redistributes wealth, thoroughly punishes entrepreneurship, and consistently subordinates economic freedom to economic security – or, rather, the illusion thereof. As Gregg reminds us, many politicians, pundits, and even economists in the U.S. held up the 2008 financial crisis as proof that “the twenty-first century’s economic future did not lie in America” but in the European Union. Well, yes, America is in a hell of an fiscal pickle – but it ain’t because it doesn’t have a sufficiently lavish and bountiful welfare system.

And that’s more or less the point of Gregg’s book – which he’s written because he recognizes an even greater Europeanization of the U.S. economy as a real, and perilous, possibility. To be sure, as he underscores, America is “not yet Europe.” At least some Americans actually fret about deficit spending and public debt; even now, with the writing on the wall (in big letters, and in all twenty-three official EU languages), few Europeans do. U.S. labor markets are still more flexible than Europe’s. And Americans are still entrepreneurial-minded. Europe, the World Bank points out, “has few companies that match the dynamism of Apple, Amazon, Google, Facebook, or Microsoft.” Still, in recent years America’s ranking on the Global Innovation Index has slipped; its GDP has declined relative to other G-20 economies; and – in what Gregg calls “the real shock” – the percentage of Americans who take a positive view of free markets has, according to a survey he cites, dropped dramatically. (Gregg says nothing about Obama’s re-election, presumably because Becoming Europe had already gone to press by November 6.)

Perhaps the sanest, wisest, and most responsible leader in Europe today is Czech president Václav Klaus, who unlike most of his counterparts on the continent has no illusions about the facts before him. “Europeans are not interested in capitalism and free markets,” he complained in a 2011 speech quoted by Gregg, “and do not understand that their current behavior undermines the very institutions that made their past success possible.” Alas, the number of Americans about whom the same might be said is higher than ever and still rising, with no end in sight to the self-destructive self-delusion.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

  • objectivefactsmatter

    “and do not understand that their current behavior undermines the very institutions that made their past success possible.”

    It's so obvious. As someone said recently, as even peasants once understood, or something to that effect. I get the idea that the lazy leftists are waiting around for some other "miracle" like silicon chip-based semi-conductors, or a new "game changer" like the Internet. These all came from the cold war. At best they can hope for "free energy" somehow but then what comes after that? Marx was wrong. We will always need to work. Master plans will always fail because forecasts always fail at least to some extent.

    Sick of leftists.

  • http://www.adinakutnicki.com AdinaK

    Entitlement means that productivity eventually ceases. This in turn leads to easeful death – the death of western civilization. The radical left, in concert with Islamists, are seeking just that, hence, the red/green alliance – http://adinakutnicki.com/2013/01/22/the-moral-dec

    The moral decline of Europe and America are mirror images. What happens to one will happen to the other. Simple as that.

    Adina kutnicki, Israel – http://adinakutnicki.com/about/

  • Mary Sue

    Leftism by nature ends up Nihilistic. They stop reproducing, they start wanting crap like euthanasia/assisted suicide, and don't bat an eyelash except in approval of millions of abortions. It's a death cult of sorts, really. So it's no surprise that heavily Leftist nations are on the decline.

  • Chezwick

    Hate to be the pessimist here, but America's debt-to-GDP ratio is worse than most European countries….and this last election essentially closed the last window-of-opportunity on our ability to ever rectify our stratospheric debt trajectory. To quote Del Amitri, "kiss this thing good-bye."

  • Ghostwriter

    I hope you're wrong,Chezwick. Things could get pretty back if we don't straighten up soon.

    • Chezwick

      I hope I'm wrong too, Ghost. But this is about cold, hard numbers….and the debt trajectory shows no sign of leveling, the government shows no sign of any willingness to reign-in spending, and the electorate shows no sign of exercising its voting prerogatives responsibly. I'm sorry, but I refuse to play the game of false optimism, a game played by my Dad and so many other fellow-conservatives, who are hanging on the prayer that at the 11th hour, all of a sudden, the American people will sober up and elect a responsible government and our culture of spending will be ameliorated overnight.

      The voters re-elected the party of debt (Dems)….and even the Republicans refuse to get specific about entitlements (Medicare and Medicaid) that need to be dismantled in order to stave off insolvency. There is absolutely no collective will to make the necessary sacrifices.

  • Jozy

    Europeans seriously need to get their asses back to work. Where are todays entrepreneurs? Where are the new large prosperous multinationals? There are a handfull (Shell, Philips, ASML, Siemens) but they were all started tens if not hundreds of years ago.
    No, European governments would rather tax the hard working to keep the museums open, the ivory tower universities full of woolly academics, state funded television and the EU/euro, and, last but not least, muslim immigrants on benefits. Income taxes in excess of 50%. It's disastrous. This can't last for much longer.

  • xavier823

    America started jogging down the road to socialism serfdom back in 1965 with Johnson , a Democrat. Since then both political parties have pushed us along in that direction. The only thing that might stop U.S. socialism is the ultimate collapse of our economy .

  • Fritz

    I've experienced this European mindset firsthand when someone from Spain, on an online forum, didn't like my assessment of what Socialism is for. I said that the object of Socialism is to get and to keep politicians elected and keep themselves in power, by offering free stuff to get votes. He thought that this was a very cynical and incorrect interpretation of what Socialism is about. Really? Well the evidence suggests otherwise.
    Even though Americans tend to think of France as Socialist, which it is, it's actually pretty middle of the road compared to some in Europe. In Spain and Portugal they had health care that was 100% state funded, in France they make people pay up front and then re-reimburse 75% of the cost. In Greece they had a no money down pension plan that allowed people to retire at age 53, in Germany the retirement age is 67 and they have to pay into it. In France and Germany they do actually produce products the rest of the world wants, Greece produces nothing but wine, ouzo, and olive oil, Portugal isn't much different, Spain is somewhat better but not by much.
    So basically what you will find in most of Europe is that the so called "Democrat Socialists" are the decedents of the ruling aristocracy from centuries gone by, if not in actual bloodline at least in legacy. Almost all are from the upper middle class or higher, none are sons of farmers, shop keepers, or coal miners, some like the former Greek Prime Minister are professional politicians from a family of professional politicians.
    This is a way to quash any upward mobility from society, stay in power, and prevent any upstarts from upsetting the pecking order, but without upward mobility there is no growth and you end up with a downward spiral of decreasing tax revenues, decreasing economic growth, increasing costs, and increasing debt.. As Maggie Thatcher once said the problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money to spend.
    Greece could have cleaned up the majority of the mess three years ago and been on the path to recovery by now by following the path of New Zealand and many former Communist states. But they have an elite who does not want to give up their position in society being advised by other European "Social Democrats" who have no clue how an economy is supposed to function themselves.