So Long, Queen Beatrix

ce1b71316511ea03270f6a70670071f1-4_3_r536_c534Today is Queen’s Day in the Netherlands. It’s also the last day on the job for the reigning monarch, Beatrix, who’s stepping down after having been on the throne since her own mother, Juliana, abdicated in 1980.

I’ve been in every kingdom in Europe, but in none of them, I think it’s fair to say, are the people as enthusiastic about their sovereign as in the Netherlands. Take Queen’s Day itself: it’s the Dutch equivalent to the Fourth of July, but the focus is not on the people and their history but on the head of state, whose birthday it celebrates. Go on a pub crawl in any Dutch town and you’ll encounter – guaranteed – one framed (and, quite frequently, enormous) portrait after another of Beatrix, usually over the bar, sometimes with a big vase of fresh tulips in front of it. One grows accustomed to hearing Brits complaining about the Windsors’ luxurious lifestyles, and in Norway the levels of cynicism about and indifference to the royals is surprisingly high. But don’t ever say a critical word about Beatrix to a Dutchman, unless you want to end up with a bicycle frame wrapped around your neck.

This high level of affection for Beatrix is rather surprising, given the fact that her ride hasn’t always been a smooth one. Start with her 1966 marriage to Claus von Amsberg, who before marrying her was a German diplomat, and, before that, a member of the Hitler Youth and Wehrmacht. In a country where the anti-German sentiment engendered by World War II is still palpable to this day – probably higher than anywhere else in Western Europe – the match didn’t go over well, and the wedding day was marked by massive protests.

Then there’s her wealth. Everyone knows that Queen Elizabeth II is rolling in dough, but so is Beatrix. When Forbes claimed in 1999 that Beatrix (who is exempt from taxes) was worth tens of billions of dollars, scandal erupted in the egalitarian Netherlands – not only over the amount but over the secretiveness surrounding the royal estate. (“She’s very, very clever at making sure no one can trace her money,” one expert told the Guardian.) More recent estimates of Beatrix’s wealth have been far lower, but even after reportedly being taken to the cleaners by Bernie Madoff (a claim the palace denied), her family fortune is still said to amount to something in the vicinity of a billion dollars. Last year, with Europe hurting economically, Spain’s King Juan Carlos, who isn’t especially rich and lives modestly, voluntarily returned some of his paycheck to the government; when asked if Beatrix would contemplate doing the same with her annual salary, which is in the million-dollar range (she also receives several million a year to cover expenses, and the 300 employees at her various residences, not counting security personnel, cost Dutch taxpayers about $50 million), her spokespeople replied with a quick, succinct nee. Yet the Dutch people still love her.

Fine. But for anyone who sincerely cares about the Netherlands, the defining day of Beatrix’s reign was November 12, 2004. On November 2, the Dutch movie director, author, and TV personality Theo van Gogh had been slaughtered in open daylight in an Amsterdam street by a Dutch-Moroccan jihadist. The murder was payback for van Gogh’s forthright criticism of the illiberality of Islam. But it was also a warning to Beatrix and her subjects. A knife thrust into van Gogh’s corpse held in place a note by the killer, Mohamed Bouyeri, declaring that, just like van Gogh, America, Europe, and the Netherlands would “go down.” It was a time at which any responsible head of state would have felt compelled to make a powerful symbolic statement about her country’s dedication to its freedoms and its determination not to yield to jihad.

Beatrix failed the test – ignominiously. She turned down the van Gogh family’s invitation to his funeral, saying she had other plans. Many Dutch people longed for her to speak to the nation about the atrocity, but she rejected that idea, too. What she did instead, apparently on the advice of Amsterdam mayor Job Cohen (a loathsome dhimmi of the first order), was to pay a visit to a Moroccan youth center in Amsterdam. There she spoke with a number of young Dutch-Moroccans, made remarks about the equality of all Dutch citizens, and was presented with a gift book about the history of Morocco. (One wonders how familiar these kids were with Dutch history.)

The center was in the city’s Oud-West neighborhood, and if Beatrix insisted on going there, it might at least have been useful had she found some way to bring up the tyrannical domination of Muslim families in that part of town by local religious authorities, who are their rulers in a much realer sense than she’s ever been. She might have expressed some concern about the countless Muslim wives and mothers in the neighborhood who don’t speak Dutch, rarely if ever get out of the house, and don’t even know where their children’s schools are located. She might have tried to acquire insights into the neighborhood’s sky-high levels of crime, unemployment, and welfare dependency. But no: Beatrix didn’t want to address reality. Look, after all, where a determination to face up to reality got van Gogh.

In an open letter addressed to Bouyeri, a group of van Gogh’s friends sarcastically posed as so many perfect dhimmis: “How terrible that everything went as it did. We had no idea that this was such a sensitive issue. We have learned our lesson….Could you soon give us guidelines showing us what are allowed and not allowed to say?…We will make it a point to study your religion to prevent further misunderstandings….That we brought you into such a difficult position is surely our own fault.” Alas, Beatrix, in her interactions with the Dutch-Moroccan youths that day, seemed to be following a script that was very much alone those disgraceful dhimmi lines.

As for Beatrix’s successor – well, let’s just say there’s no reason to dance in the streets. Beatrix’s son Willem-Alexander, who becomes king today, is a colorless dimwit who, in 2007, in an obvious reference to Geert Wilders, criticized politicians who use strong language when speaking of Islam and integration. “Not for nothing,” said the prince, “do we have the saying: ‘Speech is silver, silence is golden.” In other words, a guy who was born into a extremely well-paying job – the only requirement of which is that he keep his nose out of public affairs – was putting down a guy whose job, into which he had been placed by the Dutch electorate, obliges him to speak up. Don’t expect, then, that the new king of the Netherlands will do anything but hinder his most courageous subject’s efforts to rescue their country from disaster.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

  • Mary Sue

    Ugh, this is what happens when the blue blood that runs in their veins becomes stagnant.

  • Niels_Verwoert

    Her speeches about how good the EU and tolerance of immigrants is and a complete ignorance of the muslim parasite hordes in all our major cities made her a traitor of the Dutch people and no rightful queen of mine.

  • Paul

    Although the criticism levied against our royals with regard to Muslim parasite hordes (as Mr. Verwoert rightly calls them) is fully justified, titulating our new king Willem Alexander as a "colorless dimwit" is below the belt and bad style.

    • Larry

      Hitting below the belt is bad style because it's accurate and effective.

      If describing a colorless dimwit as a colorless dimwit is below the belt…………..

      • Paul

        For somebody who only knows Willem Alexander from TV and yellow press, you seem to be quite opinionated about him.

        • Michael vd Galien

          Uhm. It has been well known for decades – literally – that WA is not the most intelligent guy you'll ever meet. He had trouble at school, etc. It was even so bad that Beatrix feared he wasn't up to the task (of being king). Ever since he met Maxima those worries seem to have disappeared, probably due to the fact that she is very intelligent and insightful.

  • EchoVector

    It is not in the interest of the global banking elite to pursue any kind of peace or harmony. The satanic banker cabals have been making their earthly fortunes from the misery and death of God's people since the beginning of recorded history.

    Sadly, however, even when shown the facts and truth that these satanic bankers fund every side of a conflict in order to maximize profit and death, the blinded people still worship them as leaders.

    This particular face of evil will soon be replaced with another, rest assured.

    And the blind will bow down and worship their new master.

  • Richard N

    Bruce is probably correct, Queen Beatrix has had a long tradition of being on the Left on social policy. She was known as the 'pink' princess, a play on the name of the House of Orange, long before she became Queen. Her husband Prins Claus was a good friend of Nyerere, the socialist idealist who devastated Tanzania. Her daughter-in-law Mabel is connected with that ridiculous group The Elders, Tutu, Carter , Robinson et al and was until recently employed by George Soros. Beatrix's embrace of muslims in the aftermath of van Gogh's murder fits in with her world view. It also fits in with the Dutch idea of 'tolerance', which is, in effect, more the idea of turning a blind eye, not wanting trouble, hoping that it will go away…
    She's been a dedicated Monarch, people respect that, she carries such familial history. Teddy Roosevelt couldn't stand her grandmother, Queen Wilhelmina, maybe it's a Yank thing!

  • Bruce Bawer

    I might also mention Willem-Alexander's wife, the new Dutch queen, whose dad was a leading member of the Argentinian military junta of Jorge Rafael Videla, under which thousands of regime opponents were tortured, murdered, or “disappeared.”

    • Richard N

      I don't think Queen Beatrix was particularly democratic. Loved her country, loved the people but wanted to gently move them in the 'right' direction: multi-culti, EU friendly. A kind of upper class 'we know what's best for you.' Paternalism in a female form.

      • Cassandra

        Paternalism in a female form. That is well put. My mother is from Belgium and the same thing happens with the royals there. Just pure paternalism. Disgusting. The funny thing about the king is that he has to go through Brusseslkistan neighborhood everyday from Laekenistan to his palace in Brussels to WORK.

      • Micha Elyi

        "I don't think Queen Beatrix was particularly democratic."-Richard N

        You were doin' ok for the first 3 words. Hint: A queen is not "democratic" by definition.

    • Paul

      Are you implying that Máxima is co-responsible for what this Videla character did ? Clan liability is no longer part of our legal system. I'd have thought you know this.

  • sjand3kids

    Once the Netherlands becomes an Islamic republic there will be no king or queen and their vast family fortune will become jizya. You remember …. Off with their heads!

  • Eduardo

    If it is not a socialist Fabian is very close.
    The royal houses of Europe, especially England and Holland are delivered to confabulations against Western civilization itself supporting Islam. Beatrix is cachetic of Western values ​​and freedoms, must attend classes in Western history, with Geert Wilders before dying.

  • http://twitter.com/theoprinse @theoprinse

    Thanks for the article mr. Bawer. You are well informed on the subject although there is many many more relevant factors still to be told like the original Willem van Nassau Dillenburg van Orange were secretly monarchists and acted against the republican will of the people in Holland. Nobel families in Holland like republicans Johan en Cornelis de Witt family, Bicker, de Graeff, Muys van Holy, Slingelandt, van Beveren etc abolished political heredity by means of the unique Republic of the Netherlands. Here is my lineage: https://www.facebook.com/theo.prinse/info
    Also the father of Zorreguieta being complicit to the Videla murderous regime in Argentine.
    Here is my comment today in many influencial news media in the Netherlands.
    The degrading and ridiculous scene in Amsterdam to try to enforce upon free people a feeling to appeal to an uncontrollable authority is – as germans say – zum kotzen.
    German republicans would say they are hurt in their pride but Dutch republicans are sober.
    Apart from 16 unswerving members – the rest of the Dutch political elite figurated as assessors in an abject feudal display of demagogy and to quasi legitimize this constitutional travesty towards the less educated people in the Dutch society.
    Every monarchy of any sort merely allows to legitimate the free political will of the (Dutch) society for good governance to let the monarchists organize into a political monarchist degenerated faction to allow obscure, submissive, acquiescent behavior and to allow that the government administration of the country in an occult manner be influenced.
    The monarchy of any type whatsoever is thus in many ways at odds with any democratic, efficient and transparent administration.
    In the spirit of the Boys of Johan and Cornelis de Witt:
    Long live the Republic !

  • http://goo.gl/LIwbr $5 page one ranking

    I ranked a month old website for a profitable keyword using this simple $5 fiverr gig. – http://goo.gl/LIwbr – Click here to check it out

  • WilliamJamesWard

    To the Queen, have a nice day, to the new King, have a nice day……….just being nice.
    William………………zzzzZZZZZ__