<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fifteen Minutes of Foreign Policy Malfeasance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 21:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Long Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5275130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Long Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2013 06:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5275130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately the truth about the majority of Muslims is lost on this ponce Obama. The truth about the majority of Muslims that in order to enjoy any amount of ordered liberty a Strongman is needed. The experiment with democracy in Egypt
 is a perfect illustration. No sooner did they have elections, were they knowingly asking for sharia. How messed up is that? It&#039;s a good job the U.S. is a Representative Republic (  let&#039;s not forget ) lest we wind up with a mobaucracy as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately the truth about the majority of Muslims is lost on this ponce Obama. The truth about the majority of Muslims that in order to enjoy any amount of ordered liberty a Strongman is needed. The experiment with democracy in Egypt<br />
 is a perfect illustration. No sooner did they have elections, were they knowingly asking for sharia. How messed up is that? It&#8217;s a good job the U.S. is a Representative Republic (  let&#8217;s not forget ) lest we wind up with a mobaucracy as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DVult</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5274157</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DVult]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5274157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sort of like a Cornel West with better hair although I suppose he could grow it out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sort of like a Cornel West with better hair although I suppose he could grow it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5273693</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5273693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The one good thing about this, is that Israel will finally begin to realize that it is truly alone and must take 100% control of its own destiny. All illusions about being able to rely on the states for moral support, much less protection, should be thoroughly shattered. My Israel will finally begin to understand that it has to take care of the Iranian threat by itself. This could actually be an important lesson for the Israelis. It always was truly alone, now the Israelis will take matters into its own hands.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one good thing about this, is that Israel will finally begin to realize that it is truly alone and must take 100% control of its own destiny. All illusions about being able to rely on the states for moral support, much less protection, should be thoroughly shattered. My Israel will finally begin to understand that it has to take care of the Iranian threat by itself. This could actually be an important lesson for the Israelis. It always was truly alone, now the Israelis will take matters into its own hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KBLinMI</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5273620</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KBLinMI]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5273620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can we be surprised by any of this? Obama&#039;s foreign policy strategy is accomplishing exactly what he has always wanted; a weaker America. This is what America looks like when its &quot;exceptionalism&quot; is no different than the exceptionalism of France, Germany, Turkey, or even Guatemala. Bravo, Barack! Neville Chamberlain would be very proud!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can we be surprised by any of this? Obama&#8217;s foreign policy strategy is accomplishing exactly what he has always wanted; a weaker America. This is what America looks like when its &#8220;exceptionalism&#8221; is no different than the exceptionalism of France, Germany, Turkey, or even Guatemala. Bravo, Barack! Neville Chamberlain would be very proud!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellman48</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5273562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellman48]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 06:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5273562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;His foreign policy philosophy was encapsulated in his 2007 Foreign Affairs
 article, in which he promised to use America’s power “not in the spirit
 of a patron but in the spirit of a partner––a partner mindful of his 
own imperfections.”


Obama missed his true calling: to be a college professor, lecturing his students about the immorality of conservatives, the wickedness of Wall Street business forces, the arrogance of the US, the meaning of &#039;fairness&#039; and how fairness should trump individual effort as a measure of a &#039;just society&#039;. Ya da, Ya da!


He refers to the US as a &quot;partner - a partner mindful of his own imperfections. He may be mindful of the imperfections of the United States, but how aware is he about the imperfections he possesses? Everything considered, one has to conclude that Obama views himself as more than mortal. He will always see himself in this delusional manner, which is why he will blame George Bush for every problem he &quot;inherited&quot; and every problem he created under his own power. He knows how to dissemble and to misrepresent and the Republicans in the Congress. The Republicans, especially since John Boehner became Speaker of the House, have capitulated on every issue. Boehner, like Obama, is more concerned about keeping his job for as long as possible. That concern has nothing to do with doing the right thing for the nation. It is completely motivated by personal desires, needs and ambition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;His foreign policy philosophy was encapsulated in his 2007 Foreign Affairs<br />
 article, in which he promised to use America’s power “not in the spirit<br />
 of a patron but in the spirit of a partner––a partner mindful of his<br />
own imperfections.”</p>
<p>Obama missed his true calling: to be a college professor, lecturing his students about the immorality of conservatives, the wickedness of Wall Street business forces, the arrogance of the US, the meaning of &#8216;fairness&#8217; and how fairness should trump individual effort as a measure of a &#8216;just society&#8217;. Ya da, Ya da!</p>
<p>He refers to the US as a &#8220;partner &#8211; a partner mindful of his own imperfections. He may be mindful of the imperfections of the United States, but how aware is he about the imperfections he possesses? Everything considered, one has to conclude that Obama views himself as more than mortal. He will always see himself in this delusional manner, which is why he will blame George Bush for every problem he &#8220;inherited&#8221; and every problem he created under his own power. He knows how to dissemble and to misrepresent and the Republicans in the Congress. The Republicans, especially since John Boehner became Speaker of the House, have capitulated on every issue. Boehner, like Obama, is more concerned about keeping his job for as long as possible. That concern has nothing to do with doing the right thing for the nation. It is completely motivated by personal desires, needs and ambition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John4</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5273512</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 04:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5273512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fumbling and bumbling of the president doesn&#039;t change an iota to the stature of the United States in the world. The whole world knows that America is a very powerful country.  To attack Syria in order to support the murderous jihadists and to &quot;save the face &quot; of the president  would have been a grave error.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fumbling and bumbling of the president doesn&#8217;t change an iota to the stature of the United States in the world. The whole world knows that America is a very powerful country.  To attack Syria in order to support the murderous jihadists and to &#8220;save the face &#8221; of the president  would have been a grave error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drakken</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5273468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drakken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 00:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5273468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Better to have the right General or president deal with the islamaniacs than us, because the leftist human rights crowd would have a complete meltdown if we started to shoot their favorite pet social engineering experiment.  The only way you go to war with muslims is by total war, anything  else is doomed to failure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better to have the right General or president deal with the islamaniacs than us, because the leftist human rights crowd would have a complete meltdown if we started to shoot their favorite pet social engineering experiment.  The only way you go to war with muslims is by total war, anything  else is doomed to failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aizino Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5273424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aizino Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5273424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Don&#039;t worry the left won&#039;t protest the war until the first fatality&quot;

I kind of believe that.  But it will be harder for them to protest Obama  than say Clinton.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t worry the left won&#8217;t protest the war until the first fatality&#8221;</p>
<p>I kind of believe that.  But it will be harder for them to protest Obama  than say Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aizino Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5273421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aizino Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5273421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Syria is literally the conduit whereby arms and other support is flown from Iran to Hezbollah. Without it Hezbollah is at a greater disadvantage vis-a-vis Israel.  Arms can be shipped via the Suez canal but that is subjected to interdiction by the Egyptians and Israelis. If Syria fell and the new government was hostile or iffy, Iranian flights to resupply Hezbollah might be interdicted.

Without Iranian support 
Hezebollah has a harder time versus the Sunnis of tripoli, etc.

If Iran loses Syria and subsequently Hezbollah, they lose 2 allies.  that makes them more isolated and weaker.  Iraq is an Iranian ally, but there are enough Sunnis and Kurds that, a Shia PM and parliament might put there finger in the air and not support Iran if it would be Iran&#039;s only ally in the middle east.

Afghanistan is contested between Pakistan and Iran with Pakistan having the edge.

Turkey is not fond of Iran, they would be more likely to back Azerbaijan than Iran and the Azeris hate Iran.  they want a piece of it. 

Russia will support Iran but they sometimes they cannot do a lot.  they helped Vietnam in 1979 versus China. they wanted to help Sadam in 2003. They wanted to help Libya.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Syria is literally the conduit whereby arms and other support is flown from Iran to Hezbollah. Without it Hezbollah is at a greater disadvantage vis-a-vis Israel.  Arms can be shipped via the Suez canal but that is subjected to interdiction by the Egyptians and Israelis. If Syria fell and the new government was hostile or iffy, Iranian flights to resupply Hezbollah might be interdicted.</p>
<p>Without Iranian support<br />
Hezebollah has a harder time versus the Sunnis of tripoli, etc.</p>
<p>If Iran loses Syria and subsequently Hezbollah, they lose 2 allies.  that makes them more isolated and weaker.  Iraq is an Iranian ally, but there are enough Sunnis and Kurds that, a Shia PM and parliament might put there finger in the air and not support Iran if it would be Iran&#8217;s only ally in the middle east.</p>
<p>Afghanistan is contested between Pakistan and Iran with Pakistan having the edge.</p>
<p>Turkey is not fond of Iran, they would be more likely to back Azerbaijan than Iran and the Azeris hate Iran.  they want a piece of it. </p>
<p>Russia will support Iran but they sometimes they cannot do a lot.  they helped Vietnam in 1979 versus China. they wanted to help Sadam in 2003. They wanted to help Libya.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5273417</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5273417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;So, according to you, we should have allowed Saddam to take Kuwait . And then Saudi Arabia ... and then what?&quot;

Not at all.  There are many American interests (and values) worth pursuing whether or not they upset Islamist psychopaths, or anyone else for that matter.  Being a stalwart ally of Israel, for instance.  

I&#039;m just pointing to the obvious:  our foreign policy has consequences, both good AND bad.  Al Queda didn&#039;t attack us on 9/11 because of &quot;internationalism&quot; as Thornton bizarrely states, any more than because they &quot;hate us for our freedom.&quot;  They attacked us - and continue to attack us - for aspects of our foreign policy, ones which you point out.

Those foreign policy interests may very well be worth pursuing even if it means we are at war with this group.  But when we are forbidden to discuss these costs for fear of sounding like we are &quot;blaming&quot; America, we can not rationally assess if pursuing certain interests are worthwhile.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So, according to you, we should have allowed Saddam to take Kuwait . And then Saudi Arabia &#8230; and then what?&#8221;</p>
<p>Not at all.  There are many American interests (and values) worth pursuing whether or not they upset Islamist psychopaths, or anyone else for that matter.  Being a stalwart ally of Israel, for instance.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m just pointing to the obvious:  our foreign policy has consequences, both good AND bad.  Al Queda didn&#8217;t attack us on 9/11 because of &#8220;internationalism&#8221; as Thornton bizarrely states, any more than because they &#8220;hate us for our freedom.&#8221;  They attacked us &#8211; and continue to attack us &#8211; for aspects of our foreign policy, ones which you point out.</p>
<p>Those foreign policy interests may very well be worth pursuing even if it means we are at war with this group.  But when we are forbidden to discuss these costs for fear of sounding like we are &#8220;blaming&#8221; America, we can not rationally assess if pursuing certain interests are worthwhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aizino Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5273416</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aizino Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5273416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Caveat: a warning enjoining one from certain acts or practices

I think I said it correctly.  I was for it 2 years ago when we left Iraq and shifted troops to Jordan.  But since then I have seen Al Qaeda establish a presence and grow. And Al Nusrah and even the FSA can&#039;t seem to discipline themselves for one day and not kill Christians or Kurds. They cannot practice Taqiyya long enough to get total U.S. support, wipe and Assad and then and only then wipe out the Christians. Al Nusrah and ilk cannot help themselves. Their evil nature shines thru.

As much as I want to see Iran&#039;s evil leadership hurt with the loss of the Assad regime, I believe the minority communities are safer under Assad.    We&#039;ll have to wait to get the Iranian regime another day.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caveat: a warning enjoining one from certain acts or practices</p>
<p>I think I said it correctly.  I was for it 2 years ago when we left Iraq and shifted troops to Jordan.  But since then I have seen Al Qaeda establish a presence and grow. And Al Nusrah and even the FSA can&#8217;t seem to discipline themselves for one day and not kill Christians or Kurds. They cannot practice Taqiyya long enough to get total U.S. support, wipe and Assad and then and only then wipe out the Christians. Al Nusrah and ilk cannot help themselves. Their evil nature shines thru.</p>
<p>As much as I want to see Iran&#8217;s evil leadership hurt with the loss of the Assad regime, I believe the minority communities are safer under Assad.    We&#8217;ll have to wait to get the Iranian regime another day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8ball</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5273403</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[8ball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5273403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Edit your post from 8 hours ago which says you would get involved.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edit your post from 8 hours ago which says you would get involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8ball</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5273401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[8ball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5273401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still want to &quot;get involved&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still want to &#8220;get involved&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8ball</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5273400</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[8ball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5273400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I would get involved. Getting rid of Assad would doom Iran and Hezbollah&quot;


Doom Iran and Hezbollah? How? Are you on drugs? 


&quot;There are 2 caveats.
First, I do not want to see Assad toppled to be replaced by the Muslim Brotherhood or Al Qaeda&quot;


That&#039;s exactly who would replace Assad.


&quot;Al Qaeda would probably, eventually be run out of town. But it would be after they kill all the minorities in the meantime. The Muslim Brotherhood would probably come out on top,&quot;



So, are you still on drugs and in favor of intervention? 

&quot;Second, I do not want to get into a war where the left either sabotages the war effort or holds it hostage as a bargaining chip so they get their domestic agenda. they have done or tried both&quot;



Don&#039;t worry the left won&#039;t protest the war until the first fatality.


I suggest you look up the meaning of the word caveat. It does not mean. &quot;I withdraw that and agree it would be insane to attack Assad. &quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I would get involved. Getting rid of Assad would doom Iran and Hezbollah&#8221;</p>
<p>Doom Iran and Hezbollah? How? Are you on drugs? </p>
<p>&#8220;There are 2 caveats.<br />
First, I do not want to see Assad toppled to be replaced by the Muslim Brotherhood or Al Qaeda&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s exactly who would replace Assad.</p>
<p>&#8220;Al Qaeda would probably, eventually be run out of town. But it would be after they kill all the minorities in the meantime. The Muslim Brotherhood would probably come out on top,&#8221;</p>
<p>So, are you still on drugs and in favor of intervention? </p>
<p>&#8220;Second, I do not want to get into a war where the left either sabotages the war effort or holds it hostage as a bargaining chip so they get their domestic agenda. they have done or tried both&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry the left won&#8217;t protest the war until the first fatality.</p>
<p>I suggest you look up the meaning of the word caveat. It does not mean. &#8220;I withdraw that and agree it would be insane to attack Assad. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5273395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5273395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stop spamming, bitch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop spamming, bitch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goldcoaster</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5273392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goldcoaster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5273392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[obama Needs Help Funding WWIII.

Great video, Here is How You Can Help!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-sdO6pwVHQ&amp;feature=c4-overview&amp;list=UUzkcuUgsMln4y_aSxhE0H-g]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>obama Needs Help Funding WWIII.</p>
<p>Great video, Here is How You Can Help!</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-sdO6pwVHQ&#038;feature=c4-overview&#038;list=UUzkcuUgsMln4y_aSxhE0H-g" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-sdO6pwVHQ&#038;feature=c4-overview&#038;list=UUzkcuUgsMln4y_aSxhE0H-g</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8ball</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5273391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[8ball]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5273391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Internationalism&quot; didn&#039;t contribute to 9/11. Al Queda didn&#039;t bring down the twin towers to protest the SALT II, NATO, NAFTA or Doctors Without Borders. It was in response to our military, economic and political dominance of Muslim lands&quot;.



Bin Laden had no problem accepting our military support in Afghanistan when the mujahudeen fought the Russians. He didn&#039;t attack because of the use of America&#039;s Air Force to protect Muslims in Kosovo.Bin Laden was a Muslim imperialist and supremacist.  He lamented the loss of Andalusia (in 1492) and he wanted to take revenge for  the presence of American troops in the Muslim Holy Land of Saudia Arabia - where we were stationed   to enforce the No Fly Zone and protect Muslims in Iraq. 


So, according to you,  we should have allowed Saddam to take Kuwait . And then Saudi Arabia ... and then what? 
The Middle East was once Christian and Jewish.  Muslims are apoplectic that after the Holocaust Jews have been afforded  a tiny little area.  Islam is spreading wherever there is weakness. People such as yourself who are ignorant of the history of Islam are enemies of freedom.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Internationalism&#8221; didn&#8217;t contribute to 9/11. Al Queda didn&#8217;t bring down the twin towers to protest the SALT II, NATO, NAFTA or Doctors Without Borders. It was in response to our military, economic and political dominance of Muslim lands&#8221;.</p>
<p>Bin Laden had no problem accepting our military support in Afghanistan when the mujahudeen fought the Russians. He didn&#8217;t attack because of the use of America&#8217;s Air Force to protect Muslims in Kosovo.Bin Laden was a Muslim imperialist and supremacist.  He lamented the loss of Andalusia (in 1492) and he wanted to take revenge for  the presence of American troops in the Muslim Holy Land of Saudia Arabia &#8211; where we were stationed   to enforce the No Fly Zone and protect Muslims in Iraq. </p>
<p>So, according to you,  we should have allowed Saddam to take Kuwait . And then Saudi Arabia &#8230; and then what?<br />
The Middle East was once Christian and Jewish.  Muslims are apoplectic that after the Holocaust Jews have been afforded  a tiny little area.  Islam is spreading wherever there is weakness. People such as yourself who are ignorant of the history of Islam are enemies of freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 11bravo</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5273385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[11bravo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5273385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Bruce,
These guys are good om their feet, I mean, you know. Putin knows a commie when he sees one. Why not make him look good since the alternative (Cruz) would not stand for such nonsense.
When the Rooskies bail you out - Amerca knows. O = dead!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bruce,<br />
These guys are good om their feet, I mean, you know. Putin knows a commie when he sees one. Why not make him look good since the alternative (Cruz) would not stand for such nonsense.<br />
When the Rooskies bail you out &#8211; Amerca knows. O = dead!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarlyBird</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5331133</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EarlyBird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5331133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Any way to cut and slice it, your hero Obummer has fked up foreign policy to the point that it cannot be fixed.&#039;
The world is in chaos, Killer. We&#039;re living in history that no individual or nation can control.  We&#039;ve discussed this.  

Do I think that Obama has blundered into this issue with Syria?  Yes.  He should never have committed America to enforcing &quot;red lines&quot; in that nation.  He should have leaned on Russia and the Arab League and the UN to deal with it, while keeping the US out of it.  There is no upside to our getting involved there.  

&quot;We should never go to war unless you so mercilessly grind your opponent into the ground that future conflict is impossible,...&quot;

That depends upon the stakes and the goals.  Some times a little war may be preferable than total war.  Imagine if Reagen had &quot;mercilessly ground&quot; Gadaffi into the ground in the &#039;80s, rather than merely bombed his ugly a$$?  We&#039;d have put that nation into the same chaos it is now in, only back then.
&quot;...the Bush policy of nation building was a failure...&quot; Sure was.  
&quot;...and Obummers policy of appeasement at any price,,,&quot; Absurd.  

&quot;Mubarak in power was to our advantage...&quot; 
Until the Egyptian people threw his ass out.  At that point we could only boldly do AQ&#039;s PR by showing  the world that we were behind a bloody, brual crackdown on &quot;Muslims&quot;  and &quot;Arabs,&quot; not just the MB.  Remember, it was hardly only the MB who wanted Mubarak out. The entire country did. 

You&#039;re imagining that things could be nicely under control and safe and peaceful if only we had the right president.  That&#039;s a fantasy. That region is going to go through its wars and chaos with our without us, and we&#039;re going to be threatened by Muslim psychos, for the rest of our lives.  It&#039;s a matter of managing that threat to the greatest degree possible, and generally speaking, less is more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Any way to cut and slice it, your hero Obummer has fked up foreign policy to the point that it cannot be fixed.&#8217;<br />
The world is in chaos, Killer. We&#8217;re living in history that no individual or nation can control.  We&#8217;ve discussed this.  </p>
<p>Do I think that Obama has blundered into this issue with Syria?  Yes.  He should never have committed America to enforcing &#8220;red lines&#8221; in that nation.  He should have leaned on Russia and the Arab League and the UN to deal with it, while keeping the US out of it.  There is no upside to our getting involved there.  </p>
<p>&#8220;We should never go to war unless you so mercilessly grind your opponent into the ground that future conflict is impossible,&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>That depends upon the stakes and the goals.  Some times a little war may be preferable than total war.  Imagine if Reagen had &#8220;mercilessly ground&#8221; Gadaffi into the ground in the &#8217;80s, rather than merely bombed his ugly a$$?  We&#8217;d have put that nation into the same chaos it is now in, only back then.<br />
&#8220;&#8230;the Bush policy of nation building was a failure&#8230;&#8221; Sure was.<br />
&#8220;&#8230;and Obummers policy of appeasement at any price,,,&#8221; Absurd.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Mubarak in power was to our advantage&#8230;&#8221;<br />
Until the Egyptian people threw his ass out.  At that point we could only boldly do AQ&#8217;s PR by showing  the world that we were behind a bloody, brual crackdown on &#8220;Muslims&#8221;  and &#8220;Arabs,&#8221; not just the MB.  Remember, it was hardly only the MB who wanted Mubarak out. The entire country did. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re imagining that things could be nicely under control and safe and peaceful if only we had the right president.  That&#8217;s a fantasy. That region is going to go through its wars and chaos with our without us, and we&#8217;re going to be threatened by Muslim psychos, for the rest of our lives.  It&#8217;s a matter of managing that threat to the greatest degree possible, and generally speaking, less is more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drakken</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/bruce-thornton/fifteen-minutes-of-foreign-policy-malfeasance/comment-page-1/#comment-5273264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drakken]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=203780#comment-5273264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Any way to cut and slice it, your hero Obummer has fked up foreign policy to the point that it cannot be fixed. We should never go to war unless you so mercilessly grind your opponent into the ground that future conflict is impossible, the Bush policy of nation building was a failure and Obummers policy of appeasement at any price is making it much worse. Mubarak in power was to our advantage and frankly I don&#039;t give a rats azz how many of the bloody savages Mubarak sent to their virgins, he was at least our ally and kept the peace, all the MB as done is destabilize the ME to the point that war is now inevitable. No matter what your hero obummer does now at this point will change that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any way to cut and slice it, your hero Obummer has fked up foreign policy to the point that it cannot be fixed. We should never go to war unless you so mercilessly grind your opponent into the ground that future conflict is impossible, the Bush policy of nation building was a failure and Obummers policy of appeasement at any price is making it much worse. Mubarak in power was to our advantage and frankly I don&#8217;t give a rats azz how many of the bloody savages Mubarak sent to their virgins, he was at least our ally and kept the peace, all the MB as done is destabilize the ME to the point that war is now inevitable. No matter what your hero obummer does now at this point will change that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 703/745 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 16:26:18 by W3 Total Cache -->