<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Road to Nowhere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-road-to-nowhere</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 04:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Stamford</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5496947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck Stamford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2014 10:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5496947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the saddest things I&#039;ve ever read.  Drives home the scope of the promise, the suffering to bring that promise to fruition, and the total failure to do so due to the incoherence inherent in the promise from the moment it was made.  Left me believing socialism/liberalism is more a cognitive pathology than a well thought out political philosophy.  It made it difficult for me not to see socialism as what is left to mankind after mankind rejects God, which is to say, nothing but horror after horror.  Put another way, the results of adopting socialism amount to one of the best arguments FOR a loving, personal God&#039;s existence I&#039;ve ever seen!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the saddest things I&#8217;ve ever read.  Drives home the scope of the promise, the suffering to bring that promise to fruition, and the total failure to do so due to the incoherence inherent in the promise from the moment it was made.  Left me believing socialism/liberalism is more a cognitive pathology than a well thought out political philosophy.  It made it difficult for me not to see socialism as what is left to mankind after mankind rejects God, which is to say, nothing but horror after horror.  Put another way, the results of adopting socialism amount to one of the best arguments FOR a loving, personal God&#8217;s existence I&#8217;ve ever seen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MLCBLOG</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5304881</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MLCBLOG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2013 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5304881</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chez, While I am a fan of yours, I find I must speak up for us born-again Christians.  I thought you were a bit unfeeling about us.  The question is highly complex, possibly the most complex one that we humans deal with.

Here&#039;s my take.  You and David, as Jews are God&#039;s chosen people and he has a plan for you to be glorious and with him in the last days of all this.  We, as Christians were allowed in on this by our prophet, the wonderful Jesus of Nazareth.  Without him, we had no entry to heaven or to a happy life here.  As for the rest of the people, it seems we are all supposed to be trying to reach them with God&#039;s love rather than be exclusive about it.  I was saddened by your take on this, probably just a toss-off remark between you and a fellow Jew.  I bet you didn&#039;t mean anything by it.

Incidentally, I differ with most of my fellow Christians on the question of whether we need to prosyletize you (I admit I am assuming you are Jewish by your remark, as in &quot;Everyone knows...&quot; (that there beliefs are futile.   Common sense would dictate otherwise, which of course disregards the spiritual possibilities).

I think God has a plan to restore Jews to glory and humility and obedience even.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chez, While I am a fan of yours, I find I must speak up for us born-again Christians.  I thought you were a bit unfeeling about us.  The question is highly complex, possibly the most complex one that we humans deal with.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my take.  You and David, as Jews are God&#8217;s chosen people and he has a plan for you to be glorious and with him in the last days of all this.  We, as Christians were allowed in on this by our prophet, the wonderful Jesus of Nazareth.  Without him, we had no entry to heaven or to a happy life here.  As for the rest of the people, it seems we are all supposed to be trying to reach them with God&#8217;s love rather than be exclusive about it.  I was saddened by your take on this, probably just a toss-off remark between you and a fellow Jew.  I bet you didn&#8217;t mean anything by it.</p>
<p>Incidentally, I differ with most of my fellow Christians on the question of whether we need to prosyletize you (I admit I am assuming you are Jewish by your remark, as in &#8220;Everyone knows&#8230;&#8221; (that there beliefs are futile.   Common sense would dictate otherwise, which of course disregards the spiritual possibilities).</p>
<p>I think God has a plan to restore Jews to glory and humility and obedience even.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCraigen</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5293793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RCraigen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 03:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5293793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s not about any entitlement of the book, TB, or that West should be immune from criticism.  It&#039;s about the nature of the review and the behavior of the FPM crowd in the whole affair.  Even if they had been correct in all their specific criticisms (a few do seem to have some basis, and are probably worth discussing), their behavior was of a sort to try to close down debate.  To have behaved in this matter concerning a book whose thesis radically changes discourse about that era really creates questions that cannot simply be ignored.  I detect goaltending, not scholarly debate (which I, for one, would welcome), and it remains highly unsettling.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not about any entitlement of the book, TB, or that West should be immune from criticism.  It&#8217;s about the nature of the review and the behavior of the FPM crowd in the whole affair.  Even if they had been correct in all their specific criticisms (a few do seem to have some basis, and are probably worth discussing), their behavior was of a sort to try to close down debate.  To have behaved in this matter concerning a book whose thesis radically changes discourse about that era really creates questions that cannot simply be ignored.  I detect goaltending, not scholarly debate (which I, for one, would welcome), and it remains highly unsettling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5293778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 03:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5293778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you going to bring up this disputed book review forever? Is there an intellectual right of entitlement that those charged with reviewing books must honor? Can&#039;t anyone disagree strongly with a writer....even Diana West?


Maybe it&#039;s time to move on. There are many things that are far more important than that book review.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you going to bring up this disputed book review forever? Is there an intellectual right of entitlement that those charged with reviewing books must honor? Can&#8217;t anyone disagree strongly with a writer&#8230;.even Diana West?</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s time to move on. There are many things that are far more important than that book review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5293780</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 03:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5293780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Likewise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Likewise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5293775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 03:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5293775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What exactly are you talking about...or did I ask the wrong person? 


You didn&#039;t answer me on even one one point. That much was clear from your odd response.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly are you talking about&#8230;or did I ask the wrong person? </p>
<p>You didn&#8217;t answer me on even one one point. That much was clear from your odd response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5293532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5293532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TB:  &quot;Her book was about communists in our government, but if communism is dead, her book is nothing more than coffee table political paleontology. If the threat is gone, what is the reason for the uproar?&quot;


Don&#039;t worry.  You&#039;re only about forty years behind the times.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TB:  &#8220;Her book was about communists in our government, but if communism is dead, her book is nothing more than coffee table political paleontology. If the threat is gone, what is the reason for the uproar?&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry.  You&#8217;re only about forty years behind the times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5293529</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5293529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TP:  &quot; I see morality as a process of becoming, not a final perfect state.&quot;


Don&#039;t give up!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TP:  &#8221; I see morality as a process of becoming, not a final perfect state.&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t give up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5293516</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5293516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Neo-Conservatives?&quot;

Only in the minds of doctrinaire libertarians who can&#039;t differentiate between great evil and political viewpoints that, while conservative, aren&#039;t rigidly adhering to the inviolate rules they self-righteously established. 


The particular type of libertarian I refer to is like a turtle that lives in a huge sea, filled with predators, so in order to preserve its delusion of isolation, pretends to swim while its head and feet are tucked tightly inside of its shell. That makes it a sitting duck and a turtle.



You are aware that Obama and all of his minions are communists, right? You are aware that our media is Obama&#039;s Pravda, right? Communism isn&#039;t dead, it just killed off its hosts. 


If, as you assert, &quot;communism is dead,&quot; why were you all up in arms about the West review? Her book was about communists in our government, but if communism is dead, her book is nothing more than coffee table political paleontology. If the threat is gone, what is the reason for the uproar?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Neo-Conservatives?&#8221;</p>
<p>Only in the minds of doctrinaire libertarians who can&#8217;t differentiate between great evil and political viewpoints that, while conservative, aren&#8217;t rigidly adhering to the inviolate rules they self-righteously established. </p>
<p>The particular type of libertarian I refer to is like a turtle that lives in a huge sea, filled with predators, so in order to preserve its delusion of isolation, pretends to swim while its head and feet are tucked tightly inside of its shell. That makes it a sitting duck and a turtle.</p>
<p>You are aware that Obama and all of his minions are communists, right? You are aware that our media is Obama&#8217;s Pravda, right? Communism isn&#8217;t dead, it just killed off its hosts. </p>
<p>If, as you assert, &#8220;communism is dead,&#8221; why were you all up in arms about the West review? Her book was about communists in our government, but if communism is dead, her book is nothing more than coffee table political paleontology. If the threat is gone, what is the reason for the uproar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5293498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5293498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Normally I find myself in disagreement with almost everything you post, if not with the content then with the tone.&quot;


When we were debating the Diana West book review flap, you stated that you usually agree with me. Which is it, or is consistency an acceptable casualty to dogmatism?


Funny that you would object to people being &quot;preachy and self-righteous,&quot; coming from a person who annointed himself the  &quot;Authentic American conservative.&quot; among many other examples. You went so far as to cast aspersions on Horowitz and imply that he is still a Leftist. What do you call that?


Striving for moral perfection is not the same as attaining it. No one ever attains perfection in this world, but it is the striving that is important. In other words, what one wills is what is in your heart, and if what you will is good, then you improve the world. If what you will is evil, then you cause harm and suffering. Collectively willing evil, eg. Islam, Nazism, Marxism, etc. creates exponentially greater harm.


I strive toward moral rectitude, but as I said, we all fall short. &quot;The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak.&quot; I don&#039;t like the word &quot;perfection&quot; in this context, but was responding to your use of it in describing what you see as America&#039;s quest. That being said, I&#039;m not afraid to say that the alternative to striving for moral perfection, willingly acting immorally or amorally, as a majority, is ultimately what is destroying this culture, much like it has destroyed great cultures before. I see morality as a process of becoming, not a final perfect state.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Normally I find myself in disagreement with almost everything you post, if not with the content then with the tone.&#8221;</p>
<p>When we were debating the Diana West book review flap, you stated that you usually agree with me. Which is it, or is consistency an acceptable casualty to dogmatism?</p>
<p>Funny that you would object to people being &#8220;preachy and self-righteous,&#8221; coming from a person who annointed himself the  &#8220;Authentic American conservative.&#8221; among many other examples. You went so far as to cast aspersions on Horowitz and imply that he is still a Leftist. What do you call that?</p>
<p>Striving for moral perfection is not the same as attaining it. No one ever attains perfection in this world, but it is the striving that is important. In other words, what one wills is what is in your heart, and if what you will is good, then you improve the world. If what you will is evil, then you cause harm and suffering. Collectively willing evil, eg. Islam, Nazism, Marxism, etc. creates exponentially greater harm.</p>
<p>I strive toward moral rectitude, but as I said, we all fall short. &#8220;The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak.&#8221; I don&#8217;t like the word &#8220;perfection&#8221; in this context, but was responding to your use of it in describing what you see as America&#8217;s quest. That being said, I&#8217;m not afraid to say that the alternative to striving for moral perfection, willingly acting immorally or amorally, as a majority, is ultimately what is destroying this culture, much like it has destroyed great cultures before. I see morality as a process of becoming, not a final perfect state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NAHALKIDES</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5292682</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NAHALKIDES]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5292682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No - the New Left, having completed its long march through the institutions, and now occupying the White House in the person of Barry Hussein Obama.  American idealism was based on freedom, i.e. capitalism, whereas socialism is based on changing man through brute force.  American idealism would be better termed &quot;optimism&quot; rather than &quot;utopianism&quot;, a word that describes the socialist ideal since it can&#039;t ever be realized.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No &#8211; the New Left, having completed its long march through the institutions, and now occupying the White House in the person of Barry Hussein Obama.  American idealism was based on freedom, i.e. capitalism, whereas socialism is based on changing man through brute force.  American idealism would be better termed &#8220;optimism&#8221; rather than &#8220;utopianism&#8221;, a word that describes the socialist ideal since it can&#8217;t ever be realized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herb benty</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5292679</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[herb benty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 01:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5292679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rvastar! Thank you very much for putting into words what I was scratching around the edges for. Soros, Buffet, Gates, Gore etc.etc., The low-infos just can&#039;t see that it is far better for all to create wealth than to just use wealth taken from someone. Good stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rvastar! Thank you very much for putting into words what I was scratching around the edges for. Soros, Buffet, Gates, Gore etc.etc., The low-infos just can&#8217;t see that it is far better for all to create wealth than to just use wealth taken from someone. Good stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: musimann</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5292590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[musimann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5292590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well if it is true he certainly didn&#039;t give to the Khazars today pretending to be Abraham&#039;s offspring. Yeshua warned everyone to beware of the leaven of the Pharisees - everyone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if it is true he certainly didn&#8217;t give to the Khazars today pretending to be Abraham&#8217;s offspring. Yeshua warned everyone to beware of the leaven of the Pharisees &#8211; everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: musimann</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5292559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[musimann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 00:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5292559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amusing article. As in depth as it was, it never mentions once the Jewish role in the &quot;Bolshevik Revolution.&quot; You want to talk about a real holocaust, look at what the Jews did in Russia. 20 million Christians dead. 60 million overall. Compare that to the 230,00 that really died in Auschwitz (mostly from disease) and the holocaust industry still milked by the Jews today. Guess even a former comrade can&#039;t handle the truth. But these days most are brainwashed by 50 years of Jewish Zionist propaganda.

Rabbi Stephen Wise : &quot;Some call it Marxism [communism], I call it Judaism&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amusing article. As in depth as it was, it never mentions once the Jewish role in the &#8220;Bolshevik Revolution.&#8221; You want to talk about a real holocaust, look at what the Jews did in Russia. 20 million Christians dead. 60 million overall. Compare that to the 230,00 that really died in Auschwitz (mostly from disease) and the holocaust industry still milked by the Jews today. Guess even a former comrade can&#8217;t handle the truth. But these days most are brainwashed by 50 years of Jewish Zionist propaganda.</p>
<p>Rabbi Stephen Wise : &#8220;Some call it Marxism [communism], I call it Judaism&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5292527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5292527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TB:  &quot;Morality is the human survival code and it is moral perfection that people need to strive for most.&quot;

&quot;Libertarianism is entirely dependent on the great majority of citizens being of superior moral nature.&quot;



Normally I find myself in disagreement with you on almost everything you post, if not with the content then with the tone.  Although I find your tone in this case rather preachy and self-righteous, overall I am more or less in agreement with you on this issue.


Not only was Adam Smith regarded as the greatest economist of his day; he was also regarded as one its finest moralists.  As Adam Smith knew very well, free market economics cannot operate for the benefit of morality in the absence of morality.  He was not advocating a Darwinist Capitalism of kill or be killed.  He was advocating a rational system for optimizing the wealth of nations, and no one realized more than he did that the application of universal moral values was essential for all industrial activity and all commercial transactions.  Today, we might call it &quot;good faith&quot;, but personally I think that the more traditional term morality hits the right note.


Unfortunately, moral perfection is not easily attained, and for most of us, it is the most difficult task of all. How are you doing in your quest for moral perfection?  How do you know when you&#039;re getting it right and when you&#039;re not? What examples or sources are you guided by?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TB:  &#8220;Morality is the human survival code and it is moral perfection that people need to strive for most.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Libertarianism is entirely dependent on the great majority of citizens being of superior moral nature.&#8221;</p>
<p>Normally I find myself in disagreement with you on almost everything you post, if not with the content then with the tone.  Although I find your tone in this case rather preachy and self-righteous, overall I am more or less in agreement with you on this issue.</p>
<p>Not only was Adam Smith regarded as the greatest economist of his day; he was also regarded as one its finest moralists.  As Adam Smith knew very well, free market economics cannot operate for the benefit of morality in the absence of morality.  He was not advocating a Darwinist Capitalism of kill or be killed.  He was advocating a rational system for optimizing the wealth of nations, and no one realized more than he did that the application of universal moral values was essential for all industrial activity and all commercial transactions.  Today, we might call it &#8220;good faith&#8221;, but personally I think that the more traditional term morality hits the right note.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, moral perfection is not easily attained, and for most of us, it is the most difficult task of all. How are you doing in your quest for moral perfection?  How do you know when you&#8217;re getting it right and when you&#8217;re not? What examples or sources are you guided by?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fish</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5292526</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5292526</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our solidarity was given to Communist states in their potential.


Moses went up from the steppes of Moab to Mount Nebo, to the summit of Pisgah, opposite Jericho, and the Lord showed hi the whole land: Gilead as far as Dan, all Napthali, the land of Ephraim and Manasseh, the whole land of Judah as far as the Western Sea, the Negeb, and the Plain - the valley of Jericho, the city of palm trees - as far as Zoar. And the Lord said to him, THIS IS THE LAND which I swore to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, I will assign it to your offspring. I HAVE LET YOU SEE IT WITH YOUR OWN EYES  BUT YOU SHALL NOT CROSS OVER THERE.


Thus the story ends.


When will the Messiah come? He who says, does not know, and he who knows, does not say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our solidarity was given to Communist states in their potential.</p>
<p>Moses went up from the steppes of Moab to Mount Nebo, to the summit of Pisgah, opposite Jericho, and the Lord showed hi the whole land: Gilead as far as Dan, all Napthali, the land of Ephraim and Manasseh, the whole land of Judah as far as the Western Sea, the Negeb, and the Plain &#8211; the valley of Jericho, the city of palm trees &#8211; as far as Zoar. And the Lord said to him, THIS IS THE LAND which I swore to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, I will assign it to your offspring. I HAVE LET YOU SEE IT WITH YOUR OWN EYES  BUT YOU SHALL NOT CROSS OVER THERE.</p>
<p>Thus the story ends.</p>
<p>When will the Messiah come? He who says, does not know, and he who knows, does not say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boeningsol321</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5292513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boeningsol321]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 23:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5292513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[my Aunty Elena got a real nice Porsche Boxster by working
off of a computer... Read Full Report T­e­c­7­0­.­ℂ­o­m]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my Aunty Elena got a real nice Porsche Boxster by working<br />
off of a computer&#8230; Read Full Report T­e­c­7­0­.­ℂ­o­m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCraigen</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5292497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RCraigen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5292497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A magnificant magnus opus, Mr. Horowitz and a lovely reminder why I have always regarded your work so highly.  This may be the best summary, in as many lines, as I have ever read of the failure of the communist experiment and the rationale for placing its culpability at the feet of the leftist intellectual elite.  Well done, and thanks for dusting it off for us who have come more lately to appreciate your work.


It is all the more stark, upon reading this, to consider what you and your colleagues have done to the work of Diana West.  Against your protestations I can find no rational basis for the criticism -- at best a few minor nits to pick, certainly nothing justifying the wholesale attempt at shaming and disenfranchisement that we witnessed over the last couple of months.  Your voice is plain and your insight clear in this essay.  Has your understanding been frozen in time, unable to assimilate new or divergent analysis as one finds in the new generation of analysis of WWI and Cold War?  West&#039;s analysis is of particular importance because she discerns important patterns that can be applied to current responses to Islam from the historical kid-gloves approach to Communism by key government officials in the past.  This is, after all, the point of history -- to learn and inform our choices for the future.  If there are academic caveats, they must be discussed on a rational, and civil plane, not on a &quot;She should not have written this book&quot; (and other, more nasty sleights, including some very uncivil ad hominem).  


I am saving your essay here, as a true masterwork, and have already been commending it to folks with whom I have ongoing discussions about these matters, to help frame our discourse.  But I don&#039;t consider the West issue to have been appropriately closed, and this casts a shadow over such things.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A magnificant magnus opus, Mr. Horowitz and a lovely reminder why I have always regarded your work so highly.  This may be the best summary, in as many lines, as I have ever read of the failure of the communist experiment and the rationale for placing its culpability at the feet of the leftist intellectual elite.  Well done, and thanks for dusting it off for us who have come more lately to appreciate your work.</p>
<p>It is all the more stark, upon reading this, to consider what you and your colleagues have done to the work of Diana West.  Against your protestations I can find no rational basis for the criticism &#8212; at best a few minor nits to pick, certainly nothing justifying the wholesale attempt at shaming and disenfranchisement that we witnessed over the last couple of months.  Your voice is plain and your insight clear in this essay.  Has your understanding been frozen in time, unable to assimilate new or divergent analysis as one finds in the new generation of analysis of WWI and Cold War?  West&#8217;s analysis is of particular importance because she discerns important patterns that can be applied to current responses to Islam from the historical kid-gloves approach to Communism by key government officials in the past.  This is, after all, the point of history &#8212; to learn and inform our choices for the future.  If there are academic caveats, they must be discussed on a rational, and civil plane, not on a &#8220;She should not have written this book&#8221; (and other, more nasty sleights, including some very uncivil ad hominem).  </p>
<p>I am saving your essay here, as a true masterwork, and have already been commending it to folks with whom I have ongoing discussions about these matters, to help frame our discourse.  But I don&#8217;t consider the West issue to have been appropriately closed, and this casts a shadow over such things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notmybrotherskeeper2</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5292461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Notmybrotherskeeper2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 22:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5292461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well said. Things are surely crazy, up is now down, wrong is now right, etc, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. Things are surely crazy, up is now down, wrong is now right, etc, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Texas Patriot</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-road-to-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-5292450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Texas Patriot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=207161#comment-5292450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TB: &quot;You&#039;re wrong. It has morphed into a yet more cynical and dangerous force.&quot;

Neo-Conservatives?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TB: &#8220;You&#8217;re wrong. It has morphed into a yet more cynical and dangerous force.&#8221;</p>
<p>Neo-Conservatives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 733/782 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 23:05:30 by W3 Total Cache -->