The Threat We Face

obama33Below is a speech given by David Horowitz at the Kohler conference of the Bradley Foundation. It has been revised and edited for publication as an article.

I was born at the beginning of the Second World War into a family of high school teachers who were members of the Communist Party, and therefore were actually part of a vast conspiracy dedicated to the destruction of this country, although they would never have looked at it that way, and so-called liberals would be the first to deny it.

In those days, the schools were old fashioned enough that my parents did not use their classrooms to indoctrinate students as tens of thousands of university professors and even more K-12 teachers regularly do today. It is also an unhappy but hugely important fact that the conspiracy to which my parents belonged has steadily migrated into the heart of the Democratic Party until it now occupies the Oval Office in the person of our president, Barack Obama, and his closest advisors.

The president, his chief operative Valerie Jarrett and his chief political strategist David Axelrod all came out of the same Communist left and the same radical new left as I did, and all have remained heart and soul a part of it. As someone who turned his back on that destructive movement, I can say with confidence that they have not. If a person belongs to an organization or is the supporter of an idea that they come to see as destructive or evil, the first thing they will want to do when they leave is to warn others against it, to warn them of the dangers it represents. If a person does not do this – that tells me that he or she hasn’t left the destructive movement or abandoned the pernicious idea but has just put another face on them. Instead of calling themselves communists or socialists they call themselves liberals and progressives. This camouflage is very old. I never once heard my parents and their party friends refer to themselves as Communists. They were progressives – and registered Democrats.

This is why – to take one disturbing example, I know that Hillary Clinton’s right hand, Huma Abedin, the former deputy secretary of state, and chief foreign policy adviser on Muslim Affairs is a Muslim Brotherhood operative. Huma Abedin’s late father was a Muslim Brotherhood leader, and her mother and brother still are. For 12 years until the moment she was hired by Hillary, Huma Abedin worked for Abdullah Omar Naseef, one of the top three funders of Osama Bin Laden who is still wanted by our government for his role in the 9/11 attacks.

Huma Abedin has never to my knowledge uttered a word of disapproval about the Muslim Brotherhood’s desire to rid the world of Christians and Jews or to bring all infidels under the heel of totalitarian Islamic law. Her spiritual adviser Yusef al-Qaradawi is the spiritual leader of the Brotherhood. Qaradawi has publicly said that the Holocaust of the Jews was God’s punishment for their corruption, and that it would come again, and when it did, “Allah willing it will be at the hands of the believers.” Huma Abedin has not broken her relations with this evil man or dissociated herself from his genocidal remarks. Nor has she opposed the policies enacted by Obama and Hillary, which have supported the Muslim Brotherhood at home and in the Middle East.

On the contrary. when the Obama administration supported the Brotherhood’s rise to power in Egypt, Huma Abedin was our government’s key adviser on Muslim affairs. She was at Hillary’s side when security was not provided to our diplomatic complex in Benghazi and when al-Qaeda fanatics murdered our Ambassador. The murder of Ambassador Stevens led to the most shameful presidential act in our history when the President turned his back on the cries for help of three American heroes who served him and who were in a desperate fight for their lives. It is a time honored American code never to abandon our warriors on the field of battle. But America’s commander-in-chief turned his back on these brave fighting men and left them to die; and then lied to the American people to cover up his crime.

Ever since Barack Obama was elected and began his radical course, American conservatives have been in a state of shock, as though they couldn’t quite believe what was happening. Until then there had been a general collusion in the practiced deceptions of the left as commentators on all sides would refer to unrepentant radicals, and dedicated socialists as “liberals,” and turn half blind eyes to their anti-American agendas. What is “liberal” about the mean-spirited intolerant people of the left, except their attitude to hard drugs, sex, and criminal behavior? Oh yes, and spending other people’s money?

Today the Obama juggernaut is systematically bankrupting our country, and undoing our constitutional arrangements. Its contempt for consultative and representative government is relentlessly on display. This week Senate Majority leader Harry Reid defended his refusal to negotiate with Republicans over Obamacare and the debt in these words: “We are here to support the federal government. That’s our job.” End quote. Forget about representing the people whom our Founders made sovereign. Forget what America is about.

The fact that I had a radical past allowed me to see much of this coming. But even I never thought we would be looking so soon at the prospect of a one-party state. Those words may sound hyperbolic, but take a moment to think about it. If you have transformed the taxing agency of the state into a political weapon – and Obama has; if you are setting up a massive government program to gather the financial and health information of every citizen, and control their access to care; and if you have a spy agency that can read the mail and listen to the communications of every individual in the country, you don’t really need a secret police to destroy your political opponents. Once you have silenced them, you can proceed with your plans to remake the world in your image.

The good news is that the bad five years we have just been through have aroused a sleeping giant among Americans who didn’t see it coming and couldn’t imagine that it would. For the first time since the Cold War, people with a public voice are calling socialists by their right name; conservatives are finally organizing at the grassroots to defend their freedom; and at last we have leaders who are willing to stand up to the thuggery of the left and who have the spine not to back down.

As a sometime Jonah freed from the whale let me offer some intelligence about the political forces arrayed against us. Do not make the mistake of thinking that progressives and conservatives are people who merely differ about practical agendas. There are four defining features of the left, which distinguish it as a movement of individuals who approach politics quite differently from pragmatically-minded conservatives.

The first of these features is their alienation from country: If you ask progressives about their patriotic feeling, they will tell you that they don’t think of themselves first as Americans but as “citizens of the world.” That even has a Harvard imprimatur. They are, in fact, so profoundly alienated from their country as to be in some sense foreigners to it. They are hostile to its history and to its core values, which they see as reflections of a society that has been guilty of racism and oppression on an epic scale. And they are fundamentally opposed to its constitutional arrangements which the framers specifically designed to thwart what they deemed “wicked projects” to redistribute income and share individual wealth.

This is perhaps the hardest feature of their progressive adversaries for conservatives to comprehend. It is difficult to imagine that people as privileged by America’s generosity as Barack Obama and his entourage of despoilers should be so alienated from their country as to feel themselves in it but not of it. And there is no more shocking example of this than Benghazi. No matter what your politics, or what solutions you propose to the problems that confront this nation, ask yourself this: Could you have done what Barack Obama did that night? Could you as commander-in-chief abandon three Americans fighting for their lives under your command? These men had served their country for more than a decade. For seven hours they cried out for help from their government, but you refused to give it.

How, as a fellow American, could Obama have just left these men to die? No one with an ounce of patriotic feeling could. But he did. Even Alexei Kosygin, the Soviet premier of a Communist dictatorship, maintained contact with his astronaut as he burned up in space. But not our president. When the attack on our embassy in Benghazi began, he hung up the phone and went to bed, and then on to a fundraiser with Beyonce and Jay-Z in Las Vegas in the morning. This, with four Americans including our ambassador dead.

As a nation we are now confronted by mortal enemies in Iran and Syria, in Hizbollah and Hamas – enemies who have openly declared that we are the devil’s party and should be erased from the face of the earth. How could an American president deliberately set out to appease such enemies? How in the face of such threats could he reduce our country to an international laughing stock, no longer respected by our friends, no longer feared by our foes? How could he be so cavalier about having failed so miserably to have defended his country’s security and uphold its honor? How could an American commander-in-chief then put himself in a position to be snubbed by the Iranian Hitlerites, which is what they are, and which is what Obama did? How could he snub our Israeli allies and at the same time grovel before our Islamic enemies? But he did. How could he create a vacuum in the Middle East allowing Russia to become the new regional power? How could he make himself an ally of the Muslim Brotherhood, which slaughters Christians, and promises the extermination of the Jews and spawns terrorist armies like al-Qaeda and Hamas?

The answer to all these questions is that Obama doesn’t identify with our country. He sees himself as a “citizen of the world,” and a redresser of grievances for the suffering he imagines America has inflicted on our adversaries, including Hitlerite Iran.

The second feature of the progressive left that is key to understanding it is its instinctive, practiced, and indispensable dishonesty. As I previously noted, the Communists in the circles I frequented in my youth never identified themselves as Communists but always as “progressives” and “Jeffersonian democrats” (which is the last thing they were). When I was a young man and Stalin was alive, the goal of the Communist Party U.S.A. was a “dictatorship of the proletariat,” and a “Soviet America.” But under Stalin’s inspiration the official slogan of the Communist Party was “Peace, Jobs, and Democracy.”

The lesson? People on the left may be delusional but they are not stupid. They know what they can say and get away with, and what they can’t. Barack Obama is a born and bred member of the left and not coincidentally is the most brazen and compulsive liar ever to occupy the American White House. What other politician could have successfully explained away the fact that two of his closest political confidantes over a twenty-year period were an anti-American racist, Jeremiah Wright and an anti-American terrorist William Ayers?

There is a marked difference between the radicals of the Sixties and the radical movement Obama is part of. In the Sixties, as radicals we said what we thought and blurted out what we wanted. We wanted a revolution, and we wanted it now. It was actually very decent of us to warn others as to what we intended. But because we blurted out our goal, we didn’t get very far. Americans were onto us. Those who remained on the left when the Sixties were over, learned from their experience. They learned to lie. The strategy of the lie is progressives’ new gospel. It is what the progressive bible — Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals — is all about. Alinsky is the acknowledged political mentor to Obama and Hillary, to the service and teacher unions, and to the progressive rank and file. Alinsky understood the mistake Sixties’ radicals had made. His message to this generation is easily summed up: Don’t telegraph your goals; infiltrate their institutions and subvert them; moral principles are disposable fictions; the end justifies the means; and never forget that your political goal is always power.

An SDS radical wrote in the Sixties: “The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution.” The Alinsky version is this: The issue is never the issue; the issue is always power: How to wring power out of the democratic process, how turn the process into an instrument of progressive control. How to use it to fundamentally transform the United States of America — which is exactly what Barack Obama warned he would do on the eve of his election.

The chosen legislative instrument to begin this transformation was Obamacare. It was presented as an act of charity, a plan to cover the uninsured. That was the “issue” as they presented it. But the actual goal of Obamacare’s socialist sponsors was a “single payer system” – government healthcare — which would put the state in control of the lives of every American, man, woman and child. That is the reason that none of the promises made about Obamacare was true, beginning with his campaign lie that Obamacare government health care was not a program he would support. Obamacare will not cover 30 million uninsured Americans, as Obama and the Democrats said it would; Obamacare will not lower costs, as they promised it would; Obamacare will deprive many Americans of their doctors and healthcare plans, as they assured everyone it would not; Obamacare is a new tax, as they swore it wouldn’t be. All these promises Obama and the Democrats made were false because they were only a camouflage for their real goal actual goal, which was universal control.

A third feature of progressives that defines their politics is that they regard the past, which is real, with contempt, and are focused exclusively on a future, which is imaginary.

To understand why this is important, think of progressives as a species of religious fundamentalists planning a redemption. Like fundamentalists they look at the world as fallen – a place corrupted by racism, sexism and class division. But the truly religious understand that we are the source of corruption and that redemption is only possible through the work of a Divinity. In contrast, progressives see themselves as the redeemers, which is why they are so dangerous. Because they regard those who oppose them as the eternally damned. Progressives are on a mission to create the kingdom of heaven on earth by redistributing income and using the state to enforce politically correct attitudes and practices in everyone’s life. They want to control what you do, and who you are, and even what you eat. For your own good, of course.

The fact that they see themselves as saving the world – or “saving the planet” as they would prefer — results in a fourth key characteristic of their politics, which is that they regard politics as a religious war. This explains why they are so rude and nasty when you disagree with them or resist their panaceas (and of course if they had the power, the punishments would be more severe); that is why the politics of personal destruction is their favorite variety, why they are verbal assassins and go directly for the jugular, and why they think nothing of destroying the reputations of their opponents and burying them permanently. And that is why they can perform their character assassinations without regrets – or did I miss Obama’s  apology to Romney for accusing him of killing a woman with cancer during the campaign? Why apologize when you did it for the good of a world transforming cause?

To sum this up: Progressives see themselves as an army of the saints, and their opponents as the party of Satan; and that will justify almost anything you can get away with.

An appalling episode of their Machiavellian politics has shaped the international conflict in which we find ourselves currently impotent in the Middle East. The root of that impotence lies in the way Democrats turned the issue of the Iraq war against the Republican president George Bush. The Democrats’ case against Bush was that he acted unilaterally, deceptively and in haste.

Nothing could be further from the truth. The policy to remove Iraq’s government by force was put in place by a Democratic president, Bill Clinton, when he signed the Iraqi Liberation Act and fired 450 cruise missiles into that sovereign country. He did it, by the way, not only unilaterally but without consulting anyone.

That was in 1998, which is five years before Bush sent American troops into Iraq. Ten months before Bush did that he warned Iraq’s dictator, Saddam Hussein, to obey the Gulf War truce he had signed in 1991 and then repeatedly violated over the next ten years. Seven months before sending our troops into Iraq Bush went personally to the UN and got a unanimous Security Council ultimatum to Saddam. UN Resolution 1447 said: Obey the terms of the Gulf War truce by December 7, 2002 – or else.

Two months before that deadline Bush went to Congress and requested an authorization to use force in the event that Saddam did not voluntarily observe the terms of the UN Resolution, and the Gulf War truce he had signed and then violated.  Both houses of Congress including a majority of the Democrats in the Senate voted to authorize Bush to use force in Iraq. He also got an authorization from NATO and he also formed a coalition of 40 nations, including America’s oldest allies, the Brits, to enforce the UN Security Council ultimatum.

Not only was the decision not made in haste, and not made without consultation, as the Democrats claimed. The truth was just the opposite. The process of making the decision to go to war took 10 months and every significant authority was consulted. But once U.S. troops entered Iraq on March 19, 2003, it took only three months for the Democrats to betray them and their president, to turn their backs on the war they had authorized and supported, and claim it was – to use the words of former Vice President Al Gore, “unnecessary, immoral and illegal.” Or in the words of Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry, “the wrong war, in the wrong place, at the wrong time.”

Why did the Democrats betray the war they had supported? It was not because of any fact on the ground in Iraq, or any principles Bush had allegedly violated. They betrayed our troops and turned on their commander-in-chief for one reason and one reason alone: to gain political power at home.

At the very moment of their treachery a Democratic primary was in progress. An anti-war Democrat – a Sixties leftist named Howard Dean — was on the verge of winning their presidential nomination, burying other candidates like John Kerry and John Edwards in the polls. Until then, Kerry and Edwards were full-throated supporters of the war. Kerry made a speech on the floor of the Senate in support of the bill authorizing the use of force. He explained why the forcible removal of Saddam was necessary to defend the country and secure the peace.

But that was before the anti-war candidate Howard Dean had surged ahead in the polls. When that happened, and Kerry saw that he was going to lose the party nomination, he decided to switch sides. He turned his back on everything he had said in defense of the war, and the necessity of using force, and he turned his back on our troops in the field, and attacked their commander-in-chief. He did it for one reason, and one reason only. He did it because he saw it as the only way to win the Democratic nomination and have a chance of winning the presidency in 2004.

Kerry and the Democrats betrayed the war they had authorized; they betrayed the young Americans they sent into harms way; they betrayed the country they had sworn to serve. They did it to win the political power they were going to use to change the world. No conservative in his right mind would behave like this. No conservative would regard a political administration in Washington as a stepping stone on the way to a brave new world, and therefore something to justify opposing a war they had authorized and supported.

What were the issues the Democrats used to make their case against the president and the war in Iraq? It didn’t really matter, because the issues were never the issue. The Democrats opposed Bush and the war because both stood in the way of their quest for power.

The Democrats attacked Bush for acting in haste and acting unilaterally. Both charges were false. Worse, the Democrats claimed that the war was about weapons of mass destruction, ignoring the fact that Saddam had violated the Gulf War truce and had failed to comply with sixteen Security Council resolutions attempting to bring him into line, including the ultimatum of December 7. To make their case they claimed that Bush falsified the intelligence reports about weapons of mass destruction and lied in order to fool them into supporting the war. This was the biggest lie of the entire war. CIA chief George Tenet was a Clinton appointee. John Kerry sat on the intelligence committees with other Democrats like Feinstein and Rockefeller. The Democrats had access to all the intelligence information that Bush did. Bush could not have persuaded them to support the war by lying about the data, even if he had wanted to.

Why did they accuse him of lying? Because they could not admit the actual reason they had betrayed the war and the young men and women they sent to battle. They did it for partisan political gain. Unfortunately neither the White House nor any Republican had the political courage to hold them to account, and we are all paying the price for that.

For five years the Democrats conducted a scorched earth campaign against their country and its commander in the midst of a war. The harm they did is irreparable. Their sabotage of the war crippled our efforts to prosecute it – for example to follow Saddam’s weapons and generals into Syria, where they had fled; to take the war to Iran which supplied the IEDs which killed most of our troops; to close the border with Syria across which jihadists entered Iraq to fight our troops. The Democrats’ sabotage of the war created the power vacuum in the Middle East, which the terrorists and the Russians have now filled. And it most certainly inflicted casualties on our troops, though no one has had the political courage to say so.

The Democrats sabotaged the war in Iraq for the worst of reasons. They claimed it was for principle, but it was really – and only — to save their political skins.

Once the Democrats recaptured the presidency, it took no time at all for events to expose this destructive farce. Unlike the majority of his Democratic colleagues, Senator Barack Obama had always opposed the war in Iraq. He was against American interventions in sovereign countries, and he was against presidents who acted unilaterally, and in haste. Or so he said.

But when Obama became president and had the power to do so, he invaded Libya: unilaterally, and without authorization, and with no national security interest at stake. And he lied about the cause. There was no prospect of massacres as he claimed, and it was not a human rights intervention. If it were, Libya would not now be in chaos with al-Qaeda resurgent, and in a worse state than before.

Obama’s invasion of Libya was not merely unilateral. It was egomaniacal. Obama consulted no one outside his White House inner circle, not his own party, not the Congress, not the United Nations. Unlike Bush, he acted without constitutional authority and he acted alone. Yet there was not one Democratic leader who stood up for the principles they had all invoked to cripple America’s war against the jihadists in Iraq. Not one Democratic leader opposed the Democratic president, or criticized his aggression. They abandoned the principles of multilaterialism, consultation with Congress, and support from the U.N. because it would have been bad for their leader if they didn’t; it would have jeopardized their power.

The political consequences of the differences between conservatives and progressives is not only not small, it affects the way both sides conduct their political battles. Progressives focus on an impossible future, a utopia of promises, and this justifies for them their unscrupulous means. Issues for them are merely instruments for accumulating political power.  Conservatives look to the past as a guide to what is possible and humanly practical, and what is not. Issues for them are problems that need to be fixed, and they take seriously the policies they devise to address them. This puts conservatives at a huge political disadvantage. It causes them to argue policy as though they were debating a party with whom they shared goals and only differed on the means to get there. But that is far from the case.

Take the present debate about a government shutdown. A statement from Boehner’s office explains, “The entire government is shut down right now because Washington Democrats refuse to even talk about fairness for all Americans under ObamaCare.” This is a proposal for compromise and is designed to portray Republicans as reasonable. We’re all part of the same social contract, and we need to give on both sides to resolve the impasse. We’re all interested in fairness, when all is said and done. If individuals were to be given a year’s extension under Obamacare, as corporations already have been, that would be fair. But since when is Obamacare about fairness? That’s a Democratic façade and talking point, courtesy of the Republican Speaker. By way of contrast, this is how the Democrats make their argument: “Republicans are trying to shut down the government so they can prevent us from providing all Americans with affordable healthcare.” In other words, Democrats are standing up for fairness and ordinary Americans, against the selfish Republicans who want deny them affordable care and shut down their government. This is three lies in one sentence. But who do you think wins that vote?

If you want to fight the left you have to fight fire with fire. That means first and foremost you have to hold them to account for hurting the people they are pretending to help. Whose opportunities are going to be wrecked by Obamacare? Health care taxes will go up for those who pay taxes – the middle class — while their incomes will go down. Already Obamacare is cutting the workweek to 30 hours. Whose pocket books do you think that is hitting?

They claim conservatives are conducting a war against minorities; we need to throw the truth back in their faces. We need to tell the people that progressives are the principal oppressors and exploiters of minorities and the poor in this country. Progressives control the inner cities, which are teeming with the nation’s minorities and poor; and they run the broken public school systems that have become dumping grounds for those who cannot afford a private education.

The city of Milwaukee has been run by liberals and progressives without interruption for more than 100 years. What is the consequence of this progressive rule? Milwaukee’s median household income is forty percent below the rest of the country. The black unemployment rate is 27%, three times the national average for everyone. Milwaukee’s population is majority black and Hispanic, and 30% of it lives below the poverty line. A third of Milwaukee’s public school children drop out before they graduate; those who do are barely literate. That’s what progressive policies achieve. Don’t let them forget it.

Conservatives need to put the human disasters of progressive policies in front of people every chance they get. We need to confront progressives with the misery they have created in America’s bankrupt cities, Detroit and Chicago, Philadelphia and Cincinnati, St. Louis, and the nation’s capital, and every city they have controlled for 25, 50 and 100 years, without interruption.

Conservatives need to talk less to the voters’ heads and more to their hearts. Government debt is not just an accountant’s nightmare. Debt is a form of economic slavery. If you add up all the taxes Americans pay — federal, state, local, income, sales — Americans already work half the year for government rather than for themselves. Like Obamacare and the political use of the I.R.S., debt is a threat to individual freedom.

Freedom is what our cause is about not just fiscal responsibility. Fiscal responsibility has no emotional appeal except to people who already understand what it means. Fiscal responsibility is a means to an end. The end is freedom, and that is what inspires commitment and sacrifice and the passion necessary to win. Because it speaks to the heart.

Conservatives need to speak up as champions of the little guys, the underdogs, whose lives are being steadily constricted – made less free — by the ongoing destruction of a system that once afforded more opportunity for more people than any other in the history of the world. Conservatives need to speak up for the young whose future horizons are being rapidly diminished as the trillion dollar Obama deficits pile higher and higher. Conservatives need to speak for all Americans whose security under Obama has been degraded to the most dangerous levels since the end of the Cold War.

This is the threat we face, and the sooner we grapple with it the greater our chances to survive it. The most important battle in the world today is not being waged in the Middle East but here at home in the United States. If we lose this battle, everything is lost. But if we will take the measure of the enemies of freedom and prepare ourselves to fight them, we have a better than even chance to win.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

  • Harry Hopkins

    this all sounds well and good David but you supported Radosh in his attack on Dianne West. Harvey West most likely does not believe the Russians developed their bomb from their own resources now. Once he learned about the time it takes. When the Russians started and when their bomb blew up. That can only mean Harry Hopkins was the means by which they got their nuke and Major Racey Jordan documented this fact. So you might want to apologize to all of us and Diane and admit you were in error.

    • DogmaelJones1

      It ain’t gonna happen. He’s vested in his attack on West and his support of Radosh. An apology would imply the wrongness of the whole incident.

      • truebearing

        You continue to brilliantly evince a puny, narrow mind. One would think someone so concerned about communism would stop dwelling on the past and concern himself with addressing the current assault from communists in the Whitehouse, but apparently you think book reviews are more pressing. I guess your intellectual capacity restricts you to impotent and pointless yapping about things that have nothing to do with you personally.

        • DogmaelJones1

          Well, I’ll just go stand in a corner and weep and lick my
          wounds because you’ve found me out. I mean, you’re such an intellectual giant, look at all the ad hominem slurs you’re able to employ. Or perhaps, because you think I’m not concerned with communism, you’d like to sample one or two of my columns, beginning with “Just Like a Tyrant” here: http://ruleofreason.blogspot.com/2013/10/just-like-tyrant-obamas-executive.html , or one of my novels. I recommend the Sparrowhawk series, which would prove I have such a puny, narrow mind. And if I continue to dwell on the past, it is because one learns from the past and can observe precedents and the principles behind them. Or do you disagree with Santayana? Look, whoever you are: I’ve been watching this country slide into dictatorship for decades. If you can match a fraction of what I’ve written on
          that and other subjects, please let me and other readers know.

          • truebearing

            You completely ignored my criticism…understandably, since their is no intelligent defense for your continued whining, especially considering the essentiality of fighting in the present, not obsessing over the past. And worse than obsessing over the past is obsessing over a review of one person’s theories of the past.

            It is obvious that your “polemic” is heavily dependent on your past, which is a non sequitur response to my criticism and interests me little. Furthermore, your literary pedigree doesn’t justify continuing this internecine sniping, and you know it.

            Since you and I, and David Horowitz, are all in vehement opposition to communism, why are you behaving so divisively? Shouldn’t we be working together? Isn’t West intellectually capable of defending her work? Can’t you let it go, or is OCD your primary operating system?

            Your comment was yet another from the West disciples that intentionally hijacked a thread for no good reason. It was petty and irritating, hence my effrontery to your eminence.

          • DogmaelJones1

            This merry-go-round exchange is over. You keep calling names, making accusations, and I’m supposed to recognize the troll in the audience and let him lead the conversation. Did you bother to look at my publishing record? Apparently not. Go excoriate some other critic of Horowitz on this page. Goodbye. .

          • truebearing

            You keep avoiding answering my original point, but keep trying to win the debate on your “publishing record.” I hate to break it to you, but your publishing record is irrelevant in this, or any other comment section, unless the topic being discussed is your publishing record. Your comments are judged for what they are, not eternally justified by your past achievements, regardless of their merits. That is the beauty and honesty of the internet comment section. It is a masquerade ball, where no one knows who the other commenters are…unless they reveal themselves. It is the ultimate in democratic expression.

            It’s not that I doubt, or denigrate, your literary accomplishments, as I have no reason to, nor justification for doing, having never read any of your work. My point is simple, and I think clear: the West book review is simply not the most important, or 1000th most important thing conservatives should be concerned with in the present. To continue to hijack every post by Horowitz is disruptive and counter-productive.

            Your criticism of my biting tone is legitimate, but that swords cuts both ways. What about the ridiculous slurs and mean-spiritedness of West’s supporters against Horowitz, Radosh, or anyone who even remotely defended them?

            It is likely that we are in agreement on far more than we are in disagreement, so I am happy to cease firing in your direction. I have targets that are far more deserving.

          • cedarbend

            Why did Horowitz behave so divisively? Why, just like the moveon crowd, do you want to ignore something that wasn’t that admirable? I admire Horowitz immensely, and this column is pure gold, but that whole incident was uncalled for and there’s no reason people need to pretend it never happened.

          • truebearing

            Maybe you could build a pyramid to memorialize that book review for centuries to come. Or you could just accept the fact that people can disagree, sometimes heatedly, even when they are primarily in agreement.

      • wildjew

        Can you point out where Radosh was wrong about Diana West’s book other than the personal (petty?) tenor in his approach?

        • DogmaelJones1

          Go to Diana West’s website and read the whole thing, or to Breitbart, where her rebuttal was reprinted in full, as well. Further, perhaps you’d rather order the new book she’s had published that contains the rebuttal and much more.

          • wildjew

            Is my summary about right? Does Diana West believe (a Horowitz and others maintain) U.S. leaders deliberately gave much of Eastern Europe over to Russia after the war? More importantly, does West think the US was wrong to help the murderous Stalin dictator defeat Nazism?

        • Crazycatkid

          I wish I had the link handy. There was a brilliant answer to your question by an ex-Soviet dissenter that was long and powerful (published a couple of weeks ago at Breitbart). I saved it to send out to others. He showed that Rodesh (&Horowizt, et al) conceded the facts but not her conclusions. The issue is the why of all their vitriol? Is Horowitz not really divorced from his past leftism? Or are personal animosities more important than our freedom? These egotistical in-fights do not help the beleaguered American people.

          • wildjew

            I have not read her book. Looking at quotes from her book provided here by confirming them at Amazon – which affords readers the ability to read portions of a book – West ‘appears’ to conclude that the Allies (the United States in particular) gave military aid (Lend Lease, etc.) to Russia, as well as boots on the ground in Russia’s favor in order to defeat Hitler, Germany and Nazism. All this contributed to Russia’s occupation of much of Eastern Europe after the war which West believes was not accidental with respect to the Allies. Do I have it about right? The Russians also bled massively for the Allies before the United States opened up a second front (June 1944, Normandy) Stalin demanded from the Allies.

    • truebearing

      Only a petty dogmatist and fool of immense proportions would continue to snivel about a book review controversy when the nation is in the throes of an incremental Gramscian — communist — coup, and there are ten thousand exigencies that are infinitely more important.

      • Guy Fromage

        That little dust up was (and against all reason, still is) a prime vector for concern trolling.

        • truebearing

          Intellectual conservatives should study the Humpty-Dumpty nursery rhyme and beware of their tendency toward Humpty-Dumptyism. After our fall, who is going to put all of the pieces back together again? Certainly not a bunch of squabbling, self-righteous know-it-alls.

    • Hank Rearden

      The Russians stole many things about The Bomb. Stalin knew more about it than Truman. And what they stole probably speeded up their acquisition of it. But the Russians were competent scientifically. The most important thing that they got from us was that The Bomb couid be built! I.e., that the theory of a neutron chain reaction could be implemented successfully in a device. Given the we bombed Japan, it would have been hard to conceal that fact from them.

      It still took them four years to build one. I cannot recall now if their first bomb was a uranium one or a plutonium one. Either way, there was a lot of engineering to do – either to enrich uranium or to chemically separate plutonium and then design the implosion device, the nature of which they stole from us.

      So, we are talking a few years more or less here. It is not as if the Russians would NEVER have gotten The Bomb without stealing American technology. The whole point of the crash program at Los Alamos was that we were afraid that THE GERMANS would get the bomb because it was realized as possible by advanced physicists after James Chadwick discovered the neutron.

      Since we were not at war with the Russians and in fact never went to war with them, the damage that spying did was limited, WHOEVER may have been a spy.

      • Laddie_Blah_Blah

        “…the damage that spying did was limited, WHOEVER may have been a spy.”

        Not so. Klaus Fuchs, Ted Hall, and David Greenglass all worked at Los Alamos on the Manhattan Project, and all were agents of Joe Stalin’s GRU. He tracked the development of Fat Man and Little Boy more closely than FDR, and the info he obtained from the agents who helped conceive the A-bomb (Fuchs), design it (Hall), and build it (Greenglass) enabled Stalin to build the USSR’s first bomb several years before the Brits were able to explode their own.

        The source for all of that is Anatoly Mitrokhin’s “The Sword and the Shield,” not Diana West or anyone else. Mitrokhin was the long-time archivist of the KGB, and that info was taken by Mitr4okhin right from the USSR’s own archives.

    • NAHALKIDES

      Even if you were correct, it has nothing to do with this speech, which is about the New Left here in America and how to stop it, which is a little more important than the disagreement between West and Radosh.

  • Supertx

    Excellent piece that covers a lot in a brief summary. I wish the many uninformed would read it, but since you aren’t appearing on Jon Stewart, they won’t.
    I see your commenters are still on the Dianne West thing. Too bad it happened at all, as it is a needless distraction at a crucial time.

    • sendtheclunkerbacktochicago

      Give credit where credit is due. At least Diana West hiked up her dress and declared that Obama has committed the biggest fraud ever committed against this country and she used material form the two year criminal investigation to support her reason for saying that. When will Mr. Horowitz reach down and grab his crotch and do the same?

  • semus

    I hope the Republicans in office read this.

    • dixie68

      They won’t because too many of them think the same way democrats do. For the most part they only want power and nothing short of an armed revolution is going to change our situation. It is sad to see this once great country die.

      • NAHALKIDES

        There is an alternative: we Conservatives are the majority within the Republican Party, and if we took control of it as we are entitled to, we might still stop the Left without a revolution.

        • dixie68

          I agree with you that we are in the majority among Republicans, but, try as I might, it is very difficult to wake people up until something affects them personally. I keep telling everyone I know that the democrats want us to be asleep at the switch.

          • The March Hare

            The actions of the government during this shutdown will go a long way toward waking people up. Let’s hope it is enough people.

          • dixie68

            I was watching C-SPAN this morning and one dem congressman (female) spoke for one minute and in that time, she mentioned the “republican shutdown” at least six times. This is one of their great tactics The Republicans just won’t reply in kind, as they always believe they must refer to dems as “my friend across the aisle.” This gets very old.

          • The March Hare

            More Republicans are replying. The reference to “my friends across the aisle” is mostly heard from John McCain who is an establishment Republican. Ted Cruz, Rand Paul and others are starting to change that. The shutdown is so far over the top with stupid tactics that hopefully people will see how much of the DemonRATS crap is pure lies and begin to see them in a different light.

          • tracy

            Until it affects them PERSONALLY,case in point.

      • Surry918

        I’ll be honest Dixie, and it makes me sick to say this, but I completely agree with you. I’m just not sure anymore if this position we are now in, will ever be fixable via political means. Politicians seem to be overwhelmingly corrupt, and partisan to a party that wants power, instead of doing what is best for America and the American people. The constitution and bill of rights have all but been eviscerated, and both parties are currently saying or doing anything for ‘votes’

        • dixie68

          Thanks, you make me think maybe I’m not quite “off my rocker” yet. As bad as it is, and I think it will get worse, it is making me more determined to not give up. With eight grandchildren and six great grandchildren, I believe they must be fully informed of what has been, what is going on now, and what to expect, and I just don’t know anyone else who will do that if I don’t. I thank my Heavenly Father that we never lived beyond our means, and I continue to stress this to my younger family. At my advanced age, I know I will survive, but it would be far better for me to face a firing squad than to live in a land with no moral compass and no liberty.

        • Callista Bernard

          Did you even read this article ?
          We are a heartbeat 2014 away from having no America–as it once was. Most of the left, would say GOOD.
          Obama has the Supreme Court & the Senate– his enemy is the House– This is ALL he does is campaign against the HOUSE.
          With the House–nothing can stop him. They want to do away with the Constitution.
          “an old document made by rich white guys, they say.
          No voting no rights.
          Progressives are Communists.

          Go on Wikipedia and read ” inverted totalitarianism”
          It explains it, much like this guy, only a different way .

    • russhenry

      Send a copy to all of them! Don’t just hope!!

    • sendtheclunkerbacktochicago

      Send a copy of Lt. Mike Zullo’s evidence he gathered in his two year criminal investigation of Obama. That is the only way the nightmare will end.

  • truebearing

    Brilliant summary and analysis. This speech should be required reading for every conservative…and anyone else who cherishes liberty and justice.

    Perhaps the most important point Mr. Horowitz makes is that people on the Right have to stop projecting their own values and motives onto Leftists. Many Conservatives can’t imagine a president who genuinely wants to destroy the nation that elected him — an election that resoundingly refutes the Left’s unending accusations of America’s rampant racism.

    Too many conservatives still look for “rational” explanations of Obama’s behavior when his actions are blatantly contrary to the well being of America. They reason that only a fool would destroy our coal industry, or block the Canadian pipeline. They blame his actions on incompetence or stupidity. He is neither.They continue to match his actions with the the wrong motives because the enormity of his betrayal is too much to comprehend and denial obscures the truth that is right before their eyes. This inability to see the truth keeps the Right at a constant disadvantage.

    Obama is not stupid or incompetent, he is evil, and he is bent on destroying America and replacing it with totalitarianism, as are all of his fellow revolutionaries. It is really quite simple to understand people like Obama if one matches their actions with the kinds of motives that would inspire such actions.

    A good illustration of how conservatives differ from the Left is during the primary process. The Right agonizes over choosing the perfect candidate, while the Left works on the perfect lie.

    • Otis A Glazebrook IV

      truebearing – I think that you are correct.
      I think that the fundamental problem is in thinking that the Republican Party was founded by or always been constitutionally conservative (meaning that it is a contract among equal sovereign States). It was not which is why the Party continually undermines the commonsense conservatism. It is also improper ti label all Democrats as “Liberals”. There is nothing Liberal or Progressive about them and they gained their political stranglehold in the Election of 1860.
      Columbia Poly-Sci Professor William A. Dunning coined the appropriate label (which was touched on in this piece) for these people – Emotionalists. The heart always trumps the head and commonsense…
      I also agree that Obama will Default in the final consolidationists’ push to destroy what is left of Federalism.

      • sendtheclunkerbacktochicago

        The Republicans don’t need to read this, they need to ask Lt. Mike Zullo to brief them with all the criminal evidence he and his team of investigators have gathered during their two year criminal investigation. Zullo has briefed some Congresspersons and some Washington VIP over the last month but many more need to be brought on board. His evidence is the ONLY way America will rid themselves of this nightmare.

        • Michael__Durham

          I hope Mr. Zullo and all of his contacts have backups of all data and recordings and testimony and paperwork, and backups of backups, distributed among many and diverse, reliable, and anonymous contacts both inside, and outside the U.S.

        • Amber

          Let’s roll and put the fire to Lt. Mike Zullo’s feet. Fingers are ready for an email to him. Horowitz really explains in detail what is happening to us from the perspective that we need to hear.

    • Farnsworth

      “Obama is not stupid or incompetent, he is evil, and he is bent on destroying America and replacing it with totalitarianism”
      The focus of all evil is in the Democratic (progressive) movement, with Obama as it’s head.

      • sendtheclunkerbacktochicago

        Farnsworth, you hit the nail on the head and sooner of later Mr. Horowitz will come to realize that it is much worse than he has ever imagined. This is a psycho we are dealing with and he is operating America’s most dangerous sleeper cell. There are walls built around this man that need to be broken down quickly.

        • The March Hare

          “Mr. Horowitz will come to realize that it is much worse than he has ever imagined.”

          What is it that “he is bent on destroying America and replacing it with totalitarianism” did you not understand? Are you saying it is worse than that???

          • sendtheclunkerbacktochicago

            What is much worse is the fact that the Conservative media (which includes Frontpage) and Congress are silent about his fraudulent and criminal behavior. Their silence allows this biggest scandal in the history of our country to go unpunished for crying out loud. They are sweeping it under the “rug” hoping it goes away. Someday soon we will be thanking God for the amazing sacrifices of some honorable patriots who have been investigating this fraudulent and criminal activity for years. Please give me a reason why you think Mr. Horowitz is not reporting and giving speeches about the criminal activity. All he would have to do is spend a day with Lt. Mike Zullo and the investigators who did the work. How hard is that? I am sure Mr. Horowitz can spare the money to do it, hell those patriots have spent a barn full of their own money trying to find a platform to show their evidence. That isn’t asking too much, now is it?

          • jimbodc1

            That was the Clinton’s mode of operation, take em out and shoot em…

          • http://www.themadjewess.com/ The Mad Jewess

            He has already purged quite a few generals and an AF Major General today was purged

          • morris adams

            yeah, like the 2nd or 3rd nucular general! this has GOT to come to a head….. don’t it??

          • Lisa Marie Graciolett

            a bit scarey… he is working alot faster then we even thought he was

          • Mark

            Ah yes, you mean like the “accidental” Deaths of Bill Clinton’s closest “Friends”, Vince Foster and Ron Brown?

            Those were hits to protect Zipper billy from being caught for doing some of the truly evil thing he did during his presidency, like signing Executive Orders giving the President power to seize control of all parts of the United States Government when unspecified “Emergencies” occur.

            It seems to me we should also be focused on this, especially since the Federal Agencies are stockpiling weapons and ammunition, while simultaneously attempting to suppress our Right to Keep and Bear Arms, by confiscating guns owned by law abiding Americans, through gun control legislation.

            If this isn’t also evil, then what is?

        • Farnsworth

          Why thank you so much for the kind words. you are the first on Disqus to be civil to me.
          It’s to late for the wall to be brought down, he’s a lame duck and the truth doesn’t matter to Americans anyway. Facts don’t matter to Americans, nor does life itself when it comes to this man.
          Obama is evil and he is protected by very powerful evil people. He is clearing a path for old scratch and his minions.

          • June Clinkenbeard

            I’m sorry to hear you haven’t enjoyed civil discussions here on Disqus. I have had many, I’m happy to say. There are idiots everywhere to be sure, but I don’t waste a lot of time on them.

            I agreed with everything you wrote about Mr. Horowitz’s analysis except that “facts don’t matter to Americans”. That simply is not true among my friends and relations, but there are definitely Americans who fit that bill. I suppose one could make an argument against any type of generalization but that could become tedious. I hope you’ll forgive me but I couldn’t sleep so I dove in head first.

            As for Obama, he is most definitely evil, and in my neck of the woods we well know it. Racism & other complaints from the howling Left are just red herrings. I’m happy I am not relegated to discussions with dimwitted fools who couldn’t care less that Rome is burning.

          • Farnsworth

            My evidence that “facts don’t matter to Americans” is very easy to see.
            If facts mattered, why was Obama re-elected after Benghazi and the IRS scandles?
            I know parts of America do care about those facts, but the numbers are in the voting minority.
            While youo may hold out hope for a change, I do not. Americans have become a self centered, distracted, shallow and stupid people.

          • June Clinkenbeard

            I think Obama was re-elected for a variety of reasons. People have their own agenda and will behave in a manner that reflects that. Americans thought what has been happening was politics as usual. No harm, no foul, right? One administration is much like another and with old media locked down, Obama controlled the message. People are gullible. They discovered much too late that this is a whole new ballgame. I also think he was re-elected due to Conservatives staying home because they refused to vote for Mitt Romney which in hindsight was a horrible mistake.

            I agree with you that a lot of Americans are woefully ignorant on a variety of topics but they will be swept away first if they don’t wake up. I would love to say I am hopeful but my feelings for quite some time have been pretty much outrage mingled with fear. Action is a good panacea for that. That’s my plan. I stay informed and I vote but that is no longer enough.

          • Mark

            I think Obama was re-elected for a variety of reasons. People have their own agenda.

            I’m not sure I agree with that statement. Most people are more concerned with their day-to-day lives, instead of actually learning about the important issues being voted upon in any given election.

            Case in point: Several of my co-workers were more concerned with their belief that Mitt Romney would have ended all welfare payments, instead of being even remotely-concerned about either the attack on Benghazi, or the IRS Scandal.

            In fact, they were more concerned that Obama Scare (oops, I mean Obama Care) passed, so everyone would be covered by the insurance promised by the President.

            Americans thought what has been happening was politics as usual. No harm, no foul, right?

            Naturally, and they were right. The absolutely-disgusting mudslinging done by both parties during the campaign truly was “business as usual”, so after hearing for even a short time, most people simply tuned it out.

            After all, why trust any politicians when they’re “all” liars, right?

            “One administration, is much like another” especially true with both Obama administrations, and worse.

            “and with old media locked down, Obama controlled the message.” Exactly. And once the propaganda arm of the Democratic Party was in full Operation, then Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan didn’t have a chance.

            People are gullible. They discovered much too late that this is a whole new ballgame.

            Not exactly. If the people would spend as much time learning about the issues that are important to them, (and here, I mean the basics, since learning every detail might be impossible): as they do planning yearly vacations, or worrying about which cable package to subscribe to, then they’d be able to make informed choices when they vote.

            So, in that case, he might not have been elected the first time, nor reelected last November.

            I also think he was re-elected due to Conservatives staying home because they refused to vote for Mitt Romney which in hindsight was a horrible mistake.

            Correct. I still don’t completely believe that so many Republicans who would have voted for the Romney/Ryan Ticket stayed home at the last moment, simply because they realized that Obama would trounce their candidate.

            Personally, i thing that some media shenanigans caused the Republican vote to be under counted.

            I was watching the election results on the web, and it seemed like each time Romney/Ryan pulled ahead, the vote for Obama repeatedly caught up t, and passed them at Warp Speed. (or maybe I should say warped speed).

            I hoe those who reelected Barack are truly happy with what they’ve stuck us with for the next 4 Years.

            Of course, if our male Senators and Representatives would all find their testicular Fortitude, Impeach the President, and find him guilty of all charges, we’d be free of him relatively soon.

            While I believe the possibility of this is relatively high, I’ wouldn’t bank, (or bet) on it being probable.

            Also, I don’t believe that the people are woefully ignorant, but that most choose to be uninformed, so they can blame any problems on everyone else.

            Just once, I’d love to be proven wrong, during an election in which the majority of the people actually choose the issues that are most important to them, and vote according to their own beliefs.

            And like my previous comment, regarding Impeachment, while I believe that’s possible, I’m truly uncertain as to how probable it is.

            We can each be the Paul and Paulette Reveres Mark Levin exhorts us to be every night, provided each of us chooses to be, because we believe that our vote, and our daily actions truly count, if we wish to reclaim our American Republic.

          • Mark

            If facts mattered, why was Obama re-elected after Benghazi and the IRS scandals?

            For two four simple reason. First, The majority of those who voted for him took no time to acquaint themselves with the facts. They paid attention to the false political rhetoric, and didn’t allow the “facts” to “confuse” them.

            Next, For many, the Deaths of Ambassador Stevens and his marine guards were unimportant, since they weren’t acquainted the deceased.

            I know, since I kept reminding some of my coworkers who voted for O, that the president was responsible for protecting our diplomats, and he failed to do so, and they ignored my reasoning.

            Then, since the IRS Scandal didn’t effect them, it was probably irrelevant to them.

            And finally, the People didn’t re-elect him, the Media did. If I’m wrong, then how could they have declared him the winner, before all of the polling places had closed, and before most of the votes had been counted?

            Unless “m mistaken not even the electoral college Votes from a majority of the States had been counted when O Bomb Out was declared the winner.

            Something was rotten in the United States of America that night, and it wasn’t the so-called Republican-induced voter fraud.

            The election was fixed, and no one can convince me that it wasn’t.

          • Mark

            If facts mattered, why was Obama re-elected after Benghazi and the IRS scandals?

            For 4 simple reason. First, The majority of those who votedfor him took no time to acquaint themselves with the facts. They paid attention to the false political rhetoric, and didn’t allow the “facts” to “confuse” them.

            Next, For many, the Deaths of Ambassador Stevens and his marine guards were unimportant, since they weren’t acquainted the deceased.

            I know, since I kept reminding some of my coworkers who voted for O, that the president was responsible for protecting our diplomats, and he failed to do so, and they ignored my reasoning.

            Then, since the IRS Scandal didn’t effect them, it was probably irrelevant to them.

            And finally, the People didn’t re-elect him, the Media did. If I’m wrong, then how could they have declared him the winner, before all of the polling places had closed, and before most of the votes had been counted?

            Unless I’m mistaken not even the electoral college Votes from a majority of the States had been counted when O Bomb Out was declared the winner.

            Something was rotten in the United States of America that night, and it wasn’t the so-called Republican-induced voter fraud, or the sudden overwhelming non turnout of Republican Voters

            The election was fixed, and no one can convince me that it wasn’t.

          • Mark

            If facts mattered, why was Obama re-elected after Benghazi and the IRS scandals?

            For 4 simple reason. First, The majority of those who voted for him took no time to acquaint themselves with the facts. They paid attention to the false political rhetoric, and didn’t allow the “facts” to “confuse” them.

            Next, For many, the Deaths of Ambassador Stevens and his marine guards were unimportant, since they weren’t acquainted the deceased.

            I know, since I kept reminding some of my coworkers who voted for O, that the president was responsible for protecting our diplomats, and he failed to do so, and they ignored my reasoning.

            Then, since the IRS Scandal didn’t effect them, it was probably irrelevant to them.

            And finally, the People didn’t re-elect him, the Media did. If I’m wrong, then how could they have declared him the winner, before all of the polling places had closed, and before most of the votes had been counted?

            Unless I’m mistaken not even the electoral college Votes from a majority of the States had been counted when O Bomb Out was declared the winner.

            Something was rotten in the United States of America that night, and it wasn’t the so-called Republican-induced voter fraud, or the sudden overwhelming non turnout of Republican Voters

            The election was fixed, and no one can convince me that it wasn’t.

            “I know parts of America do care about those facts, but the numbers are in the voting minority.”

            Right, and the way to transform that minority into a majority, is for the People to learn the basic facts about the issues that are most important to them, and then vote for the candidate who’s views are closest to their own.

            And if more of the people truly wanted to do so, then they would, and voila, future elections would turn out in ways that actually convince the voters that their votes truly count.

            Hopefully, in the 2014 Primary, and the midterm election, more of the People will adopt this strategy. Otherwise, we’re in for more of the same, and worse for many years to come.

          • Mark

            I’d like to add one more fact, that actually surprised me and that most people probably aren’t aware of.

            When you Google “Classical Liberalism”, you may be surprised to discover that today’s Conservatives would’ve been known as Liberals in the past, since “Classical Liberalism” espoused the pursuit of Life, Liberty, and happiness, limited government, and the protection of Civil Liberties, just as present-day Conservatism does

            Where the Leftist, Communist, Evil Liberals of today went wrong, was that their predecessors totally embraced the pursuit of “Happiness”, and tossed life, liberty, and the other founding principles embodied in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution out the window.

            No doubt, this explains why some of today’s liberals are absolutely evil.

            I hope this surprises you as much as it surprised me, at least when I first read it.

          • dixie68

            Mr. Farnsworth, look at the upvotes you got. That shows overwhelming approval of what you said–and I totally agree with you.

          • Farnsworth

            I am pleasantly surprised and I THANK all those good folks that up voted me, it is appreciated!.

          • melloe

            Either that, or they are as misguided as he is <

          • Never Waste A Crisis

            The “lame duck” argument is possibly not true. What we should all worry about is “crisis” used to retain the power he has. All of these debt ceiling crisises will continue until in 2016 – bam! – it really does happen. Then he has his world crisis.

          • Farnsworth

            You are correct, with the recent revelations that Obama has forced out 7 generals in the military, he could be setting up some BS power grab. Martial law, manufactured crisis or whatever…..He’s evil, I will not put nothing past the man or his worshipers.

          • Mark

            Actually he’s the Crisis. Sadly the Benghazi Debacle, the IRS Scandal, the Government shutdown, and even the debt ceiling debate have all been caused by a President for whom the “Buck stops” somewhere out there.

            However, the real threat of him imposing Martial law is truly frightening.

            this is why all Presidential Executive Orders from the Clinton Era, empowering the President to seize control of all sectors of the Economy, especially National Defense and Transportation, if and when an unspecified “emergency” occurs Must IMMEDIATELY be rescinded by one or more Presidential Executive Orders.

            Unfortunately Herr Obama wouldn’t do that, as he’d be eliminating his Power as Supreme Commander (Forget Commander in Chief as prescribed by the Constitution); which would render him truly powerless.

            And the Emperor-designate of the United States of America, (at least that’s how I believe he sees himself) won’t do that.

            Would an unlikely Congressional Demand, signed by either two-thirds of three-quarters of Both Houses of Congress, demanding that these orders be unsealed, so the most dangerous ones could be repealed solve the problem?

            Probably so. And I’ve got a piece of Prime Land near the Brooklyn Bridge waiting for everyone who truly believes that our present Senators and Representatives would ever do something so incredibly and commonly sensible, since “common sense” doesn’t appear to be overly “common” to either the members of the House , or of the Senate on even an infrequent basis.

          • melloe

            I read this misinformation, lies and stupidity, and want to scream, A goodly number of those posting here have no idea what thee facts are. but the Generals thing is one of the stupidest. 1. The Marine Corps General , for various reasons requested that several high ranking Officers be fired ( they were retired and will draw their pensions with one exception as I understand it. ) 2. The Atomic bombs under the control of certain officers have been mishandled, and multiple inspections found glaring errors in the handling, including loading the wrong missiles ( with Atomic Warheads ) on the wrong plane, and letting them set unattended on the runway. The General in charge requested high ranking officers in charge be relieved of their duties. Generally, the Commander in Chief has to OK such cases. You people need to get some new news sources. Not that facts will make much difference on this site.

          • Farnsworth

            “You people need to get some new news sources”
            We all get the news we want to hear, mine are just as valid as yours princess
            “Not that facts will make much difference on this site.”
            Correct, see youor reply as an example.
            You cannot present any evidence that these generals were not dissmissed because they didn’t fit into Obama’s new military. A military that he would use against it’s citizens

          • melloe

            Except the spoiled egg in your argument is , the “crisis” were engineered by right and or the the House Tea Baggers. They said repeatedly they were going to shut down the government, and they did. The actual person front and center in the Shut down was Cruz, but he is only a pawn.

          • chris

            I accidentally voted down! I meant to give a thumbs up

          • Farnsworth

            all good, no problem

          • runsinquicksand

            Click on it, and it will go away.

          • Franco

            I respectfully disagree Farnsworth. The truth matters a hell of a lot to a great many of us.We are the Sleeping Giant and we are quickly waking from our long slumber.And unlike those on the left,,we are armed. well armed. We don’t need to go up against the armed forces, or the police. You see,,they are on our side, those who will reinstate our Constitution and Bill of Rights as amended. As the regressives show their hand more and more,,the truth will be plainly obvious,to those whose support matters a great deal. When things get really critical,,those in the armed services and law enforcement agencies at the state level,,will show THEIR hand and defect to the winning side.Ours. Then regressives will need to call on soldiers from the United Nations to do their dirty work,we know that they never have the balls to fight themselves. Then we will deal with the UN invaders as the enemies they truly are. We will roll them up in short order. We have the homefield advantage. I’ve been in the fight over 30 years and have never seen people so awake,active in the political process,,and pissed off. In my experience,the only thing that gets people involved is fear,, and anger. Well,, most people are past the fear phase. And because of the web and social media it’s much easier to get the word out, and pass around things like this devastating speech. Conservatives, Libertarians and those of a like mind are joining forces, not squabbling over crap that doesn’t matter. People are reading things that matter,like ”Rules for Radicals”, the left’s play book, and ”The Law” by Frederic Bastiat. We’re through backing down from these pussies, we’ll give no more ground.We’re not givin’ up, givin’ in and we’re never ever going to be silenced. The left is use to dealing with opponents like that loser John McCain, so docile and easy to manipulate. Well get ready,,there’s a new breed comin. And we’re not afraid to take one piece of advice from the left. The ends justify the means. Ain’t that right, lefties?LOlolol,,sauce for the goose, bitches,,sauce for the goose. And we’re not stoppin’ until it’s well done. Oh,,it won’t be fit to eat,, that’s not the reason for the party. The guest of ”honor”, those on the left,, will finally be put where they belong. In the trash. And there’s not a damn thing they will ever be able to do to stop it. They won’t even fight for their families if an intruder was in their home. They all say the same thing. They’ll,”Hid in the closet and call 911.” Well, you do just that,,cowards every one of them. Their stand against gun ownership is only to hide that very fact. They spend other people’s money and call it ”charity”,, call the cops when their wives are being raped,,and call it ”courage.” Their pu–ies,, and we all know it. The schoolyard bullies tough to. Until you beat him senseless one good time. All our attempts at logic and reason have failed. They want to FORCE us to live the way THEY want us to live. Well,is it force they understand? OK,, they have set the criteria.It’s the last thing any of us wanted. Mr. Horowitz said it himself,,decent people simply cannot believe that anyone can be so corrupt and deceitful. Well they are. So now we’ll never give them the benefit of the doubt again. That was their choice as well. It’s time for adults to spank their asses,, not change their diaper like they always need. Helpless to do anything themselves,,so let the gov care for them. No deal,, not anymore. Their willing to bitch loudly for the nation they say they want. Soon,,we’ll find out how many are willing to kill us for it. Because that’s what they are going to have to do to get it done. And believe me,, it’s never going to go that far. Not even close.

        • BenjaminGhazi

          Sendtheclunker… I believe your ‘sleeper cell’ description is perfect, and your next best observation is – quickly.

      • vulgar_imposter

        Funny, paranoid stuff.

        • MLCBLOG

          Like a bad dream for you?

        • http://www.themadjewess.com/ The Mad Jewess

          Funny? Have you looked at the purge of our generals under BH Osama?

          • defcon 4

            That’s somewhat scary. Perhaps he’s trying to replace generals w/ones more amenable to a dictatorship under the zero.

          • TheOleTeaBag

            He’s replacing the honorable generals who will uphold their oaths to preserve and protect the Constitution with compliant HACKS who are loyal only to HIM.

          • Farnsworth

            Like I said, NOTHING concerns the voting majority. Their small brains can’t process facts

          • Gordon Gordinsky

            He’s the President. Suck it up.

          • Wm James

            Gordon, you are a commie a hole. GTFO of my country,

          • Dawgonitt

            You Suck Gordy, you Commie Troll Shill. you are part of the problem. You should be Flushed.

          • June Clinkenbeard

            The pity is he will be. He just doesn’t know it yet.

          • chris

            Hitler is the fuhrer. Suck it up Jews. That’s ur idiotic argument gordon

          • Jim

            So Gordon, you support what the President is doing? I bet if the tables were turned you would cry out. Gordon, you need to look past yourself to understand what this is all about. It’s not about party it’s about our Country as a whole.

          • BHOHG2G

            Stop trying to reason with people like this. They say these things because they are one of THEM.
            They’re COMMUNISTS but may not even realize it.
            They are Jim Jones followers that missed the plane….and the kool-ade finale.

          • Mark

            Actually, it’s about the choice between Restoring the American Republic, as Mark Levin writes in “The Liberty Amendments, restoring the American Republic,” or letting the United States become the People’s Republic of America.

            I vote for restoring the American Republic.

            To Hell with the twisted dreams and visions of His Hind@ass Barack Hussein Obama.

            We need to take actions to make certain that this Government of the People, By the People and for the People NEVER PERISHES from the Earth.

          • runsinquicksand

            Mindless fool.

          • runsinquicksand

            Auto-Erotic Asphyxiation kills brain cells

          • Tyrantremover

            @ Gordon Gordinsky. Whose president is Hussein? That muslim commie does NOT represent me neither you.

        • Farnsworth

          Sad, pathetic reply.

          Pull your head out of Obama’s stretched bunghole, your brain needs oxygen.

          • dixie68

            I had not seen that ugly reply to you when I wrote the above comment. The trolls will come out.

          • Farnsworth

            It doesn’t bother me, nothing the progressive simpletons can say gets under my skin. I meet insult with insult, disrespect with disrespect. You can’t deal with the uncivilized with civilized rules and niceties.

        • June Clinkenbeard

          Yeah, I’m not laughing. You need to reevaluate. Clearly, your perspective is skewed. That slippery slope you guys love to ride on is about to hit rock bottom…

        • Gordon Gordinsky

          Very, very paranoid. You’d think that Horowitz is an Israeli living in an illegal settlement.

          • undermybus

            Ah the standard transmission libtard debating vehicle – zero to Jooooo in six seconds flat.

        • JohnG911

          Funny, because the left would be absolutely powerless without paranoia. The left accuses everyone who opposes Obama’s agenda of being racist knowing the paranoid beliefs of his supporters would shield Obama against criticism. Yet more wealth has been lost by more American blacks under the Obama regime than any other white president. The man made Global Warming movement would be powerless if not for people’s paranoia. The left couldn’t dominate the poor if not for their paranoid beliefs about most wealthy people. It was paranoia that gave Democrats so much power in the 2008 elections. Progressives would still be living in the shadows if not for the public’s paranoia fostered over years by the left.

          • BHOHG2G

            Excellent post. All true.

        • EllenBernal

          Funny? You must have been brainwashed since birth and have become a religious Obama Worshipper bowing before him. However people like you are easy Canon Fodder, they will march you to death.

      • fizarak

        I beg you not to forget that he himself was put into this position. He is a public figurehead, but not the figureheads.

        Even Jarrett is simply a public messenger from someone else to him.

        That is not to lessen the charges against them however. Just a reminder.

      • Paul Wade

        With Obama as it’s head and Congress by his side. Why did the Senate question John McCain on his constitutional eligibility but did not question Obama?

        Why did Obama refuse to show his birth certificate until 2011? There’s too many why’s on this subject but the main one is why did Congress allow this to happen?

    • sendtheclunkerbacktochicago

      Yes it was brilliant but I see that Mr. Horowitz could not bring himself to mention that the man bunkered down in the “sleeper cell” at 1600 Penn Ave is a fraud. He failed to mention that this Fraud in Chief has been under a two year criminal investigation looking into his fraudulent and E-Verified flagged SS# (042-68-4425), his fraudulent registration with the Selective Service in 2008 and his computer generated 9 layered April 27th, 2011 forged birth certificate. Wouldn’t you say that the root of our “threat” is the fact that this man is a FRAUD who sits next to the Nuclear Football for crying out loud. That should have been part of Mr. Horowitz’s opening remarks and yet he doesn’t even mention it. I love Mr. Horowitz for his investigative skills and vast knowledge about the radicals in America but this fraud and criminal activity is our biggest national security challenge (getting rid of this psycho in the WH).

      • The March Hare

        While all that is correct, it is does not pertain to the subject at hand which is regarding Obama’s beliefs, policies and actions and the tactics that should be used against him. You just can’t include everything in every article ever written.

      • MLCBLOG

        Let’s stick to the winning points. We are trying to influence the most people. While I agree that O is a total fraud (they celebrate his birth in Kenya!!) I think staying away from issues that make us look crazy is a good idea.

        • http://www.themadjewess.com/ The Mad Jewess

          ‘I think staying away from issues that make us look crazy is a good idea.;

          You dont get it–if you are not one of them–you ARE ‘crazy’

    • Laddie_Blah_Blah

      “Obama is not stupid or incompetent, he is evil, and he is bent on destroying America and replacing it with totalitarianism, as are all of his fellow revolutionaries.”

      Yes, and he knows exactly what he is doing:

      “Socialized medicine is the keystone to the arch of the socialist state.”

      – Vladimir Lenin

      Lenin’s insight was not lost on Adolph Hitler, who made socialized medicine a key component of the National Socialist totalitarian state.

      David is right, about everything. All I would add is that Obama, like Hitler, has coopted big money corporatists and enlisted their support for the progressive takeover. The insurance company lobbyists wrote the legislation, and it is they who are the chief beneficiaries of Obamacare. The suckers who voted for the crypto-fascist in the WH did not know how much the new Obamacare premiums would be, nor how high the annual deductibles would be, nor how draconian the co-pays would be, under Obamacare.

      Insurance under Obamacare does not equal coverage of medical expenses until, in some plans, the “insured” has paid out up to $6,000, annually, of his/her own money, first, for the annual deductible, and then up to 40% of the cost of medical services, thereafter, as the co-pay requirement. And then there is the requirement in Obamacare to burden premium costs with services that will never have to be rendered – e.g. the requirement for women aged 55 – 60 to pay for maternity coverage.

      Insurance? It’s more like a license to steal – a wealth redistribution scheme to take from the working and middle classes and give to the corporatist allies of the crypto-fascist.

      Check out the stock market performance of the major health insurers over the past year. Wall St. knows who benefits from Obamacare, and it doesn’t care about who will be fleeced. It’s Wall St. over Main St., corporatist style, in every respect. Nothing new, either. It’s all been done before, only not as stealthily nor as destructively as this iteration of “progressive” tyranny.

      • The March Hare

        Yes. And Lenin also studied “The Crowd: A Study of the Popular Mind by Gustave Le Bon who wrote of the psychology of the mobs during the French revolution. Just like Obama studied, taught and even put into practice Soul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals.

      • AussieBrit

        Err… Hitler was a fascist, not a Socialist.
        All government is corporatised. Theer is no left or right anymore. There is just government for teh interests of the corporations.

        • Laddie_Blah_Blah

          Err…fascism is a variant of socialism, the principle difference being that the fascist version seeks to control the means of production, while leaving the ownership and operation to those best able to produce, whereas the communists own and operate the means of production, themselves.

          The National Socialist German Worker’s Party knew that they were socialists, even if you don’t.

          • Gordon Gordinsky

            You are almost equating fascism and communism, while declaring a difference (in ownership, only). Do imply that the President is a fascist, or a communist?

          • Laddie_Blah_Blah

            Of course there is a difference, just as there are differences between different factions of any political movement, e.g. the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks of Soviet Russia. They hated each other, and made continuous war against each other for decades, which did not cease until Stalin finally succeeded in having Trotsky assassinated. The socialist Left has many variants, and within those variants are bitterly divided factions, but they are all socialists, and the Mensheviks and Bolsheviks were both communist, despite their differences.

            And both fascism and communism are nothing remotely like Marx’s utopian socialist worker’s paradise. Instead, both exploit labor to further the policies, dictates, and whims of the state. Workers serve the state as their primary function in a socialist system, no matter the flavor. The same is true of land and capital. Fascist and communist states have much more in common than not.

            Obama is a fascist. He, like both Mussolini and Hitler, chooses to partner with, and to coopt, corporatist assets in service to the policies, dictates, and whims of the state. Not unlike many European governments, he does so without the police state apparatus (although there are the beginnings of that seen in the use of the NSA and IRS) and the imperial ambitions of the socialists of the WWII era in Europe.

            Obama is most definitely not a free market capitalist.

          • 123z

            If you want to see the socialist economy model at work in the current world, I suggest you study Norway. It is most definitely NOT free market capitalism, yet Norway is very wealthy and prosperous. “Greed is Good” most definitely not a national motto in Norway as in is in the United States.

          • Laddie_Blah_Blah

            Both very true and utterly irrelevant. Norway’s wealth has nothing to do with socialism and everything to do with North Sea oil:

            http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-04/norway-s-740-billion-oil-fund-may-be-restructured-solberg-says.html

            If you are going to use oil wealth as a recommendation for a model of political and economic viability, why did you leave out Saudi Arabia? And Russia? And Kuwait? And so many others, like Venezuela?

          • 123z

            The answer to many of your questions is the very sovereign wealth fund that the Bloomberg article discusses. What explains their wealth is not oil wealth, but the manner in which they handle that wealth The reason why Norway has such a large sovereign wealth fund is that their oil wealth is considered national property. It is not considered to be the property of private companies and private investors. It belongs to the people of Norway, and because of this philosophy they have been able to accumulate so much wealth. Saudi Arabia has not done this and their national wealth belongs to the royal family. I believe the same can be said for Kuwait. Russia used to have a socialist government, but since it has become capitalist, all of their wealth belongs to the oligarchs, very much the same as it is here. Venezuela has not been successful, partly because we have done everything in our power to see that it is not successful.

            In Norway, the Government is the major stock holder in their big companies so hey do not have obscene private wealth over there such as we see in the Koch brothers.

          • Laddie_Blah_Blah

            “What explains their wealth is not oil wealth, but the manner in which they handle that wealth…”

            Well, gee, they wouldn’t have any wealth to “handle” if it weren’t for North Sea oil. Your argument isn’t an argument, it is nonsense.

            The Saudis, by the way, take great pains to distribute their oil wealth to their citizens via direct handouts. The Norwegian government just squirrels it away, where it remains out of the reach of the ordinary Norwegian. If you really believe in the redistribution of wealth, the Saudi monarchy is a truer practitioner than the Norwegian socialists.

            In neither case, however, does oil wealth validate their respective form of government. It just means they are wealthy because they have lots of oil, and oil is going for $100+ per barrel.

          • 123z

            For your information the 10 most prosperous countries in the world according to a list published in the Telegraph are 1.Norway, 2. Denmark, 3.Finland, 4. Aust. Desopralia, 5. New Zealand, 6. Sweden, 7. Canada, 8, Switzerland, 9. Netherlands, 10. United States. If oil wealth explains prosperity how come so many countries with no oil wealth are doing much better than we are? If you judge socialism by whether a country has a national health policy, then all/all of these countries are socialist. I think it is you, not me, who is full of nonsense and ignorance. The icing on the cake is that all/all of these countries except the U.S. have gun control laws. But just wait. Just like Prohibition was repealed when people realized the crime, violence and anarchy that it caused, so it is inevitable that the second amendment will also be repealed eventually.

          • Laddie_Blah_Blah

            My goodness, don’t you and the Telegraph know that the USA has the highest disposable family income ($38,000 per year) of any country in the world? No one else comes close, the nearest being Switzerland at $30,000 per year.

            http://www.businessinsider.com/top-countries-on-oecd-better-life-index-2013-5#10-united-kingdom-6

            Those figures come from the OECD, and disposable family income is a legitimate way to calculate wealth. How on Earth do you measure wealth for the average family if not by the average family’s disposable income – or do you think that is irrelevant? At least get your facts straight before you go popping off on stuff you apparently know nothing about.

          • 123z

            My facts are perfectly straight. The Gross National Income Per Capita in Norway is $55190, but it is only $46760 in the US. Unemployment in Norway is 1.7% but it is 9.6% in the USA. You got it wrong when you say that Switzerland comes second to the USA with disposable income of $30,000. Wrong! Norway comes second with $31,459. The reason why Norway has less disposable income is because of the high taxes they pay which ensure their high standard of living. They pay for the high medical standards and the wonderful education. This is why Norway is FAR ahead of the USA when it comes to quality of life. If we were willing to pay taxes for the national good and did not worship Greed as a way of life, then we might have a prosperous, worthwhile country too instead of a lunatic cowboy shoot-em-up wild, wild west. You are the one who has gone poppping off without knowing what he is talking about.

          • Laddie_Blah_Blah

            You call that straight! That gross national income figure obviously includes North Sea oil money, which skews the numbers the way you calculated them. Straight? Fundamentally dishonest is more like it.

            And oh, yeah, all that money must be too much for the Norwegians to bear, since they commit suicide at a rate higher than the USA. Sweden, too. Those people are so happy they just can’t stand it, apparently.

          • 123z

            MORE SOUR GRAPES!!….In case you forgot the story, let me tell it to you again. When the fox could not get some wonderful grapes which were too high up on the vine for him to reach, he said he really didn’t want them anyway because they were really no good – just sour grapes that no one would want.

            You are really pitiful!

          • Laddie_Blah_Blah

            “The Gross National Income Per Capita in Norway is $55190, but it is only $46760 in the US.”

            You call that straight? The GNI number includes all that wealth from the North Sea oil allocated over a small population. Straight? Fundamentally dishonest, is much more like it.

            “Unemployment in Norway is 1.7% but it is 9.6% in the USA.”

            People have dropped out of the work force in the USA, so the unemployment rate is actually much higher than that. If unemployment was counted the same way as it was during the Great Depression, it would be more like 17%, thanks to the gross misallocation of capital from the productive private sector to the unproductive, wasteful public sector that has been socially engineered by radical progressive dodos who know nothing of economics, not even Keynesian economics.

            The more capital the crypto-fascists take out of the private sector, the higher the unemployment rate will go. FDR did it during the Great Depression, too. It didn’t work then, and, obviously, it sure isn’t working now. There are slow learners, and then there are radical progressives, who never learn.

            BTW, there wasn’t any unemployment in the Soviet Union, either. Or in Cuba, now, for that matter. All those socialist workers, and nothing ever seems to get done, and hardly anything gets produced, and what is produced, no one wants.

            “The reason why Norway has less disposable income is because of the high taxes they pay which ensure their high standard of living.”

            That is too funny, even for you! If giving their money to the government makes their standard of living so high, why not give all of their money to the government, and make it even higher? Those happy Norwegian socialists, by the way, commit suicide at a higher rate than we Americans do. I wonder how they do it, since guns are relatively scarce over there. Maybe they choke themselves to death on all that excess happiness. Or maybe they over-dosed on their high standard of living. ;o)

            Our standard of living is much higher than anyone living in any country in Europe, because we have more money, of our own, to spend on more goods and services, that we choose for ourselves, at lower prices. Gasoline, alone, is so much more expensive over there, that most of them have to drive around in those funny little doodle buggies that we Americans wouldn’t be caught dead in.

            And no one, absolutely no one, goes to Norway for top-flight health care. If someone has enough money, they come here for the best health care treatment in the world, at least for now.

            And the food in Norway. Ugh! No wonder no one is sneaking into Norway the way millions have snuck into the USA. Who would want to live on a diet of inedibles, if they didn’t have to?

            And Euros who come over here are amazed at the housing stock here in the USA. The vast majority of them can’t comprehend living in the kind of spacious US home in American suburbia that we take for granted.

            “This is why Norway is FAR ahead of the USA when it comes to quality of life.”

            Uh-huh. Is that why no one emigrates to Norway, while illegals come here from all over the world, including Europe and Asia and Latin America – especially from socialist countries?

            I guess all those illegal socialists must be greedy, too, right? Or maybe they want a chance at a better life and real liberty that this country still offers, while socialist dead ends offer them nothing.

            “If we were willing to pay taxes for the national good and did not worship Greed as a way of life, then we might have a prosperous, worthwhile country too instead of a lunatic cowboy shoot-em-up wild, wild west.”

            Uh, did you accuse me of “popping off?” Really. If you want the government to have your money, just give it to them, instead of just “popping off” about the rest of us who want to keep what we earn. Put your own money where your own mouth is, and keep your hands out of my bank account. If you know as much about economics as you know about politics, you would misallocate almost as much capital as the federal government does, which is almost impossible, except, perhaps, for another socialist who is even more ignorant than our incompetent federal bureaucrats. But even you probably would not be able to do worse than spend half a billion on a web site for 3 1/2 years, force people to use it, and then fail to put it into operation. Kafka would have had a field day with that one.

            You want greed? Take a look at all the money the federal government is spending, now, and where most of it is going. Hint – it ain’t going to the poor.

            Sucker.

          • 123z

            SOUR GRAPES!!!

          • 123z

            You keep popping off when you have no idea what you are talking about. According to the GFP Oil by Country Report http://www.globalfirepower.com/oil-production-by-country.asp, the USA is the #3 oil producer in the world but Norway is only #14. Therefore, we have greater oil-wealth than Norway. What happens to our oil wealth? You say that Norway’s oil wealth adds to the wealth of their population. But somehow ours does not enhance the wealth of the American people. This is because it is ripped off by greedy capitalists and the people don’t see any of it. Is that correct, Mr. Blah-blah?

          • Laddie_Blah_Blah

            Norway’s wealth has nothing to do with socialism and everything to do with North Sea oil:

            http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-04/norway-s-740-billion-oil-fund-may-be-restructured-solberg-says.html

            Surely you knew that, didn’t you? Where would Norway be without North Sea oil?

            If you are going to use oil wealth as a benchmark to recommend political and economic models, why not Saudi Arabia, and monarchy, instead? Or Russia and its thugocracy as your preferred model? Both produce far more oil wealth than Norway, after all.

            And so do we, in spite of the current administration’s anti-fossil fuel policies. Virtually all of our oil wealth comes from free market initiatives.

        • http://www.themadjewess.com/ The Mad Jewess

          National SOCIALIST workers party=NAZI

          • Gordon Gordinsky

            They are in the past. Time to move on.

        • MLCBLOG

          You are entitled to your view of things.

          • B Jenkum

            How white of you….

        • JohnG911

          Err … me thinks your knowledge of history is lacking. What do you ‘think’ the acronym NAZI means? Mussolini was a fascist and I bet you think he was a right-winger too. Mr. Horowitz is correct, the left lies to hide the truth and they dominate our education system. You falsely believe people on the right own fascism and Hitler because some progressive educators drummed this lie in to your pointy little head. I suggest you read “Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left” by Jonah Goldberg.

          • AussieBrit

            As wikipedia puts Facism….
            Fascists sought to unify their nation through a totalitarian state that promoted the mass mobilization of the national community, and were characterized by having a vanguard party that initiated a revolutionary political movement aiming to reorganize the nation along principles according to fascist ideology. Hostile to liberal democracy, socialism, and communism, fascist movements shared certain common features, including the veneration of the state, a devotion to a strong leader, and an emphasis on ultranationalism and militarism. Fascism views political violence, war, and imperialism as a means to achieve national rejuvenation and asserts that stronger nations have the right to expand their territory by displacing weaker nations.
            Fascist ideology consistently invokes the primacy of the state. Leaders such as Benito Mussolini in Italy and Adolf Hitler in Germany embodied the state and claimed indisputable power. Fascism borrowed theories and terminology from socialism but applied them to what it saw as the more significant conflict between nations and races rather than to class conflict, and focused on ending the divisions between classes within the nation. It advocates a mixed economy, with the principal goal of achieving autarky to secure national self-sufficiency and independence through protectionist and interventionist economic policies. Fascism supports what is sometimes called a Third Position between capitalism and Marxist socialism.
            Sadly you decided to think that I was saying right-wing – I wasn’t. Fascism is a mixture of the two. But he was very anti-communism and hated the bolsheviks. But the concentration of power to the state is the hallmark of any totalitarian state, and aligns in that respect to socialism.
            East Germany was the DDR – Deutsche Demokratische Republik. It wasn’t democratic! NAZI wasn’t socialist – it’s just a name.
            True rightists are decent people that have a world view that tends to be conservative in nature. A hallmark of conservativism is that they don;t like change (it’s inherent in being conservative). If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Moderate, modern, Left-wing people believe that it IS broke and needs fixing. The further from moderation you get on either side, the less logical people get.
            Gay-marriage for instance. Rightists think that marriage is just between a man and woman, as it’s been that way for centuries, and it’s in the Bible (is it? would like to see the actual quote – one that can’t be undermined by something else in the Bible – sadly it’s a highly contrary book). Left-wingers would see that evidnece suggests that gay couples are just as ture, loyal and loving as a hetrosexual couple, and that their sexual preference is scientifically proven to be biological, not a choice. And that there is no eveidence to show that a gay couple will therefore produce gay children (whether via adoption or other means). So therefore they have every right to marry. In any case, it doesn’t stop any hetrosexual couple getting married, or affect the population in any way.

      • chris

        Only problem laddie is no one is going to purchase ‘obamacare’. The ins companies will not see the profits promised by obama. I can see the fall of the republic when obama ultimately does a commercial on TV wagging his finger in our face saying-i thought I told all u young/healthy ppl (who r also sick/poor according to obama) to buy ins. Now do it now or u will be punished

        • Laddie_Blah_Blah

          I hope, and believe, that you are right about Obamacare.

    • tracy

      We are supposed to be moving into the green direction.The only people chasing coal and other fossil fuels are the ones in the industry making money off of it.They don’t care who they pollute, it’s NOT THEIR backyard with leaking oil pipeline running through it. It’s NOT their drinking water that’s contaminated right? What do you plutocrats care? so long as there is NO interruption in that money flow,keep that pulse pounding and bank accounts swelling at all costs. You and the Koch brothers,your way or the highway right. You and your nefarious schemes to make more money.The more you get,the more you want,and the LESS you want to give to anyone else.

      • Well Done

        The only thing about climate science has PROVEN is that man’s CO2 is not a significant factor. The people “chasing coal and other fossil fuels” are pretty much everyone. The people telling us this isn’t sustainable do not have science behind them, they are merely another front for the same heinous wannabes behind 0bama.

        • MLCBLOG

          Well, there certainly is plenty of HOT CO2 as in hot air being blown around by the so-called scientist proponents of global warming.

          I remember we were all supposed to be terrified in the 1970’s because of global cooling!! not to mention each decade’s scare, including A bombs where children had to get under there desks and everyone had to build bomb shelters if they had any politically correct intelligence. This was in the 1950’s and 1960’s just as Paul E was getting going.

          Oh, and then there was Malthus before all that. The Debbie Doom of the previous century. There were too many people and we were all doing to die of malnutrition.

      • truebearing

        Try supporting your jeremiads with at least one scintilla of fact next time. Your incoherent maunderings are a compilation of propaganda snippets, bouncing around in your vacant mind. If you want to have a serious debate, start with being truthful, not regurgitating the nonsense you’ve been spoon fed by the Left’s professional liars.

        • tracy

          Left,right,and in between pundit talk pure CRAP.

          • truebearing

            Not that I am remotey surprised, but you didn’t address a single point of my criticism with anything resembling a fact. Your response was singularly incoherent and incoherent. At least you are consistent.

        • Icebow

          Hear! Hear!

    • Amber

      And somehow the left manages to vote in the right’s primaries, thus promoting the candidate that THEY want and tainting our political process.

    • The March Hare

      I believe it is mostly the establishment right that thinks that way about Obama. There are those coming up in the Republican party that see things for what they are such as Ted Cruz, Rand Paul and the like and they are catching flak from the establishment Republicans like McCain.

      • tracy

        Ted Cruz is a joke,Let’s see if he is running for office anytime soon.If he is it is no wonder he is the GOP hot air bag(they save the young ones for that) .

        • The March Hare

          The “joke” is going to be on you.

        • dixie68

          You would be very well of if you had one percent intelligence that Ted Cruz has.

          • tracy

            You would be very well of if,you could write a coherent sentence.

          • truebearing

            Your sentence was coherent? Illiterate is more like it.

          • tracy

            I wasn’t going to waste time with a reply to……..

          • steves_59

            “Quoth the semi-literate Tracy”
            Troll alert.

        • http://www.themadjewess.com/ The Mad Jewess

          Ted Cruz is a patriot. You’re a loser.

          • tracy

            So you are a Jewish plutocrat too?

          • http://www.themadjewess.com/ The Mad Jewess

            Are you a scumbag?
            Yeah.

          • jack levin

            Are You a Sick Brainless Cow? No Question about that Mad COW.

          • Jeffersons warriors

            You do realize that these terms such as Plutocrat, Corporatists, etc., are meaningless words used by the intellectual left to describe non existent bogeymen. I fear for the hollow intellect of the all knowing left.

        • Jay Rinard

          STFU

      • Judy

        No wonder you are the March Hare……………you both are CRAZY!!

        • The March Hare

          Why, thank you. Care for some tea?

    • vulgar_imposter

      Another sheep lines up to, “BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!”

      • nomoretraitors

        Time to crawl back inside your occupy tent. This is the big leagues

      • truebearing

        I’m really not interested in hearing about your “love” life.

      • Keep Honkin I’m Reloading

        ^^useful idiot alert

    • morris adams

      Brilliant summary and analysis… bra-VO! i believe your comment is brilliant. that don’t sound gay does it?? i’m gonna copy and paste your comment everywhere, as my own! thanks for not being a dumass! i’ll argue, however, that he IS stupid. to be a leftist, you’d have to be!

    • Gordon Gordinsky

      You should apply for work at FrontPageMag. Good luck with your “conservative” ambitions.

    • Linda Bartram

      maybe god will take are of the devil

    • Imam Khalid of Basra

      Us Muslims are peaceful freedom fighters. We work to free the infidel from sin with the help of Brother Obama.

      You kuffr only oppose him because he is African and Muslim.

      • Linda Bartram

        I hope your telling the truthut don’t play thr raciest card.thats all you guys do,will he hates whites,

    • Linda Bartram

      read the bible,obama is going to put us in the 3rd war it will last 3 years even he will die.every man and woman and child will be fighting ,Obama is the devil,but Jesus will come you need to read the book of a boy wrote years ago who died and went to heaven.he saw the 3rd world war.his dad is a preacher and asked his son if he would be fighting this war,i would say at the time hes in his 30’s his son told him yes he saw him fighting with a sword,and that was about 7 years ago,so folks get ready for the big one,
      I think the book is I died and went to heaven this little boy was only 3 or 4 at the time.so if we don’t get obama out of office he will soon have control and
      have all of his muslins in place for this war.they have been buying land up in las vegas for years.at least I can say im proud because I saw him or what he was and tried to tell others and never voted for him.but a lot of people did for the wrong reason to show they had no problem with a black,presendent.i don’t care if your white black blue red or purple.but I can see evil and his fake tears.that as tears of laughter at the fools who voted for him ,hes not the first black presentdent hes the first muslim presendent.so as far as that goes hes white ,and for thoses who voted for him I hope your proud f what you did or your kids and grandkids.because you might as well killed them yourself because in a way you did,how can you live with yourself/

    • 123z

      It is funny how WND is rigged. I tried to click on the down arrow (which shows in red, by the way) and when I clicked on it, it went down a number. It originally showed 4 in red, but when I clicked on it, it went down to 3 which changed from red to black. I wonder what all of this means? Tthis is probably how they maintain a minimal showing of disapproval of rightwing rantings. The disapproval rankings in red is probably to warn you that if you disapprove the Tea Party will get you. .

    • mrpoohead

      There is no Left in the US- even the Democrats are more right than the Tories in the UK. Nobody represents anything other than business in the US, which is why you’re stuffed!

    • Chalma Patterson

      Wow. Your last sentence says it all. This is what we need to stay focused on. Great post.

  • Silver Gonzales

    What can we say to the lib/left/progressive dimwits who continue to believe that Obama has done so much for the USA? I am from Canada and this is not the world when he took office in 2009. America and the West are really done in so many ways.

    • justquitnow

      I know….Obama spoiled all respect the world had for the US after the invasion of Iraq.

      • Tim Schwartz

        ” all respect the world had for the US after the invasion of Iraq.

        Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

        • NAHALKIDES

          They respected us or feared us, but the fact that we destroyed Saddam in a matter of weeks was not lost on the mullahs in Teheran, who were less brazen for a while about their nuclear ambitions, or on Col. Khaddafi, who abandoned his nuclear program. Of course, Bush messed up the post-invasion period by allowing Islam into the new Iraqui Constitution, but as in all things, Obama made the situation worse than it had been under Bush.

      • Well Done

        Fascinating that the left continue to pretend the invasion of Iraq was some kind of watershed. You lot will sink before you give up that bit of propaganda, won’t you? A coalition went into Iraq and made huge improvements. It was a miserable backwater. The “world” you refer to is of course merely the hard left academic koffee-klatch who hate whatever the U. S. does. Too fun.

        • justquitnow

          Another cultist….you see David, you bred these morons. This is your fault. This one actually has the entire world reduced down and squeezed into the boogeyman.

  • Musashi

    This is the best expose of the political and social mind of Liberals that I’ve ever ready. I am passing this article around to everyone that I know. I’ve said for many years that the Repulicans refuse to fight the agenda of the Left because they fear looking uncaring in the eyes of those that think they rely on government largess. If the Republicans don’t take a stand and speak to American’s hearts and show them, in simple terms, where the Dems have taken us and what the plans of the Left will do to our families and our country, then we are surely lost. Our country can’t survive a weak Republican Party. The Republican Party must fight for The People as hard as the Dems fight to destroy us. Unfortunately, I haven’t seen much that gives me hope. It’s becomes harder to help the people to understand when the media is a card-carrying memeber of the political Left.

    • sendtheclunkerbacktochicago

      Things are much worse than David Horowitz projects in this speech. We have a man who usurped the office of the POTUS. Did you read that, USURPED and he had much help in doing so. Some of that help comes from a “4th estate” that is a cesspool for Obama. Horowitz vetted this fraud but he fails to go far enough by not exposing the criminal and fraudulent activity that went into the usurping process. When will he start, when the psycho leaves office?

      • Randy Townsend

        The truth will never come out about Obama. The political devastation we would suffer if it were proven that he never should have held office is incalculable. Those responsible for this are sanitizing his background (or already have). And this will happen again, assuming the Anointed One doesn’t accomplish the task he was placed in office to do.

        • dixie68

          What you are saying is true, but I believe that if we survive his presidency, there will be enough books written to reveal the real obama, that there won’t be enough space to hold them.

      • NAHALKIDES

        Since Obama is now a lame duck, it’s more important to fight the Left as a whole than its top man at the moment. Leftism as an ideology must be fought, not Leftism in the person of Barry Obama.

        • sendtheclunkerbacktochicago

          No, the man needs to be in prison. He needs to be made an example of. He usurped the office of the POTUS for crying out loud. I hope you are in your 20s because it will take decades to accomplish what you are proposing. A vast majority of those in power or who will come to power come from radical progressive universities, the cesspool which feeds the 4th Estate. When you have organizations like FOX slandering those who dare challenge this Fraud in Chief’s eligibility, there is no place to go anymore. When you look at the entire Washington Press Corpse, Ed Henry is the ONLY one who will ask a moderately tough question. ONE and only ONE!!

          • The March Hare

            NAHALKIDES is partly right. It needs to be a two pronged fight. Leftism as an ideology and Obamaism. They can be fought separately or together, but both have to be fought.

  • Look_A_Squirrel

    This is a must read for everyone. Excellent.

    • wildjew

      Can you respond to my questions above?

  • Lanna

    Well said David and right on…we need to address the threats now…Knowledge is power, Wake up before its too late to do anything about the Debt, or about an Islamic Caliphate.

  • http://WhiteGirlBleedaLot.com/ ColinFlaherty

    profound and amazing. thank you.

  • taosnow

    Above the Gate of the Exchange were the words ObamaCare Macht Frei…..the lie of course….you enter the exchange to exchange you Freedom for ObamaCare

  • wildjew

    D. Horowitz wrote: “…the truly religious understand that we are the source of corruption and that redemption is only possible through the work of a Divinity. In contrast, progressives see themselves as the redeemers…Why did (they) BETRAY (emphasis mine) the war they had supported? ”

    I don’t claim to part of ‘the truly religious’. I believe in God; the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Beyond Iraq, where did we go so wrong that we opened the door for the unimaginable nightmare we have in the White House? For those who see things spiritually, who did conservatives and Republicans “betray” that God would turn this nation over to evil-doers? Who did Mitt Romney betray? God told Abraham (Abram), “I will bless those who bless you and the one who curses you, I will curse…The LORD appeared to Abram and said, “To your descendants I will give this land.” (Gen chapter 12:3,7)

    Does anyone remember what George W. Bush did (the enormous political capital he invested to execute his vision for the Middle East) only days after the 9/11 atrocities? What did Mitt Romney do to redress to Bush’s post 9/11 policies?

    • Look_A_Squirrel

      Can’t you read?

      • wildjew

        Can you answer my questions?

        Here, watch how Mitt Romney fought for the jihadists (God’s enemies) against conservative Christians on our national platform writing committee last year: http://www.c-spanvideo.org/clip/3875521

        Can you (WILL you) watch?

        • Seek

          Jim Talent, during his years as a member of Congress, made much of his born-again Christianity. The idea of such a man being anti-Christian is preposterous.

          • wildjew

            George W. Bush (I voted for him in 2000) made much of his Christianity (born-again Christianity), yet he elected to divide God’s land contrary to all the Biblical warnings; just as Senator Jim Talent did. I read an interview (I believe it was in the Washington Post) close to the point Obama was sworn into office (January 2009), where Bush told the interviewer he did NOT take the Bible literally. Can one be a true Christian, while at the same time publicly defying or flaunting God’s word to through His prophets? Did you watch Senator Talent in this video I posted? What did you think of President Bush cursing Abraham knowing (yourself that) God warned He would curse peoples and nations who curse His servant?

          • Robert

            Interesting you should mention that. There is another, the write of “Future History” who pointed out there were about 50 occasions where our American government has pressured the Israelis into giving away part of Yahowah’s (NOT “the Lord’s” – Lord is Satan’s title, describing his ambition to lord over, control, and enslave man, forcing man to bow down to him in submission) land to the most openly Satanic enemies (Islam – meaning Submission), and each time some kind of “seismos” – Greek for storm, earthquake, natural disaster – or market crash has hit the U.S. within 48 hours. Including Hurricane Katrina just hours after getting the Israelis to abandon Gaza to the Islamic enemy. You would think one of our presidents could overcome the temptation of pride derived from hoping to be THE one who brings peace to the Middle East, take notice, and recognize it is not the place of a mere mortal to pressure Abraham’s descendants into giving away Yahowah’s land to His and their sworn enemies.

    • NAHALKIDES

      Conservatives didn’t betray anyone – the Republican Establishment, which is anti-Conservative, did. We must fight that Establishment and win before we can fight the Left through the GOP.

      • wildjew

        How do we know a conservative from a non-conservative? Didn’t millions of conservatives continue to support George W. Bush after he betrayed Israel early October 2001; after he repeatedly mislead the American people about the ‘religion of peace’?

  • Gamal

    One simple argument that the Conservatives could make that I have never heard them make is “If you want to be on food stamps, vote for Obama, if you want to make money vote for me.” People vote for positive messages. If you say America is headed for disaster that doesn’t resonate. If you say I can do better that resonates. Mitt Romney gave up on the people on the dole. Instead he should have said the above slogan to them. The Democrats said that Mitt was out of touch because of his wealth. Romney should have said I want to make all of you wealthy like me. That would have made him very in touch with everybody.

    • cedarbend

      Too many people now would choose the food stamp route…pride and industry have fallen in popularity in recent times….

      • Gamal

        People want to be rich no matter how lazy they are.

  • Hank Rearden

    Great piece, David. Keep shouting it from the rooftops. And let’s get behind Allen West who understands this message and will carry it into battle!!

  • MidSouthMitch

    Very well said! This needs to be read by every American!!!

    WILL YOU MAKE REPRINTS AVAILABLE, or grant permission to reproduce & distribute electronically?

    • david horowitz

      We will, but you are also free to reproduce and distribute electronically.

      • MidSouthMitch

        Thank you! Again- WELL said!

      • KenPetkau

        Thank you for this article. I’m from Canada. Most of my paternal side of the family lived in the Soviet Union for seventy years. Most of the males died in labour camps. A few were shot in the back of the head. My gpa escaped in 1926. So I know all about how the communist mindset works, and I have been saying for decades what you said in this piece.

  • Unc Remus

    This should be required reading in every HS Civics class in America….If they still have Civics Classes…

    • cedarbend

      I don’t think they do…bullying, sex-ed and racial guilt take up most of the time once allotted to useful, truthful disciplines…

  • james connolly

    An outstanding, brilliant assessment of the hellish horrors we face under a totally oppressive, socialist, anti-American regime intoxicated by its own power. Dinesh D’Souza’s thesis in “Obama’s America: Unmaking the American Dream,” is playing out right before our eyes. Mr. D’Souza warned us. He was right, but very few were listening. As life in this country becomes much worse, maybe more will listen.

    But don’t count on it. Obama & Co. are such masterful, deceitful and lying thugs that they will always try to convince the masses that they are the saviors of the nation and the little guy, and all conservatives are Satan. Up to now, they have been winning.

  • justquitnow

    The threat we face is from an ideology that you get to define and decide who gets saddled with it? I blame you David, for years and years of this…for these posters on your site and others that cannot think outside of the left vs right dichotomy that you trap all reason and thought into. You are the grandpappy of this pseudo-religious cult that is robbing people of their reason and sense of well being. After all this time you are still here saying the EXACT SAME @#^@*@() THING as you did ten years ago and twenty years ago.

    Did getting in a scuffle with West and being caught on the business end of the cult teach you anything….like calling people commies is easy David…it’s &@)(#_@ easy. Set them up and shoot them down. All you have to be is self righteous enough to set yourself up as the master of freedom. Thanks to you I have illiterate cultic douchebags that can’t argue their way out of a wet paper bag, using all your intellectually dishonest tools right out of the gate. Grats David…living the dream.

    • Biff Henderson

      You dismiss David Horowitz’s message with a broad brush. How convenient. Humor me. Cite one example of the application of an intellectually dishonest tool. Let this “illiterate cultic douchbag” be the judge of you raising above the rhetoric.

      • justquitnow

        If someone in a crowd yells “Hey you ugly stupid, piece of sh*t”…it’s probably best you don’t stand up and say “you talking to me?”

        • Biff Henderson

          I thought as much. You desire to be dismissed as a just another blowhard. Your wish is fulfilled.

    • JamesJ

      Yes, the world would be a utopia if only the entire world thought like you.

      • justquitnow

        Thank you James…there’s one example.

    • NAHALKIDES

      Why don’t you leave and never return? You’ve nothing to contribute to the discussion.

  • taosnow

    If I was a conspiracy nut I might think the Democrats were disappointed Mitt Lost….They already had 2 huge victories…Obama himself and ObamaCare….both destined to fail….but the symbolism was priceless…..If Romney had won , all todays chaos would be the fault of the GOP ( not to mention white men ) paving the way for Hillary , and years of trying to fix the mess Obama made with new fixes needing more Government….Who will Hillary have to Blame now ?

  • danshanteal

    The raison d’etre for the young GOP senate turks. I wrote out a check to Cruz this A.M. It’ll be in the mail this afternoon.

    RTe

  • http://www.clarespark.com/ Clare Spark

    My only difference with this position paper is that I would call the looming one party dictatorship fascist, not communist. Mostly because of the furtive racialist discourse that mimics Hitler and that hates Jews and “individualism.” I wrote a bit about this here: http://clarespark.com/2012/07/19/communist-ideas-go-mainstream/. “Communist ideas go mainstream.” The original Progressives were anything but left wing, but laid the groundwork for a one party dictatorship and the organic nation that frighteningly resembles the statism of Mussolini.

    • The March Hare

      I would agree with this since Mussolini left production in the hands of private ownership and controlled business and industry with repressive regulations which was what his fascism was. These people sprang from communist roots, but don’t want to seize the means of production since it would drive away the support of the masses. They can do the same thing by using fascist tactics. They have always known this and have planned it this way being one of the new things about the new left. The communists didn’t exactly treat the Jews very well either, forcing them into ghettos and brutalizing them, but at least they didn’t round them up and gas them.

      • ReyR

        Is that so? Jews held more than a half of positions on the Bolshevik government under Lenin.

        • The March Hare

          True, regarding the ghettos, I am confusing Tsarist Russia with conditions after the revolution. I had to go back and look it up.
          Source: Wikipedia.
          There were Jews taking part in the revolution and participated in government under Lenin, but there was constant anti-Semitism. Lenin spoke against anti-Semitism, but there were still pogroms carried out by the red army during the war with Poland which was ignored. The 1921 anti-religious laws which applied to all caused Jewish properties including synagogues to be seized, and Jewish communities to be dissolved which caused more persecution. After Lenin’s death in 1924 Stalin maneuvered against others and gained total power for
          himself in lieu of collective rule and even forced Trotsky into exile. While he pretended to be against anti-Semitism, he was, in fact, an anti-Semite. In the
          mid 1930s Jewish leaders were arrested and executed during Stalin’s purges. Studying the Hebrew language would get you sentenced for counter revolutionary and anti-Soviet activities. In anticipation of the pact with
          Hitler, in 1939 he ordered the ministry purged of Jews to appease Hitler. Jewish participation in government dropped to 5% by 1940. In 1952-1953 all Jews were removed from the security services and the MGB.
          So, my previous statement stands: the communists didn’t exactly treat the Jews very well either.

          • ReyR

            Frankly, I would recommend against believing the source according to whom Thomas James Ball never existed. Unlike the Poles, we over here never had a problem with Jews. Take it from me, my mother’s dad was Jewish. He spoke Yiddish as his native tongue. He and his family never lived in any ghetto. Most things you hear and read about us in the West are simply lies. Hey, do you know that our Soviet starry-eyed Jewish idealists established an anti-Israel in the Russian Far East? Some Jewish people have been repatriating from the ME, but of course you won’t even hear about it.

          • The March Hare

            Maybe you didn’t notice I retracted the part about the ghettos.

          • ReyR

            I noticed. But you wrote “I am confusing Tsarist Russia with conditions after the revolution”. Russian Jews never lived in ghettos. My grandpa originally grew up in Armavir, in the Northern Caucasus, he used to tell me about how it was. An old friend of his was originally from Kazan – no ghettos again. On the other hand, it was different in Ukraine, particularly Western Ukraine – but this is the Polish influence, Poles have always been notorious Jew haters, as Catholics. My granddad also used to repeat that we were lucky to live in a secular society. Decades later, I agree.
            Vasily Grossman, a prominent Russian Jewish novelist, described Russian Jewry well in his Life and Fate. The novel was in fact outlawed in the Soviet Union, and I always found the fact hard to understand: there’s nothing anti-Soviet about the book. If you care to learn something from the horse’s mouth, an English translation exists.

          • The March Hare

            More research and I have to admit that much of you say is correct, however, on the Wikipedia site, on History of the Jews in Russia, there is much documentation, as I listed above, on anti-Semitism and purges of Jews which was what my impressions were. There were several waves of emigration due to their mistreatment. I am a contract engineer and back in 1982 there was a Russian engineer that worked for me for about 6 months, who in the late 70s had taken advantage of the open door that happened for the Jews and brought his family to America. He struggled with the language due to his having to learn it in his late 40s and he and I became friends. He told me much about life in Russia and we constantly found ourselves working side by side or in near proximity to each other for years afterwards. They had left due to the intense anti-Semitism which is borne out by the Wikipedia article which included the emigration of the 70s which is when they had left.

          • The March Hare

            By the way. I just got around to looking up Thomas James Ball and found the Wikipedia entry about him. He took his life on June 15, 211 and the article was last modified on June 22, 2011 just one week after. Why would you say that source treated him as if he never existed? What you have to be careful of with Wikipedia is that leftists use it to create false images of those on the right to smear them or put a leftists slant on events. Any leftists slant on the USSR is going to be less harsh on the communists than would otherwise be.

          • ReyR

            If you open the Wikipedia homepage and type “Thomas James Ball”, the search function will spit out a truckload of results, but Thomas James Ball is not among them.
            If you click the “Ball (surname)” link, Thomas James Ball is not there.
            If you look up “Self-immolation” in the WP, TJB is not there.
            If you search the “List of political self-immolations” page, Thomas Ball is there, finally, but he was not there recently, take it from me.
            You can certainly find him if you google “Thomas James Ball”, but the page that opens is not a WP page, just look at the address bar: its a powernpraise.com page.
            You can also find “The Organized Silencing of a Man Publicly Burned to Death” and other publications that prove my point. No reports about his suicide reached the MSM, and the WP page created by those who cared was deleted by WP collegiate decision as “not newsworthy” within hours.
            On the same google page, you’ll see “Wikipedia: Requests for undeletion”. Multiple requests were rejected. According to WP, TJB never existed.

          • defcon 4

            But why did the USSR support the formation of the state of Israel?

          • The March Hare

            Further, in the Wikipedia entry cited above:

            Without changing its official anti-Zionist stance, from late 1944 until 1948 Joseph Stalin had adopted a de facto pro-Zionist foreign policy, apparently believing that the new country would be socialist and would speed the decline of British influence in the Middle East.

            By the end of 1957 the USSR switched sides in the Arab–Israeli conflict and throughout the course of the Cold War unequivocally supported various Arab regimes against Israel. The official position of the Soviet Union and its satellite states and agencies was that Zionism was a tool used by the Jews and Americans for “racist imperialism”.
            For more information see Wikipedia: History of the Jews in Russia

    • KenPetkau

      Both fascists and communists are rooted in Marxism, and both equally vicious and evil. Read Friedrich Hayek, “The Road to Serfdom”.

      The point is that this has come by stealth, bit by bit, as they have smartened up some.

  • rsilverm

    Nice speech, David. It’s a shame that people on the left simply cannot process what you’re talking about when you make conservative points. It’s not that they merely disagree, it’s more as if they cannot understand the language.

    • defcon 4

      Mr. Horowitz is an excellent speaker, when he’s not being interrupted by brainwashed lefties and islam0fascists. He used to speak at universities and colleges, back when they at least pretended to believe in academic honesty and integrity. The youtube videos of his speeches are excellent and worth watching.

    • Michael__Durham

      You are 100% correct, rsilverm.

      Expecting these brainwashed, cradle-to-grave Leftists to even remotely comprehend the points David Horowitz is making is like expecting a fish in the ocean to understand what “wet” means.

      Our hypothetical, Leftist fish: “Wet? What do you mean, ‘wet’?”

      Then, after you explain it to the fish: “As opposed to what? What OTHER way is there to be?”

      This is what we’re up against. Many generations of it, and many millions of such “fish”. The situation is hopeless. The rot and subversion runs too deep, and it is too self-sustaining. Unless…

      …unless there is some sort of “God”…for which I have seen no evidence. I am a dyed-in-the-wool American conservative patriot, but an agnostic one.

      Hardcore Leninist-Leftist radicals (“progressives” and “liberals”) are not encumbered by any divinity or associated belief systems. They are devoted atheists.This is a huge advantage for them, on this earthly plane.Their “morality” consists simply in that which further assures and propels their tyrannical, political power and stranglehold over entire populations.

      • Surry918

        Your last 2 paragraphs were perfect. And a realistic analysis of what we face. I am exactly what you describe yourself as, and I fear that there aren’t too many of us that feel this way.

        • Michael__Durham

          Thank you for your kind words, Surry918. That makes us a minority of 2. Let’s see if that number can’t increase among the regulars on this blogsite.

      • Robert

        If you’re looking for evidence of Yahowah (a.k.a.God), look at all the prophecies he inspired his various prophets to write, hundreds of which have been fulfilled. You can decide for yourself if it was divine inspiration from a deity with the dimension of time reporting what he has seen in our future, or an incredibly lucky, 1 in more than 10^65 long shot that all those prophecies came to pass in all their improbable details. If that’s not enough, there should be The Tribulation running from 2026-2033, and you can compare what the prophet Yahowchanan (a.k.a. John) scribed in Revelation with what happens then.
        Those who survive The Tribulation and are counted among the sheep should see conditions like in Eden over the entire world, with all satanic deceivers and oppressors like Obama, Reid, and Pelosi cleansed from the face of the Earth. And those who would rather not go through the nastiness of the coming Tribulation, there’s still time to become part of the Philadelphia called-out assembly that will be harvested ahead of it in one of the next 13 years.

        • Michael__Durham

          …um… …’kay.

      • I can’t tell m name

        You keep quoting David Horowitz. He hates blacks, Arabs, Europeans and everyone who doesn’t kiss Netanyahu’s butt.

    • ront456

      Brilliantly put, rsilverm. I’m always tempted to share particulary cogent analysis (such as this speech) with my left wing aquaintances. But I always stop myself. It’s just not worth the headache and it never changes anything. Sadly.

  • Not Chicken Little

    This is a great piece and I see he is in at least partial agreement with Diana West who has detailed the Communist influence in our country and our government, since before WWII and continuing to this day.

    Allow me to summarize: Liberals lie!

  • John K.

    What a wonderful, insightful article which clearly sums up our present dilemma as well as the thinking of the Obama crowd. I hope the GOP in Congress toughens up to this petty tyrant and, just as importantly, gets a spokesperson who can clearly and convincingly explain to the average American the dangers we face. The GOP needs to show the issue is not political gamesmanship but survival of the dollar as a currency with value, survival of middle class and survival of America as a place of liberty. God bless you all !

  • logdon

    A wonderful piece written by a master with the experience, knowledge and mental processing power sadly lacking in any, and I mean any politician currently operating on a global stage.

    Although I still think Iraq was a complete disaster which by removing a tyrant unleashed hundreds of them, David’s analysis blaming tactics rather than strategy and absolving Bush from the lies and smears of the left is most convincing.

    And as for the so called ‘Arab Spring’ leftist supporters what utter hypocrisy?

    They epitomise Orwell’s four legs/two legs transition perfectly.

    A classic of make the story fit whoever’s telling it and identity politics at it’s very worst.

    The world swooned when America voted in it’s first black President, merely because he could tell a teleprompter tale and because he was black. (Or half black to be more accurate but neatly massaged because his white half, both to them and him holds no cache).

    It heralded the worst POTUS ever, a lapsed Muslim at best who has ushered and enabled MB infiltration at the highest level.

    They’re not swooning now and even Egypt where he kicked off not only his inaugural overseas message but one which glorified Islam to the heavens despises him.

    Then there’s Syria and Putin’s triumph and Iran and their little game of run around shallow deception which he tries to foist upon us all.

    The man is an absolute disaster yet for instance our Cameron is so far up his fundament that only the tips of his well polished Lobbs are showing.

    A grovelling ever so ‘umble big ‘C’ Conservative old Etonian and a darkish Marxist US President in lockstep.

    That’s what it’s come to. Dumb and dumber, indeed.

  • M.R. Canon

    David Horowitz’s account needs to be studied by every student in high school. They have remained ignorant because parents have not protected them from being overwhelmed with lies from activist “broadminded,” always seductive, anti-American teachers, who mostly gained their educations at liberal colleges. Even the Board of Directors (one of whom was conservative Steve Forbes) at Princeton didn’t make a squeak when the “world’s most seductive proponent of genocidal euthanasia,” Peter Singer, was ushered on the sly into Princeton into a tenured chair at Princeton by hillary, bill clinton, and the director of their new bioethics commission, Howard Shapiro, who was also president of Princeton. Forbes removed his money from Princeton, but it was too late to get rid of Singer. Since 1999, the atheist Singer has been teaching our “best and brightest” how they can and should rid the world early of elderly/disabled/mentally deficient humans. With obamacare, how difficult will it be to make final decisions like those routinely made by UK’s National Health Service who are put into their Liverpool Pathway Program?

  • sonoftompaine

    David is to be congratulated for finally coming clean, finally declaring that “so-called liberals and progressives” are all part of the shift to soviet communism.
    Two years ago, at an FOA gathering, I will never forget David’s immediate anger towards me when I asked him why he always calls all these destructive people the good words of “liberal” and “progressive”. His many newsletters have been packed full of otherwise great articles that falsely used the word “liberal/progressive”, when he was describing or quoting communists. This article, here in October 2013, is David’s brilliant recognition that words honesty count. “So-called liberals”, ARE destroying this nation, the democrat party is the virtual same thing, also destroying this nation.
    Thank you, David, for joining in with all libertarians, free market economists, Austrian school, Ayn Rand objectivists, all people who believe in the core values of America, all the people that do not call communists the good name of liberal. Let’s face it, LIBERAL MEANS FREEDOM, always has.
    Congratulations to David for coming clean in this wonderful speech, article, body of his own revealing words. And, ALSO, the most perfect blast on The Crime of Benghazi, that I have yet to read. The imposter commie president and his frightening aid, commie Hillary Clinton, are perhaps the two foulest people in the public eye, in our lifetime.

    • vulgar_imposter

      LOL! Another angry white guy craps out an opinion.

      • gotham1883

        Go away zombie. You have no place in human conversation. Go eat your fellow zombie. Zombies are good for only one thing.

      • lawson guffey

        What the problem vulgar imposter are you afraid of the truth? I will inform NSA to take down your IP and then have them send in the IRS to do an audit since I work for the King.

      • defcon 4

        Another racist comes out of the closet.

      • D Dev

        another angry white guy??? are you a racist?

        • cedarbend

          He can’t possibly be a racist…he’s a member of the tolerant Left. Charming, isn’t he?

    • kay2861

      I agree with you that these people are socialists/Marxists/Communists, but I don’t think David Horowitz was trying to ignore that fact when he used the words liberal and Progressive. I just think if you don’t articulate the words they use for themselves, then you haven’t connected the dots for the American people. My mother-in-law is a diehard liberal, and she knows that Hillary Clinton is a “progressive”, but she didn’t know what that meant until I defined it or her. So you have to use the term Progressive, and then follow that up by saying that this is just a “pretty” word for communist. The problem is the words they use for themselves change once people are on to them, so it keeps us on our toes.

  • russhenry

    OBAMA THE ILLEGAL ALIEN AND A COMPLICIT CONGRESS

    January 19, 2013

    OBAMA IS NOT A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES!

    OBAMA DOES NOT HAVE A LEGAL AMERICAN BIRTH CERTIFICATE!

    OBAMA HAS A FRAUDULENT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER!

    OBAMA HAS A FORGED DRAFT CARD!

    THIS HAS BEEN PROVEN BY A LEGAL AUTHORITY – SHERIFF JOSEPH ARPAIO OF ARIZONA.

    THESE ARE FELONIES!

    OBAMA’S LEGAL NAME IS BARRY SOETORO AS SHOWN ON HIS COLLEGE RECORDS!

    OBAMA IS A MUSLIM AS HE SAID TO GEORGE STEPHANOPOLIS ON ABC TV BEFORE THE 2008 ELECTION!

    AN INVESTIGATION MUST BE INITIATED IN THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE!

    CONTACT:

    CONGRESSMAN ROBERT GOODLATTE, (R-VA 6TH DISTRICT)

    CHAIRMAN OF HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE

    PHONE: 202-224-5431 AND 540-857-2672

    FAX: 202-225-9681

    CONGRESSWOMAN RENEE ELLMERS (R-NC 2ND DISTRICT)

    PHONE: 910-230-1910 AND 202-225-4531

    FAX: 202-225-5662 AND 910-230-1940

    ONCE BARRY SOETORO, AKA BARACK OBAMA, IS CONVICTED AND REMOVED FROM OFFICE WE WILL NULLIFY ALL HE HAS DONE INCLUDING OBAMACARE AND THE TWO SUPREME COURT JUSTICES HE NOMINATED!

    TAKE ACTION IT IS CRITICAL !

    • vulgar_imposter

      LOL! Another tin foil hat wearer emerges from the trailer park to offer his two cents! I love it! You losers are so angry, so vengeful, so delusional, so hateful. But keep on keepin’ on. You’re always good for a laugh.

      • Jersey Fatmouth

        Idiot: why so angry with all the name calling? Can’t you seriously debate the issues or is everything for you built on emotion and immaturity?

      • Mimi Mayes

        Every bit of that is true. So that makes you, Vulgar, the tinfoil hatter.

      • cedarbend

        “…from the trailer park..”. Another non-bigoted, tolerant and loving member of the Left. Can’t ya just feel the love?!

      • defcon 4

        Yeah supporting the rights enshrined in the US Constitution and Bill of Rights certainly is hateful isn’t it?

    • laura

      obama became sortero when his mother re married her second husband.

  • Brand

    Check out:

    “Skanderbeg,Albanian Prince,pretended to be Muslim for more than 20 years,Retracted and fought the Turks”

    http://www.antisharia.com/2011/07/31/skanderbegalbanian-princepretended-to-be-muslim-for-more-than-20-yearsretracted-and-fought-the-turks/

    “Sinan,the Greatest Architect of all Time of the Ottoman Empire,was a Christian who at 21 was Forced to become a Muslim”

    http://www.antisharia.com/2011/08/18/sinanthe-greatest-architect-of-all-time-of-the-ottoman-empirewas-a-christian-who-at-21-was-forced-to-become-a-muslim/

  • ReyR

    Diana West this, Horowitz that, apologists, accomplices, Roosevelt, Stalin, Russian stooges, KGB, betrayal, poisoned daggers, heritage…
    Incessant sectarian squabbles.
    You are a family lost in a loud fight over a long-past feud with a distant neighbor who doesn’t care, while your own house is on fire…

    • JamesJ

      Good point Comrade

  • vulgar_imposter

    HA! HA! HA! The only people on the planet who take David Horowitz seriously are crackpots, wingnuts, gun nuts, window lickers, tin foil hat wearers, and Tea baggers. So, keep writing and giving speeches, David. You are not making a difference AT ALL. You will continued to be ignored by all but obese, angry, Teabagging white guys.

    • Jersey Fatmouth

      Idiot: you mean gun nuts like the rappers you idolize who parade weapons in most of their videos? Get a clue and put the bong down.

    • kay2861

      Who is paying you, troll? Are you on George Soros’ payroll?

      • monodist

        No, Reince…he is not.

    • Bert

      Notice that the left is incapable of rational thought and can only spew hatred. We can also remind these creatures that the term “teabagging” is their own vulgar term for what Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky were doing to each other in the oval office when he had his pants down and she was on her knees. Very presidential! When I hear a leftist use that term I think of that famous blue dress with the stain on it and Clinton issuing his well known lying denial. I also feel that the name “vulgar_imposter” aptly describes this creature.

      • monodist

        …the term “teabagging” is their own vulgar term

        From wikipedia:

        In February 2009, a conservative protester was photographed with a sign using the words “tea bag” as a verb, which swiftly led to left-leaning websites like Wonkette introducingteabagger as a derogatory term for Tea Partiers later in February 2009.

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_bag_(sexual_act)

    • NAHALKIDES

      Truly your name is well-chosen, vulgar_imposter, for you have no reason to be here posing as a reasonable commentator, and you’re certainly vulgar.

      • monodist

        Right wing attempted censorship. #FAIL

  • daisypony

    Why do so many Americans not believe what is right under their noses?

    • laura

      they follow leaders. they cannot think critically. they are infantile, americans are soft & spoiled & looking for a parental figure. oh yes, follow the dialogue of the day.

    • peacesnail

      The communist controlled education system is dumbing people down…that’s why.

      • The March Hare

        Dumbing them down, filling their heads with propaganda and has been doing it for decades.

    • monodist

      I swear, I do believe in my lips. On my Honor.

  • http://cogitarus.wordpress.com/ ★✩★ David ★✩★

    Excellent excellent excellent! A Must Read! Horowitz is a brilliant man and a patriot of the highest order!

    • vulgar_imposter

      LOL! You’re an idiot.

      • Jersey Fatmouth

        OMG! LOL! HAHA!

      • http://cogitarus.wordpress.com/ ★✩★ David ★✩★

        Thank you for your kind words. You are a bit lower than an idiot.

        • Icebow

          If memory serves, idiot used to be the lowest category, immediately below imbecile, which in turn was below moron. Of course, in those days trolls were strictly mythical.

          • monodist

            Back when Republicans governed rather than terrorized?

      • defcon 4

        Said the moron, loudly.

  • P_Ang

    One of the best and most insightful articles I have ever read. I wish I had a blog just so I could re-post it somewhere.

    • The March Hare

      Send a link to everyone you think will benefit by reading it.

  • defcon 4

    There are no public tours of the WH anymore. I’ve always wondered if a reason was given?

    • The March Hare

      It was supposed to be a result of the sequester.

  • Randy Townsend

    All true… and now the bad part: Even with this information, almost half of “Americans” would support any candidate who proposed the same things. The parasites are outnumbering the producers and as long as they are “taken care of”, they’ll gladly vote our freedoms goodbye. This will not end peacefully, for as much as the left is willing to fight for what it wants to impose, there are plenty on the right that will fight as well (sort of explains the drive by the left for more “reasonable gun control” since we all know who owns firearms, don’t we?).

    • monodist

      Didn’t you mean to say the majority rather than just almost half?

      • Randy Townsend

        Is it legal for “mentally disturbed teenagers who shoot up our schools” to own firearms? If that’s the best you have, stay in your parent’s basement and keep playing video games.

  • nonaligned

    Insane ramblings from a paranoid. Paranoid types can also be highly verbally adept, as this man is. But he clearly lives in a parallel universe. One where Bush did not go to war over weapons of mass destruction that never existed. One where four dead in Benghazi (after the house cut 300 million from state department funds) is somehow worse than the 10 attacks and 60 people who died on Bush’s watch. or the 263 dead in Libya under Reagan. The fact is, Bush lied to congress and to the country. I heard him. I know that the rabid consumers of this trash will say “there goes another brainwashed socialist”. I am registered as a republican for 30 years. But the party no longer stands for anything I agree with. It has become the servant of the rich and powerful. This drivel, supporting the attempt to drive us into a default over a law passed, signed and validated in the supreme court, is dangerous nonsense.

    • Skeptic7

      Democrats are sociopaths torturing children in inner cities. The proof is overwhelming.

    • I.m. Strandedinsonoma

      Except that there WERE weapons of mass destruction. Read this. So your Bush Derangement Syndrome is apparent. Oh, and on liberal sites, I say I’m a 30 year registered democrat. Close, but no cigar.

    • Adamon

      Whatever negatives about the Bush administration this “nonaligned” propagandist can name or think up DO NOT CHANGE A WORD in the list of facts about the 0bama regime.
      Even if the president preceding 0bama was a real monster, that would not change anything in the list of FACTS about the 0bama regime.

      • monodist

        Thank God, that’s settled. I agree.

    • The March Hare

      “I am registered as a republican for 30 years”
      Eh…. Sure Doc, and I’m the Easter Bunny.

      • monodist

        Yeah, I find it hard to believe that anyone who calls themselves a Republican would believe that Bush lied, let alone trashed the economy and lost $12 billion in cash just in Baghdad alone!

  • gotham1883

    Well said.

  • gotham1883

    There is only one thing communists are good at, ruling. They want absolute power so that they can do whatever they want to whoever they want. Yes, it is evil, but evil has attractions for those who value little in life besides power, and there are always lots of those people handy.

  • Bruiser in Houston

    Outstanding!

  • Donald J DaCosta

    A great read for anyone scratching their head, wondering what the heck is going on in America and actually cares to know the facts. That these Progressives spew their nonsensical drivel with impunity while Mr. Horowitz and his ilk are deemed members of a radical, conservative, tea “bagger,” kook fringe says much about how far America has fallen and how supremely important to our survival is a truly free, impartial press. There is much else of importance but all could be severely rattled and weakened by wide spread exposure to some cogent, common sense analysis such as appears in this article.

  • Juan Viche

    Private Attorney General in USA blows the lid off the Federal Reserve System
    http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2013/10/private-attorney-general-in-usa-blows-the-lid-off-the-federal-reserve-system.html
    Constitution, citizens, and the united states; an interview with Paul Andrew Mitchell

    http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2013/10/paul-andrew-mitchell-constitution-citizens-and-the-united-states.html

  • laura

    mr. horowitz: how do explain huma marrying a jew? somehow this doesnt compute. what is the agenda here? (artical is one of your best).

    • eromhsa

      Obama has Jews that he has appointed, sauch as Rahm Imanuel. What you must realize is, that many Jews aren’t religious Jews, both agnostic and atheist. Thus, as long as you agree with the progressive agenda, or the Islamist agenda, you can be whatever you want. It’s all about ideology.

      • laura

        isnt it against muslim law/ideology for a woman to marry a jew? im not interested in anthony, but the perceptive of humas family. (??)

        • defcon 4

          How do you know Wiener isn’t a muslime? You know muslimes are allowed to lie about their faith right? You know the holey prophet himself encouraged one of his followers to lie about being a muslime in order to carry out a hit against one of his detractors right?

          • laura

            i dont know if jewish men are allowed to convert to islam. something is strange about this relationship. basically he is a nobody, not from a wealthy family, no connections there. he married her for his personal gain, but i cant understand why the brotherhood would need this guy.

  • John Bball

    Conservatives….please call Communists Communists! Conservatives stop fighting fair…stop bringing a plastic spork to a gun fight!

  • Mr. Rachford’s ire

    Great man and cause.
    This is what Dr. Anthony Napoleon talked about in ‘The Progress Virus” and New book about Marxist. All on Amazon
    Would be great to bring these two great men together. Maybe we can!

  • peacesnail

    Obama, his insidious little troll spokesmouth, Carney, Reid and Pilosi are the at the forefront of the reshaping of America in becoming their new liberal utopia to be known as USSA.

  • winstonS

    An excellent speech/essay and very helpful by putting in a clear straightforward manner a description of the enemy now inside the gates of the American Republic. A major problem is the GOP, the only political party available to the Conservatives, doesn’t have the courage or ability to effectively oppose the Fascist threat that has taken the reins of the country’s executive apparatus.

  • Mr. W. H. Braden

    Excellent. Thank you sir, maybe the FBI should get a copy. Maybe every Democrat Party voter who loves American need get this article? Please God Almighty save us from our ignorance. If Hillary is given the WH she will finish Obama’s Revenge.

    • Adamon

      Isn’t the FBI part of the current regime, Mr. Braden?

      • fedupMan

        Even the FBI does what it is told to do these days.

        • nulltransform

          Even the National Park Service does what it is told these days.

          • monodist

            Yeah, what the heck is with this top-down governmental structure we have, anyways?

  • laura

    horowitz, i am from one of those families you mention. in due respect, not all of these people were supporting communism. my mother said “socialist is good” “communism was TERRIBLE”. there was a distinction. do you know anything about the workmans circle orgnization? my grandparents either started it, or were very active. were they out & out communists? my father went to the WC youth club meetings. his ideas were very controlling. my mothers not so extreme. i read on your site that there was a bust of carl marx in the lobby of the jewish daily foward. wasnt that the only yiddish publication @ the time? my fathers parents read it, & my grandfather on my mothers side. their english reading skills were not great. what else were they supposed to read?

    • Adamon

      laura, As any communist will tell you, socialism is but a stage of the “historical process” leading to communism.
      This is one of basic canons of the faith.

      • laura

        that may be true. but i dont think most of these old jews were thinking about lenin & stalin. they wanted social programs like social security, workers rights. there was no welfare culture then, everyone worked. also a govt job, was supposed to be a secure job. my father was against indivual rights, he was the extremist. as for interracial stuff, that was a nono. the last thing they wanted was to live amoungst blacks. i did hear marx disliked blacks, but i doute it is related. all my family voted democrat, even the self starters who worked for themselves. as evan sayet said, you just went along w/the narrative.

        • JVR

          This may well be the case.

          Far more interesting in looking at international communism was when I noticed that the South African Communist Party in the 1960s, then part of the anti-apartheid effort, had leaders (Joe Slovo, Ruth First, Turok, etc) who were (1) committed Communists and (2) refugees who fled Communism after WW2 from places such as Latvia and Lithuania.

          So they fled communism in the USSR only to establish a very hard line Communist party in South Africa.

          I am pretty sure this same phenomenon occurred in the USA, where post-WW2 refugees from Communism formed very hard line Communist parties and groups in Western states…

        • monodist

          the last thing they wanted was to live amoungst blacks.

          Who would? I’ve never even had the choice ! Many colors and races just shoved down my throat like Obamacare. Nobody even ASKED me.

          I feel ‘ya, laura.

          • laura

            remember, everything is based upon $$. if you have that, then you can move where you want too. democrats have been running from black/hispanic ghettos for years.

  • Taimoor Khan

    Stupid start. The focus of Christianity is to ultimately achieve 100% Christian world, thus missionary and proselytizing… Let’s ban all democratic governments in Christian countries and start killing Christians…

    If the start is rotten, the rest can be predicted.

    • defcon 4

      WHen a muslimes points the finger of accusation at anyone, a thousand fingers point back at him and islam.

  • NAHALKIDES

    Once again. Horowitz proves that he understands the New Left at its rotten core better than any writer still alive. And he is absolutely correct that Conservatives need to speak up for the common man, and speak of freedom – something the Republican Establishment has never done and will never do. The only thing I could add to his speech would be to call for Conservatives to claim the control of the Republican Party our numbers and our ideas entitle us to.

  • JVR

    This is a rousing and very good speech, and I cannot find much wrong with it, except perhaps for the last paragraph where Horowitz states that “The most important battle in the world today is not being waged in the
    Middle East but here at home in the United States. If we lose this
    battle, everything is lost. But if we will take the measure of the
    enemies of freedom and prepare ourselves to fight them, we have a better
    than even chance to win…”

    It seems natural to believe that there are universal and invariant principles underlying the Left-Right debate, but this cannot be so. As the USA is undergoing a demographic inversion it is unlikely that the current Left-Right dispute (as explained by Horowitz above) will remain the same.

    The populations from which the (current) Leftwing and Rightwing ideologies flow are crashing — the Left faster than the Right. With these declining populations, the current Left and Right, both rooted in European political philosophy, are going extinct.

    Eventually both the Left and the Right will be taken over by a new Third World demography in the USA, and it is very unlikely that the same kind of Leftwing or Rightwing ideology seen today will flow from this non-European populations.

    So one can make a couple of predictions: (1) The current Leftwing alliance of immigrants and minorities is stable and is in fact a winning alliance. It is also the defining part of American politics and culture. (2) The “white Right”, as in the GOP, is on its last legs — it may make some last minutes gasps for a last grasp at power, but it is really over for them. (3) The white Left’s demography is crashing even faster than that of the Right. This is cushioned by the surging demography of (leftwing voting) minorities and 3rd world immigrants. Eventually, the white Left will also go under, and it is very unlikely that their successors will be leftwing in the way the white Left is leftwing today.

    One should note that a surging minority population will also increase the rate of migration of minorities to the USA — in fact, the election of Barack Obama has demonstrated to the African continent that America is the place that will receive them. Formerly the Lady looked to Europe, these days I image that the teeming slums of Nairobi and Lagos are full of children dreaming of making it to America, and many will.

    The conclusion? That the USA will be changed very much by 2050, with the remnants of the Left and minorities running the show. The white Right, or what remains of them, will have adapted to live in dhimmitude in this new (inverted) relationship. This, of course, is so provided that there is no uprising.

    Getting from here to 2050 will bring many stresses — you should consider the psychological side of this, as former minorities take over they will start to assert themselves, and one can see outbreaks of displays of dominance, at least locally, already in several cities of the USA — humans are still primates, and we all share the basic underlying psychology of seeking dominance and vanquishing and controlling those we take over.

    • monodist

      Your logic goes so quickly and completely off the deep end that reading your post was like watching a blind man walk in front of a train. I wanted to stop you, but I couldn’t.

      Painful. Sad…

  • IdolHanz

    Now that its been shown that going to war in Syria wasn’t necessary, then Obamacare is not necessary either!

    • monodist

      And since Syria has been diplomatically handled, we’ll be able to rollback the automaker bailout and the stimulus package. Too bad we can’t change that killing Bin Laden thing, knowing what we know now.

  • hatsylady

    Great speech by a brilliant man. David is one of my favorites since he was on the other side and knows these people well. I don’t understand why people can’t see this. I hope and pray we won’t have a totalitarian one-party government. It’s not looking good.

  • MrUniteUs1

    “The most important battle in the world today is not being waged in the Middle East but here at home in the United States.” True, No one in the Middle is East stopping a million Americans from going back to work, cheering a goverrnment shutdown, threatening to cause the government to default unless they get “their way”. “Their way” changes every day.

  • yippeekayay

    This article ought to be on the front pages of all our most major papers. Or at least a leading Op-ed.

  • AussieBrit

    The problem with Rightists is that they seem to think that small govt and large unfettered markets will solve everything. Except we know that this is wrong. Look at the Scandinanvian countries. They have some of teh highest standards of living. They have high taxes and high wages. But EVERYONE can afford to go to good schools and universities, because they’re all FREE!!!
    The left inherently believe that individuals and libertarians searching for their own self benefit is more likley to inflict damage to society than a society searching for collective benefit will damage the individual. In fact it’s more than likely that a well functioning society will benefit individuals, where as individuals will work for their individual good, and not care for the good of society – and thus ultimately their own good. It’s the corner stone of The tradgedy of the commons.
    As for the current cohort of politicians across the world, the game is all about making the corporations happy. There is no right or left anymore. No ideology on either side of politics. Its all about trying to continue the neo-liberal notion of capitalism that is crumbling before their eyes.
    Rapant deregulation has allowed mulit-national companies ensalve third world workers in horrific conditions with outrageously low pay, all so a few shareholders can make money. And that is where the modern, western left wing came from – unionism. This is because of victorian lack of regulation allowed industialists to use humans as machines. The left is fundementally against the rich getting richer by trampling over the rights of the masses who provide the grunt.
    This article/speech is the biggest load of claptrap I’ve ever read. No wonder the USA is on the verge of plunging us all into an economic abyss with attitudes like these.

    • Dontazemebro

      “The left is fundementally against the rich getting richer by trampling over the rights of the masses who provide the grunt.” No, they are for a strong centralized government trampling over the rights of the people.

    • JoeMudd

      “No wonder the USA is on the verge of plunging us all into an economic abyss with attitudes like these.”

      Glad to see you admit that those free markets that WE built fueled the world and now you want to see us go communist. Of course you
      hate this article just like you hate an honest hard days work. It’s so
      much easier to SUCK off society than to build a business and reap
      the rewards. These ideals spring from our Declaration citing GOD
      as the giver of rights. That socialist/communist crap you spewed above
      is humanist tripe, with the state as the giver and changer of rights
      and it’s crap.

      • justquitnow

        Actually “God” only appears once in the declaration and it was specifically written as “Laws of Natures and of Nature’s God” for a reason. But you’re just another cultist getting his practice calling people commies and boiling everything back down to your binary principles. “Humanist tripe”…you don’t even know what the farquat you’re talking about, you’re just tacking on labels.

        BTW…our free markets would have collapsed and gone down the shitter without a ton of public, taxpayer, socialist money.

        • JoeMudd

          You make a very good example of EXACTLY what this
          article is about ya friggin communist. If by free markets
          you mean the crony BS that we’ve been living under for
          more than 200 years then by all means lets all work for the collective, comrade.
          God only needs to appear ONCE and that ONE time set
          the stage for the freest national endeavor ever proposed
          as God gives man his rights, NEVER other men or the
          collective. Unless God builds the house he who labors, labors in vain.
          PS I think Humanist Tripe fits rather well.

          • justquitnow

            You’re a lunatic.

      • AussieBrit

        My history isn’t great, but I’m pretty damn sure the Yanks didn’t invent capitalism.

        Govts have ALWAYS redistributed wealth via taxes. Good ol’ Bush et al redistributed wealth from the masses to corporations (mainly the ones his buddies ran). Free markets have NEVER existed. The nearest they came was in the Victorian era (1800’s). Then the British Empire was built on free trade, but even then taxes were paid that went to funding industrialists, which skew the markets.

        The British didn’t invade India, or colonise it, we bought it in a commercial trade. The East India Company was the entity that started our long involvement in India.

        I do an honest day’s work every day – not sure what you think you know of me, but please don’t make assumptions. I just live outside the USA, which gets the idea that a civilized society should provide for the poorest and most vulnerable. The option is that we pay the consequences, economically and societally, of having a large underclass with no hope or rights. These tend to screw things up by resorting to crime. This might be why Norway/Sweden have low crime rates. They actually provide decent welfare, so everyone can live a decent life.

  • http://itooktheredpill.wordpress.com/ Red Pill

    We are bringing Western civilization to its knees by selling private insurance plans on a web site where people pick and choose.”

    – Kathleen Sebelius, Health and Human Services Secretary

    What does that remind me of?

    But my journey is part of a larger journey- one shared by all who’ve ever sought to apply the values of their faith to our society. It’s a journey that takes us back to our nation’s founding, when none other than a UCC church inspired the Boston Tea Party and helped bring an Empire to its knees.

    – Barack Hussein Obama June 23, 2007

    Yes, it appears that Barack Obama and Kathleen Sebelius are “fellow travellers” on the journey to bring the “Empire” of Western civilization “to its knees”.

    • justquitnow

      FYI, your link goes to You Tube Repeater and you’re an idiot.

      • http://itooktheredpill.wordpress.com/ Red Pill

        FYI, I know the first link goes to YouTubeRepeater (that was an easy way to isolate Sebelius’ quote) and the second link goes to an archived version of Barack Obama’s 2007 speech (I had to use an archived version because it’s been scrubbed from his web site).

        If you ignore the fact that both Sebelius and Obama have spoken of bringing a nation or civilization “to its knees”, then you are an idiot.

        • justquitnow

          The “Empire” Obama is talking about there is the British Empire. You can’t be that stupid.

          • http://itooktheredpill.wordpress.com/ Red Pill

            The Boston Tea Party, the Declaration of Independence, and the American Revolution were about Liberty and Independence.

            They were never about bringing the British Empire to its knees. Our Founders sought independence from the British Empire, not to destroy it.

            It’s quite revealing how Obama views U.S. history, and that he went out of his way to say that his journey “is part of a larger journey- one shared by all who’ve ever sought to… bring an Empire to its knees.”

          • monodist

            They were never about bringing the British Empire to its knees

            Did you think the Revolution was something like a Tea Party rally, all red polyester pants and misspelled t-shirts?

          • BillyBob Bob

            No one says that of you.

      • BillyBob Bob

        And your mommy has always been ashamed of you and your daddy left which is why you’re a sissy.

    • DvoraChesed

      Thanks for the links. This should remove all doubt who and what the malodorous Ocommie administration is all about.
      The Reds so infest positons of power today they don’t even feel the need to hide anymore.

      • monodist

        The Reds so infest positons of power today they don’t even feel the need to hide anymore.

        Truer words you’ve never written.

    • ArizonaSun

      They will, very soon, all be in jail is they keep pissing everyone off. AND … it could all start in just a matter of hours!

      • monodist

        Is that still a law in Arizona? The ‘uppity’ statute is still on the books?

    • monodist

      Brilliant. Two thumbs up.

  • nomoretraitors

    I said it before and I’ll say it again: This “president” does not represent our interests, heritage or culture.
    And it is a testament to the stupidity of the American public that he was elected twice

    • vulgar_imposter

      Translation: I hate black people.

      • defcon 4

        Didn’t muhammad (PASBUH) keep black slaves? Didn’t muhammad call black people “raisin heads”? Was not muhammad a white man?

        • Tiff Bee

          Ahh his/her name is vulgar imposter so they are just trying to start a fight just dont feed the troll it will starve to death

        • Rosalee Adams

          Muslim sold and they continue to human traffick to this day.

      • RatedBestComment

        The only people I know that hate Negroes, are Negroes themselves.

        • Rosalee Adams

          self destructive……….nobody hates them as much as they hate themselves. I have seen it over and over again
          and YES I am fully aware that is is ALL MY FAULT since I am not black
          zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

          • monodist

            Nothing is your fault Rosalee.

        • monodist

          This makes sense. If you’re still call them Negroes, you probably know a boatload of them well enough to discern their inner self-hatred.

      • nomoretraitors

        Translation: I’m a stupid libtard who can’t think of an intelligent rebuttal so I play the race card instead

        • monodist

          Translation: I am unable to cure my idiocy through the echo chamber that is the Right.

      • BillyBob Bob

        Translation: I hate America.

        • monodist

          Translation: I got my GED later in life.

      • Sheikh Yer-Bouti

        OH NO….the racism card!
        Remember, we conservatives LOVE Alan West, Dr. Ben Carson and so many other black American patriots that your accusation rings hollow like so much of what you say.

        • monodist

          You left out Herman ‘The Hands’ Cain.

    • RatedBestComment

      It has been said that if election were honest no Demoncrap could ever get elected.

      And it has also been said if elections could really change things, it would be declared illegal!

      So there you have you answer!

      • ArizonaSun

        You mean like when Sheila Jackson Lee had over 2,900 of her voters living at the same address?

        • monodist

          We should figure out a way to make it harder for negroe democrats to vote…wait

    • glashoppah

      It is a testament to the how utterly effective the Left’s infiltration of our education system has been. They have destroyed it. Collectivism cannot take hold in a population that understands it.

  • Thinka Boudit

    You can watch YouTubes of Gore, Clinton and other key democrats assuring us in no uncertain terms that Saddam had WMD and was a threat that we had to deal with. More than once, they voted to do just that.
    Yet, a day came when the democrats chose to lie about all of this. They joined our enemies and said Bush made up the threat so that we could go to war… “to help his buddies get rich”.
    If the mainstream media were not just a branch of the democrat party, this deceitful, traitorous act never would have worked.

    • nulltransform

      I remember when Fahrenheit 9/11 came out. I believe that was a turning point.

      • justquitnow

        Yeah but that filmmaker is a Democrat, so it’s a lie and none of the information is valid.

        • nulltransform

          Of course. But it was an incredibly effective piece of propaganda.

          • monodist

            It affected millions of people like you, it was very effective.

    • justquitnow

      I guess if you were writing a children’s book from Cheney’s point of view, that all might sound reasonable. Were you not alive during the Bush Administration, or what? Like the events and facts only exist in the perception of critics…if it was negative it was democrat and therefore not true.

  • Chris Behme

    Thank you again David. You are without a doubt one of the most important thinkers in the country, and your writing has had a great influence on my worldview. Since leftism freely allows for all sorts of ghastly and dehumanizing acts (say, letting four people die, and then lying about it, or using the federal tax agency to harass political foes, and lying about it, etc,etc,etc.) progressives are, in my experience, a shifty, joyless and soulless lot.

    Leftists fear the truth. You tell the truth, and they greatly fear you for exposing their craven and utterly predictable behavior. Good people don’t expect other people to act like that. People want to believe the best about people. And people don’t want to entertain the idea that the telegenic black president the media love to love, is in reality a rotten conniving megalomaniacal narcissist who supports both communism and Islamism. But they’re finding out…

    Keep em coming, David! This one’s a print and keep! Keep fighting the good fight. America can be saved.

  • MLCBLOG

    Find your best way of reaching the most people and let’s get going. The trick is to educate and persuade effectively, alone or in groups. Just do it.

  • fanlad

    God Bless you David, and all other conservative freedom fighters.

    • defcon 4

      I’ll second that. G-d bless David Horowitz.

  • RatedBestComment

    The only thing I disagree with it is the part where he says they are “not delusional”.

    IMO they are very delusional! This is really between good and evil, for there seems to be no explanation to why the left is should behave the way they do.

    They HATE God for some reason. They hate everything about Him and they hate anyone who believes and follows him.

    Communism when it accepts some principles of capitalism thrive as we see in China and Russia. Many millionaires and billionaires have been created and there seems to be a rising middle class

    You would think that the left would be rejoicing that communism is able to lift itself out of poverty using a little American capitalism as proof of success. BUT NO, they still blame America for being evil on the world. For holding people back.

    So this is proof that it is not about communism vs capitalism as they claim, but just rather HATRED of America for all to see if they wanted to.

    The only thing I haven’t figured out yet is it because of our sins? God has always been known to reserve enemies for us when we go astray. Has he raised up liberals for this very purpose?

    That is the only explanation I can come up with because liberals are hypocrites, liars and full of hate. But the odd thing is they never see themselves that way. Hate is what drives them and make them very irrational, or dare I say “delusional”?

    • JoeMudd

      Yes He has given power to our enemies to thwart our path
      of selfish destruction. We cower before the “choice crowd”
      all the while propping up their right to destroy life for the
      pursuit of money, be it the clinic or the patient. We do all
      and everything based upon the “economics” of the matter,
      IE we worship money and not God. The list here is as long
      as Horowitz’s article.
      Until we go down on bended knees and return to Him we are
      doomed to destruction.
      Unless God builds the house he who labors, labors in vain.

    • Robert

      Communists, Socialists, Fascists, Progressives, other Marxists, and Islamists all hate Yahowah (God). Satan (meaning “The Adversary”) is opposed to Yahowah, and the sworn enemy of man, seeking to lord over, control, and enslave man through force and deception, and seeking to force man to bow down to him in submission. That is also the goal of Communists, Socialists, Fascists, Progressives, other Marxists, and Islamists. Their ambitions coincide with Satan’s ambitions because they are in league with The Adversary. And they have leagued with The Adversary in the pursuit of temporal power, money, and sex.

  • Kedzie

    Amen, brother.

  • David Michael

    Wow. Just wow. Never have I read or heard the differences between us explained so clearly, and yes, succinctly. This is certainly not a two paragraph subject. It is also based in what appears to be historical fact. I say appears to be because I haven’t done any fact checking of my own yet, and I learned long ago that just because someone says it is so, doesn’t make it so. Even as eminent a historian as Mr. Horowitz. It does though, definitely have the ring of truth. My quandary is this. I feel like it may already be too late. I’m afraid we may have to descend into the hell of a “progressive utopia” before enough people will truly come alive and become aware. This may simply be too complex a subject for a people who increasingly don’t know the reasons for WWII, let alone who fought who. The great majority of folks I know won’t have the attention span to read the whole speech. Well, I’ll do what I can to convince people to read it, I hope it helps, because something has to change…

  • ByeByeUSA AsWeKnowIt

    Holy mother of elvis that was an epic article.

    EPIC.

    • ArizonaSun

      Everything Horowitz does is phenomenal.

      • monodist

        With the possible exception of displaying a scintilla of intellectual honesty, I agree with you 100%.

  • crudcutter

    Bravo – a masterpiece. Now if we could only get some republicraps to read it.

    • glashoppah

      The division is not between Republicans and Democrats. That is a false dichotomy. The division is between tyranny and liberty. There are plenty who call themselves “Republicans” who are tyrants. Those same people will tell you a vote for a principled Conservative is a “wasted vote.”

  • glashoppah

    An absolutely excellent essay. I am often asked by deluded but essentially Conservative friends why I am so unyielding in my opposition to Collectivism and those around me who call themselves liberals. They think they can be friends with liberals and wonder why I am not. I tell them “you do not know a mortal, deadly enemy when you see one.”

  • Snuph

    I have been saying this for over 20 years. The GOP hasn’t heard me yet and I doubt they will listen to the expert either/

  • Keep Honkin I’m Reloading
  • cadcam

    Great article. Unfortunately, it will get a lot of “likes” and not much more. That is the problem.

  • michaelgingerly

    The problem today is within the Republican Party. Obama is taking advantage of the split between establishment and Tea Party factions. Presently there is no single leadership.

  • eamonkelly

    At their very core, progressives are misanthropes.

    • Charles Martel

      Agreed. I think it is more that they hate themselves, or see no worth in themselves. They project their misery onto the rest of the world like a rotating turd cannon.

      • monodist

        Again, the persistent conservative preoccupation with all things poo. Do they never cover Freud in voucher schools?

        • Charles Martel

          Freud was a worthless bolshevik. Jung was and is Psychology.

      • King_Putz

        Which brings to mind this story from an aptly named Mr. Cannon.

        Brilliant!

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HubbUwYWzKM

  • Kriemhild

    Remember Whittaker Chambers? He also as a young man was a dyed-in-the-wool gung-ho Communist and an official in the CPA. Then one day he watched his first born child sitting in her high chair, eating. “She was the most miraculous thing that had ever happened in my life. My eye came to rest on the delicate convolutons of her ear — those intricate, perfect ears. The thought passed through my mind — ‘No, those ears were not created by any chance coming together of atoms in nature (the Communist view). They could only have been created by an immense design.’ ” These thoughts were heresy to a Communist, and were the start of his conversion to Christianity. He knew the power and the vast infiltration of Communism in the USA, and he told his wife that in becoming Christians they were switching from the winning to the losing side. No pastor spoke to him, he had never read the Bible, but he was a saint, and intuitively understood sacramental religion, how the physical reveals the spiritual. He understood that the conservative leadership did not have the wisdom, courage, or desire to stand up against the evil which was seeking to convert the world to its own image. He saw little hope that Western leadership could, or would deal with the realities, that it had bought too far into a compronise-and-get-along mentality to stand up against Communism, mortal enemy of everything Western Civilzation stands for. He came to understand the deep nature of spiritual warfare. Chambers understood that without God, we have no hope against the enemy. Either Jesus is Lord, or civil government will be lord. Either God will rule, or we will be ruled by the Tower of Babel. We will be ruled by the Bible or by the bayonet.
    The whole Biblical spiritual life is built on and for freedom.The law itself is to produce a free, not a constricted, people. There will be no secure winning on the side of freedom, truth and righteousness if the Biblical worldview cannot be defended, and that rests on evidence for the existence of God.
    Ronald Reagan had read Chambers’ book “Witness” and he credited this book with providing his understanding of the philosophy and workings of the Communist mind. Every American should read this book, it is holy, written by a saint.

    • Sheikh Yer-Bouti

      “Witness” is truly one of the finest pieces of prose ever written in the English language and as a memoir it is even more powerful than Grant’s. I couldn’t put it down and recommend it to everyone who’ll listen.
      I agree that Chambers was a saint. His spiritual journey and the suffering he endured ennobled his humanity.

  • nulltransform

    I always wondered.. How do you distinguish a bona fide Communist vs a useful idiot vs a low information voter?

    • monodist

      Well, a communist and socialist would firstly live in a Red State where they have the most government jobs per capita. Secondly, they’d probably live in the Red States that practices socialism as the Red States traditionally soak up much more taxpayer money than they provide to the government (see Red State Income Redistribution).

      Your useful idiot would normally be a tea party member, like Ted ‘The Mountie’ Cruz. The people are useful in inflicting untreatable wounds on the once proud and representative Republican Party. The ‘useful idiot’ is usually found to be hampering his party’s electability or at Wednesday night ‘bible study’. It’s also helpful to look for the ‘useful’ by appearance, as they can normally be found wearing white t-shirts with faintly veiled racist slogans or some adolescent variation of the President’s name. Keep an eye out for an over 60 grandmother in red polyester pants and a white floppy tennis hat from the eighties.

      Low-info voters are easy to differentiate. They are the ones that vote for ‘useful idiots’ in the primaries, thus ensuring that the electable moderate conservatives never make it to the general where they might have beaten the Democrat. These low-info voters are Democratic Party favorites and it has become fashionable among many Democratic donors to give to their “useful idiot’ picks as they can so reliably be counted on to self-destruct in Washington if they are ever elected at all. (see Ted ‘The Mountie’ Cruz.)

      Wish you the best of luck in your endeavors to further stratify the already fractious Republican Party. Thank you SO much.

      • Lady_Penguin

        “moderate conservative” is an oxymoron. Republican party is obviously and currently controlled by progressives, who either can’t admit they’re as far to the Left as the Democrat party, or they’ve just been #undocumentedDemocrats all along.

        BTW, your remarks about Red States soaking up government money is particularly laughable. The urban cesspools soaking up government monies saturate the Blue states. Look at New Jersey, Michigan (Detroit), Los Angeles, etc.

        • justquitnow

          Does it really matter what states take what when you can be assured of yourself while not really knowing?

        • monodist

          “…moderate conservative” is an oxymoron

          The Republican party has always been conservative, just not as rabidly dogmatic as the party post Reagan when, seeing the demohgraphic handwriting on the wall, the party relinquished control to the religious right and their direct descendant, the Tea Party. Lincoln could never make it out of your primaries today. Today’s Republican party is to the party of Lincoln as prewar Germany was to postwar Germany. Same name, completely different meaning.

          “Red States soaking up government money is particularly laughable”

          Laugh all you like, but refute if you may:

          Red States Take More Money From Washington Than They Put In

          —http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jan/26/blog-posting/red-state-socialism-graphic-says-gop-leaning-state/

          Here ARE the Red States (feel free to FACTUALLY refute):

          • 11 of the 15 “federal welfare” states, those that get back more than $1.00 for every $1.00 they send to the federal government, are Red States; U.S. Census Bureau and Congressional Budget Office

          • 9 of the 10 states with the lowest percentages of college graduates are Red States; The Lumina Foundation for Education

          • 12 of the 15 states with the highest high school drop-out states are Red States; National Center for Education Statistics, and the 7 states with the highest high school drop-out rates are Red States; National Education Association

          • The 10 poorest states are Red States; Deseret News, Fox News

          • The 12 states with the highest rates of credit card debt relative to income are Red States; Equifax

          • The 10 “most religious” states are all Red States; Liberty University’s Christian Post

          • 9 of the 10 states with the highest percentage of sex crime offenders per capita are Red States; Criminalpages.com

          • 8 of the 10 states with the highest number of Internet porn subscribers are Red States; CNBC

          • 9 of the 10 states with the highest divorce rates are Red States; U.S. Census Bureau

          • 14 of the 15 states with the highest teen pregnancy rates are Red States; U.S. News and World Report

          • 12 out of the 15 states’ citizens with the worst overall health are Red States, including: 8 of the top 10 for diabetes, childhood poverty, cancer deaths, infant mortality, public assistance, and illegal drug abuse; United Health Foundation

          • 13 of the 15 states with the highest homicide-by-firearm rates are Red States; Statemaster.com

          • 11 of the 15 states with the highest rates of illiteracy are Red States; National Center for Education Statistics

          • 9 of the 10 states with the highest suicide rates are Red States; National Center for Health Statistics and Bureau of Census .

          Hmmmm. *crickets*

        • monodist

          “moderate conservative” is an oxymoron

          Republicans, traditionally the conservative party, were mostly moderates until, seeing the demographic handwriting on the wall, the party was given into the hands of the religious right and their contemporary descendants, the TP. Lincoln would never survive a Republican primary today. The party of Lincoln is to today’s Republican party as postwar Germany is to prewar Germany

          Red States soaking up government money is particularly laughable

          Red States Take More Money From Washington Than They Put In

          —http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jan/26/blog-posting/red-state-socialism-graphic-says-gop-leaning-state/

          Additionally:

          • 11 of the 15 “federal welfare” states, those that get back more than $1.00 for every $1.00 they send to the federal government, are Red States; U.S. Census Bureau and Congressional Budget Office

          • 9 of the 10 states with the lowest percentages of college graduates are Red States; The Lumina Foundation for Education

          • 12 of the 15 states with the highest high school drop-out states are Red States; National Center for Education Statistics, and the 7 states with the highest high school drop-out rates are Red States; National Education Association

          • The 10 poorest states are Red States; Deseret News, Fox News

          • The 12 states with the highest rates of credit card debt relative to income are Red States; Equifax

          Hmmmm… *crickets*

          • 1mrt1

            Cali and NY lead the way in Welfare payouts …hahaha

          • justquitnow

            And in number of people….hahaha…oh.

          • monodist

            HAHAHAHA – when you can’t refute the facts, laugh like you don’t care. No one wil notice. HAHAHA

          • monodist

            • 11 of the 15 “federal welfare” states, those that get back more than $1.00 for every $1.00 they send to the federal government, are Red States; U.S. Census Bureau and Congressional Budget Office

          • 1mrt1

            Like I said you cant beat Cali and NY…and your insult is stale. Try harder AZZhat

      • Robert

        And when “moderate Republicans” do get elected, we see a whole lot of them promptly vote right down the line with the Democrats. Don’t think we haven’t noticed.

    • firegeorge

      Don’t listen to monodist. He’s a liberal and misinforms people.

      • monodist

        No, by all means listen to FG whose only known approach to civililized debate is the word ‘libt*rd’ and a world view seemingly built upon an un-natural facination with her own ‘p**p’. Her very own brand of backwards looking *tee-hee*, post elimination depression.

    • prstewart

      By their place in line.

  • dereid49

    OBAMA DIDN’T GIVE US OBAMACARE…IT WAS SHOVED DOWN THE AMERICAN PEOPLE’S THROAT BY THE SOLE DEMOCRAT PARTY…BY ‘BACK ROOM DEALINGS’ AND ‘PROMISES, LIES, CHEATING AND BACK STABBING’ BY NANCY PELOSI

    OBAMACARE WAS NEVER VOTED ON BY A SINGLE REPUBLICAN…!!!.
    DEMOCRATS OWN OBAMACARE
    IT IS A TAX AS JUDGE ROBERTS DECLARED IT…BARRY LIED AND TOLD AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT IT WAS NOT A TAX…IT IS THE LARGEST TAX EVER TO BE IMPOSE ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE… THAT IF YOU DO NOT BUY INSURANCE YOU MUST PAY A FINE…OBAMACARE IS RUN BY THE IRS…
    THE SOLE TAX COLLECTOR OF THE USA…
    ANYONE NOT PAYING THE FINE…
    WILL BE SUBJECTED TO THE IRS TO COLLECT THE FINE…
    ANYWAY THAT THE IRS CHOOSES..
    70 % of AMERICANS DO NOT WANT OBAMACARE!

    • monodist

      Democracy sure sucks when you lose, doesn’t it?

      • justquitnow

        But 70%…some poll….but Hannity said…but it’s evil!

        • monodist

          … death panel…Grandma…Nazi’s…marxist!

      • firegeorge

        As usual, you’re missing the point.

        • monodist

          Right, the above boldcap rant was in no way the mark of a sore loser. Gotcha.

    • firegeorge

      Well said.

  • Kriemhild

    There is also the story of another fierce Communist and member of the Black Panthers and NOI, (Nation of Islam), Eldridge Cleaver. He wrote a best-selling book, “Soul on Ice”, in which he described his metamorphosis from rapist and drug-dealer to Malcilm X apostle to Marxist revolutionary who became one of the leading exponents of black liberation in America, and famous worldwide. He became involved in the shooting of a Los Angeles policeman and had to flee the country. He first went to the Communist country of Algeria, then he visited North Vietnam and North Korea, and of course Russia. Everywhere he was wined and dined. But he also noticed that the Leaders were rich and lived luxuriously while the people were poor and hungry, and afraid to say a word. They were virtually slaves. He became disullusioned with Communism, in practice it was not what he thought it would be. One night in Paris, in a deep depression because of discovering the truth about Communism and that what he had always believed in was a lie, he held a gun to his head. As he was building up courage to pull the trigger, he looked up at the moon and saw “….. a profile of myself …..as I stared at this image, it changed, and I saw my former heroes paraded before my eyes —- Fidel castro, Mao Tse Tung, Karl Marx, Frederick Engels, passiing in review …. each appearing for a moment of time, and then dropping out of sight, like fallen heroes. Finally at the end of the procession, in dazzling, shimmering light, the image of Jesus Christ appeared”. Cleaver, trembling and sobbing, fell to his knees and asked for forgiveness, repeated the Lord’s Prayer and the 23rd Psalm that he had learned as a child from his grandfather. Finally, exhausted, he fell asleep. When he awoke in the morning, he saw a white light shining back towards America through a prison cell. He called the FBI and said he wanted to come home, and he was willng to pay whatever price the law would put upon him for his crimes. Two FBI agents, one black and one white, came to Paris and escorted him to New York. From there, he was sent back to a prison in California where he made friends with some Christians and became a born-again Christian. He wrote another book called “Soul on Fire” about his redeeming experiences. For more details to this extaordinary story, look it up yourself.

    • Sheikh Yer-Bouti

      Great post, thanks.

    • monodist

      I get it. He’s black too so they must be like the same people, right? Sterling logic, worthy of ‘Pravda’ Horowitz himself.

      • Lady_Penguin

        Aren’t you filled with the nasty this morning? A commenter shares information (true about Cleaver’s change of heart), and you felt this need to belittle it. Says more about you, than anything else.

        • monodist

          Aren’t you filled with righteous indignation this morning?

          Am I not entitled to a differing opinion on this site?

          You react to irrelevancy in your way LP and I will react in mine. Furthermore, the lack of any paragraphs might lead one to believe that the said “sharing” might possibly been a mere cut and paste.

          • JoeMudd

            please post your address and phone # and see
            just what your entitled to.

          • monodist

            Well, Jethro you’ve got me nervous now…wow, how did it come to this? yikes…

          • JoeMudd

            I so wish for civil war

          • monodist

            Just for the heck of it, pick the blue uniforms this time around. maybe things’ll turn out differently for you.

          • monodist

            Just for the heck of it, pick the blue uniforms this time around. maybe things’ll turn out differently for you.

  • Kriemhild

    Karl Marx was, according to Richard Wurmbrand the Romanian Christian martyr, a Satanist who didn’t give a damn about the Proletariat, this was only a ploy to get a lot of people to follow him so he could get power over them, which was all he really wanted.

  • Gordon Gordinsky

    Horowitz does an excellent job of lying while appearing to be baring the truth.

    Good work.

    • monodist

      In addition, his supernatural ability to see far into the future the precise outcome of enacting any policy he disagrees with remains unquestioned. His is a shamans wisdom.

      • firegeorge

        The trolls seem to be out in full force here on this site. They never disappoint. They continue to be misguided individuals who never want to see the truth and deny what is before their very eyes. That’s why we will never reverse course in the this country and undo do the damage that has been done by this evil man in the WH.

        • dereid49

          VERY GOOD …

        • JoeMudd

          Civil war will undo them.

    • dereid49

      LYING LIKE BARRY 0BAMA DOES AND SAYS TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE… AND INTO THE FUTURE…THE OUTCOME IS A CHANGED AMERICA…SOCIALIST AMERICA…CONTROLLED BY THE VERY OWN FEDERAL GOV’T…GIVE ME CONTROL OF THE MONEY AND I WILL CONTROL THE PEOPLE…

    • common_sence

      Mr. Gordinsky,

      Mr. Horowitz identifies the lies of democrats and progressives with examples. You sir, on the other hand just make a statement and expect anyone who reads your words to agree with you.

      Rather than make a statement, I would challenge you sir to cite evidence (if you have any) of Mr. Horowitz’s lies to make your argument

      To quote Henry Readon (Atlas Shrugged-Ayn Rand) when defending his metal to the State Science Institute “He states, if you have any evidence that Reardon Metal is a danger or a threat to the public safety then present it, or else we’re done”

      I challenge you to do the same. Cite Mr. Horowitz’s lies, or I’m done listening to you as I hope others will be as well.

      • justquitnow

        “There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old’s life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.“ — Unknown

        • monodist
          • Adamon

            Generally, all Wiki articles that deal with politics are garbage, soaked thru with lefty bias.

          • monodist

            Might want to read it, at least the subject, before you embarrass yourself any further, dolt//

  • Jack Levin

    …insane Israeli = David Horowitz, who wants WAR against Arabs to be paid for by American blood and money. They buy #GOP with few bucks, brainwash the rest. Promote HATE, distrust against Americans, and our, Leaders…. So Israel, or Israelis living in US can control USA.

    • prstewart

      Better Israelis than murderous Islamist extremists.

  • dereid49

    SCAMMERS ARE NOW TAKING CONTROL OF THE SIGN UPS FOR BARRYCARE…BE FOREWARNED, BE SURE YOU ARE ON A SECURE WEBSITE BEFORE GIVING YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION…

    • veritaseequitas

      Better yet. Don’t sign up.

      • monodist

        Just rely on the rest of the country to pick up the tab in the Red State Emergency Room Healthcare Plan.

        • veritaseequitas

          Your stupid is showing.
          There are plenty of ways to lower health insurance costs besides the government getting involved and costing the taxpayers billions of dollars.
          As an example: Social Security, Medicare and soon Medicaid are going broke, despite billions of taxpayer dollars being poured into those programs.
          Does it not point out the utter fruitlessness of allowing the government ANOTHER program to run?
          ObamaCrap is just a sop to Obama’s monumental lust for power and a legacy, and the left’s mission to totally destroy America.
          Wake up.

          • justquitnow

            Your like this other guy….you’ve been calling the law “Obamacare” for so long you completely forgot that it is not a healthcare plan. It expands Medicare (not in Republican states…they didn’t want the money…they have the poor and some of the worst problems, but expanding Medicaid was a bridge too far….assholes. So if it helps, start calling it the ACA…so you understand it as the framework it is…

            You guys smear and snark so much that you believe your own snark and forget all these words are suppose to mean things. If you’re concerned about Medicare going broke then you should be praising the ACA and the structure improvements.

  • veritaseequitas

    Excellent essay. He is wrong however about the most important battle being waged here in America rather than the Middle East. Bible prophecy clearly states that the final battle will be waged in the Middle East with Russia, Iran, China and Israel as the major players.
    There is no indication that America plays any part in this however. I believe it is b/c we will have ceased to be a major influence in the world. Due of course, to the machinations of the left and their “progressive” policies, which call for the complete destruction of America as a world power.
    The administration of Barack Obama has speeded up the process of eroding America and her values, like no other administration has before. He is the consummate liar and cheat. Who will follow him once his dictatorship is over?
    I remember Nikita Kruschev banging his shoe on the podium during a UN speech decades ago, saying “we will bury you,” referring to the USA. It is coming to pass.
    The Lord is in charge however, so if you are right with Him, all will be well.

    • firegeorge

      God has been and always will be in control.

      • monodist

        Great to know he is on President Obama’s side in the ACA debate then.

        • Robert

          Actually, Yahowah is pretty certain to judge Obama to have leagued with The Adversary, and let his soul spend eternity with the dark spirit he chooses to serve. The best he can hope for is that Yahowah will mercifully annihilate his soul and have it cease to exist, rather than condemn him to enduring everlasting anguish.

          • monodist

            No man, including you, can claim to know God’s mind and rightfully call himself a Christian.

    • Robert

      Actually, America probably ceases to be a player in an apparent global nuclear war, as the Magog Federation (all of dar al Islam) attack on Israel spreads from nation to nation to nation to nation, with “pillars and columns of fire and smoke” and “hail mixed with blood”, both descriptive of effects of nuclear war. Had the prophet Yahowchanan (a.k.a. “John”) included “clouds shaped like a mushroom” in what he scribed in Revelation, I think we would all recognize the significance of those words. That apparently occurs about a year or so into The Tribulation, running from 2026 to 2033. Armageddon then occurs in 2033. I’ll say this – those who like Obama will LOVE The Antichrist.

  • GeneralQuarters

    Bravo and with marching orders! The mask is off from the left!

  • Gordon Gordinsky

    This is an exchange from another forum. It is a little less civil than I’d like, but it is interesting.

    Poster 3: Horowitz NAILED Hillary and Huma who is Muslim Brotherhood all the way. Great piece!!!!!!!!

    Poster 4: “It takes a real special kind of dumb**ck to actually believe the wife of
    Anthony Weiner is a pro-Islamic Muslim Brotherhood operative. Far right conservatives are very unfortunate people with a level of stupidity that is absolutely baffling.”

  • Looking4Sanity

    Why would anyone in their right mind volunteer to serve in our Armed Forces under these conditions?

    More importantly…how can we trust anyone who serves under this administration to do the right thing? They have already demonstrated a total lack of judgment and of morality.

    Believe me when I say that our military will not hesitate to slaughter their own countrymen the very second they are given the unlawful order to do so.

    • http://obbop.wordpress.com/ obbop

      One reason to support Oath Keepers. Created by ex-military and law enforcement folks aware of the possible threat of the entrenched power structures curtailing We, the People with the awesome military and police forces at their command.

      http://oathkeepers.org/oath/

      • Looking4Sanity

        I’m well aware of the organization. How, exactly, do you suggest I “support” them?

        • http://obbop.wordpress.com/ obbop

          In whatever manner you deem suitable to yourself.

  • Texas Jack

    Excellent Article…

  • http://obbop.wordpress.com/ obbop

    Only a full-scale military coup can save the USA. This I truly believe but can not place the hundreds of written pages to explain in this tiny post.

    Also, the monolithic corporations must be altered to serve people rather then the masses of We, the People, forced to serve the corporations.

    Revolutionary War Two is needed but I fear the immense power of the entrenched elite class, corporations and their army of cohorts, minions and lackeys will stop that needed revolt with ease… unless a cohort of patriotic military officers cast off enough of the indoctrination all of us have been and continue to be immersed within and plan properly and commence the coup I am convinced the Founders would support.

    • monodist

      Where do you think we live, my friend, Egypt? Before resorting to this BS exhortation to commit treason, please show that you have done everything possible to gain a majority in the government. You sad, sorry faux patriots are nothing more than a losing ideology coupled with an incomplete ideation of the values of our country, a flawed knowledge of the constitution and a fetishistic misunderstanding of the second amendment.

      Wish as you might, in your fondest opium dreams, of a military coup, but know that John Brown has tread this ground before you and realized only too late that what he mistook for a principled revolution was seen by the vast majority as merely a self-appointed and addled attempt at self-aggrandizement.

      • http://obbop.wordpress.com/ obbop

        I guesstimate you would have been a dedicated Tory in a prior insurrection much lauded by those that won that rebellion.

        I detect within your writings the life-long indoctrination at work promulgated by the finest propaganda systems ever developed.

        I would rather be labeled a traitor than be a bleating citizen-sheep so adored by its masters. Your betters appreciate your servility.

        • monodist

          Your ability to cynically rewrite American history to suit your misguided rhetoric is indeed impressive.

          What you mistakenly see as your position on Breed’s Hill is actually nothing more valorous the view from inside Fort Sumter. Pick the blue uniforms this time, it may change your luck.

          • http://obbop.wordpress.com/ obbop

            In my not-so-humble opinion you are merely spewing that which has been implanted within you by the finest propaganda systems ever devised.

            Your elite class masters are proud of you.

            Your mental slave chains are stronger than steel.

          • monodist

            Yawwwwwn…Wake me for the revolution.

  • No RNC

    DH should have made more attention to the historic American Citizen and broken completely from the toxic left!

  • kevinstroup

    One of your better writings, Mr. Horowitz. I am glad that someone as widely read as you can eloquently state what so many conservatives are clueless about. My brother and I have been discussing the topics you have for the last 15 years, but we are considered cranks by the rest of the family. Oh well, time will tell.

  • Jack Hoxie

    What I would like to hear about more than what is wrong with Obama and the democrats is: What is the conservative plan moving forward? I feel the debate on both sides needs to move from a negative, what the other side has wrong, to a positive, this is what we want to do and how we will accomplish it standpoint.

    • Doran

      First, you have to define what you mean by “moving forward” Jack.. …because that has been a communist/progressive slogan for many decades.. I am not in favor of the radical transformation President Obama is so fond of taking about.

    • dusel1

      No slap on the wrist or hat-in-hand here. The Conservative plan should be to acknowledge that the usurper Obama, the traitorous legislative branch, and the unSupreme Court have all undermined Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the US Constitution, then arrest the White Hut criminal, try him, find him guilty of treason, then execute him. Next, arrest his enablers. Restore the US Constitution and law and order to the former USA.

      • monodist

        Uh… I think he meant a little bit further out, after all the killin’ and jailin’ and executin’ and stuff. You know, like describe what the country looks like after the erm…Revolution…

  • kmkatt

    What has happened the civil, intellectual discourse? You can not change and influence the other side by throwing these childish insults. Alinsky would be proud of this behavior, following his 12. It is a sorry happening, when our own freedoms are ridiculed by immature playground tactics. Keep the pressure up, we can turn the 12 against them. But, only in a quiet, adult voice way.

    • dusel1

      And I suppose you take brass knuckles to a gun fight, too.

      • kmkatt

        No, the big guns! I don’t believe in corporal punishment on children.

  • ISawTomorrow

    Good read.

  • TheOleTeaBag

    Wonderful article! I wish the Conservative Republicans would wise up and start learning how to articulate their position as Horowitz details above, otherwise, the LYING Democrats will continue destroying our economy, our country and our freedoms, while gathering more and more political power.

  • dusel1

    All contributors to this post: Forward a copy of the article to your traitorous US Representative and your two lying US Senators; otherwise, everyone is whizzing in the wind. I certainly will forward this article to the above mentioned asswipes.

  • disqus_aO4KJtxZtF

    For another story about someone working their way uphill to the truth, you may want to read this: A WINTER OF WORDS: “The best book ever written about…the failure of faculty unions.”
    http://www.lulu.com/shop/robert-klein-engler/a-winter-of-words/paperback/product-20129486.html

  • dusel1

    Revolutionary War: An awakening1.
    Civil War: USA nightmare1.
    Obama: USA nightmare2.
    Obama tried and executed: An awakening2.

    • monodist

      Tell the truth now, you work in Hollywood, right?

      • dusel1

        No. I just shoot straight.

        • monodist

          I thought that, what with those catchy titles and all…never mind.

  • http://www.anarchocapitalism.us/ Ethan Glover

    A little heavy on the just as bad conservative thoughts but still a very powerful speech. I’m impressed.

  • Gillian Callister

    Given his background, obama is not a progressive liberal. He’s a muslim. The koran allows muslims to deceive in order to conquer a land. Barak Hussein Obama is, as his name indicates, a muslim. His father, a muslim from Kenya. His stepfather, an indonesian muslim. Indonesia has the largest muslim population in the world. He was brought up since birth in two muslim-dominated countries. He has strong ties with both. His father’s family live in Kenya, the USA and some in England, where they enjoy the benefits of English largesse…This man is truly a wolf in sheep’s clothing…Be worried America. Be VERY worried

  • northierthanthou.com

    Utter tripe!

  • paddymanning

    Brilliant, searing but badly flawed. Right on the left and Obama, blind to the utter stupid waste of the Iraq War. War with Iran post Iraq? Crazy neocon.

  • Beebee

    I stopped reading at “Horowitz” , LOL

    • Ben Ghazi Butcher
    • John West

      LOL? really? are you 12 years old or what? You are the perfect recruit for Obamas civilian force … you are stupid enough to kill your own if told to.

    • June Clinkenbeard

      You are proud of the fact you are close minded and uninformed? Another sheep to lead all the way to the slaughter. Wake up!

  • robotnik

    Best piece I’ve read in years!

  • B Jenkum

    Thank you David, you are appreciated.

  • Ginger Rogers7

    What goes unsaid here is that BO is the puppet of the Clinton Global Initiative
    AND
    the Clintons are the highest ranking Americans in The Illuminati.

    BO was manufactured by The Illuminati
    BECAUSE
    the US was not sufficiently brainwashed in 2008 to elect Hillary Clinton.

    Q: Who are The Illuminati?
    A: They are the highest ranking satanworshippers & witches in the world.

    It only makes sense that
    The Illuminati and the Muslims would form a global coalition.
    Q: Why?
    A: Because both grps hate the God of the Bible
    WHICH
    filters down to hating Christians and Jews.

  • Timothy Vds

    Nice manifesto. Looks like David Horowitz and Ted Kaczynski are cut from the same cloth.

    • John West

      You are confused. You must be really stupid if you think those two individuals are similar. DH said the left was delusional, but not stupid. I disagree, the left is stupid. If they were smart they would know that their goals will destroy them as well as the rest of us.

    • June Clinkenbeard

      Ooh look! A Tip O’Neill fan crawled out of the woodwork to drop a pithy little turd of nonsense. You are a sheep. Go on back to your ivy covered pasture.

  • Jim

    The only Conservative TV is Fox and it is successfully Demonized by the Progressives. Most in America watch CNN because they naively think it is down the middle trustworthy. Everyday hard working Americans that are forced to work two jobs do not have the time to search multiple media outlets to find a shred of truth. It’s like they are slaves and they don’t even know it. I can see why Fox is gun-shy, because if they reported this column, CNN would bastardize them even more than they have been in the past. Americans are so in the dark about this, they would not believe this if it slapped them in the face. It’ getting worse by the day.

    • 123z

      What are we in the dark about that no one will tell us? In my efforts to find a shred of truth, I regularly watch BBC news and read the Canadian papers, but they also leave me in the dark. For God’s sake, tell us what is going on that no one is talking about.

      • runsinquicksand

        Hopeless.

    • melloe

      Fox propaganda machine with lies they went to court to tell, misinformation, dis-information,. carped statements, edited videos, and some people say at 0900 beings “news” at 2100 run by a foreigner who hates the US and a Saudi prince is one of the worst for facts. But since Reagen changed the FCC rules and regulations the 50 plus media have almost all been gobbled up by 5 or 6 rich dudes or corporate entities, and are going to spout the corporate line and “entertainment”.. actual news is far a fine between if it hurts the individual corporate. Anyone who listens to one media source exclusively has no idea what is actually going on. A good example, MSNBC will give more actual factual data, but only if it don’t hurt the corporate master. Have you ever heard them knock the Oil Companies as an example. Not that Fox is very good with facts or lies when it comes to Oil companies either.

    • Ray Williams

      Have you seen the ratings lately?

  • AZ BOB

    Talk Talk Talk Good opinions but what does an individual do. How do you reach the Masses of Conservatives and independents. We need solutions.

  • Ilya Shambat

    OK, this is something I know something about. First of all, the progressives are not dishonest; the ones I’ve known were the most honest people out there, whereas Republican leaders, tele-evangelists and radio talk show hosts are completely dishonest. Secondly, while some people disregard the past, the better ones not only learn from the past of the Western civilization but also from the pasts of other places, such as the pre-Columbians and the Chinese. Also, character assassination is something we see much more on the Right than we see on the Left – what came the way of Clinton for one was obscene, and he was an effective president. As for regarding oneself the citizen of the world, given the economic integration of the world it’s a necessity: What happens in say China affects what happens in America, and the more people can deal with other countries the more they can benefit America. I do not know who this person is, but he is about as credible as the US soldier who defected to North Korea during the Korean war. Defections on either side are not new, and that someone has defected does not make him right.

    • Ben Ghazi Butcher

      Masterful job of showing how correct Horowitz is about the dishonesty of regressives. Thanks.

    • John West

      You are very confused. I understand that. It’s the information sources you have been abused by.

    • June Clinkenbeard

      You started with a ridiculous and sweeping generalization that is patently false and it just devolves from there. I can give you voluminous examples of just how wrong you are but I know it would be a waste of my time. There are none so blind as those who will not see.

  • Ilya Shambat

    OK, this is something I know something about. First of all, the progressives are not dishonest; the ones I’ve known were the most honest people out there, whereas Republican leaders, tele-evangelists and radio talk show hosts are completely dishonest. Secondly, while some people disregard the past, the better ones not only learn from the past of the Western civilization but also from the pasts of other places, such as the pre-Columbians and the Chinese. Also, character assassination is something we see much more on the Right than we see on the Left – what came the way of Clinton for one was obscene, and he was an effective president. As for regarding oneself the citizen of the world, given the economic integration of the world it’s a necessity: What happens in say China affects what happens in America, and the more people can deal with other countries the more they can benefit America. I do not know who this person is, but he is about as credible as the US soldier who defected to North Korea during the Korean war. Defections on either side are not new, and that someone has defected does not make him right.

    • prstewart

      Dealing with other countries effectively is an absolute necessity today. Losing our national identity, with all it’s myriad cultures, is an absolute & deadly mistake.

  • mtp

    http://www.alt-market.com/articles/1768-report-security-breakdown-in-americas-nuclear-command-centers
    No doubt.
    Just think what these psychopaths could accomplish with a nuke if this account is accurate.

    Follow the links, draw your own conclusions.

    Sure makes a fellow think what a determined group of psychopaths could accomplish with a device of such destructive power…

    The US military does not loose those things. PERIOD. They fall by mistake from aircraft, sink with naval vessels, and other events of omission and mishap.. Those weapons do not just up and disappear. Just like the incredibly ingenious strong and weak fail safe systems built into them, so too are the checks and balance system built around their storage and handling.
    No, the only way they suddenly get lost is through a complex series of acts of commission.
    And Only through the national command structure, with authority of the commander in chief can those devices be removed from the systems in place to assure control of them to begin with.
    For a device to go up missing in this system is in and of itself all the reason to suspect something diabolical is afoot. What other reasoning or logic is there for a nuclear weapon to disappear from the inventory.
    I’m saying if it is intended for proper purposes there is no need to hide it’s destination. If anything it’s destination is what the entire purpose of traceability is centered on.

    Another alarming aspect of this is the design of most of the more modern upgrades in later Mark types in current inventory. They are literally dial a bombs. They can be set to yield from a fraction of a kiloton to megaton range. A very handy feature indeed the ability to control the destructive effects of use of this device to effect the results in how and why it could be used for nefarious reasons.

    Think about what a high altitude air burst would do as in an electro-magnetic pulse
    Poof good by everything from the underground media to EBT.
    upwards of 300 million people without electricity. Most of the devices of our civilization damaged beyond repair. Food, medicine, water, energy supplies, poof!
    Gone in a blink of the eye.
    Obama’s pal Ole Billyboy Ayers and their ilk gets the wish within a week or so of that magical die-off of the population of 25 million in order to destroy this great nation.
    What better method is there I ask?
    That device is crisis as a means personified.
    It is the perfect answer to a tyrants limitations.
    Is there a false flag event more suited for a usurper “POTUS” to declare Marshal Law?
    Signs of coming Marshal law are everywhere.
    Ain’t there a huge dry run exercise involving Mexico/US/Canadian civil and private authorities in regards to a massive grid down failure in Nov?

    This is some very very serious stuff my friend.

    Interestingly American Thinker posted a piece on Marshal Law this mourning.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/10/is_obama_creating_a_martial-law-ready_military.html

    I have no doubt if this story is accurate, the megalomaniacs running things will use that device somewhere.
    Look at the trespasses of rule of law, the scale of socio/economic suffering they have purposefully created, and the blood on their hands.
    This a logical next step for these animals.

    There are some really seriously sick crazy people at work here.

  • 123z

    You speak of ‘the biggest scandal in the hixtory of our country’ and ‘this fraudulent criminal activity’, but you do not say what the scandal or the fraudulent activity is. Can’t you tell us what it is?

    • runsinquicksand

      Kidding right?

      • Mark

        Oh REALLY? If Benghazi had happened under either Reagan, Bush 1, or Bush II, can you imagine the Stink the Democrats (or is it Democraps) would have raised? They’d still be obsessed with it, even if it had happened decades ago.

        Yes, the problem is that something was being done that shouldn’t have been. But Ambassador Stevens didn’t bargain for being murdered as part of representing the United States in Libya.

        O and his cronies have been covering the truth to protect their collective @sses.

        The problem for them, is that today, government F ups can’t be covered up as in the past. Instant communication, whether by Facebook, Twitter, and other social media renders old fashioned coverups irrelevant .

        Add to that the fact that events were seen in real time by the CIA, and the Libyan President immediately stated that the “event” was a Terrorist Attack, coupled with the continued denials of this By the Campaigner/Liar in Chief and his administration only increased our distrust of them.

        And because the terrorist won this battle, with deliberate help from Barack, Madame Hillary, and numerous other officials, the fact remains that Chris Stevens and his Marine guards were brutally murdered.

        That none on the left can see this is what makes their reasoning truly SICK!

    • sendtheclunkerbacktochicago

      We have a President that has been using fraudulent documents, a fraudulent SS# (042-68-4425) flagged by E-Verify several times; a fraudulent registration with the Selective Service in 2008; a forged birth document he offered as a “long form birth certificate” on April 27th, 2011. That all adds up to a SCANDAL if it helped him hide his true identity. Connecting dots is what investigators are suppose to do, right. Why isn’t anyone connecting the dots (fraudulent documents)?

      • 123z

        How was the social security number flagged? When someonw else was using it? How do you know about it? How was his registration with the Selective service fraudulent? Did he use someone else’s name? We have been through the birth certificate business time and time again and you people have always failed to prove anything is wrong with it Now you are raving about a “long form”: birth certificate, but a few years ago you were raving because he could not produce a long form birth certificate. You must know his true identity, if you know he is hiding it. What IS his true identity? The real SCANDAL is the hatred that is consuming you and your fellow Obama haters. With such venomous hatred burning in your heart, it will probably destroy you. And you are outraged when anyone suggests racism has anything to do with it. Who do you think you are kidding?

        • sendtheclunkerbacktochicago

          RACISM – This Fraud in Chief is 50% White and 43.25% Arab (thus all the Arab names on his SUPPOSED Daddy’s side incuding his own damn name), does that make me a White racist or an Arab racist or a 6.75% African-Negro racist. Can fix stupid (LMAO).

          Now for the rest of the crap you wrote. Obama SS# is well known (042-68-4425). It was FLAGGED several times by E-Verify. Isn’t that site in place to find fraudulent SS#s. Can’t fix stupid.

          Here are some of the details about the fraudulent Selective Service Registration. Even stupid folks can see that there is something very fishy about that registration. Obama more than likely registered as an Indonesian citizen at Occidental College and refused to register with the Selective Service using that Indonesian citizenship as an excuse not to register in 1980. See details below. Even you may see the light of deception on display.

          http://www.debbieschlussel.com/4428/exclusive-did-next-commander-in-chief-falsify-selective-service-registration-never-actually-register-obamas-draft-registration-raises-serious-questions/

          • 123z

            You are trying to say that you cannot be called a racist because you don’t now what race Obama belongs to. OK, then you can’t be called a racist.

            I’m glad Obama’s ss number is well known. I never knew that before you said it. How did you happen to get it?. . Somebody gave you a ss number and you put it through E-verify which said it wa fraudulent. So that means Obama has a fraudulent ss number. OK I have no way of proving that it is NOT Obama’s number any more than you have a way of proving that it IS his.. I don’t know what you mean when you say “Can’t fix stupid”. Do you know what you mean?

            I read the whole long thing on Obama’s selective service registration and I can’t say that I understand it. From the outset, the tone of the whole thing is “out to get” Obama so it is obviously not fair and objective. The woman who wrote it is said to rival Anne Coulter.

            I think your senseless phrase “Can’t fix stupid” best sums up the whole issue.

          • sendtheclunkerbacktochicago

            I do know what Obama’s (Barry Soetoro) ethnic background is, it is a damn shame that many Americans have fallen for the HOAX that he is our “first black” President. He is indeed 50% White, 43.25% Arab (thus all those Arab names on his SUPPOSED Daddy’s side and his own name) and 6.75% African-Negro. Only in a world of brain dead low information voters does that compute to “first black” President. It would be more logically correct to declare him our “first White/Arab” President. Stop walking around believing everything the media feeds you. If what I am showing folks here is true, does that not prove this person we call Barack Hussein Obama (Barry Soetoro) a FRAUD. There is NO evidence to be found where Barack Hussein Obama changed his name from Barry Soetoro to Barack Hussein Obama. He even signed his name Barry Obama which adds to the confusion. He lied on his application for the Illinois Bar when asked if he had any aliases and was disbarred for doing so. Are you enjoying this update?

          • 123z

            In this country there is virtually no such thing as a 100% black person. However is is our custom to call them black. You arer simply lying to say that Obama iis some 40% Arab. Where did you get that story?. jHis father may have been a Moslem but that in no way whatever means he was an Arab. The country with the largest Moslem population is Indonesia and no one but an idiot like you thinks they are Arab. It is not necessary to be an Arab to be a Moslem. Even you can be a Moslem..

            Obama’s legal name when his mother married in Indonesian and they lived in Indonesia was Sotero. He did not change his name. This was the name given to him in Indonesia by the Indonesian authorities. There is no fraud involved. He wsas not disbarred in Illinois. This is an internet legend started by his enemies.. He dropped his license to practice law in Ilinois because he is not practicing law there. So did his wife. .Both of them are in good standing with respect to the bar in Illinois and may resume practicing law whenever they wish. You could have looked this up as easily as I did but because of the evil and venom in your heart, you prefer to spread false rumors, Shame on you!

          • sendtheclunkerbacktochicago

            We don’t deal with customs, we deal with facts. Obama is 43.25% Arab (that does not mean they are Muslims, they may be Christians – has nothing to do with religion, you made it a religious issue). Do the damn math, can’t fix stupid. My son-in-law is ten shades darker than Obama and he is a Dominican. If he were the first dark skinned person to become President would have been considered our “first black President” or our “first Dominican President.” I think the Dominicans would be first in line to crucify the media for attempting to call him the ‘first black President.” While in Southeast Asia for 30 months there were all shades of skin color but they all bled red American blood.

            The name Soetoro was his step father’s name, it wasn’t given to him by the Indonesian government but by his step father with his mother’s approval. Your right there is “no fraud” in that. In order to change your name in America you have to do it legally in the courts, not just do it any time you damn well please. Do you know of any record of his name being changed (Barry Obama is a name change from Barry Soetoro – Barack Hussein Obama is a name change from Barry Soetoro).

            Obama was disbarred no matter what spin you put on it, that has been well researched and well documented. The media just don’t want to be bothered with it because it doesn’t affect the present day mess. Bill Clinton was disbarred and no one gave a crap. It is a symptom of how corrupt our politicians have become.

            The true evil exists in your heart, I am only interested in TRANSPARENCY that was PROMISED by your hero Barack Hussein Obama. How is that hope and change working for you.

          • 123z

            If Obama’s mother remarried and both she and her son took the husband’s name, maybe that is the custom in Indonesia. Why do you think a foreign country should have to comply with American law and do it in the courts. Are you crazy? Foreign countries do not have to comply with United States law. If Obama’s being disbarred was the subject of so much research and is so well documented, how come you don’t have ay document or proof beyond word of mouth? You are just a slander monger. I Googled the matter of both of the Obamas losing their law licenses and this is the answerI got: A court official confirms that no public
            disciplinary proceeding has ever been brought against either ofthem, contrary to a false Internet rumor. By
            voluntarily inactivating their licenses, they avoid a requirement to take continuing education classes and pay hundreds of dollars in annual fees. Both could practice law again if they chose to do so. (http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/)

        • sendtheclunkerbacktochicago

          That April 27th, 2011 computer generated nine layered document is NOT a “long form birth certificate.” Recently a man from one of Obama’s own frequently used law firms Perkins & Coi, a document expert, Reed Hayes submitted a 40 page affidavit giving all the reasons why the April 27th document is a complete and utter forgery and he is willing to testify anywhere to that FACT. There has been NO discussion about any birth certificate in any court or in any media outlet. That is the problem, there is no platform to use, everything has to be done through the back door. If this were any Republican we are talking about he would have been LONG GONE and you know it.

          • Guest

            Forged birth certificates, working under multiple aliases, and multiple fraudulent SS. #s, and not releasing his College Transcripts. .. Just what is Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, (provided that is his real name), hiding?

            We, the concerned People of the United States MUST know this.

            So who’s going to collect all of the information, and write the expose that reveals how much of a fraud. . . .What’s his Name really is? Without having a fatal “Accident”, before releasing it, of course.

          • Mark

            Forged birth certificates, working under multiple aliases, using multiple fraudulent Soc. Sec. #s, using a fraudulent Selective Service Registration number, and not releasing his College Transcripts. . .

            Why is President Barack Hussein Obama trying to hide so much of his past?

            We, the concerned People of the United States MUST know this.

            And what does this reveal about our the trustworthiness of our multiple forms of identification, that under normal circumstances would verify each other?

            So who’s going to collect all of the information, and write the expose that reveals how much of a fraud. . . .What’s his Name really is?Without having a fatal “Accident”, before releasing it, of course.

          • 123z

            You ask who is going to collect information about Obama and write about it. It seems that there is already a sufficient number of people collecting information and writing about it. You want more?

          • 123z

            Do you question that Obama’s mother was an American citizen? Do you question that the law says that the child of an American citizen is an American citizen at birth regardless of where he is born? Therefore, it doesn’t make any difference where he was born. Even if born in Kenya or wherever you wish to allege, he would still be an American citizen. John McCain was born of American citizen parents in Panama, and nothing was made of it, so I guess your comments about how a Republican would have never survived such a question is meaningless. The fact is that Obama has been subjected to all this “birther” nonsense simply because some people want to “get” him for whatever reason. You say there has been no discussion of this issue in any media outlet. Here is a talk forum where this issue has been discussed for years:

            http://www.politicalforum.com/other-miscellaneous/312862-obama-birth-certificate-scandal-reed-hayes-report.html
            I would say the issue has been discussed too much. There is no merit in it whatsoever. No matter where he was born, Obama is an American citizen. What is your problem anyway?

          • JoeBotz

            The problem is his no show typical black father was a “Subject” of the Crown, since Kenya was a Brit colony at the time! Our founding Fathers feared a Citizen who had one Parent who was loyal to the Crown/England!

          • 123z

            Whatever your feeling is about his father being a British subject, it irrelevant because our law is that the child of an American citizen born abroad is born an American citizen. You may not like that law so you can write your Congressman to have it changed. But just because you don’t like Obama doesn’t mean you can make things up as you go along. You can make up whatever you want to say about our Founding fathers but it does not change the fact that the child of an American citizen born abroad is born an American citizen.

          • Dale Nye

            I am guessing that you make up stuff about our founding fathers all the time. Seems that is okay with you. But boy, don’t be making stuff up about Obama…sort of gets to you doesn’t it? If Obama wanted to end all this he would unseal all his documents, but he does not want to do that. Why? Maybe because as he said about others, it is because he has something to hide.

          • Rod Brubeck

            What documents? School records? Why. Nobody has ever asked a candidate or POTUS for their school transcripts before until now. Can’t imagine why…har har.

          • 123z

            Are you replying to something I wrote about our founding fathers? I can’t recall what that might be. I don’t normally write about founding fathers so I don’t know why you think I am making up stuff about them. Why do you say I think it is OK to make stuff up about them? Right now, you are making up some stuff yourself about me.. With regard to Obama, I don’t know why he needs to unseal his records at Harvard Law School when his record there has already received so much favorable publicity. http://www.law.harvard.edu/news/obama-at-hls.html. He has nothing to hide but that doesn’t make any difference because you would make stuff up anyway.

          • Rod Brubeck

            He was born in Hawaii. He’s a US citizen. You people here are scary, paranoid and delusional. Are you 9/11 “truthers” as well? Thank God you are and will remain a shrinking minority. Die off already or use the ACA to seek professional mental help before you hurt yourself or others.

          • sendtheclunkerbacktochicago

            First of all we are not sure where Obama was born, the April 27th, 2011 document is a forgery. That being said we are not sure who his father is, it may have been marked “unknown” given Obama’s mother’s sordid past. There is also a bunch of material that has declared Obama was born in Kenya. I am not saying that is true, but there is just as much evidence to support that theory. A simple search will prove that point.

            If Barry Obama was indeed registered as a Indonesian citizen at Occidental College he would be a Dual Citizen, doesn’t that shed new light on the topic of eligibility? The records will someday clear that up, they are sealed today and there is no way to get at the information thus all the questions. I believe the records will show Obama did indeed register as a Indonesian citizen, thus the need for a fraudulent registration with Sel. Ser. in 2008.

            The fact that you say “nothing was made of John McCain’s birth” tells me you know nothing about the subject. There was an entire month where the left wing ORIGINAL “birthers” did all they could to prove McCain was NOT a “natural born Citizen” so much so that the U.S. Congress took up the issue. McCain surrendered his birth certificate in a week (not THREE years later). All the left wing news papers, blogs, SNOPES, Constitutional Professors, etc.took up the issue. The Senate issued a Resolution for crying out loud . If the sorry ass Republicans had demanded the same for Obama we wouldn’t be here discussing the issue because Obama does NOT HAVE a legitimate American Birth Certificate.

            As I said there has been NO discussion about the forged April 27th, 2011 document, YET. There has been NO discussion about the fraudulent Sel. Ser. registration. There has been NO discussion about the flagged SS# (042-68-4425). So I don’t know what you are talking about. However, this scandal will be big news in the months leading up to the Mid Term elections with Lt. Mike Zullo leading the way with plenty of help from a few Congresspersons.

            I don’t recall anyone calling those looking for John McCain’s “natural born Citizen” status “birthers”. DO YOU? Typical libtard way of doing business.

            Now, here is a blog for you to spend some time on so that you can become more updated on the entire “natural born Citizen” issue. Big hint, BOTH parents have to be American Citizens, in particular the FATHER.

            Applying LOGIC to the issue.

            http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/11/logic-and-defining-natural-born-citizen.html

          • SummerSands

            You are 100% wrong. POTUS can only be a “Natural Born Citizen,” meaning both parents must be Citizens of the U.S.A.

            Based on Minor vs. Hapersett, 88 U.S. 162, the Supreme Court defined “natural born citizens” as “all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.”

            “Natural born citizen” is defined as the purest form of citizenship, requiring both jus soli (“law of the soil”) citizenship and jus sanguinis (“law of the blood”) citizenship—with BOTH parents being citizens.

            US citizens, even if born in the US to parents who were both US citizens, who have any foreign citizenship, no matter when or how acquired, are not eligible to be President. This issue has nothing to do with race or ethnicity. It’s a question of loyalty and avoidance of even the appearance of conflict of interest. Nothing more, and nothing less.

            The only explicit definition of “Natural Born Citizen” in the historical record, that was provided by one of the Founders, defines it as meaning a person born in the country to citizen parents. No testimony from any other Founder or delegate of the Constitutional Convention exists that claims any other definition.

            Obviously obama was not vetted properly and by his own admitted parentage, he’s ineligible to legally hold the office of POTUS.

            Minor vs. Hapersett used the 14th Amendment as the basis for its second principal holding concerning the right to vote, but not for its first principal holding concerning whether or not the petitioner was a US citizen (court decisions can involve multiple holdings, which are the precedent-setting decisions the court makes in order to decide the legal and/or factual issues before the court in a particular case.)

            The Court in Minor determined that before it could decide the issue of whether the petitioner (who was an adult White woman) had any Federal right to vote based on the 14th Amendment, it first had to decide whether or not she was a citizen, and if so on what basis?

            The Court held that the petitioner was in fact a US citizen, and had been such from birth, before the ratification of the 14th Amendment. The reasoning the Court used to reach that holding is actually central to the question of the Supreme Court’s definition of “natural born citizen.”

            AND…that definition is pivotal regarding obama’s legitimacy to hold the office of POTUS…reason why? Re-read above.

          • 123z

            I just finished reading Minor vs. Hapersett and find that it says on Page 88 U. S. 168 “the children of citizens of the United States that might be born beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States, should be considered as natural-born citizens” which is EXACTLY what I already knew and is not consistent with the fraudulent garbage you are trying to peddle. You people have no shame whatsoever and will stop at nothing to perpetuate and reinforce the lies and slander which you continuously put forth. The very court ruling which you claim proves Obama not to be a native born citizen does the EXACT OPPOSITE.

          • Ray Williams

            Who was running for President in that ruling?Minor, or Hapersett? The Constitution spells out the requirement for POTUS quite clearly.

          • Mary

            We know Obama’s father was born in Kenya and not a U.S. citizen, but it’s his mother who’s citizenship is being called in to question here because she too was not born in the U.S. but was a U.S. ‘citizen.’ Even if a person was born to a parent who was a U.S. ‘natural born citizen’ abroad in another country that would only makes them a U.S. ‘citizen.’ In order for them to be considered a ‘natural born citizen’ they would of had to have been born to a ‘natural born citizen’ AND lived in the U.S for a required consecutive amount of years…, therefore, there is a BIG question out there whether Obama’s mother actually lived in the U.S. for the consecutive amount of years required? If she did not, this would affect whether Obama’s is in fact a ‘natural born citizen’ or not, so actually it wouldn’t matter where Obama was born Kenya, the U.S. etc. he still would not be a ‘natural born citizen.’ It even looks worse for him if he wasn’t at the very least born in the here in the U.S. So if true and neither of his parents were ‘natural born citizens,’ Obama, also would not be a ‘natural born citizen’ either, therefore, be disqualify to run for the office of President of the U.S.
            Do you see now the seriousness of the problem and why he might be so secretive about his records??

          • Mary

            It’s more complex than you think to be considered a ‘natural born citizen’ when born beyond the sea, or out of the limits of the United States to protect our Country from people who’s loyalties are not really with the U.S. of America and do not have our best interest at heart…At least one of your parents have be ‘natural born citizen’ of the U.S. AND you have to meet the live in the U.S. for the required amount of time before you are considered ‘natural born citizen’ otherwise you’re just a citizen and not lawfully qualified to run for office of President of the United States of America.

          • DLinz

            One parent is enough Summer, even if the child is born out of the US. Please don’t feed the trolls like 123 with bad information. It just serves to make them rant like a spoiled child even more.

          • ArmyRules

            Hey genius, the law says that BOTH parents must be citizens for a child born abroad to be American born and thus, a citizen themselves.

          • 123z

            Why don’t you give me a reference to the law you are talking about? Or maybe you simply don’t know what you are talking about?

            Can we agree that Obama was born AFTER May 24, 1934?

            Prior to May 24, 1934, U.S. citizen mothers were not permitted to transmit U.S. citizenship to their children born abroad. The Act of May 24, 1934 (the “1934 Statute”) gave U.S. citizen mothers equality of status regarding their ability to transmit U.S. citizenship. However the provision was not applied retroactively. Therefore, children born before May 24, 1934 to a U.S. citizen mother and an alien father did not
            acquire U.S. citizenship.

            On or after May 24, 1934, a child born outside the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, whose father or mother (or both) was a citizen of the United States at the time of the child’s birth, would be considered a United States citizen provided that the U.S. citizen parent had resided in the United States prior to the birth of the child.

          • Tree Rat

            Obama has admitted on several occasions, AND in his own autobiography that he was born in Kenya. And this article reveals some other interesting facts.http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-not-a-citizen-thanks-to-his-own-mother/ Check it out, folks.

          • 123z

            Then we must return to the birth certificate from Hawaii. Or you might prefer if we return to the allegation that Obama is really Malcolm X’s love child. If Malcolm X was his father, there is no question about his citizenship because Malsolm X was surely an American citizsen.

            Snopes.com is a prize winning fact-checking website. Here is what they have to say about Obama’s birth certificate;

            http://www.snopes.com/politics

          • 123z

            I just learned that on e-bay you can get genuine, authentic birth certificates from Kenya recording Obama’s birth there. They won’t last long so you had better hurry to get some for yourself and for Christmas presents for your friends and family. These are really nice official birth certificates,not like the shoddy makeover of an Australian birth certificate taken from the genealogical website Bomford.net that was used previously.

          • Paul Yoder

            I believe O is a citizen. The real issue about his birth is why he claimed foreign citizenry to receive college grants, and never after that reapplied to have his citizen’s status reinstated? Can you say fraud?

          • 123z

            How do you know he applied for a student loan as a foreigner? Have you seen the application? How can he reapply to have his citizenship reinstated if he never renounced it in the first place. Renouncing your citizenship is a formal legal procedure which could be reversed. However, there is nothing which can be done to reverse a lot of unfounded gossip, which seems to be Obama’s problem. You cannot very well say fraud when you cannot prove what it is that is supposed to be fraudulent.

          • Paul Yoder

            As I said, I believe BO is American, the son of two Americans. The father would be in jail if he admitted to having sex with his mother while underage. I think fraud is the real issue.
            http://conservativeangle.com/imposter-proof-occidental-recalls-barry-obama-with-records-to-prove-it/

          • John Talbert

            Even if Obama is a citizen, which I believe he is and that he was born in Hawaii, the issue about his birth isn’t about being born on foreign soil. It’s about being a natural born citizen, which the Supreme Court has never ruled on the definition of that term. If one parent is a U. S. citizen, then you are a citizen, but not necessarily a natural born citizen. The term natural born was uniquely used by the Founders and is not defined anywhere. The closest we come is in an unrelated Supreme Court case in the 19th century where it was said that to be natural born both parents must be U. S. citizens at the time of the child’s birth. Barack Obama, Sr. was a Kenyan which, at that time, was under British rule and made him a British subject, not a U. S. citizen. And he never became an American citizen. So, until the Supreme Court rules on the definition it will technically never be known whether President Obama is truly eligible to be president. And since the Supreme Court is controlled by political motives you can be sure they would never vote against him being a natural born citizen because of the political fallout that would occur if that were to be decided. It explains why Justice Thomas said they were avoiding the topic altogether. They know it’s a mess and there’s no easy way to fix it.

            But setting all of that aside and assuming you’re right in what you said, what really proves there is a problem is the birth certificate he released. No, I’m not going to even get into the discussion of people who’ve said there’s proof it’s a forgery. What I am going to raise is one simple issue that proves, without a shadow of a doubt, that it is a fraud. When you look at that certificate it asks for the parents’ race. For his father it says “African.” First, there is no such race as African. People who are African can be a multiple of different races. And in 1961 Jesse Jackson had not yet introduced the idea of blacks calling themselves African Americans. In those days blacks were called Nego or colored. If used in the question of race it would be most common to say Negroid. And there is no evidence of ANY black person having listed on their birth certificate in Hawaii or any other U. S. state at that time in history as African. Yet the president’s so called “real” birth certificate lists his father as African. It’s a very politically correct answer to the question and yet proves without a doubt that something is wrong with the document. That, and that alone, should be cause for questions.

          • 123z

            Here is a complete discussion of Obama’s birth certificate. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/birthcertificate.asp

        • Mark

          Probably all true. However, I’m also familiar with the accusation that Komrade Obama actually used multiple fraudulent SS #s before becoming President.

          Think what would happen to the average person, if he or she were convicted of working under falsified I.D.

          If he truly did that, and it hasn’t been reported, than isn’t that another part of the Scandal of Obama, Obama, who is Obama?

          And if so, why shouldn’t it be proven?

          There’s the Freedom of Information Act,. under which all of this information should be released when requested.

          If it isn’t released until after he’s completed his 2nd Term, then it’ll be useless information.

          Once again, please correct me if I’ve missed something, which I suspect I haven’t.

          Oops, I shouldn’t have said “suspect.” After all, he’s only a “person of interest,” right?

          • 123z

            Has the accusation that Obama used multiple social security numbers been proven? Why would Obama have wanted to work under a false ID? Yes, indeed, it he worked under a false ss number I think it should be proven. But what are you going to ask for under the freedom of information act. How many soci8al security numbers has Obama worked under? Where would this information be filed? You people are so consumed with hatred that you think you can just make up any allegation that suits you and suspect the government of withholding information. if there is no “proof” .You say “if this or that were true, it would add to the SCANDAL of Obama”. You just make it up as you go along.

          • Mark

            This isn’t about Hating B.H.O. It’s about holding the President of the United States accountable under the laws of the United States, as We the People are held accountable under them.

            As for the SS #s, they’d be recorded in the records of the Social Security Administration.

            And his Selective Service Registrations would be with the Records of the Selective Service System.

            Why do Liberals choose to “Selectively” apply the laws, so that their chosen leaders can “overlook” the rules when it’s convenient for them to do so?

            Yes, sadly, most politicians are discovered to be law breakers at some point in their lives. that doesn’t mean that some should be excluded from following the Laws of the Land, while others are completely destroyed when their deceptions are discovered and revealed.

            “Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.”

            Or as someone once directed us, “You Shall not Lie.”

            Not “You shall not lie,. .. . unless. . . . ‘

          • 123z

            Of course the social security admiistration has records on all social security numbers. But which ones are the ones you want to know about? How is it you know that Obama falsely used them? You cannot simply stand there and make up stuff that you think Obama probably did and expect somebody to look up the records when you provide no specific information. I think you yourself are using selectivity in accusing Obama rather than some Republicans for misusing social security numbers. What was Obama’s motivation to use false social security numbers? And how do you know Obama is lying when you do not provide us with what he said and what the truth actually is. Do you know what slander is?

        • SmartChickie

          you didn’t read the article, did you? Lots of common sense. Why would anyone protect and defend someone so strongly…someone they don’t even know? It’s like defending a celebrity….you don’t know them at all. But, we think we do, from movies. At least show yourself that you are using critical thinking……read the article…and know that there is a possibility that this is scary stuff. I know people who have lived through the Holocaust and wars…….and they fear these actions. It is true about Obamacare…it really did lessen work hours to 30 hours and your healthcare information is all being sent to the government. My Dr. told it was all going there…..that’s scary, but totally true. So listen with open ears……don’t just defend…..think “What if”…….it’s better to have all the info, than to just blindly follow anyone. Not left, not right…….stay in the middle. People don’t hate Obama……people fear him. Big difference.

          • 123z

            What article are you talking about that I did not read? If you mean the Snopes article, I think YOU are the one who did not read it. Yes indeed,it is better to have all the info rather than just blindly follow an ignorant crowd of hate-mongers. You are correct that people who lived through the Holocaust recognize this as something to be feared. It is this kind of thing that started in Holocaust in Germany. I have relatives who lived in Europe throughout the war so I have heard all about it. Take your own advice and start thinking “What if….” What if Obamacare represents nothing more than an effort to provide this country with a national health system such as every advanced country in the world already has.

          • Robert

            If the real goal of Obamacare is a sincere effort to provide this country with more plentiful, and therefore inexpensive health care, it is failing badly. Already it is piling on numerous costs to insurers still in business, which they will have to recoup if they are to survive. Many insurers see that they will not be able to survive, so they’re cutting their losses before they lose everything, leaving monopolies in some cases. And in every state outside of New York, premiums are soaring, doubling or tripling in some cases. If the real goal is to make medical care more affordable, this makes no sense whatsoever.

            If, on the other hand, the real goal of Obamacare is an evil-intentioned means to impose chains upon us and jerk us all around like slaves, engineering a future government shut-down, partial or total, and then using that future shut-down as an excuse to close all the hospitals and other places to obtain medical care, until the (ransom) demands of Obama (or another like him) are capitulated to, then Obamacare a.k.a. the “Affordable Care Act” makes PERFECT sense. And that is MUCH more likely, especially considering that having life and death control over every citizen has been the goal of every Marxist tyrant, whether Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Castro, Chavez, Kim, or Mao. There is NO reason to believe that the goal of Obama the Marxist is any different.

        • DLinz

          123z: No…….we’re not kidding. Watch this if you can, and try to be objective in viewing it, and do some critical thinking. If you come away with your blind obedience to Obama opinion intact, please seek immediate professional help. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UAg2f3dP1g

        • Dale Nye

          Yeah, all of a sudden there are just millions more racists in America if the progressives are to be believed. The idea that it is hatred of a man is shallow. It is his policies, his disregard for our Constitution, his blaming others for everything wrong which shows a real lack of leadership. The list goes on and on. But the man himself, we do not even know enough to hate. It sounds more like you projecting than any truth. Who do you think is being kidded?

          • Mark

            Correct. I remember hearing that the problem with Pres. Clinton wasn’t that he didn’t have a foreign Policy, it was that his Policies were “Foreign.”

            Now, fast forward to He. B.H.O. His policies are completely anti-America.

            And that includes his “Policy” called Obama Care. Health Insurance reform is needed. Subjecting the American People to punishment, and prison if we refuse to take part in his health care destruction program IS Un-American.

            Possibly forcing the U.S. to default on it’s financial Obligations is Un American.

            Telling our business leaders that “You didn’t create that,” and expecting them, and the majority of the American People to believe his drivel, just because he deplores American Exceptionalism, and believes that we’d be “better off” is un American.

            If anything I’ve said is racist according to others, than they don’t understand what racism is.

            Contrary to what they believe, I’ve never said that this *#&$^ Black *&#^ is destroying this country.

            I’ve only tried to point out the facts that Pres. B.H.O and his administration refuse to be “confused” by.

            Foreign Policies which damage the credibility of the United States in any way, and a strong Foreign Policy, which protects the best interests of the American People are two VASTLY DIFFERENT things.

            O’s overall Polices are totally FOREIGN to the best interests of We the People of the United States of America.

            Until he’s impeached, and all of his Communist Cronies in D.C. are removed, we shall continue to be beset by our present problems.

            I love my Country, and I truly FEAR The present Leaders who constitute our Federal Government!

        • Tree Rat

          His “s.s.#” is a number used in Connecticut, a number from a long-ago DEAD man. ( If born in Hawaii, why doesn’t his s.s. come from Hawaii?) His birth cert. has been PROVEN to be a forgery by MANY sources who examine these items for a living ! He lied when sworn in as a lawyer saying he never used any other name, when in fact he has used several different names. The list is endless. But as they say, there are none so blind as those who will not see!

          • 123z

            The other day I posted this story from the Jacksonville Times Union on Obama’s social security number, but WND butchered the website reference so that the article did not come up. Here it is again:

            By Carole Fader

            Many Times-Union readers want to know:

            Recently, there has been an email circulating on the
            Internet concerning President Barack Obama’s Social Security number. It appears that the number was originally issued to Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France and died in Hawaii. Can you confirm this?

            We can confirm that the email has been circulating, but we can’t confirm what it states as fact.

            The viral email says that Ludwig spent the last months of his life in Hawaii, where he died in 1981. It states that Obama received the SSN from his grandmother, who worked part-time at a Honolulu courthouse, where she would have access to deceased individuals’
            Social Security numbers.

            The email goes on: The suspicion is that Obama’s grandmother, knowing he was not a U.S. citizen, simply scoured the probate records until she found someone who died who was not receiving Social Security benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwig’s Connecticut SSN for Obama.

            But this is where the claim breaks down.

            The Social Security Death Index allows you to search a database of people who have been issued Social Security numbers and whose deaths were reported to the Social Security Administration beginning about
            1962.

            The information comes from the Social Security Administration’s Death Master File, which contains deaths after 1936 and which is not available online. Under the Freedom of Information Act, the SSA is
            required to disclose a Public Death Master File, but that one doesn’t include all deaths. Some genealogy sites allow searches of this death index, but many of them, such as Ancestry.com, have put access to
            Social Security numbers behind a pay wall to help prevent identity theft.

            You can search the death index for free at Family Search (tinyurl.com/bjom3d). You will find Ludwig listed there.

            The email says that the SSA was never informed of Ludwig’s death. And it states that Obama has been illegally using the SSN assigned to Ludwig, 042-68-4425.

            But the death index shows that the SSA was informed of Ludwig’s death. The Jean Paul Ludwig referred to in the email — born in 1890, lived in Connecticut, died in Hawaii — looks to be the same one listed in the database (born on Feb. 17, 1890; SSN issued in
            Connecticut; death benefits issued in Hawaii).

            But the Social Security number listed for Ludwig is 045-26-8722, not 042-68-4425.

            Finally, since non-citizens can legally obtain Social Security numbers, Snopes.com points out, the issue is moot — even if you believe that Obama is not a natural-born citizen. Having a Social Security number is hardly an indication of citizenship.

            carole.fader@jacksonville.com, (904) 359-4635

            There is a fact-checker review of almost every urban legend about Obama, but, as you say, there is no one so blind as those who will not see. You are caught up in an example of mass hysteria which will be written about for years to come in history books.

      • Mark

        In addition to these points, he refuses to release his college transcripts from a prestigious law School.

        Correct me if I’ve missed something here, but If I’d graduated from Columbia, Harvard, Princeton, or Yale Law School, or from any other division of one of these Ivy League Universities, I’d want people to have access, to my transcripts, to prove that I had the credentials for whatever position I applied for, or was elected to fill.

        But since that’s common sense, and sense isn’t always “:common” to everyone, i guess the point is moot.

      • 123z

        In attempting to track down so,me of the information in this story which no one seems to have any interest in doing, I have found that the social security number 042-68-4425 is the wrong social security number. it is not the one which was flagged by e-verify, etc. Here is a story from the Jacksonville newspaper about it; (http://jacksonville.com/news/metro/2012-02-18/story/fact-check-obamas-ssn-not-ame-dead-man ) Maybe, however, you were talking abut ANOTHER social security number and ANOTHER email giving another TRUE story

        Recently, there has been an email circulating on the Internet concerning President Barack Obama’s Social Security number. It appears that the number was originally issued to Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born
        in France and died in Hawaii. Can you confirm this?

        We can confirm that the email has been circulating, but we can’t confirm what it states as fact.

        The viral email says that Ludwig spent the last months of his life in Hawaii, where he died in 1981. It states that Obama received the SSN from his grandmother, who worked part-time at a Honolulu courthouse, where she would have access to deceased individuals’ Social Security numbers.

        The email goes on: The suspicion is that Obama’s grandmother, knowing he was not a U.S. citizen, simply scoured the probate records until she found someone who died who was not receiving Social Security benefits,
        and selected Mr. Ludwig’s Connecticut SSN for Obama.

        But this is where the claim breaks down.

        The Social Security Death Index allows you to search a database of people who have been issued Social Security numbers and whose deaths were reported to the Social Security Administration beginning about
        1962.

        The information comes from the Social Security Administration’s Death Master File, which contains deaths after 1936 and which is not available online. Under the Freedom of Information Act, the SSA is
        required to disclose a Public Death Master File, but that one doesn’t include all deaths. Some genealogy sites allow searches of this death index, but many of them, such as Ancestry.com, have put access to Social
        Security numbers behind a pay wall to help prevent identity theft.

        You can search the death index for free at Family Search (tinyurl.com/bjom3d). You will find Ludwig listed there.

        The email says that the SSA was never informed of Ludwig’s death. Andit states that Obama has been illegally using the SSN assigned to Ludwig, 042-68-4425.

        But the death index shows that the SSA was informed of Ludwig’s death. The Jean Paul Ludwig referred to in the email — born in 1890, lived in Connecticut, died in Hawaii — looks to be the same one listed in the database (born on Feb. 17, 1890; SSN issued in Connecticut; death benefits issued in Hawaii).

        But the Social Security number listed for Ludwig is 045-26-8722, not 042-68-4425.

        Finally, since non-citizens can legally obtain Social Security numbers, Snopes.com points out, the issue is moot — even if you believe that Obama is not a natural-born citizen. Having a Social Security
        number is hardly an indication of citizenship.

        Read more at Jacksonville.com: http://jacksonville.com/news/metro/2012-02-18/story/fact-check-obamas-ssn-not-same-dead-man#ixzz2i08vsNYR

    • melloe

      That is because what they are talking about mostly are manufactured crisis jimmied up by Issa trying to find a way to hurt the administration. One thing after another about which if you get the facts, it may be be bad, but not what they promote for their own nefarious reasons. “Benghazi” Benghazi Benghazi …4 US people, and quite a few locals gave their lives, but a fairly minor event compared to the 16 or so events under Bush, and the 306 who died in one event under Reagan. The biggest problem with Benghazi was he was where he should not have been, and the CIA was involved. People sent to aid got hung up at the airport PPPP on their leaders part. And no one wanted to release data at first because the CIA was still trying to piece the facts ( or at least what they wanted us to believe were the facts ) .. which made for a field day with the pundits. When some one on the right wants to belittle someone on the left they say “Benghazi”, or some comment about the left don’t care about those 4 people. When someone on the left wants to jab someone on the right, they say “Benghazi” Sick in both cases.

  • mountainaires

    These days–especially these days–the reaction of conservatives to Leftist rhetorical slashing and burning is best summed up as “deer caught in the headlights.” They are first shocked, then baffled, then confused, then alarmed. Oh, yes, they are afraid, very afraid. Because they can see that their opponent will not moderate their rhetoric or their tactics in any way; and such an opponent justifies fear in reasonable men. We really need to stop trying to be “reasonable” men. We really need to learn the slash and burn strategy; don’t be afraid to call it like you see it–Marxists, Totalitarians, Tyrannical, whatever. I see conservatives being so cautious, so civil, so reasonable, so respectful that we are constantly on the defensive, trying to explain. Just today, one conservative, responding to an epithet about conservatives being racist, PROCEEDED TO APPEASE A LEFTIST hurling yet another charge of “racism” and stereotype an entire ideological group because there was a confederate flag at a rally. Now, this “conservative” proceeded to denounce the confederate flag on twitter, in order to differentiate himself from the target of the Leftists racist charge. The proper response SHOULD HAVE BEEN to point out to the leftist that she is nothing but a totalitarian in the same vein as Stalin. Why do we always give them ammunition against us, by helping them further their nasty narratives about us?

    • CoweringCoward

      Insanity only fears GREATER INSANITY.

  • BHOHG2G

    What I see happening in Gvt now is two parties trying to attain entirely different goals. Now most people would think that the two parties are trying to reach the same goal, but just go about it taking different paths, because , hey we’re all Americans right? WRONG!
    The goals of the left and the right couldn’t be farther apart.
    This is like trying to come to a compromise between NAZIS and Jews.
    The problem on our end is extreme media bias for the left and the everyday low info person on the street that thinks they are well informed.
    The more the communists tear down the country , the more blame they heap on conservatives and the low info types just fall into line.
    They have a huge advantage by doing this.
    I really do see an armed conflict coming in this country.

    • CoweringCoward

      Yep, voting is not going to fix this one, not with the elites electing a new people (with us paying for our own dispossession) right out from under us.

      3% wanted the American Revolution, I am betting we can still muster an informed and motivated 3%.

      Matt Bracken made a comment in an article recently that I just cannot stop quoting, “Plans to ride a tiger and actually riding a tiger are not the same thing”

  • John West

    When you say ‘fight’ …. I trust you mean with guns and bombs and whatever it takes to win a revolution and depose all who are presently in power.

    The only other way to achieve it is to nuke them from space. I suggest the former as more doable. And that is what it is going to take. The time for talk is over, the left doesn’t talk, they scream and rant and want to kill you for being conservative.

    So to quote a great American General, “We need to kill the bastards before they kill us”.

  • Ashley Ann Thomas

    Obama and his minions will be left here to go through the armegeddon meat grinder. And there will be NO escape.

    • CoweringCoward

      O’benito will hopefully find his lamp post along with his buddies.

  • 4Pip

    I’ve known O.is evil for some time,his latest actions are just more proof of it. While he stops the Military from getting their pay,he is making sure Mexico gets our money. One piece I read said how he was taking $100.00 to give their Gov’t so their economy would get better. This man has even been setting up Jihadist traing camps around our country,there are 17 states with 35 camps. Allof them are traiining to kidnap and fight us here.

  • Wizardofoz

    It is no wonder this great country is on its way to becoming a banana republic with the contorted thinking and political power of the so called conservative movement. It’s easy to spot someone who believes in the paranoid thinking and clinging onto the fears of the Cold War – another contrivance of the fear mongers – with your hyperbole and wanting to yell down an educated point of view. It’s all one big conspiracy in your little, delusional mind. Of course, your insanity is not complete without a reference to Hitler. I support the duly elected President and believe in the powers set forth by the Constitution. You are a fascist who would have done well in the ore-civil war south – assuming your skin color wasn’t black.

    • Rose215

      You have not done a good job of explaining your quarrel with the arguments put forward by Horowitz. For you it’s just that they are “paranoid” and their arguments “hyperbole”. Pray tell, what is the “educated point of view” that you think Horowitz is “yelling down”? Seriously, your comment is totally without substance. Horowitz may not be correct on all of the points he brings forward, but all of them provide a potentially accurate perspective and as such need to be given serious consideration.

      • June Clinkenbeard

        I should have read your reply before replying myself. You said exactly what I was thinking but couldn’t formulate. I long for someone with intelligence to make the Liberal argument but alas, there doesn’t seem to be anyone available, or capable for that matter. It’s always the same screeds.

        I am reminded of the people who were treading water, begging Noah to let them onto the Ark…

        • prstewart

          Exactly. Never ever do I hear a reasonable, substantive or logical rebuttal to anything… just hate and marginalization. Oh and mocking. Can’t forget that, their favorite quick reply tool. Alinsky’s Rules for all of them and most don’t even know who Alinsky was.

    • CoweringCoward

      One word comes to mind. “IDIOT”

    • 1redcent

      Oh, so you’re just a stinking MARXIST, who isn’t just an ignorant lefty git, but STUPID to boot.

      The COLD WAR was and still is REAL, not some paranoid contortion; however, because you are a “useful tool” of a MARXIST, you babble on, drooling and spewing the stale, puerile, perverse old talking points!

      Of course you support Obama, he’s a tyrannical dictator who HAS set America on the path to be another ZIMBABWE !

      And no matter WHAT you imagine you know………….HITLER AND THE NAZIS WERE LEFTY SOCIALISTS !

      You only support Obama because you’re an anti-American, COMMIE TROLL !

      • prstewart

        Thing is…. the trolls, haters and minions will be right down in the bread line with us… shackled to a weight they’ll never be without in their lifetime.

    • Ratt Stone

      And you are from Oz and don’t believe in conspiracies ?

    • June Clinkenbeard

      There are so many fallacies in your argument, as well as liberal constructs based on fairy dust, that I don’t know where to start. Way to inject yourself into a discussion and add absolutely nothing to it.

    • Infidel51

      Your comment is a perfect example of the backwards prog thinking expplained in the article. Thank you for your impeccable timing.

    • dusel1

      US Revolutionary War – An Awakening1
      US Civil War – A Nightmare1
      Obama Elected as Putative President – A Nightmare2
      Obama Arrested, Convicted, and Executed for treason – An Awakening2

  • timmycrw91

    I was reading this, pumping my fist in the air! It was THAT good. Thank you, David!

  • Wartface

    Horowitz leaves out the judges of America… They are communist too. They are more than willing to legislate from the bench too. John Roberts is the only reson we have OWEbamacare. John Roberts is a communist operative for sure.

    • Mark

      This Is why the Following Liberty Amendment, by mark Levin is so Timely:

      An Amendment to Establish Term Limits For Supreme Court Justices, and Super Majority Legislative Override.

      Section 1 No Person shall serve as Chief or Associate Justice of the Supreme Court for more than a combined total of 12 years.

      Section 2: Immediately upon ratification of this Amendment, Congress shall organize the justices of the Supreme Court, as equally as possible into three classes, with the justices assigned to each class
      in reverse seniority order; with the most senior justices in the 1st Class; and their Terms shall expire at the end of the fourth Year following the ratification of this Amendment.

      The Terms for the justices on the Second Class shall expire at the end of the eight Year; and of the Third Class, ad the end of the 12th Year; so that one-third of the justices may be chosen every fourth Year.

      Section 3 When a Vacancy occurs in the Supreme Court, the President shall nominate a new justice, who with the approval of a majority of the Senate shall serve the remainder of the unexpired term. Justices who fill a vacancy for longer than half of an expired term shall not be renominated to a full term.

      Section 4: Upon three-fifths vote of the House of Representatives and the Senate, Congress may override a majority opinion rendered by the Supreme Court.

      Section 5: The Congressional Override under Section 1 is not subject to a Presidential veto, and shall not be the subject of litigation or review in any Federal or State Court.

      Section 6: Upon three-fifths vote of the several state legislatures, the
      States my override a majority opinion rendered by the Supreme court.

      Section 7: The States’ override under Section 3 shall not be the subject of litigation or review in any Federal of State court, or oversight interference by Congress or the President.

      Section 8: Congressional or State override authority under Sections 3 and 4 must be exercised no later than twenty-four months from the date of the Supreme Court rendering its majority opinion. , after which date Congress and the States are prohibited from the override.

      Section 9: This Amendment shall take effect in the fourth fiscal year following its ratification.

      If you’re interested in his other Amendments, then buy or download “The Liberty Amendments, Restoring the American Republic.”

      I know he’s 100% Correct. See what you think.

  • Robert

    If the goal of Obamacare were more plentiful, and therefore cheaper, medical care, the act makes no sense whatsoever. If the real goal of Obamacare is an evil-intentioned scheme to block citizens from getting medical care when needed in a bid to lord over, control, and enslave them, until they kiss the Democrat party’s ring in abject submission, then the act makes PERFECT sense. Lording over, controlling, and enslaving man, and forcing him to bow down in submission is the ambition of Satan, The Adversary. Coincidence? I think not. Just look at all the other Adversarial ways the “progressives” treat normal humanity – constantly deceiving, maligning, traducing, and calumniating those who want to live their lives their own way. They even talk about the people and those who truly represent them as adversaries and enemies. Progressives who see a war between saints and Satan are right in one sense – but they are the forces of Satan against all of humanity.

  • funkyonion

    In God We Trust as ONE in the balance between control and freedom. Without truth, there is no validity.

  • John Fryman

    I enjoyed the article until I got to the Libya part where he says O didn’t consult anyone, including the UN.
    While true that he didn’t care enough to get support from the people or congress, the UN is about the only one he DID consult, and NATO is what went into Libya. The running joke after the french were the first planes to go in & drop bombs was people were surprised they hadn’t surrendered yet, hehehe
    Just sayin’, I like the article a lot, but he should have gotten that right too.

    • dusel1

      The USA does not and should not answer to the Union of Nerds (UN).

  • Heidikitty

    Does anyone believe Obama is paying off in one way shape or form all the democrats to stand up for him or did he spy on them and use something against them they do not want to come out? I just cannot believe people would turn against our country that way as they are not that stupid.

    • ARRRGGGHH

      I wonder what happened to Justice Roberts? What would make him vote 180 degrees against his principles? We know from the evidence that the NSA was spying on high-profile government officials and because of that, any data gathered could have been used against him.

    • heykyleinsf

      stock market record high..
      bush soiled a record surplus and record peace time.

      Republicans are done.
      Buh bye

  • RAYAKE

    for the life of me….I can not understand why people would follow a person like this.. all thru history we have seen these people ruin countless countries..KILL million’s and YET there are FOOL’S that follow them like sheep..may GOD have mercy on there FIBBLE mind’s and open there eye’s and ear’s…

    • heykyleinsf

      what’s a fibble mind genius?

      • prstewart

        Stop being a douche douche. oh nvm

    • Robert

      On second thought, may Yahowah judge those dictatorial wannabes, born of poisonous snakes, who would willingly and knowingly reelect such a malicious character as Obama precisely because of his malicious and predatory character to prey upon and victimize the entire country, and condemn those willing accomplices to eternal anguish in the abyss!

  • SummerSands

    The first step to stopping these “demoncratic progressives” is to start calling them what they are, COMMUNISTS! Quit beating around the bush people and say it…COMMUNISTS!!! They are the destroyers of liberty and freedom…they are…

    C-O-M-M-U-N-I-S-T-S!

    obutthead is a self-proclaimed marxist, he is a COMMUNIST! pelosi, reid and all the rest of the moronic minions who support him in his endeavor to enslave the American Citizens and make the United States of America a 3rd world country, well, they are COMMUNISTS.

    The only way to get people to disengage their head from the obutthead rectal train is to call them all exactly what they are, COMMUNISTS.

    • heykyleinsf

      D-I-P-S-H-I-T Dipshit

      • SummerSands

        M-O-R-O-N-I-C J-A-C-K-A-S-S…MORONIC JACKASS

      • Suzyqpie

        Thank you for your Excellent scholarship and a valuable contribution to the conversation.

  • heykyleinsf

    conservative cowards. Always something velly skelly.. WTF. Grow up.

    • vutsrq

      Does it hurt to be so stupid?

  • Z54

    It would be nice if Mr. Horowitz had a clue as to what he was mumbling about! But he doesn’t!

    • vutsrq

      What’s your seeing-eye dog’s name?

  • emeraldeyes24

    Where, in all of Barack Obama’s history or actions, has he ever been connected to the Communist party or demonstrated any Communist leanings. For Horowitz, who has defied everything that his” despicable” parents (in his mind now because their political affiliations were different from his now far right leanings), clearly any politics over the centrist line is extreme for this guy. Fact is that Barack Obama is a Liberal with Conservative fiscal views, but socialist where social programs are concerned, socialist to the extent that the rich should pay their fair share into the public coffers of the people, for the people.
    The president has not had a sustained chance to give the people what they need and deserve, since the Republicans have done everything that they could muster to unhinge any initiatives that he has had that would benefit the hundreds of millions who work hard to keep the country going and also pay taxes – big taxes in relation to their earnings and the weight of the burden of their contribution to the country overall. Big percentage of taxes and very big burden of contribution. President Obama told the country that he was coming to Washington to make ”Change”, and up to this point, he has in some small ways, despite the obstruction, games, and lies that the Republicans have played out every day since he was elected x 2 . That could change BIG TIME IF voters return him a Democratic Senate and House of Representatives in 2014. He has proven himself to be a responsible and cautious, careful money manager, not ever given to rash or impulsive decisions. If the government becomes fully Democrat, he will be able to make many, many changes for the good of the country. Being the hardest working president in living memory, he will vastly improve jobs because he will create an environment that fosters an even stronger business and industry relationship, he will be able to improve the Affordable Care Act, to bring it more in line with what the ACA originally looked like, make America the country for the people, all the people, not just the rich!
    Horowitz is just one more Republican whiner who puts money, power and prestige before people, someone who fabricates the truth, outright lies when he feels the need to do so and uses inflammatory language that strikes fear in the nieve and uninformed and riles the Republican base. In the Republican mind, anything that smacks of socialism is evil and definitely the word ”communist” still strikes the fear of Armaggadon in the hearts of the Right. Do your homework Horowitz and be scrupulously honest and fair next time.

    • Rose215

      It is hard to know how to respond to this post, but I do think it is important to at least communicate that those who are skeptical of Obama and worry about a hidden agenda are not just evil minded Republicans, selfishly looking to further their own interests. In my view, raising taxes on the rich is quite o.k., but that will not in anyway address the problem of our massive debt.

      I think there are legitimate and urgent concerns about the economy at this point. The expenditures and the levels of debt are mind-boggling. Obama has increased the debt considerably — and, of course, Obamacare will further increase the debt. I am not sure by what measure you view Obama as fiscally prudent. I also am not sure on what basis you can claim he is “the hardest working president in living memory,” — when he is on the golf course very frequently, visiting talk shows (maybe that counts for work these days). I recall the original urgency with which he pushed for the passing of this gargantuan ACA (just after his initial election). Then, it turned out that the main “urgency” was his need to go on vacation. What President goes to bed when a hostage taking is underway — or plays some game while the Bin Laden capture is happening. It’s bizarre. The bill was prepared well in advance of his assuming office, but I personally doubt that he has even read it. He does not come across as informed or engaged in the processes of the office he occupies.

      Clearly I do not trust Obama — some of it has to do with the murkiness in his background — but I am willing to look carefully and give him credit where credit is due. I am concerned however that with many of his comments he has revealed himself to be weak and ineffectual, rather than inspiring. His message is one that undercuts the American spirit, rather than inspiring striving and accomplishment. (e.g. You didn’t create that business.). He exploits the racial divide — and this I think is particularly hurtful to poor Blacks. He provokes an atmosphere of grievance and entitlement. And too many things are done in secret or away from public scrutiny (like the recent firing of a bunch of generals). I am not sure how all of this will turn out in the end, but the source of the problem is not the Republicans (or those who vote for them). I think that is just scapegoating. Most Democrats are also probably looking for real solutions. As I see it, the problem at this point is that we are being lead off a cliff (maybe change requires that) by someone whom I find difficult to have confidence in.

      • prstewart

        Thx for sane & remarkably polite reply. Tonight I’m just too frustrated (with all the conflicting info and character attacks) to be my usual civil self. I pretty much feel the same but with a much larger cynic lurking inside! =) I personally feel the ‘murky’ past is much more relevant. We are all shaped by our earlier environment and w/out a true pivot rarely change direction. Night and again… thanks!

    • vutsrq

      For an answer to your initial question, do your homework. You can easily find numerous documented examples in 10 minutes. But first, you should probably check out the topic of your question. Get a clue by familiarizing yourself with communist ideology, then do your homework on Obama the Communist. Don’t be scared. The truth will save you, and as an added plus, you’ll then be smarter than your friends.

    • prstewart

      “Where, in all of Barack Obama’s history or actions, has he ever been connected to the Communist party or demonstrated any Communist leanings. ”

      SERIOUSLY? sry caps but ffs learn to read and think for yourself. It was ingrained in him since birth by family, friends and mentors… and that just through his teen years. It got much more ‘real’ after that.

      • AussieBrit

        So, using this logic, Horowitz himself cannot be right wing, he must be left wing or even a Communist, as his family are all left wing, his early activities were on the left,a nd for much of his adult life he was anything but a conservative.
        So, there can’t be any chance he’s changed his mind, decided that he was wrong.
        I think your arguement is very faulty

  • Mr Mike

    The only thing more ridiculously stupid than this article is the level of stupidity expressed in the comments. Conservatives are the enemies of America, you are destroying the American dream for the poor and middle class.

    • vutsrq

      It figures that you used a TV still in an attempt to buttress your insipid opinion. Sitcoms shape the views of the majority of liberal/regressive, progressive morons. Each day the useful idiots sit in front of the telescreen, absorbing the progressive/communist propaganda. Soon you will all be ready for your morning physical jerks.

    • dusel1

      Got question your own intelligence by invoking fake intelligence from Hellywood.

      • Mr Mike

        I have to question your intelligence if you do not understand the concept of a meme.

  • msbets

    It doesn’t take rocket science nor a brain surgeon………I don’t claim to be a scholar, nor am I the sharpest tool, but I could see this comin down the pike in ’08, I begged, pleaded, shouted, screamed, for people to see thru this narcissistic,Ill tempered, evil, vile little man cretin…………..nope I was just a raving lunatic, and called a racist. I hope like hell, we have woke a sleeping giant, if not our country is gone………NOW ANOTHER FORECAST……..hillary IS A MARXIST……..SHE SAID HERSELF IN HER FAILED CAMPAIGN, SHE WAS A PROGRESSIVE….AKA…….MARXIST, COMMIE, WHAT EVER, DON’T VOTE FOR HER IF SHE RUNS, IT WILL LEAD TO NOTHING MORE THAN AN EXTENSION OF THE MONGREL RABID DOG, WE HAVE NOW.

  • melloe

    I found this fantasy fiction piece to be entertaining and in places humorous for the outlandish stupidity. But reading down, it is the sort of thing many here want to read to salve their conscience for what they are doing to the country I suppose. If we could ever get rid of or convert the far left and the far right and find a way to work together, there might be some hope for the country. Reading the comments here and a few far left sites , I wonder. May the Good Lord guide us.

    • vutsrq

      Obama is a communist, as are most liberals/progressives. We do not compromise with communists. We must resist the entire ideology and we must, and will, defeat them.

  • Tucker

    No, Mr. Horowitz. Obama is not destroying our nation. He is merely following in the footsteps of every one of his predecessors, Republicrat and Democrat alike – since 1913, when ethnic parasites who share your DNA manage to establish their privately owned Federal Reserve Bank and took control of the printing presses and start printing worthless slips of paper for the cost of the paper and ink and then ‘lending’ those slips of paper to the US Government and charging INTEREST on those loans.

    So, how about assigning the blame where it rightfully belongs, i.e., on the Vampires who’ve repeated this bloodsucking and plundering criminal enterprise of theirs in every historic White European nation where they’ve managed to seize control of the banking system?

    Blaming Obama for it (and I hate his guts) is about like blaming spoons for Rosey O’Donnell or Chris Christie for being disgustingly fat.

  • feedmeseymour

    Jesus was black and so is your president, get over it already.

    • John Fryman

      Wrong on both accounts….One’s mixed, and the other would have likely been a light tan coming from that part of the world. BTW, We would have been MUCH better off if O really WAS a black man from AMERICA!
      But great job seeing everything only about race though, sheeeesh! :(

    • dusel1

      Go back to math class.
      Obama – or whatever name he has today, is 50% cracker, 34% raghead, and 16% Negro. So get over – whatever IT is.

  • Robert

    So after the Washington fat cats (mostly Democrats, and Establishment Republicans) conspired to enrich themselves by selling our kids $6 trillion further into debt slavery (national debt combined with direct taxes on the fruits of labor), they still aren’t satisfied. Those same Washington fat cats want to turn the health care system into a weapon against the people so that in a future government shut-down, partial or complete, a malicious character like Obama can choose to shut down all the hospitals and other places to get medical care, GENUINELY taking away everybody’s health CARE, and GENUINELY taking the entire country hostage until their “ransom demands” are capitulated to in full. This is exactly why government control over the health care system must absolutely never be so much as tolerated! Hold the line, guys. Block government control over the health care system – our very survival depends on it. This also illustrates vividly why government control over other areas that affect our lives need to be abolished.
    And don’t even believe the b.s. about reaching the debt limit causing a default. Reaching the borrowing limit is not a default. Only failing to pay the interest and principal when due constitutes a default, and the government brings in enough money in just one month to pay all the interest on the debt for an entire year. All that reaching the debt limit really means is that the government FINALLY has to start operating on a balanced budget, like they should have been doing all along. And it also means the government can’t sell our children and grandchildren any deeper into debt slavery than they already have.

  • mallen

    Very scary, but the writing has been on the wall since the day Obama got in office, and told us all that he was going to fundamentally change America, (our first clue) and he immediately spoke as president, not to America, but to the Muslims! That was the second huge clue.

  • bignasty96

    Jesus Christ, do you idiots actually believe this nonsense??!?!

    • John Fryman

      Why not, it’s mostly all accurate except for the Libya part where he says O didn’t consult anyone, including the UN.While true that he didn’t care enough to get support from the people or congress, the UN is about the only one he DID consult, and NATO is what went into Libya. I remember the running joke after the french were the first planes to go in & drop bombs, people were surprised they hadn’t surrendered yet, hahaha.

    • dusel1

      Yes I do; and don’t call me shirley.

  • cheute79

    Obama is deceptive, but he is not so much a liar. We have what “we” voted for. He repeatedly and boldly stated that, if elected, he would “fundamentally change America”. So very many of his supporters, especially the early ones, told everyone that he would be “the first post-partisan president, the first “post-racial president”, and that he was “a unifier, not a divider”. In Obama’s book he said that people gave him a face, and posted on that face the things they wanted to see. he never disabused them of such things, but he never said he was those things. His handlers did. In fact, I believe that he is a sort of innocent and sort of honest socialist, obviously strongly fascist, raised as such, groomed as such, and doesn’t even know it. Of course he uses the words Horowitz says that socialists and communists use: progressive, liberal, and somehow caring. I suspect that his puppet masters, those who he has placed in strategic positions, recognized his “palate face” and honest socialist views, and new they had their “in”. And we (the collective we, not those who really know and care and see their country and lifestyle being destroyed) got who we voted for. I also suspect that the Republican powers-that-be wanted Obama in place. Why else nominate John McCain to face off against an untested unknown? Almost anyone else would have won the presidency in 2008.

  • 123z

    I think this report clarifies ths birth certificate issue. http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/birthcertificate.asp

    • sendtheclunkerbacktochicago

      SNOPES!!! REALLY!! Ask David Horowitz what he thinks about your dopey little SNOPES family? Would you really bring SNOPES to court with you (LMAO).

      • 123z

        I think Horowitz would agree with me that the whole birth certificate/false social security numbers/selective service registration issue is a bunch of garbage. You turkeys were complaining that he does not address these issues and seems to try to sweep them under the rug. Why do you suppose he takes such an attitude? Because he thinks they are unworthy issues. Snopes, however, addresses each of your complaints in detail. Maybe you don’t want to see your issues refuted point by point. Whether someone is dopey and little has nothing to do with whether they are right or wrong.

        • roberted

          If you can be born anywhere and still be a natural born citizen, then
          why was this amendment to the Constitution proposed in 2000 as Barney
          Frank tried to grease the path to the presidency for his buddy, Barack
          Hussein Obama?

          http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/judiciary/hju67306.000/hju67306_0.htm

          http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=pur1.32754070182286;view=1up;seq=1

          There
          were also 8 bills introduced in Congress from 2003 till 2008 trying to
          remove the requirement for being born on American soil from the
          Constitution’s presidential eligibility requirement. They all failed:

          http://www.morningliberty.com/2011/07/04/top-8-attempts-to-approve-barry-soetoro-congress-knew/

          Was he born in Kenya? All these sources think so:

          http://theobamafile.com/_eligibility/WhatToBelieve.htm

          • 123z

            I have no idea why Barney Frank introduced that bill or why anyone else did likewise. However, I do know that anyone who is born abroad with one American citizen parent acquires American citizenship. If you question this, do some research for yourself to find out if it is right or wrong. My father’s sister married and Italian and had two children born in Italy who were both American citizens at birth. There are a lot of other people with similar backgrounds. So if you have some problem with this, then do whatever you want about it. Just stop the screaming and yelling that a person born abroad with one American citizen parent cannot be a citizen. It is your problem, not mine, if you cannot look up the facts for yourself. Maybe you cannot read. This is not my problem.

          • 123z

            Further to my previous response here is an article from legalzoom on children born abroad:

            http://www.legalzoom.com/marriage-divorce-family-law/family-law-basics/is-your-child-us

            Among other things it explains that “Although the “citizenship by birth” rules have been complex, the
            February 2001 Child Citizenship Act (CCA) simplified the process.” I think the introduction of the CCA may be what caused the confusion which some people interpreted as being an attempt to remove the requirement for being born on American soil. Probably just at that time they wanted to simplify this complex issue because both John McCain and Barak Obama were born abroad of American Parents.The traditional rules applying to citizenship were always 1.the rule of place,and 2. rule of parents. Thus, you could either acquire citizenship by reason of the place where you were born, or by reason of your parents. I believe our laws have always allowed for the children born abroad of American citizens to acquire citizenship through their parents. However, whether it had to be one or both parents has changed over time. At one point it was only through an Amerian citizen father. It was the constant changes in the exact nature of these regulations that caused them to be so complex, and the necessity of determining exactly what regulations were in effect at the time of birth.

          • roberted

            You are right, you have no idea, citizenship and natural born citizenship are not the same thing.

            Did you read the eight bills which also attempted to remove the requirement for “natural born citizenship”, (presidential eligibility), that says one must be born on America soil? Or the many worldwide references to “Kenyan born” Senator Obama?

            The reason for the attempts to change the eligibility requirement which I linked is because the many members of Congress who, along with Barney Frank introduced and/or co-sponsored them knew that “citizen” and natural born citizen are not the same thing…..they wanted to change that and they failed, then they just ignored the requirement, like you are doing.

          • 123z

            Ted Cruz wasn’t born in this country, either. I’m sorry you don’t like the law of this land. Get with it and stop all the ranting and raving. I am sure there are enough of you lunatics around to fund a court case so why don’t you go to court to prove that the law of this land is that citizenship is acquired by birth on American soil only. Good luck, jackass.

          • 123z

            Furthermore, Mitt Romney was born in Mexico and Barry Goldwater was born in Arizona before it became a State. There have already been lawsuits about Obama’s citizenship and his right to be President and these lawsuits have failed. You are barking up the wrong tree, .

          • roberted

            How is presenting factual information in the form of a federal government proposed amendment to the Constitution, actual bills introduced by Congress and actual news articles from all over the world, “ranting and raving”?

            Did you read all of it…or any of it?

            Your name calling defines you.

          • 123z

            As a matter of fact I did indeed read Barney Frank’s bill which you apparently did not. It has absolutely nothng to do with persons born abroad of American parents being considered natural born citizens. It is a a bill to allow NATURALIZED citizens to become president. There has never been any allegations that Obama is a naturalized citizen. I beg of you. please, please read the bill before you start spouting off. There is a big, big difference between a person who has acquired citizemship through an American citizen parent and a person who is a Naturalized citizen. If you cannot understand this issue, please have someone explain it to you before you make a fool out of yourself again. I have no idea why Barney Frank introduced this bill, but having read it, I can say that wjhatever the reason was, it had nothing to do with Barak Obama. To date, nio one has yet alleged that Barak is a Naturalized citizen.

          • 123z

            Yes indeed they knew that “citizen” and “natural born citizen” are not the same thing. Similarly, although “Natural Born Cirizen” and “Naturalized Citizen” are both citizens, they also are not the same thing. Indeed, the Constitution also knew it when it stated: No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President. What this means is that Naturalized Citizens are prohibited from becoming President We have a definition of natural born citizen as a person either born in this country or born of American citizens abroad. However, Naturalized citizens are those who come here from overseas and become citizens in a court proceeding. Barney Frank and some other congressman felt it was unfair that a naturalized citizen who had lived hear for many years could not become President. He and others made unsuccessful efforts to change the law for this reason. Now, however, the paranoid maniacs who are out to get Obama’s skin claim that the efforts were made to change the law with respect to Naturalized citizens to enable him to become president. If Obama were in fact a Naturalized citizen he would not be eligible to be President, and if he had indeed been elected despite being a Naturalized citizen, it would be a violation of the constitution. However, he is not a Naturalized citizen and no one has ever alleged that he is a Naturalized citizen You people do not discriminate because of race so likewise I am going to try not to discriminate because of low information. When you people speak about low information voters, however, please look in the mirror..

      • 123z

        The Snopes family was a fictional family in one of William Faulkner’s books. Snopes.com, however, is a prize winning fact-checking internet site. Look up snopes.com while you are laughing.

  • prstewart

    If we get a chance to vote in ’16.

  • Higherstandard13

    We did not vote for him… it is liberals and all those that voted for him are the ones that should be held accountable for the debt and his actions. Obama also murder of Christians and abuse of them in the US military for he is no Christian as he tries to force Christians to change their beliefs.
    Obama is evil and no better than any other mass murdering tyrant in history.

  • Pete

    Fantastic. Insightful and an inspiration. The Left are scurrying like an intruder once the light switch has been turned on.

  • 123z

    An even bigger hint is that if you do your homework, you would find that after May 24, 1934 only one parent has to be an American citizen and the MIOTHER (yes, a female) can also transmit American citizenship. I wish you ignorant jerks knew what you were talking abut before you started screaming and yelling.

  • 123z

    I read the blog you reference. What a pompous jackass! I see that he has all you ignorant fools bamboozled. Why don’t you look things up for yourself and think for yourself instead of swallowing all that endless swill which this fool grinds out, page after page.

  • roberted

    If you can be born anywhere and still be a natural born citizen, then why was this amendment to the Constitution proposed in 2000 as Barney Frank tried to grease the path to the presidency for his buddy, Barack Hussein Obama?

    http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/judiciary/hju67306.000/hju67306_0.htm

    http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=pur1.32754070182286;view=1up;seq=1

    There were also 8 bills introduced in Congress from 2003 till 2008 trying to remove the requirement for being born on American soil from the Constitution’s presidential eligibility requirement. They all failed:

    http://www.morningliberty.com/2011/07/04/top-8-attempts-to-approve-barry-soetoro-congress-knew/

    Was he born in Kenya? All these sources think so:

    http://theobamafile.com/_eligibility/WhatToBelieve.htm

  • ocarol500

    The ONLY way we Conservatives can educate the Latino community is if we translate articles like this one into Spanish.

    “La batalla más importante en el mundo de hoy no se está librando en el Medio Oriente, pero aquí en casa en los Estados Unidos. Si perdemos esta batalla, todo está perdido. Pero si vamos a tomar la medida de los enemigos de la libertad y preparar nosotros mismos para luchar contra ellos, tenemos un mejor inclusive la posibilidad de ganar “.

  • Tree Rat

    Obama attended school on “foreign student aid” provided by we, the taxpayers. AMERICAN CITIZENS do not used “FOREIGN” aid! He is NOT American, in so many different matters, that I really can’t see how people remain so blind and unbelieving.

  • DONNA LANDS

    This article speaks the truth for I see the same thing. Do not listen to those that attack truth tellers for they walk the evil path of power and treasure seeking from their neighbors. They covet their neighbors property and future.
    There is really nothing you can do that our forefathers were able to do without a government permit,license or regulation for they control everything.
    May God have mercy on this country because of the Demons that are on the left liberal Democrat party. You aught to listen to Paul Harvey, “If I was the Devil” from 1965. His predictions seem to be this countries path to perdition lead by none other then the Democrat party and that is a fact. Reach into your heart and then open your eyes to the awakening of truth and then maybe you will understand.

  • James Simpson

    Leftists don’t argue, they strategize. They are not debating with you, they are considering how best to destroy you. They are not interested in facts except as those facts advance their sole, single cause: absolute power. And as David says, if you think they are vicious now, you cannot imagine how bad it will be if they win. Bill Ayers wasn’t kidding back then when they were trying to figure out how they would murder 25 million recalcitrant Americans. The figure will be larger.

  • Jason Maloney

    Great article here!,,I just question his optimism in his comment “The good news is that the bad five years we have just been through have aroused a sleeping giant among Americans who didn’t see it coming and couldn’t imagine that it would. For the first time since the Cold War, people with a public voice are calling socialists by their right name; conservatives are finally organizing at the grassroots to defend their freedom; and at last we have leaders who are willing to stand up to the thuggery of the left and who have the spine not to back down.”
    I hope that is true,,but I dont see it and cant believe he won 2nd time..Altho I think the voter ID laws and election fraud played a big part.I hope he is right tho,but doubt it.

  • Ginger Rogers7

    The key to understanding “Progressives” is the “2nd feature”:

    “The second feature of the progressive left that is key to understanding
    it is its instinctive, practiced, and indispensable dishonesty.”

    The 2nd feature is the tipoff.
    Jesus: “You belong to your father, the devil. . .
    . . . for there is no truth in him.
    WHEN he lies, he speaks his native language,
    for he is a liar and the father of lies.” John 8:44

    Q: Doesn’t it stand to reason that Satan’s followers would be liars?
    Progressives are really satanworshippers and witches.
    Their aim is to enslave the whole human race under the yoke of socialism.

    LaRaza is a Socialist front grp.
    The mother of the Boston bombers was on welfare.

    The game is to use the lie of socialism to create human misery.

  • mrpoohead

    I have just come across this site having received as an attachment an article entitled “67 years later” written by our Mr. Horowitz July 9th 2012- it is in the archive.
    I can only assume that like everything else in America degrees are for sale- surely someone with degrees from Columbia and Berkeley is capable of simple research. In the “67 years later” it is claimed that Japan has no Welfare System- yes it does and substantially more generous it is than America’s, they also have Public Health too.
    In the article above it is claimed that there was a mandate for the Iraqi War- not according to Kofi Annan. He ought to know being in charge of the UN.
    You will think me an apologist for the Democrats, but no- I just hate bullshit!
    Never have I come across such drivel in all my life. If it doesn’t fit, I’ll just make it up.
    Using European Standards neither party in America is left of centre- in fact the UK’s Conservatives are more left than the Democrats. It is comical what scare-mongering goes on. Left ain’t that scary really.
    So to throw the ball back and with Hiroshima as a model- socialism would seem to be a better model. It works! Germany being another fine example.
    Every Norwegian citizen has over a million dollars invested for their pensions- what a caring government! Monies generated from oil production. Australia has the fourth largest pension fund in the world, for a population that is a fifteenth of the US. Their minimum wage is three times the minimum wage in the US- the social disparity in Scandinavia and Australia and most parts of Europe is small. In the US it is equivalent to that of China’s. America has the highest (by a significant amount) prison inmates per capita in the world. More people die from guns at home than wars overseas
    So where did it all go wrong- the US is a toilet!

    • William

      Even Norway has woke up to see the death-spiral of Socialism: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887324549004579065252711509072

      • mrpoohead

        I was not defending socialism- merely condemning the appalling pack of lies that Frontpage seems very good at spreading.
        I am in business and can honestly say that I have never voted for a “leftie” party. However; in their defence- I have lived in a number of Western countries throughout the world, generally their main political parties are slightly left and right of centre and power fluctuates. Not one of them has such poor social disparity- the US has the worst social mobility; so chances are born poor dying poor- not a place of opportunity! The US has six times the prison inmates- none of them have such bad inner city problems. Years ago I walked through the worst suburb in Sydney (Australia) to get to work- having previously lived in East LA I thought my co-workers were making fun. SAFE!
        Thus; I see many benefits to socialism- equally a more spread out wealth means more people can afford my product. I’m not selling Ferrari’s.
        The Democrats are hardly “lefties” by other nations standards. We will be staying where we are- my children go to far better schools, without metal detectors at the doors and police stationed outside all day. The US quite frankly is the toilet of humanity- a truly dreadful place. Who would wish to raise children were you have bars on windows, alarms, walls surrounding your property with barbed wire and broken glass.
        We have freedom!

  • mrpoohead

    Freedom- “removing comments that don’t agree with yours”:

    • allah_speaking

      Huffington Post – regular practice…

  • lulu

    I’ve been an ardent Democrat for years, voted for Obama 2x, but kept wondering why this country was still going downhill, why he ran up the debt & didn’t care, etc. I had an awakening a few weeks ago & have turned completely against the man, I believe w/all my heart he is out to ruin this once-great nation & his opposers are too scared to speak up. My parents are die-hard Democrats, hate the Republicans w/a passion, my dad wondered why we didn’t discuss politics any more & I had to tell him. I almost got thrown out of the house. I believe Obama is using the Cloward-Piven Strategy to accomplish his goal, I printed the original 1966 article & also this excellent speech by David Horowitz, gave them to my dad to read yesterday, I hope he reads them & they open his eyes a bit. The question remains: why is Obama determined to ruin our country? After reading/listening to an interview by Tom Fife (an American who heard Obama’s name mentioned while visiting Moscow in 1992) & remembering a final chapter in a magnificent book called “Black on Red: My 44 Years Inside the Soviet Union,” I have decided–call me crazy–that Obama is a Communist mole, brainwashed from an early age (when the USSR was our biggest threat) & was groomed to infiltrate the US government in order to destroy our economy (through destruction of the middle class), encourage more people to get on welfare, then collapse the economy by shutting off EBT cards (I suspect the computer “glitch” earlier this month w/EBTs was a dry run), sending the country into mass panic & riots, he declares martial law, then establishes himself as dictator. Considering his past actions, I think this is a very real possibility. Whatever the reason, this evil man has it in for the USA, sending us over a fisal cliff, ruining our reputation, alienating our few allies (France, Germany, Spain–spying reports), etc. WHEN IS AMERICA GOING TO WAKE UP?

  • Shirley McMunn

    I see that he doesn’t even know that both Dems and Repubs are owned by the Illuminati/NWO. Is he pretending or that ignorant?

    • Phil McMorrow

      Stay away from Guam. It is in danger of capsizing.

  • Guest

    Also, the man has a SSN from Conneticut.

  • pookieamos

    Excellent article ! Yes, this should be required reading for all. It is deeply overwhelming this is taking place , today , right in front of our eyes yet so many still….sleep. It’s as if there are two Americas . Even as bad as Conservatives see it, I believe there are many Republicans that don’t.

  • SWilliams

    Hope this article is printed again and again so every millenial voter who may be have been exposed to lib propaganda in school can hear the truth about the Iraq War, about Radical Islam, and about this dangerous Regime and those in Congress who support it. VOTE GOP in 2014 and reject the Socialist Agenda !